TechRadar Reviews

Backrooms is A24's new horror movie and one that I had been excited about for a long time. As someone who is obsessed with Kane Parsons' Backrooms YouTube series, I was intrigued to see how it would translate on the big screen. We had the chance to talk about Parsons' "fairly simple" story in an interview.

For me, it worked perfectly, but I do think it's important to acknowledge that I have been a fan of the very idea of Backrooms for a long time, which is why I stand behind my 5-star review. There are a few things that may be frustrating to newcomers, which I'll reference throughout.

First off, we need to talk about the sets. Backrooms is nothing without its iconic, empty, yellow location, and it was so exciting seeing it on this scale. It felt so vast and terrifying even in the early stages of exploration. But our introduction to them is my favorite part of the movie.

The movie wastes no time in throwing us straight in there with some grainy, shaky found footage. I firmly believe that this opening scene will go down in history with other horror greats, because it is the most anxiety-inducing few minutes as we follow a person trying to outrun a mysterious creature.

It's the instability of the found footage camera that makes this so tense. It whips around rapidly, makes jarring movements, and is a nightmare for anyone with motion sickness. Complete with shaky images, great sound design, and bizarre sets, this is an opener that sets the tone of the movie.

And then, it quietens down considerably. Backrooms turns into a slow burn after its tense opening sequence, something that may disappoint fans after it immediately gave us heart palpitations. But this gives us time to introduce us to Clark (Chiwetel Ejiofor) and his therapist, Dr Mary Kline (Renate Reinsve), the movie's excellent central characters. There's also another stellar performance from Creep's Mark Duplass, in a role I won't spoil for you.

We learn about Clark's difficult past, especially with his ex-wife. As a furniture store owner and failed architect, his job perfectly mirrors the strange Backrooms he finds himself in, after he clips through a wall in his store and ends up surrounded by yellow walls and ominous buzzing from the lights above. At first, he finds it fascinating and attempts to map the place out so he can show Mary.

Unfortunately, Mary is skeptical when he shows up to his next session with a crudely drawn map. Clark insists he'll bring back proof, enlisting two of his employees to go into the Backrooms with him with a video camera, giving us enough time to brace ourselves for more creepy found footage.

Indeed, any scenes involving the shaky handheld camera are by far the scariest. I was glad that Backrooms leaned into that grainy, low-quality footage that makes these liminal spaces feel ten times worse. On the flip side, though, I was relieved the movie doesn't entirely rely on found footage, as that may have been too jarring.

This is the movie that long-time fans have been waiting for. It's a beautiful, eerie expansion on Parson's already impressive lore. Much praise has been given to him for his use of the 3D modelling software Blender, and he gets to showcase those talents here. He is currently A24's youngest director, too, but it certainly never feels amateurish.

Backrooms has some well-orchestrated jumps, but if you're expecting loads of them, it won't happen here. Much of the dread and horror comes from the camera either creeping towards something or moving around erratically, both of which are very effective.

The movie also stays true to A24's brand of creepy, slow burns. It works very well here, in my opinion, but there may not be enough to hold the attention of non-Backrooms enthusiasts. In my eyes, though, it was everything I could have hoped for and more.

Chuwi AuBox X 256V: 30-second review

Chuwi has crammed Intel's Lunar Lake platform into one of the smallest and most affordable packages, close in size to the original Intel NUC. The Intel 200 series processor is a serious proposition for anyone chasing efficient local AI compute, a punchy compact desktop replacement, or a whisper-quiet home server.

The 115 TOPS headline figure is not marketing fluff either. With the NPU, GPU, and CPU all pulling together, this machine genuinely handles Copilot+ workloads and lighter local LLM inference without breaking a sweat.

The price is the real story, though. At around $829 direct for the model with the Core Ultra 7 256V silicon, this is slightly more costly than a similar 1TB configuration from GMKtec while maintaining a similar physical footprint. Build quality is impressively high, and it comes with USB 4.0 ports, dual 2.5GbE LAN and dual monitor outputs.

The downsides of this design are that the 16GB of memory is not upgradable, the small size of the system doesn’t allow for a silent cooling system, and using the second USB4 port requires a docking station.

However, most high-end mini systems are transitioning to surface-mounted memory, and there aren’t many other options powerful enough for local LLMs.

Overall, if this system had been launched only a few months ago, it would have been cheaper and probably offered a 32GB option. But its price and specifications increasingly look like the new norm, and by definition, that’s a retrograde step from the systems that came out a year ago.

At a lower price, this might have been featured in our best mini PC guide, but that argument gets less compelling above $800.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)Chuwi AuBox X 256V: Price and availability

• How much does it cost? $829/£612.87
• When is it out? Available now
• Where can you get it? Currently, this machine can be obtained directly from Chuwi

Considering the specification, the price of the AuBox X 256V seems reasonable, but hardly a bargain - it's available direct from Chuwi here.

We’ve seen Intel 200 Series systems costing over $1000 on several occasions, so finding this one with the Core Ultra 7 256V chip directly from the makers for $829 is a small revelation.

The UK price is £612.87, and based on the current exchange rate, it is a little more expensive than in the USA. Euro pricing is €707.58, which is probably the most costly option.

At the time of writing, Chuwi has yet to release this hardware via online resellers, but they sell many products via Amazon, so its appearance on that channel is only a matter of time, I suspect.

For those wanting the same system style but at a lower price, Chuwi has a Core Ultra 5 225V model, just called the Chuwi AuBox X, that sells for $699/£516.76/€596.62. That design comes with the same 16GB of memory, but only 512GB of storage.

These are the only SKUs, and the maximum memory is only 16GB in either case.

The only competitor using the same processor series in a mini PC form factor is GMKtec NucBox K13, which is priced at $719.99 for a machine with the Core Ultra 7 256V and 1TB of storage. If you are willing to work with a 512GB drive, that price can be $669.99.

That makes the Chuwi AuBox X 256V seem overpriced, but there are subtle differences between these designs that might make the Chuwi system worth the extra money.

I suspect the price difference we are seeing is largely due to the dramatic increases in memory and storage costs that are affecting products currently in production. It may be that GMKtec finished making the K13 before these price hikes occurred, allowing them to undercut Chuwi in this instance.

What I don’t have a reason for is why only these two makers have built systems around this mobile silicon, because it seems well-suited to mini PC use.

• Value: 3.5 / 5

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)Chuwi AuBox X 256V: Specs

Model:

AuBox 256V

CPU:

Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, 8C/8T, P-core up to 4.8GHz, E-core up to 3.7GHz, 12MB cache

Architecture:

Lunar Lake (Series 2), TSMC N3B process

TDP:

8-37W (configurable)

iGPU:

Intel Arc 140V, 8 Xe2 cores, up to 1.95GHz, XeSS / XeSS3 support

NPU:

Intel AI Boost NPU4, 47 TOPS, OpenVINO / DirectML / ONNX / WebNN

Total AI TOPS:

115 TOPS (INT8)

Memory:

16GB LPDDR5X 8533 MT/s, on-package (soldered)

Storage:

1TB PCIe 4.0 SSD ZHITAI Ti600

Storage expansion:

2x M.2 2280 (up to 1x PCIe 5.0 + 1x PCIe 4.0)

Display outputs:

HDMI 2.1 FRL (8K@60Hz / 4K@120Hz), HDMI 2.1 TMDS (4K@60Hz), DP 1.4 via USB-C (4K@120Hz), USB4 (4K@144Hz)

Max resolution:

8K@60Hz

eGPU:

Yes, via USB4 (40Gbps)

USB

1x USB4 40Gbps (PD + DP), 4x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x USB 2.0

Network

2.5GbE RJ45 (Intel), Wi-Fi 6E (up to 2.4Gbps), Bluetooth 5.3

Audio

3.5mm combo jack

Power

100W 20V / 5A USB-C

OS

Windows 11 Pro, multi-language

Dimensions

128.4 x 128.4 x 40.5mm

Weight

580g

Colour

Black

VESA mount

Yes, VESA 100

Chuwi AuBox X 256V: Design

• Mostly metal Mini PC
• USB ports on front and back
• Easy internal access

Mini PCs are not exactly celebrated for bold industrial design, and the AuBox X is no exception. Chuwi has kept things understated. The chassis is a compact black square measuring 128.4 x 128.4 x 40.5mm. That is smaller than the GMKtec NucBox K13, which runs to 186mm in length. The AuBox X is genuinely pocket-sized in the way that very few desktop-class machines manage.

At 580g, it is light enough to mount behind a monitor with the supplied VESA bracket, or it can happily live on the desktop, being so small.

Build quality is the area where Chuwi's budget DNA tends to show itself. The brand has a long history in the affordable tablet and laptop space, and its finish tolerances are better than some might expect.

While it isn’t engineered like an Asus NUC, it’s not cheap and plastic either.

The issue with a NUC this small was always going to be thermal design, and it is a genuine talking point here. Chuwi promises whisper-quiet operation, and the Core Ultra 7 256V is well suited to that ambition. With a configurable TDP range of 8 to 37W, the chip can run extremely cool under light loads.

However, when the processing load kicks in, the fan volume becomes much more noticeable. I noticed this on my desk, but if the system were behind a monitor, I suspect it would be much less apparent.

The port layout is generous, given the limited space on the front and back. Up front, you get two USB-A ports for everyday peripherals, plus one USB4 and the audio jack. On the back is the other USB4 port, but it is used by the external PSU to power the device.

Because of that choice, you will need a docking station to use both USB4 ports.

This might be a worthwhile purchase because each of the USB4 ports is rated at 40 Gbps, enabling them to support external SSDs, DisplayPort video, power delivery, and eGPU enclosures.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

One especially useful feature is that the two M.2 NVMe slots are both 2280-sized, enabling this machine to take the least expensive storage in the most common form factor. By default, one of these slots is already occupied with a 512GB module, and that is connected thermally to the metal case with a silicon thermal pad.

On the rear are four USB-A ports, with three being USB 3.2 Gen 2 and one being USB 2.0.

As it has a total of four Gen 2 ports, that means one on the front is, by definition, a Gen 1 port, although Chuwi failed to label any of the USB ports, and I deduced that by testing them all.

Curiously, all the other ports are labelled, including the dual HDMI and DP and 2.5GbE LAN port on the back. But as the makers used black lettering on a dark grey case, it's not like they are easily readable.

Networking is handled by a 2.5GbE Intel port alongside Wi-Fi 6E. At this price, 2.5GbE is expected, and I was a little surprised that we didn’t get two LAN ports. Users planning to use the AuBox X 256V as a home server or NAS companion will appreciate the faster wired throughput. You could easily add another 5GbE or even 10GbE LAN port using an adapter with a USB4 port.

Internal access is straightforward, requiring only four screws to get inside. Once open, you can access the two PCIe M.2 slots. According to the specification, one of these is Gen4 and the other is Gen5, but it isn’t clearly labelled whether the faster port is SSD1 or SSD2.

I suspect the Gen5 one is SSD1, but I don’t have a Gen5 drive to test that assertion. The default Gen 4 drive was inserted into SSD2 on the review hardware.

My only reservations about using a Gen5 drive in this system, and a larger-capacity Gen4 mechanism, are that no thermal pads are included to transfer heat from the drives to the case, and as a result, there might be a tendency for them to overheat.

• Design: 4 / 5

Chuwi AuBox X 256V: Features

• Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
• 16GB of LPDDR5X
• Local AI platform

,The Intel Core Ultra 7 256V is a Lunar Lake chip. Lunar Lake is Intel's second-generation Core Ultra platform, built on TSMC's 3nm N3B process. It is a genuine SoC design, meaning the CPU cores, iGPU, NPU, and memory all live on the same package. That architecture brings real efficiency gains, but it also brings a fixed memory ceiling. The 256V ships with 16GB LPDDR5X running at 8533 MT/s and there is no way to add more.

The chip packs 8 cores across two architectures. Four Lion Cove P-cores handle the heavy lifting, boosting to 4.8GHz. The remaining four Skymont E-cores top out at 3.7GHz and handle background tasks. In PassMark testing, the 256V scores around 19,500 in multi-core, which puts it ahead of the previous-generation Core Ultra 155U and competitive with AMD's Ryzen 7 8840HS despite drawing significantly less power.

Chuwi quotes the PassMark multi-core score as 19,547 on their product page. That puts it ahead of the Core Ultra 5 226V (Chuwi's own lower configuration) and the Ryzen 7 7840HS. It trails dedicated gaming and workstation chips, as you would expect from a 37W-maximum mobile platform.

The integrated Intel Arc 140V is the graphics story here. This is an Xe2 architecture iGPU with 8 compute units running at up to 1.95GHz. Chuwi positions performance as close to an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050, which is a stretch, but the Arc 140V is genuinely the best integrated graphics Intel has shipped.

It supports hardware ray tracing, XeSS upscaling, and XeSS3 Multi Frame Generation. For light gaming at 1080p on medium settings, it is a credible option. For serious gaming, the USB4 port opens the door to an external GPU, which transforms the proposition entirely.

The 16GB LPDDR5X is soldered onto the package. That is the nature of Lunar Lake. There is nothing Chuwi could have done differently. For most everyday tasks and Copilot+ AI workloads, 16GB is workable. For serious local LLM inference, particularly with larger quantised models above 7B parameters, the memory ceiling will bite.

A 7B model in Q4 quantisation sits around 4-5GB. A 13B model in the same format pushes past 8GB. Running either alongside Windows and supporting applications starts to feel cramped.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

Storage is more flexible. The stock 1TB PCIe 4.0 SSD gives ample room for the OS, applications, and a reasonable model library. The dual M.2 2280 slots are the important feature. One supports PCIe 5.0, which is genuinely forward-looking in a machine at this price. Users who want to load larger model libraries or run fast storage for video editing will appreciate the room to expand.

The headline AI figure is 115 TOPS combined. That breaks down to 47 TOPS from the dedicated NPU4, 64 TOPS from the Arc 140V GPU, and a small contribution from the CPU. The NPU4 supports OpenVINO, DirectML, ONNX Runtime, and WebNN. That breadth of framework support matters when you want to run models built for different ecosystems without converting them first.

The 47 TOPS NPU comfortably clears Microsoft's 40 TOPS threshold for Copilot+ certification. That means Recall, Cocreator, Click to Do, and real-time Live Captions all run natively on local hardware rather than bouncing to the cloud. For privacy-conscious users, that is a meaningful difference.

Chuwi specifically calls out OpenClaw support on the product page, which is a local AI agent framework for automation and scripting. It does not come pre-installed, but the hardware is fully capable of running it.

But, a short warning before doing that. OpenClaw isn’t classic AI; it’s an Agent, and therefore, to do clever things, it needs to use an AI to help it decide what to do with its problems. Using it with free AI services is extremely challenging, and even with paid-for AI services, it is possible to incur significant cost overruns given how many tokens OpenClaw can chew through.

• Features: 4 / 5

Chuwi AuBox X 256V: Performance

Mini PC

Chuwi AuBox X

GMKtec K13

CPU

Intel Core Ultra 7 256V

Intel Core Ultra 7 256V

Cores/Threads

8C 8T

8C 8T

RAM

16GB LPDDR5X 8533

16GB LPDDR5

SSD

1TB ZHITAI Ti600

1TB Huawei eKitStor Xtreme 200E

Graphics

Intel Arc Graphics 140V

Intel Arc Graphics 140V

3DMark

WildLife

28538

22653

FireStrike

8456

7364

TimeSpy

4012

3413

S.Nomad

2809

1914

Cine24

Single

122

116

Multi

633

508

Ratio

5.17

4.39

GeekBench 6

Single

2796

2731

Multi

10566

9429

OpenCL

30397

25982

Vulkan

34962

26274

CrystalDisk

Read MB/s

6941

7132

Write MB/s

4900

6338

PCMark 10

Office

8657

7781

WEI

Score

8.8

8.6

The only system I could reasonably compare this to is the GMKtec K13, since they use the same underlying platform.

And, it was soon apparent that the one in the Chuwi AuBox X 256V has been tweaked to deliver more than its brother in the GMKtec K13. I should state that I no longer have the K13, and it may be that GMKtec released later firmware that would level this playing field.

On paper, the Core Ultra 7 256V is an impressive mobile chip that comfortably handles everyday productivity workloads. Office applications, browser-based tools, video calling, and light code compilation all run without hesitation. The P-cores deliver strong single-threaded performance for tasks that do not parallelise well.

Where the chip feels its mobile origins is under extended operations with sustained load. The 37W power cap means the machine eventually throttles when pushed hard for long periods. This is not unusual for Lunar Lake in any chassis, but it is worth testing thoroughly with the loan unit, particularly given Chuwi's compact cooling solution.

This is where the Chuwi AuBox X 256V earns a separate conversation. The mini PC market has split into two camps. There are machines built around AMD Strix Halo APUs with up to 128GB of unified memory, purpose-built for serious local LLM inference.

Then there is everything else. The AuBox X 256V sits in the second camp, which is marginally less impressive, but it sits there with more credibility than most.

The 16GB memory ceiling is the critical limitation. Running a 7B model in Q4_K_M quantisation via Ollama or LM Studio is perfectly manageable and produces usable inference speeds. The GPU can handle the computation while the NPU assists with preprocessing and tokenisation, conveniently.

I’ve not started including AI benchmarks yet, but it is clearly something we will be looking to add, since people are making purchasing decisions based on AI performance.

The picture changes if you factor in the USB4 port. Connecting an eGPU enclosure with 16GB or more of discrete VRAM immediately removes the memory constraint for GPU-side inference. An RTX 4060 Ti 16GB in an external enclosure, for example, turns the AuBox X 256V into a genuinely capable local AI server at a fraction of the cost of a dedicated workstation. That is not a common use case, but it is possible, and this hardware supports it natively.

For Copilot+ workloads, the story is straightforward. Windows Recall, Cocreator, and Live Captions all run on the NPU and iGPU without touching the cloud. The 47 TOPS NPU handles the classification and inference tasks that these features rely on. In practice, that means image recognition, real-time transcription, and on-screen summarisation all work locally, with the privacy benefits that implies.

Speech recognition and lightweight embedding models are well within reach. If you are running a local assistant, a RAG pipeline over a personal document library, or a code completion backend via Continue or Tabby, the AuBox X 256V has enough horsepower to make it feel responsive. It will not replace a machine with an RTX 4090 or 5090 for anything serious, but for a small home server running background AI tasks, it punches well above its price point.

• Performance: 4 / 5

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)Chuwi AuBox X 256V: Final verdict

(Image credit: Chuwi)

It’s been a while since I’ve seen a computer that was so well designed, was built around an excellent platform and had the potential to deliver such a good user experience.

It is a shame, therefore, that Chuwi then took such a solid foundation and let one extremely poor choice take away some of its shine.

Clearly, the person who said that 16GB of memory was plenty had no idea of the implications of that choice, or it was an entirely price-driven decision, where the cost of a 32GB or larger model was considered unworkable.

There is a potential workaround to the memory limits for AI users that involves adding an external GPU using USB4. But that’s an even greater expense to justify, and there are other Intel systems, like the Beelink GTi Ultra Series, that support an external GPU via an exposed PCIe slot.

These do cost a little more, starting at around $869 and requiring a PCIe dock that adds $179, but connecting a graphics card directly rather than via USB4 offers significant benefits. And, those systems come with 32GB of RAM onboard.

In its efforts to capture those with AI interests at the asking price, the Chuwi AuBox X 256V has a relatively narrow use case in that one area. But for more general use, it’s a punchy system that delivers enough performance to compete with traditional desktop systems.

Should you buy a Chuwi AuBox X 256V?

Value

More expensive than the CMKtec K13

3.5 / 5

Design

A small system that uses USB4 for power

4 / 5

Features

Powerful 200 series CPU, Arc GPU and Intel NPU, but only 16GB of RAM

4 / 5

Performance

Up to 25% quicker than the K13

4 / 5

Overall

A neat system that should have cost less or had more RAM options

4 / 5

Buy it if...

You want power in a small package
This is an excellent choice if you want a compact, quiet desktop that handles everyday tasks and Copilot+ AI features without any cloud dependency. But this system is also ideal for a mini server, hardware firewall and a dozen other tasks.

You are dipping your toes into AI
For those experimenting with local LLMs at 7B to 13B parameter scales and want a capable, low-cost starting point, this system ticks those boxes.

Don't buy it if...

You need more than 16GB of RAM
As the memory in this system cannot be replaced, the 16GB of memory you get out of the box is as much as it will ever have. Whether for LLMs, video editing, or heavy virtualisation, the stock RAM is soldered and permanent, which might not fit with larger models. Any plan to run 30B+ parameter LLM models without an eGPU is made impractical with this memory amount.

You need a discrete GPU
If you want an external discrete GPU, then a machine with a PCIe slot, or OCuLink, and an OCuLink box would be a better choice. While it is possible to use USB4 for an eGPU, it doesn’t have the bandwidth that direct PCI Express or OCuLink offers.

Also Consider

GMKtec NucBox K13
A very similar design to the AuBox is built around the same platform, but slightly cheaper. It has a larger enclosure and a 5GbE LAN port. However, it has also been limited to 16GB of RAM with no memory upgrades being possible.

Check out our GMKtec NucBox K13 review

Minisforum UM790 Pro
A powerful AMD system using a Ryzen 9-class processor, supported by the Radeon 780M GPU. Targeted towards creatives and gamers, the expandable memory and dual M.2 PCIe 4.0 SSDs allow you to boost performance according to your requirements, with the standard version already delivering remarkable capabilities.

Check out our Minisforum UM790 Pro review

For more professional hardware, we've reviewed the best business computers.

Keurig K-Mini Mate: one-minute review

Keurig’s range of coffee makers is among the most popular available in the U.S., rivalling the likes of Nespresso and Ninja. Released in 2025, the Keurig K-Mini Mate is the brand’s smallest brewer to date, measuring just nine inches tall and four inches wide, with a modern matte design that’s available in four different colours.

While this coffee maker is the most compact in Keurig’s range, it still offers the same quality we’ve come to expect from the brand, delivering bold, flavorsome single-serve brews between 6oz and 12oz. The machine itself is effortless to use: you simply top up the water reservoir to your desired brew size, insert the K-Cup pod, and press the brew button.

(Image credit: Future)

We found the brewing process for a 12-oz cup took around 1 minute 40 seconds from start to finish, including heating time. Likewise, cleaning the machine requires minimal effort, with its removable parts straightforward to remove, handwash, and re-insert — there’s even a light to indicate when the brewer needs descaling.

Considering the K-Mini Mate’s $89.99 price tag, it offers exceptional value for your money, while its size makes it the perfect coffee-making companion for smaller spaces such as offices, dorm rooms, and kitchens with limited counter space.

(Image credit: Future)

Our only gripes with this brewer are that there is some splashback during the brewing process and some drippage afterwards, but these are more quirks to be aware of than major issues. A slightly more frustrating practical issue is that the 12oz water reservoir needs to be refilled with fresh water after each use.

However, overall, considering the quality of the K-Mini Mate’s design and performance, it offers exceptional value for its $89.99 price tag. Its size and reliability make it the perfect coffee-making companion for smaller spaces such as offices, dorm rooms, and kitchens with limited counter space.

Keurig K-Mini Mate: price and availability

• $89.99 from Keurig
• Regular discounts drop price to between $59.99 and $79.99
• Available at third-party retailers, including Target and Walmart
• Not available in the UK or Australia

Initially available exclusively at Target for $79.99, the Keurig K-Mini Mate is now available from third-party retailers and Keurig directly for between $79.99 and $89.99 (depending on whether a discount is available). However, Target regularly discounts the coffee maker even further, with the price dropping as low as $59.99. Unfortunately, the K-Mini Mate is not currently available in the U.K or Australia.

For that price tag, you’re getting excellent value for money. While this brewer may not offer the wealth of features some of the best coffee makers do, it is considerably more affordable than other top compact coffee makers, such as the De'Longhi Dedica Duo ($299.95 / £279.99) or the Philips Baristina ($449.99 / £299.99 / AU$599).

If you’re after a no-frills capsule (K-Cup pod) machine that won’t break the bank, you can’t go wrong with the K-Mini Mate, though if you want a larger water reservoir and a few more features — while sticking with the Keurig brand — and don’t mind spending a bit more, it’s worth considering the K-Mini Mate Plus ($109.99) or the K-Crema ($219.99). Keurig’s range of products, including the K-Mini Mate, is not currently available in the UK or Australia unless imported.

While the K-Mini Mate is technically a capsule coffee maker, it only uses K-Cup pods, Keurig’s own brand of capsules, which can be purchased directly from its website or third-party retailers like Amazon, with subscription services also available. A box of 24 pods from Keurig costs around $20 (with free delivery available for orders over $35), which works out around 80 cents a pod. However, bigger discounts are available on bigger boxes.

The variety of K-Cup brands and beverage options is pretty impressive, with pods available from Starbucks, Dunkin’, Green Mountain, McDonald's, and more. What’s more, at the time of writing, those who register their new machine with Keurig receive 50% off their next beverage order (valid for up to five boxes of K-Cup pods (conditions apply).

Keurig also offers optional recycling and composting service called K-Cycle, whereby you can purchase a K-Cup pod recovery bin ($139.95 for a small five-pack and $189.95 for a large five-pack), fill it with your used K-Cups, and return it to the company. Keurig then converts 75% of the pod’s weight into compost and 25% into recycled product.

• Value score: 5/5

Keurig K-Mini Mate: specifications

Type

Single-serve coffee maker

Color

Black, Red Rocks, Glamping Green, Pink Sands

Capsules

K-Cup pods

Brew pressure

Two options: Classic or Pressure

Brew sizes

6oz, 8oz, 10oz, 12oz

Water reservoir capacity

12oz

Special features

Energy saver auto off function, high altitude setting, descale indicator, travel mug friendly

Smart control?

No

Dimensions (H x W x D)

9.1 x 3.9 x 10.9 inches / 23.1 x 9.9 x 27.7cm

Dishwasher safe?

No

Keurig K-Mini Mate: design

• Compact and lightweight
• Four matte colors available
• Easy to clean
• Some drips and splashback
• Water reservoir needs refilled after each use

The Keurig K-Mini mate is the brand’s smallest brewer to date, measuring just 9.1 x 3.9 x 10.9 inches (H x W x D). As such, it’s ideal for those with limited kitchen counter space or for those looking for a coffee maker for a smaller space, like a home office. The design is sleek and modern, with four matte colours available: Black, Glamping Green, Pink Sands, and Red Rocks — all of which retail for approximately the same price.

At the top of this slim coffee maker is a simple control panel, featuring a brew button (indicated by the Keurig ‘K’ logo) and a descale indicator light that turns on when your machine needs descaling. The top of the machine lifts open to reveal a removable K-Cup pod holder at the bottom and a single sharp needle at the top that punctures the K-Cup. At the front of the coffee maker, near the bottom, is a slot for the removable drip tray, which can be removed entirely to accommodate travel mugs.

(Image credit: Future)

At the back of the machine is a removable 12oz single-cup water reservoir, with markers for 6oz, 8oz, 10oz, and 12oz. With no specific modes for different cup sizes, before making your beverage, simply fill the water reservoir to the line corresponding to the brew size you want. However, note that the water must be refilled with fresh water after each use due to its smaller capacity.

While the K-Mini Mate isn’t dishwasher-compatible, its removable parts can be easily handwashed, and its body wiped down with a cloth. Just be careful when wiping near the needle inside the machine, as it's extremely sharp. Likewise, there’s a smaller, less noticeable needle inside the K-Cup holder that you should be extra cautious with when hand-washing

(Image credit: Future)

Our only grievances with the K-Mini Mate’s design (which are our only main issues with the machine overall) were some splashback during the brewing process and a little bit of drippage after the process had finished. These are more frustrating quirks than deal breakers, but they’re worth being aware of if you have children in the house.

• Design score: 4.5/5

Keurig K-Mini Mate: performance

• Rich, flavorsome brews
• Brews 12oz cups in around one minute 40 seconds
• Effortless to use
• Not overly loud

Brewing a beverage with the Keurig K-Mate Mini is extremely straightforward. In fact, it’s one of the most accessible coffee makers we’ve ever used. The process simply requires you to fill the water reservoir to your desired capacity, open the top of the machine, insert your K-Cup pod, close the machine, and press the ‘K’ brew button. That’s it.

(Image credit: Future)

We conducted our testing with KPod Italian Decaffeinated pods (medium roast) and found the results impressive. Each brewed coffee was sufficiently hot, without being scalding, and packed with bold, rich flavor. 12oz coffees (the maximum size available) took around one minute and 40 seconds to brew from start to finish, including heating time, with the average sound level during operation registering between 63 and 65 decibels, about the volume of a conversation in a busy cafe, with most of that volume coming from the sound of the coffee hitting the liquid already in the cup.

FutureFutureFutureFuture

During our first test, we used what we thought was a sufficiently sized mug for a 12oz coffee (judging primarily by eye), but in actuality, it was probably a 10oz, which meant the 12oz brew filled it right up to the rim. In future testing, we made sure to use a larger mug size that allowed for the brew and the addition of milk. Our advice, then, is to choose a mug that is around two ounces larger than the brew you plan to make, especially if you plan to add syrups or milk to your beverage.

• Performance score: 5/5

Should you buy the Keurig K-Mini Mate?Keurig K-Mini Mate score card

Attribute

Notes

Score

Value

This compact brewer offers excellent value for money, considering it offers a high quality of performance and design for less than $100.

5/5

Design

Keurig's smallest coffee maker is compact, modern, and available in four colours. It's perfect for smaller spaces, but brews can splash back during operation and the machine drips a bit following use.

4.5/5

Performance

The K-Mini Mate delivers the quality performance we'd expect from a Keurig coffee machine, delivering bold brews in under two minutes with ease.

5/5

Buy it if

You need a coffee maker for a small space

The K-Mini Mate is a compact coffee maker, measuring 9.1 x 3.9 x 10.9 inches (H x W x D). As such, it's an ideal brewer for those with limited kitchen space or for smaller spaces, like dorm rooms or home offices.

You want a high-quality coffee maker for under $100

Finding a quality coffee maker for under $100 can sometimes be a feat, but at $89.99, the Keurig K-Mini Mate is definitely worth considering. It may not have the bells and whistles of other brewers, but it delivers high-quality results and performance. Plus, regular discounts — especially at Target — can see the price dropping to between $59.99 and $79.99.

You want cafe-quality coffee at home

The K-Crema uses K-Cup pods, and the variety of pods available is pretty impressive. Due to Keurig’s many partnerships, beverage pods are available from brands, including Dunkin’, Lipton, Starbucks, McDonald’s, Tim Hortons, Twinings, and more, allowing you to enjoy coffee shop drinks from the comfort of your home — while saving some cash.

Don't buy it if

You want a lot of modes and features

The K-Mini Mate is a no-frills single-use coffee maker. While its water reservoir offers various brew sizes and its Keurig’s K-Cup range includes a variety of beverages, the machine has no specific brewing modes and few special features. While this makes it straightforward to use, it may make it less suited to those who want extra bells and whistles, like milk frothing.

You don't want to refill the water reservoir after each use

Due to its 12oz capacity, the K-Mini Mate’s water reservoir needs to be refilled with fresh water after every brew. This could be frustrating for those who plan to use the machine to make multiple beverages in succession. If that’s you, then we recommend checking out the K-Mini mate Plus, which offers the same quality but with a larger water reservoir.

You don't want to be tied to using K-Cup pods

While Keurig offers a wide range of K-Cups, you may not want to be tied to using the beverage pods, or brands, that are available. If you prefer alternative third-party coffee capsules or are moving from another coffee maker brand, like Nespresso, and hope to continue using the same pods, this may not be the coffee maker for you.View Deal

Keurig K-Mini Mate: also consider

If you're not sure whether the Keurig K-Mini Mate is the right coffee maker for you, here are two other options for you to consider.

Lavazza A Moda Mio Smeg

This stylish capsule coffee maker brews an exceptional espresso using Lavazza's A Moda Mio capsules, which are a lot more affordable than some other brands. The downside is that they're not as easily recyclable as Nespresso capsules or K-Cups.View Deal

Philips Baristina

If you want a coffee maker that's small and easy to use, but you don't want to be tied into using a certain type of capsule, the Baristina is the machine for you. It makes using fresh beans just as easy as pods, without the waste.

Read our full Philips Baristina reviewView Deal

There are bound to be many people reading this review and wondering why something that should have been covered a decade ago has resurfaced on our site.

And, it is true that Seagate launched the IronWolf 8TB model in 2016, hardware that is hardly considered current in 2026.

But this review isn’t covering the mechanism that Seagate launched then, the ST8000VN0022, thankfully. Instead, it is the one that came after that in 2019, the ST8000VN004.

For complete transparency, they released a newer option, the ST8000VN002, in 2021, but during my review, I’ll explain the differences and why you might want one over the other.

OK, I accept that this model has been around for 8 years, almost, but we’re exceptionally busy here at Tech Radar Pro, and we get to things eventually.

The fundamentals of the 8TB IronWolf have been remarkably stable across the past decade. Every generation has used CMR recording, which matters. IronWolf drives feature CMR technology and AgileArray firmware, ensuring smooth RAID performance, reduced vibration, and efficient power management. The 180TB per year workload rating, the RV sensors, the three-year warranty, and the bundled Rescue Data Recovery Services have all persisted as defining features of the consumer tier.

The EHA (European Hardware Awards) named the Seagate IronWolf portfolio Best Hard Drive for 2025, which suggests the brand has maintained its reputation well.

However, there is one significant blot on this landscape, and that’s the price increases that this drive, and others have experienced in the past six months.

An IronWolf 8TB costs about 95% more than it did in 2025, depending on the region it is sourced from, and prices still show an upward trend. Admittedly, this isn’t as bad as the price increases we’ve seen in memory and SSDs, where some items have quadrupled in cost, but it’s a shock to a market that expected cost reductions over time.

Is it the right time to buy Seagate IronWolf drives? That depends on how flexible you are about timescales, and if you believe that the AI crash is just around the corner or that the price pad today will be a fraction of where it might end up going. Whichever side of that line you fall, there was probably a better time that has since passed.

Seagate IronWolf 8TB NAS drive: Price

You can’t get the ST8000VN004 on the Seagate site, but the company still makes it, and it can be found on Amazon (and other online retailers) for $299.99 on Amazon.com, or £283.94 on Amazon.co.uk. The price across the rest of Europe is €317 via Amazon.

To put that in perspective, in October of 2025, the same drive would cost you £145 in the UK, making it 95% more expensive in just a few months.

But Seagate’s competitors have pulled the same rug up under their customers, with the Western Digital 8TB WD Red Plus being $314.99, and the Toshiba N300 8TB NAS is close to $400.

The only cheap alternative I’ve seen is from a brand called MDD or MaxDigitalData, which sells an 8TB drive for $238.95, but I have no experience with this brand.

Excluding that option, Seagate is the cheapest option for 8TB 7200rpm NAS drives.

However, if we break down the current Seagate IronWolf drives, there is an important trend that we need to understand. As a side note, I’ve not included one of the 10TB models, since these don’t seem to be readily available at this time. All these prices are from Amazon, but you might get a better deal elsewhere.

Type

Capacity

Model

Dollar Cost

Per TB

IronWolf

4TB

ST4000VN006

$169.99

$42.50

8TB

ST8000VN004

$299.99

$37.50

10TB

ST10000VN0008

$399.00

$39.90

12TB

ST12000VN0008

$410.87

$34.24

14TB

ST14000VN0008

$541.75

$38.70

16TB

ST16000VN001

$579.99

$36.25

18TB

ST18000VN000

$744.45

$41.36

IronWolf Pro

4TB

ST4000NT001

$259.00

$64.75

8TB

ST8000NT001

$319.99

$40.00

12TB

ST12000NT001

$459.99

$38.33

16TB

ST16000NT001

$579.99

$36.25

20TB

ST20000NT001

$719.99

$36.00

24TB

ST24000NT002

$859.99

$35.83

28TB

ST28000NT000

$1,019.99

$36.43

32TB

ST32000NT000

$1,159.99

$36.25

As you can see, based on cost per TB, the most expensive IronWolf or IronWolf Pro are the 4TB capacities, and the sweet spot is the 12TB IronWolf. The 8TB IronWolf isn’t a bargain, but it's cheaper than the IronWolf Pro 8TB. Counterintuitively, the larger the drives get, up to 24TB, the cost goes down per TB.

Where things get weird is with the larger IronWolf models, as they approach their 18TB zenith. Due to poor availability, the 16TB IronWolf costs the same as the 16TB IronWolf Pro, and the 18TB model is actually more expensive.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)Seagate IronWolf 8TB NAS drive: Design

As a reviewer of hard drives for at least the past thirty years or more, one of the critical selling points that makers often highlighted was the number of platters and heads.

And some brands still detail this in their product overviews, but Seagate does not.

Part of this coyness is down to the maker wanting to change the number of platters in existing product lines without generating a user backlash.

However, as storage technology has advanced, which allows for greater data density on each platter, the makers can reduce cost (and increase profit) by reducing the number of platters but retaining the same total drive capacity.

Curiously, the 8TB IronWolf is a classic example of this in action.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

The first version in 2016, the ST8000VN0022, had six platters and twelve heads, at roughly 1.33TB per platter. Then came the ST8000VN004 that replaced it, which I believe had five platters and ten heads, which works out to 1.6TB per platter.

And finally, in 2021, the ST8000VN002 arrived, and it is suspected that it has just four platters, making each 2TB.

Note that the N004 is a 7200 rpm drive, whereas the more recent N002 is a 5400 rpm unit. They both use CMR recording technology, have the same 256MB of cache, and have a 3-year warranty. But the N004 uses 7.8W of power in operation, where the N002 uses less than half of that at 3.4W.

The faster rotation speed does translate into some extra transfer speed, 210MB/s versus 202MB/s, but even in an array with up to eight disks, that extra performance still doesn’t justify the extra power consumption for a system running 24/7. And, since power generally turns into heat, a system using the N002 drives might run cooler, too.

Seagate IronWolf 8TB NAS drive: Understanding the price hikes

(Image credit: Seagate)

As I mentioned at the start of this review, prices for all hard drives, not just NAS-specific ones, have increased in the past six months. Why is that?

• AI Data Centre Demands
• Supply Constraints
• Component Shortages
• Production priorities

Clearly, the biggest impact is being felt on those drives and drive types that are used in an AI data centre. Which is slightly odd, because while many companies have laid out ambitious plans to build massive gigawatt-consuming AI facilities, the number of these that have actually been built, or even broken ground, is remarkably small.

So, where did all the hard drives from the channel go? Mostly into warehousing, where they’re being held for the companies with the big plans. Some have gone into data archival solutions created by major cloud suppliers, expecting a huge increase in demand, but most are sitting waiting for AI to call them to action. For the drive makers, the idea that all this pre-sold stock might suddenly end up back in the channel if the AI bubble bursts must be a truly terrifying one.

While it doesn’t impact the 8TB model covered here, drives above this one, 10TB and up, are impacted by shortages in helium supply, which is necessary for high-capacity drives, and has hampered production output.

What has exacerbated the situation is that, wishing to cash in on the AI boom, drive makers have focused more heavily on the larger capacities, all of which need helium to work.

Prior to the AI era, there was a general transition underway from physical hard drives to SSDs. But since SSDs are now stupidly expensive, that has propelled system builders back towards the humble HDD, increasing demand.

Reacting to this, drive makers have focused on data centre, enterprise, and high-capacity consumer drives (IronWolf/EXOS), which are being prioritised, leading to shortages of general consumer models. And, in the context of the wider market, drives like the IronWolf 8TB are considered both business and consumer, further increasing demand for them.

In short, this is a perfect commercial storm in which market forces are aggressively driving prices, and the outlook is uncertain.

If it's ever been the right time to shop around, then this is it. Or, wait out the storm and hope that the AI bubble bursts and releases lots of stock into the market, forcing prices down.

For anyone working on a major NAS or server deployment in the near future, this news is not positive.

Seagate IronWolf 8TB NAS drive: Final verdict

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

The IronWolf ST8000VN004 is a mature, well-understood drive at this point. The core technology is not new, but that is not necessarily a weakness. CMR reliability at 8TB is proven, the compatibility list with NAS vendors is extensive, and Seagate's IHM integration is now embedded across most major platforms, including Synology and QNAP.

For home users or small businesses, the IronWolf 8TB is an option, but its 12TB brother offers better value. If you specifically want 8TB drives, then use the 5400rpm ST8000VN002 instead. It’s technically a little slower, but it has half the power consumption, impacting the cost of ownership.

But there might be better alternatives with higher-capacity drives, where the overall spend on drives isn’t substantially different.

Let’s imagine we have a six-bay NAS, and the plan is to use RAID 5 with a hot-swap drive ready to handle any failure. Using 8TB drives that would give 24TB of usable space and would cost approximately $1800 in drive expenditure.

Switching to 12TB drives, getting 24TB of usable capacity under RAID 5 requires only three drives, and even with a hot spare available, you have two free bays and a total outlay of $1644. And, some additional savings could be made on the NAS, getting a four-bay model.

There is an argument that an array with five active drives will perform better than one with three, and it will. But many NAS use SSDs for caching, and unless you use 10GbE networking, the roughly 630MB/s that the 12TB drives can shift won’t seem slower than the 1000MB/s that the 8TB could transfer.

Internally, there might be a difference in transfers, but to LAN-connected users, the performance benefit of having more drives in the array isn’t apparent. There is also good logic that the more drives you have, the greater the statistical chance that one of them will fail, though smaller drives also lead to a faster rebuild in the event of a drive failure.

So would I buy the 8TB IronWolf? Neither model has a compelling argument at these price points. There is a better argument for the 12TB, or the Pro 12TB.

My concern is that because people are spending company money in many cases, they’ll just pay what drive makers are asking, encouraging them to make even fewer drives, forcing prices even higher. Eventually, the businesses currently reaping massive profits (like Samsung and Micron) will cook their golden goose completely, if they haven't already

For more top performers, we've tested out the best NAS drives you can get.

Portable monitors tend to have two problems. They're usually low quality displays and also low resolution. Give it up, therefore, for the new Acer PE160WUT. It's a 16-inch portable monitor with not only 2.8K native resolution, but also OLED panel technology.

That's a pretty good start, but add 120 Hz refresh and touchscreen functionality into the mix and this compact display is a seriously appealing proposition. It promises an external monitor solution that's at least as good, if not better, than the built-in display of most premium laptops.

There's also the tantalising prospect, albeit without official support, of adding touchscreen functionality for Apple MacBook laptops. Apple, of course, doesn't do touchscreen MacBooks. And it's all wrapped up in a fairly slick, slim-bezel chassis that's surprisingly light.

As with the entries in our guide to the best portable monitors, the Acer PE160WUT should also be widely compatible with most modern PC laptops. It connects via USB-C primarily, though it does have HDMI fall-back connectivity, too.

Just note that this is not a battery-powered display. It takes power via USB-C, so when you are away from mains power it will be drawing energy from your laptop's battery.

Acer ProDesigner PE160WUT: Design and featuresFutureFutureFuture

• Compact and light
• 2.8K OLED display
• No integrated battery

Specs

Panel size: 16-inch

Panel type: OLED

Resolution: 2,880 x 1,800

Brightness: 350 nits

Contrast: 1M:1

Pixel response: 1ms

Refresh rate: 120Hz

Color coverage: 100% DCI-P3

HDR: HDR10

VESA: 75mm x 75mm

Connectivity: HDMI 2.1 x1, 2x USB-C

Imagine detaching the display from a 16-inch laptop and you'll get a pretty good idea of the look and feel of the Acer PE160WUT. Just like a lot of laptops, it has slim bezels on three sides of its display, plus a slightly larger chin.

For the most part, it's about as thin as a laptop lid, too. The exception is a thicker section on the bottom third on the rear of the chassis. This houses the electronics, connectivity and hinged kickstand.

The latter allows the Acer PE160WUT to sit pretty comfortably on any flat, firm surface, though it's less useful for, say, propping the display up on your laptop. All told, this portable monitor comes in at just 0.65kg, making it conspicuously light and pretty portable. If you're already carrying a laptop and power supply, this extra monitor is a pretty plausible addition in pure portability terms.

Of course, a big part of the reason why it's so light is the lack of a built-in battery. The display is powered via USB-C and designed to take that directly from a laptop. If that's a boon for portability, it's not so great for battery life away from the mains.

Of course, the main attraction is the 16-inch OLED display. With a native resolution of 2,880 by 1,800 pixels, it offers a pixel density of around 212 DPI. That's a little lower than the 224 DPI of a MacBook Air or 254 DPI of a MacBook Pro. But it's still pretty decent.

What no MacBook can offer, of course, is OLED panel technology or, indeed, touchscreen tech. That's a combination several PC notebooks include, of course. But by any reasonable metric, this is a highly specified portable display.

Acer ProDesigner PE160WUT: PerformanceFutureFutureFutureFuture

• Bright and vivid OLED panel
• Smooth 120 Hz refresh
• Not quite as crisp as you'd hope

The 2.8K native resolution, 120 Hz refresh and OLED panel tech set up some pretty lofty expectations. The Acer PE160WUT doesn't quite nail all of them.

There's a lot to like, starting with the punchiness and vividness of the OLED panel. With a rating of 350 nits full screen, it gets plenty bright enough. But to that it adds OLED's usual advantages of perfect per-pixel lighting and outstanding pixel response speed.

This isn't a gaming panel, but the 120 Hz refresh makes it feel very slick and responsive, too. Those aspects are a real treat. Even LCD panels with full-array local dimming can't come close to matching the lighting precision of OLED.

However, there are some limitations, too. For starters, the brightness isn't adjustable in the otherwise nicely calibrated sRGB or Adobe RGB presets, which is a pity. You might want to ramp it up in some ambient light conditions and the default user mode isn't terribly well calibrated.

Short of DIY calibration, a work around is to run the panel in HDR mode, in which setting SDR content is actually well calibrated. But that brings us to two further snags. First, the HDR performance is underwhelming.

Acer doesn't provide detailed specs, but it very much looks like HDR brightness is capped at the panel's 350 nit full-screen brightness, or thereabouts. What's more, running in HDR mode consumes additional power. And power consumption is a definite issue with this monitor, which again does not have its own integrated battery and takes power over USB-C, typically from a laptop.

By way of example, with this OLED panel connected to an Apple MacBook Air with both the MacBook's screen and this panel set to half brightness, the combination consumed 10% of the MacBook's battery in just 15 minutes.

And the MacBook running on its own? 15 minutes of comparable running eats up 2% of battery life. In other words, there's a heavy battery life penalty of using this display. And that's in SDR mode. HDR would be even worse.

Speaking of connecting a MacBook, the touchscreen functionality only has limited, clunky support to the extent that it's not really usable. Meanwhile, the highest properly DPI-scaled resolution is 1,400 by 900 pixels, which is a little low for a 16-inch panel. It will run at the full 2,880 by 1,800 native, of course, but at that setting fonts and icons are absolutely tiny. For the record, in Windows the touch functionality works pretty well, aided by the nippy 120 Hz refresh.

But the biggest issue is the screen's anti-glare coating. It's matte and quite coarse with some distinctly visible sparkle. It definitely detracts from the crispness and precision of the display. Fonts and text, for instance, look a little soft and blurry as a consequence. It's not a total deal breaker, but this little OLED panel deserves a much better anti-glare coating.

Acer ProDesigner PE160WUT: Final verdictFutureFutureFuture

There's a lot to like about the Acer ProDesigner PE160WUT. It's certainly novel to have an OLED panel in a portable monitor like this. The 2.8K resolution and 120 Hz refresh are likewise exactly what you'd want to see. Too many portable monitors are low resolution and low refresh.

It's also very compact and lightweight. At just 0.65kg, it really is plausible to chuck this thing in your bag with whatever laptop you have. And in terms of image quality, there are plenty of pros. The Acer ProDesigner PE160WUT is pretty punchy, with great colours and generally very good calibration.

OK, the HDR performance disappoints. But for colours and contrast, this display will beat most laptop panels. Add in the touchscreen functionality and you have a compelling proposition, albeit the touchscreen feature really only works well on PC laptops, rather than Apple MacBooks.

The one real issue, then, is the screen's coarse anti-glare coating. It definitely compromises the precision of the image quality and detracts from what is otherwise a very sweet little portable OLED panel. It's also worth bearing in mind that the lack of an integrated battery means that your laptop's battery will take a hammering when using this display away from the mains.

All that said, the Acer ProDesigner PE160WUT retains plenty of appeal. Even with the overly coarse anti-glare coating, it's still one of the best portable monitors we've seen.

FutureFutureFutureFuture

For more displays, we've reviewed the best business monitors and the best 5K and 8K monitors.

BOSGAME P4 Ultra: 30-second review

Mini PCs have never been more crowded. Every few months, a new batch of compact desktops arrives from Chinese brands promising big performance in a small chassis, and the Bosgame P4 Ultra is the latest to land on the desk for evaluation. It slots into the brand's Effizen series, which targets productivity and everyday computing rather than serious gaming.

The headline here is the AMD Ryzen 7 7730U. It is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on Zen 3 architecture, clocked up to 4.5GHz, and paired with Radeon Vega 8 integrated graphics. That combination is capable, but it is worth being honest from the start: the 7730U is a Barcelo Refresh part, which means it is architecturally identical to the 5825U from 2021. Bosgame has dressed it in a new product number, but the silicon is not new.

What is new, or at least appealing, is the package. The P4 Ultra ships either with Windows 11 or Ubuntu 24.04 LTS pre-installed, making it one of the more accessible Linux mini PCs on the market. It also brings dual 2.5GbE LAN ports, Wi-Fi 6E, and triple 4K display output, all wrapped in a compact chassis with a VESA mount in the box.

The asking price is around $420 from online retailers, which puts it up against stiff competition from Beelink, GMKtec, and even other BOSGAME models.

This isn’t an expensive mini PC system, but it's also not the cheapest given the modest specifications.

As with most of the hardware this brand makes, the P4 Ultra is a well-executed solution that would work for general office computing, but it lacks the performance required by creatives and developers.

And, due mostly to the age of its platform, this isn’t a system we’ll be including as one of our best mini PC entries.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)BOSGAME P4 Ultra: Price and availability

• How much does it cost? From $420/£440/€510
• When is it out? Available now
• Where can you get it? Direct from online retailers

At the time of writing, the P4 Ultra doesn’t appear to be listed on the Bosgame website in the Effizen Series mini PCs collection. Hopefully, this will change.

However, if you search for the “P4 Ultra”, you can find a landing page for a Linux version of this machine with Ubuntu installed on it.

The UK asking price for that machine is £379, which seems most reasonable.

Those wanting Windows 11 preinstalled on the same hardware, as there is only one 16GB/1 TB SKU, need to look for this machine from online retailers.

On Amazon.com, it can be found for $419.98, in the UK it is £439, and across Europe it's €509. Given the spec, that looks like an attractive proposition.

One problem for Bosgame is that for almost exactly the same price, GMKtec is selling the M6 Ultra, and that has a better Ryzen 7640HS processor and 16GB of DDR5 RAM.

And another is the Beelink SER 5 MAX, which, for $458.99, offers the AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS CPU, 24GB of DDR5 memory, and a 500GB SSD.

But even Bosgame undercut itself with the P3 Mix, a system they sell for less than $400, that uses the Ryzen 7640HS (up to 5.0 GHz), has 16GB DDR5, and a 512GB PCIe SSD, all in an identical case to the P4 Ultra.

Based on these alternatives, the P4 Ultra should have been closer to $375.

• Value: 3 / 5

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)BOSGAME P4 Ultra: Specs

Item

Spec

CPU

AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (8C/16T, up to 4.5GHz)

GPU

AMD Radeon Graphics Vega 8 (8 cores, up to 2000MHz)

NPU

None

RAM

16GB DDR4 3200MHz dual-channel (2x SODIMM slots, up to 64GB)

Storage

1TB M.2 NVMe PCIe 3.0 x4

M.2 Expansion

1x additional M.2 2280 PCIe 3.0 x4 (up to 8 TB per slot; 16 TB total)

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4, 1x USBC

Front Ports

2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C, 3.5mm audio, power button

Rear Ports

2x USB 2.0 Type-A, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, 2x 2.5 GbE RJ-45, DC power

Networking

Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.2, 2xl 2.5GbE LAN

OS

Windows 11 Pro (pre-installed); Linux supported

Dimensions

107 x 111 x 56 mm

Weight

Approx. 0.65 kg

Included Accessories

30W USB-C PD adaptor, VESA mount bracket, HDMI cable, power brick, manual

BOSGAME P4 Ultra: Design

• Familiar chassis
• Limited port selection
• Complicated internal access

The P4 Ultra follows the now-familiar NUC-inspired layout: a rectangular aluminium-and-plastic chassis small enough to sit beside a monitor, mount behind one via VESA, or tuck out of sight entirely. The case features precision laser-faceted metal vents along the sides and rounded corners, giving it a reasonably contemporary appearance.

The front panel carries the power button, two USB 3.2 Gen 2 ports, a USB-C port, and a 3.5mm audio jack. There are no ports on the sides, on the back, you will find the two 2.5GbE RJ45 ports, a further two USB 2.0 ports, a single HDMI 2.0 and DisplayPort 1.4, and the DC power input. The layout is logical and functional, though the USB 2.0 ports feel like a cost-cutting measure on an otherwise reasonably specified machine.

That all the better USB ports are on the front is somewhat annoying, and I’ve noticed a few resellers claiming that the USB-C port is USB4, when it isn’t. It is USB 3.2 Gen 2, as are the other USB ports on the front. But it does support video mode, which increases the potential monitor count to three with the HDMI and DP.

Cooling is handled by an active fan system. BOSGAME describes the design as quiet, and at the 15W default TDP, that is credible, though sustained loads will prompt audible fan activity. However, my review machine was delivered in 35W performance mode, which made it slightly noisier. Selection of the Quiet (15W), Balanced (25W) and Performance (35W is via the BIOS. It would be nice if this were changeable in Windows.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

One especially useful feature is that the two M.2 NVMe slots are both 2280-sized, enabling this machine to take the least expensive storage in the most common form factor. By default, one of these slots is already occupied with a 512GB module, and that is connected thermally to the metal case with a silicon thermal pad.

On the rear are four USB-A ports, with three being USB 3.2 Gen 2 and one being USB 2.0.

What I wasn’t keen on was access to the internal memory and storage, which seemed initially easy, and then got progressively more complicated.

Removing the underside is straightforward enough, four screws, and it comes away easily.

However, once inside, there is an additional fan bracket layer, with three screws of two different sizes. The two longer screws aren’t easy to see or access, and they’re even more fun to put back if you don’t have a magnetic screwdriver.

When you do get this layer out, and there is a ribbon cable carrying power to its fan that you need to be careful of, you can then access the memory and storage.

The good news here is that everything is upgradable, and there is a second M.2 2280 slot, and the bad news is that both M.2 slots are only PCIe 3.0. The M.2 slots do at least have a thermal pad to pull heat away from them, although as they’re not PCIe 4.0 spec they are unlikely to overheat.

The chassis in this design is almost identical to that used in a number of other Bosgame products, and it doesn’t stray far from the original NUC concept. I just wish the designers hadn’t put so many hurdles in the way of anyone wanting to add more memory or storage.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

• Design: 3.5 / 5

BOSGAME P4 Ultra: Features

• AMD Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vega 8 GPU
• 16 GB DDR4
• Lacks an NPU

The Ryzen 7 7730U is the centrepiece, and it deserves some context. AMD launched it in late 2022 as part of the Barcelo Refresh line-up. Zen 3 is a proven architecture that delivered a genuine generational leap when it debuted in 2020, and it remains a competent foundation for office and productivity work in 2025. But it sits behind Zen 4 (the 7040 series) and the newer Zen 5 parts in both IPC and integrated graphics performance.

That graphics point matters here. The Vega 8 GPU inside the 7730U has 512 shaders running at up to 2000MHz. It is adequate for 4K video playback, light photo editing, and casual games, but it trails the RDNA 3 graphics in Zen 4 mobile processors by a meaningful margin. For comparison, the Ryzen 7 7840HS found in the higher-spec BOSGAME P3 carries RDNA 3 with considerably better graphics performance.

Memory is 16GB of DDR4 at 3200MHz in a dual-channel configuration, which is the right setup for integrated graphics. Single-channel DDR4 cuts available graphics bandwidth roughly in half, so the dual-channel arrangement here is a sensible default. The SODIMM slots support up to 64GB of memory.

The issue is that many similarly priced systems use DDR5, and its bandwidth boost improves both CPU and GPU performance; in particular, graphics performance is enhanced because the integrated GPU shares the main memory.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

Storage is a 1TB M.2 NVMe drive running on a PCIe 3.0 x4 interface. This is not Gen 4, and sequential read speeds will be capped accordingly, but for day-to-day computing, it is more than fast enough. A second M.2 2280 slot sits unoccupied, which makes life remarkably simple when you wish to clone the original drive to one with a larger capacity.

Connectivity is a genuine highlight of this design, making it potentially useful as a hardware firewall. Dual 2.5GbE ports open up small office routing, NAS aggregation, and network isolation use cases that single-port machines cannot touch. Wi-Fi 6E covers all three bands, including the congestion-free 6GHz spectrum, and Bluetooth 5.2 handles peripherals cleanly.

How you feel about the hardware in this machine comes down to two aspects. And those are how much you use graphics and what types of processing you intend to do.

The CPU and GPU are both outdated, overtaken by new DDR5 designs that offer more performance and greater power efficiency. There is no dedicated NPU for AI work, so this machine is only suitable for general office tasks and not for software development.

It might have a use as an embedded signage system, but it will need ventilation.

• Features: 4 / 5

BOSGAME P4 Ultra: Performance

Mini PC

Bosgame P4 Ultra

GMKtec NucBox K16

CPU

AMD Ryzen 7 7730U

AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS

Cores/Threads

8C 16T

8C 16T

RAM

16GB DDR4 (2x8GB)

32GB LPDDR5 (2x16GB)

SSD

1TB SSD

1TB TWSC TE3420F1TO NVMe

Graphics

Radeon 680M

Radeon 680M

3DMark

WildLife

4961

10320

FireStrike

2368

4508

TimeSpy

1001

1813

S.Nomad

843

1634

Cine24

Single

86

84

Multi

538

595

Ratio

6.23

7.08

GeekBench 6

Single

1965

1957

Multi

6124

7170

OpenCL

13511

24105

Vulkan

11940

22401

CrystalDisk

Read MB/s

3735

3549

Write MB/s

3285

2649

PCMark 10

Office

6257

6785

WEI

Score

6.7

8.1

Some readers will probably think I’m being unfair for comparing the $420 Bosgame P4 Ultra to the $590 GMKtec K16. Yes, the K16 is $170 more, but then look at what a Zen 3+ processor, DDR5 memory, and the Radeon 680 GPU deliver. Almost across the board, the K16 is twice as fast, for only 40% more money. And, if they had the same amount of memory, the cost difference would be less significant.

There are two takeaways from these benchmark results, the first being that anyone who wants to complete their demanding tasks more quickly should invest in a better mini PC that uses DDR5. The other is that for office work, the P4 Ultra is fine.

My view is that systems like this are always being repurposed, because they’re easy to move and reconfigure. What makes one mini PC better than another can often come down to flexibility. The performance envelope of the K16 is much greater than that of the P4 Ultra, making it inherently more flexible and suitable for a wider range of jobs.

If you are convinced that the system you want will only ever do a job for which it is suited, then buying the P4 Ultra might make sense. But if you think that a year from now you might be forced to buy something better, then perhaps it's worth considering that now.

The Bosgame P4 Ultra isn’t a great performer, but what it achieves might be good enough for some customers.

• Performance: 3 / 5

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)BOSGAME P4 Ultra: Final verdict

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

The Bosgame P4 Ultra is a competent compact mini PC that does most things adequately and two things rather well. The dual 2.5GbE networking and the option for a ready-to-run Ubuntu installation are genuine differentiators in a market where most machines ship with Windows and a single Gigabit port.

The honest caveat is the processor. The Ryzen 7 7730U is Zen 3 under a new badge. It is not slow, but it is not modern either. Anyone comparing it against Zen 4 machines at a similar price point will find those alternatives offer better integrated graphics and more up-to-date architecture. The PCIe 3.0 SSD is a similar observation: functional, but not state-of-the-art.

At the right price, those trade-offs are acceptable. The P4 Ultra earns its keep as a quiet, power-efficient desktop for document work, browsing, media playback, and lightweight server duties. Push it harder than that, and you will want to consider the Bosgame P3 Mix or one of the Beelink alternatives with a Hawk Point processor.

Should you buy a BOSGAME P4 Ultra?

Value

Premium price for a Zen 3+ platform

3 / 5

Design

Awkward internals and limited USB ports

3.5 / 5

Features

Dual 2.5 GbE, but an old platform rebranded

3.5 / 5

Performance

Outclassed by DDR5 systems

3 / 5

Overall

A limited use mini PC

3.5 / 5

Buy it if...

You want pre-installed Linux
If you want a capable, compact Linux desktop without building one yourself. The Ubuntu 24.04 LTS pre-installed model means you can be productive within minutes of unboxing. But this hardware will also run Windows 11.

You like upgrades
The second M.2 slot, 2.5-inch bay, and two SODIMM slots give plenty of room to expand. Although this makes for some flexibility, the CPU and memory model aren't cutting-edge.

Don't buy it if...

You need graphics power
This isn't the best integrated graphics available. The Vega 8 GPU in the 7730U is three generations behind RDNA 3, and the performance gap in gaming and GPU compute tasks is real.

You need USB4 or Thunderbolt
Some disappointment will result if you buy this mini PC and need USB4 or Thunderbolt support for high-speed peripherals or an external GPU. These aren't technologies you can add later.

Also Consider

GMKtec NucBox M7 Ultra
Built on the excellent AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U with Zen 3+ architecture and a Radeon 680M GPU, the M7 Ultra Plus offers a more modern platform at a comparable price point. It costs $40 more but gains a more powerful integrated GPU and NPU support.

Check out my GMKtec NucBox M7 Ultra review

Geekom A6
Using the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H platform, the higher specified option costs about $180 more than the P4 Ultra. But for the extra money, you get a Zen 3+ processor, Radeon 680M GPU, 16GB of DDR5 memory, a 512GB SSD and USB 4. The only downside to this design is that the second M.2 slot is only 2242 size.

Check out our Geekom A6 review

For more professional hardware, we've reviewed the best business computers.

Camp Snap CS-Pro: two-minute review

Forget your high-resolution mirrorless camera, your beautiful full-frame sensors — 2026 is the year of the cheap compact camera! Retro-styled, ultra-affordable cameras are back in a big way, following greatly exaggerated rumors of their death at the hands of the smartphone.

The original Camp Snap, released in 2023, was one of the big beneficiaries of this trend. A digital compact costing around $59 / £65, its USP was a feature that it didn't have – a screen. By removing the LCD, the camera evoked the feeling of shooting with an old film disposable — you literally could not see the images you'd taken until you downloaded them onto your computer, just as you couldn't see your images from a disposable until they came back from the development lab.

The Camp Snap CS-Pro, or Camp Snap Pro, is an upgrade of the original, adding a few improvements and gaining a refreshing visual makeover that calls to mind premium compacts like the Fujifilm X100VI. The core concept hasn't changed, though; it's still a screen-free digital compact camera, with a small sensor that's going to produce images that are almost certainly less detailed and high-quality than the ones produced by your phone. But if you're looking for top-notch quality, you are very much missing the point.

The guts of the camera are built around a 1/3.06-inch sensor with 16MP of resolution — double the pixel count of the 8MP original Camp Snap. This sensor is paired with a fixed-focus lens with an equivalent focal length of 22.5mm — nice and wide to fit plenty in the scene — and a fixed aperture of f/2.2. Just as with the original Camp Snap, there's nothing in the way of settings controls; you point, you shoot.

Well, not quite nothing. The CS-Pro adds a dial to its top plate, which provides access to a number of filmic looks. As well as the Standard (STD) look, you also have VTG-1 and VTG-2 ('VTG' meaning 'vintage'), which are stylized color filters that give your image a distinct and decidedly retro-style look. VTG-1 provides an overall warm tone, while VTG-2 pumps up blues and yellows for a hyper-saturated look (think Kodak Ultramax film). Finally, you have the monochrome 'B&W' dial.

(Image credit: Jon Stapley)

So, it's not a reinvention of the Camp Snap wheel. Far from it. Having used the CS-Pro on a few photographic excursions over the past few weeks, I can safely say that if the original Camp Snap wasn't your cup of tea, the CS-Pro won't be either. The resolution upgrade adds a bit of detail and definition, but the small 1/3.06-inch sensor still limits its dynamic range and ability to handle contrasting light situations. It's going to get blown out of the water by even your smartphone, never mind a compact with a proper-sized sensor like the 1-inch chip in the new Panasonic Lumix TZ300 / ZS300.

But again, quality isn't the point. The Camp Snap was a knockabout hit of nostalgic fun for a generation raised on disposable film cameras and cheap digital compacts, and the CS-Pro is all those things too. Once again, the screen-free design serves to create a relaxed shooting experience, and adds a sense of anticipation that recalls the good old days of waiting for your film to come back from the chemist. And if some of your shots turn out to be a bit crap (and they will) — who cares? It's all part of the fun.

I'm glad that Camp Snap didn't let success go to its head and come out with too expensive a camera. By keeping its price to two figures, the CS-Pro sits firmly in the realm of fun, a camera so simple that a child can use it, but with enough retro charm and style to appeal to adults.

(Image credit: Jon Stapley)Camp Snap CS-Pro: price and availability

The CS-Pro is available from Camp Snap's website. Its initial launch price is $99 / £90 (around AU$180), but discounts are frequent — in the UK, at time of writing, it's currently sitting at £68. This is a little more expensive than the original Camp Snap, but not by much – Camp Snap are clearly aware that affordability is a big part of their camera's USP and aren't messing with it. This was the main mistake I felt the firm made with its Super 8-aping CS-8 video camera — at a starting price of $199 / £152, it was just a bit too expensive for a low-quality camera whose main attraction was its novelty factor.

Even with the slight uptick in price, the CS-Pro is one of the most affordable options in the retro-styled digital compact arena. It's cheaper than the more complex and sophisticated RewindPix, which offers a huge range of film-style filters via its app-based digital darkroom.

Camp Snap CS-Pro: design

• Styled after popular premium compacts like the Fujifilm X100
• All-plastic build, lightweight and doesn't feel too robust
• Point-and-shoot operation, with dial for selectable retro filters

As mentioned, the Camp Snap CS-Pro looks at first glance a lot like a premium retro compact in the Fujifilm X100 series, with its black body and silver trim. However, if you were to actually hold both cameras side by side, this illusion would fall apart very quickly. Fujifilm's cameras are gorgeous, all-metal things, their build reflecting their four-figure price tags. The CS-Pro, meanwhile, consists of nothing but plastic and more plastic. It feels cheap, because it is cheap, and doesn't even pull the RewindPix's trick of adding internal metal weights for a bit of extra heft.

Interface-wise, on the top plate you have just the shutter button and the dial with the selectable film filters, the latter of which also functions as the on/off switch. On the rear you have a simple LCD panel that provides a running shot counter — useful if you're a forgetful sort and aren't sure when you last offloaded your pictures.

Beside the screen, you may notice two rows of small holes — amusingly, these are actually for a speaker, which plays recorded stock sounds when the camera is turned off and on and when the shutter is fired. These tinny, generic 'clunks' sound like they were downloaded from a website with a name like 'freemidisoundfx.com', and for all I know they probably were. Unnecessary, but harmless — and you can turn them off.

In the bottom corner is a row of four LEDs which serve as battery indicators — and I must say, I've been shooting with the Camp Snap for weeks without charging it once, and my battery level is still very healthy. Camp Snap rates the battery to 500 shots, and I believe it.

Jon StapleyJon StapleyJon StapleyJon StapleyJon StapleyJon StapleyJon StapleyJon StapleyJon Stapley

In the top-left corner is the optical viewfinder. It's a tiny thing — a far cry from the big, lovely viewfinder on the RewindPix — and the fact that it's both above and to the left of the lens means what you see through it bears only a passing resemblance to what your captured image is going to look like.

On the front, beside the viewfinder, there's a flash. One of the common complaints about the original Camp Snap was the rather weak-beer effort of its piddly LED flash, and the manufacturer has compensated in spades by throwing in a powerful Xenon flash. I'll talk more about this in the next section, but for now it's worth noting that a switch on the front allows you to toggle it between 'Off', 'Auto' and 'Forced'.

Also, surprisingly, the lens on the front has a 37mm filter thread, meaning you can attach protective UV filters, NDs, polarisers or special-effects filters if you have them in the corresponding size. I'm going to be honest — I think the crossover between 'Camp Snap buyers' and 'lens-based filter enjoyers' is vanishingly small, and I find it hard to imagine many people using this feature. But I'm not complaining.

(Image credit: Jon Stapley)

There are lugs for a strap, but no strap is included in the package — no pouch or case either, though Camp Snap did at least find room to pack in a USB-C cable for charging. The port is located on the bottom of the camera, along with a screw thread for mounting on a tripod, and a screwed-on panel that houses the built-in 4GB micro SD card, which you can unscrew to access directly if needed.

Camp Snap CS-Pro: performance

• Images are bright and punchy, but fine detail is lacking, and it can't handle high lighting contrast
• While fixed-focus lens makes operation easy, it can be creatively limiting, and there's no close-up ability
• Xenon flash is ludicrously overpowered — you can thankfully stick with the sensible 'Auto' setting

I'll say it straight out — I find my images from the CS-Pro to be very likeable. Are they high-quality? Absolutely not. They do not stand up to close scrutiny on a pixel level, and I would not make prints from them. But in good light, the CS-Pro produces images with bright, punchy colors — vivid blue skies, pleasant greens, and rich, golden sun.

The wide lens allows you to reliably fit plenty into the frame. Running a few shots helps you get used to finding the sweet spot of distance from your subject — being too close gets you a blurry mess. As a rule, if you're trying to capture an image of a specific object, animal or person, you want at least a meter's distance. Close-ups are a no-no, and you're not going to get creative effects like shallow depth of field.

The extra megapixels on the sensor has definitely improved matters compared to the original Camp Snap, with landscape-style images in particular looking much better thanks to greater detail for delineating distant subjects. However, the small size of the sensor means that dynamic range is still an Achilles' heel. Contrasty light situations are pretty much a no-go – you're all but guaranteed to get blown-out white highlights, or murky impenetrable shadows, or if you're really up against it, both. There's just a physical limit to the kinds of shooting situations the CS-Pro can handle.

However, one thing that can help matters here is the filter dial. Giving your images a retro glow with VTG-1 or VTG-2 can be a handy way to make a blown-out highlight look like an artistic choice, rather than a technological limitation. Indeed, I am generally a fan of the filter dial, even if I do think offering just three options other than the Standard look is rather tight-fisted.

Filter: STDJon StapleyFilter: VTG-1Jon StapleyFilter: VTG-2Jon StapleyFilter: B&WJon Stapley

VTG-1 is lovely and warm — great for sunny evenings. I can see it getting a lot of use in pub gardens and the like. VTG-2 is bright and saturated, giving your images just a bit more zing; like Kodak Ultramax, I'd take it to a day at the beach. And the B&W filter delivers a nice level of tonal contrast for moody monochrome, ideal for days when the weather is overcast and uninspiring. Dull light makes Camp Snap images very dull indeed, and the B&W filter is an excellent way to get around this.

Filter: STDJon StapleyFilter: STDJon StapleyFilter: VTG1Jon StapleyFilter: STDJon StapleyFilter: VTG1Jon StapleyFilter: STDJon StapleyFilter: STDJon StapleyFilter: B&WJon StapleyFilter: STDJon StapleyFilter: STDJon StapleyFilter: VTG1Jon StapleyFilter: STDJon StapleyFilter: VTG1Jon StapleyFilter: VTG2Jon StapleyFilter: STDJon StapleyFilter: STDJon StapleyFilter: STDJon StapleyFilter: VTG2Jon StapleyFilter: STDJon Stapley

As mentioned, a few more filters would have been nice by default — though there is a library of community-made filters to explore, as well as the option to create your own, so that does have the potential to extend the camera's lease on life. Camp Snap also sells its own downloadable add-on packs of filters, which goes some way to explain why there are so few to begin with.

I was excited by the idea of the Xenon flash, but having tested it out, I feel that a hammer is being used to crack a nut here. It is an incredibly powerful unit, much more powerful than the CS-Pro needs, frankly, and every time I have set it to the full-power 'Forced' mode, I have ended up with a blown-out, overexposed mess of an image. Thankfully, the 'Auto' mode does much better, providing balanced exposures that illuminate the subject well.

Flash off.Jon StapleyFlash set to Auto.Jon StapleyFlash set to Forced. You see the issue.Jon StapleyAgain, flash set to Forced. I just wanted a nice picture of my spider-plant, man.Jon Stapley

It also merits mentioning that the shooting experience of the CS-Pro is nice and brisk. One of the common complaints about the original Camp Snap was that it had some truly deleterious shutter lag. This has been corrected for the CS-Pro thanks to an upgraded processor. While there's no burst mode per se, I was able to fire off successive shots at a rate of about 1 per second — the only feature that fell behind, amusingly, was the artificial free-midi-download shutter-release noise. And I can live with that.

Should I buy the Camp Snap CS-Pro?

(Image credit: Jon Stapley)Buy it if...

You want a break from your screens.
Having no LCD for monitoring or playing back your shots keeps you living in the moment — an analog-like experience without the difficulty and expense.

You want an affordable, lightweight compact camera
Incredibly light and commendably cheap, the CS-Pro is a camera you can take everywhere without a worry.

The first Camp Snap was just too low-quality for you.
Operability improvements and a resolution upgrade make this a markedly better shooting experience.

Don't buy it if...

You want creative versatility
You can't change your settings, you can't focus the lens — despite the 'Pro' moniker, this is a point-and-shoot.

You want a tough camera that can handle a knock
It's not weatherproof at all, and I wouldn't rate that all-plastic body to stand up to much punishment.

How I tested the Camp Snap CS-Pro

(Image credit: Jon Stapley)

• I received a loan unit of the Camp Snap CS-Pro for testing
• I have taken it out on a number of photo excursions in London and on a short rural mini-break
• I’ve shot in variable light conditions throughout April and May, with a mixture of bright and overcast weather

So far, I've used the Camp Snap CS-Pro to capture more than 100 images, over a period of several weeks, during which time I took it on several days out in London as well as on a countryside mini-break in Gloucestershire, UK. The weather was quite variable during my time with the camera, though predominantly bright and sunny. I used the CS-Pro indoors and outdoors, and aimed to capture a broad range of subjects and situations.

First reviewed May 2026

It was somewhere between sprinting to capture a flag, evading instructors and shooting moving targets in a Maltese training course during my playthrough of 007 First Light that I realized IO Interactive has managed to make a third person shooter game that truly feels like you’re playing a James Bond in a movie.

Review info

Platform reviewed: PS5 Pro
Available on: PS5, Xbox Series X|S, PC and Nintendo Switch 2
Release date: May 27, 2026, (Nintendo Switch 2 TBC)

The sequence plays out like a classic training montage straight out of a Rocky film, quickly switching you from one exercise to the next. One minute you’re learning hand-to-hand combat mechanics like parrying and throwing your opponent into walls, the next you’re driving around a historical fort looking to set a new record for your fastest lap.

That blockbuster energy runs throughout this reboot, which introduces players to a younger version of the spy before he became 007. Meeting Bond as a fresh-faced, 26-year-old Royal Navy air crewman means there’s no Daniel Craig or Pierce Brosnan shadow hanging over him, making this an original take that shows him still learning when to follow orders and when to improvise.

The heart of the matter

While it's been done before, this training montage sequence is the most creatively put together I've ever seen. (Image credit: IO Interactive)

After washing up on an Icelandic shore as the lone survivor of a helicopter crash, Bond quickly finds himself on an M16 mission without any security clearance or training.

Relying solely on quick reflexes and some Montenegrin he picked up during past travels, it doesn’t take long before he’s recruited into M16 and thrown into a conspiracy involving rogue agents, buried secrets and, as is now a permanent plot device of various action movies of the 21st century (think Minority Report crossed with Mission Impossible — The Final Reckoning), dangerous experimental technology.

Patrick Gibson’s version of Bond is cocky, impulsive and occasionally "a bit of a b***end", as Moneypenny, voiced by Kiera Lester, puts it at one poin. I can't say I don't agree with her, either, after hearing all those repetitive smart ass quips about how enemies take their tea while you lob cups and saucers at them during tense combat sequences — it's more eye-roll inducing than funny.

Often the immaturity works in the game’s favour, though, as this is Bond before the polished charm and cold professionalism fully set in. After all, Bond is more than just a generic run-and-gun action hero — and this is where IO Interactive’s expertise in stealth action games comes in.

Much of the game revolves around learning new ways to stealthily approach situations, from disguising yourself as valet to infiltrate a world chess championship competition to pickpocketing an invitation to get into an exclusive gala in Kensington.

These more open world sections of the game allow for the most experimentation outside of the cutscenes and platforming that features throughout the game, creating an undeniable rhythm.

Missions often begin back at M16 with a briefing from Moneypenny before sending Bond downstairs to the brilliant Q (who’s voiced by Alastair Mackenzie) to field test some new gadgets. From there, you’re deployed into luxury hotels, hostile compounds, crowded marketplaces and snowy mountains, where you almost always manage to devise a cunning escape worthy of an IMAX screen.

A matter of considerable delicacy

Every Bond needs a villain, or two... or three... (Image credit: IO Interactive)

Let’s get one thing out of the way, the stealth sandbox gameplay isn’t quite as open-ended or realistic as IO Interactive's Hitman series. Instead, it’s more of a stripped back version of the studio's gaming DNA.

The core suite of mechanics are here, though, letting you quietly infiltrate guarded areas in several different ways by either bluffing out of conversations or creating distractions to reach your objective unnoticed.

Just don’t expect the same unforgiving realism, where if you look or do something suspicious you’ll immediately trigger the NPCs to be cautious of you, stopping you from progressing and making you restart the level. 007 First Light is much more forgiving — even letting you take down enemies in the same room without others reacting (more on this later).

That’s not say that you don’t have the same varied gameplay, though. The standout mission for me was in Mauritania, where Bond infiltrates a dusty shipping graveyard settlement built around the wreckage of a giant cargo ship in the Sahara Desert. In order to enter a criminal auction, you first need to raise enough money through underground brawls, shooting contests and other side activities scattered around a dense marketplace.

It’s one of the missions where the game fully embraces player freedom, and it feels closest to IO Interactive’s work with Hitman as you don't have to complete every side mission available to progress to the next section, making the level varied enough for multiple playthroughs on different difficulties.

Best bit

My favorite part of 007 First Light was an unassuming moment during an action sequence where I was battling mercenaries while trying to escape a building. After flanking two hostile henchmen, I swiftly shot a red fuel canister clearing the path ahead of me to escape with a confidence that only a truly lethal secret agent could have.

In true Bond fashion, gadgets also play a big role. From hacking electronics to disabling lights with your Omega watch, there's a variety of spy tools that you can access through a gadget wheel reminiscent of Batman: Arkham. These mechanics are crucial to the stealth sections of the game, allowing you to create distractions and progress through locked down buildings.

Punctuating every stealth mission are enormous set pieces very clearly inspired by Naughty Dog's Uncharted series of adventure games that see you evading a sniper's fire while running across rooftops, jumping onto airplanes and car chases that feel ripped straight from a Bond finale. There's even that signature platforming and few puzzles thrown in for good measure.

Against the odds

Please let me drive the Aston Martin Valhalla more next time, IO Interactive. (Image credit: IO Interactive)

At times, though, the game's cinematic action pieces can break that sense of immersion with bugs pre-emptively triggering a cutscene that suddenly repositions Bond to a place he was otherwise nowhere near a moment ago. During one sequence, the game forced Bond onto a mobile staircase because a cutscene had been triggered, despite me being in the middle of a shootout on the other side of the tarmac.

The stealth areas occasionally interrupted the realism, too. For instance, when I was given a 'license to kill', which is the game's shoot-em-up mode, I would abandon stealth entirely to fight my way through, bashing enemies into nearby walls and tables, only for nearby NPCs to seemingly ignore the chaos unfolding in the room they're closely guarding.

While I can fully appreciate the certain restrictions IO Interactive has made to make you play the game in a certain way, I can't help but feel slightly cheated by the driving mechanic. It felt tacked on because of the spy franchise's iconic vehicles and not nearly as dynamic as it could've been — this might very well all be stemming from my frustrations around not being able to drive the Aston Martin Valhalla more than two-feet though, so take it with a pinch of salt as I had been excited to get behind the wheel ever since catching a glimpse of it in M16 headquarters.

Thankfully, these frustrations rarely outweigh the sheer expansiveness of what IO Interactive has created here. 007First Light brings to life what makes Bond so thrilling beyond the explosions, weaving together a multi-layered espionage plot, sophisticated spy toys and stunning locations that you don't want to leave.

While it's stealth gameplay isn't quite as polished as Hitman and its cinematic pacing occasionally cuts through the spell, it's easy to see past. IO Interactive has delivered the most immersive Bond game in years.

Should I play 007 First Light?

I can still hear Sampha's '(No One Knows Me) Like The Piano' since finishing 007 First Light. (Image credit: IO Interactive)Play it if...

You love big campaigns
Expect cinematic action sequences similar to Uncharted threading together a linear narrative that's as multilayered as a Bond movie. View Deal

You want to feel like Bond
Forget drinking martinis, 007 First Light lets you experience nearly every facet of what being Bond entails with a hyper-competence you can dream of. View Deal

You love 007's spycraft
Similar to Batman: Arkham's gadget mechanics, 007 First Light brings to life a variety of classic 007 spy tools from the movies.

Don't play it if...

You're expecting the exact same gameplay as Hitman
IO Interactive has stripped back some of the stealth sandbox mastery from Hitman to create a more streamlined tactical experience.

You can't stand a lot of cutscenes
007 First Light blurs the line of playing a game and watching a movie, with lengthy set pieces that you won't want to skip.

Accessibility

Well, this is a bit different — a baby Bond that doesn't have a signature drink. (Image credit: IO Interactive )

007 First Light has most of the usual controls and accessibility features you'd find on a AAA game, including subtitles, adjustable difficulty settings, which you can change anytime throughout, tutorials, as well as motion and sensitivity controls.

Because the game is so linear, you don't have a map to help guide you through the more sandbox-style levels but that doesn't matter too much as it allows for experimentation to occur.

How I reviewed 007 First Light

Alright then, let's see if there's another way I can raise $100,000. (Image credit: IO Interactive)

I played 007 First Light for just under 20 hours on a PlayStation 5 Pro hooked up to a Sky Glass TV and Sonos sound system made up of two speakers, a soundbar and subwoofer.

I completed the story during that time, and even replayed a couple of sections to test out the variations that could occur depending on the way I played the game. However, I did not unlock everything, so I'm sure there's plenty more worth exploring.

GEEKOM A9 Max 2026: 30-second review

The Geekom A9 Max is one of a growing number of premium AI-enhanced mini PCs, perfectly at home as a powerful office machine for content creation or development, especially for low to mid-level AI applications. Inside is a powerful Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 CPU, and this is coupled with a more standard 890M integrated GPU and NPU to handle all graphics and AI processing.

Removing the small machine from the box, the quality is instantly apparent, with a mainly metal case aside from the black plastic back panel. It’s also good to see a decent amount of venting to keep it cool, even under substantial load.

What I instantly liked about the box was that while it arrives with just 32GB of RAM and a 1TB SSD, it’s perfectly possible to upgrade the machine to 128GB RAM and 8TB storage, and you can even give it a graphics boost by attaching an eGPU. Essentially, this brings the machine close to rivalling many desktops, but at a much smaller size; although the size of the eGPU does have to be taken into account.

The machine also features plenty of connection options, including USB4, for that eGPU or ultra-fast storage, there’s also HDMI 2.1, decent dual 2.5GbE, and Wi-Fi 7. As a photographer and videographer, it's nice to see an SD 4.0 card reader on the side. I'm increasingly using CFexpress Type B and Type A, but since those cards are still quite rare in the mainstream, an SD card reader is still the best option here.

In day-to-day tasks running Windows 11 Pro, this machine is extremely quick, with the full Microsoft Office suite opening and running without issue with the standard configuration. As I moved on, I started using CapCut and installed the Adobe Creative Suite just to see if it could run Adobe Photoshop, Premiere Pro, and a few other advanced applications. Again, it handled 4K video edits without issue with footage from the Canon EOS R5C and quickly enhanced a batch of images shot on the Sony A7 IV in Lightroom. This small machine handled the load with ease.

Through the test I was impressed with the potential power and put this to the test with a video edit. That edit for a 4K production grew in length, and while the machine was able to handle the processing, I could hear the machine being pushed to its limits, and an extra 32GB of RAM would have just helped it over the line for video editing. Still, this performance was impressive. While I did start to see a slowdown in the timeline render times, ultimately, for such a small machine and at this price, this performance is impressive.

One of the big features of this machine is the AI potential. Sure enough, Copilot runs exceptionally well, integrated with Microsoft and Adobe applications, but with a machine like this and with that Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 CPU, which offers up to 86 TOPS of AI performance, with an extra 55 TOPS in the NPU, I was really interested to see how well it would run a local LLM.

Considering the size and the position, I was able to install Qwen 7B, which seemed to run relatively well, I did consider 14B but hit some issues on getting that running. You can tell that Qwen is running on a local machine, and with 32GB of RAM and that limited power from the GPU, there is a slight slowdown.

But it's still impressive, with the chatbot features working well and enabling you to integrate relatively basic tasks, although, at present, that limitation is more down to my knowledge of programming with a local LLM rather than probable potential of what's available here.

I couldn't help feeling that a little more RAM and possibly connecting to an eGPU would have just sped things up a bit, but having this run completely offline does start to show the potential.

Finishing off the test, I wanted just to see how well it would run some of the larger games, including Cyberpunk 2077 and Hogwarts Legacy, and in both cases, the Radeon 890M GPU proved why it's such a popular choice, offering smooth gameplay at HD resolution with mid effects and graphics quality. Again, with the potential to connect an eGPU and boost the RAM, if you do want to use this as a gaming machine, the potential is absolutely here.

While powerful mini PCs have been around for a while, the GEEKOM A9 Max 2026 Edition really shows just how far they've come. This machine really does rival a desktop, and whilst it does get warm under load, it manages to see it through without any notable thermal throttling.

If you are editing video or using any other application or process that really puts a load on the CPU and GPU, those fans are going to kick in. If you like a quiet working environment, this might not be the machine for you.

However, there's no doubting its power and potential, and with a little bit more RAM and connected to an eGPU, this small machine is definitely able to rival many machines far larger, although with those additions, the price is pretty much on a par, and the benefit all comes down to the space you save from the small-form-factor machine. With that in mind, it's likely to feature in our guide to the best mini PCs.

GEEKOM A9 Max 2026: Price and availability

• How much does it cost? £1599 / $1799
• When is it out? Now
• Where can you get it? Directly from GEEKOM

The Geekom A9 Max 2026 Edition is widely available, with the base HX370 configuration starting at $1399 from Geekom's US site and £1299 from Geekom UK.

The mini PC is also available from Amazon.com and Amazon.co.uk.

TechRadar Pro readers can save an extra 8% via Geekom or Amazon when using the code TRA9MAX26.

Note: In the US, to get the discount on the HX470 model, use code TRA9AMZUS.

• Value: 4/5

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)GEEKOM A9 Max 2026: Specs

CPU: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
Graphics: AMD Radeon 890M
RAM: 32GB DDR5, expandable up to 128GB.
Storage: 2TB SSD; supports 1 × M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 NVMe and 1 × M.2 2230 PCIe 4.0 NVMe, up to 8TB total.
Front Ports: Power button, 3.5mm headset jack, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports, including one always-on port.
Rear Ports: DC input, 2 × HDMI 2.1, 2 × USB4 Type-C, 2 × 2.5GbE RJ45, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, USB 2.0 Type-A, Kensington lock.
Connectivity: Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, dual 2.5GbE LAN.
Audio: HDA codec, 3.5mm front headset jack.
Camera: None.
Size: 135 × 132 × 46.9mm.
OS Installed: Windows 11 Pro

GEEKOM A9 Max 2026: Design

The Geekom A9 Max 2026 Edition is right at the top of the mini PC market, with a premium build and price tag to match. The top and sides are made with a full reinforced metal chassis, which has been made to stand up to 200kg of pressure, essentially meaning that in the studio or office, it will just look like a premium PC, but if, for some reason, you use it in the field, it should be robust enough to withstand a good knock or two.

When it comes to size it measures 135 × 132 × 46.9mm. While the build is premium and the machine is on the larger side of the mini PC form factor, it still features the usual VESA mount options at the back, making it easy to mount behind your monitor.

Around the body of the machine there’s a good amount of ports and with the premium focus, high-speed networking is a priority, featuring dual 2.5GbE LAN ports, Wi-Fi 7, and Bluetooth version 5.4.

Alongside all the usual ports, which I come to in a minute, there are two additional slots. The first is an SD card reader, which will appeal to many creators but is increasingly appealing to office workers who also need to shoot video and take images in their day-to-day tasks. There's also a Kensington lock slot if you do need to make sure the mini PC is secure.

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

When it comes to port layout, there's a good number of ports, though it is a bit of a shame there's no USB-C on the front. Instead, you have three USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports and one USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A that is marked as always on. There's also a standard 3.5mm headphone jack and the power button. Switching round the back, you've obviously got the DC power in.

This is an 18V standard plug and HDMI 2.1, a USB Type-C that supports DP Alt Mode and PD-in, which is handy if you're using this out in the field. Then there are 2 × 2.5 GbE RJ45 LAN ports, a USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A port, a USB 2.0 Type-A port, a USB Type-C DP Alt Mode port, and another HDMI 2.1 port, so a really good selection of ports. It's great to see you've got two USB4 ports at the back, enabling both ultra-fast storage and an eGPU if you need to boost graphics performance.

With those two HDMI and two USB4 ports, if you do want to run a 4x4K display setup or a single 8K monitor, this is perfectly possible with that port selection.

• Design: 4.5 / 5

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)GEEKOM A9 Max 2026: Features

Inside are the mechanics of the machine, with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, 12 cores, 24 threads, up to 5.2GHz boost, and up to 86 TOPS overall AI performance at the heart, along with an integrated Radeon 890M GPU with 16 graphics cores and RDNA 3.5 architecture, and an NPU. This is supported by 32GB DDR5 RAM, upgradable to 128GB, and 8TB NVMe SSD modules.

Like most mini PCs, it comes pre-installed with Windows 11 Pro. When the machine arrives, all you need to do is run the final installation steps to register accounts and customise a few settings to your needs.

A first look at the specifications shows is a quite meagre allocation of RAM and storage: just 32GB of DDR5 RAM and 2TB of M.2 NVMe SSD storage, both of which can be upgraded, but in a machine of this price I would have hoped for a little more.

The RAM, can be upgraded to 128GB with two 64GB modules, providing dual-channel memory and making it ideal for AI models and other applications that require ample RAM. Then, for storage, you have one M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 ×4 NVMe SSD slot and an additional M.2 2230 PCIe 4.0 NVMe, each supporting up to 4TB, so you can boost the internal capacity to a relatively decent 8TB.

It is worth noting that while this machine comes pre-loaded with Windows 11 Pro, you can install Linux or another operating system of your choice; it is perfectly compatible. If you just want to run it as an AI box on Windows 11 Pro, it makes a perfect platform for development.

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

• Features: 4.5 / 5 (Will change once features are available)

GEEKOM A9 Max 2026: Performance

When it comes to day-to-day use, I really felt this machine is at the top of the premium mini PC market, and being powered by the Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 ensures that, when running Windows 11 Pro, everything runs well.

As I started out with Microsoft Office, firstly to write this review but also for a few other tasks, both in Excel and PowerPoint, the machine ran beautifully, smoothly switching between apps as I needed, and handling images with ease with no slowdown or issue. Essentially, this machine is more than powerful enough for any office application and for some pretty heavy-duty lifting in each of the individual apps, which, to be honest, these days is expected.

Whilst checking through the benchmark test results, I was a little bit surprised to see that it only scored a Windows Experience score of 8.1, but what was more reflective was the PCMark score of 8090, showing that, for day-to-day tasks, this machine is absolutely ideally suited.

As I started increasing the pressure on the system, I switched to Lightroom Classic and CapCut, both relatively lightweight applications. Starting with Lightroom Classic and creating a large catalogue containing over 800 images shot on the Sony A7 IV, both JPEG and raw, the machine had absolutely no issue handling the task, and whilst the internal hard drive is only 2TB, the CrystalDiskMark read and write scores of 6190MB per second for read and 5524MB per second for write were more than adequate to quickly render thumbnails and enable speedy adjustments.

Later on, through the test, as I was transferring video files from the Canon EOS R5C, that speed of transfer was really apparent, although that 2TB internal SSD was a bit of an issue, so I installed another 1TB drive just to boost that internal storage for the video editing test.

Aside from the internal SSD being exceptionally quick, what was noticeable was just how fast applications loaded; both Photoshop and Premiere Pro were relatively quick, taking under 10 seconds from double-clicking the application icon to being ready to start work. Likewise, when importing files into Premiere Pro, the media thumbnails rendered nicely and quickly as the timeline progressed or was scrubbed through.

For the most part, the video editing was handled well, and in Premiere Pro, I was able to cut several hours of footage into a five-minute video. However, since the total video file size exceeded 2TB of internal storage, I attached an external SSD via the USB4 port to handle the additional capacity. Here, the USB4 speed was absolutely spot-on for video production, enabling me to work with files on external drives as if they were on the fast internal drive.

During editing, it was apparent there's only 32GB of RAM in the system, and I would definitely think of upgrading to at least 64GB, if not the full 128GB, if I were going to use this for video editing. However, for images processed in Photoshop and Lightroom, that 32GB is actually perfectly adequate, and I'd only really upgrade to 64GB just to give myself a little extra headroom.

If you're just using Lightroom Classic and CapCut, for instance, then that 32GB and 2TB SSD will more than likely suffice. If you're pushing things a little further and using something like a Sony A7 or another high-end mirrorless camera, I’d definitely look at either an external storage solution or upgrading the internal capacity and RAM. However, it's reassuring to know that the CPU and GPU can handle most people's creative needs.

But what's good to know is that because it has USB4, if you do need to push the graphics potential further and you're working on longer productions, say over 15 minutes, then you can attach an external eGPU through that USB4 port, which will give you far more potential.

One of the key features here is the built-in NPU and AI potential of the Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 CPU, which is supported by the lesser 890M GPU. In both Photoshop and Premiere Pro, utilising the AI features such as timeline expands and generative fill, and utilising local resources rather than cloud, the machine was actually able to cope with that AI processing exceptionally well, taking a few seconds to expand timelines and about 10 seconds to generatively fill when cropped on a rotation.

Of course, a popular choice for the built-in AI hardware is so that you can run a local LLM. If you're just looking to start experimentation with localised models such as Qwen 2.5 7B, which I found was a good fit for this 32GB version, then this is a great place to start. You can essentially set up your own localised chatbot that doesn't need to rely on a cloud connection to work, but more interestingly, you can start to use it to develop your own AI applications.

At a base level, you can get the LLM to help you create a website, write code for you, and I was interested to see if it could create a static HTML site. It could be updated by connecting to GitHub and Cloud Pages. What's interesting here is that there was some tweaking, even though I hadn't fully automated the process. The LLM, which was running locally, was able to use a local web server to develop and run the application, and as I worked on the project, I realised it was more my own personal knowledge of the system rather than the abilities of the machine that was the limitation of what I was developing.

However, the upshot is that the AI potential runs locally; it takes a bit of fiddling to set up, as ever. Once running, it gives you a real good insight into this machine’s potential. Once again, as with creative applications, I would definitely upgrade the RAM to handle that AI process and probably attach a GPU just to give it a boost. At present, whilst that 890M GPU is a good standard, it is starting to look a little dated, given the full potential of how we're using our machines.

Checking out the scores in 3DMark and Geekbench, it was interesting to see the GPU score in Geekbench. The GPU came out at 34,145, not a bad result for an integrated GPU and more than enough for playing many games at HD resolution.

Sure enough, when loading Indiana Jones and the Great Circle, I was able to enjoy some pretty smooth gameplay. In some of the games I played, both Indiana Jones and Cyberpunk 2077, the official GPU specifications are actually higher than what is on offer here. However, the gameplay is still exceptionally well handled thanks to that CPU's power.

Benchmark results

CrystalDiskMark Read: 6190.03
CrystalDiskMark Write: 5524.9
Geekbench CPU Multi: 12069
Geekbench CPU Single: 2922
Geekbench GPU: 34145
PCMark Overall: 8090
Cinebench CPU Multi: 4668
Cinebench CPU Single: 495
Fire Strike Overall: 5141
Fire Strike Graphics: 5544
Fire Strike Physics: 30903
Fire Strike Combined: 1839
Time Spy Overall: 2424
Time Spy Graphics: 2149
Time Spy CPU: 8906
Wild Life Overall: 12516
Steel Nomad Overall: 2165
Windows Experience Overall: 8.1

Getting back to work, this time loading DaVinci Resolve to do some colour grading, it was interesting to see how well the machine handled quite intensive grading on video footage before exporting. You can once again see a bit of lag due to the 32GB of RAM, but ultimately, it's impressive for a machine of this size, and if a GPU were connected, this would definitely rival far larger workstation PCs.

Again, when running Blender, I had to create some 3D models for an upcoming 3D print to test the machine. It was more than capable of handling quite sophisticated modelling requirements, and I was impressed with just how easy it was to work within the application compared with what I'm used to on my MacBook Pro M1 Max, which has for years been my chosen option for utilising Blender. Again, there's no doubt that a bit of an eGPU boost would have been appreciated, but this machine is more than useful right out of the box.

At the end of the test, it's obvious why this is a premium mini PC and not just because of the cost. The design is exceptionally well thought out, simple and functional, rather than going for some sleek, stylish design. What impressed me was that, even under load, when the fans kick in, the noise stays at a reasonable level and the machine stays cool. There's no thermal throttling, or at least no notable thermal throttling through the test, especially when using the video editors, which is usually where you can start to see a real slowdown in the timeline as it builds in length.

Whilst I'm relatively new to using these small machines for LLM models, I am slowly getting to grips with running similar systems on network-attached storage. It's great to see the speed boost I'm getting from these mini PCs. At present, the processing speed of that LLM model is far faster on this A9 Max 2026 Edition than I've seen on most other options.

So, overall, from productivity to creativity to running your own localised LLM, at present, the Geekom A9 Max seems like an exceptionally good option.

• Performance: 4.5 / 5

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)GEEKOM A9 Max 2026: Final verdict

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

By the end of this test, there's no doubt that the price reflects the specifications and performance of this mini PC, and it's a great choice if you're a heavy-process Windows user and you just want a small box that sits on your desk behind your monitor rather than a full-blown desktop workstation.

It’s worth pointing out that if you want to see this machine's full potential, connect it to an eGPU, boost the RAM and internal storage, but still, the 32GB, 2TB version that I'm looking at in this review is exceptionally powerful and, for creative use, was able to plough through video editing and image enhancement without issue.

What impressed me most was the localised potential of AI. Being able to download and install a local language model and use it both for chat and for a few more advanced creative options was good to see, as it showed just how well these local language models work and how stable they can be in your own offline environment.

Running a local LLM isn't quite as straightforward as most of the applications, and the download and install process does take a little bit of working out, especially when you want to start connecting it to external resources. But this machine and its processing speed do make that a little easier, and the potential, if you are looking for a local AI development machine, is exceptionally good.

Of course, the reason you go for a mini PC over a full desktop is that it saves a lot of space and is often a lot cheaper. However, here, whilst the size of the mini PC is compact, once you connect an eGPU and external SSD, and upgrade the RAM and internal storage, the pricing really does sit directly alongside a standard workstation, so it's really only if you are strapped for space that you probably want to go for the fully specced-out option.

But then it’s ultra-portable, so if you're working in the field for video or image production and you need a really powerful machine to take with you, not just a laptop, then this is a superb solution, and plenty of connectivity options on both the front and back make it extremely flexible. I do wish, however, that it had at least one USB-C port on the front, not just tucked away at the back.

The network connection was also pretty good at 2.5 GbE, and with your options, it's easy to connect directly to a NAS box as well as the network, which gives you plenty of user options.

If you're looking for workstation performance in a compact box, then the GEEKOM A9 Max 2026 Edition is a superb option. It's small, fast and has loads of potential, not just for Windows productivity but also for creative and local LLM use.

Whilst there's no doubting the performance of this machine, the price does make me think you are paying a premium for its small size, and for most people who have enough space for a workstation, that's probably going to be a cheaper option. However, if you're strapped for space in your office or workshop, or you need a machine that's fully portable and extremely powerful, then this is a great solution.

If you really want to push this model to the max, max out the capacity and RAM, and attach a decent eGPU, there's no doubt the GEEKOM A9 Max 2026 Edition will match most mid-level workstations without issue.

Should I buy the GEEKOM A9 Max 2026?

Value

Premium build with a good selection of ports, but it is exceptionally expensive for a mini PC

4/5

Design

I love the understated design. It fits easily on your desktop, and with the VESA mount, can be discreetly positioned

4.5/5

Features

A huge range of features for a mini PC and, best of all, plenty of upgrade potential 

4.5/5

Performance

Incredibly fast and perfect for most user workloads, especially if you're looking for AI development or creative use

4.5/5

Overall

Powerful mini PC that rivals the performance of many workstations, but does come with a price premium

4.5/5

Buy it if...

Need compact power

If you need the power of a workstation in a compact, potentially portable form, this is an ideal option.

Use many displays

If you need a mini PC connected to multiple displays, the dual HDMI and USB4 ports let you connect up to 4 4K displays directly from the back of this small machine.

Don't buy it if...

Need a gaming GPU

While you can play games at those lower resolutions and enjoy perfectly smooth performance, if you want the full immersive gaming experience, you'll also need to consider an eGPU, as the Radeon 890M is good but does have its limits.

Only browse casually

For many users, the power and speed of this machine will probably be overkill, and whilst it is nice to know that you've got all that power in the background, there are plenty of cheaper options out there.

For more productivity machines, we've tested the best business computers.

MSI MPG 322UR QD-OLED X24: One-minute review

Exactly two years ago, MSI rolled out its debut 4K OLED gaming monitor. Now here we are with the new MSI MPG 322UR QD-OLED X24, one of the first gaming monitors to get Samsung's newly upgraded 4K QD-OLED panel tech.

Superficially, of course, this 32-inch 4K gaming monitor is a dead ringer for its direct predecessors from MSI, most obviously the MSI MPG 321URX. It sports exactly the same chassis design, for instance, and a mostly similar feature set. But that new QD-OLED panel makes this a rather different proposition.

The resolution and refresh rate actually remain the same. So, that's 3,840 by 2,160 pixels and 240Hz maximum refresh, the latter being plenty for a 4K display. You're not going to be able to drive it beyond that speed in most games. The response times are carried over, too, which is just fine given we're talking about a lightning-quick rating of 0.03ms.

So, what exactly is different? The first hint that you've got Samsung's latest five-layer Tandem QD-OLED tech is in the full-screen brightness rating. That's up from 250 nits for previous 32-inch 4K QD-OLEDs to 300 nits. And while the peak HDR brightness remains pegged at 1,000 nits, the VESA DisplayHDR certification has been bumped up from True Black 400 to True Black 500, indicating more HDR punch.

All of that is enabled by a new third-gen emissive OLED material which Samsung also says is twice as durable as before. That's important because it means this new QD-OLED should be even more resistant to burn-in, a potential if unlikely problem that's also covered by the three-year warranty.

(Image credit: Future)

Another feature of the new panel is a revised surface material that reduces the purple tint in bright ambient light that all QD-OLEDs have thus far exhibited. MSI calls it Dark Armor Film and while it doesn't entirely eradicate the issue, black levels and perceived contrast are definitely improved.

However, there is one new-gen QD-OLED feature missing from this revised 32-inch 4K panel. The true RGB-stripe subpixel structure, as seen in another MSI monitor we reviewed recently, the MSI MPG 341CQR QD-OLED X36, isn't included here. On paper, RGB-stripe is desirable for precision rendering, especially fonts. In practice, this 32-inch 4K monitor has sufficient pixel density to make that a pretty moot point. It's very crisp and precise.

Whatever, the overall result of the upgrades is, if anything, more impressive than the incremental spec improvements imply. This is a gorgeous, vibrant monitor. Importantly, it's much richer and subjectively punchier than similar monitors based on LG's competing WOLED panel tech.

Full-screen SDR brightness is likewise now strong enough for almost all realistic use cases. But the real showbiz stuff is HDR gaming. The combination of 4K pixel density with the speed, contrast, lighting precision and outright pop of Samsung's latest QD-OLED tech, all heightened by the glossy screen coating, is downright fabulous.

Long story short, this new 4K QD-OLED panel really is approaching something akin to the perfect 2D display technology. There are still a few detail weaknesses. But overall, this 4K MSI beauty absolutely wallops any similar LCD display. It's not even close.

MSI MPG 322UR QD-OLED X24: Price & availability

• How much does it cost? $1,099 / £999 / AU$1,799
• When is it available? Available now
• Where can you get it? Available in the US, UK, and Australia

At $1,099, the new MSI MPG 322UR X24 is a touch more expensive than MSI's first 32-inch 4K QD-OLED monitor at launch two years ago. But you do get a much improved panel.

It's also a fair bit cheaper than the likes of the Asus ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM Gen3, which uses exactly the same Samsung-sourced new-gen QD-OLED panel, but goes for about $1,299.

Of course, this is still a pretty expensive display. That's the reality with OLED technology right now. You have to pay a hefty premium versus LCD-based monitors of the same size and resolution. However, it's worth noting that there's a good chance that MSI will launch a slightly de-featured but cheaper-still variant of this monitor in the near future.

• Value: 3 / 5

MSI MPG 322UR QD-OLED X24: SpecsMSI MPG 322UR QD-OLED X24 Specifications

Screen size

32-inch

Resolution

3840 x 2160

Panel technology

Samsung QD-OLED

Refresh rate

240Hz

Response time

0.03ms

HDR

DisplayHDR 500 True Black

Brightness

300 nits full screen, 1,000 nits peak HDR

Connectivity

HDMI 2.1 x2, DisplayPort 2.1a, USB-C with 98W PD, 2x USB-A hub

MSI MPG 322UR QD-OLED X24: Design

• Familiar looks
• Good connectivity
• Reassuring warranty cover

In terms of styling, little has changed with the new MSI MPG 322UR X24. It looks just like the MSI MPG 321URX did back at launch two years ago.

It's not the most striking monitor design. But it's pretty well built and slick enough thanks to slim bezels and a low-key, all-black design ethic. You also get a good range of adjustment, including tilt, height, swivel, rotate and pivot, albeit the latter doesn't go all the way round into portrait mode.

As for connectivity, that includes a pair of HDMI 2.1 sockets, DisplayPort 2.1, a USB-C interface with 98 watts of power delivery and a two-port USB-A hub. The USB-C connectivity means you can share this monitor between, say, a gaming desktop and a work laptop with particular ease and minimal cable clutter.

(Image credit: Future)

Burn-in, of course, remains somewhat of a worry with OLED display technology, even if several third party long-term tests have shown that it's not a major problem with Samsung's QD-OLED tech. So, it's good to see that MSI has included several burn-in compensating features such as pixel shifting. You also get burn-in cover as part of MSI's three-year warranty. At minimum, you needn't have any concerns during the warranty period.

Finally, fans of glossy screen coatings will be pleased to learn that the MSI MPG 322UR X24 comes so equipped. It certainly heightens the visual impact of QD-OLED panel technology, even if that comes at the cost of increased reflectivity. In short, glossy screen coatings are a preference thing, they have pros and cons.

(Image credit: Future)

• Design: 4 / 5

MSI MPG 322UR QD-OLED X24: Performance

• Fantastic new QD-OLED panel
• Stupendous HDR experience
• Full-screen brightness now "good enough"

Samsung's first effort at a 32-inch 4K QD-OLED panel for PC gaming monitors was pretty stellar but had a few arguable issues, including somewhat limited full-screen brightness and a purple tint that was visible in bright ambient light.

The MSI MPG 322UR X24 upgrades that experience with a new generation of QD-OLED technology that directly addresses those shortcomings. And it really is closing in on QD-OLED perfection.

First up, there's the overall vibrancy and punch. The full-screen SDR experience is now surely good enough for the vast majority of use cases and preferences. It's worth noting that the full-screen experience is, if anything, subjectively better than the official 300 nit rating implies.

The panel contrast still suffers a little in really bright ambient light. (Image credit: Future)

That's because, unlike LG's competing WOLED tech which relies on additional white subpixels to achieve its peak brightness rating, Samsung QD-OLED panels are pure RGB tech. Long story short, QD-OLED panels have better colour brightness and this MSI monitor has some serious SDR zing as a consequence.

Of course, where it really delivers is with HDR content and games. It really is hard to overstate how much better this monitor is than any LCD-based panel, even one with full-array local dimming, when it comes to the HDR experience. This new QD-OLED panel takes the usual advantage of OLED panel tech, which is perfect per-pixel lighting, and adds even more punch and sizzle. It's spectacular.

For this monitor, MSI has also implemented its EOTF boost mode technology. It's designed to combine the best aspects of both the VESA HDR 400 calibrated mode with the HDR Peak 1000 nits mode and give the highest brightness and image detail for both darker and brighter HDR gaming scenes. In short, it does just that and means you can use EOTF boost mode for all HDR content and be confident you're getting a good experience.

Of course, along with all that goodness specific to the latest QD-OLED tech, you're also getting the razor-sharp image detail and pixel density of 4K on a 32-inch panel. It's an incredible combination, and the overall result is genuinely spectacular.

So, is it perfect? Not quite. The new panel film does indeed reduce the purple tint of QD-OLED technology in bright light. But it doesn't entirely remove it. Apart from that, well, you really are into nit-picking territory. The panel's color temperature remains just a touch warm. And the concerns I mentioned around burn-in will remain in the context of really long term use. But this monitor truly is the art of QD-OLED panel tech very nearly perfected.

• Performance: 4.5 / 5

Should you buy the MSI MPG 322UR QD-OLED X24?MSI MPG 322UR QD-OLED X24 scorecard

Value

At $1,099, the MSI MPG 322UR QD-OLED X24 isn't exactly cheap. But then, what 4k 32-inch OLED gaming monitor is? At least this new MSI has Samsung's latest and most impressive 4K QD-OLED tech.

3.5 / 5

Design

MSI hasn't changed much, design-wise, versus the previous model. But that's mostly a good thing and includes excellent connectivity.

4 / 5

Performance

The new-gen Samsung QD-OLED panel is a zinger. It's punchier, the purple tint problem is reduced and all the usual 4K OLED goodness remains.

5 / 5

Final score

This is not a cheap monitor. But it is as close to a flawless 4K OLED experience as you can currently get.

4.5 / 5

Buy the MSI MPG 322UR QD-OLED X24 if...

You want the ultimate 4K OLED experience
The MSI MPG 322UR QD-OLED X24 packs Samsung's new-gen 4K QD-OLED panel and it's definitely closing in on perfection.

You want a true HDR experience
Forget every LCD monitor, ever. This is the way HDR is meant to be experienced.

Don't buy it if...

You're into multi-tasking
While this is a fairly large 32-inch display, there's no doubting ultrawide monitors do multi-tasking better.

You want a real bargain
OLED monitors are generally expensive. The new-gen QD-OLED panel in this one adds a further premium.

• Originally reviewed in May 2026

The Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 aims to keep the premium chair styling of some of Sihoo’s other chairs while also being a bit more wallet-friendly. Not everyone has north of $1,000 to drop on an ergonomic chair, and for those who do, they likely don’t want to spend it on just any chair; they want to make sure it’s a good value.

That’s where the C300 Pro V2 comes in. This chair obviously reminds me a lot of the other Sihoo Doro chairs I have tested. But it also reminds me of the Hinomi line of chairs, with a thousand areas to adjust to make it comfortable.

Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2: Unboxing and First Impressions

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future )

My unboxing experience for the Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 was unique in a few ways. First of all, I had to have two delivered. My first model had a damaged wheel, but when flagging to Sihoo, they sent me a second chair.

Once I got the second chair, I had just assembled one of the fastest and easiest chairs (of the ones I had to actually assemble, some come fully assembled), so my tolerance for building is slightly tweaked. That being said, assembly took a full 30 minutes, with about 8 minutes just for unboxing everything. Sihoo has always been a company with many pieces, and they ensure that every piece is properly packaged individually, resulting in a lot of material to remove from the individual elements before assembly.

While assembling, I noticed that the letters on the included diagram did not match anything on the pieces, but instead matched the diagram. I then had to refer to the diagram to confirm which screw type to use, for example. Also, I was slightly frustrated and slowed down by having to use the included hand tool instead of my Hoto Tools screwdriver.

Once built, the chair feels high-quality, the materials seem likely to last, and there’s no squeaking or creaking. So now the question remains, is the build time worth the comfort of the chair? I think it’s worth consideration.

Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2: Design & Build Quality

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future )

The Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 is mostly a sleek, elegant white mesh, with a PU-coated armrest and a rigid frame. The chair itself is quite comfortable, all while looking very modern and clean. It’s not your average office chair, nor your average cheap Amazon home office seat. Nay, this is a high-brow, powerful-feeling office chair that feels like it belongs in NASA, not in a home office.

While using this chair, I haven’t noticed any wobble or shake, and I haven't had any concerns about base stability, rolling wheels, or leaning back. While this may not be the look that everyone wants, the comfort is hard to deny. I remember the first round of Sihoo Doro chairs that I tested. I was genuinely impressed by how comfortable the spaceship-like chair felt, even on long days.

The mesh seating provides a good balance of support and comfort. The seat doesn't feel like a hammock, which is always a good sign for more expensive chairs. In general, there aren’t any spots that feel cheap or plasticky. Which could be a bit shocking. Not because Sihoo has a bad rap, but because this chair has a ton of moving parts, and that many moving parts could easily result in squeaks, loose tolerances between parts, and so on. But again, what is fantastic is that this has not been the case with the C300 Pro V2 yet.

Another thing to note is that this is a massive chair. I’ve tested a lot of chairs, and some just feel robust, some feel quaint. This chair feels beyond robust. It feels like the difference between a RAM 1500 and a base Ford F-150, or an iPad Pro 13-inch with a Magic Keyboard vs an iPad Air with a thin folio.

Some of the chairs that I have recently tested and am currently testing, along with the C300 Pro V2, are significantly narrower and less… intense… for lack of a better term. Next to a smaller desk, say a 24-inch or even a 48-inch desk, this chair will look massive. But if you have a larger desk, perhaps in the 60-inch range or beyond, this chair will probably fit right in, depending, of course, on some other variables too.

Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2: In use

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future )

I’ve had this chair back for about a week and a half after getting the replacement unit. So far, after several hours a day using this, I haven’t had any discomfort. It took me a little while to dial the chair in; with so many adjustable options, I kept wanting to make sure every setting was dialed in.

Personally, I see the benefit of the multi-functional armrests for some, but since I am not a gamer, I just keep them in the same general spot. But if you want to use this as an after-hours gaming chair or relaxation chair, too, you’ll be set.

The lumbar support is nice, and I do feel a good amount of support in my upper back when seated, too, though it doesn’t hit me at 6’1” exactly where I wish it did. But if you’re a tad shorter, it would probably be perfect for your lower back.

One thing I absolutely love on chairs like this, though, is the breathable mesh. I’ll say it time and time again: I run warm, so sitting in some of these very soft, non-mesh chairs I have, as comfortable as they are, I feel like I am sweating within a few minutes. With the mesh on the C300 Pro V2, though, I feel like my body can breathe even for long working sessions.

I’ve used this chair for intense writing sessions, leaning back a bit during virtual internal meetings with my team, more alert and focused in client meetings, and while working on project management and other tasks. Unless I am 100% locked in, which does happen pretty frequently, I am fairly fidgety. My leg is bouncing, my feet are moving, and I find myself twisting a little in my chair, even. So far, with all my movements, I haven't heard a creak or a squeak.

Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2: Final verdict

(Image credit: Collin Probst // Future )

At the end of the day, this is a spectacular chair when you sit in it. The hesitations come with the build time, the complexity, and the design language, but primarily because it’s a distinct chair. It doesn't blend in and takes up a lot of space. So, if you’re the kind of person who likes that, this may be a dream come true, but if not, then this may not be the chair for you, and that’s okay.

However, if you do want a more robust chair, if you have the space for it, and you want a chair that you can fiddle with to make fit your every possible position of work play rest and everything in-between, then this may just be exactly what you are looking for.

Collin Probst // Future Collin Probst // Future Collin Probst // Future Collin Probst // Future Collin Probst // Future Collin Probst // Future Collin Probst // Future Collin Probst // Future Collin Probst // Future Collin Probst // Future Collin Probst // Future Collin Probst // Future Collin Probst // Future Collin Probst // Future

For more top-performers, we've tested the best office chairs.

Admit it. It’s okay; we’ve all thought about it: upping sticks, going off grid, and living the vanlife. But the wanderlust usually wears off once we start to consider the impracticalities and its unglamorous aspects. Outbound doesn’t share that sour-faced realism, though. Its vision of leaving the rat race and immersing oneself wholly in nature is purely positive.

Review info

Platform reviewed: PC
Available on: PS5, Xbox Series X|S, Nintendo Switch 2, Nintendo Switch, PC
Release date: May 11, 2026 (PC, Xbox); May 14, 2026 (PS5, Switch / Switch 2)

This is a ‘survival’ game where surviving is no trouble at all; it’s just you and your camper (and potentially a companion or three), cruising the wilderness with nary a care in the world.

I, for one, have been waiting for a game like this, and judging by its art style and mechanics — not to mention the dog — it looked to be exactly what I was looking for. Having now played it, I can confirm that it succeeds in painting an idyllic picture of vanlife — to an extent.

On the road

(Image credit: Future)

You begin by choosing your van type and creating your character. Of the former, there are three to choose from, varying in their extension capabilities, carrying weight, and handling. You can also choose any base and accent colors you like.

There are a good number of customization options for your character, with face and hair types. There are also various accessories available, including painted fingernails. Oh, and there are shoes that look exactly like Crocs, which is a win in my book (look, they’re the perfect summer shoe, okay, and I won’t hear otherwise). Clothing options are more limited, though.

Once you’ve made your choices, you’re thrust onto the open road for a short drive before pulling up into a scenic parking lot in the middle of what looks like a North American national park. This lot is the site of the Outbound’s mini tutorial, tasking you with downloading a blueprint for a wrench from a nearby signal tower, crafting it, and using it to open the barrier to the map proper.

(Image credit: Future)

There’s no story here. No reason given as to why you’re journeying around in your van, other than a couple of lines of monologue at the start about leaving the city behind. There are various notes strewn about the map written by inhabitants, but these merely serve as gameplay hints rather than expounding some kind of overt narrative.

The whole game is rendered in a cell-shaded style, with a vibrant color palette that complements the tone of the game perfectly. Textures are simple but detailed, just enough to offer some semblance of realism, while landscapes on the horizon adopt a cardboard cutout look. The environment can get surprisingly atmospheric, too, especially as night falls, which really helps to sell the idyll of living deep within nature.

This soft aesthetic extends to the music, which is understated and wholesome, if a little anonymous. It drifts in and out rather than playing constantly, although there are occasions when it cuts off abruptly.

Sound effects are well placed and sufficiently detailed to feel immersive, from the cacophony of birdsong to the crackle of campfires. When rain falls, it sounds great both outside when it hits the ground and inside when it hits the roof of your van. And since your van is electric, all you hear as you drive along is the sound of the tires rustling over rough terrain, which I found oddly relaxing. Occasionally, your character will say something to give hints or after completing an action, but these are a little too generic to inject much personality or color.

The game’s map is large and expansive, mixing dirt roads and open forest with rocky canyons, streams, and waterfalls. There are also various man-made structures, from towers to treehouses, acting as points of progression.

The map screen itself is vibrant and detailed, with a rustic, hand-drawn appearance that’s clear and readable. It also tracks player locations in real time, which, as someone with a shocking sense of direction, I welcome.

Camp n’ craft

(Image credit: Future)

Outbound is upfront about its laid-back nature. There are no time constraints; you’re encouraged to play at your own pace and explore as you see fit. I did find the day/night cycle a little too fast, but thankfully, you can adjust this.

Attending to your needs is easy. In fact, you only have one, and that’s to feed yourself. What’s more, food is plentiful. There aren’t any real fail states, either. If your health reaches zero, as a result of fall damage or standing in a campfire for too long, the screen merely fades to black and declares that “you fainted,” before respawning you to the next day, with a quarter of your health replenished.

Best bit

(Image credit: Future)

That beautiful world. Exploring the varied and picturesque environments while driving or on foot is a meditative and sometimes awe-inspiring experience.

The typical survival gameplay loop is adhered to. You collect resources for crafting and explore the environment, which in Outbound means finding signal towers for downloading crafting blueprints and investigating landmarks for more rewards.

Managing the inventories of your backpack and van storage is easy, thanks to the clear interface of both. You can easily dump everything you’re carrying in the former into the latter with a single input. And if you want to prevent certain items from transferring, you can lock them to your backpack, which is a welcome convenience.

(Image credit: Future)

You can also go around the map lighting campfires, although I failed to see the point of doing so, other than to tick them off your list. They offer no special benefits or features, other than letting you sit down in a chair and gaze into the flames.

Driving is fun and fluid. Your vehicle is easy to control, yet feels weighty enough to feel realistic, and provides a soft challenge to make it feel satisfying. You can also change to a third-person camera angle while driving, which helps when manoeuvring in tight spots.

One annoying aspect of driving, though, is getting in and out. It’s a two-stage process requiring you to first open the door, then sit on the seat. This soon becomes a nuisance as you frequently hop in and out to gather resources on the roadside.

To gather certain resources, you’ll need various tools. Once you’ve acquired their blueprint, you can craft them in your van’s workshop. You’ll have to complete a simple minigame where you click in time with on-screen prompts, but there’s no punishment for getting this wrong. Tools can then be upgraded to tackle different types of rocks, logs, and shrubs.

(Image credit: Future)

The hammer tool gives you access to the base building menu. There are a fair number of options here, letting you build cabinets, shelves, and extensions on top of and outside your van. Cosmetically, many of these assets are quite basic, but they have their own simple charm.

You can also build various bits of machinery in your van to craft more materials. You feed them resources, and they work on churning out their outputs in the background, freeing you up to go about other tasks.

Naturally, these machines — along with the drivechain — require your van’s battery to be sufficiently powered. As you expand your van’s capabilities, you’ll require more and more power, and it’s this aspect that you perhaps need to be most mindful of in Outbound, as you can quickly find yourself out of charge.

Thankfully, you can feed your battery wood and fibre, both of which are fairly easy to come by. You can also build solar panels and other power-giving equipment to keep your van topped up.

There are multiple upgrade trees for your van, too. For example, you can increase the power of its motor so you can climb steeper inclines and increase building space.

Riding shotgun

(Image credit: Future)

Once you’ve got the gist of its central loop, Outbound doesn’t do much beyond it. There are some more interesting things to be found as you explore further afield, but they offer little in the way of interactivity. For all its splendor, the world is just a bit too empty.

I do like Outbound’s pacing, though. Like any good survival game, it holds back on giving you all the toys, requiring some effort to attain them all, which only makes it more rewarding once you do. It takes a while to get a dog, for instance, which is strange given that one features prominently in the game’s promotional material.

There are a few annoyances that spoil the fun slightly. There can be a lot of backtracking to signal towers as new blueprints appear, and while you can look at your map while driving, you can’t move around it or adjust the zoom. You’ll need to be a passenger or on foot to do those.

(Image credit: Future)

I can’t complain about the game’s performance, though. I didn’t encounter any visual bugs or drops in framerate. Online multiplayer was solid, too. Again, there was no lag or other glitches, save for a few instances of misaligned character placements. For example, there were times when I was in the back of the van while my partner drove, but on her screen, I was in the passenger seat.

The bigger issue with multiplayer is the absence of shared saves. This means that if you’re the guest in someone else’s game, you can’t carry on the adventure by yourself.

I’m hoping more content will be added in the future to expand the game’s potential, since there’s a good foundation here for more exploration and van-building opportunities to be added on top. For now, though, Outbound is a fun and good-natured way to while away a few hours, either alone or in good company.

Should you play Outbound?

(Image credit: Future)Play it if…

You want peaceful exploration
This is a no-stakes cozy game, where you can go at your own pace and follow your own path without risk.

You want to see a wholesome and positive representation of vanlife
With its beautiful environments and stress-free gameplay, you won’t find many depictions of the nomadic lifestyle as rosy as this.

Don’t play it if…

You want plenty of gameplay variation
The repetitive nature of collecting and crafting may start to grate after an hour or too.

You want a challenge
Outbound always goes easy on you, and lack of any real stakes can make those small victories feel a little hollow.

Accessibility

There aren’t many accessibility features in Outbound, although there are some I haven’t seen before. For instance, you can disable consumption sounds, which I presume is designed to aid people with misophonia.

You can also disable the mini games and disable the flashing effects from storms. The size of the UI is adjustable, too, although the range isn’t particularly wide. Thankfully, the maximum size should prove large enough for most gamers to see clearly.

You can toggle subtitles for the narration of player characters, but unfortunately there's no option for audio descriptions.

How I reviewed Outbound

(Image credit: Future)

I played Outbound for several hours, which is enough time to see most of what the game has to offer. There’s already a DLC (downloadable content) pack, entitled School Bus Adventures, but I’ve yet to play this.

Most of that time was spent playing cooperatively with my partner, although I also played it solo. We both played on PC: she used an Acer Nitro 14 gaming laptop, which features a AMD Ryzen 7 CPU, an Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 GPU, and 16GB of RAM, and I used a desktop with an AMD Ryzen 7, an RTX 5070, and 32GB of RAM. My partner played with the GameSir G7 Pro, which is one of the best PC controllers around, while I used the MSI Versa 300 Wireless 8K gaming mouse and the Corsair Vanguard Air 99 Wireless gaming keyboard.

I’ve been gaming for decades, and I’m a fan of titles with similar mechanics and pacing to Outbound, such as walking sims and adventure games. I’m also experienced in the survival and cozy genres, with Hozy and Subnautica 2 being two of my recent favorites.

First reviewed: May 2026

Honor 600: two-minute review

The Honor 600 is the brand’s latest mid-range phone, offering an iPhone-style design and a whole host of innovative AI features to Android users. Priced from £549.99, it’s a more affordable alternative to the flagship Honor 600 Pro, which was released around the same time for £899.99. But how does it hold up against other mid-range phones?

Let’s kick off with that AMOLED display. Coupled with its 2728 x 1264 resolution, this 6.57-inch screen delivers a pixel density of 458ppi, which means it can produce very crisp images. It’s also capable of ridiculously bright peak brightness, hitting up to 8,000 nits in certain limited circumstances. Colors are generally lush and vibrant, although on occasion, whites run a little blue for my liking.

In terms of design, I’d say the Honor 600 is attractive enough, though it doesn’t do enough to differentiate itself from many of the best phones out there. Honestly, it looks far too similar to the iPhone 17 Pro, even down to the full-width camera module and bright orange colorway. Fortunately, it redeems itself somewhat with its solid build quality and IP68 / IP69 rating, meaning you can count on it to shrug off dust and the occasional dunk in water.

Under the hood, the Honor 600 runs the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 CPU with 8GB of RAM. While that’s not a top-of-the-range chipset, it’s still very decent for a mid-range handset and offers pretty credible performance. During productivity tasks and everyday use, it always felt smooth and stable. Even when playing Call of Duty: Mobile with its HD packs installed, the Honor 600 was slicker than a frozen lake… although not quite as icy, given it warmed considerably over the course of three matches.

The Honor 600 also puts this performance to good use when it comes to software. MagicOS 10 is not only smooth and intuitive, but it also has great multitasking features, like the ability to multiscreen apps or share files with Honor devices, iPhones, and Macs. The only black mark here is the bloatware it ships with — despite allowing me to deselect some during installation, it still came teeming with unnecessary third-party apps like Temu, leaving a slightly sour taste in my mouth.

Another thing you can’t get away from when trying out the Honor’s software is AI. The Honor 600 is absolutely crammed with generative AI tools. Some of these are genuinely astounding — being able to reanimate still photos or create convincing-looking drone videos from nature photography is awesome. But there’s some inevitable jank here too, with some of the output I generated hallucinating extra cats (there’s relevant context here, I promise) or giving people shifting, changeling-esque faces that saw me nose-dive straight into the uncanny valley. If you’re into generative AI, though, you’ll likely be tempted by the sheer variety of tools on offer.

The camera system on the Honor 600 also makes no bones about its use of AI, although here the results are a lot more subtle. Its 200MP AI main lens can produce impressively crisp images, and all the macro shots I took showed a wonderful level of detail. Generally, colors appeared vibrant, although the Honor does slightly overemphasize blues in some shots. At longer focal distances, though, I found its cameras could sometimes lack a little in HDR pop, which is a real shame given its talents elsewhere.

Perhaps my favorite thing about the Honor 600 is a little more pedestrian: its battery. At 7,000mAh, it’s one of the largest-capacity batteries on any phone I’ve used — only narrowly beaten by the OnePlus 15R and OnePlus 15 — and during my testing, it lasted over 23 hours of constant video streaming. Just as remarkable, its 80W supercharging can fill it all the way up again to 100% in just over 50 minutes, meaning you shouldn’t ever have to be without your phone for long.

All in all, the Honor 600 is an impressive phone that punches above its £549.99 list price. Its screen is crisp and bright, its battery is ludicrously long-lived and, if you’re into AI features, it has a staggering range of presets and effects. Sure, its camera is a little inconsistent, it features too much bloatware, and it gets warm when you really test its CPU. But for a mid-range handset, its peaks are very high indeed, while its low points aren’t as abyssal as they could be.

(Image credit: Future)Honor 600 review: price and availability

• Launched May 7
• List price: £549.99 or £599.99

Launched on May 7, the Honor 600 is available now in the UK — but, as with other Honor devices, you won’t be able to get your hands on it in the US or Australia. It’s available for £549.99 with 256GB of storage or £599.99 if you’d prefer 512GB.

Storage size isn’t your only choice here, though: the Honor 600 comes in three different colorways. There's the Golden White version I tested here, plus Orange and Black. It’s worth noting, though, that Golden White is only available on the £599.99 model.

(Image credit: Future)Honor 600 review: specs

Dimensions

156 x 74.7 x 7.8 mm

Weight

185g (or 190g depending on variant)

Screen

6.57-inch AMOLED

Resolution

1264 x 2728

Refresh rate

120Hz

Chipset

Snapdragon 7 Gen 4

RAM

8GB / 12GB

Storage

128GB / 256GB / 512GB

OS

Android 16 (MagicOS 10)

Rear cameras

200MP wide (f/1.9), 12MP ultrawide (f/2.2)

Front camera

50MP (f/2.0)

Battery

7,000mAh

Charging

80W wired

(Image credit: Future)Honor 600 review: design

• Stylish albeit unremarkable design
• Solidly built
• IP68 rated

Starting with my first impressions, the Honor 600 is attractive enough, if a little anodyne. It’s not shattering norms like Nothing’s phones and its colorways will look eerily familiar to anyone who followed the launch of the iPhone 17 last September. But, on the whole, it looks sleek and inoffensive. The anodised metal trim and smooth glass back feel nice to the touch, and it has just enough weight to feel well-built without seeming unwieldy.

I feel less ambivalent about that full-width camera module if I’m honest, though. I get that it helps with stability, but I still find them pretty unsightly, and I’m not convinced the problem they’re intended to solve is a big enough issue to justify the amount of space they gobble up. Regardless, the Honor 600’s hunchback still looks less awkward than the one now shown off by the iPhone 17, so I’ll give Honor the W here.

In theory, the Honor 600 should also prove pretty sturdy, with the brand claiming it has obtained 5-star SGS Drop & Crush Resistance certification. While I’m not about to try verifying this by chucking it from the top of the Shard or running it over in an SUV, it does seem as robustly built as many phones I’ve tested. Literally the only marks it seemed to gather during my testing were a little scuffing of the metal around the camera lenses, and I’ll admit that was probably more down to me stashing two phones in the same pocket.

It’s not just good at resisting being squashed; the Honor 600 also has some of the best water and dust resistance of any phone I’ve ever used. Confusingly, it’s labeled IP68 and IP69… and IP69K – something that’s apparently to do with differences in international standards for how each rating is tested. At the very least, though, it should survive a dunking in more than 1m of water.

• Design score: 4 / 5

(Image credit: Future)Honor 600 review: display

• Very decent pixel density
• Blazing 8,000 nit peak brightness
• Colors vibrant but occasionally cooler than they should be

No matter how you look at it, the Honor 600’s screen is a serious achievement. At 6.57 inches, it might not be the largest screen on the market — getting absolutely dwarfed by behemoths like the 6.9-inch Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and iPhone 17 Pro Max — but it still outstrips many flagship screens in terms of scale.

Spreading its 2728 x 1264 pixel AMOLED display across those 6.57 inches gives the Honor 600 a 458ppi pixel density. That’s pretty impressive, falling just a little short of the iPhone 17 Pro’s 460ppi — although neither is anywhere near as impressive as the Samsung Galaxy S26 Plus’s meticulously detailed 513ppi. Trying out the screen on Planet Earth III, I could clearly see every wrinkle of the skin and every eyelash of an elephant matriarch and her calves in exquisite detail.

But where it really impresses is its brightness. I recently raved about how bright the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro was with its 5,000-nit peak, but honestly, the Honor 600 outshines it like a supernova, hitting an absurd peak of 8,000 nits.

OK, real life is never going to be as perfect as lab conditions. But I can certainly say my experiences with the phone revealed what a bright spark the Honor 600 can be. Comparing it side-by-side with my iPhone 16 Pro, the white levels were fantastic — while watching Planet Earth III, each of the fine white hairs on the cowl of a Cape fur seal pup practically glowed.

Colors on the Honor 600’s display are also impressively vibrant, with the beautiful blues and rich yellows of a golden-shouldered parrot looking exquisite and more expressive than my iPhone could manage. In some areas, the Honor loses a little accuracy, though, tending toward cooler hues that help those whites pop — for example, during a wildfire in the South African shrubland, the smoke looked overly blue while some of the reds felt a little lacking in range.

Thanks to its Sunlight Mode, the Honor 600 can maintain these impressively vivid pictures even when in direct sunlight. While that glass definitely shows visible reflections, they never overpower the bright peaks on the screen, although, naturally, they do swamp the darker areas. Despite this, I actually felt like my iPhone 16 Pro did a better job here, conveying more of a sense of color despite its duller screen.

Finally, the Honor 600’s display is capable of seriously fluid and responsive motion, even if it’s not literally the fastest on the market. Topping out at 120Hz, its display offers the same refresh rates as the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or iPhone 17 Pro, while falling short of the 144Hz offered by the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro or the ludicrous 165Hz offered by the OnePlus 15. Certainly, it felt very slick to me in day-to-day use and when navigating menus. Only serious gamers are likely to spot a difference between this and phones with higher rates.

• Display score: 4.5 / 5

(Image credit: Future)Honor 600 review: camerasFutureFutureFutureFutureFutureFuture

• Great detail, especially in macro shots
• HDR sometimes a little flat
• Unashamedly AI-enhanced

I'm not gonna lie: testing the Honor 600’s cameras has given me slight emotional whiplash. Because every time I’ve found something it doesn’t handle well, I discover another feature that blows me away. As a result, I want to acknowledge its shortcomings, while also emphasizing it’s still an impressive camera system in many ways.

First off, the level of detail it’s capable of is spectacular. Combining a 200MP AI main lens and a 12MP 112-degree ultra-wide lens, it takes some wonderfully crisp images – for example, showing the watchful eyes of two pigeons in sharp detail. I’ll admit, there’s a whole debate to be had about what level of AI enhancement can be laid over the top of photos before they stop being true photos, but I imagine more casual snappers won’t mind having this kind of helping hand in improving their shots.

This level of detail is most apparent when taking macro photos. I’ve been taking macro snaps on several generations of iPhone, and I’ve honestly never seen detail like this from my close-up photos. Shots of lilacs and the leaves of lupines after a heavy rain showed off exquisite details, like the beading of individual drops of water. And while I assume it gets a healthy assist here from its AI algorithm, the results were incredibly true to life, focusing purely on upscaling rather than applying artificial polish.

Color performance on the Honor 600’s camera is vibrant and, for the most part, faithful. For example, the rich pumpkin orange of lady’s purse flowers really jump off the screen. Like some other cameras I’ve used, though, the Honor 600 slightly overplays its hand when it comes to blues — rather than the subtle cornflower blue they should be, it rendered green alkanet flowers a bright azure. It’s not a complete deal-breaker, but if, like me, you value faithful hues over brilliant color, it’s something to bear in mind.

Unfortunately, its HDR images were a bit of a mixed bag. While close and medium-range shots conveyed a good balance of light and dark, I found some scenes with a much longer focal length looked a little washed out, especially on overcast days. And while that might not be an issue if you live in, say, LA, that’s a real issue given it’s on sale in the UK, where we see the sun about as often as we see the dentist.

FutureFutureFutureFuture

The Honor 600's zoom performance is a definite highlight, though. Taking a series of photos of a waterside building in Bath at different levels of magnification, I was impressed by how crisp the fine details of the balcony railings and stonework were, particularly at 4x zoom.

And the AI superzoom is impressive, even if it doesn’t remotely feel as clean as the output of an optical zoom. When shooting distant buildings and rooftops at 8x to 12x zoom, it straightened up wobbly lines and enhanced blurry textures well, though I’m not sure they’re shots I’d be sticking in my photo books.

FutureFutureFuture

Night photography is very decent, showing everything in crisp detail without a hint of grain. Snapping shots of the River Avon running through the center of Bristol, the Honor’s camera accurately conveyed the reflected light shimmering across its surface, while maintaining the deep blacks of the shadows. Unfortunately, it does seem to stumble into one of my personal pet peeves of slightly overbrightening night shots — it often left the sky looking far bluer than it did in reality, losing some of the magic of shooting at dusk.

All things considered, the Honor 600 camera system has some minor shortcomings but also some things I’ll genuinely miss when going back to my flagship phone. And while I’m not totally comfortable claiming the creative polish of AI as my own, I’m sure a lot of people just want shots of their loved ones and their adventures to look their best, which the camera here can absolutely help with.

• Cameras score: 4 / 5

(Image credit: Future)Honor 600 review: software

• AI features seriously powerful
• Decent productivity tools
• Way too much bloatware

The Honor 600 uses MagicOS 10, which is built upon Android 16. When setting up the phone, I was initially pleased with how the OS seemed to let me deselect all the bloat Honor wanted to install… until I actually booted the phone up.

At this point, I found it was still absolutely crammed with third-party apps. There’s a reason I don’t want apps like TikTok and Temu on my phone, and it’s quite irritating that Honor acts like it’s giving you a choice while actively making that choice for you when it comes to some of the worst offenders.

That’s a real shame because, outside of this, MagicOS 10 offers a relatively smooth user experience. Accessing the App Tray, Control Center, notifications, and wallpaper & style settings are all perfectly intuitive. While it’s not quite as versatile as something like NothingOS — with added features like scalable app icons — I generally found it easy to use, even as a diehard iOS user.

It’s hard to discuss software on the Honor 600 without talking about AI. A lot of the hype around this handset has been based around how absolutely crammed with creative AI features it is. And they’re often impressive, periodically janky — and occasionally just a touch unsettling.

One of the first features I used was the Honor 600’s Image to Video function. When looking at a photo in your gallery, all you have to do is hold the AI button, and up pops a dialogue allowing you to convert the image to a short-form video.

Like anyone who grew up perennially online, my immediate instinct was to create cat videos. So I selected a couple of shots of Muffin, my own little bundle of joy sociopathy, licking his paw, and clicked Generate. The results were seriously impressive — not only did the licking look realistic, but it even maintained details like the irregular white patch on his nose.

Occasionally, the results were a little wobbly. When I uploaded a snap of my cat looking worried after he’d clambered too high up the curtains, the generative AI did a good job of animating his movements but got his proportions really wrong. No way is my boi as chonky as the AI made him look.

But the Honor 600’s AI features extend far beyond just adding movement to still photos. You can also add prompts, although these can be far more prone to hallucinations. Using a shot of my cat sitting on the sofa and one of him standing on his hind legs by my French doors, I typed in a prompt asking the AI to make him get up and then start dancing. Weirdly, it made the choice to have Muffin flee the scene and be simultaneously replaced by a dancing doppelkitteh — although, to be fair, his moves were pretty on point.

For those who don’t want to do a whole bunch of prompt wrangling to bring their photos to life, the Honor 600 comes with a bunch of preset effects you can apply instead. Some of these produced truly amazing results. Using the Magic Motion feature on a macro photo of a bee I took nestled among some rhododendrons, the bee convincingly sprang to life and crawled through the blooms. When I used the Drone Pullback effect on a close-up photo I took of a thistle by a Scottish loch, it was utterly convincing in the way it zoomed out, perfectly maintaining the look of the water and mountains in the background.

Other features made me feel slightly queasy, though. One preset generated a video of my partner and me embracing that looked just different enough to us to give me the uncanny feeling that I was watching a stranger wear my skin like an ill-fitting suit. Another video that showed my girlfriend busting moves like a breakdancer struggled to accurately capture her face, making it morph between ersatz Selena Gomez and nigh-on Winona Ryder — watching AI do this to a face you wake up to every day definitely gives you slight body-horror vibes.

There are some strong productivity features. Single tap sharing is available between the Honor 600 and other Honor devices, as well as the iPhone — although if you’re sending from the iPhone, you’ll need to use the Honor Connect app. You can also connect and seamlessly share with Honor and MacOS laptops and desktops, something I couldn’t actually get to work on either of my MacBooks.

On top of this, the Honor 600 offers a lot of AI productivity features. Not only do you have access to Gemini, but you can also share your camera or screen in Gemini Live conversations so you can discuss things you’re looking at.

It also offers some AI security features, such as AI Deepfake Detection and AI Voice Cloning Detection. Short of building my own deepfake bot, I didn’t have much opportunity to test these last couple of features, but assuming they work, I can absolutely see how they’d be useful tools to have.

Fundamentally, this is a phone that goes all in on its AI software. How appealing or off-putting you find that will likely depend on your overall attitude to Generative AI, but either way, it’s hard to deny that the tools it offers are seriously powerful.

• Software score: 4 / 5

(Image credit: Future)Honor 600 review: performance

• Decent mid-range chipset
• Smooth performance for productivity and gaming
• Gets quite warm under heavy loads

Under the hood, the Honor 600 runs the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4, which is a very decent chipset for a mid-market phone. While it’s hardly the bleeding edge of the manufacturer’s chips, it’s the same chip used by the impressive Nothing Phone (4a) Pro and considerably more powerful than the Exynos 1680 packaged with the recent Samsung A57.

In practice, I generally found this combo of the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 and my testing handset’s 8GB of RAM gamely shouldered pretty much everything I threw at it. Whether I opened multiple games, loaded up myriad tabs in Chrome, or tapped away in Google Docs all while streaming videos in the background, I didn’t notice any real slowdown or stuttering, suggesting you’ll be fine carrying out most productivity tasks on this handset.

And its gaming performance was equally impressive, even if it wasn’t quite top tier. When I tried to set Genshin Impact to the Highest graphics setting, the game warned me that would overclock the CPU. But just one tier down, at High, it was incredibly stable, even when I was soaring through the sky or surrounded on all sides by enemies.

Next, I fired up Call of Duty: Mobile. Even with all of the HD graphics packs installed, it ran smoother than a waxed eel, not betraying any hint of judder or frame rate drops. Even wheeling round in the midst of battle, I could react fast enough to gun down groups of three or four opponents before they even had me in their sights.

But while its mid-range chipset seems to respond with impressive speed, it sure loses its cool easily. After three matches of multiplayer, it was warm enough that my sweaty mitts were slightly losing their grip. It wasn’t so hot that I was worried about the phone being damaged, but it does make me question whether you can game for hours at a time on this handset.

• Performance score: 4 / 5

(Image credit: Future)Honor 600 review: battery life

• Huge 7,000mAh battery
• Lasted 23 hours of constant use
• Incredible 80W supercharging

Given that the Honor 600 banks so heavily on its super-bright screen and AI features, it would be a bit of a disaster if it had a meager battery capacity.

Fortunately, the opposite is true. Honor’s kitted out the 600 with a truly absurd 7,000mAh battery. That’s significantly higher than most flagships, and I think it's only beaten by the OnePlus 15R and OnePlus 15, with their 7,400mAh and 7,300mAh respective capacities.

What does that mean in practice? Well, I set the phone streaming a 2K video from YouTube on a loop and timed how long it took for the battery to drain from full to empty. It finally conked out at just over 23 hours, which is one of the longest results I’ve ever seen. So you should definitely expect well over a full day of normal use.

And even when the Honor 600 does run out, its 80W supercharging tops it u unbelievably fast. When I hooked it up to a power brick rated for 100W, the Honor’s battery seemed thirstier than a middle-aged tech bro cranking out TikTok memes, drinking down enough juice that it went from flat to fully charged in just over 50 minutes. That’s honestly wild with a battery this large.

All in all, the Honor 600’s battery and charging put most phones to shame. It keeps going and going, and even when it finally falters, it needs to be plugged in for less than an hour to get it on its feet again. That’s truly fantastic.

• Battery life score: 5 / 5

(Image credit: Future)Should I buy the Honor 600?

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Design

Sleek design that perhaps plays it too safe; chunky full-width camera module; robustly built with IP68 rating.

4/5

Display

Wonderfully detailed 459ppi resolution; blazing 8,000 nit peak brightness; great color reproduction even if it is a shade cooler than some displays.

4.5/5

Software

Massive variety of generative AI functionality, some of which are fantastic while others can be a little janky, great productivity tools; comes with too much bloatware installed.

4/5

Cameras

Wonderfully crisp detail, especially for macro shots, vibrant color; powerful night photography that brightens scenes a little too much; mixed HDR performance. Built-in AI functionality might not be for everyone.

4/5

Performance

Solid mid-range chipset and 8GB RAM, strong performance during productivity tasks and demanding games; heats up quite quickly during heavy loads.

4/5

Battery life

Stupendous 7,000mAh battery capacity that lasts 23 hours continuous use; 80W supercharging fills entire battery in just 50 minutes.

5/5

Buy it if…

You want superb battery life
Lasting over 23 hours during our battery test, the Honor 600 has one of the most capacious batteries I’ve ever tested in a phone. And its superfast charging means you can juice it up completely in less than an hour.

You love AI tools
The Honor 600 is positively crammed with AI features. If you’ve always wanted to watch your dog body popping or see yourself hug Henry VIII, then you’ll have a blast here.

Don’t buy it if…

You hate AI tools
Given how much the Honor 600 embraces AI, you’ll find it very hard to ignore, as it’s baked into many functions of the phone. Disabling it is possible in most circumstances. But really, why buy an unashamedly AI-focused phone if you don’t want those features?

You’re a serious mobile gamer
The Honor 600 offers very solid gaming performance, but it does get warm relatively quickly. Dedicated gaming phones like the RedMagic 11 Pro offer even more punchy performance.

Honor 600 review: also consider

Category

Honor 600

Nothing Phone (4a) Pro

Google Pixel 10a

Dimensions

156 x 74.7 x 7.8 mm

163.7 x 76.6 x 8 mm

153.9 x 73 x 9 mm

Weight

185g

210g

183g

Screen

6.57-inch AMOLED

6.83-inch AMOLED

6.3-inch Actua pOLED

Resolution

1264 x 2728

2800 x 1260

1080 x 2424

Refresh rate

120Hz

144Hz

60-120Hz

Chipset

Snapdragon 7 Gen 4

Snapdragon 7 Gen 4

Google Tensor G4

RAM

8GB / 12GB

8GB / 12GB

8GB

Storage

128GB / 256GB / 512GB

128GB / 256GB

128GB / 256GB

OS

Android 16 (MagicOS 10)

Android 16 (Nothing OS 4.1)

Android 16

Rear cameras

200MP wide, 12MP ultrawide

50MP wide, 8MP ultrawide, 50MP periscope

48MP wide, 13MP ultrawide

Front camera

50MP

32MP

13MP

Battery

7,000mAh

5,080mAh

5,100mAh

Charging

80W wired

50W wired

45W wired, wireless Qi

Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
While the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro offers slightly less storage at 256GB and has a weaker camera than the Honor 600, it has a whole heap of strengths too. It’s super cool, both in terms of its iconoclastic design and its excellent VC cooling system, which keeps it from heating up even when playing high-end games. It’s also just packed with fun features like its rear glyph matrix display, which offers loads of new ways to interact with your phone.

Read my full Nothing Phone (4a) Pro review

Google Pixel 10a
Coming in just a tiny bit cheaper than the Honor 600, the Google Pixel 10a should be your choice if you still want a phone crammed with AI features but can’t get your hands on the Honor 600. It offers Google’s streamlined take on Android, a flush camera module — no huge lump here — a decent 5,100mAh battery capacity, and seven years of software and security updates.

Read our full Google Pixel 10a review

(Image credit: Future)How I tested the Honor 600

• Tested phone for two weeks
• Assessed a wide range of features
• Six years of handling phone reviews

I tested the Honor 600 over several weeks. To put the display through its paces, I played multiple HDR videos and compared the color and brightness side-by-side with my iPhone 16 Pro. Trying out the camera modules, I made sure to take a range of pictures of people, places, and plant life at a range of zooms and distances.

When testing the Honor 600’s software and performance, I tried it out on a range of productivity tasks, played multiple demanding games and used as many of the AI features as possible. Finally, to assess how well the battery performed, I streamed a 2K video on a loop until the battery ran out and then charged it up using a charger rated for at least 80W to see how long it would take to hit 100% again.

In terms of my personal experience, not only have I been writing about gadgets and tech for over 10 years, but I’ve also been overseeing phone reviews for multiple titles for the past six.

• Read TechRadar’s reviews guarantee
• First reviewed: May 2026

IMOU AOV PT: two-minute review

Founded in 2015 as a spin-off from the Chinese surveillance giant Dahua Technology, Hangzhou-based IMOU has quickly become a major player in the value segment of the smart home market. A few months ago, I looked at the IMOU Cell 3C, another budget outdoor security camera. I liked the model, but it was a lot more basic than this model (and much cheaper, too).

For starters, the AOV PT features a separate, rather than the integrated solar panel found on the Cell 3C. For many set-ups this is an important distinction because often the best place for a camera, such as under an eve or in a porch, is the worst place for a solar panel. Having a separate panel means it can be located up to four metres away in a sun-drenched spot using the long USB-C cable provided.

The IMOU AOV PT features 'smart tracking' to follow subjects (Image credit: Future)

Whereas most battery cameras stay in a deep sleep until a PIR is triggered, this latest IMOU features the company’s Always-On Video (AOV) technology — hence the AOV moniker. It’s like a sort of low-power mode where the camera records a frame every two seconds continuously, creating a low-frame rate timelapse of the entire day. Then, when the AI detects a human or vehicle, it ramps up to full-speed 3K (5MP) recording. Particularly clever is the smart tracking option which means once the pan-and-tilt camera detects movement it will follow the ‘target’ as it moves around. It’s all a bit Big Brother-y maybe, but useful if you want to track certain individuals or vehicles.

Usually, where security cameras manufacturers make their money is in selling you a monthly subscription to store your video footage in the cloud. Not only is this a potential cybersecurity risk, it can also get very expensive (I’m looking at you Ring). Even the average price of a subscription is £5 (about $7 / AU$10) a month, which I think is a bit excessive for basically storing your video clips.

With the IMOU AOV PT not only is a MicroSD card slot provided for storage, but IMOU has even thrown in a 32GB MicroSD card gratis — it’s a really nice touch, especially if you're always scrabbling around for a card to record onto! If you want more storage, though, the device can support up to 512GB. Alternatively, it is possible to sign-up to one of IMOU’s subscription plans (see details below).

The camera has a slot for a MicroSD card, but this can only be accessed with a screwdriver (Image credit: Future)

Usefully, in addition to a MicroSD card, the IMOU also comes with a 4G SIM. This enables you to control the camera via the IMOU Life app without it having to be hooked up to the home’s Wi-Fi. IMOU provides a modest 100Mb of data (with a trial offer for a 6GB plan). However, for those monitoring properties where Wi-Fi connectivity is either non-existent, or at best patchy, it’s a potential game changer.

On the downside, though, the camera only supports the 2.4GHz Wi-Fi frequency rather than the higher 5GHz Wi-Fi frequency which is better for faster data transfer.

The camera features IMOU's Always-On Video (AOV) technology (Image credit: Future)

Designed to be mounted permanently outdoors, the IMOU boasts an IP-66 weatherproof rating for heavy-duty waterproof protection. It also comes with two reasonably powerful spotlights, a built-in microphone and speaker for two-way communication and a siren for warding off intruders (though this isn’t the loudest). There’s also a clever smart night vision feature so that when the camera detects an object, the spotlight is automatically activated, and recordings are displayed in color.

IMOU AOV PT: subscription options

Basic Plan: Covers seven days of event history and basic AI detection, between £2.59-£3.50 ($4-$5 / AU$5-AU$7) per month or approximately £30 ($40 / AU$70) a year.

Plus Plan: Offers 30 days of event history, enhanced AI detection, and sharing with up to 20 users. Costs around £5.99 ($9 / AU$12) per month or £60 ($80 / AU$110) per year.

See https://www.imou.com/uk/imou-protect for more details

IMOU AOV PT: price and availability

How much does it cost? IMOU AOV PT, $170 / £129 / AU$260

When is it available? Since December 2025

Where is it available? UK / US / Australia

Chinese firm IMOU is known for its competitively priced home security products. This one is no exception. OK, it’s quite a bit more expensive than the IMOU Cell 3C we reviewed which also comes with a solar panel. But then the AOV PT offers so much more and is still under £150.

In fact, when you consider the package includes a separate 5W solar panel, a pre-installed 32GB MicroSD card, and a 4G SIM card, the IMOU AOV PT is actually really very good value for money. That’s not to mention other useful features such as 360-degree field of view thanks to the pan-and-tilt camera and smart tracking so you can monitor the movements of intruders!

Compared to 4G rivals from Arlo or Reolink, which often require separate purchases for solar panels or storage, the IMOU really is a cost-effective, all-in-one solution for those needing off-grid security. Best of all is that you don’t need to pay for a monthly subscription — although that option is available from around £3 a month if you want it. Instead, you can store video clips on the MicroSD card provided or upgrade to one holding 512GB (these are now widely available for under £50/$50).

• Value score: 5/5

IMOU AOV PT: design

• Pan-and-tilt design
• Separate solar panel
• IP66 waterproofing

It’s fair to say that the IMOU AOV PT won’t win any security camera beauty competitions. Built for utility rather than stealth, it comprises a not particularly attractive black pan-and-tilt camera inside a large white plastic housing, plus a separate lightweight solar panel designed to tilt up to 45 degrees for maximum solar gain.

Installation isn’t the easiest either. Because of its weight and the way it protrudes from the wall, it requires a very secure mount. It’s not a camera you can casually stick up with a couple of small screws. Instead, you’ll need the full four-screw bracket provided (plus wall plugs if drilling into brick) to prevent it from vibrating in the wind or feeling flimsy.

This camera is quite chunky, and takes more than just a couple of screws to mount (Image credit: Future)

For added protection/security the camera snaps firmly into the mount and can only be released by pressing a button underneath the unit. Here you will also find a rubber flap covering the power on and the USB-C input for connecting to the solar panel and for recharging the camera (it comes with an integrated 1000mAh lithium-ion battery).

For our set-up we installed the camera on a wooden summer house/home office with the solar panel located nearby and angled towards the sun (the app tells you when it is receiving power from the panel). However, 4m of cable is provided if you need to locate the solar panel a bit further away to capture the sun’s rays. Thankfully, the solar panel is much simpler to install than the camera but the two units together do take up quite a lot of space, compared to other designs.

The camera snaps firmly into its mount (Image credit: Future)

Finally, one slightly odd aspect of the design is the panel for the MicroSD card and 4G SIM card slots. Located at the back of the camera lens, this can only be accessed with a Phillips screwdriver. Perhaps it’s to deter casual thieves from easily stealing the MicroSD/SIM cards, or maybe to provide further protection from the elements?

• Design score: 4/5

IMOU AOV PT: performance

• 360-degree field of view
• 3K resolution
• Color night vision

When it comes to performance, the IMOU AV PT is one of the best I’ve reviewed — especially at this price level. When it comes to functionality, it’s difficult to imagine any other cameras matching it. However, what’s impressive is that it combines this functionality with very good performance too. For example, the 3K image quality is crisp enough to identify faces at a distance, and the full-color night vision is excellent, using two bright spotlights to illuminate intruders.

What I particularly like is the pan-and-tilt camera which effectively gives the camera a full 360-degree view, much wider than most cameras which are limited to a maximum of around 150 degrees. Either you can move it around using the left/right, up/down keys on the app or you can use the ‘smart tracking’ option in the menus so that it tracks movement automatically.

In-app controls make it easy to pan and tilt the camera (Image credit: Future)

During testing it was great fun, picking up neighbours on balconies, even family members walking close to the patio doors inside the kitchen. However, I could see it would have a serious function too if ever I was burgled, capturing the culprit as they approached the house and closing in on their physical details.

Any criticisms? Well, a few, but they are minor. Firstly, it is worth bearing in mind that the ‘smart tracking’ option really does drain the 10,000mAh battery. During a day of heavy testing, it dropped 11% in just 24 hours, even with some additional solar power from the panel. For long term use it’s probably best to switch it off completely or limit the use of the camera to certain hours of the day.

Full-color night vision is impressiveFutureThe camera is actually fun to useFutureUsing 4G means you need to be aware of your data allowanceFuture

Using the app, recording times can be set for each day (so the camera only records footage at night) or you can quickly put it into ‘privacy mode’ where the lens turns around completely so you can’t record. It’s also possible to set areas where you don’t want to record, such as a neighbor’s garden or a busy main road using the ‘activity zone’ option.

As with many security cameras, one small bugbear is that the IMOU AV PT is a little too sensitive, creating a few false alarms. Not only can this get a little bit annoying after a while (getting an alert every time a bird flies past), it can further drain the battery. Finally, while the siren works effectively enough, it’s certainly not the loudest we’ve ever heard.

• Performance score: 4.5/5

Should you buy the IMOU AOV PT?IMOU AOV PT score card

Attribute

Notes

Score

Value

Costing around $170 / £129 / AU$260, the IMOU really is excellent value for money especially considering that it comes with a solar panel, a 4G SIM and a MicroSD card.

5/5

Design

Built for the outdoors with IP66 weatherproof rating, the IMOU focuses on rugged practicality rather than stunning good looks. It’s quite bulky too.

4/5

Performance

The IMOU AOV PT combines great functionality with high quality 3K images. We particularly like the smart tracking option though it does wear the battery down.

4.5/5

Overall

Want to protect a property but Wi-Fi is dodgy or non-existent? This outdoor security camera is the perfect solution, combining great performance with 4G connectivity and MicroSD storage.

4.5/5

Buy it if

You are in a rural location

If you don’t have Wi-Fi and access to power is limited, this is probably the best security camera around for keeping an eye on your property or business.

You want total coverage

The 360-degree pan and tilt lens ensures there aren’t any blind spots. Smart tracking means the lens will follow any movement — whether it’s human or a vehicle.

Don't buy it if

You want a discreet solution

The IMOU AOV PT is quite a bulky and slightly tricky to install proposition, comprising a large camera and separate solar panel.

You want a loud siren

The siren on the IMOU AOV PT is one of the quietest I’ve heard.

IMOU AOV PT: also consider

If you're not sure whether the IMOU AOV PT is the right camera for you, here's how it stacks up against two of its rivals.

IMOU AOV PT

Reolink Solar Floodlight Cam

IMOU Cell 3C

Subscription price

None. Optional subscription from £3 (about $5 / AU$6) a month

None. Optional subscription from £2.71 (about $4 / AU$6) a month.

None required. Optional IMOU Protect from from £3 (about $5 / AU$6) a month

Viewing angle

360-degree pan and tilt lens

150-degree ultra-wide diagonal

120-degree horizontal

Network connection

Wi-Fi (2.4GHz)/4G

Wi-Fi (2.4GHz/5GHz)

Wi-Fi (2.4GHz)

Audio

Two-way audio

Two-way audio

Two-way audio

Video

3K (5MP) video resolution

2K (1440p) video resolution

2K (3MP) video resolution

Power

Battery/Solar

Battery/Solar

Battery/Solar

Hardware price

$170 / £129 / AU$260

$99/ £85 / AU$169 (with built in solar panel)

$55 / £49 / AU$129 (with built in solar panel)

Reolink Solar Floodlight Cam

Looking for a decent security camera with powerful spotlights that you don’t have to keep recharging every few months? Then the Reolink Solar Floodlight Cam is a good option, especially given its competitive price tag.

Read our full Reolink Solar Floodlight Cam review

IMOU Cell 3C

A pretty decent outdoor security camera with an integrated solar panel. What it lacks in image quality, the IMOU more than makes up for in functionality and the price is extremely competitive.

Read our full IMOU Cell 3C review

How I tested the IMOU AOV PT

• I used the camera outdoors for seven days
• I set it up myself using the fittings provided by the manufacturer
• The security camera and solar panel was installed on the outside of my summer house/office

I am forever climbing up and down step ladders changing over outdoor security cameras on my summer house, so much so that the neighbours must think I’m paranoid about getting burgled. This is the latest in a long line of solar panel cameras I’ve looked at recently and I think one of the best so far.

I really enjoyed the smart tracking feature, watching the camera following the movement of family members and my dog Poppy, as well as the occasional glimpse of neighbours standing on a balcony. If I had the device for a long time I would probably switch this off as it is a major drain on the battery as well as being overly intrusive (although less so than using the pan-and-tilt camera in the house).

I can also see the benefits of the 4G SIM. While my Wi-Fi is generally OK in the garden, thanks to a Wi-Fi repeater near the back door, there are many homes especially in rural areas where this option could be a game-changer.

First reviewed May 2026

Shark PowerDetect Speed: one-minute review

The Shark PowerDetect Speed is a very capable cordless stick vacuum with a great auto empty base, but like other high-powered cordless vacuums a lack of battery life means it can’t replace a main vacuum.

It did a great job picking up fine dust and larger debris in our tests on carpet and hard floors, has good edge cleaning, and can easily be moved around the house making it an ideal occasional cleaner.

(Image credit: Future)

It's a premium product from an established vacuum brand, but when compared with Dyson it's significantly more affordable, making it a good choice if you want top, reliable performance without the high price.

Battery life is a major concern though, as it didn’t last 11 minutes on the highest power setting and took over five hours to recharge the battery, limiting its practicality.

Shark PowerDetect Speed: price and availability

The PowerDetect Speed launched in the US and UK in April 2026 costing US$499.99 and £499.99 for the Clean & Empty version that comes with an auto empty charging dock (although it is worth noting the US version comes with an extra Pet Multi tool that the UK version doesn’t). At the time of writing, it's not available in Australia.

This places at the premium end of the scale for vacuums, although it is significantly cheaper than the Dyson Gen5 Detect models it is competing with making it feel very good value for money when comparing spec with spec.

The build quality is good, it feels capable of handling the rough and tumble of everyday cleaning and it has a good set of features you would expect of a top of the line vacuum including floor and dirt detection. The addition of a dock that empties and charges the vacuum is a godsend and real standout at this price point.

The PowerDetect Speed is also available without the auto empty dock for $429.99 or £429.99, which come with an extra upholstery tool in the US or pet tool in the UK.

• Value score: 4/5

Shark PowerDetect Speed: specs

Weight (body only)

1.6kg

Weight (with wand and main floorhead)

3.2kg

Bin size

16oz / 470ml

Dock bin size

2.1 quarts / 2 liters

Runtime in Min mode

54m 5s

Runtime in Max mode

10m 38s

Charge time

5h 19m

Size: body, wand & floorhead (unfolded)

43 x 10 x 16 inches / 110 x 26 x 41cm

Size: body, wand & floorhead (folded)

26 10 x 12 inches / 67 x 26 x 31cm

Size: body, wand & floorhead in dock

41 x 10 x 16 inches / 105 x 26 x 40cm

Size: body only

10 x 3 x 14 inches / 26cm x 8.5cm x 36cm

Max suction

150AW

Modes

Eco, Max, Variable

Shark PowerDetect Speed: design

• Simple, functional design
• Place to store accessories
• Dirt detect feature not shown on the floorhead

While a vacuum cleaner is very much a practical product rather than a statement piece it is nice for it to look at least smart in a subtle way if you do have to have it visible and Shark has done a decent job with the PowerDetect Speed. The grey and blue metallic finish feels mostly focused on blending into the background and any out-there accents have thankfully been limited to the orange roller in the floorhead.

The auto empty dock is also unfussy but does include one of my favorite features of this entire product in the shape of two small notches at the back of the dock for storing the included accessories. This is such a small thing, but after years of trying to find where in the house the kids have hidden the crevice tool this time, it is hugely appreciated.

FutureFutureFuture

The body of the vacuum is similar to the older PowerDetect model but it is slightly smaller, lighter and they have swapped the trigger button for a second button on the back of body. This is a definite improvement as it was easy to accidentally change modes with the trigger button, especially if vacuuming at different heights such as cleaning the stairs.

The PowerDetect Speed does lose 0.5kg on the previous version and comes in under Dyson’s Gen5 Detect by around 300g, but that said, this is still a bit of a chunky vacuum cleaner and may feel like a bit of a workout to push around for some, Rivals like the Dreame R20 weigh in almost a whole kilo lighter so if lightweight is top of your priority list it may be worth looking elsewhere.

FutureFutureFuture

It's controlled using two buttons on the back of the body, which also has a screen to show you what mode you are in, how much battery you have left and whether the vacuum is currently detecting dirt where you are cleaning. This is done through a color coded arc around the top of the screen with a dark purple color indicating it is picking up a lot of dirt which then progressively goes paler until it goes white indicating the floor is now clean.

I will go into more detail about the PowerDetect feature later but I do have a gripe about how this is presented. In the previous PowerDetect model this color-coding was also shown in lights at the back of the floorhead so you could see cleaning performance as you cleaned without taking your eyes off where you were moving the floorhead. With it only on the back of the body of the vacuum you now have to keep moving your eyes from one to the other which is definitely a step backwards.

FutureFutureFuture

The floorhead uses one roller with anti-wrap elements and a light that switches from regular white light on carpet to a blue UV light on hard floors for highlighting dirt. This works well although I’m not sure the UV light really provides a significant improvement over a regular light.

Depending where you are you will get different accessories with US customers getting a crevice tool and pet multi tool and those in the UK only getting a crevice tool, but the slightly better version that includes a sliding duster to it. The pet multi tool did OK at picking up cat hair, although no better than the regular floorhead and generally just caught them in the bristles rather than picking them up directly. Where it was most useful was as a wider cleaning path than the crevice tool when vacuuming a car.

• Design score: 4/5

Shark PowerDetect Speed: performance

• Dirt Detect works well
• Excellent fine detail and debris pick up
• Handles pet and long hair well without tangling

It is straightforward to use with only the two buttons for one and off or to change mode — which unless you are trying to maximize battery runtime, you shouldn’t need. The attachments are easy to snap into place or detach using the large buttons and the whole vacuum can fold in half for storage away from the charging dock.

It maneuvers well and while it might not be quite as smooth as the Dyson equivalent or as light as some other rivals it is easy to steer around furniture. It also is able to bend the wand so you can run the cleaner under low furniture reaching hard to clean spots. This is a nice bonus and may be ideal for some homes but I personally didn’t find myself using it day to day.

I used coffee grounds to test the vacuum's edge cleaning on carpetFutureAfter one pass on low power mode, only a little remainedFutureA second pass on high power removed the remainderFuture

Emptying the vacuum is one area where it really stands out, you simply pop it back on top of the charging dock when you are done — or more likely when it has run out of battery but more on that later — and the base sucks all the dust out into its own larger two-liter bin. This obviously will need emptying itself, but the shape (and the fact you will have to do it less often) makes it much easier to do this without making a mess.

The detect part of PowerDetect comes from the four ways it adjusts suction power to optimize cleaning by detecting the floor type, amount of dirt being sucked up, whether it is close to the edge of a room and what direction it is traveling. This means all you need to do is move the vacuum around and it will change its cleaning modes, with the dirt detection also letting you know whether certain sections are worth some more attention through the color coding display on the handle.

Rice and coffee grounds are two of our usual picks for testing vacuums on carpetFutureOne pass on low power removed all the rice and most of the coffee, though some debris was leftFutureA second pass on high power, and everything was goneFuture

When I first used this dirt detection I was a bit skeptical that it was still picking up debris where it claimed it was but the dust bin would time and again prove me wrong. At first this felt like an amazing feature, but later when combined with the battery life, having to go back and forth over the same bits of floor made me start to wonder if ignorance was bliss.

In the cleaning tests the Speed struggled a bit in low suction mode with one pass leaving quite a bit of fine dust and larger debris on both carpet and hard floors. Moving it up to full suction did much better with it picking up almost all the fine dust on the hard floor and, aside from some scattering of the rice, most of the debris on the next pass.

I also tested the vacuum with rice and coffee on a hard floorFutureThe vacuum struggled somewhat on low powerFutureHigh power was much more effective, with only a few stray coffee grounds leftFuture

Edge cleaning was a similar story at both low and high power, with it doing very well on high for hard floors. It still needed the crevice tool to get the finest material but it did as well as I have seen from a stick vacuum.

Hair pickup was also excellent handling long and pet hair well without any sign of tangling on the floorhead brush.

It’s not quiet but at around 70-75 dbs (somewhere between traffic and a busy restaurant) on maximum power it's not the loudest either. The auto empty base creates a similar level of noise as it flushes the dust from the cleaner, but this is a pretty quick process.

• Performance score: 4.5/5

Shark PowerDetect Speed: battery life

• Less than 11 minutes on boost mode
• Long recharge time
• Spare batteries not yet available

My sticking point with the PowerDetect Speed is the battery life as, when testing on full power, it only managed a paltry 10 minutes and 38 seconds. While the variable speed in dirt detect mode will allow you to get a bit more cleaning out of a charge, I often found it would last less than half an hour. Couple this with a recharge time of 5 hours and 19 minutes and it severely limits its practicality as a main vacuum for anything but a small apartment.

This is a common problem for high powered stick vacuums as they try to keep the weight of the batteries down, but it is one of the shortest run times and longest charge times I have tested making it a bit of a challenge even thoroughly vacuuming the car on a single charge.

While you can switch out the battery, I wasn’t able to find a way of buying a spare battery online with the cordless vacuum battery available through Shark’s website only compatible with older models. If one is made available expect this to come with a hefty price tag, the older model batteries cost an additional $87.99.

• Battery life score: 3/5

Should you buy the Shark Poweretect Speed?

The answer is going to depend heavily on the size of your home and how you plan to use the cleaner. If this is going to be your only vacuum it’s barely going to get through a studio apartment before it needs a recharge. If you are looking for a convenient cleaner for spot cleaning it is superb both in terms of performance and ease of emptying, all while being a step cheaper than the Dyson equivalent.

Shark PowerDetect Speed: score card

Attribute

Notes

Score

Value

It’s not cheap but feature for feature it stacks up against some of the most expensive available and delivers top performance.

4/5

Design

Well built and unfussy, it definitely leans more towards substance than style but that’s exactly what I look for in a vacuum.

4/5

Performance

Tackling fine dust and large debris equally well on hard floors and carpet, plus pretty good edge cleaning make it a top performer.

4.5/5

Battery life

Only tasting 10 and a half minutes on the highest setting and a long charge time hold it back from being a practical main vacuum.

3/5

Buy it if

Size matters

You want a portable vacuum for quick cleans when you don’t want to get out a big wired cleaner

You're on a budget

You want a Dyson but can’t bring yourself to pay those prices.

You want to keep things tidy

You hate the mess of emptying cordless vacuum cleaners, but love their light weight and convenience.

Don't buy it if

You want to clean a house in one go

You need a main vacuum cleaner that can power through big cleans and tackle multiple rooms in a single session.

You struggle with heavy vacuums

This is one of the weightier vacuums we've tested.

How I tested the Shark PowerDetect Speed

I tested the PowerDetect Speed for over a week in day-to-day use as well as specific tests picking up fine dust (tea) and larger debris (rice) on hard floors, carpet and around room edges. Battery life was tested on the highest power setting and lowest, as well as checking the time it took to fully charge from empty.

I tested the Speed in different cleaning scenarios including vacuuming stairs, a car and a variety of floor types.

First reviewed May 2026

reMarkable Paper Pure: Two-minute review

reMarkable’s new Paper Pure is the company’s cheapest and most accessible black-and-white handwriting tablet. Comparisons to the now-discontinued reMarkable 2 are inevitable. The Paper Pure is the reMarkable 3 — or perhaps the reMarkable 2.5 — in all but name.

Now, I absolutely adore my five-year-old reMarkable 2. I use it pretty much daily for work and play. So, I was a little dubious about this thrusting young upstart muscling in. A budget reMarkable with no frontlight, the same old 226ppi, and a plastic shell? In 2026? That’s something absolutely nobody was asking for. Unboxing the tablet, I prepared myself for disappointment.

Happily, I was wrong. The Paper Pure is a surprisingly good device, delivering a faultless writing and sketching experience that’s as close to using a pad and pen as you can get at this price point.

All reMarkable devices focus on stripping out any and all distractions. So, like its predecessors, the Paper Pure has no notifications, no apps, and no ads. Even the AI is restricted to converting handwriting into text. At a time when every other device you own is desperately trying to sway your attention, this is pure, beautiful minimalism.

It’s by no means the best digital notebook on the market. But it effortlessly lives up to the company’s distraction-free ethos. The monochrome display is easy on the eyes, and I found it lightweight and very comfortable to hold for extended periods.

The low latency means your writing appears almost instantly on the screen, as if ink really is dripping from the nib of the exceptional Marker Plus stylus. That’s especially true when using no-nonsense pen types like the fineliner and ballpoint pen, but even the stylish calligraphy pen only has a minor lag. Like its black-and-white predecessor, the battery also lasts for weeks on a single charge.

(Image credit: Future)

Where it stumbles on the hardware front is the lack of those two core features that fans really wanted from this latest model: a frontlight and a 300ppi pixel density for improving the ereader experience. Bafflingly, both are absent here.

That probably won't put off most new users from getting the Paper Pure — and it really shouldn't, because beyond those omissions, the tablet's handwriting experience is superb. But the inclusion of one or the other might've sweetened the deal a little more.

As ever with reMarkable, though, the mostly excellent hardware is let down by the mixed bag on the software side. The handwriting-to-text conversion is still not perfect, requiring adjustments to your writing style to make it work. And locking key features and even templates behind a subscription paywall stings, considering the cost of the device.

If you already own a reMarkable 2, I can’t recommend the upgrade just yet. Sure, the Paper Pure is faster, with a better processor and double the memory (here you’re spoiled with a whole 2GB RAM). However, it’s otherwise largely the same experience. And for what it’s worth, I still prefer the softer writing of the older device compared to the firmer but smoother one found on the Paper Pro and Paper Pure series.

However, if the Paper Pure is your first foray into distraction-free note-taking, the price alone makes this the best place to start.

reMarkable Paper Pure: Price and availability

(Image credit: Future)

• The cheapest reMarkable yet — but not a budget device
• Connect subscription is essential for business users, an unnecessary nice-to-have for everyone else

The Paper Pure is pitched as the most affordable of the reMarkable range, coming in at $359 / £359 / AU$629 for the tablet and standard Marker stylus.

You can also upgrade to the Paper Pure bundle for $399 / £399 / AU$699, which includes the tablet, colored sleeve, and the upgraded Marker Plus.

For what it’s worth, I’d always opt for the Marker Plus, which features an eraser at one end. It retains that pad-and-pencil feel, and being able to delete handwritten notes without tapping into the menu, selecting the Erase option, then manually lassoing the writing you want to remove is far better for flow.

Some notable corners have been cut to keep costs down. The Paper Pure isn’t as thin as the reMarkable 2; it’s got a plastic chassis rather than an aluminum one, a monochrome display unlike the color Paper Pro, and, disappointingly, there’s no frontlight here.

The upshot, however, is that this is one of the cheapest 10.3-inch handwriting tablets around. At under $400, it’s more or less in line with the Boox Go and Amazon’s base model Kindle Scribe (2024), although both of those tablets boast app support and 300ppi displays.

On top of the hardware costs, there’s the Connect subscription, which comes in at $3.99 / £3.99 / AU$6.99 a month. This unlocks a range of extras that some — particularly business users — will want, such as Slack and calendar integration, and AI summaries. You can see the full breakdown of Connect features by clicking here.

Without a Connect subscription, you can still convert handwriting to text, connect to third-party cloud storage services, and share your screen. So, for general users, I wouldn’t call it essential, especially if you’re ultra-focused on distraction-free writing and sketching. But you will be missing out on a lot of features.

While that subscription may sting considering the price of the Paper Pure, it’s still relatively cheap, and I can’t fault the hardware design at this price point. For my money, reMarkable still comes closest to reproducing that paper-like feel compared to competitors.

reMarkable Paper Pure pricing

reMarkable Paper Pure

reMarkable Paper Pro Move

reMarkable Paper Pro

With Marker

$359 / £359 / AU$629

$449 / £399 / AU$779

$629 / £559 / AU$929

With Marker Plus

$399 / £399 / AU$699

$499 / £439 / AU$849

$679 / £599 / AU$999

reMarkable Connect

$3.99 / £3.99 / AU$6.99

• Value score: 4 / 5

reMarkable Paper Pure: specs

(Image credit: Future)

The reMarkable Paper Pure uses the same dual-core processor found in the Paper Pro Move with 32GB LPDDR4 RAM, which makes overall performance feel snappy.

At 6mm thick, the Paper Pure is thicker than both the Paper Pro (5.1mm) and the ultra-thin reMarkable 2 (4.7mm). However, it weighs just 360g, making it far lighter — and noticeably so — than the reMarkable 2 (403.5g) and the weighty Paper Pro (525g).

reMarkable Paper Pure specs

Starting price:

$359 / £359 / AU$629

Operating system (as tested):

reMarkable OS (Linux-based)

Chipset

1.7 GHz dual core Cortex-A55

Memory:

2GB LPDDR4 RAM

Storage:

32GB

Display:

10.3-inch monochrome Canvas, based on E Ink Carta 1300

Size:

228.1 x 187.1 x 6.0mm

Weight:

360g

Battery:

3,820mAh (rechargeable /replaceable)

Supported file formats:

PDF, EPUB (importing)

PDF, PNG, SVG (exporting)

Supported cloud services:

reMarkable, Google Drive, Microsoft Onedrive, Dropbox, Slack

reMarkable Paper Pure: display

(Image credit: Future)

• Perfect paper feel for writing and sketching
• Black-and-white screen with no frontlight

The Paper Pure uses an E Ink display — it’s a really clever technology used by a lot of handwriting tablets and ereaders. Beneath the glass, there are millions of microcapsules that can turn black or white depending on whether they’re positively or negatively charged.

When you move the stylus — in my case, reMarkable’s Marker Plus — over the screen, the device tracks its position and sends a positive charge to those exact coordinates, pulling the negative black particles to the surface.

It’s the same principle that applies when you turn the page of an Amazon Kindle, with the system telling each microscopic ball whether to display in black or white. These microcapsules stay in that state until told otherwise, which is why the battery can last so long on these devices.

But we’re getting sidetracked here.

The result is a seamless writing experience. reMarkable says the latency between the stroke of the stylus and the words appearing on-screen is around 21 milliseconds. And while I’m not Superman and my eyes don’t operate at that speed, it feels about right.

To me, it feels pretty much instantaneous when using standard pen types like the ballpoint pen or fineliner. It’s about as close to using a pad and pen as you can get in digital form. When switching to a more stylized writing tool, such as the calligraphy pen or the pencil, I saw only a minor lag.

In terms of the feel of writing, there’s a clear distinction between the Paper Pure and its 10-inch predecessor.

Using the reMarkable 2 felt very soft, like using a thick pencil or felt tip on the first page of a new Moleskine notebook. The Paper Pro Move felt firmer but smoother, as if writing with a biro on the last few pages of a well-worn legal pad. And since the Paper Pure uses the same active stylus and textured glass cover lens display as the Pro and Pro Move, reMarkable's newest tablet falls into the latter camp.

Personally, I loved the tactile feedback of the reMarkable 2 — it’s still the best digital writing experience I’ve ever had — but after 10 minutes with the Paper Pure, I found myself enjoying this new writing style.

Saying that, there are three issues here. I wouldn’t call them deal-breakers, but it’s worth highlighting them.

There’s a clear tapping each time you lift and then lower the stylus to make your next mark on the page. It’s not especially loud — it won’t drive colleagues, friends, or the other customers at the cafe to distraction — but it is present.

And there were two big fan requests for the follow-up to the reMarkable 2: 300ppi, which is a better resolution for reading eBooks and PDF documents, and a frontlight. The reMarkable Paper Pure delivers on neither of these.

Now, for writing, I didn’t find the 226ppi to be an issue at all. Handwriting still looks sharp, the display is easy on the eyes, and the writing tools perfectly recreate the ink-on-paper style. But for reading documents, you will see a slight pixel blurring around the edges of words that’s noticeable if you’re coming from something like the Kindle Scribe.

For me, the lack of a frontlight is the biggest misstep. I can live with a lower pixel density, and I can accept the demise of the EMR stylus, but I think a frontlight is an absolute must these days. I get it — it’s all about keeping costs low — but the addition of lighting for day and night use would’ve made the Paper Pure a much more attractive proposition.

• Display score: 4 / 5

reMarkable Paper Pure: Design & build

(Image credit: Future)

• The plastic case feels surprisingly durable
• It’s lightweight and feels good in the hand

Perhaps the Paper Pure’s most significant shift from its predecessor and the Paper Pro line is the switch from a metal to a plastic casing. Having grown used to the hardy aluminum frame of the reMarkable 2, I was seriously skeptical about this change. But it really works.

The rear side of the Paper Pure is oh-so-lightly textured for better grip, and the tablet as a whole is more lightweight and portable, clocking in at a svelte 360g. Overall, it feels delightfully comfortable to hold with one hand or rest on your knee as you sketch and write.

Because of the switch to plastic, the Paper Pure also feels a lot more durable than its predecessor, which I tended to handle with kid gloves while on the move.

I mean, I wouldn’t drop it off the side of a ten-story apartment block and expect it to survive. It’s not a rugged tablet by any stretch of the imagination; it’s not even waterproof. But the Paper Pure certainly feels like it could take a few knocks in your rucksack or survive a violent commute — especially when slipped inside the reinforced sleeve.

Design-wise, you’re looking at a 10.3-inch tablet that’s identical in width to, but slightly shorter than, the reMarkable 2. The thick white bezel on the left is reminiscent of the original reMarkable 1.

Flipping over the Paper Pure, I found something very interesting: ten screws allowing access to the internals. Now, whether this is just a sop to EU regulations that mandate a right to repair or whether the reMarkable intends to provide replacement batteries in the future, I don’t know. But it might make the reMarkable Paper Pure a more viable investment for IT managers maintaining a fleet of devices if nothing else.

At the top of the device, there’s the power button, and at the bottom, a USB-C port for charging. And that’s your lot. Talk about distraction-free. The Paper Pure has everything it needs and nothing it doesn’t.

(Image credit: Future)

The Marker magnetically attaches to the right side of the tablet, where it’s charged. It feels good in the hand, and it's not too heavy for prolonged writing sessions.

The replaceable nibs are estimated to last about a month or two if you don’t press down too hard, and that feels about right. For what it’s worth, the one on my reMarkable Paper Pro Move lasts about that long, and they very visibly wear down at a slower rate than the reMarkable 2 pen tips.

As I’ve mentioned before, the Marker and Marker Plus are the same active styluses used by the Paper Pro range. These are proprietary tech, so don’t lose them, because they're a lot more expensive to replace than the cheaper third-party EMR stylus that worked with the reMarkable 2.

On that note, I liked the Paper Pure's new polymerweave sleeve folio — there are three available, in mist green, desert pink, and ocean blue. This flips open on one side and is vastly superior to the original reMarkable book folio, since it actually protects both tablet and stylus. Slot the device inside, and it'll automatically go to sleep, which is a nice touch for conserving battery.

• Design score: 5 / 5

reMarkable Paper Pure: Software

(Image credit: Future)

• Distraction-free but not feature-free
• The AI optical character recognition can be hit-and-miss

You can tell a lot of love has gone into the Paper Pure's hardware. I’m not sure the same can be said for its software. Sure, it's functional, and it does more than you might think, but it’s nothing to (digitally) write home about.

reMarkable has always been a bit spotty when it comes to the software side of things. We tend to get marginal updates, tinkering here and there, the inclusion of this or that integration, but nothing ground-breaking. And maybe that’s fine. Maybe we just expect too much.

Still, the brand is getting better every time, adding extras like a very useful handwriting search function, the ability to draw freehand shapes, and the ability to add text blocks to notebooks, typed via the on-screen keyboard (sadly, there’s no support for an external keyboard right now). I especially enjoyed using the screen share feature, which I found works very well, letting you present or write on pages pretty much in real-time.

For absolute basics, you’re looking at a broad selection of templates like ruled paper, gridlines, and even music sheets, with more available to Connect subscribers via reMarkable Methods. I’m still not convinced templates like daily planners and calendars need to be locked behind a subscription — especially considering the price of the device — but there you go. Put up or shut up.

You can also integrate the tablet with Slack, Microsoft’s OneDrive and Outlook, Google Calendar and Google Drive, and Dropbox. While you can integrate with all the cloud services, you can only add a single calendar integration.

As I use a restrictive work account on Slack, I couldn’t test that particular feature. However, OneDrive and Google Drive both synced quickly, importing and exporting files to and from the tablet as PDFs without delay.

While the Paper Pure’s display may be monochrome, I chose different colored highlighters for annotating the PDF documents. And I was pleased to see they all rendered clearly and correctly when I picked up the file from Google Drive.

One point of interest is that reMarkable requires access to see, edit, create, and delete all of your Google Drive files, rather than at a folder level. This, I really hate, and I recommend doing what I’ve done: create a reMarkable-only Gmail account instead of using your main one. It’s probably fine, but why take the risk?

FutureFuture

Handwriting conversion is probably the big software highlight, transforming handwritten notes into usable text you can paste into a word processor. This is, effectively, optical character recognition in the cloud. And it’s one of the main reasons I originally bought a reMarkable. The results are... ok. With some caveats.

Firstly, you can’t just write any old squiggles that only you understand and pray the AI knows what you’re getting at (as I learned with my own spidery, illegible scrawl). If you’re anything like me, when I’m in the writing flow and my brain is working faster than my hand, you’re going to run into problems.

Secondly, I found the best results came when using the fineliner or ballpoint pen. Here, the translation was flawless, albeit oddly formatted. When I switched to the calligraphy pen, the Optical Character Recognition (OCR) struggled to make sense of the words even when I wrote ultra-neatly in all-caps.

Finally, if you’re making a list, you’ll absolutely need to add a dash before the word, otherwise the tool just lumps it all into a single line.

It’s a so-so experience that does the job if you take the time to work with the OCR tool, but it could be so much better.

• Software score: 3 / 5

reMarkable Paper Pure: Performance

• A faultless writing experience
• Faster and smoother than the reMarkable 2

Responsive is how I’d describe the reMarkable Paper Pure. Starting the device from sleep, opening notebooks, scrolling menus, pinching and zooming, swiping through documents — it all feels fast and smooth. There’s none of the lag that dogged the older reMarkable 2.

There’s also no delay when writing on the screen, which is the real high point. There’s a genuine fluidity to the Paper Pure that I appreciated, making the experience practically faultless on that score.

There’s a welcome snappiness to using this tablet. I know speed isn’t the main priority with a device like this — it’s all about how well it digitizes handwritten notes. But, for me, the performance of the Paper Pure is the killer reason anyone would want to upgrade from the reMarkable 2.

To help you visualize the difference between the two models, I compared the scrolling speed of the reMarkable Paper Pure (right) and the reMarkable 2 (left) in the video below.

• Performance score: 5 / 5

reMarkable Paper Pure: Battery

• 3,820mAh battery is an upgrade over the reMarkable 2
• Lasts for weeks on a single charge

The reMarkable Paper Pure has a built-in 3,820mAh battery. The company says it lasts up to three weeks, depending on your use. Based on my testing, that seems accurate.

I’ve been using the Paper Pure daily for hours at a time over the last couple of weeks without needing a recharge. The only reason I plugged it in during that time was out of caution, not necessity.

For comparison, the reMarkable 2 boasted a 3,000mAh battery, and I typically squeeze about three weeks out of that device already. The Paper Pro has a 5,030mAh battery but uses color E Ink and a frontlight, which drains faster than the black-and-white tablets, lasting about two weeks.

Likewise, the battery inside the Marker Plus lasts a long time. Charging is quick — you do so by attaching it to the side of the tablet — but I don’t recall it ever dropping below half during my entire review process, and you’ll see a battery meter briefly pop up each time you clip it to the side.

• Battery score: 5 / 5

Should I buy the reMarkable Paper Pure?

(Image credit: Future)reMarkable Paper Pro Move scorecard

Attribute

Notes

Score

Value

The cheapest reMarkable yet. It may lack a frontlight, but for the price, it’s a top entry-level handwriting tablet.

★★★★☆

Display

The monochrome display is perfectly sized and textured to recreate the feel of writing with a pad and pen. I found it very easy on the eyes when used indoors and outdoors.

★★★★☆

Design

The lightweight tablet is delightfully comfortable to hold for extended periods of time. It feels like it has a surprising amount of durability, too.

★★★★★

Software

It’s simple, has plenty of integrations and features (some subscriber-only). But what should be the highlight — converting handwriting to text — needs work to get accurate results.

★★★☆☆

Performance

Superb performance that’s fast and fluid, whether navigating menus or writing on the screen. There’s no discernible lag.

★★★★★

Battery

The tablet has exceptional battery life — expect it to last weeks on a single charge. The same can be said for the stylus, which rapidly charges when attached to the device.

★★★★★

Buy it if...

You're a born writer or sketcher
The Paper Pure is a pitch-perfect portable device for authors, architects, UI designers, and anyone else who needs to sketch or write at work. It perfectly recreates that pad-and-pen feel.

You’re a student
For the price, the Paper Pure is arguably the best handwriting tablet around. It feels durable enough to survive days on campus, and lets you focus on your work without being distracted by apps.

Don't buy it if...

You actually like distractions, thank you very much
If you want a standard tablet with all the bells, whistles, and essential apps with the added bonus of writing or drawing with a stylus, you’re better off with an Apple or Samsung device.

You’re an avid ebook reader
While I didn’t have any problems using the Paper Pure to read documents, the pixel density is lower than I’d recommend for a true ereader, and it doesn’t support buying Kindle books anyway.

Also consider

reMarkable Paper Pro
It’s got a larger screen, a bigger battery, and displays in color. If the Paper Pure feels too basic for your needs, this is the true upgrade device from the same stock.

Read our full reMarkable Paper Pro review

Kindle Scribe (2024)
You could go for the newer 2025 model, which excels as an ereader. But if you’re focused on writing, I find the 2024 edition of the Kindle Scribe has a superior feel and is similarly priced to the Paper Pure.

Read our full Kindle Scribe (2024) review

reMarkable Paper Pure

reMarkable Paper Pro

Amazon Kindle Scribe (2024)

Price:

$359 / £359 / AU$629

$629 / £559 / AU$929

$399.99 / £379.99 / AU$649

Price for premium edition:

$399 / £399 / AU$699 (Marker Plus)

$449 / £429 / AU$749 (Marker Plus)

$449.99 / $429.99 / AU$729 (64GB, Premium Pen)

Display:

10.3-inch, monochrome Canvas display, based on E Ink Carta 1300

11.8-inch Canvas Color, based on E Ink Gallery 3

10.2-inch E Ink Carta 1200

Supported files:

PDF, EPUB (importing) | PDF, PNG, SVG (exporting)

PDF, ePub

PDF, unprotected MOBI, PRC natively; PDF, DOCX, DOC, HTML, EPUB, TXT, RTF, AAX (Audible audio format)

Storage:

32GB

64GB

16GB

How I tested the reMarkable Paper Pure

(Image credit: Future)Why you can trust TechRadar

☑️ 100s of tablets and e-readers reviewed
☑️ 15 years of product testing
☑️ Over 16,000 products reviewed in total
☑️ Nearly 200,000 hours testing tech

I tested the reMarkable Paper Pure for two full weeks, using it daily to make notes for work, then in the evenings, I was doodling and writing that novel I always promise myself I’ll definitely finish.

Basically, I replaced my beloved reMarkable 2 and Paper Pro Move solely with the Paper Pure during this review period.

Once I connected the device to my existing reMarkable account, I could check how quickly documents synced between the different tablets, as well as the cloud integrations. I spent time loading various PDFs onto the Paper Pure, annotating and highlighting them before importing and exporting the files across supported services.

Next, I tested the writing experience using all available pen types — officially called Writing Tools — to explore the latency differences between them. After this, I began examining other software features, such as different templates. More time than I’d like to admit was spent with the AI handwriting conversion tool here, with me attempting to see how to get the best results.

Finally, I compared the speeds of the three reMarkable tablets to gauge overall performance, from navigating menus to writing on-screen, with a stylus in each hand.

Throughout the review process, the Paper Pure was slipped inside the misty green sleeve folio for protection when not in use.

Read more about how we test

• First reviewed: May 2026

I never thought I'd find a Tatiana Maslany role I enjoyed as much as Orphan Black, yet here we are. Maximum Pleasure Guaranteed is Apple TV's latest thriller, following on from recent huge releases like Margo's Got Money Troubles and Widow's Bay, and it's another fantastic release from the streaming service.

Here, Maslany plays newly divorced mother Paula, who has been spending time with Trevor (Brandon Flynn), a camboy. Since Paula's ex-husband has main custody of their daughter, she spends lonely nights talking with him, which inevitably leads to more.

Unfortunately for Paula, her private life doesn't stay that way for very long. During a session with Trevor, a masked man bursts into his apartment and starts beating him up. Paula films the attack, only to be told it's "not a real crime" when she tries reporting it.

Things take a darker turn from this moment on when Trevor calls her, begging for a $50,000 ransom, otherwise he'll be killed. She can't pay this, of course, and is spooked when she gets a call from Trevor and an accomplice on her work number. Considering she never shared that information, it's clear she's in trouble, and Trevor demands the money; otherwise, he says he'll ruin her life.

Trevor also coldly reveals that he’ll publish their secretly recorded interactions and ruin Paula's chance at maintaining custody, a threat that's not to be taken lightly.

It's good old-fashioned blackmail, and that's the catalyst for the rest of the ten-part series. Paula must balance her complicated divorce from Karl (Jake Johnson) alongside the stress of being blackmailed, with plenty of twists along the way.

Maslany is perfectly cast as she works to keep her job, be a good mother to her daughter, while trying to unravel who is blackmailing her. Maximum Pleasure Guaranteed does center on how mothers, and women in general, can be so harshly judged by those around them to the point where evidence that Paula did connect with a camboy could ruin her life, just as the mysterious accomplice told her.

Maximum Pleasure Guaranteed is one of those shows I wish had been released all at once. It's moreish and binge-worthy, so waiting a week between episodes might feel annoying. Even if it doesn't always balance the tonal shifts from humor to seriously shocking moments, I was largely impressed by the twists and turns throughout; it did keep me guessing.

As Paula falls deeper into this rabbit hole, we meet a great supporting cast of the various people in her life. Nobody here feels miscast; everyone does a great job at bringing the totally wild story to life, even if it's Maslany that shines throughout.

There's enough to help it stand out among the abundance of thriller shows across the best streaming services, and it's well worth hanging on to your Apple TV subscription so you can enjoy a new episode each week.

It really does feel like we're spoiled for choice there at the moment, with many of my current favorite shows having a home on Apple TV.

Saily launched in 2024 under Nord Security, the company behind NordVPN, and it shows. Most eSIM providers are purely in the connectivity business: buy a plan, get data, done. Saily takes that baseline and adds a layer of security tools built directly into the service, including an ad blocker, web protection, and virtual location, none of which cost extra.

For travelers who already think about what happens to their data on public Wi-Fi in airports and hotels, that combination in a single app is worth paying attention to.

Plans start at $3.99 for 1GB in most destinations, and the coverage spans 200+ destinations through a mix of country, regional, and global plan types.

Saily: Plans and pricing

Instead of pushing everyone toward expensive unlimited plans like Holafly often does, Saily lets you choose exactly how much data you need.

There are also regional and global plans if you are moving between countries, with options that can last up to a year for longer trips. The Global plan covers 121 destinations, while Saily’s full catalog stretches across 200+.

If you do go unlimited, there is one thing worth knowing. You get 5GB of high-speed data each day, and once you burn through that, speeds drop to 1 Mbps until the daily reset kicks in.

Region

Data Amount

Validity

Price

US

3 GB

30 days

$8.99

UK

3 GB

30 days

$8.99

UK

Unlimited

15 days

$71.99

Australia

3 GB

30 days

$7.99

Japan

3 GB

30 days

$6.99

India

20 GB

30 days

$38.99

China

3 GB

30 days

$9.99

Saily: Features

Saily is one of the few eSIMs that actually prioritizes security because it sits inside the Nord Security ecosystem. This matters if you are regularly on public Wi-Fi in airports, hotels, or cafes abroad, where network-level threats are easy to ignore right up until they are not.

• Virtual location: Saily's virtual location feature lets you browse from over 115 different locations worldwide, effectively masking your real location. This feature operates at the network level rather than through a traditional VPN app, meaning it works with mobile hotspots without registering as a VPN on your device. You can access geo-restricted content, use home services while abroad, or simply browse more privately with a few taps in the app.
• Ad blocker: The built-in ad blocker uses DNS filtering to remove intrusive advertisements, helping you save mobile data while browsing. Unlike browser-based blockers, this works at the network level, blocking domain-hosted ads across all apps and browsers on your device. Some website-hosted ads may still appear, but the feature reduces data consumption and improves browsing speeds.
• Web protection: Saily automatically blocks access to known malicious websites and limits online tracking. This works in the background without manual setup, protecting against phishing attempts and malware using NordVPN's anti-phishing technology.
• Flexible plan management: Saily allows multiple eSIMs under a single account with easy top-ups through the app. You can purchase plans up to 30 days before activation, and they activate automatically when you reach your destination. Real-time data usage tracking and an 80% usage notification round out the management tools.

Is Saily Ultra worth upgrading for?

Saily Ultra is built for people who already pay for NordVPN, fly often enough that airport lounges feel less like a luxury and more like a reasonable ask, and want their eSIM, security suite, and travel perks consolidated into one monthly line item.

At $59.99 a month, you get 30GB of high-speed data before speeds drop to unlimited at 1 Mbps. It also includes one airport lounge pass and one fast-track security pass each month, both of which roll over for up to three months if you do not use them.

If your flight is delayed by two hours or more, an extra lounge pass is automatically issued. On top of that, there is a $5 monthly Uber credit and access to the full Nord Security bundle, including NordVPN, NordPass, NordLocker, and Incogni.

I personally see the 8% cashback in Saily credits as a nice little bonus. It starts to feel genuinely useful once those credits add up from regularly buying plans.

Whether the full package is worth $59.99 really depends on what you are already paying for elsewhere. If something like NordVPN is already part of your monthly stack, the value starts making a lot more sense than it might at first glance.

Saily: Installation

(Image credit: Saily)

To install Saily, just download the app, pick a plan, and the eSIM installs in a few taps. The profile downloads over Wi-Fi and activates automatically when you land, which means you step off the plane connected without having to open the app or fiddle with settings at the airport.

Activation does require an active internet connection, so setting up before you leave is important. Saily makes this clear during onboarding, and the in-app guidance walks you through the process without needing to contact support.

Saily: Performance

Saily partners with major local carriers, including AT&T, T-Mobile, Vodafone, and Orange across its network. You can expect 5G speeds where available, with actual performance depending on location and local infrastructure.

Coverage is going to depend a lot on where you are traveling. When I used Saily in Thailand last year, it connected to the True network and worked well even when I was outside Bangkok. Vietnam was a different story. Hanoi, in particular, has been a weaker spot, with airport connectivity sometimes struggling to get beyond 3G on Vietnamobile.

If you are traveling through Southeast Asia, it is worth checking which local network Saily partners with at your destination before you land.

Saily: Customer support

(Image credit: Saily)

Saily offers 24/7 live chat assistance directly through the app. If something goes wrong mid-trip, you are working through in-app chat rather than email, which is the right call for time-sensitive issues. Response times are fast, with connections to support agents typically happening within minutes.

The help resources inside the app cover the most common setup problems without needing to contact anyone. For issues that do require human support, the support generally does not give up after one failed suggestion.

Saily: Competition

Saily has real limitations worth knowing before you buy. The data-only constraint is the most obvious one, and if you need a local number, Airalo and Holafly have options that Saily simply does not.

Coverage in more remote areas is where Airalo and Airhub usually have the upper hand, which matters if your trip takes you beyond the usual tourist-heavy spots. Saily’s real advantage is the built-in security. At this price point, no comparable provider bundles an ad blocker, web protection, and virtual location into the base plan without charging extra.

Saily: Final verdict

Saily is worth considering if online privacy is something you already factor into how you travel. The security tools are built in, genuinely useful in regions with censorship or unreliable public Wi-Fi, and they come at no extra cost above the data plan.

The Global plan's 121-destination coverage is narrower than the 200+ headline figure suggests, and if you are visiting a single country where local SIM cards are easy to find, cheaper options exist.

For multi-country trips where you want one app, one install, and built-in privacy tools without paying extra, Saily holds up well. And if airport lounges and NordVPN are already line items in your monthly stack, Saily Ultra at $59.99/month is worth running the numbers on.

Saily: FAQsCan I make phone calls or send SMS messages with Saily eSIM?

No, Saily is a data-only eSIM service. You cannot make traditional phone calls or send SMS messages through the Saily connection. You can still use VoIP apps like WhatsApp, iMessage, Skype, or FaceTime for calls and messages over data.

Do I need the internet to activate my Saily eSIM?

Yes, you need an active internet connection to activate your Saily eSIM, which is why setting up before departure is recommended. The plan itself does not activate until you arrive at your destination or 30 days after purchase, whichever comes first.

Can I reinstall my Saily eSIM on a different device?

Yes, Saily allows you to reinstall your eSIM on a different device as long as you use the same email address to log into the app. You can only use the eSIM on one device at a time, and reinstallation requires an active internet connection, so make sure you have a data source available when switching devices.

Nomad is a global travel eSIM provider offering prepaid data plans across a wide range of destinations, founded in 2020 by LotusFlare, Inc., and headquartered in Santa Clara, California. The travel eSIM market has quickly become crowded.

However, Nomad has maintained its position due to its clean app, honest pricing, and reliable coverage in places beyond just London and Tokyo.

The setup is quick, activation is straightforward, and the pricing sits well below what most domestic carriers charge for roaming. For the most part, it just works. Sure, you will come across the occasional complaint about slower speeds or patchy connectivity, but those feel more like exceptions than the general experience.

Nomad: Plans and pricing

Nomad's pricing is based on data usage and destination, with rates starting at $0.66/GB for some European countries. That number is worth sitting with for a second, because most people assume travel data has to be expensive. It doesn't, at least not with Nomad.

Here's an overview of current starting rates by region:

Region

Data range

Validity

Starting from

Global

1 GB-20 GB

7-30 days

$5.15/GB (123 destinations)

Global-EX

10 GB-50 GB

10-365 days

$2.17/GB (54+ destinations)

North America

Varies

Varies

$2.20/GB (US, CA, MX)

Europe

Varies

Varies

$0.66/GB (35+ destinations)

Asia-Pacific

Varies

Varies

$1.02/GB (14+ destinations)

Africa

Varies

Varies

$4.50/GB (11 destinations)

The listed prices are really just your entry point. What you end up paying depends on how much data you need and how long you are away. Yes, if you are willing to figure things out after landing, a local SIM can sometimes save you a few bucks. But Nomad helps you sort it before the trip, land, switch it on, and your phone is already connected while everyone else is still standing around trying to get a signal.

Nomad: Features

Nomad keeps things lean on features, but what it does offer is well thought out. There is a subscription plan for Europe regulars, multi-device sharing, and a referral programme that actually pays out.

Nomad pass

If you travel to Europe more than once or twice a year, Nomad Pass is worth a close look. For $3/month, you get 1 GB of Europe regional data as a standing base, plus a 15% discount on any add-on plans you purchase. It is not a replacement for a full data plan on longer trips, but as a monthly subscription that keeps you covered for quick runs to London, Milan, or Amsterdam without having to buy a fresh plan every time, it is genuinely useful. (The latest version of the Nomad app is required to access it.)

Multi-device support

Nomad lets you share your eSIM data across multiple devices, which matters more than people realize until they're trying to get their laptop online from a hotel room in Tokyo. Smartphones, tablets, and laptops: it works across all of them, and managing it stays within the same app.

Nomad perks and referral programme

Nomad runs a referral programme where both you and up to five friends each receive $5 off plans priced at $5 or more. It is a straightforward reward structure without the fine print gymnastics that make most referral programs frustrating. There are also broader perks and discounts on travel-adjacent services like accommodation and tours, which add value beyond the data plan itself.

Nomad: Installation

(Image credit: Nomad)

Buying and activating a Nomad eSIM takes a fraction of the time. You purchase through the website or the iOS and Android app, receive a QR code by email, scan it with your device, and the carrier profile installs itself. From there, activation is a few taps in your device settings.

The smarter way to use Nomad is to install your eSIM before you leave home, because the profile installs over Wi-Fi and you can set it to activate automatically once you land in your destination country. That means stepping off the plane and being connected before you reach passport control.

The one thing to watch: Activating your plan too early (before you're actually in the destination region) will start burning your data allowance, so hold off on switching it on until you're ready to use it.

Nomad: Coverage and speed

(Image credit: Future)

Nomad covers a broad range of destinations worldwide, putting it firmly in the top tier of travel eSIM providers by reach. Real-world connectivity is generally solid across the regions that matter most: Western Europe, Southeast Asia, East Asia, and North America all perform well in practice.

Regarding speeds, Nomad typically delivers 4G/LTE and 5G connectivity, with actual speeds depending on your destination and local network conditions at any given time. Peak-hour slowdowns in dense urban areas like Tokyo are a known occasional issue, but not something you should expect to run into regularly.

Nomad: Support

(Image credit: Nomad)

Most of what you'd need help with is already answered in Nomad's help center, which covers the full setup journey through visual guides, step-by-step articles, and a searchable FAQ spanning everything from installation to billing.

Support runs through a ticketing system powered by Intercom, accessible from both the website and the app, across more than eight help categories covering troubleshooting, billing, account management, and general eSIM questions.

While there’s no phone line, the help center offers over 100 articles that effectively address a range of traveler issues.

Response times are fast, even on weekends, and the 24/7 availability across time zones is not just a claim on the website. If something does go wrong, support is typically the part of the experience that holds up.

Nomad: Final verdict

Nomad is a solid contender for anyone who travels internationally more than a couple of times a year and wants connectivity sorted before they leave home, rather than figured out on arrival. It is not the cheapest option for every destination, and if you are heading somewhere, a local SIM is easy to grab at the airport; it may not need to be your first call.

For multi-country trips, frequent Europe travel, or simply not wanting to think about connectivity at all, it is worth considering. The product works without requiring you to understand mobile networks to use it, and that straightforwardness is genuinely harder to find than it should be.

Nomad: FAQsIs Nomad eSIM good for the USA?

Yes, and specifically because of the network coverage. Standard Nomad US plans run on the AT&T and Verizon networks, which gives you strong reach not just in cities but on highways and in rural areas too. Unlimited plans switch to T-Mobile's network instead. The US eSIM supports 4G/LTE and 5G speeds depending on your location, and plans start from $2.20/GB under the North America bundle.

Is Nomad better than Airalo?

Nomad and Airalo both offer plans across a wide range of countries, and the honest answer is that neither is universally better: the right choice depends on your specific destination and data needs. Nomad tends to offer more flexibility in plan sizes, and its per-GB rates in Europe are particularly competitive.

The price gap between the two is usually small enough that support quality and app experience become the deciding factors, and Nomad holds up well on both fronts.

Is Nomad eSIM secure?

Yes. Nomad eSIM is built on GSMA-approved security protocols, the same standards used by major global carriers. When you activate your eSIM by scanning a QR code, the profile is encrypted end-to-end and bound directly to your device. It cannot be removed, copied, or transferred to another phone, which makes it significantly more secure than a physical SIM card that can be cloned or swapped.

Nomad also follows PCI DSS standards for payment processing and does not sell or share your personal data. The one-time QR code used during installation is protected against reuse or interception.

What happens if my phone with Nomad eSIM is stolen?

Contact Nomad's support team immediately. Because your eSIM is locked to your specific device, a thief cannot extract it and use it in another phone. Nomad's support team can help you secure your account and deactivate any active plans remotely.

To reduce risk before anything happens, it is worth enabling device-level protections like a passcode, Face ID, or Touch ID, and keeping your account credentials unique and strong. Two-factor authentication on your Nomad account adds another layer of protection worth switching on.

Who is behind Nomad eSIM?

Nomad eSIM is a business line of LotusFlare, Inc., a telecommunications infrastructure software company headquartered in Santa Clara, California. Nomad was launched in 2020 with a mission to make international travel connectivity easy and affordable for everyone. The full eSIM platform is built on LotusFlare's DNO Cloud.

May has been a strong month for new horror movies, but as we approach the end of the month, it's safe to say that Passenger is the weakest of the bunch. A disappointment indeed, considering how interesting the trailer looked.

Passenger follows an unconvincing couple Tyler (Jacob Scipio) and Maddie (Lou Llobell), who have traded the Big Apple for an RV, which they're using to live a simpler life on the road. I wasn't hugely impressed by their dynamic here, unfortunately, which posed some problems as we spend the majority of the movie with these two leads.

On their journey, Tyler and Maddie learn that the roads are haunted (because of course they are) by an evil apparition called The Passenger. They learn all about him from an RV enthusiast called Diana (Melissa Leo), but there's nothing all that interesting about The Passenger and his backstory. This is the point in a movie where you'd hope to get some cool exposition, but it falls flat.

After being warned not to drive at night and if you have to, not to stop, Tyler and Maddie naturally ignore this advice when they witness an accident. Following on from this typically dumb horror movie decision, The Passenger hitches a ride and terrorizes them, simply because he can, I guess.

In my opinion, the Passenger exists to provide a lot of cheap, annoying jump scares and little else. There's nothing particularly interesting about this horror antagonist at all, and he has a weak backstory, which is a missed opportunity in my eyes, given how the trailer and marketing hyped the concept of him up so much.

The atmospheric lighting throughout the movie is very cool. (Image credit: Paramount Pictures)

I've been quite harsh so far, so let's examine some of the positives. Yes, it's a scary movie. There are scares in abundance as mentioned above, so this is not a slow burn, psychological horror at all. If you are the horror fan who loves being scared and having things jump out at you, then you will not be disappointed. Be warned, though, the trailer does spoil a lot of them.

Unfortunately, I find it lazy, so this technique of randomly jump-scaring the audience with no build-up or clever camera work (aside from one scene, where it does work) got boring real fast. We've seen this done a hundred times before in similar movies. Demonic creature screams out of nowhere, we jump, rinse and repeat. It doesn't work if you don't have the strong, compelling lore or tension building to go alongside it.

The cinematography is very good, though, especially when it comes to tight spaces. It is atmospheric, but it seems to rely on this too much. The movie is well shot and looks good; the red backlighting is especially cool, but I was expecting a lot more.

Passenger's predictability is disappointing too. If you've seen a lot of horror movies, you won't be surprised by many of the reveals or scenes that were intended to shock. In a world with so many fresh, exciting new horror movies, it falls by the wayside.

Despite the underwhelming nature of Passenger's final destination, it's worth seeing if you simply want a scary movie that will make you jump out of your skin. If you're more interested in the fright-filled journey than the end of the road, you might have a better time than I did.

But from a director like André Øvredal, who was behind the brilliant Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark, I expected something far better.

Passenger is in theaters globally now.