TechRadar Reviews

News

Reviews

Updated: 1 hour 10 min ago

AI just made my favorite Skullcandy earbuds worse — and I’m not sure anyone asked for it

Wed, 02/18/2026 - 10:30

Skullcandy Method 540 ANC: Two minute review

For all that companies try to squirrel AI chatbots into every gadget possible, I’ve yet to see many buyers who genuinely want this kind of addition. In fact more often than not, the infiltration of artificial intelligence makes the tech worse — many companies are starting to realize this and take a step back. But there’s now a new victim of the AI war: the Skullcandy Method 540.

For context, let’s look at some earbuds that would have gotten onto our list of the best cheap earbuds if not for how competitive 2025 was. I’m talking about the Skullcandy Method 360, which were some of my favorite buds of the year: they fit great, sounded fun and were fairly affordable. The 540 are the updated model of 360, with Skullcandy apparently not taking a leaf from Microsoft’s naming playbook – don’t get your hopes up for a Method One and then Method Series X, then.

New models should, ostensibly, bring upgrades over the previous iterations. However the Skullcandy Method 540 have the same design, drivers and carry case design as the previous model. They’re incredibly similar buds, yet cost about 25% more.

So what’s actually new? Well, there are a few tiny tweaks here and there, but the flagship ‘feature’ is compatibility with Skull AI. This is Skullcandy’s AI assistant, built on Bragi AI which in turn is built on Open AI. So for all intents and purposes, you’re paying more for a built-in chat-bot…

…except that you’re not, because Skull AI is available as a separate subscription, which you have to pay for either monthly, at $4.99 / £4.99, or annually (at $49.99 / £49.99). Skull AI is one of the better AI chatbot names I've heard, but I'm not including an evaluation of the chatbot itself in this review: it’s very much a separate, optional product to the Method 540.

If you use AI chatbots, perhaps the Method 540 is worth considering, but the vast majority of buyers are going to wonder if there are any other spec improvements to justify that price bump, or if this is another case of AI implementation taking precedence over actual upgrades. Spoiler alert: it’s the latter.

The specs are identical – in fact, I copied and pasted the specs table from my 360 review to save time. In some cases, keeping things similar is great: the buds are comfortable and fit incredibly well, making them great for runners or gym-goers. In some cases, an upgrade was needed: I liked the Method 360’s sound, but budget buds have come on leaps and bounds in just one year, and the Method 540 aren’t as competitive.

Since I gave last year’s Skullcandy earbuds four stars, and these are basically the same thing, some might be wondering where half a star went. That was removed because the Method 360 was good for the price, and the 540 price hike makes them a less appealing prospect.

Given the increased cost, the lack of upgrades and the shoehorned AI mode, it’s just hard to get as enthused about the Method 540. And so it’s harder to recommend them, given how many low-cost rivals there are in 2026.

Skullcandy Method 540 ANC review: Specifications

Component

Value

Water resistant

IPX4

Battery life (quoted)

11 hours (earbuds), 29 hours (total)

Bluetooth type

Bluetooth 5.3

Weight

11g / Charging case: 72g

Driver

12mm

Skullcandy Method 540 ANC review: Price and availability

(Image credit: Future)

Announced in January 2026
RRP $149.99 / £129.99 (roughly AU$250)
Skull AI costs $4.99 monthly

The Skullcandy Method 540 ANC were unveiled on January 8, 2026, at the annual CES tech conference. That release falls only nine months after the release of the Method 360.

You can pick up the earbuds for $149.99 / £129.99 (roughly AU$250, though there’s no word on an Australian release just yet). That’s a notable price hike over the Method 360, which sold for $119 / £99 / AU$189, and are even cheaper now thanks to some discounts.

That retail price doesn’t even take into account the monthly cost of Skull AI. Access to this AI assistant costs $4.99 per month or $49.99 per year – regional pricing wasn’t available at the time of this review – but it’s worth noting that Skull AI is optional and starts with a 3-month free trial.

Skullcandy Method 540 ANC review: DesignFutureFuture

Chunky carry case
Incredibly reliable in-ear fit
Only black or white options

You know how wireless earbuds makers constantly one-up each other to make svelte little carry cases? Skullcandy didn’t miss the memo – it received it, laughed at it, screwed it up into a ball and threw it away. The Method 540 buds come in a tube, and you slide out the central column to reveal them.

The 360 used the same mechanism, although it’s a little thinner this time around: it measures 3.6 x 2.9 x 10.2 cm, and weighs 72g. At the time of writing, the buds only come in black or white, but Skullcandy often releases funky colors for its products, and hopefully it’ll follow for the 540.

This is not a convenient way to carry earbuds – the monolith doesn’t fit well in trouser pockets. But honestly, I don’t mind – I ended up just putting it in my jacket or bag instead. Perhaps I’ve grown used to these chunky cases from testing other such buds, or maybe petite carry cases are overrated. Plus, a magnetic mechanism makes sure it stays shut tight when not in use, a carry hook means you can attach them to your keys or bag, and unlike in the 360 the charging port is out in the open.

Evidence of how easily-bendable the hook is. (Image credit: Future)

My biggest annoyance with the old model remains, though: putting the buds in the case isn’t convenient, as you have to put them in, in a very particular fashion. It takes quite a bit of maneuvering and flipping to make sure they’re in right, and quite often I’d only realise I’d bungled the job when the case wouldn’t shut properly.

Skullcandy has trimmed the fat of its carry case, but it hasn’t touched the earbuds from the last-gen models – and it didn’t need to. Like the 360, the buds fit snugly and reliably, thanks in part to the grippy eartip material, but mostly due to the fins which wedge the buds into your ear. I went for runs with the buds and took them to the gym, and they never threatened to fall out.

They’re not that light, at 11g, or protected, with IPX4 (no protection against dust, only protected against splashes). But they’re not going to fall out into a puddle thanks to the lovely fit, so it doesn’t really matter.

Each bud has touch controls if you tap on their body, which generally felt okay to use, once I got used to tapping the right spot.

Design score: 3.5/5

Skullcandy Method 540 ANC review: Features

(Image credit: Future)

ANC is solid, not best-in-class
Battery life is above average: 11 hours from the buds/29 including the case
App misses some basic features

Technically, these buds are sold as the Skullcandy Method 540 ANC, and so naturally these buds have Active Noise Cancellation. It’s no more advanced than on the 360: pretty solid, but not best-in-class. Loud noises will cut above the silence, though the background hum of city life will get stripped away.

Stay-Aware falls into the trap that many transparency or surround-hearing modes do, in that it seemingly amplifies more than it strips. Thankfully, Skullcandy has included an Intensity slider in the app, so you can turn down its effects.

According to Skullcandy, the Method 540 lasts for 9 hours with ANC on, or 11 hours with it off, and I’d concur with those estimates. That goes up to 23 or 29 hours when factoring in the extra power offered by the case. And that's good, honestly – any earbuds capable of lasting over 7 hours with ANC on represent above-average stamina.

(Image credit: Future)

You’re required to download and use the Skull-iQ app in order to use the 540’s extra features – not the standard Skullcandy one, something I only discovered after downloading the wrong one. I made the exact same error with the 360, but if I say it now, hopefully I save a few of you from making the same mistake.

The app lets you toggle ANC modes, play with a 5-band equalizer, turn on low-latency mode, use the earbuds as a remote phone camera trigger, enable Spotify Tap or set up multipoint pairing. Oh, and the main menu has two separate options for Skull AI. Notably missing perks include the ability to customize touch controls, any kind of fit or listening tests or a find-my-earbuds feature. Any one of these would be a more useful addition than an AI chatbot, as would a more advanced equalizer, or extra presets beyond the three available.

During testing, I had a few temporary Bluetooth drop-outs, but they all resolved themselves quickly.

Features score: 3.5/5

Skullcandy Method 540 ANC review: Sound performance

(Image credit: Future)

12mm drivers and Bose tuning
Less bassy than Skullcandy norm
EQ tweaking is mandatory

On paper, the Skullcandy Method 540 match their predecessors in terms of audio specs: 12mm drivers, tuning by Bose, and a total lack of support for any Bluetooth or high-res streaming codecs.

It’s fair to say I was complimentary of the 360’s sound, but I can’t quite say the same about the 540. Partly, it could be because my ears have been spoiled by some fantastic budget rivals in the last year. But there also seem to be tuning differences too.

Skullcandy has a reputation for offering bass-heavy products, something that’s levelled either as a criticism or high praise, depending on the listener. People who sit in the former camp probably haven’t read this far into the review. The Method 540, however, seem to buck this trend. Simply put, they're not all about that bass.

These buds are relatively and surprisingly neutral for Skullcandy products. Treble is more powerful, the low end is sensibly is pared-back, mids are… well, we can’t hope for miracles. This new face would be an interesting twist, except that it reveals that there’s not much else going on under the surface.

(Image credit: Future)

Songs sound a little flat, with nothing to replace the lost bass injection, to add a little energy into proceedings. And it sounds like the top was lopped off to the detriment of some treble frequencies and musical passages; hi-hats, guitar stings and vocal flourishes do sound compressed.

There’s a lack of a meaningful soundstage, so instruments are tripping over each other to be head. When you listen to songs like Wake Up by Arcade Fire, or All My Friends by The Revivalists, what should be an encompassing cacophony of noise sounds more like a music track being played from a phone. I checked out Atmosphere by Joy Division after it was featured in The History of Sound, and even in the remastered version, it sounded like Ian Curtis was playing every single instrument. What about some noughties rock, right in Skullcandy’s core demographic? The guitar riffs of Yellowcard’s Ocean Avenue sounded heavy and dull – even if the wall of sound of the chorus picked up the energy a little.

Saving the Method 540 is the app. I always listened on Bass Boost, which went some way in restoring the Skullcandy sound – these things have the capability for decent bass if you can coax it out. I also dabbled with the equalizer. Though it only has five bands, it lets you add a bit of needed chutzpah to music. And the max volume is still high, so you can rock out at max power.

Sound performance score: 3.5/5

Skullcandy Method 540 ANC review: Value

If you’ve been paying close attention, you’ll have noticed that the Skullcandy Method 540 earbuds don’t offer that many upgrades over the 360… well, other than the higher price, and optional chatbot.

Given that it’s basically the same product, but for about 25% more, the Method 540 don't feel like they offer great value for money. That’s doubly true given that the older buds have seen price cuts of around 30% off, depending on where you live.

Value score: 3/5

Skullcandy Method 540 ANC review: scorecard

Amazfit Balance 2 review: An outstanding fitness tracker, but so-so smart features

Wed, 02/18/2026 - 09:02

Amazfit Balance 2: One minute review

Two years after the original Amazfit Balance was released, Amazfit has now released its follow-up, the Amazfit Balance 2. The new release represents a solid upgrade with a distinct focus on durability, battery life, and enhanced sensors/features. In real terms, that means a bigger battery, superior water resistance, a brighter display, a faster chipset, dual speakers, and sensor upgrades.

The watch itself is pitched as a multi-sport training partner. Direct competitors include the Garmin Venu 4, the Coros Pace 4 or the Huawei Watch GT 5.

With such fierce competition in the market, we're unlikely to see the Amazfit Balance 2 featuring in our best running watches guide, but that doesn't mean it's not worthy of consideration, as evidenced by our four-star rating.

The single most impressive feature of the watch is the multi-week battery life. With many watch alternatives forcing customers to choose between features and battery life, the Balance 2 delivers a flagship-level experience with remarkable longevity. This means less charging anxiety and better continuous tracking, especially for multi-day trips or long activity periods.

In terms of software, the addition of Zepp Flow AI is a significant step forward. Watches, for a long while, have supported voice assistants such as Amazon Alexa, Siri or Garmin’s native voice assistant, but these have required specific rigid commands. Zepp Flow AI, along with the most recent wave of Android watches which now use Gemini on Wear OS 6, understands and responds to conversational, natural speech.

Despite these upgrades, it’s a long way off the Apple Watch Ultra 3 or the Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 as a smartwatch. But it’s not really looking to compete on the same plane. The Balance 2 is a middle-of-the-market smartwatch that is looking to push what is possible for under $300/£300.

(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)Amazfit Balance 2: Specifications

Component

Amazfit Balance 2

Price

$299 USD / £299 UK / $479.99 AUS

Dimensions

47.4mm wide, 12.3mm thick

Weight

42g without strap

Case/bezel

Aluminum alloy and fiber-reinforced polymer

Display

1.5-inch AMOLED (480x480px)

GPS

Dual-band (L1 + L5) with support for GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BDS, QZSS, Navic

Battery life

Up to 10 days of heavy use, or 21+ days of typical use

Connection

Bluetooth 5.2, Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, NFC

Water resistance

10 ATM

Amazfit Balance 2: Price and availability

$299 USD / £299 UK / $479.99 AUS
Sits comfortably in the middle of the market
An impressive feature set considering the price

At $299 USD / £299 UK / $479.99 AUS, the Balance 2 sits comfortably in the middle of the smartwatch market. It’s more expensive than the Amazfit Active 2 ($99 / £99.98 / AU$149.99) but not as pricey as the Garmin Venu 4 ($450 / £450). In terms of features, specs, and price, the Balance 2 is probably most comparable with the Samsung Galaxy Watch8.

The Balance 2 offers a respectable set of features considering its sub-$300/£300 price tag, but it's not as mature or refined as the Garmin Venu 4. If you care deeply about advanced fitness analysis and reliable structured workouts, then you'll want the more premium Garmin. If, on the other hand, you care little for these more advanced fitness tracking features, then the Balance 2 serves up a reasonable alternative with an equally impressive display and fantastic battery life.

Value score 4.5/5

(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)Amazfit Balance 2: Design

Small and lightweight design
1.5-inch AMOLED display with 2,000 nits brightness
10 ATM (100-meter) water resistance

The Balance 2 offers a classic circular watch design. In terms of materials, there’s an aluminum alloy alongside a fiber-reinforced polymer case, and this blend of materials is about as premium as you're going to get at this price point, similar to the Garmin Vivoactive 6. .

The watch is 47.4mm wide and 12.3mm thick. It also weighs a minimal 42g without the strap. As a result, the Balance 2 sits comfortably without overpowering the wrist muscles or looking unnecessarily bulky. I'm looking at you, Huawei Watch Ultimate 2. The orange silicone strap creates a gorgeous contrast with the black case while delivering the added benefits of water resistance, a comfortable feel, and easy cleaning after a sweaty run.

The Balance 2 boasts a 1.5-inch AMOLED display, which is protected by highly scratch-resistant sapphire glass. This is a significant upgrade over the standard tempered glass of its predecessor and means users don't have to worry while engaging in some activities which might damage the watch. Maybe most impressive is its peak brightness of up to 2,000 nits, which puts it towards the elite end and equal with the Apple Watch Series 11. As a result, I had no problems using the watch even under direct sunlight, not that there was a huge amount around during winter in the UK.

(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)

For those engaging in water sports, the Balance 2 offers substantial ruggedness with a 10 ATM (100-meter) water resistance rating. This goes beyond standard swimming and showering, making it suitable for high-speed water sports and even shallow scuba diving, which is an impressive level of durability for a smartwatch positioned outside of the ultra-premium or dedicated dive watch category.

The watch includes a digital crown for tactile scrolling through menus, although it feels a little on the cheap side. Additionally, dual speakers and a microphone contribute to the design, enhancing the ability to take clear Bluetooth calls and use the Zepp Flow AI voice assistant.

Design Score: 4/5

Amazfit Balance 2: Features

Zepp Flow AI for natural voice controls
21-day battery life
Improved sensors and dual-band GPS

With a middle-of-the-range set of health and fitness tracking features, I was actually more intrigued by the Zepp Flow AI, which offers a natural way to interact with the watch. Through natural language, it is possible to engage the watch, perform health queries, and control activity tracking. I didn't have to memorize a set of predefined commands but could instead treat it like I treat any other AI engine, such as ChatGPT or Gemini.

Then there's the advertised 21-day battery life that is possible with typical usage. This is an upgrade from 14 days in the original Balance and reduces the need for regular charging. The three-week battery life drops to around 10 days with heavier usage, or if you want to perform continuous GPS tracking, then you'll get 33 hours. For real-world results, I get into battery performance in the next section.

(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)

In terms of sports and health tracking, the Balance 2 incorporates a newer BioTracker 6.0 PPG optical sensor, which Amazfit claims has a specific benefit on the accuracy of measured heart rate and sleep data. There's also dual-band GPS, which is known for its higher accuracy and improved reliability, especially in challenging environments like cities or dense forests.

The Balance 2 features 32GB of onboard storage, which is essential for anyone wanting to exercise, navigate routes and listen to locally stored music without needing their phone with them.

Features Score: 4/5

Amazfit Balance 2: Performance

Exceptional battery performance
Accurate tracking
Solid and reliable GPS

Let's begin with one of the best-performing elements of the Balance 2—the battery life. I had no problems achieving the advertised 21 days of battery life when using the device to track the occasional workout alongside regular health checks. When I increased my GPS use and switched over to the Always-On Display, the battery life dropped to just a week, but that’s still very impressive. Whatever your smartwatch habits, the Balance 2 is streets ahead of more powerful watchOS or Wear OS alternatives such as the Apple Watch or Google Pixel Watch, making it more like Garmin or Coros: a top low-power choice for multi-day hiking, long cycle rides, or more demanding adventures.

As for charging, the proprietary charging cradle has a USB-C attachment. During testing, I only had to recharge the watch a handful of times, but when I did, I was able to achieve 0 percent to 100 percent in a little under two hours. Faster recharging is available on other smartwatches such as the OnePlus Watch 3, but Amazfit has opted, instead, for a steadier power delivery to preserve the battery's long-term health.

In terms of tracking performance, Amazfit has updated the BioTracker from version 5.0 to 6.0 which boasts significant improvements in terms of accuracy, certification, and Zepp OS support. The watch delivered accurate heart rate and blood oxygen readouts with comparison tests run on the demonstrably accurate Huawei Watch Ultimate 2.

Additionally, the watch features an improved six-satellite GPS system with a new Huangshan 3 chipset and upgraded antenna and signal processing. In real terms, the watch locked onto a strong signal as soon as I moved out of my house and maintained it while tracking through a number of tricky environments, including a built-up city, forest area, and rural areas. To test accuracy, I compared a number of bike rides and runs against onthegomap.com and my benchmark-accurate smartwatch, the Huawei Watch Ultimate 2. I found the Balance 2 to be accurate with very little drifting, even when traveling long distances.

(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)

Map interaction left a lot to be desired, unfortunately. Despite the upgraded chip, the Balance 2 struggled to render high-resolution maps and labels in real time. The presence of a lag meant I quickly lost interest in using the map feature.

The watch is powered by Zepp OS 5, which is one of the most fluid and responsive operating systems I've experienced. I also loved using Zepp Flow, which is the AI-driven voice assistant. With it I was able to perform actions hands-free, including starting and stopping workouts, as well as interact with notifications. This was a big time saver and super handy at times when I couldn’t easily operate the watch’s menus.

As good as the Balance 2 is for health and fitness tracking, it's seriously let down by its lack of third-party apps such as Spotify, Apple Maps, and Strava. Even Garmin has integration of sorts with apps like Spotify via the Garmin Connect IQ store. This lack of deep ecosystem integration means that the watch remains largely isolated from everything else you might interact with on a daily basis. There's also no LTE/cellular option, which means it's unable to work independently from your phone.

Performance score: 4/5

(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)Amazfit Balance 2: Scorecard

I had high hopes for this cheap, well-designed vlogging camera – but then I reviewed the footage

Wed, 02/18/2026 - 09:00

SJCAM C400: one-minute review

The SJCAM C400 is an ultra-compact action camera that comes with an optional handle accessory, transforming it from a tiny wearable cam into a handheld vlogging setup. Starting at around $160 / £155 (without the handle), it undercuts the latest offerings from DJI and Insta360 by a significant margin — but unfortunately, you get what you pay for.

The camera itself is charmingly small and lightweight, making it easy to wear on a pendant or fix to a hat for POV filming. It includes a built-in touchscreen, which is a huge boon compared to similarly sized rivals like the DJI Osmo Nano or Insta360 Go cameras, which lack this feature.

When slotted into the handle, the C400 takes on a whole new character, becoming a comfortable handheld vlogging camera with a rotatable screen that works for both horizontal and vertical content, with the added benefit of an extra battery.

However, image quality is where the C400 seriously stumbles. Despite supporting 4K at 30fps and various video modes, the footage is poor, with an odd combination of over-sharpening and under-detail, plus prominent muddy digital artifacts. Still photos don't fare much better, with detail falling off drastically towards the frame edges. When compared directly to footage from an Insta360 GO Ultra or DJI Osmo Nano, the difference is stark — and it becomes immediately clear why those cameras cost a little more.

Audio quality doesn't help matters. While the built-in microphone copes indoors or in calm conditions, it struggles with wind noise, and there's no option to connect an external mic.

The digital stabilization works, but in an artificial way that draws attention to itself, while enabling horizon leveling drastically reduces resolution. There's also no built-in waterproofing or magnetic mounting — both missed opportunities on a camera this size.

On the plus side, battery life is impressive, with the camera managing around 190 minutes of 4K recording on its own, and much longer when docked in the handle.

In short, the C400 offers an appealingly compact form factor and decent battery life at a bargain price, but its poor image and audio quality make it hard to recommend unless budget is your absolute priority. I'd recommend checking out one of my recommended alternatives in my best action cameras and best vlogging camera guides.

The core camera unit is small and lightweight, and unlike its rivals has room for a functional touchscreen on its front (Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)SJCAM C400: price and availability

Priced from $159 / £153
Sold with and without handle
A range of accessories is available

The SJCAM C400 is available in three bundles: the C400 Pocket (just the camera with no handle or accessories); the C400 (which includes the handle); and the C400 Vlogging Bundle (which includes the handle, a mini tripod, a pendant mount, a 64GB microSD card and a carry case). Prices vary wildly depending on the bundle and the country you're shopping in, and seem to be fluctuating too, so I would suggest shopping around to ensure you get the best price for whatever package you're after.

In terms of value the camera seems like a bargain in comparison to the latest models from rival companies like DJI and Insta360. But considering its level of performance, I think you should seriously consider spending a little more elsewhere, particularly if you value image quality.

SJCAM C400: specsSJCAM C400 specs

Sensor

1/2.8-inch CMOS

Max Resolution

24MP photos
4K 30fps footage

Weight

189g / 7oz (with handle); 54g / 1.9oz (camera only)

Dimensions

143.5 x 38.5 x 38.5mm (with handle); 68 x 32 x 25.5mm (camera only)

Displays

1.3-inch (camera); 2.29-inch (handle)

Operating Time

Camera: 190 mins
Camera + handle: 420 mins

Connectivity

Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, USB-C

Storage

microSD card up to 512GB

Waterproofing

N/A

SJCAM C400: designFuture | Sam KieldsenFuture | Sam KieldsenFuture | Sam KieldsenFuture | Sam Kieldsen

The C400 package I was sent for review has two main components: the C400 camera itself and a handle accessory that incorporates controls, an extra touchscreen, a tripod mounting thread and an additional battery.

The main C400 camera is charmingly tiny and lightweight, if not quite as small as the DJI Osmo Nano or some of the Insta360 Go editions; if you really must have the tiniest, lightest 4K action cam, the C400 isn't it. Still, for POV filming purposes I found it compact enough to wear on a pendant around my neck, or fixed to my hat, without causing any bother whatsoever.

The camera unit has a small touchscreen (which is a huge boon – you don't get one on the DJI Osmo Nano or Insta360 Go), built-in microphone, microSD card slot for storage, and a tiny button that handles power and shutter duties. Sadly, unlike some rivals, it doesn't include a magnet for fixing it easily to metal surfaces, which is a missed opportunity.

Another missed opportunity is waterproofing, which I'd expect on a small action camera. Sadly, it's not mentioned anywhere on the spec or features sheet, although an optional waterproof case (with a 30m depth rating) is available.

The optional pendant mount also includes a magnetic clip add-on for the C400. (Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

When the C400 is slotted into the handle it takes on a whole new character, transforming from mini cam into a handheld vlogging camera somewhat reminiscent of the DJI Osmo Pocket series. The handle has a pleasingly comfortable design, and its good-sized rotatable screen caters to both horizontal and vertical content, and it also gives recording time a boost with its own supplementary battery.

I preferred using the camera in this arrangement than on its own, due to it being easy to hold and control – even if it clearly lacks the physical gimbal-based stabilization of DJI's Pocket range.

Additionally, it works as a wireless remote control for the camera, with a range of around 30 feet.

A quick word on the companion app: it's pretty good! Once it was installed and I'd established a Wi-Fi link between the C400 and my iPhone, I was able to remotely control the camera and download photos and videos wirelessly. Getting the phone and camera linked up the first time was a bit of a struggle, but once the connection was set up I was able to simply re-connect by scanning a QR code on the camera's screen.

The camera supports 4K video capture at up to 30fps, 2K at up to 60fps, and 1080p at up to 120fps (for slow-motion playback), plus H.264 and H.265 compression, a 'wide dynamic range' mode and a high-bitrate recording option.

Despite selecting all of these in an attempt to see the C400 performing at its best, I found image quality to be disappointingly poor even in good outdoor lighting, and even worse indoors.

You can view my sample video below to get a clearer picture (no pun intended), but the image seems to me to be a curious mix of being simultaneously over-sharpened and under-detailed, with distracting, muddy digital artifacts very prominent.

Still photos didn't impress either, with detail falling off massively towards the edges of the frame – and there's a huge amount of wide-angle distortion that doesn't appear to be correctable outside of post-production manual tweaking.

The two forms of digital image stabilization on offer — general and horizon leveling — do work, but they do so in an artificial way that really draws attention to the fact that they're working. Using horizon leveling also reduces the resolution quite drastically.

When compared to the videos straight out of an Insta360 GO Ultra or DJI Osmo Nano, the difference is stark – and it's immediately clear where that extra money goes.

Audio quality is passable in calm conditions, but as my video illustrates, the built-in microphone doesn't cope well with wind noise at all — and there's no way to connect an external microphone to better capture sound. So vloggers may have to record their audio separately, then sync it in post-production, which is hardly the sort of simplicity you'd hope for.

There's better news on the battery life front, at least, and I was impressed by the C400's stamina. To test it, I set video quality to 4K at 30fps and left the C400 (without its handle) recording. It managed to capture around 190 minutes of footage before the battery died. When docked inside the handle, it of course lasts even longer, and in my test it lasted 420 minutes in total.

Should I buy the SJCAM C400?

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)Buy it if...

You want a super-cheap compact action camera
The C400 is about as small and light as action cams come, and much cheaper than new alternatives from DJI and Insta360.

You need a small camera with a screen
The C400 is tiny, but still makes room for a decent-sized touchscreen on its front — something you won't find on pricier rivals.

Don't buy it if...

You’re particular about image quality
The C400's image quality is not its strong point, and if you want to create polished, professional-looking content, you're better off with a DJI or Insta360 alternative.

You want a well-stabilized vlogging camera
Don't confuse this with a DJI Pocket, despite how it looks on its handle. There's only electronic stabilization here, and it's not particularly convincing.

SJCAM C400: also consider

Insta360 Go Ultra

The latest model in the long-running Go series of ultra-compact action cameras, the Ultra is a little larger than some of its predecessors, but makes up for it with its superb 4K 60fps (or 30fps in Active HDR) footage. It's surprisingly capable in low light, and waterproof to boot.

Read our in-depth Insta360 Go Ultra review

DJI Osmo Nano

Despite being DJI's first serious attempt at an ultra-compact action camera, the Osmo Nano is a waterproof modular marvel with stabilized 4K 60fps video that excels for sports and vlogging, and even supports 10-bit D-Log M. It's pricier than the C400, but still cheap for what it offers.

Read our in-depth DJI Osmo Nano review

How I tested the SJCAM C400

(Image credit: Future | Sam Kieldsen)

I tested the camera for a week
I used it for vlogging and capturing photos, assessing image quality on my phone and laptop
I tested all its features and various accessories

I tested the SJCAM C400 for around a week, using it to record videos and photos both handheld and using some of the accessories included with my review sample. The sample was supplied by SJCAM, and included not only the camera and handle, but a waterproof case and range of mounting options such as a magnetic pendant. I tested all its main functions including electronic image stabilization and battery life, before transferring all photos and videos to my iPhone and subsequently MacBook Air for close inspection.

First reviewed February 2026

Categories: Reviews

Ashampoo Movie Studio Pro 3 video editing software review

Tue, 02/17/2026 - 10:38

There are so many video editors out there, from the expensive high-end professional options, to the free ad-laden basic ones, and everything in between.

Ashampoo’s Windows-only Movie Studio Pro 3 is never going to compete against the likes of Premiere Pro and Final Cut Pro - while it's a competent tool, it's not up there with the best video editing software I've tested.

But that's not really the point of software like this. It's not trying to become the go-to for full-time creative professionals in the movie industry. But for those who need to quickly edit videos for social media, or anyone just starting out, it's an affordable entry-point into the world of post-production.

So, with that in mind, I took a look at where Movie Studio Pro 3 fits into the landscape and your workflow.

Ashampoo Movie Studio Pro 3: Pricing & plans

Incredibly well-priced
Windows only

It’s unusual for a software package these days to restrict themselves to a single platform, in this case PC users, but if you’re going to curtail your own market, at least it makes some sense to aim for the one with the biggest share of the pie. So if you’re running something other than a Windows machine, you’ll have to find a solution to your video editing needs elsewhere.

As it stands, Movie Studio Pro is compatible with Windows 7 and above, right up to Windows 11. You’ll need at least an Intel Core i3 or comparable processor, and 8GB of RAM, but as always with this type of software, the more powerful your machine, the better it’ll run.

Cost-wise, it’s advertised as being worth $60 / £50 which doesn’t sound too bad, but Ashampoo regularly offer steep discounts; as of this writing, you could grab it for only $18 / £15. Not only that, but you’re also able to download a copy of the software and try it out free for a generous 30 days.

If you already own a previous version of Movie Studio Pro, the upgrade cost is the same discounted price.

So yeah, it’s not free, but the cost of entry is so low, that should not be an impediment to you getting the software.

Ashampoo Movie Studio Pro 3: Basic Trimming

(Image credit: Ashampoo // Future)

‘Cut Commercials’ lets you trim multiple parts of chosen clips
Very easy and intuitive to use

Launch Ashampoo Movie Studio Pro, and you’ll be faced with various options as to how to proceed.

You can open an existing project of course (if you have one), create one from scratch, or use the software’s ‘Wizard’ to, supposedly, speed up the creation process, but the one I thought we’d look at first is intriguingly labelled ‘Cut Commercials’.

Its purpose is to simply trim sections of a chosen clip. This is ideal if all you need is to top and tail some footage, but it also allows you to cut out multiple sections inside the clip itself (hence the ‘Cut Commercials’ moniker).

None of this is automatic. You have to scroll through the footage and manually select each section, but doing this is incredibly easy, even if what you’re removing isn’t a commercial.

Once you’ve selected all that needs to be removed, you then have a choice of resolution, format and quality, all with big friendly buttons.

So far so good. If the rest of the interface is as easy to use and understand, we have a fun and useful video editor on our hands.

Ashampoo Movie Studio Pro 3: Using the Wizard

(Image credit: Ashampoo // Future)

Easy to insert animated intros and transitions between clips
Not especially useful as a whole

Next, I’m off to see the Wizard, Ashampoo Movie Studio Pro’s Theme Wizard to be precise.

Clicking on that option brings up two more: a ‘Simple’ or ‘Expert’ mode, but that doesn’t alter what the Wizard will do for you - it simply determines the type of interface you’ll be left with once it has done its job.

You get to choose from one of dozens of themes, add a title, select the clips you’d like to use, and put them in the order you’d like them to appear in. Movie Studio Pro will then combine the lot into a short movie, add transitions between each clip, and that’s pretty much the extent of its prowess. It doesn’t even trim the footage. Just puts the whole thing into the timeline. Talk about a rough edit!

I was expecting a Wizard to do more for me than just insert an animated intro and put transitions between clips. Maybe I was expecting too much.

It’s up to you to trim those clips, perhaps change those transitions, and maybe even add a musical score. What the Wizard did is little different than what you could’ve done yourself in a couple of minutes.

It’s barely a time saver, and when you consider all the editing you have to do afterwards, it probably ends up taking up more of your time than if you’d never bothered to use the Wizard in the first place.

Ashampoo Movie Studio Pro 3: Editing process

(Image credit: Ashampoo // Future)

All the basic options are available here
‘Simple’ mode feels too restrictive for experienced video editors

Cutting a movie yourself is where a video editor should show its true colors. Here again, just like for the Wizard option, we’re offered ‘Simple’ and ‘Expert’ modes.

As you’d expect, ‘Simple’ has some restrictions applied to it to try and make the process easier for beginners, but I found it more frustrating than helpful, truth be told.

For instance, why could I only trim a clip in the timeline by opening a special window? It actually adds a layer of complexity that is not needed for what should be a simple, and all too often used, process.

Frustrations aside, you have easy access to your clips, effects, transitions, animations, and even those themes we saw in the Wizard section, meaning you can build an edit pretty quickly.

If you need to move to ‘Expert’ mode, it’s easy to do so from your ‘Simple’ project: there’s a handy button just for that, effortlessly upgrading your interface to Movie Studio Pro’s highest heights of editing complexity.

Be aware, though, that I couldn’t find a way to move my project back to the simpler editing paradigm. Unlike DaVinci Resolve’s editing levels, once you’ve upgraded, you’ve upgraded for good.

As you’d expect, ‘Expert’ offers you more options. For one thing, the effects, transitions, titles, animations, etc, are all on their separate tracks in the timeline, making it easy to select them, alter them, and move them around. ‘Expert’ even allows you to trim a clip within the timeline itself (hooray).

There is one thing I found quite limiting in either mode: the inability to preview a clip prior to adding it to the project. Sure you can see a thumbnail of it, but it would be good to actually play said clip, and maybe even apply some in and out points to it, for instance.

But no. It can only be seen once it’s added to the timeline. Different apps do things in different ways of course, but I found this particularly restrictive. On the plus side, if you liked the cutting options available in ‘Cut Commercials’, they’re only an icon click away in either mode.

Overall, the options you’re offered are good, you can fine tune an edit, and add enough effects, titles, even subtitles, and more, to make your project look good, but I don’t think the software deserves its ‘Pro’ moniker.

There are other packages that offer you many more options, charge even less for it, and they don’t call themselves ‘Pro’.

On the flip side, proper ‘Pro’ video editors can and are intimidating for novice users. Think of this app as a good step up from the software that usually comes bundled with your machine, and viewed from that perspective, it definitely has a place and a purpose.

Should I buy Ashampoo Movie Studio Pro 3?

(Image credit: Ashampoo // Future)Buy it if…

You’re looking for some video editing capabilities beyond what your bundled software offers, you want something that’s easy to use, which doesn’t cost much.

Don’t buy it if…

You’re searching for software that’s more responsive, with more pro tools than this supposedly ‘pro’ software has.

(Image credit: Ashampoo // Future)

For more editors, we've tested and reviewed the best free video editing software, best video editing software for beginners, and the best video editing apps.

Categories: Reviews

Affinity by Canva (2026) review: Three design tools in one, all for free - but is the software an Adobe-killer?

Tue, 02/17/2026 - 05:00

I’ve been dipping in and out of Serif Affinity for years now. It always struck me as a very impressive set of apps designed to compete with Adobe’s core offering: Affinity Designer was their answer to Adobe Illustrator, Photo was their Photoshop, and Publisher took on InDesign, all for a remarkably competitive price.

So what do you do for an encore? You get bought out by Canva for $500 million, of course! This happened back in March 2024 and everything went silent - until a few months ago. That's when Affinity merged all three apps into one and dispensed of licenses to become free for all.

I took a look at the all-new Affinity (sometimes known as Affinity by Canva) to see what's going on and how the new, completely free version stacks up.

Try out Affinity by clicking here

Affinity: Pricing & plans

Free to use
Some optional AI tools locked behind a Canva Pro subscription

Price is the biggest change to the all-new Affinity.

It's completely free. No subscriptions, no perpetual licenses. 'Free forever' is the promise. But there’s no such thing as 'forever' in the business world, so how is Canva expected to make its money back from such a huge investment?

The current answer is by offering most tools for free, while restricting some higher end ones behind a paywall. Canva currently have an impressive 200 million total users, out of which 16 million pay for their premium subscription. The company is banking on Affinity luring a few more to it.

As a guide, Canva Pro would cost an individual $15 / €12 a month, or $120 / €110 a year, which will unlock all those AI tools, as well as everything else Canva’s premium side of things already offers.

So yes, in reality, Affinity is more freemium than free. However, these 'advanced' tools are AI-based, and all the tools you used to enjoy - and pay for - in Affinity 1 and 2, are free in 3.

Right now, and especially if you’re not a fan of AI, you can download, install and make use of Affinity 3 without spending any money. That's a heck of a deal for three Adobe-killer apps. And even if you were to fork out for the Pro subscription, it’s far cheaper than what Adobe charges.

Affinity: Interface

(Image credit: Affinity // Canva // Future)

Superb interface consider it's three apps in one

Launching Affinity for the first time will reveal a slight wrinkle: you need to log in to your Canva account, or create one, before you can use the software. It’s not that big a deal as setting one up is free, and you’ll still be able to access the app when offline.

You may wonder how Affinity manages to combine three apps with vastly different sets of tools, into a single interface. It's achieved by dividing the interface into a number of ‘studios’, which are essentially separate interfaces depending on what you wish to work on.

Toggling between them is done through a menu, top left of the window. By default, you have ‘Vector’ (for Illustrator-type work), ‘Pixel’ (what’s where your photo editor tools are located), ‘Layout’ (where your desktop publishing software tools can be found). And, of course, ‘Canva AI’ if you pay the subscription for AI-laced tools.

But that’s not all.

Click on the three dots to the right of that menu, and you’ll find other workspaces are available, such as ‘slice’, ‘color grading’ and ‘compositing’, and you’ve even got the ability to create your own ‘Studio’, starting by cloning an existing one, and modifying it until it only contains the tools you need.

In that respect, this is a very elegant design. Better still, while working on a project, you can effortlessly switch between studios without having to save your work or anything. You’re in ‘Pixel’ and need to add some curves, just click on ‘Vector’ and carry on working. It’s that simple.

Furthermore, to help designers along in their Affinity journey, mouse over any tool and you’ll get some information about its purpose. Big deal you might think: almost every other software program does that.

True… except here, they go into great detail for each of them, and if that’s not enough for you, there’s a ‘learn more’ button that opens a ‘Help’ window with even more information.

A feature I quite liked deals with additional tools hidden in a single icon. Just like with Adobe, you can tell there’s more there thanks to a little chevron lower right of the icon. In other apps, were you to click on it, it would reveal the additional tools in a sub palette; select the one you need and that extended menu promptly disappears.

Here, it opens up a floating window, making it easy to access those tools again and again should you need to. Click on a different tool’s chevron, and its additional tools will overwrite the previous selection in that floating window, so you won’t end up with a proliferation of floating windows, which can only be a good thing.

All in all, I felt the interface was well designed and considering Affinity now does the job of three apps in one, it all works impressively well.

Affinity: Importing from Adobe

(Image credit: Affinity // Canva // Future)

Importing Adobe projects works - mostly
More complex files can take a while

Importing Adobe documents into Affinity wasn’t as seamless as I had hoped. Now don’t get me wrong, it works, and it works pretty well - for the most part - but there are flaws.

For one thing, although Affinity is broadly on par with Adobe’s tool palette, some are missing. If you created documents with those missing tools, the result may not be replicated perfectly as you import your file into Affinity. For instance, Smart Objects fall into that category.

Another hindrance I found is based on the fact Adobe doesn’t solely make use of the fonts installed on your computer, but also relies on Adobe Fonts, a collection of cloud-based typefaces. If you use those in your work, it won’t come as a surprise to see that those won’t transfer over when you open your project in Affinity. But as long as you only use fonts installed on your computer, you’ll bypass that problem.

Affinity can read PSD (Photoshop) and AI (Illustrator) files without too much problem. INDD (InDesign) ones however, can’t be read. In order to open them, you need to export your work from InDesign into the IDML format (InDesign Markup Language). It’s frustrating, but it’s nothing new: this was the case for when Affinity Publisher existed, before it was merged into this all-in-one new version.

Finally, the worst part of importing I experienced, was the wait. Go to File > Open, select the document you want and… nothing happens. Or at least, nothing seems to open.

You get no progress bar, no nothing, so I was left with the impression that it didn’t work. I tried again, and again, and again… and then after a while all those files eventually opened, one after the other.

This does show Affinity can handle multiple commands at once, which is not a bad thing, but it would be good to know something is happening which you wait for the file to open. Now this doesn’t happen for every document, but the more complex it is, the more likely you’ll have to wait, with no clue as to when your project will eventually deign to appear.

Affinity: Tools

(Image credit: Affinity // Canva // Future)

A huge selection of tools
All well organized with helpful assistants

If you’re used to other design tools, you’ll understand the concept right away. You have a sidebar where all the tools you need are located (these change depending on which studio you’re in as mentioned above).

On the other side of the interface is your contextual inspector, showing you all your changeable parameters, along with your project’s layers, and more. At this rate, you’ve seen one image processing app, you’ve seen them all.

And yes, don’t expect Affinity to possess all the tools Adobe cram into its own software. Adobe is renowned for that. But to be frank, the overwhelming majority of users don’t use all these tools, and if the one you need happens to be missing from Affinity, chances are there are other ways of doing the same - or similar - thing.

But it’s the little things that I greatly appreciated. Say you want to add a new object to an existing project. You get your paint brush, start drawing, only to realise you forgot to create a new layer and are messing up an existing part of your work.

So, you have to undo what you did, and start again. Well that doesn’t happen with Affinity, as a little clever assistant just automatically creates a new layer as you start drawing. It’s not a big deal really, but it makes using this software a more enjoyable experience.

Now of course, as I keep mentioning, some tools are missing if you’re used to Adobe. I brought up Start Objects earlier on, but a bigger omission is the lack of Curve tools in Illustrator - sorry, I meant Vector. You can use the Pen tool instead, but if you’re migrating, it’s another adaptation you need to make. Thankfully, a lot of the keyboard shortcuts are the same, greatly easing the transition.

If you’re upgrading from Affinity Photo, Designer and Publisher, you might be puzzled as to where the filters have gone to in the Pixel Studio: they’re still there, but now they’re located in the menu bar’s Pixel menu, which means you gain access to those filters whichever Studio you’re in, so you could apply one of them to a vector layer if you wish (doing this will get an assistant to automatically rasterise the selected layer for you).

Since you can so easily go from a vector layer to a rasterised one, you’ll be pleased to learn that Affinity can also do the reverse, thanks to its impressive Trace tool. Select the layer you wish to alter, activate the tool, tweak the couple of parameters, check the result before applying it, and you’re good to go. I found the outcome to be remarkably good.

One thing to bear in mind, is that Affinity Photo - now the Pixel section of Affinity - is designed to be a competitor to Photoshop, not Lightroom. As such, it has no file management capabilities, so you’ll need to get yourself a separate app to sort out your images on your computer - or failing that, just be very good at maintaining order in your computer’s file system.

Affinity: Premium AI

(Image credit: Affinity // Canva // Future)

Tools designed for subscription don’t feel good enough to achieve that goal - for now

All of the above is free. It’s a huge gamble, but one that will certainly benefit those who are tired of renting their software by paying expensive ongoing subscriptions to the likes of Adobe and others to gain access to creative tools.

But Canva hopes that you will choose to take advantage of the Premium subscription to gain access to the AI tools now added to Affinity. These include features such as AI-based object selection, generative fill, upscaling, generative edit, portrait blur, lighting, colorise and depth tools.

To be honest, they’re not show stoppers, must-haves, revolutionary tent pole features. In fact, compared to the tools available for free, these feel pretty average at best.

Still, it’s early days, and Affinity may well release over time tools that feel indispensable and worth their - let’s face it - quite affordable subscription. But today doesn’t feel like it’s that day.

Should I download Affinity?

(Image credit: Affinity // Canva // Future)Get it if…

You’re looking for powerful image compositing tools that are free with no strings attached, that combine the best of raster, vector and page layout design, in an impressively well made interface.

Don’t get it if…

You’re 100% wedded to Adobe’s portfolio, and regularly rely on the tools Adobe has, but Affinity lacks.

For more tools, we've tested the best graphic design software you can get.

Categories: Reviews

I became a master of stealth in Styx: Blades of Greed and finished my playthrough with hundreds of guards kicked off cliffs, countless coins pilfered, and a full arsenal of magical abilities

Tue, 02/17/2026 - 03:00

Styx: Blades of Greed isn’t an Assassin’s Creed game. It’s not a Sniper Elite, a Hitman, or part of any of the other popular stealth action franchises that have received new entries in the last couple of years. This is a proper, old-fashioned stealth game - the kind that you really don’t see much of anymore.

Review info

Platform reviewed: PC
Available on: PC, PS5, Xbox Series X and Series S
Release date: February 19, 2026

The focus is entirely on the act of sneaking, surreptitiously sticking to shadows, and creeping around environments in order to avoid detection entirely, rather than trying to blend in or silently take out enemies from afar.

As the titular green goblin Styx, you’re certainly not a fighter, and detection means an almost certain demise. Sure, you can fend for yourself against one or even two low-level enemies in a pinch, but your health pool is extremely limited, and open combat quickly spirals out of control as more guards are alerted by the sound of the fray.

You can hardly break out of a crouch when you’re moving around maps, as your footsteps alone are enough to trigger a chain reaction that inevitably ends with you getting skewered by an army of heavily armed goons. It sounds frustrating, and believe me, it sometimes is, but I simply wouldn’t have it any other way.

Nothing beats the satisfaction of pulling off the perfect heist, and some smart quality-of-life features stop the experience from ever becoming too exasperating.

Styx and stones

(Image credit: Nacon)

Its big innovation is a clever, quick save system. You might see the phrase ‘save scumming’ (the practice of frequently reloading saves made before your mistakes) tossed around as a derogatory term in discussions about other titles, but in Styx: Blades of Greed, it’s not only necessary for success, but actively encouraged.

It’s instant and bound to pressing down the left thumbstick on your controller, with a successful save signaled by a small on-screen notification that doesn’t break your immersion. Get slashed by a guard, fall off a ledge, or accidentally come into contact with water (goblins dissolve instantly like the Wicked Witch of the West, apparently), and you’re back to your save point after just a brief loading screen.

It’s a little awkward at first, but after a few hours, saving every time you make any significant progress becomes second nature, and it’s absolutely liberating.

(Image credit: Nacon)

Rather than annoyingly setting you back, deaths become your signal to experiment. "What would happen if I tossed an acid trap on that carpet just as the guard saw me?” “Can I actually take out that worker without his mate seeing me?” “Would that falling chandelier really land on that armored patrol if I timed it just right?"

Best bit

(Image credit: Nacon)

In this instalment Styx is more mobile than ever before, with an incredibly fast default move speed and rapid double jump. It makes scurrying across open rooftops or darting down empty corridors a joy, and really helps you feel like a devious little goblin.

The game’s three main levels are mammoth and filled with multiple avenues of approach that really reward trying new approaches. With endless ledges, chimneys, the undersides of tables, inside barrels or chests, and maintenance passages, you’re never short of places to hide, and making full use of every available spot in order to infiltrate somewhere flawlessly is satisfying.

Don’t be worried about the fact that there are ‘only’ three maps either. Side quests and collectibles incentivize you to scour them thoroughly, and an intelligent metroidvania-esque progression system sees you gradually acquire new traversal tools like grapple hooks or gliders that open up vast new zones in them to explore.

Each story chapter also ends in unique, more linear segments that are a refreshing change of pace after such openness and help you get acquainted with each new mechanic as they come.

Carrot and Styx

(Image credit: Nacon)

Styx is a seasoned master of infiltration, so he has a wealth of abilities to play around with that are unlocked through a modest but impactful upgrade tree. The most interesting of these are tied to your acquisition of Quartz, the sinister new material that Styx and his rag-tag crew of allies are pursuing.

Mind control has you manually piloting adversaries that would otherwise be too powerful to defeat and commanding them to jump to their deaths, while slowing down time helps you escape otherwise impossible situations in a flash.

This is on top of some returning favorites from the past Styx games, like invisibility, throwable clones that latch on to the faces of foes, plus basic tools like throwable bottles, acid mines, and more. It’s perfectly possible to get through the game without using the majority of these, but fully engaging with every tool at your disposal invites exciting gameplay possibilities.

It’s unfortunate that there are plenty of jagged edges here that might trip up those coming over from more casual stealth experiences. I really appreciate the commitment to make Styx: Blades of Greed a faithful sequel to both Master of Shadows and Shards of Darkness (not to mention a prequel to Of Orcs and Men), but it’s almost too faithful at times when the last instalment was almost ten years ago.

Without knowledge of the previous entries, the otherwise surprisingly decent story isn’t going to make a lick of sense, and many of its coolest moments, like returning to the ruins of an old map, simply won’t resonate.

(Image credit: Nacon)

Even true Styx heads like me might struggle to stay fully engaged with it, given the fairly dire voice acting, though. The performance for the protagonist is excellent, especially his many ironically charming one-liners, but the lines for side characters and NPCs are often amateurish. Cutscenes feel cheaply animated, with stilted motion and odd cuts that never seem to flow quite right.

There’s plenty of more general jankiness to get past, too, from frame rate stutters and typos in subtitles to bugs that see you fall through the floor, get seen through solid objects, or have the entire game crash without warning. Thanks to its strong foundations, the experience was never truly spoiled for me, but I do hope there are some patches in the works to make everything more stable.

Should I play Styx: Blades of Greed?Play it if...

You want a true stealth experience
Fighting back if you’re caught? Forget about it. Styx: Blades of Greed is a true stealth game that’s all about using the tools at your disposal to infiltrate areas undetected - and very satisfying if that’s what you’re looking for.

You’ve played the other games
The story of Styx: Blades of Greed would probably be impenetrable for a newcomer, but if you’re a true Styx head like me, you’ll love diving back into the universe and appreciate the call-backs to other games.

Don't play it if...

You’re not willing to overlook rough edges
This is not a high-budget game, so some level of jankiness should be expected. Still, there are plenty of issues with performance, crashes, and a wealth of bugs to overcome if you want to get to the good stuff.

Accessibility features

Styx: Blades of Greed has three difficulty levels, in addition to a modest accessibility menu. Aside from the option to disable controller vibration, all of the settings relate to color blindness.

There are three vision filters: deuteranopia, protanopia, and tritanopia. Subtitles are enabled throughout the game by default.

How I reviewed Styx: Blades of Greed

I went full goblin and played more than 20 hours of Styx: Blades of Greed on PC over the course of a few days. During this time, I completed the entire game, thoroughly explored all of the levels, tested every single ability, and worked my way through many of the side quests.

The keyboard and mouse support is pretty dire, so I relied on a DualSense Wireless Controller to play in addition to my Astro A20 X gaming headset.

I reviewed the game at full graphics settings on my system, which is a 5070 Ti-powered model from retailer Scan that features a compact Corsair 2000d RGB Airflow case, Asus ROG Strix B860-I Gaming Wifi motherboard, Intel Core Ultra 7 265K CPU, a 2TB WD Black SN770 SSD, 32GB of DDR5 Corsair Vengeance RAM, and an Nvidia 5070 Ti manufactured by Asus.

First reviewed February 2026

Categories: Reviews

The Fractal Scape has no business offering this many features for a wireless headset at this price

Mon, 02/16/2026 - 17:00

Fractal Scape review: one-minute review

The bar keeps being raised in gaming peripherals lately, and as such, there’s no room for overpriced or feature-bloated models whose specs don’t translate to a great user experience. Fractal Design clearly knows this very well as it enters the wireless gaming headset market with a $200 model that looks like something Apple would try to sell you for $500, and comes with a charging dock and feature set that you’ll be more accustomed to seeing from pricer Astro headsets.

The looks will be a big selling point for many, as you’d expect from Fractal and its reputation for understated, Scandi-style PC cases. Available in both black and white, it’s got a grown-up look quite apart from the gaming peripherals of yesteryear, and with a detachable mic and Bluetooth connectivity, you can quite comfortably leave the house wearing the Fractal Design Scape as your smartphone’s headset without broadcasting an overstated ‘gamer gear’ look to the world and its judging eyes.

Also included is a wireless charging station, which will juice up the headset with up to 40 hours of use when RGB is disabled, and up to 24 when it’s enabled. Taking the headset out of the magnetic dock automatically powers it on, which feels like an incredibly decadent feature for this price.

While the materials and design generally lend themselves well to comfort – with a particular shout-out due to the high-grade memory foam earcup covers – this definitely favors a smaller head size, and I have concerns about the amount of padding on the headband itself. If you’ve got a larger head, you may start to feel the headband dig in during longer sessions.

It’s not perfect then, but that imperfection is effectively offset by how generous Fractal has been by adding not just a detachable boom mic but a built-in omnidirectional mic too. Not to mention fundamentally crisp and clear sound with some meaty bass response.

(Image credit: Future)Fractal Scape review: price & availability

List price: $199.99 / £169.99 (around AU$285)
Astro-like features for a far lower price
Priced competitively against Razer Blackshark V2 Pro and PlayStation Pulse Elite

The price point is a big win for Fractal out of the gates. How the manufacturer has managed to bundle a high-quality headset and charging station that look ready to sit in the window of an Apple store is anyone’s guess, but somehow that very thing has been achieved. The choice of two mics and strong construction materials and finish quality are further bonuses that make this a frontrunner in the $150-$200 market.

The competition? Probably still two members of the old guard. PlayStation’s official PS5 Pulse Elite headset features similarly elegant looks and hassle-free wireless operation, while Razer’s older Blackshark V2 is more of an all-rounder that features similar device compatibility to the Scape.

(Image credit: Future)Fractal Scape review: Specs

Fractal Design Scape

Price

$199.99 / £169.99 / around AU$285

Weight

11.8.oz / 338g

Compatibility

PC, Mac, PS5, PS4, Nintendo Switch, iOS/Android

Connection type

2,4 GHz Wireless via USB-A dongle, Bluetooth 5.3, Wired via USB-C to USB-A cable

Battery life

40 hours RGB off, 24 hours RGB on

Microphone

1x detachable unidirectional 50–16 000 Hz, 1x omnidirectional (built-in)

Fractal Scape review: Design & features

Typically minimalist looks
Wireless dock will beautify your desk
Sensible controls layout

Fractal’s headset was never going to be an aggressive, overwrought affair. Its cases are recognizable for their elegant minimalism, and the same is very much true of this Scape. It’s reminiscent at first glance of Steelseries’ Arctis range, but has a ‘debadged’ look and the most minimal of RGB zones that carries through the Scandi operation’s less is more philosophy.

The dock features magnetic connections that keep the headset in place and carries through the understated look, guaranteed to bring some culture and sophistication to your desk, no matter how many Funko Pops it’s sharing the real estate with. A USB-A dongle is hidden on the underside of that dock so that you can plug the dongle into the dock and use the USB cable from the dock to your device’s USB port, keeping things nice and clean and giving you a bit more choice over where to position the dock.

In addition to the usual physical controls at the rear of each earcup (power, wireless/Bluetooth connection, and mic mute on the left, RGB on/off on the right), there’s a ‘control crown’ in the upper-left rear which controls volume and provides some multimedia controls for pausing music and skipping tracks. While every other control works well, feels sturdy, and is easy to find without having to take off the headset, I find the control crown a bit fiddly. It’s too small to make precise volume changes easily, and pressing and holding the crown to pause or skip feels awkward.

With that said, it’s extremely impressive that the two mic options have bespoke mute mechanics. The boom arm is flip-to-mute, whereas the built-in omnidirectional is controlled with a button.

(Image credit: Future)Fractal Scape review: Performance

Strong and precise sound
Great battery performance
Headband comfort can be an issue

Great care has clearly been taken to build a lot of comfort into these cans. That’s most evident when you give the earcup cushions a squeeze and find the most luxuriously squishy memory foam pads you ever squished. This is seriously high-grade material, equivalent to flagship Bose models.

And it’s a vital piece of the comfort puzzle, because the Scape offsets its middleweight heft (11.9oz / 338g is on the lighter side of average for wireless sets now) with a lot of clamping force. The idea is that the tighter the earcups clamp around your ears, the less weight hangs from the headband on top of your head. Plus, you get a nice bit of passive noise cancellation and a tight acoustic chamber for low-end frequencies to resonate in.

(Image credit: Future)

That works on two of three fronts. It’s great at blocking out noise, and the bass response sounds full-bodied. But personally, I still notice the weight of the headband during longer sessions, and when I examine its construction, I find considerably less padding and considerably lower-grade cushion material.

It’s still absolutely possible to adjust the Scape so that it sits comfortably for marathon sessions, by extending the headband as big as possible and thereby placing more emphasis on the horizontal clamping force. But it’s something to keep in mind if your mind is kept within a larger skull.

The sound quality isn’t audiophile stuff, but with a standard-issue 20Hz-20KHz frequency response range, its drivers are more than capable of articulating power, detail, and nuance all at the same time in your game mix. Even with a Discord buddy shouting callouts with their 2011 headset mic.

The battery goes for just as long as the specs suggest, and during my real-world testing, I found more than 40 hours could transpire before I got the beeps. It’s so welcome to have an RGB off button on the headset rather than having to delve into Fractal’s (actually very decent, zero-footprint, web-only) software app, and similarly, I found that enabling the lighting didn’t quite reduce the charge life down to 24 hours. Perhaps I like to play at a lower volume than Fractal does.

Onto the choice of mics. It’s a double-edged sword, this feature, because although it’s incredible value to have two inputs on one headset, the noise cancellation on the unidirectional boom mic isn’t very strong, and external noises can leak into your voice chat. That’s even more true when using the omnidirectional mic, obviously. So: yes to dual mic design, no to the noise cancellation. This is the sort of thing that can be remedied in firmware updates, though, and I really hope it is because otherwise this is an exemplary package, and it’s priced low enough to have established brands like Razer, Logitech G, and Corsair worried.

(Image credit: Future)Should you buy the Fractal Scape?Buy it if...

Your desk needs a centerpiece
The Scape’s wireless charging dock exemplifies the same Scandi minimalism that Fractal made its name with in the case market.

You’re not into flashy RGB
It’s very handy to have an RGB off mode and save some battery life instead.

You like talking but hate boom mics.
There’s a choice of a detachable unidirectional boom mic and a built-in omnidirectional, giving you a very rare choice of outputs.

Don't buy it if...

You’ve got a large head
This headset’s built around a particularly snug fit. Works great on smaller heads, but bigger craniums may notice the headband digging in.

You play in a noisy space
The noise cancelling on the boom mic still allows some ambience through, and even more so when using the omnidirectional option.

You want one headset to rule them all
The combination of a wireless docking station and a lack of Xbox compatibility means this isn’t the all-in-one battlestation headset you’re looking for.

Also consider...

Does this Fractal leave you in two minds? Consider these premium wireless alternatives.

Fractal Scape

Razer BlackShark V2 Pro

PlayStation Pulse Elite

Price

$199.99 / £169.99 / around AU$285

$199 / £199 / AU$349

$149.99 / £129.99 / AU$239.95

Weight

11.84oz / 338g

11.2oz / 320g

12.1oz / 347g

Compatibility

PC, Mac, PS4, PS5, Nintendo Switch, iOS/Android

PS5, PC, Nintendo Switch

PS5, PlayStation Portal, PC, Mac

Connection type

2.4 GHz Wireless via USB-A dongle, Bluetooth 5.3, Wired via USB-C to USB-A cable

Bluetooth, 2.4GHz wireless (Hyperspeed dongle)

Wireless (PlayStation Link via dongle), Wired (3.5mm audio jack), Bluetooth

Battery life

40 hours RGB off, 24 hours RGB on

70 hours

30 hours

PlayStation Pulse Elite
Sony doesn’t do its official console peripherals by half measures. Not only is the Pulse Elite an object d’art, but its specs stack up very competitively among other wireless headsets in the $150-$200 bracket.

For more information, check out our full SteelSeries PlayStation Pulse Elite review

Razer Blackshark V2 Pro
It’s no longer the latest and greatest Blackshark in Razer’s pool, but it’s still pretty great. Wireless, full of features and boasting a ridiculous 70-hour battery life, the V2 can usually be found for less than retail now, too.

For more information, check out our full Razer Blackshark V2 Pro review

How I tested the Fractal Scape

Weeks of daily use on PC, PS5 and iPhone
All connection types tested
Tested in online games, Discord comms, and work calls

This being a wireless product with a ton of usability options, including an on/off RGB battery saving setting, it was important to stress-test the Scape’s stated battery capacity and wireless stability.

That meant tracking hours of use without charge, putting in some long mountaineering sessions in Cairn, and plenty of Discord walk-and-talks to test out the wireless range.

First reviewed February 2026

I've spent 18 hours taking down Big Pharma in High On Life 2, and it's exactly what a sequel should be

Mon, 02/16/2026 - 11:11

High on Life is a game that a lot of people love, but I just couldn't get on with it thanks to its at-times obnoxious comedy and slow, clunky gameplay, so I didn't know how to feel going into Squanch Games' first-person shooter (FPS) sequel. High on Life 2, however, is a remarkable step up in quality from the original, and it's felt right from the beginning.

Review info

Platform reviewed: PS5 Pro
Available on: PS5, Xbox Series X|S, Nintendo Switch 2, PC
Release date: February 13, 2026 (April 20 on Switch 2)

After taking down the G3 Cartel, the unnamed bounty hunter has become a superstar in the galaxy. You'll experience the highs of fame throughout the intro of the game, which manifests itself as a montage that sees you appear on talk shows and reality TV, take down kaiju, and perform a lot of stabbing. But the world comes crashing down soon after as you become the galaxy's most wanted, while yet another entity wants to turn the human race into drugs.

The formula of High on Life 2 remains mostly the same, but instead of hunting down bounties, you're hunting the ranks of a corrupt pharmaceutical company in order to find out the identity of its CEO, and, y'know, kill them too before the massive court hearing to legalize humans for use in drugs takes place. This almost-episodic structure not only keeps things pretty brisk throughout the runtime of the game but also allows it to take wild swings that, for the most part, stick.

You'll be solving murder mysteries on expensive yachts, traveling through various conventions, and casually running into your target on the street. Each of the main hunts felt wholly unique. And this is helped by a unique chapter design, with my highlight – the finance wizard target – embedding classic tropes, genres, and references in a way that feels far more meaningful than your usual "lol remember retro games" throwback.

Funny games

(Image credit: Squanch Games)

Chances are, how you felt about High on Life came down to its stars, the talking guns known as Gatlians. Personally, I found Justin Roiland's Kenny to be nigh-unbearable thanks to the voice performance being the annoying voice he does in Rick and Morty.

High on Life 2 brings most of the sentient weapon cast back, and while I still find Betsy Sodaro's Skweezy to be a bit too much, the return of Michael Cusack as Knifey and Tim Robinson as Creature were welcome returns. And the new additions – namely Ralph Ineson as Sheath and the duo of Travis and Jan – are the highlights of the game.

Comedy is rough in games, but High on Life 2, for the most part, is a far funnier joke. There are still occasional stinkers that made me roll my eyes, but for the most part, I found myself chuckling more, be it from the random non-player character (NPC) dialogue, dumb side quests, or the news reports from Jason Testicles recounting what you just did on a mission. Although my absolute favorite jokes in the game were ones that were so dumb, like your hideout having a "Crane Machine" based around sitcom Frasier or a subplot about Jar Jar Binks (no relation).

Skate or die

(Image credit: Squanch Games)

Where High on Life 2 steps up the most, however, is the gameplay. Gone is the slow, clunky, awkward shooter of the original, and it's all thanks to a plank of wood. High on Life 2's skateboarding mechanic is a game-changer; levels have ample opportunity for you to grind and slide about while dispatching enemies at will. What was once sluggish now feels akin to arena shooters of years past and is uber satisfying once you get skating down. Although it really would've benefited from gyro aiming.

My only wish is that the guns felt as good as the skating. While some of them get a lot better once you've stacked them with upgrades (Creature is a strong example of this), for the most part, the guns – mostly Skweezy and Gus – lack much impact. Gus, in particular, is a contender for one of the worst-feeling shotguns I've used in a shooter for how weak he feels, to the point where I only ever really used him for his disk ability, which I loved. Just like with the comedic chops, the new guns introduced in this game, like Sheath – which is a Halo Battle Rifle – and Bowie – shocker, a bow – were the highlights of the game.

(Image credit: Squanch Games)

High on Life 2 has an incredible intro that packs a ton of storytelling and gags into an effective tutorial segment, chronicling the G3 killer at the height of their fame before the events of the game bring it all crashing down.

High on Life 2's peak is its boss fights. The majority of them are thoroughly enjoyable and wholly unique, from your standard gunfights to puzzle-based encounters and a final boss that is a true gauntlet of how well you know your weapons. Senator Muppy Doo in particular is a highlight, as it has him embed himself in your suit, and you have to continue the fight through the pause and settings menus, with a conclusion that I can't say I've ever seen in a game (well, I have, but it'll make sense when you get there).

Also, the breadth of dumb side stuff returns. You can still go to the movies, but this time around, there's a selection of emulated retro games (with classics like Super 3D Noah's Ark, Bible Adventures, and Gourmet Warriors) as well as the likes of speed dating, the comedy club, and helping out random citizens around the world. I got super into the skateboarding time trials present in each of the hub areas, trying to get the highest times possible, and I spent an embarrassing amount of time watching old commercials in my room (but the Glover N64 commercial popped me big time).

The King Is Half-Undressed

(Image credit: Squanch Games)

Unfortunately, High on Life 2 feels like it could've used a little longer in the oven. Firstly, the visuals – while generally good-looking stylistically – have that smeared-in vaseline look at times. I also found the game either way too bright or impossible to see when I had HDR enabled, with no way to actually adjust the HDR in-game aside from a general gamma slider, so I had to disable it from the console settings to make it less obnoxious.

Performance issues weren't always present, but when the framerate issues hit, they really hit. There's a specific boss that takes place in a field, which is probably the longest boss fight in the game as it is, but the framerate absolutely tanked during this segment, making what should've been a highlight to cap off a great section of the game an annoyance.

This was on PS5 Pro too, mind you, so I can't imagine what the base PS5 or Xbox Series S versions are like. There isn't even a performance option either, just which upscaling mode you wish to use – but frankly, I didn't see a difference between PSSR and TSR in either performance or looks.

Worst of all, however, were the glitches. Multiple times, I would get stuck in the maps or fall through the ground, including one where I was amid a great side quest about going to the zoo with another character, but once I reloaded my last checkpoint, I was locked out of the mission. I also would occasionally get random freezing; while the game never crashed, these could last for a good 20 seconds at their worst. The glitches got even worse towards the end of the game, with the final boss bugging out on me multiple times, between my weapons entirely locking up or the ground just straight up disappearing, sending me into a freefall.

High On Life 2 won me over in ways I didn't expect when it was first announced. It's a funnier, bolder, and – crucially – faster sequel that turns it from a novelty into a strong FPS contender in its own right. But it's also a game that could've seriously used some more time in development as far as performance is concerned.

Aside from those issues, it's a wonderfully imaginative FPS campaign with a Ratchet & Clank-esque level of playfulness when it comes to weapons, set pieces, and levels, and it has turned me from a naysayer to someone who is looking forward to the next one.

Should you play High on Life 2?Play it if...

You're after a unique, fast-paced FPS experience
High on Life 2 takes you through some wonderfully varied levels that make the game feel like it's at a breakneck pace. And the addition of skateboarding makes for blissful movement that feels ultra satisfying once you get it down.

You liked the first game
High on Life 2 is just High on Life, but bigger, funnier, and more confident. It feels like a game that is exactly what a sequel should be, meaningfully building on what worked in the original while targeting its shortcomings.

Don't pt if...

You're sensitive to performance issues
High On Life 2 really could benefit from some extra polish; the visuals can look rough in places, the framerate absolutely tanks itself during certain moments, and the glitches are plentiful.

You really don't like the humor of the first
I didn't love the original game's humor, but there were still some funny jokes in there, even if they were marred by annoying characters or poor delivery. While I'd say it's better on the whole, humor is still pretty similar this time around, with awkward over-the-top exposition, and more.

Accessibility features

High on Life 2 has a number of accessibility features, like speaking indicators, subtitles, and UI size options, and an option for "hyper legible text" for the subtitles, which gives it a bolder font.

There are colorblind options for Deuteranope, Protanope, and Tritanope with a slider to tune how severe these are. But conversely, a lack of rebindable controls and lackluster input settings fall a bit flat.

(Image credit: Squanch Games)How I reviewed High on Life 2

I played High on Life 2 for 18 hours. In this time, I finished the main campaign, all of the skating challenges, and delved into a good amount of side content like the trip to the zoo, escape room, and comedy club.

I played the game on a PS5 Pro between a Samsung Q60D TV with a Samsung HW-T450 soundbar and a Samsung Odyssey G5 gaming monitor with a PlayStation Pulse 3D Headset.

First reviewed February 2026

Categories: Reviews

Optery data removal service review

Mon, 02/16/2026 - 06:55

Optery remains one of the strongest data removal services going into 2026, offering a rare mix of broad broker coverage, flexible pricing, and detailed visibility into what’s being removed from the web. Whether you are an individual, a family, or a business, it is particularly appealing if you want both automation and verifiable proof that the data has actually been taken down.

Data brokers, people-search sites, and marketing databases continue to expand in 2026, making it increasingly difficult to keep personal and professional information under control. Optery positions itself as a dedicated data removal and privacy service, focusing on scanning for exposed profiles and then systematically opting you out of hundreds of sites, including high‑value sources like Google search results. Used alongside other privacy tools such as a VPN, password manager, and antivirus, it helps form a more complete online protection stack rather than a standalone solution.

We found Optery especially compelling because it combines automated removals with human privacy agents on its higher tiers, increasing the likelihood that stubborn brokers will actually comply with opt‑out requests. It is also one of the few services that places a strong emphasis on visibility and documentation, providing detailed exposure and removal reports that show exactly where your information was found and which sites have been cleared.

Optery: Plans and pricing

(Image credit: Future)

Optery’s consumer lineup still revolves around four tiers: a free plan plus three paid subscriptions—Core, Extended, and Ultimate—available on both monthly and annual billing. The free tier focuses on self-service removals and scanning, while the paid plans add automated opt-outs at various levels and human-assisted removals.

Pricing for individuals remains very competitive by data-removal standards. Core starts at about $3.99 per month on a monthly subscription or roughly $3.25 per month with an annual subscription, positioning it among the lower-cost automated data removal options. Extended steps up to around $14.99 per month (about $12.42 monthly on annual billing), and Ultimate sits at $24.99 per month (around $20.70 on the annual plan), which aligns closely with what third‑party reviewers describe as $39, $149, and $249 per year, respectively, when purchased annually.

Coverage scales with price: Core handles removals from roughly 80–100 sites, Extended pushes coverage into the 200+ range, and Ultimate targets all of the 300–600+ broker and people‑search sites Optery monitors, depending on how you count international and niche sources. All paid plans are backed by a 30‑day money‑back guarantee, which makes it easier to trial the service without long‑term risk.

For businesses, Optery offers separate enterprise plans with per‑seat pricing, including Core Pro and Ultimate Pro options that scale to dozens or hundreds of employees and support advanced identity and access controls. Optery also offers discounts and options for family members in some plan structures, helping households and organizations protect multiple people under one umbrella.

Optery: Features

Optery’s feature set is one of its biggest strengths, particularly in how it blends scanning, removals, and proof. Even on the free tier, you get exposure reports, scans of Google search for your personal details, email and phone checks, and self-service opt‑out instructions for many brokers, giving you a strong baseline view of your public exposure.

On paid tiers, Optery moves from self‑service to automation. Core focuses on fully automated “bot‑only” removals across 80–100 sites, typically limited to a single name and one city or state per user. Extended introduces a “humans + machines” model, where automated tools are paired with human privacy agents, expands coverage to 200+ sites, and supports unlimited name variations and historical addresses for the same person.

Ultimate is where Optery differentiates itself most clearly. It adds coverage for the full list of supported data brokers (300+ and, in some third‑party tests, upwards of 600+ total sites checked), unlimited custom removal requests after a short onboarding period, and automated removal requests for outdated content to Google and Bing. Across all paid tiers, Optery provides periodic removal reports—often monthly or quarterly—that include screenshots and status updates, making it easy to verify that profiles have been removed or suppressed.

For families and small groups, Optery offers options to protect multiple people under a single subscription, with discounted rates when you add more members. For power users, there are also advanced capabilities, like expanded reach and maximize‑removals features, that aim to push opt‑outs as widely as possible across related brokers and aggregators.

Optery: Setup

Getting started with Optery is straightforward and mostly guided. You begin by creating an account, choosing either the free tier or a paid plan, then adding basic personal details such as your name, email address, and at least one address to enable accurate matching across data brokers.

Once your profile is set up, Optery runs an initial scan, generating an exposure report that highlights where your information appears and the severity of each exposure. If you remain on the free tier, you can use the dashboard’s links and instructions to submit opt‑out requests yourself; paid users can simply confirm their details and let Optery’s automated and human agents begin the removal process.

Enterprise customers have a more structured onboarding phase, typically involving bulk user provisioning via SSO/SCIM/SAML and policy configuration, but Optery provides admin dashboards and tools to streamline rollout across teams. In either scenario, the initial setup is usually a one‑time effort, after which Optery continues scanning and issuing removals in the background.

Optery: Ease of use

Day‑to‑day, Optery is designed to be low‑maintenance. The dashboard offers a clear overview of your exposure, showing which sites have active profiles, which have been removed, and where follow‑up is still in progress. For most users, the service runs in the background after initial configuration, with periodic emails or PDF reports summarizing progress.

One of the more user‑friendly aspects is the visibility into each broker: Optery often captures screenshots or structured evidence showing your information before and after removal, which helps reassure less technical users that real work is being done. This transparency is an area where it compares favorably to some rivals that provide only high‑level status numbers.

The trade‑off is that the depth of information and configuration options can feel a bit dense if you just want a “set it and forget it” experience, especially in the enterprise portal. Still, for privacy‑focused individuals and organizations, the combination of automation, detailed logs, and clear status tracking makes Optery one of the easier advanced services to live with day to day.

Optery: Security and privacy

(Image credit: Optery)

Because Optery is handling sensitive personal data in order to remove it from brokers, its own security posture matters. The company is headquartered in the United States and emphasizes compliance with major privacy regulations such as CCPA and related state privacy laws, aligning its opt‑out workflow with legal rights to data deletion and restriction.

Optery uses a “humans + machines” model, but carefully scopes what information is shared with data brokers, typically limiting it to what is strictly necessary to confirm identity and process an opt‑out. Features like Maximize Removals and Expanded Reach increase coverage by sending more removal requests, and Optery’s documentation is explicit about the data elements included so customers understand the trade‑offs.

On the infrastructure side, Optery stores account data in secure environments and recommends keeping a subscription active because brokers frequently repopulate profiles and new exposures appear over time, which it mitigates with recurring scans and removals. The Ultimate plan’s integration with Google’s and Bing’s outdated content tools also shortens the window during which exposed data remains visible in search results, reducing the opportunity for bad actors to exploit cached records.

Optery: Support

Optery backs its product with a reasonably comprehensive support ecosystem, centered on a self‑service Help Center and direct email support. The Help Center covers topics like getting started, managing profiles, understanding your exposure reports, enterprise administration, and troubleshooting common issues, which reduces the need to contact support for routine questions.

For more complex or account‑specific issues, users can reach Optery via email, with higher‑tier plans—particularly Ultimate—receiving priority handling. The company also maintains a blog that explores broader privacy topics, provides deep dives on data broker behavior and legal frameworks, and publishes step‑by‑step opt‑out guides that are useful even if you are not a paying customer.

While some rivals now offer live chat or bundled phone support, Optery’s approach skews toward detailed written resources and email‑based assistance, which fits well with its documentation‑heavy, evidence‑driven style. For most technically comfortable users and business admins, that combination is more than adequate.

Optery: The competition

(Image credit: Kanary)

Optery competes in a crowded field that includes DeleteMe, Mozilla Monitor Plus, Kanary, Privacy Bee, IDX, and newer offerings like Incogni and DuckDuckGo’s privacy membership. Each service has its own strengths, and the best fit depends on whether you prioritize automation, international coverage, price, or bundled extras.

DeleteMe is one of the longest‑running names in the space, with a reputation for strong customer service and manual removals, though its coverage and interface can feel more traditional. Mozilla Monitor Plus leans on Mozilla’s broader ecosystem—often packaged with a VPN and other tools—and is attractive if you already trust Mozilla and want a single vendor for multiple privacy services.

Kanary positions itself around fast scans and transparent reporting and directly compares its coverage and speed against Optery and DeleteMe, often at a mid‑range price point. Privacy Bee and IDX tend to bundle identity monitoring and security features with data removal, making them appealing if you want a more “all‑in-one” security suite rather than a dedicated removal tool.

Incogni, which has grown quickly in popularity, focuses heavily on large‑scale automated removals and often comes in cheaper for families, but it may not match Optery’s depth of proof and visibility into each individual removal. Across recent independent roundups, Optery regularly appears among the top recommended personal data removal services, particularly at the Ultimate tier, where its site coverage and reporting stand out.

Optery: Verdict

Optery continues to stand out in 2026 as one of the best data removal services for users who care about both breadth of coverage and transparency into what’s being done on their behalf. Its combination of a genuinely useful free tier, flexible paid pricing, automated and human‑assisted removals, and strong broker coverage—including automated removal of outdated content from Google and Bing—puts it ahead of many rivals, especially at the higher end.

There are trade‑offs: the interface and reporting depth can feel like overkill if you just want something completely hands‑off, and some competitors offer more robust real‑time support channels or lower family pricing. Even so, if your priority is claiming control of your personal information across as many data brokers and search results as possible, Optery’s Ultimate and Extended plans are extremely compelling options for both individuals and organizations.

For anyone building a serious privacy stack in 2026, alongside a VPN, password manager, and security tools, Optery deserves a place near the top of your shortlist.

Sign up to Optery

Categories: Reviews

GoDaddy website builder review 2026

Mon, 02/16/2026 - 05:15

GoDaddy's website builder offers a clean interface, making it incredibly fast to build a website. It took me just 52 minutes to go from a blank canvas to a professional-looking website, making it perfect for small business owners who need a website, like yesterday.

However, its convenience comes at a cost. Its restrictions on creativity can be a blessing or a curse, depending on what you want — you get a polished website with zero fuss, but if you want pixel-perfect control, you'll be left frustrated.

We've spent hundreds of hours testing over 80 of the best website builder platforms on the market, giving us deep insight into what works for different users. For this GoDaddy Website Builder review, I created multiple test sites to evaluate its features, tools, ease of use, and value proposition.

Below you will find everything you need to know to make an informed decision if GoDaddy is the right website builder for you.

GoDaddy website builder pricing and plans

Pricing feels competitive for what you get. For me, GoDaddy hits a sweet spot between budget and business-focused features. All paid plans include hosting and SSL certificates, which eliminates the hidden costs that could turn away new entrepreneurs.

Plan

Starting rate /mo (paid monthly)

Starting rate /mo (paid annually)

Renewal rate /mo (paid annually)

Basic

$21.99

$9.99

$16.99

Premium

$39.99

$14.99

$29.99

Commerce

$44.99

$20.99

$34.99

Pricing last verified: 16/02/2026

GoDaddy website builder plans: Explained

Best for personal websites
Starting at: $9.99/mo

With the Basic plan you'll get unlimited storage and pages, but you're missing critical features like SEO tools and the ability to remove GoDaddy branding.

It's adequate for simple personal sites or testing the waters.View Deal

Best for small businesses
Starting at: $14.99/mo

Premium unlocks the real power. You get SEO tools, social media integration, and email marketing capabilities. I found this tier offers the strongest feature-to-price ratio for serious small business owners, but lacks the features needed for serious online stores.View Deal

Best for online stores
Starting at: $20.99/mo

This unlocks full ecommerce functionality—payment processing, up to 5,000 product listings, inventory management, and abandoned cart recovery.

If you're selling products, this is your only option.View Deal

Reviewer's experience: Getting started

Although most of the top website builders pride themselves on ease of use, GoDaddy is by far one of the easiest platforms to get going with.

Step 1: Signing up

Signing up for GoDaddy's website builder is simple, with three popular login options to pick from. (Image credit: GoDaddy)

You can sign up for GoDaddy using your email, Facebook, or Google account.

Step 2: Define your goals

Picking your goal will help GoDaddy tailor your website building experience. (Image credit: GoDaddy)

After I had signed up I was immediately asked about my business type and goals. GoDaddy's AI then generated a partially completed website within minutes. This eliminated the intimidating blank canvas that usually stares you down with other builders.

Onboarding felt refreshingly quick. No complex menus to navigate. GoDaddy presented me with a functional site structure based on my answers, complete with suggested layouts and placeholder content. It cut down on decision fatigue right from the start.

Step 3: Edit your site

GoDaddy's website editor is minimalist and intuitive. (Image credit: GoDaddy)

Navigating the editor felt intuitive. I worked with the section-based system, which lets you add, remove, or reorder entire content blocks. It's easy, but restrictive. The controls were clearly labeled and I never felt lost, although I was quickly frustrated by the lack of an undo button.

Customizing my test site involved choosing from pre-designed sections. I could toggle elements on or off, but couldn't break free from the preset structures.

Want to move a button somewhere specific? Too bad. This "guided freedom" approach works well for beginners but felt problematic when I wanted more control.

GoDaddy website builder's business tools

GoDaddy's website builder offers the following business tools:

Full ecommerce functionality
Online appointment scheduling
Payment processing with GoDaddy Payments
Inventory management across channels
AI-powered conversations inbox
Client management tools

GoDaddy packs in practical features for running a business. I found the ecommerce and appointment booking particularly useful. Some tools felt basic, but they covered the essentials well enough.

Read more about GoDaddy's business tools ▼

Ecommerce functionality

Adding products, downloads, and services to your website is simple (Image credit: GoDaddy)

I set up a test store on the Commerce plan in about 15 minutes. You can list up to 5,000 products, which is more than most small businesses need. The platform lets you sell physical products, digital goods, and services all from one dashboard.

Payment processing with GoDaddy Payments

GoDaddy offers plenty of payment options, making it easy for customers to buy from you. (Image credit: GoDaddy)

GoDaddy Payments is integrated directly into the platform. The transaction fee is 2.7% + 30¢ per transaction, which beats many of the best ecommerce platforms. Payouts arrive as soon as the next business day, and all transactions appear in one unified dashboard.

I found the setup process quite simple. You can also choose alternative processors like Square, Stripe, or PayPal if you prefer. However, other users have warned about poor support experiences with GoDaddy Payments.

Inventory management

GoDaddy makes it easy for small businesses to sell online. (Image credit: GoDaddy)

The inventory syncing impressed me. When you sell a product on your website, the stock levels automatically update on Amazon, eBay, and Etsy. This prevents overselling, a common nightmare for multi-channel sellers.

Managing everything from one dashboard saved considerable time during testing. The system tracks online orders and inventory levels in real time. But I noticed the marketplace integrations are only available in select regions, so verify availability for your market.

Online appointment scheduling

GoDaddy's appointment scheduling tool is ideal for service based businesses that want to take bookings online. (Image credit: GoDaddy)

Clients can schedule appointments 24/7 directly through your site, while the system sends automatic reminders via email and text.

I tested the calendar syncing feature, which keeps your business calendar aligned with your website calendar in real time. You can also accept deposits when customers book services.

AI conversations inbox

GoDaddy's conversations tool makes it easy for small businesses to monitor and manage all communications in one space. (Image credit: GoDaddy)

Conversations act as your all-in-one business inbox. It includes an optional second phone line, so customers can call without using your personal number. AI chatbots handle initial customer inquiries automatically, giving quick responses that stay on-brand.

I tested the unified inbox feature. It consolidates messages from multiple channels into one app. You'll never miss a potential sale because calls go to voicemail with your custom greeting. The AI reply suggestions work well for common questions, though you'll need to intervene for complex inquiries.

Client management tools

GoDaddy's built in CRM not only helps small businesses build better relationships with customers, but also integrates seamlessly with their website, saving them significant time. (Image credit: GoDaddy)

The built-in CRM stores contact information, appointment history, and payment records. This makes customer interactions smoother and more personalized. I used it to upload test clients and found the interface straightforward.

You can view customer purchase patterns and use that data for targeted email promotions. But the CRM functionality is quite basic, don't expect advanced features like sales pipeline management or detailed reporting.

GoDaddy website builder's marketing tools

GoDaddy offers the following marketing tools:

SEO optimization wizard
Email marketing campaigns
Social media scheduling and management
GoDaddy Studio content creator
Digital ads on Meta and Google
Social commerce integrations
Website analytics
Marketing planner with AI

GoDaddy's marketing suite is quite expansive for a basic website builder. It bundles email, social media, paid ads, and SEO tools into one dashboard. Again, some features felt limited compared to standalone marketing platforms, but the integrations usually made up for it.

Read more about GoDaddy's marketing tools ▼

SEO optimization wizard

GoDaddy's SEO tools can help you increase your businesses visibility in search engine results pages. (Image credit: GoDaddy)

The SEO Wizard walks you through optimizing each page step-by-step. It suggests relevant keywords and helps you write meta descriptions, headings, or alt text.

I didn't need to waste any time figuring out what to optimize. You can even connect Google Analytics and Search Console for deeper tracking. However, the SEO tools are only available on Premium and Commerce plans.

Email marketing

Email marketing features can help you drive traffic and profits. (Image credit: GoDaddy)

Email marketing is included in all paid plans, with different subscriber limits. Basic lets you email 100 contacts monthly, Premium bumps that to 25,000, and Commerce allows 100,000. GoDaddy's AI uses your website design to create branded email templates automatically.

Creating a test campaign took about 10 minutes from start to send. One limitation: you can't create advanced automation sequences like abandoned cart emails or behavior-triggered campaigns. The email builder also felt restrictive, I found that I couldn't customize layouts beyond the preset templates.

Social media management

Managing your social media accounts from one central dashboard can save time and help improve consistent publishing. (Image credit: GoDaddy)

You can schedule and publish posts to publish on multiple social networks from the dashboard. GoDaddy supports Facebook, Instagram, X (Twitter), and more.

I tested scheduling content across three platforms simultaneously, which worked without issue.

GoDaddy Studio content creator

Although it doesn't offer the feature set of dedicated platforms like Canva, GoDaddy's Studio platform can be a simple way to create quick, high impact designs. (Image credit: GoDaddy)

Studio provides professional templates for creating branded visuals. I used it to design some basic social media graphics and promo images. Their customizable templates saved time — without compromising brand authenticity.

You can create content for your website, social media channels, and advertising campaigns all in one place. I really liked how it suggested image layouts based on the content type.

However, serious graphic designers will find the customization options limiting. Think Canva Lite rather than Photoshop.

Ads on Meta and Google

Running digital ads can get you near immediate traffic, making it ideal for small businesses that want quick results. (Image credit: GoDaddy)

Premium and Commerce plans let you create, schedule, and manage unlimited digital ads. The interface simplifies the typically complex process of running paid campaigns. You can set up a test Facebook ad in under five minutes.

Social commerce integrations

Social commerce integration helps reduce friction by letting customers buy from you directly through social media platforms. (Image credit: GoDaddy)

GoDaddy connects your online store to Facebook Marketplace, Instagram Creator, Amazon, eBay, and Etsy. Inventory syncs happen automatically. When someone buys on Amazon, your website stock updates instantly.

You can also list products for free on Google Shopping. But keep in mind that marketplace integrations are only available in select regions. Check whether your location has access before planning a multi-channel strategy. My setup process varied by marketplace, some connected instantly, others required additional verification steps.

Web analytics

Analytics give excellent insight into what is and isn't working for your business. (Image credit: GoDaddy)

GoDaddy InSight Score gives you performance benchmarks against similar businesses.

The analytics dashboard shows SEO performance, website traffic, and campaign results all in one place. I found the consolidated view well-designed for quick decision-making.

AI marketing planner

Staying on top of marketing activities can be tricky for resource-strapped small businesses. GoDaddy helps with an AI tool for planning your marketing activities. (Image credit: GoDaddy)

The AI-powered marketing planner creates custom action plans. It analyzes your business and suggests what to work on next. It's helpful for beginners when deciding where to focus efforts.

The planner draws from data across millions of GoDaddy customers to make industry-specific recommendations. You get step-by-step guidance rather than vague suggestions. However, the recommendations still felt generic. Advanced marketers will likely ignore most suggestions.

Reviewer's experience: Support

GoDaddy offers comprehensive support, although I found it a little slow to get to an eventual solution. (Image credit: GoDaddy)

GoDaddy offers 24/7 support through live chat and phone, plus a comprehensive help center. On paper, the coverage looks solid. You can reach a human agent anytime, which beats many competitors.

I tested the live chat with a technical question about domain mapping. The initial bot interaction lasted about a minute before connecting me to an agent. The representative was friendly but couldn't fully answer my question without escalating to someone else. The back-and-forth messaging took longer than expected, I waited several minutes between responses.

User sentiment varies significantly across review platforms. GoDaddy maintains a 4.5/5 rating on Trustpilot, with customers praising phone support and quick onboarding. However, G2 and Reddit paint a slightly different picture. Common complaints include contradictory answers, aggressive upselling, and poor technical support for complex issues. Reddit threads specifically warn against using GoDaddy Payments due to unresolved support problems.

Test results: GoDaddy website builder

Attribute

Notes

Rating

Value for money

Competitive pricing with bundled features. Premium plan offers the best bang for your buck.

★★★★☆

Ease of use

Fastest setup I've experienced. Intuitive section-based editor makes building effortless.

★★★★★

Design

Limited customization and generic templates. You sacrifice creative control for speed.

★★★☆☆

Business tools

Solid ecommerce and appointment booking. CRM feels basic but covers essentials.

★★★★☆

Marketing tools

Strong integrated suite with SEO, email, and social tools. Lacks advanced features.

★★★☆☆

Support

24/7 availability with mixed results. Great for basic questions, struggles with technical issues.

★★★☆☆

Competitor comparison

Below we show you how GoDaddy stacks up against two of its closest competitors:

Platform

Best for

Our overall rating

Free plan

Paid plans start at

Ease of use

Support

GoDaddy Website Builder

Speed and simplicity

★★★½☆

Yes

$9.99/month

★★★★★

Live chat, phone (24/7)

Squarespace

Design-focused creatives

★★★★☆

Trial only

$16.00/month

★★★★☆

Email, community forum, expert hire

Wix

Maximum flexibility

★★★★½

Yes

$17.00/month

★★★★☆

Live chat, phone (fee-based), community forum

How we tested the GoDaddy website builder

At TechRadar Pro, we rigorously test website builders over several days. I spent considerable time with GoDaddy Website Builder for this review, creating test sites to evaluate each feature and performance metric.

Everything gets scrutinized, from the first login experience to advanced features like ecommerce and SEO.

You can read our full guide to how we test website builders to learn more.

GoDaddy website builder review: FAQsIs GoDaddy Website Builder really free?

GoDaddy offers a limited free plan with basic features and GoDaddy branding. You get one page, limited storage, and no custom domain. For serious business use, you'll need a paid plan starting at $10.99/month. All paid plans include hosting and SSL certificates.

Can I switch from GoDaddy to another platform later?

Unfortunately, migrating away from GoDaddy Website Builder is difficult. The platform doesn't allow you to export your site or move content easily to another builder. You'll essentially need to rebuild from scratch on a new platform, which is a major consideration before committing.

Does GoDaddy Website Builder work for ecommerce?

Yes, but only on the Commerce plan ($23.99/month annually). You can list up to 5,000 products and accept payments through multiple processors. The platform includes inventory management, abandoned cart recovery, and marketplace integrations. However, customization options remain limited compared to dedicated ecommerce platforms.

How long does it take to build a website with GoDaddy?

You can launch a functional site in under an hour. The AI builder creates a partially completed website in minutes based on your answers to setup questions. From there, you customize sections, add content, and publish. More complex sites with ecommerce will take longer.

Categories: Reviews

I tested the Miofive Mirror 1 for a month – it’s the 4K dash cam could replace your rearview mirror (if it fits)

Sun, 02/15/2026 - 19:00

Miofive Mirror 1: two-minute review

While I’ve tried plenty of the best dash cams on the market, I’ve spent less time using one of the alternatives – a mirror dash cam, such as the Miofive Mirror 1 Dash Cam. It's a chunky hunk of kit, being designed to fit over a standard issue rear view mirror, using one of three different mounting options. It can be strapped, stuck or screwed on, but no matter which option is employed, the result is the same – this is a large gadget.

The Miofive Mirror 1 Dash Cam differs from traditional offerings in the design department, but it’s actually a refreshing variation on the theme. This gadget delivers the same functionality found on a traditional dash cam but everything is presented slightly differently.

Adding to the appeal is the way it can be an electronic rear-view mirror as well as offering a view out of the front too, or indeed, a split combination of the two. Both views also get recorded in a continuous loop process, much like a typical dash cam.

The Miofive Mirror 1 comes with an impressive specification, and sizable price tag. There are twin Sony sensors for the cameras; a 4K (3840 × 2160 30fps) IMX415 Starvis 2 for the front and a 2K (2560 × 1440 30fps) IMX675 for the rear unit, capable of capturing crips footage for regular day time driving as well as after dark scenarios – these sensors have proven performance characteristics. What they see is also presented on the mirror screen, which is an expansive 11.26-inch modestly curved display that features anti-glare capabilities.

(Image credit: Future)

As a premium device, the Miofive Mirror 1 also boasts excellent connectivity features, including 5GHz Wi-Fi and Bluetooth 4.2, which means moving those high-resolution files is quick and easy – Miofive says up to 7MB per second, while data itself can be managed by an accompanying no frills Miofive app.

The Miofive Mirror 1 dash cam also packs sophisticated and in vogue AI-driven driver assistance features and functions, which are all easily accessed via the touchscreen. These include warnings for abrupt acceleration or braking, lane departure and ‘Stop and Go’ traffic movement.

Along with those bang-up-to-date features, the Miofive Mirror 1 comes with everything needed to keep it running. There’s a super capacitor-based power supply plus the unit can be powered off a 12V socket or, if preferred, hardwired to exploit its functionality more comprehensively. Hardwire features include the 24-hour parking monitor aspect.

Miofive also packs a 128GB microSD card into the mirror’s media slot so, aside from some wiring chores initially, the unit is pretty much ready to go.

Miofive Mirror 1: price and availability

The Miofive Mirror 1 Dash Camera currently costs $299.99 on Amazon in the US. Meanwhile, the Miofive Mirror 1 Dash Camera is also available to buy from Amazon UK for £259.99, at the time of writing. Normally, the regular UK list price is £299.99, which is comparable to other likeminded mirror dash cam models with similar specs. Cheaper mirror dash cam alternatives can be found too, but I think the quality of construction makes the Miofive Mirror 1 Dash Cam seem like decent value.

Miofive Mirror 1: specsMiofive Mirror specs

Video

Front: 4K UHD (3840×2160p) @30 fps
Rear: 2K QHD (2560×1440p) @30 fps

Field of view (FOV)

140 degrees front / 140 degrees rear

Storage

MicroSD up to 512GB

GPS

Yes

Parking mode

Yes, with constant power cable, not included

App support

Miofive app

Dimensions

‎31 x 7 x 2 cm / 12.2 x 2.76 x 0.79 inches

Weight

1.01 lbs / 498g

Battery

Miofive Mirror 1: Design

While the ample screen real estate offered by the Miofive Mirror 1 Dash Cam, which has overall dimensions of 2.2 x 2.76 x 0.79 inches / 31 x 7 x 2 cm, is impressive, its size should be kept in mind by anyone with a smaller windscreen. In a compact or small sports car, the 11.26-inch IPS touchscreen might feel a little bit too obtrusive. Even in a larger vehicle, such as an SUV, the mirror construction is bulky. However, it looks and feels nicely designed and reasonably durable.

The same can be said for all of the various accessories and ancillary components needed to get the Miofive Mirror 1 Dash Cam installed and operating. Miofive offers three different ways to mount the mirror unit, which is essentially stuck in place over an existing rear-view mirror. I chose the rubberised strap method which worked well, didn’t vibrate or move on the go and was temporary enough to let the unit be removed from my test vehicle.

(Image credit: Future)

A more permanent option is using the supplied screws to fasten it in place, while bonding is another long-term method. I suggest using the rubberised strap method initially, just in case the Miofive Mirror 1 Dash Cam isn’t quite the right fit for your needs. The box contains all the other wiring and connectors needed to hook up to the power, including a 12V plug for that port and colour coded harnessing for connecting peripherals.

The peripherals include a small rear-view camera, which can be stuck in place using a sticky pad on the camera's base and subsequently angled for optimal capture. The other accessory that requires connection to the crop of wires is the GPS unit. Everything is basically finished in grey or black plastic, while most of the cabling is black too. This can be fed behind trim using the usual method just like any other dash cam. There’s just a little more to hide away.

(Image credit: Future)Miofive Mirror 1: Performance

Once I had all of the wiring plumbed in, the Miofive Mirror 1 Dash Cam was actually very simple and straightforward to set up. The media card was already in the slot, and I followed best practice and formatted the card following initial power up. From there, the mirrored screen area displayed an array of small icons, plus a split view. To the left was a view of the read ahead and to the right, a view to the rear of the car. I left it in this default mode for testing purposes although views can be tweaked to suit individual preferences.

The picture quality looks less good in my photos but, in reality, the quality of the lenses was easy to see with clear and sharp images from each angle even in decidedly gloomy conditions. Miofive has done a decent job of including a solid level of control options, via screen icons when the cameras are on. This meant it was easy to tap and change anything, such as brightness, before setting off.

(Image credit: Future)

Dipping into the other features and functions – which include Connect Your Phone, Recording Settings, Parking Guard, AI, System Settings, About and Speed Cam Alert –required more thought, but the large color icons worked well. The AI menu option brings up five different functions that can be enabled and set for intensity, like Reverse Assist Line, for example, which is set as Medium by default. These are okay, although I didn’t feel a desperate urge to use them. In fact, Driver Assistance, as one option, is better off disabled as far as I’m concerned.

Overall, the footage recorded by the Miofive Mirror 1 Dash Cam is largely excellent. It's crisp and clear, capturing details nicely enough, and didn’t leave me wanting anything better. The detail presented along the bottom of the footage, including date, time and speed is also perfectly acceptable. Used as a pure front and rear dash cam setup, this is a very good product. And, should you require them, there are plenty of neat tools to enhance the functionality.

(Image credit: Future)

One important thing to note is anyone wanting to enjoy the parking monitoring will need to do so by enlisting the services of an optional hardwire kit. This does increase the potential of the bundle, especially for anyone wanting the extra parking features that get unlocked by going down the hardwire route.

Should you buy the Miofive Mirror 1?

(Image credit: Future)Buy it if...

You like the idea of a mirror cam
The Miofive Mirror 1 is a variation on the dash cam theme, but also doubles as an electronic rear-view mirror. However, it might not appeal to everyone, especially those who wear glasses.

You like a complete package
Hardwire kit aside, a real bonus with the Miofive Mirror 1 is the way it has everything in the box to get started, along with a 128GB microSD card.

You want comprehensive coverage
The Miofive Mirror 1 offers both front and rear video surveillance on the move via twin cameras. Both work well and make this unit ideal for anyone needing more substantial coverage.

Don't buy it if...

Conventional dash cams appeal
The Mirofive Mirror 1 is an electronic rear-view mirror that also captures video. The fitting and functionality is therefore more advanced, so it might be a turn-off for anyone requiring a cheap, basic dash cam.

Hard wiring is unappealing
To unlock the Miofive Mirror 1's extra features, the unit requires an extra hardwire kit to be used. This can be fiddly and is also more permanent, so it's less ideal if you need to move the mirror from time to time.

Multiple views are unnecessary
While the Miofive Mirror 1 offers excellent front and fear views within the screen area, and captures said views as well, it might be a little over the top for anyone who just needs a basic 'out front' dash cam perspective.

How I tested the Miofive Mirror 1

I installed the dash cam in a car for an initial period of three to four weeks
I used it for various day and night journeys in all types of weather
I connected it to my phone, downloading recordings to check on quality

I tested the Miofive Mirror 1 dash cam across a period of several weeks. This involved using it in a test vehicle and during a variety of weather conditions. This allowed me to try all of the features and functions, aside from the hardwire options due to it being powered via a 12V power port in a vehicle that was on temporary loan.

On top of that, I downloaded the latest Miofive app, which was installed on an iPhone 17 and used during the installation process and also for file management duties. I also tested the Wi-Fi connectivity between the main camera unit and the app, which based on the size of the 4K video files was a big part of the overall testing procedure and everything worked as anticipated.

First reviewed February 2026

Categories: Reviews

Sick of charging your Apple Watch every day? The Coros Pace 4 offers up to 19 days of battery, and costs less than an SE 3

Sun, 02/15/2026 - 07:00

Coros Pace 4: One minute review

The Coros Pace 4 continues its predecessor’s mantle as one of the best cheap running watches and is a marked improvement upon the previous-gen Coros Pace 3, which was also one of our best running watches overall. There's a lot to like about the smartwatch, including runners wanting to make an upgrade.

The most significant change between the two models is the movement away from a fairly basic Memory-in-Pixel screen to a vibrant 1.2-inch AMOLED touchscreen. The resolution has also been increased from 240x240 pixels to 390x390 pixels. This makes the text and graphs substantially sharper, and despite this having an impact upon battery drain, Coros has directly addressed that by increasing the battery capacity.

The watch is aimed at runners, triathletes, and cyclists desiring speed and simplicity. At just 32g (with nylon strap), the Pace 4 is incredibly lightweight and unassuming. The tracking of accurate distances was not pinpoint-sharp, but pace, heart rate, cadence, and other metrics were measured accurately.

That said, this is not a smartwatch for the masses. The lack of everyday smarts, such as music streaming and NFC payments, makes it rather limited for anyone looking for more than a training tool. I wouldn't say this is a negative, though, as not every wearable is for everyone. The Pace 4 sticks close to its running credentials, and at a budget-friendly price of $249 / £229, this makes it a very enticing proposition indeed.

Coros Pace 4: Specifications

Component

Coros Pace 4

Price

$249 USD / £229 UK / $479.95 AUS

Dimensions

43.4 x 43.4 x 11.8 mm

Weight

32g (with Nylon band) / 40g (with Silicone band)

Caze/bezel

Fiber-reinforced polymer (Plastic)

Display

1.2-inch AMOLED touchscreen 390 x 390 pixels

GPS

Dual-Frequency GNSS

Battery life

Up to 19 days or 41 hours for High GPS Usage

Connection

Bluetooth and Wi-Fi

Water resistance

5 ATM

(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)Coros Pace 4: Price and availability

$249 USD / £229 UK / AU$479.95
A fantastic price for a smartwatch with dual-band GPS and an AMOLED display
Competes well with the Garmin Forerunner 165

The COROS Pace 4, priced at $249 / £229 / AU$479.95, is a lightweight performance running watch that balances high-end features like a vibrant AMOLED display and industry-leading battery life (up to 41 hours of GPS) with a competitive entry-level price tag. The 4.5-star-rated Apple Watch SE 3 is comparably priced, although more targeted at general users rather than runners.

Similarly specced alternatives include the Garmin Forerunner 165 and Suunto Run or if you're looking for a more rugged, outdoor-focused build, then the Amazfit T-Rex 3 Pro is a good alternative.

Value score 4.5/5

Coros Pace 4: Design

Lightweight build feels basic but comfortable to wear
Bright, high-resolution AMOLED display
Hybrid three-button system

The Coros Pace 4 is small, lightweight, and has a distinctly budget plastic feel. No-one would describe the watch as premium, but that doesn’t mean the choice of materials doesn’t have any benefits. At 32g (with nylon band), it’s beautifully light on the wrist, and a thickness of 11.8mm means it easily slips underneath the sleeve.

At the heart of the Pace 4 is a small 1.2-inch AMOLED screen that is comparable with the Garmin Forerunner 265 and Apple Watch SE 3. With a 1,500-nit brightness and a 390 x 390px resolution, the Pace 4 lacks nothing in outdoor visibility and image sharpness. To keep the device charged, Coros provides a proprietary charger which magnetically attaches to the watch. The charger also contains a built-in keyring, which reduces the chance of losing it.

Future / Paul HattonFuture / Paul HattonFuture / Paul HattonFuture / Paul HattonFuture / Paul HattonFuture / Paul HattonFuture / Paul Hatton

While Garmin sticks to a traditional five-button layout and Apple relies on a single digital crown and side button, the Pace 4 uses a hybrid three-button system. This includes the signature Coros digital dial plus an Action button, similar to the Apple Watch Ultra 3. These deliver reliable navigation through menus even when your hands are sweaty or you're wearing winter gloves.

At the back of the watch, you'll find a flush-mounted sensor that is flat enough to avoid skin irritation during long periods of wear. I also found it more stable than a lot of smartwatches that I've tested recently. Additionally, its integrated dual-microphone system is a rare design find in this price bracket.

Design Score: 4/5

Coros Pace 4: Features

19 days of daily training and sleep
An innovative voice recording tool
Built-in GPS

The Coros Pace 4 boasts a voice recording tool, excellent battery life, and a dual-frequency GPS system. Beginning with the voice functionality, it's fair to say that most other smartwatches provide a general-purpose voice memo tool, but the Pace 4 is unique in that its voice features are specifically integrated into the athletic training workflow. More specifically, Voice Pins can be added mid-run to specific locations on your route, while Voice Notes are better suited to capturing subjective information after an activity has been completed.

As you’d expect with a running watch, the Pace 4 utilizes an advanced All-Systems dual-frequency GNSS chipset, allowing it to communicate with five major satellite networks (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, Beidou, and QZSS). The ability to connect across two frequencies is designed to improve positional accuracy in challenging environments such as cities and forests.

(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)

The lack of full offline maps is a little disappointing, although breadcrumb-style navigation with turn-by-turn directions for the planned route is available. Another notable feature is its ability to route sync from platforms like Strava.

And finally, battery capabilities. The Pace 4 continues a growing trend of offering long-lasting performance. In terms of advertised numbers, that looks like 19 days of continuous daily use and 41 hours when using the All Systems (High) GPS mode. This is roughly equivalent to the latest Amazfit Balance 2, which features 21 days of continuous daily use and 33 hours of GPS use.

Features Score: 4/5

Coros Pace 4: Performance

Fast and responsive interface
Accurate health tracking
Reasonable GPS performance for a budget-smartwatch

The Coros Pace 4 features an Ambiq Apollo 510 processor, which, compared to its predecessors, is a significant leap in internal processing power and efficiency. This results in a responsive interface that shows no sign of lag when carrying out health measurements or activity tracking. The interface is basic but simple to navigate, with Coros opting to display all non-activity features inside a 'Control Center' interface that displays everything inside one single face of the watch rather than cycling up and down long lists, as is more common with other watch brands.

The advanced processor also powers voice pins and training logs, which form a key part of the Coros Pace experience. Recording these audio notes is simple and quick and a far better solution than using a separate app or paper-based alternative. A next-step improvement would be to introduce an AI feature that is able to transcribe these notes and summarize progress.

In terms of positional precision, the Pace 4 utilizes an all-satellite, dual-frequency GNSS chipset that has been refined to maintain a lock in difficult environments. I had no problems finding a strong enough signal, even in rural areas and when surrounded by tall buildings.

In distance traveled benchmark tests against the extensively tested Huawei Watch Ultimate 2, I found the Pace 4 to be within 200 meters, not super-accurate but good enough for casual runners. We'll be batch-testing the Coros Pace 4, along with other watches, to better assess accuracy over longer distances in the near future – watch this space. However, it's safe to say the Pace 4 offers a good GPS distance estimation, with a margin for error.

(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)

Biometric tracking has also seen a hardware overhaul with a redesigned optical heart rate sensor featuring five LEDs and four photodetectors. This updated array provides reliable health data when compared to the Watch Ultimate 2. That said, I did have to make sure that the watch maintained a snug fit to my skin; otherwise, light leaking onto the sensor caused measurements to jump around.

Despite the move to a 1,500-nit AMOLED screen, the battery efficiency remains a standout, providing up to 41 hours in High GPS mode and 31 hours in Dual-Frequency mode. While using the device to track a few runs and bike rides per week, I was easily able to achieve between ten and fourteen days of usage. The 5 ATM water resistance rating held up when using the watch in wet conditions as well as when submerged in a bowl of water for over a minute.

The Pace 4 is a perfect weight and size for runners and athletes who want their smartwatch to blend into the background. It'll track your vitals and activities to a reasonable accuracy, especially given the price point.

Performance score: 4/5

(Image credit: Future / Paul Hatton)Coros Pace 4: Scorecard

The Mortuary Assistant is my top Shudder recommendation in February - here's why I liked it so much

Sun, 02/15/2026 - 06:00

The Mortuary Assistant is now streaming on Shudder and playing in select movie theaters, and you may have already seen a few bad reviews for it. But I had a great time with this adaptation.

It can certainly be daunting when you're adapting a beloved video game for the screen. Markiplier's Iron Lung performed very well at the box office lately, even if it was met with poor critic reviews overall. But the audience turnout proves people are interested in game adaptations in general, which is good news since they keep coming, and Exit 8 will soon be following in its footsteps.

When it comes to The Mortuary Assistant, I think it's best to go into it not expecting an exact replica of the video game. Approaches like that worked for The Last of Us, but here, I actually liked the fact that it doesn't follow the game to the letter. It's very much an adaptation and companion piece to the game, which I highly recommend you play.

Director Jeremiah Kipp told me that The Mortuary Assistant's game developer was ‘enormously supportive’ of the movie, and it certainly shows. While the movie does deviate from the game slightly, the location, vibe, and the character of Rebecca are portrayed incredibly well indeed.

We learn a lot more about Rebecca's character here as she spends a night shift at River Fields Mortuary. It's clear she is devoted to her job and neglects other areas of her life, especially when it comes to the demons of her past. Willa Holland gives a great performance here as someone who seems to be more comfortable with the dead than the living, as she continues to ignore and stuff down the things that have happened to her.

The Mimic is one of the most iconic creatures in The Mortuary Assistant. (Image credit: Dread XP)

Unfortunately, this leads Rebecca to be haunted by an actual demon, which does a very good job at tormenting her. Fan favorite manifestation The Mimic, steals the show here, as it appears to terrorize Rebecca during her terrifying shift. The creature design really is good here, and we're left wondering what is real and what is not, bringing us up close and personal to Rebecca's terror and hallucinations.

Rebecca is finishing her apprenticeship with mortician Raymond Delver (Paul Sparks), and these are the two characters we follow throughout the movie. He is ultimately in charge of finding employees he believes capable of combating the demons located there, and Rebecca is his latest colleague to be met with the horrors.

I do think audiences would benefit from playing the video game too, as it can provide more context. I'm not sure if those who know nothing about the game would get quite as huge a kick out of this, as part of what made this exciting for me was already being a huge fan of the game.

Like many horror movies, there is unfortunately an over-reliance on jump scares at times, and this is a point that is sure to divide audiences. Whether you love them or hate them, you can be the judge of how effective they are.

All in all, this is a strong adaptation, and there's lots for fans of the game to enjoy, especially if you're keen to expand on the lore and backstory. Don't go into this expecting a shot-for-shot remake of the game, and instead, it should be treated as a very worthy expansion.

If you're looking for a great supernatural horror with plenty of scares, and a deeper exploration about character's traumas, this is definitely the movie for you. Director Jeremiah Kipp revealed that "a filmmaker needs a deep personal connection to the material", and you can definitely feel that here.

Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button!

And of course, you can also follow TechRadar on YouTube and TikTok for news, reviews, unboxings in video form, and get regular updates from us on WhatsApp too.

Categories: Reviews

I reviewed the Eversolo DAC-Z10, and this DAC/preamp/headphone amp combo reveals details you didn't know were in your music

Sun, 02/15/2026 - 05:00

Eversolo DAC-Z10: one-minute review

Never let it be said that Eversolo is not ever so serious. The Eversolo DAC-Z10 is an extremely well-specified digital-to-analogue converter, headphone amplifier and system preamplifier in a single package – and while it sells for a significant sum, even compared to the best DACs around, it turns out to represent unarguable value for money.

As well as the full-on specification (which includes four AKM DAC chips, twin RSR ‘ladder’ volume control modules, and no fewer than three independent and heavily shielded linear power supplies), the user interface (via a big touch-screen) is excellent even before you realize it offers a choice of virtual VU meters and dynamic spectrum displays.

There are more than enough digital inputs, plus balanced and unbalanced analog outputs, and an extremely capable discrete headphone amplification module.

And it all works very well indeed. The DAC-Z10 is almost fanatical when it comes to detail retrieval, really holds its own where rhythmic expression, soundstaging and dynamic impetus are concerned, and maintains the tonal balance of the music as originally recorded as much as possible.

In fact, about its biggest shortcoming is how overtly intolerant it is of inferior partners – don’t imagine the DAC-Z10 is about to make a silk purse out of the sow’s ear that is sub-par electronics or loudspeakers. But that's not a real flaw for something that costs this much anyway – you'd expect an expensive DAC to sing with expensive other components, wouldn't you?

(Image credit: Simon Lucas)Eversolo DAC-Z10 review: Price & release date

The Eversolo DAC-Z10 launched during November 2025 and in the United Kingdom it sells for a strangely specific £1,939. In the United States it’s $1,980, while in Australia the going rate is AU$3,339 or thereabouts.

This puts it in line with options from the likes of Denon and NAD – big names in the hi-fi separates space.

(Image credit: Simon Lucas)Eversolo DAC-Z10 review: Features

Numerous digital and analog inputs
Independent left and right channel AKM digital-to-analog conversion modules
Three independent power supplies

Even by Eversolo’s established standards, the DAC-Z10 is extensively specified – ‘lavishly’ may not be too strong a word. It’s difficult to know where to start, really. Maybe on the outside would be best…

At the rear of the DAC-Z10, there are numerous digital and analogue inputs, alongside balanced XLR and unbalanced RCA analogue outputs for connection to a power amplifier, powered speakers or what-have-you. There’s also a grounding post for channeling even the most minor electrical interference out of harm’s way.

The digital stuff consists of an IIS (aka I2S) input (featuring eight switchable modes, naturally, and capable of dealing with digital audio resolutions of up to 32bit/768kHz PCM and DSD512), HDMI eARC, USB-B (with multi-core audio processor and again supporting 32bit/768kHz PCM and DSD512), a fully isolated AES/EBU input, and a pair of coaxial and a pair of optical audio inputs (all of which support 24bit/192kHz PCM and DSD64). There’s also wireless connectivity via Bluetooth 5.0, with SBC and AAC codec compatibility.

There’s a further analog output on the fascia: a 6.3mm single-ended headphone socket. It’s powered by a dedicated amplification module, and automatically detects the impedance of the headphones it’s driving and adjusts gain accordingly.

The internal layout of the Eversolo is no less thorough. Built on the company’s ‘Fully Isolated Architecture’ platform, which isolates the digital and analog domains in a drive for optimal signal purity, the DAC-Z10 features three linear power supplies. One is for the left channel, one for the right, and one for system circuitry – each is isolated from the others in an effort to minimi`e interference.

The DAC-Z10 is big on the concept of independent left and right stereo channels elsewhere, too. For instance, each stereo channel has a dedicated pair of AKM DAC chips – an AK4191 and an AK4499 – so left and right digital signals are kept completely separate from input to conversion.

Volume control uses an independent R2R ‘ladder’ module for each channel, so signal integrity and phase alignment should be uncorrupted, even if the selected volume level is very low or very high.

The Eversolo ‘Precision Core’, which features a temperature-controlled crystal oscillator, phase-locked loop technology and FPGA clock reconstruction, makes up the DAC-Z10 clock system. Despite the extremely thorough attention it has paid to this critical componentry, though, the Eversolo also has an input for an external clock – and with multiple impedance options.

This allows the DAC-Z10 to integrate into super-high end systems that have even more effective clock systems than the one specified here. Either way, though, the DAC-Z10 seems extremely well-served where clocking, and by extension the imaging and transient response of its sound, are concerned.

Features score: 5 / 5

(Image credit: Simon Lucas)Eversolo DAC-Z10 review: Sound quality

Profoundly impressive detail retrieval
Expansive, organized and front-foot sound
Not especially tolerant of less-capable partners

Let’s get the minor negative out of the way first, shall we? The Eversolo DAC-Z10 is not about to indulge in partnering equipment that is less capable than it is. The DAC-Z10 punches above its weight, not below it – so it can hold its own in systems with high price-tags, but it’s not about to make your run-of-the-mill power speakers or wallet-friendly amps into world-beaters. If anything, it’s more likely to expose their shortcomings.

But as long as the stuff before and after the Eversolo in the chain is up to scratch, there’s a whole lot to enjoy about this device – especially where its powers of digital-to-analog conversion are concerned.

Where detail retrieval is concerned, the DAC-Z10 is as good as anything I've heard at anything like the price. No event in a recording is too minor, no harmonic variation is too subtle, no over- or undertone surrounding the fundamental note of an instrument or a voice is too muted to elude it.

The production of Horsegirl’s Phonetics On and On is open and so spare that you might think every shred of information is available even when it’s playing on an unremarkable system – but the Eversolo demonstrates that even deeper subtleties and transients are there, and it has the power to reveal and contextualize them. If you’re after the most complete image possible of your music, the DAC-Z10 is ready and able to give it to you.

It’s more than willing to get out of the way of the music, and of the source machine that’s playing it. So when it comes to tonality and frequency response, the Eversolo tries its utmost to have as little input as possible even though it’s responsible for D-to-A conversion – the sound you get, in these respects, seems very much to be the sound stored on the disc, the digital file or whatever.

What the DAC-Z10 will do is ensure that low frequencies are shaped and controlled to the point that rhythmic expression is coherent and momentum levels never dip below what is appropriate.

It takes care of the minor dynamic variations with just as much ease as it does with every other aspect of detail retrieval – and when the music undergoes big shifts in intensity or volume, as it does during a listen to Daniel Blumberg’s soundtrack to The Brutalist, the Eversolo is able to describe them in full, and in the most articulate manner.

It ensures the top of the frequency range always carries enough substance to prevent its bite becoming problematic, and allows the midrange to project with real confidence.

And the bigger and more information-packed the audio content you serve it, the more impressive the DAC-Z10 sounds. A DSD64 file of Michael Jackon’s Off the Wall sounds positively ferocious once the Eversolo has done with it – the clean, open and pristine recording (especially in 2024 remaster guise) sounds more animated, more immediate, and more engaging than it does via any even vaguely price-comparable alternative. And there are plenty of very capable, vaguely price-comparable, alternatives around.

Sound quality score: 5 / 5

(Image credit: Simon Lucas)Eversolo DAC-Z10 review: Design

Aluminum chassis
A choice of VU meters, spectrum displays and control dial colors
310x88x365mm / 12.2x3.5x13.4in (WxHxD)

As is only to be expected, given the asking price, the Eversolo DAC-Z10 is carefully constructed from premium materials, and finished to an extremely high standard. Fundamentally it’s simply a rectangular box in the established ‘hi-fi’ manner – but in terms of look, feel and finish it’s a fairly upmarket proposition.

It’s not quite as wide as your average hi-fi separate, but nevertheless Eversolo has found space for an 8.8-inch touchscreen that’s bright, clear and responsive, and is able to display a great deal of information without looking in any way crowded.

It forms the majority of the fascia of a chassis built from aircraft-grade aluminum and coated in a soft(ish)-touch finish that only adds to the impression of refined good taste.

Eversolo has remembered to make sure the design of the DAC-Z10 is enjoyable as well as admirable, too. As well as an exhaustive amount of relevant information, the screen can display a number of different VU meters or dynamic spectrum displays – and the single ‘turn/push’ control dial alongside it can be illuminated in one of quite a few different colors.

Design score: 5 / 5

(Image credit: Simon Lucas)Eversolo DAC-Z10 review: Usability & setup

Remote control, app and touchscreen control options
Some end-user tweaking available
Switchable XLR polarity

Despite its wealth of features and extensive functionality, setting up and operating the DAC-Z10 is pretty straightforward. And you have plenty of options, too.

Obviously the first thing to do is make your relevant connections into and out of the device. The DAC-Z10 will support plenty of digital devices, of course, and there’s the ability to route a single analog source through too – which is useful if you’re connecting directly to a power amplifier rather than a pair of powered or active speakers.

It’s worth noting the XLR connections have switchable polarity, which makes system-matching a great deal more straightforward than it otherwise would be. After that it’s just a question of trimming each individual input in terms of volume – every digital input can have a choice of six filters applied, which allows the end user a fair amount of input into the way the quartet of DAC chips performs.

In terms of control, you’ve a gratifying number of well-implemented options. The control wheel, which is a turn/push number, is responsive and reliable, and the same can be said for the weighty little remote control handset that is, in its own way, just as tactile a device as the DAC-Z10 itself. The touchscreen is equally simple and logical to use, and just as reliable in the way it reacts.

Best of all, though, is the ‘Eversolo Control’ app that’s free for iOS and Android. It’s far from the most visually exciting control app around, it’s true – but once you get beyond the relative lack of visual stimulation you’ll find a thorough, stable and eminently useful interface that enables you to control every single aspect of the DAC-Z10’s performance.

Usability & setup score: 5 / 5

(Image credit: Simon Lucas)Eversolo DAC-Z10 review: Value

It costs a lot, but it does a lot
Performs as well or better than anything else at the same price
Versatility really adds to its value as a long-term buy

Obviously spending this sort of money on a DAC with preamplification functionality means you have a system that justifies the outlay, and in that case there’s really no arguing with the value for money that’s on offer here.

The amount of things it can do, the range of connections it has, the usefulness of its various control options, and the impeccable quality of its audio mean that its price is very agreeable… to people with this kind of money to spend.

Value score: 4 / 5

Should I buy the Eversolo DAC-Z10?Buy it if…

You have digital audio sources that need a proper decoding
Even quite expensive CD players and the like will feel the benefit of the DAC-Z10's audio expression.View Deal

You enjoy a good user interface
The touchscreen and, especially, the control app are as it good as it gets.View Deal

You love a virtual VU meter
Or, even better, a choice of virtual VU meters.View Deal

Don't buy it if…

Graphic design is your passion
The control app may be entirely fit for purpose, but it is tedious in the extreme to look atView Deal

You’re hoping to make an ordinary system sound extraordinary
The Eversolo is not especially tolerant of inferior partners.View Deal

Eversolo DAC-Z10 review: Also consider

Audiolab D9
On a pound-for-pound basis, the D9 DAC/preamplifier is a very decent bet – for a little over half the price of the Eversolo, it gives you a great deal of solid audio competence.View Deal

Chord Hugo TT2
If you’re after something slightly more portable, this an exceptional device – it doesn’t come cheap, though, and it has one of those user interfaces that Chord seems to think is a good idea but the rest of us get madly frustrated by. View Deal

How I tested the Eversolo DAC-Z10

I slotted the Eversolo DAC-Z10 into my reference system – so it took care of the digital-to-analog conversion required by a Rega Apollo CD player, a Naim Uniti Star (meaning internet radio, network streaming and music streaming service content was available), and an Apple MacBook Pro via USB to access digital audio of the highest possible resolution.

It also accepted an analog signal from a pre-amplified Technics SL-1300G turntable. It was connected to a Cambridge Edge W power amplifier via balanced XLR connections, which in turn was connected to Bowers & Wilkins 705 S3 Signature loudspeakers on their bespoke FS-700 S3 stands.

Read TechRadar's reviews guarantee
First reviewed: February 2026

Categories: Reviews

Acer Veriton GN100 AI mini PC workstation - another AI development system using the same Nvidia Grace Blackwell foundations

Sat, 02/14/2026 - 01:20

I’m not going to get to have the Acer Veriton GN100 for long, so this is more of a hands-on discussion than an actual review.

My first reaction, out of the box, to the Acer Veriton GN100 is that it all seems remarkably familiar. An elegant mini-PC style case with a car-grill aesthetic, a selection of USB-C ports alongside a 10GbE LAN port and the mercurial NVIDIA ConnectX-7 SmartNIC.

While it’s physically a little smaller, the ports on this machine are identical to those on the ASUS Ascent GX10, as both brands followed Nvidia’s Blackwell system plan exactly.

The only significant difference is that where the Asus provided access to the single M.2 NVMe drive that was installed, the Acer Veriton GN100 is an entirely sealed unit, where whatever storage it has can’t be replaced or upgraded.

Inside is the same Nvidia DGX Spark Personal AI Supercomputer built around the ARM v9.2-A CPU and Blackwell GPU integrated silicon. This, when combined with 128GB of LPDDR5 memory and 4TB of NVMe storage, is collectively called the GB10 platform.

This is a remarkably powerful platform that has uses in data science, medical image analysis, robotics and AI model development. To be clear, this isn’t a Windows PC, and an understanding of Linux is required to use it.

As the specification suggests, this isn’t an inexpensive item, starting at $2999 for the US-supplied hardware, but £3999.99 in Europe. For those who want a highly compact and efficient development environment, especially for AI, the Acer Veriton GN100 is an option, but it isn’t the only machine available using the same platform.

Acer Veriton GN100: Price and availability

How much does it cost? From $3000, £4000
When is it out? Available now
Where can you get it? Available from Acer and online retailers

To avoid any confusion about specifications, Acer decided there would be only one SKU of the Veriton GN100, with 128GB of LPDDR5 and 4TB of storage.

Inexplicably, it costs £3999.99 direct from Acer in the UK, but only $2999.99 from Acer in the US. Why do we pay 82% more for an identical part when the UK doesn't tariff Taiwanese goods, Acer?

Also, this product doesn’t seem to be available elsewhere, so finding it cheaper on Amazon, for example, isn’t currently possible.

The alternatives built around the same platform are the ‘founders edition’ Nvidia DGX Spark Personal AI Supercomputer, ASUS Ascent GX10, Gigabyte AI TOP ATOM Desktop Supercomputer, and MSI EdgeXpert Desktop AI Supercomputer.

The Nvidia DGX Spark Personal AI Supercomputer, as the originator modestly calls it, undercuts the Veriton GN100 in the UK and costs £ 3699.98 for a system with 128GB of RAM and 4TB of storage. But, it’s more expensive for US customers, costing $3999 on Amazon.com.

The ASUS Ascent GX10 price on Amazon.com is $3088.94 for the 1TB storage SKU (GX10-GG0015BN), and $4,149.99 for the 4TB storage model (GX10-GG0016BN).

Even with the current price of M.2 modules, that is a remarkable price hike for the extra storage capacity.

For UK customers, the 1TB ASUS Ascent GX10 model price is £3713.02, but I found it via online retailer SCAN for a tempting £2799.98. SCAN also carries a 2TB option for $3199.99 and the 4TB model for £3638.99.

The Gigabyte AI TOP ATOM Desktop Supercomputer 4TB model sells for £3479.99 from SCAN in the UK, and can be found on Amazon.com for $3999.

And the final model with the same spec as most is the MSI EdgeXpert Desktop AI Supercomputer, selling for £3,598.99 from SCAN in the UK, and $3998.01 on Amazon.com for US customers.

The conclusion is that the US price is difficult to beat, whereas the European pricing is wildly out of what competitors are charging for this technology.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)Acer Veriton GN100: Specs

Item

Spec

CPU:

ARM v9.2-A CPU (GB10) (20 ARM cores, 10 Cortex-X925, 10 Corex-A725)

GPU:

NVIDIA Blackwell GPU (GB10, integrated)

RAM:

128 GB LPDDR5x, unified system memory

Storage:

4TB M.2 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD storage

Expansion:

N/A

Ports:

3x USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 Type-C, 20Gbps, alternate mode (DisplayPort 2.1)

1x USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 Type-C,with PD in(180W EPR PD3.1 SPEC)

1x HDMI 2.1

1x NVIDIA ConnectX-7 SmartNIC

Networking:

10GbE LAN, AW-EM637 Wi-Fi 7 (Gig+) , Bluetooth 5.4

OS:

Nvidia DGX OS (Ubuntu Linux)

PSU:

48V 5A 240W

Dimensions:

150 x 150 x 50.5 mm

Weight:

1.2kg

Acer Veriton GN100: Design

Oversized NUC
Connect-7 scalability
Zero internal access

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

While the GN100 looks like an oversized NUC mini PC, at 1.2kg, it's heavy, although it is lighter than the ASUS Ascent GX10 by over 200g.

In order to drive the monster silicon inside, Acer included a Delta-made PSU that’s rated to 240W over USB-C.

All the ports are on the back of this system, and nothing is on the front, not even the power button, other than some visual styling and the Acer logo.

These include, identical to the ASUS Ascent GX10, four USB-C ports, one of which is required for the PSU to connect, a single 10GbE LAN port and a single HDMI 2.1 video out.

This arrangement enables a single monitor using HDMI, but additional ones using the USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 ports in DP Alt mode, although one is exclusively needed to power the unit.

Why Nvidia chose USB 3.2 and not USB4 seems curious, since the models and data processed on this unit will eventually need to make it somewhere else, and the best networking on offer is 10GbE, which equals roughly 900MB/s transfer speeds.

And for those working on the hardware, the lack of any USB-A ports for mice or keyboards looks a bit silly.

However, this hardware is intended to be used ‘headless’ using a remote console, so perhaps that isn’t an issue in the greater scheme of things.

Where this design sheds any resemblance to PC hardware is with the inclusion of a ConnectX-7 Smart NIC, a technology acquired by Nvidia when it bought Mellanox Technologies Ltd, an Israeli-American multinational supplier of computer networking products based on InfiniBand and Ethernet.

In this context, ConnectX-7 is like those annoying cables that Nvidia used to make video cards work collectively, when they cared about video cards. Except that the capacity amount of bandwidth that can travel over ConnectX-7 is substantially more.

The port has two receptacles, with each capable of 100GbE, allowing 200GbE to flow between the GN100 and another, doubling the number of AI parameters from 200 billion in a single machine to 400 billion when buddied up to another.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)Acer Veriton GN100: Features

ARM 20-core CPU
Grace Blackwell GB10
AI platforms compared

The Nvidia GB10 Grace Blackwell Superchip marks a notable advancement in AI hardware, created through a partnership between Nvidia and ARM. It arises from the growing need for specialised computing platforms to keep pace with the rapid development and deployment of artificial intelligence models. Unlike a typical PC, the GB10 is designed around the ARM v9.2-A architecture, incorporating 20 ARM cores (10 Cortex-X925 and 10 Cortex-A725). This reflects a wider industry move towards ARM-based options, which are more power-efficient than PC processors, and potentially more scalable for AI tasks.

The capabilities of the GB10 are impressive. It combines a robust Nvidia Blackwell GPU with the ARM CPU, achieving up to a petaFLOP of AI performance with FP4 precision. This level of power is especially suitable for training and inference of large language models and diffusion models, which are fundamental to much of today’s generative AI. The system is further supported by 128GB of unified LPDDR5x memory, enabling it to handle demanding AI tasks efficiently.

The caveat to all this power and memory is that PC architectures aren’t designed to exploit them effectively, and Microsoft Windows memory management has long been an issue.

Therefore, to be efficient and communicate effectively with other nodes, the GB10 needs Ubuntu Linux, modified with NVIDIA’s DGX OS, to harness the platform's power and handle multi-node communications.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

As I already mentioned, the GB10 delivers up to 1 petaFLOP at FP4 precision, ideal for quantised AI workloads. But that is still less than the multi-petaFLOP performance of NVIDIA’s flagship data centre chips, the Blackwell B200 or GB200.

However, where it goes toe-to-toe is in respect of power efficiency, since this node only consumes around 140W, which is much less than the Blackwell B200, which can consume between 1000W and 1200W per GPU. The GB200 combines two B200 chips and a Grace CPU, and the power demand can bloom to 2,700W. Although these systems might offer up to 20 Petabytes of performance, at around 19 times the power.

The balance here is that the GN100 can sit on your desk without needing any special services or environment, whereas the datacentre hardware needs a specialist location and services to ensure it doesn’t overheat or cause the local electricity network to fail.

In this respect, the GN100 and its counterparts represent the more realistic end of the AI wedge, but how useful they can be is dependent on what you are attempting to do, and if this much power is enough for your purposes.

Acer Veriton GN100: AI Reality Check

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

In my prior Asus GX10 coverage, I talked at length about AI, and how there are lots of people making a bet that it is the next big thing, and others who are much more critical of the technology and how it's developing.

I’m not going to rehash the obvious flaws of AI, or the lack of a path to address all of those, but I would strongly recommend researching before starting any AI endeavour and creating expectations that either can’t be met with current technology, or the power in this physically small computer.

What I can say is that recent AI releases have substantially improved over previous generations, but access to these advanced models, like ChatGPT 5.3 Codex and Claude 4.0, is ringfenced for paid subscribers using the Cloud.

Obviously, the beauty of a device like the GN100 is that you can download these models and run them on your own hardware, even if getting the most out of them requires them to be connected to the Internet to source information.

For those interested, running GPT-5.3-Codex on this hardware requires you to install Tailscale and a local inference engine like Ollama, pull the codex to the GN100 using the appropriate commands. Then you can open up an Open WebUI from another system, ideally, and use the model.

For anyone familiar with Linux, none of this is especially taxing. But to make it even easier, the ChatGPT team (or is that the AI?) has made a Codex App that does most of the legwork for you.

If you want to try something else, some models come in pre-prepared Docker Containers that can simply be installed and executed, making deployment remarkably straightforward.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

When you first power the system up, you are presented with a web interface created for the Nvidia DGX Spark, and install VS Code, the DGX Dashboard with JupyterLab, Open WebUI with Ollama and Comfy UI.

To be clear, this isn’t like a Windows application install. You are given instructions as to the commands you need to execute, which install the tools and libraries that are needed. Those who don’t use Linux every day will find it a challenge, but eventually, even I managed to get almost everything working, at least enough to load models and create some output. Image generation was especially impressive, although some of the deep thinking models aren’t that responsive if you ask them something genuinely challenging.

Some people might assume that because the code for these models is being run locally on the GN100, the cost of a subscriber model should be cheaper. But I’ve not noticed that so far, you just get better performance and save the creators' electricity bill. What running a model on this hardware gives you is that you own the model, it can’t be removed from you, and there is the potential for you control the model, customising it in a specific and personal way.

For those exploring AI in a serious way its necessary to use the latest models, and that often has a cost implication, even if you own the hardware platform.

What you certainly don’t want to do is install some free model from a couple of years ago, and then be disappointed with the results. The steepness of the curve of development on models is extraordinary, and even versions of the best ones from six months ago have been overtaken by the latest releases.

For those working in this area, using modern AI is like trying to get onto a bus when they don’t stop or even slow down to allow passengers on or off. Being aware of where the model of interest is, and when it's been overtaken, is critical to not being completely out of date before the project is completed.

Acer Veriton GN100: Early verdict

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

NVIDIA decided to ship its Grace Blackwell technology in an entry-level form and created a blueprint for that in their NVIDIA DGX Spark Personal AI Supercomputer, its partners are delivering their versions, like the Acer Veriton GN100.

Other than the outer case and a few other small choices, it's debatable how much variation we’re likely to see between these machines. It’s not like the GPUs, where the partners get to design variations and even tweak the founders' editions for better performance.

Maybe if these become massively popular, then we might see more variation, like combining two systems in a single box, or blending the technology with DAS storage. But for now, this is where we are.

That said, the Acer version is perfectly serviceable, but when the specifications are so close its mostly about price. For Americans paying $2999 for the GN100, it's probably one of the cheapest options, and for those in Europe, oddly, it's one of the more expensive. Perhaps Acer can fix that for Europeans, but given the rising cost of RAM, it's more likely the USA will have to pay more.

The one weakness of this design is the lack of access to the SSD, and if that’s a deal breaker for you, some other machines do have that capability.

As ever, Acer has delivered a workable solution for demanding computing tasks, but what this brand can’t guarantee is the skills needed to make the most from their platform. Buyers need to appreciate that while the hardware offers more than ten times the AI processing of a high-end PC, making the most of what it can do requires a particular skill set.

For more compact computing, see our guide to the best mini PCs you can buy

Categories: Reviews

I tested the Viltrox 85mm f/1.4 Pro for two months — here's why this classic portrait lens beats pricey first-party glass

Fri, 02/13/2026 - 19:00

Viltrox AF 85mm F1.4 Pro: one-minute review

I've had a busy time reviewing Viltrox lenses this year – including a range of primes such as the cheap and characterful 'body cap' 28mm f/4.5 lens, my dream reportage photography 35mm f/1.2 lens, the buttery bokeh-delivering 135mm f/1.8 LAB and the lightweight 50mm f/2 Air. Now, it's the turn of the AF 85mm F1.4 Pro.

It's designed for full-frame and is currently available for Sony and Nikon cameras only, with no word yet on an L-mount version (Fujifilm's X-mount is APS-C, and there's already an equivalent 56mm F1.2 Pro lens available). It's the first 'Pro' autofocus lens I've tested in Viltrox's range, which also includes the AF 50mm F1.4 and various APS-C lenses, including the 27mm F1.2 and 75mm F1.2 (for Sony E, Fujifilm X and Nikon Z).

In short, it's the classic portrait lens for pro photographers, with upper-body portraits and dreamy animal portraits (think cats and dogs) being its speciality. I also like the focal length for street photography.

Just 15mm in length – Viltrox AF 28mm f/4.5 is a true body-cap lens, with a much faster f/4.5 aperture than other such optics, including the Panasonic 26mm f/8. If you don't mind something a little larger and pricier, there are f/2.8 alternatives (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

In the hand, the Viltrox 85mm F1.4 Pro's rugged build quality is immediately evident – this is a weather-sealed metal lens, with a range of external controls for photo and video work, even if it lacks the digital display found in Viltrox's flagship 'LAB' lenses.

Image quality is top drawer in every regard, too, demonstrating everything you'd hope for in a portrait lens; detail is sharp, bokeh is smooth, lens distortions are minimal. And then comes the mic drop: this lens costs just $589 / £569 / AU$919 – that's a third of the price of Sony's 85mm F1.4 GM II, and almost half the price of Sigma's 85mm f1.4 Art DG DN. It's regularly on sale for less, too.

Surely we can forget these rival lenses then, and save a packet with the Viltrox AF 85mm F1.4 Pro instead? Not quite. At 800g and measuring 108.5mm in length, this is a hefty lens that's a fair bit heavier than rivals. If an 85mm f/1.4 lens is your workhorse optic, it could be well worth forking out extra for a lighter alternative.

Viltrox AF 85mm F1.4 Pro: price and availability

Available in Sony E and Nikon Z-mount versions
It costs $598 / £569 / AU$919
Viltrox regularly discounts its lenses – there's 15% off the AF 85mm F1.4 Pro at the time of writing

Viltrox's 'Pro' series, which includes the 85mm F1.4 lens, sits between its flagship 'LAB' series, and above its lightweight 'EVO' in terms of both price and quality. At $598 / £569 / AU$919, it's not a cheap lens by any means, and is the priciest of a trio of Viltrox 85mm lenses, with an f/1.8 and f/2 EVO also available. That said, the f/1.4 aperture is a better option, especially for pros who work in challenging situations, including indoors and low light.

The lens is currently available in Sony E and Nikon Z versions, but not L-mount or Canon RF (don't expect the latter – Canon has locked Viltrox out. But for reference, Canon's own 85mm F1.4L VCM costs 3x the price of Viltrox's, and for me is very similar).

A fairer comparison for value, then, is against Nikon and Sony's own 85mm lenses, plus lenses from other third parties such as Sigma. Nikon doesn't have a f/1.4 version in its range yet.

Here's how the Sony and Nikon-mount 85mm lenses stack up (spoiler alert – the Viltrox wins on value):

Sony E mount

Nikon Z mount

Viltrox AF 85mm F1.4 Pro

$598 / £569 / AU$919

Nikon Z 85mm F1.2 S

N/A

$2,999 / £2,799 / AU$4,749

NIKKOR Z 85mm f/1.8 S

N/A

$849 / £789 / AU$1,399

Sigma 85mm F1.4 DG DN Art

$1,319 / £979 / AU$1,596

N/A

Sony FE 85mm F1.4 GM II

$2,049 / £1,799 / AU$2,499

N/A

Sony FE 85mm F1.8

$649 / £499 / AU$949

N/A

Viltrox AF 85mm F1.4 Pro: specsViltrox AF 28mm f/4.5 specs

Type:

Mid-telephoto prime

Mount:

Sony E, Nikon Z

Sensor:

Full-frame

Focal length:

85mm

Max aperture:

f/1.4

Minimum focus:

0.79m, 0.13x max magnification

Filter size:

77mm

Dimensions:

84.5 x 108.5mm

Weight:

28.2oz / 800g (lens only)

Viltrox AF 85mm F1.4 Pro: design

Durable, weather-sealed design, but prone to scratches
Around 25% heavier than alternatives
External controls suit photo and video work

Tim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanTim Coleman

The Viltrox AF 85mm F1.4 Pro's build quality and design are clearly excellent, and remind me of Sony's current standard-focal-length GM lenses – and even more so of Canon's new range of hybrid 'VCM' lenses, which includes a triple-the-price 85mm F1.4L VCM. As mentioned, Viltrox isn't permitted to make Canon RF lenses, but I've used both the Canon RF 85mm F1.4L VCM and Viltrox AF 85mm F1.4 Pro, and I'm having a hard time spotting any meaningful differences, besides the Canon lens being 25% lighter.

There's a ridged aperture ring that can be set to clicked or smooth adjustments between aperture values, and which could host a follow-focus mechanism for cinematic manual focusing, equipping the Viltrox 85mm lens well for photo and video work. Elsewhere, there's an AF/MF switch, a custom button, plus a large focus ring – every control is beautifully dampened / smooth in operation.

A rear rubber seal confirms the weather-sealing, and you'll find a USB-C port within the metal rear mount, through which future firmware upgrades can be installed.

Tim ColemanTim Coleman

Viltrox supplies a chunky lens hood which easily screws on and off, while the lens accepts the common 77mm size of threaded filters.

There's a reassuring weight to the metal lens, although it's perhaps a little too weighty for its own good; at 800g it's around 25% heavier than the aforementioned Sony, Sigma and Canon equivalents. Measuring 108mm in length, it's similar in size to the Sony lens but bigger than Sigma's.

Despite its weight, I thought the balance between the Viltrox lens and mid-range Nikon camera, with which I was testing the lens, felt pretty good. I wouldn't want it any heavier or longer, but it just about sits within comfortable limits – and it would be an even better match with chunkier a Nikon Z8.

Over the course of two months with the lens I've managed to look after it, and it still looks pristine. However, I've tested other Viltrox lenses in other scenarios with less care, including the AF 35mm F1.2 LAB which has a similar finish, and they've proved to be prone to scratches. I'm not going to test that theory for the sake of it, but that's my word of warning.

Viltrox AF 85mm F1.4 Pro: Performance

11-blade rounded aperture with f/1.4 to f/16 range, capable of smooth bokeh
Speedy and reliable VCM autofocus
Extremely sharp between f/2 and f/8

Tim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanTim Coleman

That big f/1.4 aperture is for sure a major selling point of the lens, especially when you consider that Viltrox already has two 85mm lenses for full-frame cameras in its range: the original 85mm f/1.8 and an 85mm f/2 EVO – the latter is the lightweight and affordable choice.

You can see how chunky the diameter of the lens is in the product gallery above, plus how big the lens aperture is through the range, with a generous 11-blades creating a circular aperture for attractive bokeh.

Like Canon's range of hybrid lenses, the Viltrox 85mm lens employs a Voice Coil Motor (VCM) which drives autofocus, and the result is snappy autofocus – it's quicker in my experience than Viltrox's pricier 135mm f/1.8 LAB.

Focusing is internal, meaning the lens size remains unchanged as it focuses, and that there are 'floating' lens elements inside. That means there's an unsettling rattling noise when moving the lens when it's not on the camera, or when the camera is not turned on. There's nothing to worry about here – that's totally normal, and it's the same with all such lenses. Those elements 'lock', and are ready to go for focusing when paired with a camera that's turned on.

f/1.4Tim Colemanf/1.8Tim Colemanf/2Tim Colemanf/4Tim Colemanf/1.4Tim Colemanf/1.8Tim Colemanf/2Tim Colemanf/2.8Tim Colemanf/4.5Tim Coleman

Image quality impresses, truly. Detail is incredibly sharp, especially between f/2 and f/8, where lens distortion is also pretty much non-existent. Open the lens to f/1.4 and there's vignetting (darkening in the corners), but that's gone by somewhere between f/2 and f/2.8.

An 85mm f/1.4 lens is a good option for product photography – I used it for my Instax Mini Evo Cinema shotsTim ColemanAnd of course it's a top choice for portraiture, especially head and shoulder shotsTim ColemanI can't take credit for this photo – unlike the previous self portraits where I've shot remotely through Nikon's app, my son took this one of me with my daughter on a hikeTim ColemanIt's also a decent option for animal portraits!Tim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanThe f/1.4 aperture lets in plenty of light, which makes the lens a great choice for low light / indoor shotsTim ColemanTim Coleman

Only in the most extreme scenarios, and with all lens corrections turned off, have I seen chromatic aberrations in my photos. One example was an image that included dew drops on a backlit cobweb.

Bokeh is super-smooth. Provided you're relatively close to your subject and shooting between f/1.4 and f/2.8, you'll typically get smooth and big bokeh that's rounded in shape – no ugly onion-ring effect in sight.

Increase focus distance and, as bokeh consequently gets smaller, it can go a little cats-eye in shape. Overall, however, bokeh looks lovely, and is a real reason to opt for this 85mm lens over Viltrox's other offerings.

At f/5, detail is staggeringly sharp across the entire frameTim ColemanAgain, f/5.6 delivers crisp detail, and with the compression effect of the mid telephoto focal length, the background can still be blurred here for decent subject separationTim ColemanI opted for f/1.4 here for a dreamy effectTim ColemanOne big strike against the lens is its limiting minimum focus distance. I wish I could get closer to subjects like this fungiTim ColemanThe out of focus dew drops in this photo exhibit a little chromatic aberration distortion, but I'd expect that from such a subject, and with lens corrections turned off.Tim Coleman

As is the case with other 85mm f/1.4 full-frame lenses, macro photography is not the Viltrox lens's forte. Minimum focus distance is 0.79m, making for a modest 0.13x maximum magnification. To be clear, the Sony and Sigma alternatives are no better.

Close focusing beyond the lens's capabilities is hardly the regular concern of a portrait photographer, but for me I like mixing up what I photograph, and would appreciate more versatile close focusing – it would make for a more complete lens.

Should you buy the Viltrox AF 85mm F1.4 Pro?

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)Buy it if...

You specialize in portraiture
Upper-body portraits, animal portraits – if these are your thing, you'll want to pick up a pro lens like this.

You're a pro on a budget
You'll get similar performance from this lens to what you'll get from much pricier alternatives.

Don't buy it if...

You regularly shoot long and demanding portrait sessions
If portrait photography is your full-time job, it could be worth stretching your budget to a pricier but lighter alternative (Sony users in particular).

You'd like a versatile prime
With modest close-focusing, the 85mm lens is fairly niche – it works well for portraiture and street / documentary photography, but not a great deal else.

How I tested the Viltrox AF 85mm F1.4 Pro

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Viltrox loaned me a Z-mount version of the lens
I paired it with my full-frame Nikon Z6 II
My review period spanned two months, and I used the lens in a range of scenarios

Viltrox sent me a Z-mount version of the lens at the back end of 2025, which has given me plenty of opportunity to test it out in various scenarios with my Nikon Z6 II full-frame mirrorless camera (but not with an APS-C body).

I set up my Z6 II for the lens, including the various subject-detection autofocus modes (Auto area, with specific subject detection based on what I was shooting).

I used it indoors and outdoors, in good light and bad, and I shot sequences of the same photos through the aperture range in order to check for lens distortion, sharpness, bokeh and so on.

First reviewed February 2026

Categories: Reviews

I flew the world’s lightest bi-copter drone, and it’s the most fun I’ve had outside of FPV drones – but there's a catch

Fri, 02/13/2026 - 11:00

V-Copter Falcon Mini: one-minute review

From ZeroZero Robotics, the drone company responsible for the impressive HoverAir X1 Pro and ProMax selfie drones, comes another interesting model: the V-Copter Falcon Mini. This is a sub-250g version of the V-Copter Falcon, which was released in 2020 and weighed 26.8oz / 760g. The original Falcon was admired for its unique design, and gained a cult following, but it never quite made it into the mainstream.

With the launch of the more regulator-friendly sub-250g Falcon Mini, with availability on Amazon on the horizon, it looks like this new model has greater potential than its predecessor. You may be wondering what makes these drones interesting, and it’s the simple fact that they’re bi-copters rather than quadcopters, so they only have two motors and two sets of rotors, rather than the standard four.

The advantage here is that the Falcon Mini is extremely agile and quiet compared to standard quadcopters. You can even install the propellers upside down to fly the drone upside down in Reverse Flight mode, which is a bit gimmicky, but is possible due to the rotors having tilt mechanisms that help to keep the drone steady in a hover and during flight.

@techradar

♬ original sound - TechRadar

This is a drone that’s more about flight than image capture, in my opinion. Sure, the Falcon Mini has a camera, and can capture up to 4K 30fps video and shoot 12MP JPEGs, but the camera is completely automatic. With no manual control, not even exposure adjustments, you're beholden to how the camera’s light meter responds to what’s in front of it. So, nipping around upright and in Reverse Flight mode are the order of the day.

(Image credit: James Abbott)V-Copter Falcon Mini: price and release date

Available at Amazon US by the end of February 2026
European launch by the end of March 2026
Standard kit and Fly More Combo available

The Falcon Mini will officially launch at the end of February 2026, after a crowdfunding campaign on Indiegogo raised $519,461 from 1,338 backers. The drone will be available at Amazon US at this time, with two kits available: Standard and the Fly More Combo.

The Standard kit will cost $379 in the US, while ZeroZero Robotics says the European launch will follow by the end of March, with a retail price of £379. The Fly More Combo will cost $399 / £399, respectively.

The Standard kit is the single-battery option, while the Fly More Combo includes a couple of extra batteries, a two-battery charging hub and a carry bag. This option, as with all drones, is going to be the best option for most people because of value, and the simple fact that more batteries increase flight times.

I'll update this page with links for purchase once the product is available to buy.

Price score: 3/5

V-Copter Falcon Mini: specsV-Copter Falcon Mini specs

Camera:

12MP 1/2.3-inch CMOS

Video resolution:

Frame rates:

4K 30fps / 2.7K up to 50fps / 1080p 50fps

Video transmission range:

Up to 1.5 miles

Flight modes:

Normal, Sport, Turbo

Battery:

2330mAh; up to 34 minutes flight time

Charger type:

USB-C / battery charging hub

Weight:

8.78oz / 249g

Dimensions:

Folded: 7.24 x 3.74 x 2.36 inches / 183.9 x 95 x 59.9mm

Unfolded 5.91 x 8.98 x 5.12 inches / 150.1 x 228.1 x 130mm

V-Copter Falcon Mini: Design

Unique bi-copter design
Folding propeller arms
Tilting rotors

The one thing you cannot get away from is the Falcon Mini's unique design: it’s a bi-copter rather than a quadcopter, like we’re used to. Not only does this drastically change the way the drone looks, but it also makes the Falcon Mini surprisingly quiet in flight when compared to quadcopters. To compensate for having just two rotors, there are proprietary tilt-rotor controls and twin servo motors that precisely adjust the angles of the propellers to create balance and stability during flight. These also allow for fast acceleration by tilting the propellers.

Moving back to the basic design, as the name suggests, the V-Copter Falcon Mini creates a unique V shape in the sky. At certain angles, only having two propeller arms makes it tricky to see in the sky because it's such a compact drone.

Folded, the Falcon Mini is just 7.24 x 3.74 x 2.36 inches / 183.9 x 95 x 59.9mm, and it extends to 5.91 x 8.98 x 5.12 inches / 150.1 x 228.1 x 130mm when unfolded, with a weight of 8.78oz / 249g. You can buy the Falcon Mini in two colors: Matte Black and Canary Yellow.

James AbbottJames AbbottJames AbbottJames Abbott

If you opt for the Fly More Combo you’ll benefit from a two-battery charging hub. This is, of course, much quicker for charging batteries than doing it individually in the drone. However, it’s strange that ZeroZero opted for just two battery slots when the Fly More Combo includes three batteries.

ZeroZero claims that the 2330mAh batteries provide up to 34 minutes of flight time, but during testing this was much shorter in real-world flying conditions. Flight times were around 20 minutes until batteries reached 20% and indicated that performance had been limited, and that the drone should be landed. Battery testing took place on a mild winter day in temperatures of around 50F / 10C, so battery life should improve slightly during warmer months, although I can't see that it would ever reach 34 minutes.

James AbbottJames AbbottJames AbbottJames Abbott

The controller is simply designed and looks quite minimalist, although you have all the direct-access controls you need, including standard control sticks, a Return to Home/Stop button, a flight mode button, a photo button and a video button.

The phone holder folds back and stows away alongside the control sticks, and it’s rotated over to the front to hold your phone above the control sticks for use. With the vertical mode switched on, rotating your phone to portrait orientation sets the Falcon Mini to capture upright photos and videos.

Design score: 4/5

V-Copter Falcon Mini: Features and performance

Three flight speeds
Reverse flight (upside-down)
Agile flight

The Falcon Mini flies just like a standard quadcopter, although it’s considerably quieter. ZeroZero claims that it’s 50% quieter than a quadcopter, which makes sense since it has 50% the propellers and motors. Noise has been measured to be 62 decibels at two meters by ZeroZero, and it’s fair to say that the drone is noticeably quieter than the many quadcopters I've flown.

Flight, as previously mentioned, doesn’t feel dramatically different to a quadcopter despite only having two rotors. To compensate for less motors, the rotors tilt forward to boost airflow and generate thrust, with each rotor moving independently to allow for sharper turns. This, combined with the tilting rotors, does mean that the Falcon Mini can accelerate quickly when in its faster flight modes.

Normal mode allows for speeds of up to 8.9mph, Sport up to 26.8mph and Turbo up to 35.8mph. Sport is the mode that you’ll probably use the most, since it’s like Normal on other drones. Normal and Sport are accessed using a button on the controller, while Turbo is accessed via the V-Copter app. This option sits alongside Orbit and Zoom Out automated flight modes and the Reverse Flight Mode. Reverse Flight enables you to fly the Falcon Mini upside down, where it looks like it’s skating in mid-air rather than simply flying.

To do this, you have to refit the propellers upside down and use the Reverse Flight Kit, which is a plastic bracket that locks the propeller arms in their extended/unfolded position. Reverse Flight makes the drone even more agile in some respects, and with the propellers facing down you have to use hand take-offs and landings, which isn’t as bad as it sounds because you can grab the drone's airframe with your fingers, well away from the propellers.

For Reverse Flight, you’ll definitely need to be outside in an open area to reduce the risk of crashing. When you’re indoors, due to the lack of GPS signal the Falcon Mini goes into an indoor flight mode, in which the drone flies slower and is less responsive. It’s useful, but this isn’t the type of drone you’d typically want to fly indoors, unlike the HoverAir X1 Pro/ProMax with their built-in propeller guards.

Video transmission is 1.5 miles, which suggests the signal isn’t as strong as drones that offer transmission over six miles or more. What I did find during testing is that even when flying the Falcon Mini just a few hundred meters away from me in open space, I did occasionally receive low-signal warnings, and there was sometimes a lag in the camera view on the app screen.

Flight seems to be where the Falcon Mini Excels, thanks to its fast acceleration and agility. Plus, let’s not forget Reverse Flight, which is a bit of a gimmick, but it is unique and takes advantage of the drone’s innovative design. For me, this drone is about as fun as you can get with a camera drone in terms of flight, before you have to move on to FPV drones like the DJI Avata 2 to enjoy the most thrilling flights.

Performance score: 4/5

V-Copter Falcon Mini: Image and video quality

Fully automatic camera
Up to 4K 30fps video
Photos captured in JPEG only

(Image credit: James Abbott)

The Falcon Mini certainly sits within the camera drone category, and surprisingly comes with an extremely basic camera; this is what makes me think that this is a drone designed more for fun and flying than it is for image creation. The camera features a 12MP 1/2.3-inch CMOS sensor, which appears to be the same spec as the original V-Copter, but it could be a different, newer sensor.

This can capture video in 4K at 30fps, 2.7K up to 50fps and 1080p at 50fps, while vertical video is captured in 2.7K at 30fps. Photos can only be captured in JPEG format, which is a shame because raw files provide more editing flexibility. You capture photos in landscape and portrait format.

V-Copter Falcon Mini video

The camera is fully automatic – you just aim the camera and shoot – so it’s easy to use, but this does mean you have no control over exposure at all. It’s best to shoot with the sun behind the drone to avoid overexposure or underexposure, which does limit creativity somewhat.

James AbbottJames AbbottJames AbbottJames AbbottJames AbbottJames AbbottJames AbbottJames AbbottJames AbbottJames Abbott

Vertical shooting can be initiated by rotating the camera holder on the controller to portrait orientation. This is cropped vertical rather than natively captured vertical, as on the DJI Mini 5 Pro, but it’s still useful for capturing social media-ready footage. You simply have to activate the feature in the app menu, and it appears to use your phone’s accelerometer rather than the position of the phone holder.

Despite having only 50% of the rotors of ‘standard’ camera drones, the Falcon Mini’s 3-axis mechanical gimbal keeps footage smooth and lets you adjust the camera's angle depending on what you’re shooting, as with most drones.

There’s also a Night Mode for shooting at Night which, in a nutshell, optimizes the automatic camera for night capture. It works well, and I found most photos and videos captured at night to be satisfactory, but you can see heavy image processing in both cases, and the results are far from professional quality.

Image and video quality score: 3/5

V-Copter Falcon Mini: testing scorecardDJI Mini 5 Pro

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Price

The drone isn't expensive, but it should be cheaper than the direct competition.

3/5

Design

The design is undoubtedly unique, and works surprisingly well.

4/5

Performance

The Falcon Mini Flies well, and has the Reverse Flight mode trick up its sleeve.

4/5

Image and video quality

Image quality and camera functionality are what let this fun-to-fly drone down.

3/5

Should I buy the V-Copter Falcon Mini?Buy it if...

You'd like fun-to-fly drone
The Falcon mini is more about fun flight than it is for quality image capture – if you like to smile as you fly, this is about as fun as you can have outside of FPV drones.

You don’t need the best image capture
If you’d like a camera that can capture 4K video and photos with a fully automatic and worry-free camera, that's what you get with the Falcon Mini.

You want to turn heads
Being a bi-copter alone is enough to turn heads, but you’ll definitely do it with Reverse Flight, which enables you to fly upside down.

Don't buy it if...

You’d like obstacle avoidance
The Falcon Mini, like most sub-250g drones, doesn’t offer obstacle avoidance, so you have to take greater care when flying close to obstacles.

You want great image quality
If you're looking for the best image quality currently available in a sub-250g camera drone, the DJI Mini 5 Pro is your best bet by a long shot.

You'd prefer more features
The Falcon Mini is unique in its design and can even be flown upside down, but beyond this, its features are basic compared to those of some other mini drones.

V-Copter Falcon Mini: also consider

DJI Neo 2

The DJI Neo 2 is a selfie drone that can also be flown like a camera drone and an FPV drone with the required accessories. It offers obstacle avoidance, which is useful when flying the Neo like a camera drone or as a selfie drone. Video can be captured up to 4K, while photos can be captured in JPEG format, all for an impressively affordable price.

See our DJI Neo 2 reviewView Deal

DJI Mini 5 Pro

If you’d like a camera drone that's the best sub-250g model available, the DJI Mini 5 Pro is what you’re looking for. This impressive drone features a rotating camera with a 1-inch sensor and impressive image quality and features. This is a drone that’s perfect for beginners and professionals alike, thanks to its great image quality, safety features, build quality and more.

See our DJI Mini 5 Pro reviewView Deal

(Image credit: James Abbott)How I tested the V-Copter Falcon Mini

I tested the drone over a period of several weeks
I tested all of its features, including image and video capture
I assessed flight performance in its various modes

I tested the V-Copter Falcon Mini over several weeks, trying out all of the features and functionality, including Reverse Flight (upside-down flight). The drone was used in the same way as other camera drones to assess both flight performance and camera performance. The Falcon Mini was flown through a range of maneuvers to see how smooth and stable flight is with just two sets of rotors.

First reviewed: January 2026
Read more about how we test

Categories: Reviews

Shopify review 2026

Fri, 02/13/2026 - 10:42

Shopify is one of the most dominant ecommerce platforms globally, powering millions of online stores. The platform has evolved significantly in 2026 with its AI design tools and a revamped pricing structure.

We rigorously test the best ecommerce platforms across many criteria. All together, our reviewers have hands-on experience with more than 80 of the best website builders.

Read my full Shopify review to see why I still rate it as the best website builder for online stores.

Shopify pricing and plans

Shopify's pricing strikes me as reasonable for what you get, though the value proposition varies significantly across tiers. I appreciate the 25% discount when paying annually, but the jump between plans feels steep. Transaction fees on third-party payment processors can also eat into margins, especially on the lower tiers.

Plan

$/mo (paid monthly)

$/mo (paid annually)

Basic

$39

$29

Grow

$105

$79

Advanced

$399

$299

Plus

$2,300+

Pricing last verified: 13/02/2026

Shopify plans: Explained

Best for solo entrepreneurs
Starting at: $29/mo

The Basic plan gives you everything needed to launch your first store . You get 10 inventory locations, 24/7 chat support, and up to 77% shipping discounts .

However, you won't get any staff accounts, which surprised me.View Deal

Best for small teams
Starting at: $79/mo

I found the Grow plan offers the sweet spot for growing businesses. You get 5 staff accounts, better transaction rates (2.7% + 30¢), and enhanced shipping discounts up to 88%.

The lower transaction fees on third-party processors (1% vs 2%) make a real difference.View Deal

Best for scaling operations
Starting at $299/mo

The Advanced plan targets businesses hitting capacity limits on Grow. You get 15 staff accounts, 10x checkout capacity, and third-party calculated shipping rates.

The price jump feels justified only when you're consistently bumping against Grow's limitations.View Deal

Best for enterprise businesses
Starting at $2,300+/mo

Shopify Plus starts at $2,300/month on a 3-year commitment . You get 200 inventory locations, unlimited staff accounts, fully customizable checkout, and B2B capabilities.

I'd only recommend this for businesses exceeding $5 million in monthly revenue.View Deal

Getting started with Shopify: Reviewer's experience

Step 1: Onboarding

You can pick from an email, Google, Apple, or Facebook login. (Image credit: Shopify)

Creating my Shopify account took less than two minutes. I entered my email, created a password, and chose a store name. This launched a Setup guide that guided me through initial configurations.

It asked about my business goals upfront, which helped tailor subsequent recommendations.

Step 2: Store dashboard

Shopify's dashboard utilizes plenty of white space, making it simple to navigate. (Image credit: Shopify)

Everything felt logically organized with clear navigation paths in the dashboard. The left sidebar grouped related functions together, with options like Products, Orders, Customers, and Analytics.

I never felt lost during my testing, which speaks volumes about the interface design.

Step 3: Adding products

Uploading products is a breeze. For bulk uploading you can use a CSV file, saving you a bunch of time. (Image credit: Shopify)

Setting up my first product took about five minutes.

The product creation form included all necessary fields with tooltips explaining each option. I could add multiple images, set inventory levels, and configure variants among other things.

Step 4: Themes, design, and customization

Shopify comes with plenty of free themes, but serious stores may want to opt for a paid theme to get that premium look. These cost in the region of $140 to $500. (Image credit: Shopify)

Choosing and customizing a theme was straightforward because I wasn't looking to build anything fancy. Shopify's Theme Store offers both free and premium options.

I selected the free Horizon theme and launched into the theme editor. It let me rearrange sections, change colors, and upload my logo without touching code.

Step 5: AI content generator

Shopify's AI helper 'Sidekick' can help you create new pages and content with just a short prompt. (Image credit: Shopify)

Then, I tested the AI layout builder by describing a product page I wanted. Within seconds, Shopify generated a complete layout that I could customize further. The AI content generator helped me draft product descriptions quickly, though the output needed refining.

Shopify's business tools

Shopify offers the following business tools:

Point of Sale (POS) system
Inventory management and tracking
Order processing and fulfilment
Payment processing via Shopify Payments
Multi-location warehouse management
Tax and duty calculator

Shopify's business toolkit is vast yet practical. I found most essentials built right in, but for everything that isn't, you have third-party apps.

Read more about Shopify's business tools ▼

Point Of Sale (POS) system

Shopify makes it easy to integrate online and in person sales with its POS system. (Image credit: Shopify)

Setting up Shopify POS on an iPad takes about 10 minutes.

According to Shopify, POS sales grew 31% year-over-year globally over the most recent Black Friday, leading to the platform launching a host of new POS features in early 2025.

The interface syncs up with your online inventory, centralizing all data. However, the POS Lite plan feels limited. You don't get detailed reports or staff permissions. POS Pro costs $89/month per location.

Inventory management

Inventory management is crucial to online store success, especially for those with multiple locations or a large volume of products. Shopify's built in inventory management tool can help with this. (Image credit: Shopify)

The inventory system tracks stock across multiple locations in real-time. I could monitor 10 locations on the Basic plan, which seems generous. The interface shows stock levels clearly with color-coded alerts.

If I sold a product through POS, my online storefront would update instantly. However, advanced forecasting requires either the Stocky app or third-party solutions.

Order processing and fulfilment

Order processing is straight forward on Shopify, reducing potential stress and saving time on fulfilment. (Image credit: Shopify)

Processing felt snappy throughout my testing. Shopify’s dashboard displays orders chronologically with clear status indicators. I could fulfill orders, print shipping labels, and send tracking info without leaving the platform.

Shopify's pre-negotiated carrier rates claim it saves up to 77% on shipping. Label printing works smoothly with both desktop and mobile. But carrier-calculated rates at checkout cost extra on Basic.

One downside to Shopify's order management is the limited ability it offers when it comes to editing orders. For example, if a customer asks to swap products after the order has been placed, change their payment method, or edit a 'fulfilled' order, you cannot. Often this means orders need to be cancelled and placed again, adding unneeded work to often busy online store owners plates.

Shopify Payments

Alongside its own dedicated Shopify Payments option, you can pick from over 100 payment providers, helping you offer customers easier ways to pay. (Image credit: Shopify)

Setting up Shopify Payments took less than five minutes. It supports credit cards, Apple Pay, Google Pay, and Shop Pay.

I'd recommend sticking with Shopify Payments unless you have specific needs. Transaction fees are competitive: 2.9% + 30¢ on Basic. But using third-party processors adds 2% extra, which quickly eats profits.

Multi-location warehouse management

Businesses with multiple locations can benefit from this dedicated tool, helping better manage stock and reduce friction. (Image credit: Shopify)

I set up three test warehouses and assigned inventory to each.

Shopify automatically routes orders to optimal locations based on proximity. Stock transfers between locations happen through a simple interface. However, automated transfer recommendations require third-party apps.

Tax and duty calculator

For online stores managing tax is dull, time consuming, but essential. This tool can take a lot of the leg work, minimizing the time you spend on calculating tax. (Image credit: Shopify)

Shopify's tax calculator now works across all plans. I tested international orders and found the duty calculations accurate. The system displays full costs at checkout, preventing surprise fees for customers.

One caveat: Shopify charges a 0.5% transaction fee when duties are calculated. You'll also need duty-prepaid labels from third parties to avoid double-charging customers.

Shopify's marketing tools

Shopify offers the following marketing tools:

Email marketing via Shopify Email
Abandoned cart recovery
SEO optimization tools
Social media integration
Discount and coupon creation
Marketing automation with Shopify Flow
Analytics and reporting

Shopify's marketing features cover the basics well. I appreciated the email, workflow automation, and SEO tools. But advanced automation requires add-ons, which was a bit disappointing.

Read more about Shopify's marketing tools ▼

Shopify Email

Built in email marketing can help you re-engage potential customers, bringing them back to your site and driving sales. (Image credit: Shopify)

Shopify Email integrates into your admin panel. I created my first campaign in 15 minutes using pre-built templates. The editor lets you drag product images straight from your catalog.

You get 10,000 free emails monthly, which helps small businesses. Beyond that, it's $1 per 1,000 emails sent. The segmentation options felt basic compared to Klaviyo, but adequate for simple campaigns.

Abandoned cart recovery

Abandoned carts offer a prime opportunity to close a sale. (Image credit: Shopify)

Abandoned cart emails work automatically once enabled.

I set mine to send 10 hours after checkout abandonment. The system includes the cart contents and a direct checkout link. Setup took less than five minutes. I also liked how Shopify checks for email consent before sending to avoid compliance issues.

SEO tools

Optimizing your site and product pages for search engines is essential in helping customers find you, but can also take up a lot of time. Shopify's built in SEO tools can help speed this process up. (Image credit: Shopify)

The built-in SEO features cover fundamentals well. I could edit meta titles, descriptions, and URLs for each product. It also generates a sitemap automatically and submits it to Google.

However, I noticed some limitations during testing. URL structures aren't fully customizable, which bothered me. Duplicate content issues can occur with product variants. Blog functionality also feels basic. Advanced SEO work requires apps like Booster SEO or TinyIMG.

Social media integration

Social media platforms like Facebook and Instagram help you sell your products in spaces where your customers are already active. Shopify lets you easily sell via these on one central platform. (Image credit: Shopify)

Connecting Facebook and Instagram took about three minutes. I synced my product catalog and created shoppable posts directly from Shopify.

Orders from social platforms flow into the same dashboard as web orders. The integration supports TikTok, Pinterest, and YouTube Shopping too. But what I missed was native social media scheduling.

Discount and coupon creation

Discounts and coupons can drastically increase sales. However, monitoring and managing them can be tricky. This is where Shopify's dedicated discount tool comes in handy. (Image credit: Shopify)

Creating discounts felt straightforward throughout my testing. I set up percentage discounts, fixed amounts, free shipping, and buy-one-get-one offers. The interface also lets you set start/end dates and usage limits.

You can also create unique codes for specific customers or campaigns. But advanced features like tiered discounts require apps. The native system handles basics well but won't satisfy complex promotional strategies.

Shopify Flow

Shopify Flow takes some time to set up and master, but can automate many repetitive tasks, saving considerable resources in the long run. (Image credit: Shopify)

Shopify Flow was a pleasant surprise for a native automation tool.

I created workflows that trigger based on inventory levels, customer tags, and order values. I set up a workflow that notified me via Slack when inventory dropped below 20 units. It then automatically drafted a purchase order and offered to email my supplier. However, mastering it requires time.

Analytics and reporting

Shopify's analytics give excellent insight into what is and isn't working. Use the data here to shape your strategy for products, marketing, and website improvements. (Image credit: Shopify)

The analytics dashboard provides a clear sales overview.

I could track revenue, traffic sources, and customer behavior at a glance. The real-time data updates helped me make quick decisions during testing. Basic reporting felt adequate, but advanced reports like customer cohorts and forecasting lock behind higher tiers.

Reviewer's experience: Shopify support

Shopify support is comprehensive, but can be a little slow. Our testing found support agents to be knowledgeable enough to answer basic questions, although help for more advanced issues needed to be escalated. (Image credit: Shopify)

Shopify offers 24/7 support via live chat across all plans. Phone support is reserved for Shopify Plus customers. Email responses typically take 2-4 days.

I tested the live chat during my review. The initial wait time was about 14 minutes, despite a 5-minute estimate. Once connected, the agent was polite and helpful, though responses felt somewhat scripted. They resolved my basic question about inventory management but couldn't address a more technical theme-related issue without escalation.

That said, user opinion on support is decidedly mixed.

On Capterra, Shopify scores 4.5/5 from over 6,500 reviews, with many praising ease of use. G2 shows a similar 4.4/5 rating from nearly 4,500 business users. However, Trustpilot tells a different story with a 1.3/5 rating from over 4,000 reviews.

Common complaints include billing disputes, payment holds, and difficulty reaching knowledgeable support staff. Reddit users frequently mention that support quality has declined, with offshore teams providing inconsistent answers and reluctance to escalate issues.

Test results: Shopify

Attribute

Notes

Rating

Value for money

Solid pricing for what you get, but app costs add up quickly. Third-party payment fees hurt margins. Similar entry-level price to other website builder ecommerce plans.

★★★★☆

Ease of use

Intuitive dashboard and setup process. Minimal learning curve for beginners.

★★★★★

Design

Professional themes with decent customization. Limited free options require premium purchases.

★★★★☆

Business tools

Comprehensive POS, inventory, and payment systems. Advanced features need higher plans.

★★★★☆

Marketing tools

Covers basics well but lacks depth. Advanced automation requires third-party solutions.

★★★☆☆

Support

24/7 chat available, but wait times vary. Quality inconsistent based on user feedback.

★★★☆☆

Competitor comparison: Shopify

Below we show you how Shopify compares to BigCommerce and Wix, two of its closest competitors:

Platform

Best for

Our overall rating

Free plan

Paid plans start at

Ease of use

Support

Shopify

Growing online stores

★★★★☆

Trial only

$29.00 USD/month

★★★★☆

Live chat, email, community

BigCommerce

Large product catalogs

★★★★☆

Trial only

$29.00 USD/month

★★★★☆

Live chat, phone, email

Wix

Beginners and hobbyists

★★★★½

Yes

$17.00 USD/month

★★★★★

Live chat, phone, tickets

You can read our Shopify vs BigCommerce comparison to learn more about how the two stack up. To see how it compares to Wix you can check out our Wix vs Shopify guide.

Other options can also be found in our guide to Shopify alternatives.

How we tested Shopify

I built multiple test stores on Shopify to evaluate every aspect of the platform. My hands-on testing covered setup speed, design flexibility, business tools, marketing capabilities, and support quality. I assessed how well Shopify performs for different user types, from solo entrepreneurs to scaling businesses.

At TechRadar, we conduct thorough, real-world testing of every website builder we review. We build actual websites, test features extensively, and compare our findings against marketing claims.

You can read our full guide to how we test website builders to learn more.

Shopify review: FAQsIs Shopify good for beginners?

Yes, Shopify is accessible for beginners, though simpler platforms exist.

You get an intuitive dashboard, guided setup wizard, and drag-and-drop design tools. You don't need coding knowledge to launch a professional store. AI-powered features help generate layouts and content quickly.

However, costs can escalate as you add apps and upgrade plans.

How much does Shopify really cost?

Shopify starts at $29/month when paid annually. However, total costs vary significantly based on your needs.

You'll face transaction fees (2.7% + 30¢ on Basic), app subscriptions, and potentially theme purchases. Third-party payment processors add extra 2% fees. Budget $50-150/month realistically for a functional store with essential apps.

Can I sell on Shopify without inventory?

Yes, Shopify supports dropshipping and print-on-demand business models.

You can connect with suppliers through apps like DSers, Printful, or Spocket. Digital product sales work seamlessly too.

The platform handles order routing to suppliers automatically. This eliminates upfront inventory costs and storage concerns.

Does Shopify take a percentage of sales?

Yes, if you use third-party payment processors, Shopify charges 2% on Basic, 1% on Grow, and 0.6% on Advanced.

Using Shopify Payments eliminates these fees. Standard credit card rates apply: 2.9% + 30¢ on Basic, 2.7% + 30¢ on Grow, and 2.5% + 30¢ on Advanced. The duty calculator adds 0.5% when calculating international taxes.

What are Shopify's biggest limitations?

Shopify's main limitations include limited free themes, restrictive URL structures, and plan-locked features. Basic plans restrict staff accounts severely. Advanced customization requires liquid coding knowledge.

Transaction fees on third-party processors hurt margins. App costs accumulate quickly, inflating monthly expenses beyond base subscription rates.

Is Shopify good for agencies?

Yes, Shopify is one of the best website builders for agencies.

Its robust ecommerce platform offers a wide range of features and customization options, making it suitable for building and managing online stores for clients. Additionally, Shopify's partner program provides agencies with resources and tools to streamline client management and boost their businesses.

Categories: Reviews

Hostinger Website Builder review 2026

Fri, 02/13/2026 - 05:29

Editor's note

Hostinger recently announced that the Zyro website builder is now fully integrated with Hostinger. This integration sees Zyro's user-friendly website building tools and features combined with Hostinger's leading web hosting solutions.

Although all sales and services of Zyro are now discontinued, Zyro clients can continue to manage, edit, and grow their site with the Hostinger website builder.

Hostinger Website Builder is a strong cloud-hosted no-code platform for those looking for an affordable website creation tool.

After testing it against many competitors in our best website builder guide, we found it to be a great value, offering an all-in-one solution similar to Wix or Squarespace, but at a more affordable monthly price.

Plans start at just $2.99/mo (intro rate), well below the entry points of most competing solutions.

We have spent thousands of hours testing over 140 website building platforms, giving us insight into how each platform stacks up against the rest of the market. While Hostinger doesn't fully match the feature set of Wix — our top pick for 2026, it still provides an impressive range of tools at a lower cost.

Read our full Hostinger Website Builder review below to find out how its beginner-friendly UI, AI-driven website creation, and strong ecommerce features make it ideal for both businesses and freelancers. We especially liked the unlimited web pages, free domain registration, and SSL certificates included with all plans, offering great value for budget-conscious users.

Hostinger Website Builder: 2-minute review

Our testing of Hostinger Website Builder shows it is a strong yet affordable choice. The platform stands out with its drag-and-drop editor and AI tools, making it easy for beginners. Plans start at just $2.49/month with our exclusive discount code. This offers great value compared to other website builders.

Hostinger Website Builder is included in all Hostinger web hosting plans, which also include a free domain for a year, 100 email addresses, and SSL certificates for user safety. You can also purchase it as a standalone for $2.99-$3.99 per month.

We found the platform ideal for small businesses, freelancers, and personal sites. It offers over 170 responsive templates across various categories, making it simple to create professional-looking sites fast. While it may not have the extensive features of premium competitors like Wix, Hostinger provides impressive capabilities at a lower cost.

However, there are some limitations. There’s no free plan to test, and you can’t switch templates without starting over. The platform lacks an app marketplace for extra functionality, and many advanced AI tools are only available in the higher-tier plan.

What is Hostinger Website Builder?

Hostinger Website Builder is a user-friendly tool. It allows you to create websites without coding or design skills. Think of it as digital building blocks that you can drag and drop. Unlike complex platforms, Hostinger's builder focuses on simplicity. It uses customizable templates as starting points for your site.

The builder has two main toolbars. They contain everything needed to design and manage your website. You can easily add text, images, buttons, and other elements with simple clicks. For a quicker start, Hostinger offers an AI option. It can generate a website for you in just 2-3 minutes based on your preferences.

What makes Hostinger great for beginners is that it includes everything in one package. You get website building tools, hosting, and even a free domain name. This all-in-one approach removes the technical challenges of connecting different services. Plus, the editor works smoothly on mobile devices. You can update your site from anywhere.

Features

(Image credit: Hostinger Website Builder)

Hostinger Website Builder is a terrific tool for creating personal blogs, professional sites, and online stores without special technical skills. The core of the process is choosing a template and customizing it until you like it. Thanks to Hostinger’s easy-to-use editor this will be an easygoing experience. However, there’s one catch with this - once you choose a template, you can’t switch it without starting all over, and doing this more than once can become awfully annoying awfully quick.

The site builder profits from a clear interface, intuitive layout, and drag-and-drop functionality. The UI is minimalistic, the core options on the left menu are almost self-explanatory, and adding new elements is easy. There are almost no restraints on how can one move content elements around.

Also, its automatically responsive web design can adjust to any screen and look beautiful to boot - computers, tablets, and smartphones alike.

As for ready-made templates, there is a decent amount of them and they are designed to fit different types of sites - online stores, art portfolios, all sorts of blogs, and so on. And if none of them is what you wanted for your site, you can adjust colors, change fonts, and move elements around. Plus, Hostinger provides a royalty-free image library you can browse and borrow any image that catches your eye.

Like with other Hostinger products, its site builder works as an all-in-one sort of solution for creating sites. So, in addition to the site builder and all its tools, the package also includes a domain name registration and a web hosting service with unmetered traffic, and a free SSL certificate. Plus, you can create up to 100 sites and up to 100 domain-based email accounts, if you wish to do so.

If you’re interested in e-commerce features, you’ll be glad to hear that (with the 'Business Website Builder' plan) Hostinger site builder covers all essentials including the ability to accept 20+ payments methods and offering 0% transaction fees.

Tools

(Image credit: Hostinger Website Builder)

Since we’ve pretty much covered standard site-building tools (as well as e-commerce tools) in the previous chapter, we’ll now check out the awesome AI-powered tools this builder has to offer.

Hostinger's advanced AI tools makes it one of the best small business website builders — making it quick and easy for those with little time and budget to get their business online.

If you’re eager to create more content for your site, but don’t have enough time for that, you can employ Hostinger’s AI Writer to do the writing for you. To get things started, choose one of the top-level topics (such as “small business”) and then select a topic-specific category (let’s say gaming). Then, choose what part of your site the AI will be creating this piece of writing for (something like the “About” page), and hit the “Generate” button.

While the AI’s scope currently seems somewhat limited, the paragraph you’ll get will be surpassingly readable - and it will save you the time you could spend on something more critical. Plus, AI Writer is now multilingual, which is excellent news for all non-English speakers out there.

Another interesting AI-powered tool is AI Heatmap and it should help you find out what images will your visitors focus on, even before your site is finished. Moreover, it tries to predict in which way the visitors will navigate around your site and what will attract their attention the most. Then, you can organize the elements of your site in a way it attracts the most visitors and maximizes conversion.

Hostinger has also integrated AI in some smart ways to help online sellers. For example, you can use AI to automatically remove the background from images, making it easier than ever to create professional looking product images. You can also use AI to do bulk product uploads from CSV, drastically cutting the time it takes to get new products online.

Other noteworthy tools from Hostinger’s bag of tricks include Logo Maker (as suggested, it creates catchy logos), Site Analytics (it will get you an insight into who visits your site), PageSpeed Insights (a way to test your site’s speed performance), Business Name Generator (it’s self-explanatory), and Slogan Generator (also, self-explanatory).

Hostinger Reach: Email marketing tool

Last year, Hostinger launched Reach, its dedicated email marketing tool. Built for small businesses and creators, Reach leverages AI to turn your descriptions into a professional, mobile-friendly email to send to your marketing lists. It also includes analytics, GDPR compliance, and email deliverability features. It's free to use, but you'll need to upgrade as your list grows.

Hostinger Horizons: Vibe coding

Those looking to build an interactive website or web app should also check out Hostinger's dedicated vibe coding tool, Horizons.

Hostinger Horizons allows freelancers, solopreneurs, and business owners to launch complex projects without needing to write a single line of code. Simply explain what you want to build using natural language and let Horizons do the coding for you.

The platform integrates seamlessly with payment processors such as Stripe. It also keeps everything, including hosting, domains, and professional email, under one roof, removing friction.

User reviews

(Image credit: Hostinger Website Builder)

Since its launch in October 2022, Hostinger’s website builder has attracted a modest user base, many of whom have shared their observations and opinions about the product on popular review sites. Some of the sites we’ve closely checked include Trustpilot, HostAdvice, Reviews.io, and TrustRadius.

Since most user reviews are focused on web hosting services, though, we had to get our hands dirty digging through these reviews to find what users think about the new site builder.

Hostinger boasts a 4.7/5 rating on Trustpilot, 4.6/5 on HostAdvice, and 4.7/5 on WPBeginner. But these don't all reflect customer perception of their website builder, since it also includes their hosting services. So we’ve checked the latest user reviews that bring up Hostinger Website Builder to see how it holds up.

On Trustpilot, users have criticized the process of transferring their sites to the new site builder as it was slow, required users to rebuild their sites, and had to wait for a day before the sites appeared on the internet. However, most users found the site builder simple to use, swift, and of big help.

User reviews on HostAdvice paint a similar picture by calling Hostinger Website Builder useful but somewhat slow and lacking in more complex editing options. On Reviews.io no one pointed out the site builder, but the rating of Hostinger’s overall service was a rock-solid 4.4/5.

TrustRadius rated Hostinger with 7.4 out of 10, which is uncharacteristically low compared to other platforms.

But user reviews suggest that most users are pleased with Hostinger’s new website builder overall. Complaints were mostly directed towards its speed and lack of more complex image editing options — but that’s it.

Ease of use

(Image credit: Hostinger Website Builder)

The short answer is yes, it is. However, Hostinger Website Builder is not only easy to use but it’s one of the most beginner-friendly site-building tools out there. After all, it was created to address the needs of less tech-savvy Hostinger users.

Building a site with WordPress calls for some technical know-how (or tons of tutorials).

Even if you’re an experienced professional user, a beginner-friendly site builder can help your less-experienced teammates get used to the new tool and speed up the workflow.

The site builder’s drag-and-drop, grid-based editor will make adding text, images, videos, maps, contact forms, and other elements to your site effortless. There’s also an icon that lets you clone the whole section, which can significantly speed up things. And if your site doesn’t turn out exactly as expected, there’s an easy-to-spot “Undo” icon that’ll return your site to its prior state.

And if by a stroke of bad luck, a thunderstorm causes a power outage or you turn off your computer by accident, thanks to Hostinger’s autosaving functionality you won’t lose your cherished content - and this autosaving is activated every couple of seconds.

As mentioned above, Hostinger offers a royalty-free image library, so you can stop worrying about where you’ll find fitting images for your site. While only one image can be uploaded at a time, all of them will be saved in your image library from where you can choose the ones to use, edit, or delete.

To tell the truth, we weren’t exactly impressed with the site builder’s edition options. While the site builder offers more image edition options than the old one, it still isn’t much. You can add/remove backgrounds, resize, crop, and upscale an image, and that's about it.

So, our only complaint about Hostinger Website Builder is that its image editor is a bit too basic. Even so, this tool is probably as user-friendly as one can get.

Pricing

(Image credit: Hostinger Website Builder)

Plan

Introductory offer (48 months)

With our exclusive promo code*

Renewal rate

Premium

$2.99/mo

$2.69/mo

$11.99

Business

$3.99/mo

$3.59/mo

$13.99

* You can use the code TECHRADAR at checkout to save 10% off on top of the introductory rate. You can also check out our Hostinger promo codes to find more deals.

Pricing and plans explained

Hostinger Website Builder comes in two package options, making it simple to find a plan that works for you.

Premium Website Builder offers you everything you need to build one website with up to five pages, including an AI website builder, plenty of templates, and a free domain for one year. It starts at $2.99/mo for a 4-year sign-up, but increases to $11.99/mo after that.

More serious users will need the Business Website Builder plan. This unlocks unlimited pages and up to 50 websites, as well as ecommerce features and a bunch of helpful AI tools. This plan starts at $3.99/mo for a 4-year sign-up, then jumps to $13.99/mo after that.

All Hostinger’s web hosting and website builder plans are backed by a 30-day money-back guarantee, which means you can try out everything before making a long-term commitment. Hostinger also offers 3 months for free when purchasing 48-month plans. There is no free-forever plan.

As for payment methods, Hostinger accepts all major credit/debit cards, PayPal, Google Pay, AliPay, and Coingate.

So, does Hostinger Website Builder provide good value for money? Yes, particularly if you subscribe for a longer period.

Security

(Image credit: Hostinger Website Builder)

With cybercrime on the rise, site owners need to stay very vigilant to keep their sites on the safe side of the internet. A smart place to start is to make sure your service provider is equipped with all the security tools you’ll need to shield your site and its visitors from all sorts of threats. Fortunately for all Hostinger customers, the company takes the security of its products and services very seriously.

For starters, Hostinger provides a free Let’s Encrypt SSL certificate with all its plans, which adds another layer of security to all data being shared through your site.

With Hostinger you can set up Cloudflare which will conceal all server IP addresses and shield your site against distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks.

All Hostinger’s plans come with weekly backups, which means you can turn back time in case you mess up your site or something goes wrong. If automatic weekly backups aren’t enough for you, you can always go with a business-focused plan and get daily backups instead.

Also, Hostinger supports two-factor authentication (2FA), so you can be sure all your logins are done by you. So, even if someone steals your login credentials, they won’t be able to access your Hostinger account.

Instead of a conclusion, we’ll also add that Hostinger guarantees 99.9% uptime with all its web hosting services, and this is the available uptime per month. If your site suffers more downtime than this, you can contact the customer support staff and request a credit of 5% off your monthly hosting fee for that month.

All in all, Hostinger Website Builder seems like a solid choice in terms of security.

Customer support

(Image credit: Hostinger Website Builder)

With all Hostinger's plans (website builder & web hosting included), customers can rely on round-the-clock live chat, e-mail, and ticket support. However, a telephone line is not available at this time.

Live chat support is probably your best bet out of the direct support channels and you shouldn’t wait for more than a couple of minutes before getting a reply from a support agent.

All do-it-yourself types of users will be thankful for Hostinger's well-supplied Help Center. There, you’ll find both the basic, beginner-oriented web hosting and site-building stuff and tips on mastering marketing and boosting your business strategy. Most how-tos are written in a simple-to-understand way and feature fitting screenshots to boot - so, getting lost is not an option.

However, we suggest browsing through the categories rather than utilizing the search box since it’s astonishingly awful at finding the right articles - strange, it’s usually the other way around.

All things considered, Hostinger hits the marks in all areas when it comes to customer support and it offers more options than most budget-friendly providers.

Alternatives

As a website builder, Hostinger stands out mainly as an affordable and easy-to-use option. It offers good value without confusing users with complex features. We believe it would work best for individuals, freelancers, and small businesses who need a professional-looking website without high costs or a steep learning curve. The platform shines for those creating simple business sites, portfolios, or small online stores with up to 500 products.

Wix is the market leader and our top choice for 2026. It provides more advanced features and design flexibility than Hostinger, but at a much higher price. WordPress offers greater customization and scalability for larger sites, but it can be daunting for beginners. For those focused on ecommerce, Shopify offers specialized selling tools, though at premium prices.

When comparing hosting services that provide website builders, Hostinger competes with Bluehost in the WordPress hosting market. Hostinger has captured a large market share (58.95%) in this area, making it a value leader. For users who want affordability without losing essential features, Hostinger Website Builder is an excellent starting point for building an online presence without the technical challenges of more complex platforms.

Hostinger AI WordPress website builder

Hostinger offers a slightly different version of its website builder for those looking to build their site on the WordPress CMS. Put simply, the Hostinger AI WordPress Website Builder allows users to build a full website template, complete with text and images that will be hosted by Hostinger, but managed via WordPress.

(Image credit: Hostinger)

You start the journey by telling the AI website builder a little about the site you are looking to build, including your brand name, website type, and a description of the website you are looking to create. The website builder then takes that information and uses it to create a website for you.

Of course, like with all AI website builders, you will need to do at least some editing to make your site worthy of representing your brand online, but it does give you a great starting place.

This is a great alternative to WordPress’s built in website builder, Gutenberg. We did a full comparison of the two platforms in our Hostinger AI WordPress website builder vs WordPress.com guide.

Hostinger website builder review: Summary

Hostinger Website Builder is an AI-powered, all-in-one sort of solution aimed at newcomers and less experienced users that plan to create a personal blog, a pretty-looking portfolio, or a small online store.

The templates are beautiful yet simple, the editor is easy to use (but a bit too basic), and the price tag is pretty pocket-friendly. Plus, a free SSL certificate, royalty-free image library, ecommerce features, AI tools, and 24/7 live chat support will only sweeten the deal. It’s one of the best beginner-friendly options out there.

Hostinger Website Builder review: FAQsDoes Hostinger have a free website builder?

While Hostinger provides a free Hostinger Website Builder with all its web hosting plans (even the cheapest one), there isn’t a free edition of this product - nor a free trial for that matter. Besides this, there is a one-and-only site builder plan and it is backed by a 30-day money-back guarantee.

Is Hostinger website builder secure?

Yes, Hostinger is considered one of the most secure website builders on the market.

All Hostinger sites come with a free Let’s Encrypt SSL certificate. The platform also allows you to set up Cloudflare, which can conceal all server IP addresses and protect you against DDoS attaches.

All plans also come with weekly backups, making it easy to jump back in time if anything goes wrong with your site. Alternatively, if you upgrade your plan you can get access to daily backups.

Can I migrate my website to Hostinger’s website builder?

Hostinger website builder offers a tool that allows you to migrate websites directly into its platform. This can be incredibly helpful, but only if you have the original files. However, in many circumstances you will not be able to access what you need to complete a seamless migration.

Other website builders such as Wix and Squarespace will not typically allow you to download your website files, making it impossible to then upload those files onto Hostinger’s website builder.

When our Website Builder Editor, Owain Williams, moved his website from Wix to Hostinger he had to build his site from scratch.

Which is best: Hostinger vs Zyro?

Hostinger Website Builder is an upgraded, feature-rich, AI-powered, rookie-oriented version of Zyro, so we think it’s an improved edition of the site builder. If you were a fan of Zyro, you’ll probably like it as much under the new name.

What payment type does Hostinger Website Builder support?

The online payments platform you can utilize in your online store with Hostinger Website Builder is Stripe and it supports several payment methods. These include all major credit/debit cards (including Visa, Mastercard, and American Express), Apple Pay, Google Pay, Alipay, Afterpay/Clearpay, Bancontact, BLIK, and the list goes on.

We should note that the only payment method available by default is bank cards, while the other methods will have to be enabled. They’re all integrated though.

Categories: Reviews

'I cannot think of a single meaningful downside:' I tested Wharfedale's new Diamond 12.1i stereo speakers, and they're as good as things get for this price

Thu, 02/12/2026 - 17:00

Wharfedale Diamond 12.1i: One-minute review

The Wharfedale Diamond 12i standmount speakers are the latest in the line of 'Diamond' speakers that has, one way and another, been around since 1982. The most recent (and wildly acclaimed) series, the Diamond 12, launched back in 2020 – so it’s about time the Diamond 12i range made an appearance.

(Obviously not everyone loves a ‘13’ name, and Wharfedale is open enough to acknowledge that this new range of loudspeakers is not a ground-up redesign of the range it’s replacing - so ‘12i’ it is.)

The Wharfedale Diamond 12.1i tested here is a two-way bookshelf (or, more accurately, standmount – I'll come back to this) design that sells for the same £249 that the outgoing Diamond 12.1 launched at – which does, of course, mean it’s less expensive in real terms. It's not a situation that occurs all that often with the sort of hi-fi equipment I deal with. In the US, the new model costs $499, and in Australia it's AU$699.

But if you think Wharfedale has cut corners to get the Diamond 12.1i to market at this very aggressive price, think again. Build quality is more than acceptable. The trio of available finishes look (and even feel) good. Best of all, though, is the way the Diamond 12.1i sound. They’re perfectly OK at lower volumes – but let them loose even just a little and they really come to life, combining insight, balanced, dynamic potency and simple entertainment to periodically thrilling effect.

The specification (with highlights including a 25mm woven polyester tweeter, a 130mm mid/bass driver made from mica-enhanced polypropylene, a carefully tuned rear-facing bass reflex port, and some very judicious cabinet bracing), results in a speaker that’s easy to drive and has a frequency response of 65Hz - 20kHz.

The front baffle of each Wharfedale features the tweeter positioned behind a minimal waveguide – the idea is to expose the driver as much as possible in an effort to achieve wide dispersion. Below here is the 130mm ‘Klarity’ mid/bass driver, backed by a substantial magnet with an aluminum compensation ring, with a voice coil that’s wound on a glass-fibre/epoxy resin bobbin.

The crossover between the two drivers is positioned at a sensible 2.6kHz, and is performed by a Linkwitz-Riley network featuring air-core inductors – it has been specified with minimal phase-shift and smooth integration in mind.

Wharfedale’s description of the Diamond 12.1i as a ‘bookshelf’ speaker is, I think, just a little bit naughty. Yes, you may have a bookshelf big enough to accommodate the cabinet’s 250mm depth (which rises to 280mm once you include the speaker binding posts, and more if your speaker cable is terminated with plugs) – but when you factor in the breathing space the rear-facing reflex port needs, even the deepest shelf is unlikely offer the breathing space the Wharfedale require. Let’s just go with ‘standmount’ and leave it at that, shall we?

At 312 x 180 x 250(ish)mm (HxWxD) the Diamond 12.1i are tidily proportioned for standmounts, and the standard of build and finish is more than good enough to justify the asking price. Both of the available colors (‘deep’ black and ‘stone’ grey) are in a kind of semi-matt finish that looks nice (to me, at least), isn’t all that reflective and is actually slightly soft to the touch. Your other option is ‘classic’ walnut, and I will have to reserve judgment on its qualities as I have yet to see (or feel) it.

Each of the finishes is supplied with magnetically attached, full-length grilles finished in black fabric – it certainly makes for a clean look, but I feel it’s a shame to hide the mildly shiny driver surrounds and clean overall appearance. You may feel differently.

On the inside, the Diamond 12.1i feature minimal and carefully targeted ‘spot’ bracing designed to keep both resonance and resonance transfer to a minimum. In conjunction with cabinet walls of varying thickness, plus the resonant properties of the glue holding everything together taken into account, this is a slightly more sophisticated piece of engineering and design than the asking price might lead you to believe.

Some loudspeakers don’t alter their character no matter the volume level you’re listening at. The Wharfedale Diamond 12.1.i don’t undergo drastic volume-related changes, I must emphasize – but at very modest volume levels they can sound just a little matter-of-fact. All you need to do is nudge the level north just a little, though, and these speakers come bounding to life – and then they reveal themselves to be one of the very best budget options around.

Get a Tidal-derived stream of Zaho de Sagazan’s version of Modern Love playing as a 24bit/44.1kHz FLAC file, for instance, and you’ll find out exactly what’s what. The Diamond 12.1i are a direct and spirited listen, with an uncomplicatedly upfront sonic signature and an almost palpable enthusiasm for the recording.

Low frequencies are respectably deep, and nicely controlled where attack and decay is concerned, with knock-on effects to the rhythmic expression and momentum that are entirely positive.

Detail levels are impressive, too, so there’s plenty of variation where tone and texture are concerned to go along with the straight-ahead punch. Transition into the midrange is clean, and once there the Wharfedale demonstrate a similarly insightful and animated attitude – the details of attitude and character in the voice are just as readily available as those regarding phrasing and technique.

At the top of the frequency range, the Diamond 12.1i have quite sensibly decided that discretion is the better part of valor, staying relatively constrained in the mix – but although the highest rebel sounds are dialed down just a little, there’s still no shortage of bite or the overall enthusiasm for attack.

With the discretion at the very top of the frequency range borne in mind, the frequency response here is nicely even and even-handed – and while the overall tonality has a nice little suggestion of heat to it, it’s not even close to becoming overcooked.

The attention to detail the speakers pay extends to the most transient or fleeting harmonic variation, and there’s a respectable amount of dynamic headroom available for when the tune shifts through the ‘volume and intensity’ gears.

Soundstaging is convincing, and the Diamond 12i are able to escape the confines of their cabinets, just a little, in every direction. The layout of the stage is plain, and while the Diamond 12.1i manage to give every participant on it just a little breathing space they’re capable of offering a sense of unity and togetherness at the same time.

The Wharfedale seem in no way demanding of their partnering equipment, either – they don’t get flustered by sitting at the end of a disproportionately expensive system, and they don’t seem to mind being driven by some standard all-in-one electronics costing less than they do. There are qualitative differences, of course – but broadly speaking the Diamond 12.1i are easy-going and adaptable.

Bear in mind that the Diamond 12.1i, just like every other pair of passive loudspeakers, needs a degree of ‘running in’ before they sound how they are intended to sound – certainly you should ensure they have quite a few hours on the clock before you judge them.

The entry-level in passive loudspeakers has enjoyed a very successful decade so far – and this is in no small part thanks to Wharfedale’s efforts. Yes, the company has inspired some very credible rivals to take this area of the market properly seriously (I’m thinking particularly of the excellent Dali Kupid), but there’s just no getting around the fact the Diamond 12.1i offer prodigious value for money in every respect.

They look and feel more expensive than they are, and once they’re properly positioned they sound it too. Unless you’re been suckered in by the promise of an actually bookshelf-friendly design, I cannot think of a single meaningful downside to Wharfedale Diamond 12.1i ownership.

Wharfedale Diamond 12.1i review: Price & release date

Launched in December 2025
Priced at $499 / £249 / AU$699

The new Wharfedale Diamond 12i range of entry-level loudspeakers launched in December of 2025. This 12.1i model is, at £249 in the UK, the second-least-expensive of the five-strong newest Diamond range of stereo speakers. In the United States it sells for $499, while in Australia the going rate is AU$699.

This compares very favorably to options from the likes of Dali, Monitor Audio or Q Acoustics.

Should I buy the Wharfedale Diamond 12.1i?Wharfedale Diamond 12.1i score card

Attributes

Notes

Score

Features

Obviously very limited, being passive speakers, but great driver setup.

5 / 5

Sound quality

Punchy and rapid low-frequency response meets detail and positivity across the range – but best if the volume isn't too low.

5 / 5

Design

Lovely finishes and build quality – but just know they're bigger than you might expect from 'bookshelf' speakers.

5 / 5

Usability and setup

Ideal passive speakers – plug in and go! And they're not fussy about what drives them.

5 / 5

Value

As good as speakers at this price get.

5 / 5

Buy them if…

You’re setting out on your ‘authentic hifi’ journey
Once you hear what a modestly priced pair of speakers designed and built by a specialist can do, you’ll be locked in for life.View Deal

You’re after good looks as well as good sound
The Diamond 12.1i look and feel good, especially in the ‘stone’ gray of my review sample.View Deal

You have a half-decent micro-system that deserves a new lease on life
You might think the speakers that came with your nice little Denon all-in-one are good enough. Wharfedale begs to differ…View Deal

Don't buy them if…

Your bookshelf is only the size of a bookshelf
These are slightly larger cabinets than the description ‘bookshelf’ rather optimistically implies.View Deal

You want to fill an especially large room with sound
There is, of course, a limit to what an affordable pair of speakers fitted with fairly small drivers can do in terms of outright scale.View Deal

You prefer to listen at quite low volumes
The Diamond 12.1i are perfectly OK at low levels, but really come to life if you wind the volume up just a little.View Deal

Wharfedale Diamond 12.1i review: Also consider

Dali Kupid
The Dali Kupid seem to offer a little less (in physical terms) than the Diamond 12.1i while costing a little more – but they’re an energetic, punchy and entertaining listen and can actually comfortably fit on a bookshelf. They’re not quite as easy to drive as the Wharfedale, though. Here's our full Dali Kupid review.View Deal

Q Acoustics 3020c
These are not much more expensive than the Wharfedale these days, and they’re a great-sounding pair of speakers for the money. The cabinet is notably deep, though, so they’re even less of a bookshelf proposition than the Diamond 12.1i. Here's our full Q Acoustics 3020c review.View Deal

How I tested the Wharfedale Diamond 12.1i

I positioned the speakers on a pair of Custom Design speaker stands in my home and usual speaker testing room, and connected them to a Naim Uniti Star and also an A&R Cambridge A60 for amplification.

Sources of music were the Naim (as a network streamer), a Rega Apollo CD player and a Technics SL-100G (with a Goldring 1042 cartridge and pre-amplified by a Chord Huei) as a turntable. So I was able to listen to music from lots of different formats, and of various styles and genres.

Read TechRadar's reviews guarantee
First reviewed: February 2026

Categories: Reviews

Main menu

Error message

Technology

Navigation

News

Reviews

New forum topics

AI just made my favorite Skullcandy earbuds worse — and I’m not sure anyone asked for it

Amazfit Balance 2 review: An outstanding fitness tracker, but so-so smart features

I had high hopes for this cheap, well-designed vlogging camera – but then I reviewed the footage

Ashampoo Movie Studio Pro 3 video editing software review

Affinity by Canva (2026) review: Three design tools in one, all for free - but is the software an Adobe-killer?

I became a master of stealth in Styx: Blades of Greed and finished my playthrough with hundreds of guards kicked off cliffs, countless coins pilfered, and a full arsenal of magical abilities

The Fractal Scape has no business offering this many features for a wireless headset at this price

I've spent 18 hours taking down Big Pharma in High On Life 2, and it's exactly what a sequel should be

Optery data removal service review

GoDaddy website builder review 2026

I tested the Miofive Mirror 1 for a month – it’s the 4K dash cam could replace your rearview mirror (if it fits)

Sick of charging your Apple Watch every day? The Coros Pace 4 offers up to 19 days of battery, and costs less than an SE 3

The Mortuary Assistant is my top Shudder recommendation in February - here's why I liked it so much

I reviewed the Eversolo DAC-Z10, and this DAC/preamp/headphone amp combo reveals details you didn't know were in your music

Acer Veriton GN100 AI mini PC workstation - another AI development system using the same Nvidia Grace Blackwell foundations

I tested the Viltrox 85mm f/1.4 Pro for two months — here's why this classic portrait lens beats pricey first-party glass

I flew the world’s lightest bi-copter drone, and it’s the most fun I’ve had outside of FPV drones – but there's a catch

Shopify review 2026

Hostinger Website Builder review 2026

'I cannot think of a single meaningful downside:' I tested Wharfedale's new Diamond 12.1i stereo speakers, and they're as good as things get for this price

Pages

Main menu

Error message

Technology

You are here

Navigation

News

TechRadar Reviews

Reviews

New forum topics

Pages

Search form

User login