TechRadar Reviews

Hisense U75QG: Two-minute review

The Hisense U75QG is a solid performer that packs a lot of features in for the price. Typically, flagship TVs are the ones that get the most attention, but people usually aren’t buying the best of the best from any brand. Instead, buying considerations usually fall to midrange TVs like this one.

The Hisense U75QG is a mini-LED display that delivers brightness we generally don’t see from TVs in this price range – I measured over 3,000 nits in HDR Filmmaker Mode, a level that exceeds many of the best TVs from most manufacturers. That makes the U7 an excellent choice for bright spaces where ambient light is difficult to control, such as a living room with large picture windows.

Accuracy with SDR sources is impressive, so while watching broadcast TV or non-HDR streamed shows, the U75QG will deliver nice, accurate colors. HDR has a few issues in color temperature and accuracy, but they’re not drastic enough to distract and pull you out of the viewing experience. They can also be mostly corrected with a professional calibration, if you’re up for spending extra for that.

The U75QG’s Google TV OS is, as expected, quick to use and easy to navigate. Google has been the top built-in smart TV platform for a few years now, and Hisense uses it well. Picture adjustments are easy to find and change, especially with a Settings button on the backlit remote, and the Google Store offers hundreds of apps for download, including all the major streamers and smaller ones as well. And for those that want over-the-air broadcasts, the U75QG includes a built-in ATSC 3.0 tuner.

The Hisense has great gaming support, with the ability for high refresh rate up to 165Hz on all four HDMI 2.1 ports, with VRR and AMD FreeSync Premium, Dolby Vision gaming, and a game bar to easily access gaming settings. There are some issues with image smearing when using VRR that can detract a little, but casual gamers should be more than happy with the features and performance.

Hisense TVs always see an almost immediate dip in pricing after release, and the same has happened with the U75QG. Those discounts make it an even better value, and it stacks up well against the TCL QM7K – its primary competitor. When everything is taken into account, the Hisense U75QG stands as one of the best value midrange TVs I’ve seen in 2025.

Hisense U75QG review: Price and release date

The Hisense U75QG's picture is bright enough to even watch in well-lit rooms (Image credit: Future)

• Release date: May 2025
• 55-inch: $1,300
• 65-inch: $1,500
• 75-inch: $1,999
• 85-inch: $2,499
• 100-inch: $4,999
• 116-inch: $21,999

The U75QG is Hisense’s midrange mini-LED TV, falling between the Hisense U8QG and U65QF (a model that uses the Amazon Fire TV OS) in its lineup. The series ranges in size from a 55-inch to a massive 116-inch model – the largest Hisense mini-LED TV available. As is typical for Hisense TVs, prices for all models, apart from the 116-inch, have fallen significantly since the series was released in May. The 55-inch TV can now be found for as little as $698, with prices ranging to just under $3,000 for the 100-inch.

The U75QG pricing is similar to the TCL QM7K, the midrange competitor from that manufacturer. Although the Hisense is currently $100 to $700 more expensive than the TCL, depending on screen size.

Hisense U75QG review: Specs

Screen type:

QLED with mini-LED

Refresh rate:

Up to 144Hz

HDR support:

Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, HDR10+, HDR10+ Adaptive, HLG

Audio support:

Dolby Atmos, DTS Virtual:X

Smart TV:

Google TV

HDMI ports:

4 x HDMI 2.1

Built-in tuner:

ATSC 3.0

Hisense U75QG review: Benchmark resultsHisense U75QG review: FeaturesImage 1 of 2

The U75QG's ports are split between side-mounted and rear-mounted input sections (Image credit: Future)Image 2 of 2

(Image credit: Future)

• Dolby Vision and HDR10+ support
• Hi-View AI Engine Pro processor
• VA panel with good anti-reflection

The U75QG is a mini-LED TV with an anti-reflection VA panel, which does a great job handling ambient room light reflections. The VA panel does not provide it with wide viewing angles, however, with desaturated colors and raised black levels easily visible starting at around 30 degrees off-center.

Hisense upgraded last year’s Hi-View Engine Pro found in the U7N to the Hi-View AI Engine Pro, which is the same processor the company is using in its step-up U8QG model. Hisense claims improved performance over the previous chip with a 1.6x faster CPU, 2.2x faster GPU, and 1.5x faster NPU, all to deliver a better optimized image.

The Hisense U75QG includes wide-ranging HDR support, including both Dolby Vision and HDR10+ dynamic formats. Dolby Vision IQ and HDR10+ Adaptive modes use the TV’s processing power to automatically adjust the picture based on the ambient light viewing conditions in your room. Dolby Vision Gaming is included, and, of course, the TV supports HDR10 and HLG.

Console and PC gamers will be happy with the included features on the U75QG. All four HDMI 2.1 ports support a refresh rate up to 165Hz with a Game Booster 288Hz (at 1080p), VRR, AMD FreeSync Premium Pro, Hisense Game Bar, and the aforementioned HDR gaming modes. Although, as we’ll get into below, there are some minor clarity issues with gaming on the U75QG.

The U75QG runs the Google TV OS, which allows access to thousands of streaming apps. It also has an ATSC 3.0 tuner for those in areas that are broadcasting NextGen TV signals.

• Features Score: 4/5

Hisense U75QG review: Picture quality

The U75QG's picture displays good color accuracy (Image credit: Future)

• Incredibly bright for a midrange TV
• Impressive SDR color accuracy
• HDR benefits from a pro calibration

Hisense has been a leader over the past few years in pushing display brightness to its limits, so there’s no surprise that the U75QG gets nice and bright, especially for a midrange TV. With local dimming and peak brightness set to High, and using Portrait Displays’ Calman color calibration software, in Filmmaker Mode from a 10% window, the Hisense blasts out 3,126 nits. That’s more than double what its predecessor, the Hisense U7N, was capable of, and more than the flagship Sony Bravia 9 mini-LED TV. A fullscreen white measurement tops out at 780 nits.

With local dimming on, the Hisense also delivers deep blacks even when there are some bright images on screen. During starfield shots — the opening of Star Wars: The Last Jedi or many scenes in Gravity — there’s excellent separation between the stars, especially for a mid-tier mini-LED TV, and there isn’t a significant amount of blooming along the edges of the Shuttle Explorer against the darkness of space. When bright objects are moving, the blooming is exacerbated a little bit, but overall performance is still great for the price of the TV.

Measurements in Filmmaker Mode out of the box show the U75QG tracks the target EOTF (gamma for HDR) beautifully, so the TV isn’t overbrightening the midtones at all. HDR color accuracy also leaves a little to be desired, with things like grass being a little yellow and skin tones slightly undersaturated. None of this takes away from the overall enjoyment of a movie or TV show, though.

The U75QG excels with SDR content. Grayscale tracks D65 across the range incredibly well, with an average dE of 0.8 and 2.4 gamma. Colors are also impressively accurate for a midrange TV, with skin tones in particular looking exactly as they should.

It’s possible to get similar performance with HDR content. The U75QG has an autocal feature in Calman, the software TechRadar uses to measure TVs, so the TV can be easily calibrated within just a few minutes by a TV calibration professional. And after calibration, the TV’s accuracy is significantly better. Some color temperature issues remain in brighter grays, but if you’re able to make it happen, a calibration is worth it to get the most out of the U75QG.

• Picture quality score: 4/5

Hisense U75QG review: Sound quality

A rear-mounted subwoofer adds some low-end heft to the U75QG's sound (Image credit: Future)

• 2.1.2-channel speaker system
• Clear dialogue
• Would benefit from a soundbar

The back of the U75QG features an oval subwoofer, part of the TV’s 2.1.2-channel speaker system. Along its edges are speakers to handle the left and right channels, as well as two up-firing speakers for height. In my room, I didn’t find that the up-firing speakers accomplished much, and there isn’t a room calibration system to make them work better.

Overall sound performance is above average for a TV. There’s a decent amount of bass and vocal clarity is good, but it’s still worth pairing the TV with one of the best soundbars for a more immersive experience.

• Sound quality score: 3.5/5

Hisense U75QG review: Design

The U75QG's "pedestal stand" is actually two support feet with a plastic plate mounted on top (Image credit: Future)

• Center pedestal is really two feet with a plastic plate
• High enough lift for soundbar
• Backlit remote control

The Hisense U75QG has a slightly redesigned stand over last year’s U7N. It still utilizes a center pedestal, but instead of a trapezoidal design, the U75QG consists of two feet that are covered by a rectangular plastic plate. The TV feels sturdy on its stand, although the plastic cover is a bit flimsy – which is honestly to be expected at this price point.

While the stand lifts the TV a little over three inches to accommodate a soundbar, the front sticks out a bit, so some extra space on your credenza or table will be needed to put the soundbar in front of it. The 100- and 116-inch models use two separated legs instead of the pedestal base.

The TV is a bit on the thick side, and more so than the comparable TCL QM7K by about half an inch. Connections are split between two panels. The majority are side-facing — including four 165Hz-capable HDMI 2.1 ports (one eARC), the ATSC 3.0 coax inputs, a USB 3.0 port, a 3.5 mm audio out, and an AV in (which requires an adapter). An additional USB 2.0 port, optical digital audio out, and Ethernet port are in a rear-facing cutout. If you plan to use wired Ethernet and wall-mount the TV, this could cause some mounting issues and require the TV to be slightly out from the wall to keep the Ethernet cable from bending and putting stress on the connection. The U75QG supports a Wi-Fi 6E wireless connection as well.

The remote is the same as the one that was introduced with 2024 Hisense TVs. It’s a long silver handset with backlit buttons, which include settings and input buttons (these are sadly absent from some competitors’ remotes). Because of its length, reaching all the buttons – at least for my average-sized hand – required some jostling of the remote, but overall the design is comfortable and easy to use.

• Design score: 4/5

Hisense U75QG review: Smart TV and menus

The U75QG's Google TV smart interface (Image credit: Future)

• Google TV OS
• Loads of streaming apps available
• Some ads on the home page

Google TV is the OS of choice for the U7 series, and it runs well on the TV. The OS is one of the best built-in options when it comes to the combination of usability and streaming app support. On the U75QG, home page navigation is quick, and menus are intuitive. There are thousands of apps available for download – including the major streaming ones such as Netflix, Prime Video, and Apple TV – as well as more niche options not included on all platforms, like F1 TV and Dropout.

The gear button on the remote pulls up the menus for adjusting any TV settings. There’s a selection of quick access menus for things like Picture and Sound, or you can call up the full settings menu. It’s pretty easy to navigate and find what you’re looking for — different settings are sensibly placed instead of hidden under a multitude of submenus.

• Smart TV & menus score: 4/5

Hisense U75QG review: Gaming

Hisense's Game Bar onscreen menu (Image credit: Future)

• Four HDMI 2.1 ports with 165Hz support
• 9.8ms input lag time
• FreeSync Premium Pro

The TV has lots of features meant to satisfy gamers, and for the most part, gamers will be happy with the U75QG. The four HDMI 2.1 inputs accept high refresh rate signals up to 165Hz from a computer in 4K, and Game Booster allows for 1080p/288Hz gaming. Consoles will be able to play games at 120Hz with VRR (including HDMI Forum VRR, AMD FreeSync Premium Pro, and G-Sync compatibility) and Dolby Vision gaming.

The U75QG has the Hisense Game Bar, where adjustments can quickly be made to settings like Dark Detail, Brightness, the Game Genre, and for adding a crosshair for aiming. It also displays your current frame rate, HDR, VRR, and ALLM status.

When in Game/PC picture mode, the input lag on the U75QG with a 4K 60Hz signal is a very low 9.8ms. It’s excellent for gamers who regularly play against others, or for reaction-based games. I played a good amount of Clair Obscur: Expedition 33, which requires some button timing for dodges and parries, and didn’t feel any lag.

While I found gaming on the U75QG to be an overall good experience, there’s some smearing when VRR is on, particularly with bright objects across a darker background, that can be a bit distracting. I saw this more when using my PC (from an RTX 4070 Ti Super) than on console, so if you’re a PC gamer, you might also see this more.

• Gaming score: 4/5

Hisense U75QG review: Value

The U75QG's backlit remote control (Image credit: Future)

• Excellent picture quality for the price
• Really needs a soundbar for best experience
• Four HDMI 2.1 ports and backlit remote

Hisense has been delivering significant value from its televisions for years now, and that continues with the U75QG, which might deliver the best performance-to-price ratio of any Hisense TV. Hisense historically lowers its TV pricing after release by a good bit, and the TVs are always on sale during shopping events, so that increases its value proposition even further.

The midrange TV market is fierce, though. The U75QG’s primary competitor is the TCL QM7K, another solid performer with high value. It’s not nearly as bright as the Hisense, and it also has some HDR inaccuracies (overly blue grayscale and some color issues) out of the box. Only two of the TCL’s HDMI ports are version 2.1, as well, although I prefer its overall design.

It gets interesting when we compare against the next tier up. The TCL QM8K has had some deep discounts recently, putting it within a couple of hundred dollars of the Hisense. At that price, the TCL is an absolute steal. Not only is it a much better TV than both the U75QG and QM7K, I think it's one of the best TCL TVs ever made – although the TCL QM9K likely takes that title.

• Value score: 4.5/5

Should I buy the Hisense U75QG?

(Image credit: Future)Hisense U75QG

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Features

Good HDR support and gaming features

4/5

Picture quality

Excellent brightness and great overall picture quality for the price

4/5

Sound quality

2.1.2-channel speakers deliver clear dialogue but limited height effects with Atmos soundtracks

3.5/5

Design

Good overall design with backlit remote and plentiful connections

4/5

Smart TV and menus

Google TV is a solid smart interface with plenty of apps

4/5

Gaming

Four HDMI 2.1 ports with 4K 165Hz support but some picture smearing with VRR, particularly with PCs

4/5

Value

A great overall value given the TV's picture quality and features

4.5/5

Buy it if...

You want a good all-around TV
While the U75QG isn’t without flaws, its overall performance is impressive for the price.

Your TV room is bathed in ambient light
Brightness output from the Hisense is more than other comparable TVs and stands up well against uncontrollable ambient light.

You have multiple gaming consoles/PCs
The Hisense U75QG has four HDMI 2.1 165Hz-compatible inputs, while its main competitor, the TCL QM7K, only has two. If you have multiple consoles and a PC to connect, the U75QG is the pick.

Don't buy it if…

You’re looking for top-tier gaming performance
The U75QG has decent gaming performance and a nice game bar option, but its VRR performance doesn’t match competitors.

You want amazing sound from a TV
The sound performance is okay, but you’ll really want to add a soundbar for a better sonic experience.

You watch events with big groups
Picture quality degrades pretty quickly as you move from off from center screen, so any friends that are over and have to sit to the side will see a lower-quality image.

Also consider...

Hisense U75QG

TCL QM7K

Hisense U8QG

Samsung QN90F

Price (65-inch)

$1,500

$1,499

$2,199

$2,499

Screen type

mini-LED w/ QLED

mini-LED w/ QLED

mini-LED w/ QLED

mini-LED w/ QLED

Refresh rate

Up to 165Hz

Up to 144Hz

Up to 165Hz

165Hz

HDR support

Dolby Vision IQ//HDR10+ Adaptive/HLG

Dolby Vision IQ/HDR10+/HDR10/HLG

Dolby Vision IQ/HDR10+/HDR10/HLG

HDR10+/HDR10/HLG

Smart TV

Google TV

Google TV

Google TV

Tizen

HDMI ports

4 HDMI 2.1

4 (2x HDMI 2.1)

3x HDMI 2.1

4x HDMI 2.1

TCL QM7K
The TCL QM7K is another great mid-range mini-LED TV with an affordable price tag. It has a better design than the Hisense, but its picture isn't as powerfully bright and its gaming flexibility is limited by having only two HDMI 2.1 ports.

Read our full TCL QM7K review

Hisense U8QG
The Hisense U8QG has a similar feature set to the U75QG but a better overall design with a sturdy aluminum pedestal stand. Its picture brightness is about the same, although the U8QG's 4.1.2-channel speaker array provides more immersive sound. It's a bit more expensive than the U75QG but not by much.

Read our full Hisense U8QG review

Samsung QN90F
The Samsung QN90F is the best mini-LED TV on the market when you take into account picture quality, design, and gaming features and performance. It's notably more expensive than the Hisense U75QG but has much better off-axis picture uniformity and is also available in a wide range of sizes, including 43- and 98-inch models.

Read our full Samsung QN90F review

(Image credit: Future)How I tested the Hisense U75QG

• The U75QG was my main TV for a couple weeks
• Tested with Calman color calibration software
• Used a variety of test material from streaming and discs

I watched a wide range of content on the Hisense U75QG, including movies and TV shows streaming from the built-in Google TV OS on Disney+, HBO Max, and Hulu. I also used a Kaleidescape Strato V for high-quality movies, along with 4K UHD Blu-ray discs played on an Oppo UDP-203 disc player. Games were played on an Xbox Series X.

For grayscale and color accuracy testing, I used a Portrait Displays C6 HDR5000 colorimeter profiled to an X-rite i1 Pro 3 spectrophotometer, Murideo Seven-G 8K pattern generator, Konica Minolta LS-100 luminance meter, and Calman calibration software by Portrait Displays. I used a Leo Bodnar 4K lag tester to check input lag.

I’ve been testing TVs, monitors, and projectors for a few decades, and am an ISF Level III certified calibrator.

You can read an in-depth overview of how we test TVs at TechRadar at that link.

• First reviewed: November 2025
• Read TechRadar's reviews guarantee

Topping DX5 II: Two-minute review

The DX5 II is the product that Chinese specialist Topping hopes is going to force its name into the ‘affordable desktop audio’ conversation – and so it’s specified it accordingly and then priced it in the most aggressive manner imaginable.

A selection of digital inputs and a wider selection of balanced and unbalanced outputs mean the DX5 II can function as a DAC and headphone amp, like many of the best portable DACs we recommend can, but it can also become a preamp for use with a traditional stereo system or a pair of powered speakers – which your average portable DAC definitely can't do. So, this is new ground for many a headphone amp-owner.

ESS Sabre digital-to-analogue conversion with a native resolution of 32bit/768kHz and DSD512 means the DX5 II is as high-resolution a device as these things ever get. A variety of finishes, each one tidily realised and each one complementing an impeccable standard of build and finish, means the DX5 II won’t lower the visual tone of your system or your desktop. A selection of desktop Topping technologies designed to maximise sonic performance act as the cherry on top.

And no matter if you use it as a DAC, a preamp or a headphone amp, the DX5 II has an awful lot to recommend it where sound quality is concerned. It creates a big, open soundstage and organises it carefully. It’s detailed and dynamic in equal measure, and it controls low-frequency information to the point that rhythms are delivered with real positivity. It’s eloquent through the midrange, and its top-to-bottom frequency response is smooth too. In fact, there’s only a suggestion of overly bright treble response that represents a tiny fly in a great big vat of sonic ointment.

Topping DX5 II review: Price and release date

(Image credit: Future)

• Launched on June 10, 2025
• Priced $299 / £299 / AU$499

The Topping DX5 II is on sale now, and in the UK it goes for £299. Those numbers apply in the United States too, where it sells for $299 (subject to tariff fluctuations) while in Australia it will set you back AU$499.

A quick comparison then: it's a fair amount of product for the money. FiiO's pocketable BTR17 portable Bluetooth DAC/headphone amplifier sells for just a little less, at around $219 / £179 / AU$329 – but it's a portable little beast rather than a 'desktop' option.

The USB DAC iFi GO Bar Kensei is more, at $499 / £449 / AU$769, while the five-star iFi hip-dac 3 is less, at $199 / £199 / AU$349. All of which is a roundabout way of saying, there's certainly a market for the Topping DX5 II at this price, if it can take care of business.

(Image credit: Future)Topping DX5 II review: Features

• ESS Sabre 32bit/768kHz and DSD512 DACs
• Bluetooth 5.1 with aptX Adaptive and LDAC compatibility
• Balanced and unbalanced outputs

If Topping has attempted to build the DX5 II down to a price, it’s in no way obvious from the way the device is specified. There are similar products costing a fair bit more than Topping is asking that don’t tick as many spec boxes.

Consider the array of inputs and outputs, for instance. The DX5 II can accept digital audio information via coaxial or optical (which both top out at 24bit/192kHz), USB-B (a giddy 32bit/768kHz and DSD512), or Bluetooth 5.1 with SBC, AAC, several aptX standards (up to and including Adaptive) and LDAC. It’s worth mentioning that Windows PC users will need to install a driver to make use of that USB-B socket. Once the digital audio information been converted to the analog equivalent (which I’ll get to in a moment) it can come out again via single-ended stereo RCAs or balanced stereo XLRs (for connection to powered speakers or the amplifier of a traditional stereo system), or via a trio of headphone outputs – balanced XLR, balanced 4.4mm and single-ended 6.3mm.

Conversion to analog from digital is handled by a couple of ESS Sabre ES9038Q2M two-channel DAC chips – one attends to the left channel, the other to the right. They include ESS Sabre’s latest ‘Hyperstream IV’ architecture that’s intended to suppress noise and deliver optimal dynamic range – and their native 32bit/768kHz and DSD512 resolution is about as hi-res as hi-res ever gets out in the real world. To further suppress noise and distortion, Topping has developed a bespoke current-to-voltage conversion module that should also make the DX5 II compatible with a very wide selection of headphones and powered speakers.

And on top of this, Topping has included its own ‘X-Hybrid’ headphone amplification technology. It’s a fully balanced four-channel design with three stages (discrete input, op-amp -based gain stage, discrete output). This optimised circuit topology is designed to offer extended dynamic range, optimum efficiency and low distortion – and it should mean the DX5 II has no problem driving even the most uncooperative and power-hungry headphones.

Now, the free ‘Topping Tune’ software: it was only available for Windows PC at the time of testing, but it’s now also available for Mac OS users and provides access to Topping’s new ‘PEQ’ (parametric equaliser) algorithm that allows control of bandwidth, frequency and gain across ten definable bands. It means multiple audio profiles can be created, saved and uploaded to the DX5 II, target curves can be defined and imported – and different profiles can be applied to specific inputs, so the ultimate sound of headphones or speakers can be individually tuned by the Topping.

Features score: 5 / 5

(Image credit: Future)Topping DX5 II review: Sound quality

• Great sense of space and detail
• Dynamic and punchy when required
• A hint of top-end brightness

In virtually every respect, the Topping DX5 II does straightforwardly impressive work. So much so, in fact, that I might as well deal with the one aspect where it doesn’t outright excel – which should leave plenty of space for me to explain just what’s so likeable about it.

The top of the frequency range is just a little flimsy and bright when compared to everything else that’s going on underneath it. There’s an overly bright quality to the treble reproduction here, a sort of latent edginess that means the DX5 II is just slightly pickier about partnering equipment than it otherwise would be.

And with that out of the way, let’s get to all the good stuff.

The DX5 II is an open, detailed and considered listen, with the sort of soundstaging ability that makes even a complex recording like The Birth and Death of the Day by Explosions in the Sky easy to follow on a granular level. This recording also allows the DX5 II to demonstrate its considerable dynamic headroom – the distance between the moments of greatest intensity and attack, compared to the quietest and most contemplative moments, is significant.

The Topping is also alert to the dynamics of harmonic variation, too – and, in fact, shows a great facility for detail retrieval in every circumstance. It can identify, reveal and quite carefully contextualise even transient or minor details in a mix. And this goes a long way towards creating the sensation that you’re in full receipt of everything a recording has to offer.

The tonality of the low frequencies and the midrange is tidy and naturalistic, and the frequency response from the very bottom to the very top is smooth and even. Low frequencies are deep and textured, and carry a huge amount of information along with very pleasing tonal variation – and they’re controlled at the point of attack, too, so rhythmic expression is assured. The DX5 II punches into bass sounds, rather than slurring, and it observes the decay of those same sounds very carefully too.

The midrange is equally well-realised. The voice during a 24bit/96kHz FLAC file of Ghostpoet’s Off Peak Dreams is characterful and attitudinal, and there’s a tremendous amount of fine detail regarding technique and tone revealed at the same time as information about intention and emotion. The Topping communicates through the midrange in the most articulate manner, and as a result voices always sound direct and positive.

All of the above is true no matter what you’re asking the DX5 II to do. As long as you take a moment’s care with your choice of headphones, as long as the system you’re introducing it into doesn’t share the same latent treble tendencies, it’s a deft and remarkably accomplished performer.

Sound quality: 4.5 / 5

(Image credit: Future)Topping DX5 II review: Design

• 44 x 190 x 155mm (HxWxD)
• Black, silver or white finishes
• Properly built and finished

It’s become apparent lately that ‘desktop’ is a relative term – but Topping really means it when it describes the DX5 II as a desktop device. At a neat 44 x 190 x 155mm (HxWxD) it isn’t going to get in the way, even if your desktop is as untidy as mine.

The standard of build and finish is exemplary, and the DX5 II even feels good in a matte-finish, square-edged kind of way. The little indent around the rear of the fascia adds a tiny hint of visual interest, and the Topping looks very presentable in any of the black, silver or white finishes that are available.

Design score: 5 / 5

(Image credit: Future)Topping DX5 II review: Usability and setup

• 2-in full-colour display
• Remote control handset
• Legible and sensible on-screen menus

There are some physical controls on the fascia of the DX5 II – they’re grouped to the right of the crisp, full-colour screen that occupies the centre. Three rectangular buttons take care of input selection, accessing set-up menus, and cycling through the various display options for that screen, while a larger turn/press dial takes care of volume and menu navigation.

Options for the screen consist of a ‘spectrum analyser’ (which is sure to remind readers of a certain age of a graphic equaliser from back in the day), a readout of volume level, file format and file resolution, or a virtual VU meter (which is one for readers of an even more certain age). There’s a choice of colour and adjustable brightness, but in every circumstance the display is legible and crisply rendered, so navigating menus is always straightforward.

The Topping is also supplied with a little remote control handset that is, predictably, a lot less visually interesting and a lot less tactile than the control interface on the device itself. And unlike the DX5 II itself, there’s no choice of finish available – it comes in traditional black.

Usability and setup score: 4.5 / 5

Topping DX5 II review: Value

Judge it on the physical size of the product and the DX5 II can seem quite expensive. Consider it in terms of its specification and it suddenly seems much more realistically priced. And then think about its functionality, its flexibility and the highlights of its performance and the Topping starts to look like a bit of a bargain.

Value score: 4.5 / 5

Should I buy the Topping DX5 II?

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Features

Comprehensively specified – it'll even work as a preamp

5/5

Design

Small, svelte and useful enough to slip onto even the untidiest of desks

5/5

Sound quality

Dynamic, punchy and detailed, if just a tad bright on occasion

4.5/5

Value

It would be wrong to argue with the sound-per-pound value here

4.5/5

(Image credit: Future)Buy it if...

You want to up your desktop audio game
The difference the DX5 II can make to the sound of your laptop really needs to be heard

You have a traditional audio system that could do with some digital smarts
High-quality Bluetooth streaming can be yours, no matter how old-school your stereo system

You have some nice headphones that need the best bringing from them
The Topping is ready and able to drive the most demand and/or most high-achieving headphones around

Don't buy it if...

You have headphones that are lively at the top of the frequency range
The resulting sound could easily be interpreted as ‘too much of a good thing’

Topping DX5 II review: Also consider

It’s pretty plain that the iFi Zen DAC 3 is the product the DX5 II needs to topple – or, at the very least, compete hard with if it’s going to be a viable option.

The iFi is a nice-looking, properly built and handily specified device, and it’s capable of extremely clean, confident and full-bodied sound. Which, of course, are all things that equally apply to the Topping machine…

How I tested the Topping DX5 II

I tried a bit of everything, basically – I used the DX5 II on my desktop, connected it to my laptop via USB, and plugged in a pair of high-end IEMs via the balanced 4.4mm headphone output.

I connected it to my reference stereo system using its single-ended RCAs and its balanced XLR outputs – this way I was able to use it as a DAC for my CD player and, with it wirelessly connected to my smartphone, as a Bluetooth receiver. And I tried out these various roles and functions for a working week or more.

• First reviewed: November 2025
• Read TechRadar's reviews guarantee

DwarfLab Dwarf III: Two-minute review

The Dwarflabs Dwarf III smart telescope is a mini marvel. My first astrophotography set-up 10 years ago weighed more than 20kg / 44lbs – but this excellent little self-contained device comes in at a mere 1.3kg / 2.8lbs and is small enough to fit in airline carry-on luggage.

In fact, that's exactly what I did with it a few months ago, taking it with me on vacation to Greece. I've also used it extensively in my garden in the UK and compared it thoroughly to another smart telescope, the ZWO Seestar S50. And as you can see from my verdict and score above, I love it.

But I'm getting ahead of myself, so let's start with the basics.

The Dwarf III is one of the new breed of smart telescopes which simplify and automate the process of astrophotography to bring it to within easy reach of those without the time or money needed for a 'proper' set-up of mount, telescope and camera.

As with smart telescopes from rivals ZWO, Vaonis and Unistellar, the Dwarf III doesn't have an eyepiece you look through, and doesn't in any way resemble a classic telescope such as a reflector or refractor. Instead, it tracks objects in the night sky then takes photos of them and 'stacks' them.

This process increases the faint signal being captured in order to bring out details – because if you just looked at a single shot, you'd see very little beyond a few stars. The resulting image can be viewed in real-time as it develops on your phone's screen, which is essentially your eyepiece.

You can see it in action below, with the fuzzy object that's barely visible after five frames eventually becoming the recognizable Crescent Nebula after about 60 frames:

The Crescent nebula appearing in real time on my phone (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)

The Dwarf III has two lenses to capture its targets, one 35mm telephoto and one 3.4mm wide-angle – although the latter is mainly used for finding objects rather than shooting them.

The telephoto has a 2.9x1.7-degree field of view, which can fit the moon in it about six times and which has space for almost every galaxy and nebula you might want to capture. I go into this in more detail below, but this wide FOV is one of my favorite things about it.

Inside, there's a 4K IMX678 Starvis 2 sensor, which is on the budget end compared to that found within dedicated cooled astronomy cameras but which delivers excellent results, helped also by the fast f/4.3 f-ratio; this captures light more quickly than some rival smart scopes.

It's all controlled by the DwarfLab app, which gives you everything you need to take photos of the night skies without the need for you to do much more than choose your target and set it going. Even if you've never used a smart telescope – or any kind of telescope – before, you should be up and running within a few minutes.

In fact, roughly 20 minutes after taking it out of the box you could be viewing your first shot of wonderfully named objects such as the Elephant's Trunk nebula or Sombrero galaxy – the Dwarf III really is that easy to set up and use.

And when you do so, I'm pretty sure you'll be impressed, because the Dwarf III takes excellent photos given its small stature and low-ish price. It's truly one of the best ways into this fascinating hobby.

DwarfLab Dwarf III: price and availability

The Dwarf III is competitively priced for what it does – note you'll need to buy a tripod separately (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)

The DwarfLabs Dwarf III was released in May 2025 and is competitively priced, coming in at $549 / £459 / AU$849. Depending on where you are in the world, that's either slightly cheaper or the same price as one of its main rivals, the ZWO Seestar S50, which costs $549 / £539 / AU$949. Compared to the Seestar S30, which is a comparable size to the Dwarf III, it's more expensive though; that model comes in at $399 / £419 / AU$699.

It's also worth noting that unlike the two Seestar models, the Dwarf III doesn't come with a tripod. Many keen photographers and stargazers will already own one, but if not you can buy one with the telescope for an additional $89 / £73 / AU$149. Or, of course, you can add your own; we have plenty of good options in our list of the best travel tripods. Either way, that might bump up the price a little.

DwarfLab Dwarf III: Specs

Aperture (tele)

35mm

Focal length (tele)

150 mm (737mm equivalent)

Aperture (wide)

3.4mm

Focal length (wide)

6.7mm (45mm equivalent)

Sensor

Sony IMX678 STARVIS 2

Resolution (stills)

Telephoto: 3840x2160 (4K); wide-angle: 1920x1080 (FHD)

Resolution (video)

Telephoto: 4K @ 30fps; wide-angle: 1080p @ 30fps

Filters (built in)

VIS, Astro, Dual-band

Mount type

Alt-azimuth and EQ mode

Accessories

USB-C cable, carry case, solar filter

Battery life

10,000mAh / 4 hours

Charging

USB-C

Storage

128GB

Dimensions

222x142x65mm

Weight

1.3 kg / 2.87 lbs

DwarfLab Dwarf III: DesignImage 1 of 3

The included carrying case is a nice addition (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 2 of 3

Small but mighty (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 3 of 3

The Dwarf III weighs only 1.3kg (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)

Looks-wise, the Dwarf III is about as far from a traditional telescope as you could get. Powered off, it resembles a beefy external hard drive from about 2010, but turn it on to reveal the twin lenses and it's more like some kind of futuristic security-camera-robot hybrid.

It's actually pretty cute, with a certain Wall-E charm about it (or maybe that's just me). Either way, it's well built: solid, with a smooth plastic finish and an IP54 rating that keeps it safe from dust, moisture and dew.

It's also impressively small – like, how-did-they-fit-all-that-in-there small, a feeling that only grows after you see what it's capable of. It's relatively light, too, at 1.3kg / 2.87lbs; that's almost half the 2.5kg of the Seestar S50 and a little less than the S30.

There's not a lot to look at, externally. Beyond those two lenses and the DwarfLab logo, there's the main power button – a big circular affair that's very easy to find in the dark and which has a glowing green ring around it – plus a battery status indicator of four green dots, and a single USB-C charging port. On the bottom, meanwhile, there's a 1/4-inch tripod thread.

Image 1 of 4

The Dwarf III's twin lenses (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 2 of 4

The power button is easy to find at night (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 3 of 4

Battery life is not the best (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 4 of 4

Charging is via USB-C (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)

It comes with an excellent carrying case, plus a couple of accessories: a USB-C charging cable, lens wipe cloth, plus a solar filter. The latter snaps on magnetically in a pleasing fashion, and comes with a pouch to keep it safe.

Design is all very well thought out and though it's a shame it doesn't come with a tripod, that's the only minus point in this regard. It's not a massive problem, either, because many of the telescope's intended customers will already have one, and it helps keep the price low.

I've been using either the Seestar S50's tripod or a K&F Concept 64in/163cm model which costs $49 in the US, £45 in the UK and AU$150 in Australia. This is light, sturdy and has a 360-degree ballhead which makes it very easy to angle the Dwarf III for EQ mode (of which more later).

DwarfLab Dwarf III: Features and performance

The included solar filter snaps on magnetically (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)

The Dwarf III is a feature-rich device, with a multitude of abilities and use cases.

Obviously the first of those is to take photos of the night skies, and it does that very well thanks to its 4K Sony IMX678 Starvis 2 sensor – the same type as used in some of the best dash cams, including the Thinkware U3000 Pro. Starvis 2 is particularly strong in low light, while the IMX678's 4K resolution gives you more pixels to work with when cropping in on small and distant objects.

The twin lenses are very helpful. The telephoto is what you'll take most of your images with, while the wide-angle one is mainly for locating objects in the first place; you can take photos with it too, but it has a much lower resolution.

I've got a full gallery of astro images taken with the telescope below, but for now here's just one, my favorite that I've shot with the device. It shows the Eagle Nebula, Messier 16, and if you zoom in on the middle you'll see the famous 'Pillars of Creation', the swirling clouds of dust and gas that wowed the world when the Hubble telescope shot them two decades ago.

The Eagle Nebula, processed in Pixinsight, and showing the Eagles of Creation in the center (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)

The Dwarf III has three internal filters. The most important is the dual-band filter, which targets the OIII (sulphur) and H⍺ (hydrogen) wavelengths – in layman's terms, this means it can capture more of the faint details in nebulae and reduce the impact of light pollution. There's also an astro filter, which extends into the infra-red range and which works best on galaxies and star clusters, and a 'VIS' filter which is used for daytime photography. All are easily selected within the Dwarf III's app; you don't need to physically attach anything.

Speaking of daytime photography, DwarfLabs make a big pitch around the telescope's usefulness around bird watching, and theoretically you could use it instead of a mirrorless camera and telephoto lens for any subject – just don't expect it to rival an expensive chunk of glass from Canon, Nikon or Sony.

The daytime photography ('General') mode includes burst and timelapse options, plus object tracking which I found to be a little hit and miss. 4K video can be recorded at up to 30fps, or 60fps if you switch to 1080p.

There's also a solar system mode for snapping the sun, moon and (theoretically) planets, plus a panorama mode. In Astro mode, meanwhile, you can shoot in either alt-azimuth or equatorial mode.

Performance-wise, the Dwarf III is pretty snappy to turn on and off, and slews to targets quickly and reasonably quietly; it makes less noise than the Seestar S50, for instance, although neither would be likely to wake even the lightest of sleepers next door.

In use, it's unerringly accurate in finding targets, zipping about the sky when you tell it where to go via the built-in star atlas.

It's also incredibly reliable when shooting. If the tracking on a motorized telescope is even a tiny bit off, you'll get star trails and the individual frame will be rejected and not included in the 'stack', potentially reducing detail in the final stacked image. With the Dwarf III, this almost never happened – I generally got around an 80-90% success rate, so if I shot a target for an hour, I'd get around 50 minutes' worth of photos. This is way better than my experience than shooting with the Seestar S50, where it can be more like 50% at times.

Plus, that's when shooting with 15-second exposures in alt-az mode; put it in EQ mode and you can get 30s shots with a similar success rate. This all makes it very easy to capture a lot of data on a target in a short time.

One of the few downsides is that the battery is not the biggest – only 10,000mAh, which is good for about 5 hours in astro mode when tracking and shooting a target, according to DwarfLab, and which was about right in my experience. You almost certainly won't get through a full night's shooting with it.

That said, I didn't put it to the test often, preferring instead to leave a much bigger power bank connected to it to ensure I got a full night's shooting. I tend to use Iniu power banks, which I've found to be very reliable and extremely well priced; the model below is well worth checking out and will triple the Dwarf III's capacity.

DwarfLab Dwarf III: Software

Scheduling on the Dwarf III is very simple (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)

The nature of a smart telescope means that all of your interactions with it will be via an app – it's not like you can look through as you can with an old-school reflector or refractor.

That puts a lot of pressure on the device's software to be slick and simple to use, and fortunately the Dwarf III's is just that – with a few caveats.

I began using the Dwarf III several months ago, and on my first few nights shooting with it found the interface to be a little confusing. It wasn't a horror show by any means, but it wasn't as intuitive as ZWO's Seestar app. For instance, I'd click on the big 'Photo' button front and center to start shooting a galaxy or nebula, then would realize that I'd have to go back in and select the 'Atlas' option to actually choose my target.

Settings for options such as exposure time, meanwhile, were hidden within a menu called 'Function' – which really didn't (to me) suggest 'Settings'. I got used to it all after a few nights, but it was a little more confusing than it could have been.

The good news is that DwarfLabs is continually updating the platform, and a recent update has massively improved the experience. Those settings are now within a menu named 'Parameter, which is far more sensible, and the Atlas is available from within the shooting screen. There's a simple toggle between the wide and telephoto cameras, whereas before you tapped the small one to change between them, but again without labelling. It's all much more slick and easy to use.

(Note that most of my images in this review are using the old version of the software, because there's not been a clear night in the UK for me to take further screenshots for what feels like about 15 years now. I'll update them soon.)

There's a scheduling feature within the app, which works as you'd want it to and which is better than the one in ZWO's app. This is a vital inclusion, because most people won't want to stay up all night – they'll want to set the Dwarf III running with a list of targets, then wake refreshed in the morning to a lovely collection of images.

It's very easy to get polar alignment in EQ mode via the Dwarf III app (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)

Switching to EQ mode is also pretty trouble-free. For the uninitiated, this lets the Dwarf III rotate fully in sync with the skies, meaning you can take longer exposures than in standard alt-az mode. Anything longer than 30 seconds will need to be in EQ mode (the maximum exposure is two minutes) and in my experience it's best for 30 seconds too; alt-az mode is fine for 15s exposures.

The Dwarf III app guides you through the process of setting the telescope into EQ mode, telling you exactly which direction and what amount to adjust the tripod head by, and the whole thing only takes about five minutes, less if you haven't moved the tripod since the previous session.

The Stellar Studio processing suite can get great results with very little effort (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)

The included Stellar Studio software is also great. This lets you carry out basic processing actions on photos via the cloud, rather than needing to download them to your computer.

It's not exactly stacked with options, but does a really good job of reducing noise, sharpening stars and bringing out details. You can also remove stars entirely if you want that lovely clean view of a galaxy or nebula.

The Dwarf III's wide-angle and telephoto cameras work well in General/Daytime mode (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)

Finally, in 'General' mode the app works pretty well to let you zoom in on a target. You can use the wide-angle view to get an overall view of your surroundings, then click on the screen to adjust where the telephoto lens is pointing. Another click switches to the telephoto view and you can start snapping away.

DwarfLab Dwarf III: Image qualityImage 1 of 38

The Eagle nebula, unprocessed (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 2 of 38

The Eagle nebula, processed in Pixinsight (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 3 of 38

The East Veil nebula, unprocessed (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 4 of 38

The East Veil nebula, processed in Pixinsight (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 5 of 38

The Bubble nebula, unprocessed (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 6 of 38

The Bubble nebula, processed in Pixinsight (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 7 of 38

The West Veil nebula, unprocessed (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 8 of 38

The West Veil nebula, processed in Pixinsight (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 9 of 38

The Andromeda Galaxy, M33, unprocessed (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 10 of 38

The Andromeda Galaxy, M33, processed in Pixinsight (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 11 of 38

The Heart nebula, unprocessed (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 12 of 38

The Heart nebula, processed in Pixinsight (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 13 of 38

The Soul nebula, unprocessed (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 14 of 38

The Soul nebula, processed in Pixinsight (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 15 of 38

The M33 galaxy in Triangulum, unprocessed (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 16 of 38

The M33 galaxy in Triangulum, processed in Pixinsight (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 17 of 38

The Omega nebula, unprocessed (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 18 of 38

The Omega nebula, processed in Pixinsight (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 19 of 38

The Pacman nebula, unprocessed (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 20 of 38

The Pacman nebula, processed in Pixinsight (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 21 of 38

M24, the small Sagittarius star cloud, unprocessed (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 22 of 38

M24, the small Sagittarius star cloud, processed in Pixinsight (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 23 of 38

The Iris nebula, unprocessed (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 24 of 38

The Iris nebula, processed in Pixinsight (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 25 of 38

The Elephant's Trunk nebula, unprocessed (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 26 of 38

The Elephant's Trunk nebula, processed in Pixinsight (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 27 of 38

The Crescent nebula, unprocessed (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 28 of 38

The Crescent nebula, processed in Pixinsight (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 29 of 38

The Pelican nebula, unprocessed (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 30 of 38

The Pelican nebula, processed in Pixinsight (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 31 of 38

The Double Cluster, unprocessed (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 32 of 38

The Double Cluster, processed in Pixinsight (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 33 of 38

The Wizard nebula, unprocessed (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 34 of 38

The Wizard nebula, processed in Pixinsight (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 35 of 38

The Dumbbell nebula, unprocessed (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 36 of 38

The Dumbbell nebula, processed in Pixinsight (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 37 of 38

The M39 cluster, unprocessed (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 38 of 38

The M39 cluster, processed in Pixinsight (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)

There's one very important thing that anyone using a smart telescope for the first time needs to understand: you won't be getting Hubble-challenging images straight out of the camera. Well, obviously, you won't be getting Hubble-challenging images at all; this is a $500 smart telescope, not a rig that costs 10 times that.

But even with that in mind, there's a big difference between the photos that the Dwarf III creates for you, and the results that you can achieve with some proper processing.

The easiest way to demonstrate that is with some before and after photos – so check out the gallery above. In every case, you'll see the unprocessed image produced by the Dwarf III first, followed by the version I processed in Pixinsight, the specialist astrophotography software I use.

Image 1 of 3

The unprocessed image of the East Veil nebula (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 2 of 3

The East Veil nebula processed in DwarfLab's Stellar Studio (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 3 of 3

And my version processed in Pixinsight (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)

Now, let's get one thing straight: I'm not an expert when it comes to astro image processing. It's an incredibly complex hobby, with sometimes arcane software to master and a surprisingly large amount of technical knowledge needed to really get the best results. In fact, I think I prefer some of the Dwarf III's images, at least when it comes to color – which is one of the toughest things to get right.

Regardless of what you think of my images (I won't be offended, promise), you can see that processing reduces noise and brings out more detail and color. To really get the best from the Dwarf III, you will still want to do some processing.

Fortunately, as mentioned above, it's pretty easy to considerably improve things within the Dwarf III's Stellar Studio on your phone, with no need to shell out for or learn anything more complicated.

For instance, try the above image of the glorious East Veil nebula – the original, unprocessed image is pretty good, but Stellar Studio turns it into something epic, and my Pixinsight version is only a slight improvement (if anything).

The Dwarf III's wide field of view really shines with this shot of the awesome Bubble Nebula (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)

One of the things I really love about the Dwarf III is its wide 2.9x1.7-degree field of view, even when using the telephoto camera. The Seestar S50 has a much narrower 0.7x1.2-degree FOV, while the S30 is close to the Dwarf at 1.22x2.13-degree.

The net effect of this is that you get a real sense of drama with the Dwarf III. I love the Seestar S50, but with many targets you end up with a close-up of the object. You can get around this by using mosaic mode (the Dwarf also has one of these), but in my experience mosaics take longer to shoot and are harder to process.

The Dwarf, meanwhile, almost always captures the object and its surroundings. Its field of view is wide enough to cover the whole of Andromeda, for instance, whereas the S50 gets only the central section.

Of course you may prefer a closer view of targets, but the Dwarf's 4K resolution means you can crop in anyway and still have a decent-sized image. It's possible that the Seestar S30 will give me the FOV I love from the Dwarf with some of ZWO's advantages too, but I've not used that device yet, so that comparison will have to wait.

Image 1 of 3

The Dwarf III takes decent nature photos, but they're not what you'd buy it for (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 2 of 3

The ability to easily find and then zoom in on targets is one of the Dwarf III's strengths (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)Image 3 of 3

Solar photography on the Dwarf III is easy and produces good results (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)

In general mode, image quality is fine. That's a pretty nice shot of a pigeon on my lawn above, but view the full-size image and you'll see the feathers lack definition. My Fujifilm X-T5 mirrorless camera would do a better job with a good zoom lens.

Solar photography, meanwhile, is easy to do – you simply snap on the filter then move to the target. Admittedly, for some reason the Dwarf finds it much harder to locate the sun than it does a tiny object many millions of light years away, but the Seestar S50 is no different in this regard.

I've only taken a few solar shots with the Dwarf III and was relatively impressed by them, but it's not an area of photography I'm particularly interested in.

Should I buy the DwarfLabs Dwarf III?Buy it if…

You're a beginner
The Dwarf III is one of the easiest, most hassle-free ways to give astrophotography a whirl. Beginners will be taking photos of galaxies in no time.View Deal

You don't have much time
You can pick up the Dwarf III and have it shooting within minutes – which is great if you either have a busy life or are afflicted by cloudy skies. View Deal

You want to travel light
The Dwarf III is small enough to chuck in a bag and take away for a trip – and light enough that it won't break your back.View Deal

Don't buy it if…

You're an upgrader
The Dwarf III is unashamedly a beginner scope. Sure, it can take amazing photos, but after a year or two you may find yourself wanting to upgrade – and as this is an all-in-one device, that means buying a new model. View Deal

You want a tighter field of view
The Dwarf III's wide view is great for big targets, but you'll get a closer vision of small objects such as planetary nebulae with the Seestar S50.View Deal

You want to take photos of planets
As above, the Dwarf III's field of view makes it entirely unsuited to imaging Mars, Jupiter and the rest of the gang. You might see a small Saturn-shaped dot, but not much more. View Deal

Also consider

ZWO Seestar S50

The S50 has a longer focal length and bigger aperture than the Dwarf III, meaning you get a much closer view and a bit more detail. I own the S50 and have taken some wonderful photos with it – choosing between them is tough. Really it depends on which field of view you prefer. View Deal

ZWO Seestar S30

The S30 has the same focal length and a similar field of view to the Dwarf, but a smaller aperture. I've not used it, but I expect it to deliver similar – but probably slightly inferior – results to the Dwarf.View Deal

Unistellar Odyssey Pro

The Unistellar Odyssey Pro is in a different class of smart telescope entirely, with a price tag of $4,500 / £3,500 and far better specs in almost every regard. At this price you could get an impressive mount+telescope+camera set-up, though – so it's probably best suited to those who have more money than time.View Deal

How I tested the DwarfLabs Dwarf III

The Dwarf III smart telescope on a roof terrace in Crete (Image credit: Future/TechRadar)

I took the Dwarf III with me on vacation to Crete, Greece, where I was lucky enough to be staying in an apartment with a roof terrace – and in a country with clear skies every night. I used the smart telescope extensively over the next week or so, taking photos of multiple targets including the Eagle nebula, Omega nebula and Andromeda galaxy.

When I returned to the UK, I used it whenever I could, which unfortunately was not that often due to the clouds which blanket the nation for about three-quarters of every month. Here, I set it up alongside my ZWO Seestar S50, taking photos of the same subjects for the same amount of time so I could directly compare results.

I also tried it in EQ mode, in Solar mode, in General mode for a bit of nature photography and spent many hours processing the photos it produced in all modes.

Shark Freestyle Max: two-minute reviewProduct info

This model has slightly different names and product codes in different territories:

US: Freestyle Max SV2002
UK: Freestyle Pro / Freestyle Max SV2000UK
AU: Freestyle Max SV2000NV

For this review, I tested the US version. The UK version has also been tested by the TechRadar homes team. The only notable discrepancy between the different versions is that the US version has headlamps, and the UK and AU versions do not.

The Shark Freestyle Max is not your average upright vacuum. It's far lighter and more streamlined, and it's cordless too. After its launch in October 2025, I tested it out to see how it compares to both the best upright vacuums on the market and the best cordless vacuums.

In terms of suction power, I was very impressed. I used this vacuum in my 1600-square-foot home and it did a great job at cleaning fine materials and large debris from both hard floors and carpet-like rugs. It picked up everything in a single pass and got right up close to the edges of rooms, too.

The design is very basic but effective – you use your foot to press down on a big button on the floorhead to turn the machine on and off and switch modes. Charging happens via a dock, but this is about as compact as you can imagine – smaller than even the footprint of the vacuum itself. It's also incredibly affordable – pricing is lower than some of the best cheap vacuums on the market, but the suction power is up there with far pricier stick vacuums.

There are a couple of significant potential drawbacks. Firstly: battery life. The battery doesn't last longer than 20 minutes in hard floor mode and less than 12 minutes in carpet mode. That wasn't enough for me to clean my house in a single go without stopping to recharge (at least recharge is relatively quick at three hours). Secondly: the Freestyle Max is for use on floors only. There are no detail tools, and nor is there a flexible hose that enables you to use the vacuum to clean furniture, stairs, or up high.

If you can handle those drawbacks and are looking for a simple vacuum that packs the power of an upright but without the weight and bulk, the Freestyle Max is a great choice. Keep reading to get deeper insight into its pros and cons.

(Image credit: Future)Shark Freestyle Max review: price & availability

• List price: $199.99 / £149 / AU$249.99
• Launched: October 2025
• Available: US, UK, AU

The Shark Freestyle Max launched in October 2025, and at list price in the US it costs $199.99, though it's often on sale – at time of writing, it was down to $149.99.

There's an almost-identical model in the UK, minus the headlamps, which costs £149.99 but was discounted to £99 at time of writing. Shark doesn't seem to have decided whether to call it the Freestyle Pro or Freestyle Max, so look at the product code (SV2000UK) to make sure you're getting the right one. The AU model doesn't have headlamps either, and costs AU$249.99 at list price.

It's a budget buy on the wider market, and with the typical discount, it's well priced, considering the strong suction power and the shorter battery life.

Value for money score: 4.5 out of 5

• Value for money score: 4.5 out of 5

Shark Freestyle Max specs

Product code:

SV2002 (US) / SV2000UK (UK) / SV2000NV (AU)

Weight:

6.6 lbs / 3 kg

Bin size:

0.7qt / 0.7L

Max runtime:

21 mins

Charge time:

3 hrs 20

Size (H x W x L):

44.9 x 10.2 x 9.8in / 114 x 26 x 25cm

Modes:

Hard floor mode, Carpet mode

Cleaning path:

10.3in / 26.2cm

Headlamps:

Yes (US) / No (UK and AU)

Shark Freestyle Max review: design

• Extremely lightweight for an upright, and cordless
• Generous dust cup, foot-press button operation, and two suction modes
• Basic but effective in design

Shark set out with the intent to create a more compact and lightweight upright vacuum, and it did just that with the Shark Freestyle Max. Aesthetics wise, the vacuum is white and gray with a modern sleek design.

The vacuum is very lightweight, clocking in 6.6 lbs / 3kg, which would be fairly light for a stick vacuum, let alone an upright. Unlike other vacuums, the button to change between the two suction modes is found on top of the vacuum head.

(Image credit: Future)

To shift between the two modes, you press the button with your foot, and a blue or green light indicates which mode you're in. Look extremely closely and you'll see an icon to indicate that the more powerful 'green' should be used on carpet, whereas the lower-powered 'blue' is for hard flooring.

(Image credit: Future)

The vacuum locks in place so it can stand up on its own. Although the vacuum can't lean back 180 degrees, it comes very close. If I had to guess, I'd say the vacuum leans to about 160 degrees, which is not quite as nimble as a stick vacuum, but still very decent. The US version also has a headlight on the front of the vacuum head to help users see in dim spaces. This isn't included on the UK or Australian versions.

The 0.7-quart / 0.7L dust cup can be removed from the vacuum pod and emptied with a lid release button. A debris screen and filter are located inside the dustbin. There are no additional accessories, nor a flexible tube that would allow you to break down the vacuum and use it to clean windowsills or in the corners of ceilings, à la something like the Shark Stratos Upright.

(Image credit: Future)

Rather unusually, there's a dock for charging. This is smaller than even the footprint of the vacuum, but a simple plug-in setup would probably be more convenient.

Setup took only a few minutes. I just had to click the wand into the vacuum pod, and the vacuum pod onto the floor nozzle. From there, I charged the vacuum, and it was ready to go.

• Design score: 3.5 out of 5

Shark Freestyle Max review: performance

• Very powerful hard floor and carpet suction, with excellent edge cleaning
• Picks up fine materials in a single pass
• Maneuverable for an upright but not as nimble as a stick vacuum

From the get-go, I was impressed with the Shark Freestyle Max Cordless Upright Vacuum, especially in terms of suction power. It may be a simple vacuum without smart features or app integration, but it did a great job cleaning fine material – like flour – and larger items – like crumbs and leaves. In fact, no matter if I used the bare floor or the carpet mode, it only took a single pass on rugs and hard floors for the vacuum to pick up all material, be it dirt or hair.

I tested both the front edge and edge cleaning of the vacuum and was very happy with the results. It cleans right to the edge. Unfortunately, if I tried to vacuum in reverse, larger debris like coffee grinds got stuck behind the wheels. It was better to do a forward pass over a mess for quick and efficient cleaning.

I've tested many vacuums over the years, and the Shark Freestyle Max Cordless Upright Vacuum feels a lot more powerful than others. With some vacuums, I need to use a Max or a Turbo mode to pick up large debris. The Freestyle Max isn't outfitted with those types of modes, but thankfully, you don't need them. The suction power of this vacuum outshone many cordless stick vacuums that I've tested in the past.

While not as powerful as bulkier, corded uprights, it's right up there with the priciest cordless stick vacuums when it comes to power. TechRadar's Home Editor Ruth tested the UK version side-by-side with the Dyson Gen5detect and found the cleaning power comparable with that model – all the more impressive considering that vacuum costs five times the price.

(Image credit: Future)

The compromise here is that because of the higher suction power, the battery on this vacuum doesn't last very long. I discuss more about the battery in the battery section, but for reference, I wasn't able to clean my entire house switching between bare floor and carpet modes.

I love that the Shark Freestyle Max Cordless Upright Vacuum is outfitted with a headlight, as it made it easier to see dust and dirt in low lit areas. If only the vacuum paused when locked upright. In terms of sound, the hard floor mode has a dB rating of 79. I measured an 83 dB rating during carpet mode. In my opinion, the vacuum isn't any louder than most.

Image 1 of 3

(Image credit: Future)Image 2 of 3

(Image credit: Future)Image 3 of 3

(Image credit: Future)

The only other thing I should note is that the vacuum felt a little stiff in terms of maneuverability. Turning the vacuum left or right was not as smooth as I would have liked. While it's nimbler than your average upright vacuum, it's not as maneuverable as most stick vacuums I've used. At least it's lightweight, the vacuum head fits in relatively tight spaces, and it can lean back to about 160 degrees, making it easy to reach under my bed and low furniture.

(Image credit: Future)

Maintenance doesn't take long to complete. When the dust cup was full, I removed it from the vacuum pod and placed it over a trash can. Then I pressed the 'lid release' catch and the dust and dirt emptied. I was able to keep my hands clean. The debris screen and the filter – both located in the dust cup – need to be occasionally removed and washed with water, before air drying for 24 hours.

• Performance score: 4 out of 5

Shark Freestyle Max review: battery life

• 11 mins in Carpet mode; 21 mins in Hard floor mode
• Takes about 3 hours and 20 mins for the battery to fully recharge
• Battery not removable or replaceable

The battery life of the Shark Freestyle Max Cordless Upright Vacuum depends on which mode is being used. In higher-powered carpet mode, the battery lasted almost 11 and a half minutes, and in hard floor mode, 21 minutes.

Since I have both hard floors and rugs in my 1,600-square-foot house, I tested how long the battery lasted when switching between modes. I was able to clean my bare floors in 15 minutes. Then I switched to carpet mode to vacuum my rugs. The battery lasted only three more minutes, which was not enough time to fully vacuum one of my large rugs. The battery took about three hours and 20 minutes to fully charge. I let it charge for an hour, which gave it enough juice to finish vacuuming my rugs.

The Shark Freestyle Max Cordless Upright Vacuum's battery life is far shorter than most cordless stick vacuums – many models can last up to a full hour in their lowest-powered mode these days, and it's rare to see a maximum runtime shorter than 40 minutes. This model won't fit the bill for those with bigger homes or lots of carpet. However, I see it as a strong choice for apartments, small homes, or anyone who just like having a vacuum to do short bursts of cleaning.

One final black mark against Shark here is that the battery isn't removable or swappable, as is the case with most good modern cordless vacuums. That means once the batteries wears out, you'll have to throw the whole machine away.

• Battery life score: 2 out of 5

Should you buy the Shark Freestyle Max?

Attribute

Notes

Rating

Value

Very affordably priced, with performance up there with far more expensive cordless models. The compromise is short battery.

4.5 / 5

Design

Very basic in terms of features, but perfectly functional and well-built. Cordless uprights are very rare, so it fills that niche.

3.5 / 5

Performance

Very lightweight and maneuverable for an upright. Picks up fine and large materials in a single pass and offers impeccable edge cleaning.

4 / 5

Battery life

The battery doesn't last longer than 20 minutes, which is very short.

2 / 5

Buy it if...

You want a powerful vacuum for quick cleanups

The suction power of this vacuum is powerful, so much so that you can pick up small and large debris in one forward pass. It's not as sucky as the bulkiest corded uprights, but packs a real punch for a cordless.

You're on a budget

This vacuum has an extremely wallet-friendly price tag, and it's often discounted further. For the cleaning power on offer, it's a steal.

You have more limited mobility

Upright vacuums are typically heavy and bulky, but the Shark Freestyle Max Cordless Upright Vacuum is far more compact, lighter and easier to maneuver, but it still stands up on its own, making it a strong choice for those with limited mobility.

Don't buy it if...

You have a medium / large house or lots of carpet

The limited battery life – which is even shorter in the higher-powered mode – makes this vacuum a poor choice for larger homes or those with lots of carpet, unless you're only planning to use it for a room or two at a time.

You want to clean stairs or furniture

There's no configuration that lets you clean anything that's not flat floor. Most uprights have a flexible hose and detail tools for cleaning above the ground, but that's not included here.

You can handle a cord or a heavier upright

If you can deal with the extra weight and the inconvenience of a cord, there are uprights that deliver even more oomph, can be used for detail cleaning, and won't run out of juice mid-clean.

How I tested the Shark Freestyle Max

I tested the Shark Freestyle Max Cordless Upright Vacuum for a week in my 1,600-square-foot home, using it to vacuum my hardwood and laminate floors and two large rugs. Everything from how well it suctioned debris to the length of battery life and ease of movement was tested and considered when writing this review.

The UK version was also tested on-team in the TechRadar offices, where it was used on hard floor, mid-pile carpet and deep-pile carpet, and the suction power was compared to that of a premium Dyson stick vacuum.

Read more about how we test vacuum cleaners

• First reviewed November 2025

The Tales series has been going strong for almost 30 years. From the humble Tales of Phantasia to the recent Tales of Arise, the Japanese role-playing game franchise has shown no signs of slowing down.

Review info

Platform reviewed: PS5
Available on: PS5, Xbox Series X and Series S, PC, Nintendo Switch 2
Release date: October 31, 2025

In celebration of the anniversary, Bandai Namco has released a few remasters, one of which is Tales of Xillia Remastered. The 2013 original has now been reborn for the next generation of consoles and gamers, and I can safely say it’s well-deserved of it and more.

On the road (Again)

The story of Tales of Xillia follows a group of ragtag heroes on the lam after discovering a secret government weapon.

There’s a lot of depth and nuance laced in the narrative, as simple as it may seem at times. Its tackling of themes like life, neglect, and family rings true throughout. It's not too in your face either, weaving it all in like a fine tapestry for you to unravel as the story progresses. Plus, the action and drama are done quite well, delivering some great scenes and thoughtful moments.

If this is your first time with Xillia, there’s much to enjoy in it. For starters, the cast of colorful characters is among the series’ best. Each is highly memorable and lays the groundwork for future titles. From the shifty Alvin to the budding Leia, you instantly grow attached to them and by the game’s end, don’t want to leave them behind. Also, more games should have cool elders like Rowen. It shouldn't always just be teens hogging the spotlight!

Tales of Xillia Remastered can be played from two perspectives: the kind doctor Jude Mathis or the god-like deity Milla Maxwell. It’s the same story in each one, just told from a different viewpoint. Some plot points are learned earlier in one and later in another, and even holes in one story are filled in the next. Even if most of the gameplay is the same in each, it does boost the replayability a lot.

(Image credit: Bandai Namco)An old dog has learned some new tricks

In terms of updates, there’s a lot of work being done for the remaster. For one thing, it feels extremely approachable compared to other entries.

For example, guide markers for maps help steer players in the right direction, which is extremely helpful for certain maps. An autosave feature has also been added, which helps whenever you are unable to get to a save point or quicksave. All the additions are convenient and helpful, making Remastered the best version to play of Tales of Xillia.

Perhaps the biggest upgrade is the graphics. Seeing as Tales of Xillia is from 2013, it got a noticeable facelift in the remaster. Characters and settings look a lot nicer, and the improved framerate lends way to smoother gameplay. At times, however, the visuals can feel a bit lackluster, with some of the animations being a touch stiff.

Still, for a remaster, it does translate quite well and plays great on the PlayStation 5. Though some of the audio is a bit glitchy, with character's voices drowned out by mixing issues.

Best Bit

(Image credit: Bandai Namco)

The colorful cast of characters and abundant customization radiate throughout Tales of Xillia Remastered. Plus, with improved graphics and great accessibility, it makes for the most approachable Tales game yet.

If you played Tales of Arise, you may notice the battle system is quite different, but it’s one worth staying with. While the LMBS system does take some getting used to, it feels fluid and fun.

I was a bit intimidated, given I’m used to Arise’s open-air combat, but it does grow on you quickly. Despite an option to walk around freely, I barely used it, as I started to find the groove of the system.

Furthermore, the link system, which connects you with another member on the battlefield, is a lot of fun to use. Crafting combos on the fly and hitting a satisfying move on an enemy never got old.

(Image credit: Bandai Namco)Nostalgic yet new

One of the best parts of Tales of Xillia Remastered, for me at least, is the vast amount of customization at your disposal. While it is in the original, the Lillium Orb is a fantastic system for players to use. It lets you personalize your moves, stats, and skills to your desire. The same goes for your teammates, as you can outfit them however you like. Want your Milla to be magic-focused with Alvin dealing critical? It’s all there and something I hope future Tales titles return to.

For many, this is likely the first time they will play Tales of Xillia, and for others, it’s a return trip. The ones who will benefit the most from the remaster are newcomers, as it gives them a whole new playground to explore. Older fans will get to see the world they know brought back to life for new consoles. Luckily, there’s a lot to love from both perspectives, whether it’s the intuitive new features or the upgraded graphics.

Overall, Tales of Xillia Remastered set out to do one thing and did it right. A classic has been reborn for a new era, and even more fans get to meet Jude, Milla, and the gang and go on the run with them. The improved graphics, while a touch shoddy at times, bring life back to the world and give way to the best version of the title on the market. With tons of replayability, customization, and charm, you can’t go wrong with it.

(Image credit: Bandai Namco)Should you play Tales of Xillia Remastered?Play it if...

You love RPGS with a lovable cast of characters to spend time with
In an RPG the game is as good as the companions you spend it with. Luckily, Tales of Xillia has a great group to follow. Each new member adds a key element in battle and nobody feels out of place.

You enjoy intricate battle systems that allow for customizable builds
The Lillium Orb is a fantastic way to customize and personalize your playstyle. You can make any of your party the way you’d like them to be, like a unstoppable tank or a magic powerhouse. It’s an element that I hope makes a return in future titles, even if Arise moved away from it.

You liked any of the other Tales of games and want a new experience
For those who played Arise and Berseria, this is worth getting into. It’s not as long as those titles, but you’ll find it does all things a Tales game should: great gameplay, fun characters, and a gripping story.

Don't play it if...

You are looking for proper current-gen RPG experience
Unfortunately, while it does look better than the original, Tales of Xillia Remastered is still a bit rough around the edges due to its age. Compared to other remasters it doesn’t have too many updated textures. However, it does feel noticeably smoother thanks to the improved framerate.

Accessibility features

In terms of accessibility, there are a few different options to adjust. The biggest is difficulty, it ranges from easy to unknown, the hardest one. Map adjustments, like the newly added markers, are available, as is turning on/off encounters in the open world. You can also change between English and Japanese audio at any time. Button mapping is also customizable and easy to use.

There isn’t too much on display, though, and it may have benefited from adding colorblind modes. Still, what’s been added definitely helps make Tales of Xillia Remastered a more approachable title for newcomers and fans alike.

(Image credit: Bandai Namco)How I reviewed Tales of Xillia Remastered

I played Tales of Xillia Remastered for around 30 hours, finishing the main story with some side content. My first playthrough was Jude with some time in New Game+ as Milla Maxwell.

There is multiplayer available, but I did not try it for the review. I played the game on a base PS5 with the DualSense wireless controller and Razer BlackShark V2 wired gaming headset, all on a Roku 4K TV. If you played other Tales titles like Symphonia and Vesperia, you’ll find a lot of similarities here.

First reviewed November 2025

Govee Uplighter Floor Lamp review

The Govee Uplighter Floor Lamp is a feature-packed smart light that combines practical lighting with vivid and eye-catching visual effects through preset scenes and custom settings.

Since its launch in June 2025, the Govee Uplighter Floor Lamp has been available to buy direct from Govee, as well as Amazon and other retailers. It has a list price of $179.99 / £179.99, which is great value for money considering how convenient and versatile it is.

Better still, at the time of writing, Govee is offering a discount of $30 / £30, taking the cost down to just $149.99 / £149.99, which is a fantastic price considering this is one of the best smart lights I’ve tested. There’s a similar deal at Amazon, lowering the cost to £149.99 in the UK, but it's just $20 off in the US, so it’s worth purchasing from Govee if you’re buying from across the pond.

The process of assembling the Uplighter was straightforward, although I suggest having someone assist with attaching the lamp section to the pole if you have limited shoulder mobility. Alternatively, if you have the floorspace, you can do what I did and prop up the pole with boxes so you can build the lamp on its side, but it’s much more of a faff than assembling it standing up.

While the Uplighter is pretty lanky at 66.9 inches / 170cm, it’s reassuringly stable thanks to its weighted base. It has a simple aesthetic when it’s not in use. The majority of its outer surfaces are plastic apart from the aluminium stand, which appears to have a powder-coated finish.

I can’t help but find the lampshade somewhat uninspiring when not lit up, but that’s simply because I’m obsessed with how pretty it is when the colors are flowing. Nonetheless, it has a nice finish, featuring a combination of clear and smoky black translucent plastics separated by a black band with a matte finish.

(Image credit: Cesci Angell)

A little word of warning: the clear dome of the lampshade is easy to scuff. I accidentally scuffed mine when it gently knocked against the sloped section of my living room ceiling as I was testing the lamp’s stability. It’s not noticeable when the sidelamp is turned on, but I still recommend taking extra care when shifting the Uplighter about.

The Govee Uplighter Floor Lamp had me hooked in seconds with the bright and colorful effects that were projected from its ripple light. The color-shifting sidelight is a satisfying element too, especially for someone as addicted to color as I am. The downlighter proved satisfyingly practical, too, especially with its easy-to-adjust color temperature and brightness settings.

Govee states this lamp can emit up to 1000lm of brightness, and I can confirm that the downlighter makes for convenient task lighting. The uplighter’s brightness means that the ripple effects are beautifully vivid, even during the daytime, and it looks utterly fantastic when ramped up to 100 percent at night.

Image 1 of 4

(Image credit: Cesci Angell)Image 2 of 4

(Image credit: Cesci Angell)Image 3 of 4

(Image credit: Cesci Angell)Image 4 of 4

(Image credit: Cesci Angell)

At the time of writing, only two of the lamp’s elements can be used simultaneously, though I’ve heard murmurings that we may be able to enable all three in the future. This limitation isn’t really an issue, and I’m sure some may consider using all three lights as overkill; however, I’d love it if I didn’t have to sacrifice one of the colorful elements when using the downlighter.

In terms of onboard controls, there are two buttons located on the front of the pole, one for power and the other for switching between scenes and color temperatures. They work just fine, but I primarily use the Govee Home app or my Echo Dot (5th Gen) to control my Uplighter.

Image 1 of 2

(Image credit: Cesci Angell)Image 2 of 2

(Image credit: Cesci Angell)

The Govee Home app is the best app for smart lights I’ve used to date – and I’ve tested a bunch of them. After taking a few moments to sync with the Uplighter, the app gave me access to a range of device settings, including preset features, smart home assistant, and Matter syncing.

More excitingly, there’s a boatload of preset scenes to explore, from multi-colored aurora effects to floating mists from the ripple light, to themed side and downlighter combos. There’s plenty of opportunity to finetune the effects, too, with DIY and AI creation sections, along with adjustable speed settings on many of the existing scenes.

There’s also a super convenient auto-run feature, which is great to have, especially if you don’t own a smart home assistant – it allows you to assign different scenes and settings to specific times of the day.

Image 1 of 3

(Image credit: Cesci Angell)Image 2 of 3

(Image credit: Cesci Angell)Image 3 of 3

(Image credit: Cesci Angell)

In summary, this is a fantastic, multi-functional lamp that makes an eye-catching feature, while also providing adjustable and convenient task lighting. So, if you love the sound of the Govee Uplighter Floor Lamp, I highly recommend purchasing one to experience its mesmerizing and colorful displays for yourself.

If you enjoy getting lost in captivating visuals to help you unwind, but you’re looking for something a little smaller, then I suggest checking out the Govee Table Lamp 2, which offers a huge range of stunning preset scenes, as well as a bunch of customizable settings. Better yet, if you happen to be looking for a smart speaker as well, the Govee Table Lamp 2 Pro comes with built-in JBL sound, and its larger size means there’s more space for all those calming colors to swirl about.

Govee Uplighter Floor Lamp review: Price and specs

Price

$179.99 / £179.99

Model

H60B0

Colors

RGBWW, RGBIC, WW

Lumens

1000lm

Color temperature

2700K-6500K

Dimensions

12.2 x 12.2 x 66.9 inches / 310 x 310 x 170cm

Connectivity

2.4GHz Wi-Fi, Bluetooth

App

Yes

Control methods

App, voice control, pushbutton controls

Additional features

3-in-1 lighting effects, dynamic ripple effect

Should I buy the Govee Uplighter Floor Lamp?Buy it if...

If you love colorful lighting
Whether you’re a color addict like me, or you love unwinding by losing yourself in colorful, sensory-calming visuals, this uplighter will be right up your street.

You want a lamp that’s pretty and practical
With the downlighter’s adjustable temperature and brightness, Govee has struck the perfect balance between attractive lighting effects and practical task lighting with this floor lamp.

Don't buy it if...

You want a subtle floor lamp
While it works well as a task lamp, and the color-changing shade makes for a great feature, the standout feature of this uplighter is its vivid aurora-like projections.

You want a lamp that looks pretty when it’s off
I’ll be honest, I’m scraping the bottom of the barrel a bit here, as I don’t have many negative points on the Uplighter. However, if you’re not into simple, modern lamps, then you might not appreciate the look of this floor lamp when it’s not in action.

Govee Uplighter Floor Lamp review: Also consider

Nanoleaf Smart Multicolor Floor Lamp
If you’d prefer to wash your walls with color instead, and would rather be kinder to your budget, then this colorful column is the perfect choice. This easy-to-assemble wall washer was considered pleasingly sturdy by our reviewer, and its slim design makes it a more discreet option. Like the uplighter, there’s a range of scenes and DIY settings to explore, and it’s easy to control via its app and voice control via your smart home system. If you’d like to learn more, check out our full Nanoleaf Smart Multicolor Floor Lamp review.

How I tested the Govee Uplighter Floor Lamp

• I used the Govee Uplighter Floor Lamp regularly over a few weeks
• I tested the different features and customizable settings
• I observed the brightness and visibility of the scenes in light and dark environments

I used the Govee Uplighter Floor Lamp to light up my bedroom and living room ceilings with colorful loveliness for a few weeks. I also used the downlighter as a gentle source of light in the evening, as well as task lighting whenever required.

I explored all of the Uplighter’s features, trying out the different preset scenes, creating my own, and experimenting with various lamp combinations.

I used the app regularly for customization, but I mostly used voice control to power it on and off, via my Amazon Echo Dot.

I used the Govee Uplighter Floor Lamp in my living room most days, and moved it to my bedroom so that I could enjoy the calming ripple effect lighting while lying in bed. I used it on sunny days and at night, so that I could assess how visible the effects were with various levels of ambient light.

• First reviewed: November 2025
• Read more about how we test

Ever fancied having a graphic design team at your fingertips to help your business with branding, marketing and reach, but can’t afford to hire more people? How about a customizable AI service instead? This is what the amazingly named “design.com" aims to offer (incredible that URL was still available).

Design.com: Pricing & plans

(Image credit: Design.com // Future)

• Barely any free templates, but at least you can try all the tools before choosing a subscription plan

Although you can explore all of what Design.com has to offer, and experiment with all of its tools to your heart’s content, you’ll find this service is primarily a paid one. Sure, you’ll spot the odd free design here and there, discernible by a ‘free’ moniker top left of a template’s thumbnail, but sadly, those are few and far between.

When it comes to choosing a paid tier to suit your needs, I found the choices to be somewhat confusing, as the plans on offer differ depending on the services you’re using.

For instance, working in the logo section will bring up ‘Premium Logo Pack’ or ‘Premium Logo Pack + Website’, ranging from €3 to €6 per month, billed annually (paying on a month by month basis is considerably more expensive: from €9 to €14).

However, if you come from the YouTube Banner, Instagram Post or T-Shirt sections, say, you only have one option: ‘Premium Account’, for €5 a month billed annually, or €9 on a month by month basis, yet both ‘Premium Account’ and ‘Premium Logo Pack’ allow you to edit posts, logos and more… Why the discrepancy, in tier name and cost, depending on which service you start from?

I must note that over the days I spent experimenting with this service, these options changed: there used to be three different tiers coming from the logo service, and two from the others, so it might be possible that they will have changed again once you try the service out for yourself.

Design.com: Categories & templates

(Image credit: Design.com // Future)

• A wealth of different categories, with hundreds of templates for each. It’s very easy to navigate through them all.

Design.com certainly is feature packed. It’s a logo maker, sure, but it also offers you the ability to create business cards, posters, flyers, banners for YouTube and LinkedIn, Facebook and Instagram posts and stories, email signatures, entire websites, T-shirts, and more.

The platform's focus is on allowing AI to do the bulk of the work for you, with customizations available further down the line if they’re needed. The aim here is to offer you a design so good, you don’t need to do anything to it, except insert your business's info.

The way it works is incredibly simple: at the top of the page is a menu-bar, broken down by category, with options within each category being quite vast. If this feels too clinical for you, scroll down the main page instead to browse through a list of the most common services, with big friendly images and description of what to expect.

Remember: the vast majority of the templates will have to be paid for. Only a handful are available for free, and as you’d expect, they won’t be the flashiest, nicest looking ones. Still, free is free. You’re also able to explore and customize all templates, even the premium ones, as you only get to the paywall when you’ve finalized your design, giving you a good opportunity to try out every feature.

If you’re on the lookout for a free logo and don’t fancy scrolling through the long list hoping to find the handful of free templates available, click here to see the free designs and not the premium ones.

Design.com: Choices

(Image credit: Design.com // Future)

• So many choices increases the odds you’ll find the perfect AI creation for you. You’re given a few basic customization options, with the more in-depth alterations saved for another part of the service

Looking through Design.com’s vast choices can be overwhelming, although the developers have gone to great lengths to keep the results focused on what you’re looking for.

To make this work, once you’ve selected the type of service you’re after (be it a poster, website, post, business card, logo, etc), you’ll need to enter a list of keywords so the website’s AI can get to work. There are exceptions to this, like the Business Card or Logo sections, for instance, which request your business name instead.

If you have a logo already designed, you can upload it at the same time, and it’ll be integrated into the results.

Once you click on the big blue ‘Start Now’ button, you’ll be instantly given dozens of variations based on your business name and/or keywords. Actually scratch that: that’s just the first page: scroll down to the bottom and you’ll find hundreds of additional pages waiting for you, which means you have thousands of templates to choose from, which you can narrow down with a selection of filters, additional keywords and searches.

Click on the one you like best to select it and be taken to the next steps, which include changing the template’s default colours, altering the text (or let AI write something for you), and finally select a layout from a choice of six, if the original one wasn’t to your liking.

If this is as much editing as you have the time or inclination for, click on Download to claim your prize… or so I might’ve hoped. I’ve already covered that most templates aren’t free, but if you’re working on one that is, you'll have to jump through a lot of hoops to get it. I lost count of how many pages offering me special (paid) deals I had to skip through in order to finally be able to download my file.

Design.com: Customization & export

(Image credit: Design.com // Future)

• The level of customization is high, giving you full control over your creation - although that’s solely reserved for paying customers. As for exporting your work, the number of options on offer is broad.

Keeping it simple is great and a very useful timesaver, but if you have specific ideas not reflected by the AI results, you’ll be pleased to learn these designs are fully customisable, although be aware this feature is for paying customers only.

You have access to the full layout, being able to move and resize and even rotate any object present on the template. You can even bring in new shapes and clip art should you want to.

Altering an item’s colour is just a click away, you have full control over text boxes, from style, to format, to font. It’s all fun and easy to use. If you’re familiar with Canva, you’ll feel right at home here.

Whether you customized your layout or not, now’s the time to download it. The choices you have are refreshingly vast, and this also applies to the free templates you might elect to use.

Being able to download the full design is a given, but you also have the option of exporting a version with a transparent background, or to just get the icon, solely grab the text, or turn the whole creation into greyscale. You even have a choice of format, from JPG, PNG, SVG, EPS or PDF.

This level of choice is most welcome as it can allow people to edit the design further elsewhere, should they want to.

Should I buy Design.com?

Buy it if...

You’re looking for a service that uses AI to generate designs for your business at a fraction of what it would cost to maintain a creative team. There’s a handful of free templates, as well as reasonable subscription rates to gain access to all templates and full customization control.

Don't buy it if...

You want total creative control over your designs without AI input. And the free options feel pretty meagre compared to the more lavish premium templates.

For more options, we've tested and reviewed the best logo makers and the best free logo makers.

There are few bigger names in antivirus and security than Norton, and that makes Norton 360 Deluxe one of the obvious choices for anyone who needs affordable, all-encompassing home security.

And with AV, scam protection, a VPN and dark web monitoring all included in this product alongside a bundle of other features, it’s easy to see why Norton’s tools continue to prove popular.

But with dozens of other products offering similar functionality, including competing security suites from big names like Bitdefender and Sophos, it’s worth taking a deep dive into the app to discover if Norton 360 Deluxe is still your best option – or if it’s been overtaken by more ambitious rivals.

The latest feature to arrive in Norton 360 Deluxe is Genie Scam Protection – a timely addition given how many people are understandably caught out by sophisticated and compelling online scams. This AI-powered feature is designed to cut through the noise and give users clear, straightforward answers about suspicious messages.

Elsewhere, Norton 360 Deluxe includes a familiar range of features. Real-time threat protection, a smart firewall, secure VPN and password manager are all normal additions to a home security suite, and Norton 360 goes further by including parental controls, dark web monitoring, webcam protection and more.

Norton 360 Deluxe looks very cheap in year one (but beware the renewal costs). (Image credit: Norton)Norton 360 Deluxe: Pricing

Norton 360 is available in four different tiers – 360 Deluxe is the third option available. It costs $49.99 for one year of access that protects five PCs, Macs, tablets or phones, and 360 Deluxe includes antivirus, malware, ransomware and hacking protection, Genie Scam protection, a password manager, a VPN, Dark Web monitoring and parental controls.

It also includes deepfake protection, although that feature is only available for Windows devices that have a Copilot+ licence and Qualcomm Snapdragon X processor.

It’s a comprehensive selection, but there are options if you don’t need every feature or if you’d like to save money. And while you do get cloud backup, at this level you only get 50GB – hardly enough to back up your entire PC.

Norton 360 Standard protects three devices, only includes 2GB of cloud backup and doesn’t include parental controls and it costs $39.99 per year – it’s a more affordable option if you don’t have children and if you don’t need any cloud storage.

The entry-level product, Norton AntiVirus Plus, protects a single device and doesn’t include a VPN or Dark Web Monitoring. It costs $29.99 for an annual subscription, and it remains a capable entry-level security tool.

If you decide that 360 Deluxe doesn’t offer enough functionality for you, then you can pay $99.99 annually for Norton 360 Select Plus with LifeLock. You’ll get protection for 10 devices, 250GB of cloud backup, and a host of identity protections including a privacy monitor, identity theft protection, stolen wallet protection, social security alerts, credit monitoring and up to $25,000 in stolen funds reimbursement.

For busy families who want a complete level of coverage, including additions that protect identities and finances, that’s the best choice. And if you explore Norton’s plans beyond the 360 range, you’ll delve into specific products – like security for gamers or a dedicated VPN – and products designed for businesses rather than consumers.

One thing to bear in mind, though – you’ll have to enter payment details even if you just want to try Norton’s 30-day free trial, so remember to cancel that if you don’t want to continue using the product beyond that date.

After a speedy install, Norton 360 Deluxe walked us through setting up its various components. (Image credit: Future)Norton 360 Deluxe: Interface

Norton’s interface is good, even if it’s a little busier than some products – an app like Bitdefender Total Security is cleaner and potentially less overwhelming at first glance.

Load Norton 360 Deluxe and you’re greeted with an update about your traffic status, a control panel that grants quick access to scans, scam protection, the secure VPN, private browser and more, and another tab with alerts.

On the left-hand side there’s a navigation panel that opens up the app’s various modules and settings, and at the bottom of the main window is an unsightly advert that invites you to upgrade to Norton Utilities Ultimate. There’s even a link to the Store where you can upgrade to various other Norton utilities if you feel the need to invest in extra functionality.

The interface is busy and the upselling is unpleasant, but there’s nothing truly bad here – it’ll just take a little while to remember where everything is.

In the Security menu you’ll find options to scan, deploy cloud backup, configure parental controls and open the password manager, and you can dive into the advanced settings menu to activate or remote specific features. The Performance menu is a little sparse – it just includes PC cleanup tools – and the Identity area only includes a link to the Dark Web monitoring module.

In the Privacy part of the app, you can open and configure the VPN and camera protection tools, and in the Settings menu you can tweak notifications, app permissions and more.

And, thankfully, the installation process is better. It’s clear and straightforward, even giving you time estimates for the install, the time it’ll take for setting up your protection and for an initial scan. Norton gives you a warning if there are any conflicting apps on your system, too.

When you boot Norton 360 Deluxe for the first time, you also get the option of running through a five-step setup process that configures dark web monitoring, cloud backup, VPN usage, protecting another device and setting up your password manager.

It’s a neat wizard that ticks many of the protection boxes beyond straightforward scanning, and it’s a welcome addition for newcomers.

Buttons, icons, captions, colors - the Norton interface tries to convey perhaps too much. (Image credit: Future)

AV-Test lab results for Windows 11, August 2025 (Image credit: AV-Test)Norton 360 Deluxe: Antivirus Lab Test Results

Norton 360 Deluxe has a familiar range of antivirus abilities, including real-time threat detection that continuously scans for viruses, malware and phishing attempts, no matter what you’re doing with your device – a tremendous first line of defence against new and emerging threats.

Elsewhere, Norton’s firewall monitors and blocks suspicious network traffic without bothering users – it’s one of the best around, and includes loads of options for customisation, including options to block specific networks and devices, control access for particular apps and tweak traffic rules.

Norton’s app also features ransomware and hacking protection and anti-phishing browser extensions for Chrome, Firefox and Edge, but you’re out of luck if you want to use a browser beyond those three.

AV-Comparatives’ September 2025 Performance Test evaluates the impact of antivirus software on system performance – a crucial metric if you want a security tool that won’t make your system sluggish when you’re running scans.

These tests incorporate file copying and archiving, app installations and launches, file downloads and web browsing – all common use cases, and situations where you won’t want a security product like Norton to slow you down.

And, thankfully, Norton performed well here. Its Impact Score of 3.8 is excellent, and the second-best in the entire test – only Kaspersky had less system impact than Norton. Unfortunately, Kaspersky has been shunned by the western-world due to being headquartered in Moscow.

In the results, Norton’s performance was recorded as “Very Fast” in every category tested. It’s enough to earn Norton 360 Deluxe an “Advanced+ Performance” badge from AV-Comparatives.

Norton’s performance on mobile impressed, too, with low battery drain on Android.

In AV Test’s August 2025 benchmarking, Norton remained impressive, with a perfect score of 6/6 for system performance.

Norton 360 Deluxe performed better than the industry average when launching websites and installing apps and matched the industry average when downloading apps and copying files. Its only slight stumble came when launching apps, but the performance hit wasn’t huge.

We assess every antivirus with our own in-depth tests. (Image credit: Future)Norton 360 Deluxe: Malware protection

Norton’s level of protection impressed, too. AV-Comparatives’ February-May 2025 Real World Protection Test simulates malware attacks to assess detection, protection and false positives, and Norton performed reasonably well.

It picked up eight false positives and one user-dependent false positive for an overall score of 8.5. That’s not as good as some other big hitters, like apps from Kaspersky, Bitdefender or Avira, but it’s still better than the industry average – and software from companies like AVG, Avast and Panda.

In the overall benchmark, AV-Comparatives sent 423 test cases at the security products under scrutiny, and Norton blocked 421 of those threats for a protection rate of 99.5%. That’s level with Avast, Malwarebytes, Trend Micro and a handful of other tools and barely behind Bitdefender – so, in short, it’s a very good result.

As with system impact tests, these results were enough to earn Norton a top grade of Advanced+. And you can expect similarly impressive protection if you’re using Norton on other platforms, too: its protection rate of 99.9% on Android is superb, and its Mac malware and unwanted applications detection rates of 100% and 99% are fantastic.

Unsurprisingly, Norton continued to perform well in AV Test’s benchmarks, too. It scored a perfect 6/6 in the Protection category, with 100% detection of malware attacks, and it didn’t return any false blockages, detections or warnings, either – so Norton 360 Deluxe’s reliability isn’t in question.

Norton 360 Deluxe isn’t the only product to perform this well: tools from Avira, Bitdefender, Avast, McAfee and a handful of others returned similarly impressive results. But if you end up investing in Norton 360 Deluxe, you can be sure that you’re getting a top-notch level of protection.

Norton 360 successfully blocked our ransomware simulator – eventually. (Image credit: Future)Norton 360 Deluxe: Other features

Norton 360 Deluxe’s other features are just as good. 360 Deluxe includes a full and unrestricted VPN – unlike Bitdefender with its 200mb daily usage limits – and it’s very easy to use, with “on” and “off” buttons clearly indicated. You can easily change location and let the app choose locations based on speed or P2P preferences, and you can opt to have the VPN connect automatically when you boot and kill the internet entirely if the VPN’s connection is interrupted.

Bear in mind that usage of older protocols in the background mean that standalone VPN products will generally be faster. But Norton 360 Deluxe’s VPN is easily fast enough for daily home use.

Dark web monitoring trawls the internet for your bank account, gamer tags, email addresses, phone numbers, insurance details and home addresses – it even scours the web for information about your passport and drivers licence. It’s a thorough system, and fast, too, with instant notifications if your data is spotted in a breach.

The included parental control module needs to be activated separately to 360 Deluxe, and it includes options to set screen time limits, block apps and websites and use real-time location monitoring on child devices. Management is handled through a web console, and there are over 45 different content categories that you can filter out.

There are also options to block sites during school hours, enable safe search and see full reports of your child’s online behavior.

It’s a solid option for parental controls, but you’ll find more power and innovation in dedicated parental control tools.

Elsewhere, Norton includes a password manager that supports multi-factor authentication – but, again, shop around if you want high-end features beyond standard inclusions. And while you get cloud backup with Norton 360 Deluxe, you don’t get the option to perform local or network-based backups.

You can install Norton’s Chromium-based private browser, use tools to keep software updated, clean up junk files and manage your PC’s boot processes, and use SafeCam to protect your webcam and microphone from remote access.

It’s a welcome range of features, if conventional, but it’s worth noting that Norton 360 Deluxe is one of the few antivirus suites that does a great job for mac OS users – it includes antivirus, the firewall, VPN, the private browser and a few other tools.

That’s an impressive array of options for Apple users, but you still don’t get parental controls or cloud backup.

This story is repeated on mobile platforms, too: Norton’s Android app is excellent and packed with features, and the iOS option is better than most – even if you still miss out on some peripheral options and tools.

Norton 360 Deluxe: Final verdict

There’s lots to like about Norton 360 Deluxe. Its antivirus performance is excellent – and it does a great job of protecting your technology without slowing down your devices. The pricing is good, too, with standard pricing and offers that help Norton regularly undercut its rivals.

It’s packed with functionality elsewhere, too, from its dark web monitoring and safe browsing to its unrestricted VPN, scam protection and cloud backup. Some features, like the parental control and password management modules, aren’t particularly innovative – but they work well, and they’re ideal for individuals or families who need effective, straightforward protection.

Bitdefender Total Security is a bit stronger for pure protection, and some other products offer more in terms of innovation. But Norton 360 Deluxe is an excellent all-rounder, especially for families – and it’s easy to see why it’s one of the biggest names in the industry.

Sirui SVM-145P: two-minute review

Monopods are useful camera supports in a range of situations, and many tripods come with a detachable leg that can be converted into a monopod, a system that works extremely well. With this in mind, you might wonder why you'd need to buy a dedicated monopod. In a nutshell, the answer is that monopods like the Sirui SVM-145P bring something much more versatile and robust to the table.

Monopods are essentially a single tripod leg that can be used to provide stability, enabling you to shoot at slower shutter speeds than you could handheld. Plus, the SVM-145P has three metal feet to provide additional stability, making it perfect for video capture when you only need a simple camera support rather than the greater stability of a slower-to-use full-size video tripod.

As the name suggests, this is a monopod with a maximum height of 145cm, or 57.1 inches, while the P signifies ‘pedal’. The pedal is used to quickly release the lock at the bottom of the monopod to allow for 20 degrees of tilt and 360 degrees of rotation, providing the movement you need when the three metal feet are being used for stability.

An interesting feature is that there’s a friction control, which allows you to control how loose or restricted these two movements are. This is useful when shooting video because it allows for smoother pans and tilts.

You can, of course, attach a fluid tripod head for video and use this for panning rather than the monopod itself. My only criticism of the friction control is that the dial at the top of the feet section is itself stiff to turn. Stiff is good to avoid movements caused by accidental knocks, but it’s arguably too stiff.

Image 1 of 5

(Image credit: James Abbott)Image 2 of 5

(Image credit: James Abbott)Image 3 of 5

(Image credit: James Abbott)Image 4 of 5

(Image credit: James Abbott)Image 5 of 5

(Image credit: James Abbott)

You can, of course, keep the feet folded up, in which configuration the SVM-145P performs like a standard monopod with a rubber foot at the bottom that can also be rotated to reveal a spike. The feet can also be removed from the monopod, which reduces size and weight when you require only basic functionality.

Moving on to the minimum height of the SVM-145P, the minimum in monopod mode is 77cm / 30.3 inches, which isn’t particularly low. The SVM-145P, however, has another trick up its sleeve: quick-release feet and the mounting plate where a tripod head can be attached.

These can then be put together to create a desktop / mini tripod, which is roughly 20cm / 7.87 inches. The mounting plate also features a 1/4-inch or 3/8-inch self-adaptive thread to allow tripod heads with either thread size to be attached.

The desktop tripod's minimum height isn’t listed in the specs, only the minimum heights of the basic monopod and monopod-plus-feet configuration. Adding a tripod head to the feet with the base attached will inevitably increase the minimum height, but it remains low to the ground, or not too high when positioned on a desk or table. There’s no denying that it’s a useful and interesting feature for a monopod.

Operation of the SVM-145P is quick and easy, with a simple twist lock at the top for extending and retracting the monopod. Plus, there’s the quick-release mounting plate for switching between monopod and desktop modes.

The aim of this design is speed of operation, and it certainly achieves this. The ability to move the SVM-145P quickly and to easily set it up in seconds also makes it suitable for fast-paced shooting situations. It’s undoubtedly much quicker to set up than a tripod, for instance.

Image 1 of 4

(Image credit: James Abbott)Image 2 of 4

(Image credit: James Abbott)Image 3 of 4

(Image credit: James Abbott)Image 4 of 4

(Image credit: James Abbott)

As far as monopods go, this one is pretty chunky, with the thickest tube having a 36mm / 1.42-inch diameter. The weight of the SVM-145P without a head is 1.49kg / 3.3lbs, so once a head is attached, it’s going to weigh as much as many travel tripods.

When you remove the metal feet, the overall weight is reduced by 720g / 1.6lbs. The maximum payload of the monopod is 10kg / 22lbs, which will include the tripod head if you attach one, but leaves plenty of room for many camera and lens combinations.

The SVM-145P doesn’t come with a head included. This frees you to choose your own head, as well as providing the ability to use different heads depending on what and how you’re shooting. This is standard in the world of mid-to-higher-end tripods and monopods, but more and more travel tripods come with a ball head included, which does reduce overall cost.

My biggest issues with the SVM-145P are that it weighs as much as some travel tripods that have multi-functionality, including monopod and desktop tripod modes, and the cost. The build quality and functionality are fantastic for a monopod, but it also costs the same as many travel tripods, which also come with a head included.

Sirui SVM-145P: key specs

Head

Purchased separately

Leg sections

Three

Height

770mm – 1450mm / 30.3 inches – 57.1 inches

Weight

1.53kg / 3.4lbs

Max Payload

10kg / 22.04lbs

Material

Carbon fiber

Sirui SVM-145P: Price and availability

The Sirui SVM-145P is available now and costs $274 / £239, which puts it in a similar price range to many travel tripods, and the SVM-145P doesn’t even include a tripod head. You can use the monopod without a head, which is ideal when using it to support larger telephoto lenses, but for general photo and video capture a tripod head does improve handling and control.

With this in mind, the SVM-145P is quite expensive. On the other hand, it’s much more feature-packed than a basic monopod or one that’s just a converted tripod leg. If you’re looking for a high-quality monopod and will get plenty of use from it, this could be a fantastic option to consider. If, however, you only need to use a monopod occasionally, you might be better off with a cheaper alternative.

There are also several other monopods available in the SVM range, with different heights, with and without the foot pedal that allows you to switch between a locked monopod and pan and tilt movements when the feet are in use. This means you can choose the height and functionality that works best for you, but as the model that loosely sits in the middle, the SVM-145P is likely to be one of the more popular options in the range.

Sirui SVM-145P: Also consider

Peak Design Pro Tripod

There are three Peak Design Pro Tripod models available, and this excellent travel tripod doesn't come cheap. Its design allows for a compact folded size, while optional ‘mods’ allow you to increase video functionality if required.

Read our Peak Design Pro Tripod review

Heipi 3-in-1 Travel Tripod

The Heipi 3-in-1 Travel Tripod is a small and lightweight travel tripod featuring an innovative design, and the ability to support multiple camera types, including smartphones. The tripod also incorporates a mini tripod into the overall design, adding to its usefulness when traveling.

Read our Heipi 3-in-1 Travel Tripod review

Should I buy the Sirui SVM-145P?

(Image credit: James Abbott)Buy it if...

You need speed

This monopod can be operated quickly and provides the support you need in a range of shooting situations.

You need portability

If you don’t need the full support of a tripod, monopods are often more compact, although this one is as heavy as travel tripods.

Don't buy it if...

You need greater support

If you need full camera support for capturing long exposures, for example, you’ll need a tripod rather than a monopod.

You’re on a budget

If you’re on a budget, you can buy cheaper and more basic monopods. Plus, many tripods have a convertible leg for monopod use.

How I tested the Sirui SVM-145P

• I tested it in all configurations
• I used it with different camera and lens combinations
• I tested it with and without a tripod head

I tested the Sirui SVM-145P for more than a week in situations when a monopod is the most appropriate solution, using it to capture both a range of photographic subjects and video. I also tested it alongside a travel tripod, so that I could directly compare the pros and cons of each system.

First reviewed October 2025

Majority Folio: Two-minute review

Given that vinyl records often feel like they belong in the Smithsonian, actually using them for music can seem like a scary proposition, and what doesn't help is how fiddly and delicate some of the best turntables can seem. Newbies to the vinyl game can find many reasons to stay away, but I'm here to offer one good reason to come over: the Majority Folio.

This record player – for amplification and speaker are both onboard, squirrelled away into the base – is here to downplay those reasons, and make listening to your collection (relatively) simple.

This is the joint-third turntable from British audio company Majority, following the Majority Moto 2.0 and releasing simultaneously with the pricier Stylo.

Like its predecessor, the Folio is an inexpensive turntable, and it also totes a built-in speaker, which means you don't need to buy a separate one (or indeed any phono stage or pre/power amplifiers) to hear your music. These facts alone make the device really easy to buy for people scared to take the plunge.

But beyond that it's easy to set up and use, and won't be scary for new users to experiment with. And once you decide to flesh out your hi-fi setup, the Majority Folio's support for many outputs and inputs means that unlike many cheap vinyl players, it actually can remain a central part of your kit and won't need to be replaced any time soon.

You may want to upgrade things though, because the Folio's speaker doesn't actually sound that great; it's fine as a starting-off point, or for people who aren't already too used to the fantastic audio that high-end kit can put out, but it retains all the issues of its predecessor in that it lacks a solid, weighty and impactful low-end and doesn't provide quality audio overall.

Another gripe I have with the Folio is that a few design choices show a lack of precision. The dust cover doesn't fit perfectly, and the turntable's wooden surface showed up bumps and scratches really easy. These didn't affect playback, but it's still not ideal.

One novel feature I need to bring up in the introduction is that you can plug a USB stick into the Folio and rip/record your vinyl record onto it. This can be great for digitizing your record collection, but you could also use it to create your own mix-tapes (you can split the recording and break it up by track, changing vinyl while you do) or re-record your favorites at a shifted pitch... for some reason. It's a feature with admittedly limited appeal, but I can see it being a game-changer for some music creators.

Majority Folio review: Price and release date

• Announced on April 12, 2025
• Sells for £169.95 (roughly $220, AU$340)
• No US or AUS availability

The Majority Folio was announced on Record Store Day, which was April 12, 2025. It went on sale shortly afterward.

You can buy the turntable for £169.95 (roughly $220 / AU$340), although it’s only available in certain regions, including the UK. Majority’s turntables don’t tend to go on sale in the US, and while they do in Australia, the Folio isn’t currently offered in the region.

That price puts the Folio as one of the more affordable turntables on the market, a great budget buy for people who don’t have the big bucks to invest in a fancy home hi-fi system but want something solid to play vinyl.

(Image credit: Future)Majority Folio review: Specs

Dimensions

41.2 x 32.3 x 14.2cm

Motor

Belt drive

Platter

Die-cast metal

Phono preamp

Yes

USB

Input & recording

Bluetooth

5.3

Speeds

33, 45RPM

Stylus

AT3600L

Extras

45RPM adapter, RCA cable, rubber mat, replacement belt

(Image credit: Future)Majority Folio review: Features

• Easy to set-up and use
• Range of connection options
• USB recording feature

The Majority Folio seems designed as a plug-and-play dream; thanks to having its own speaker you don’t need to fuss over connecting other devices or extras, and simply plugging it into a power point is your first and last act to get it running. Well, you’ve got to add the record too, and it’s not an automatic turntable so you'll need to place the needle yourself; the record begins to spin as soon as you lift the arm.

Despite having its own speaker, and therefore being less reliant on external speakers to work, the Majority Folio offers quite a few connection options. You can pair to nearby Bluetooth speakers or wireless headphones with Bluetooth 5.3 (to transmit your vinyl wirelessly for playback, thus bypassing the Folio's inbuilt speaker), play via an AUX cord, output music from a USB stick or plug in other devices with RCA, and so the Folio can stand alone or be the nexus of a hi-fi set-up. Most of these options let you output the vinyl music, but also use the device’s speaker for other inputs.

In somewhat of a novelty, you can plug a USB stick into the Folio and record your vinyl recording onto it. It’s a neat way of digitizing your music, especially with the ability to split a recording (ie, break it up by song), although the quality isn’t exactly stellar. If you change the playback speed of a record, this is reflected in your recording, but tweaking the volume isn't.

• Features score: 4/5

(Image credit: Future)Majority Folio review: Sound quality

• AT3600L cartridge in play
• Build-in speaker lacks quality
• Output sounds a lot better

At the end of the arm is an AT3600L Moving Magnetic Cartridge, a piece of kit Majority has used before. And there’s no shame in that, especially not when the first two letters stand for Audio-Technica; this is a fine-tuned piece of kit. We've seen it grace plenty of other budget options and it provides fun audio, if lacking some high-fidelity flair of higher-end options.

One of the unique selling points of the Majority Folio is that it comes with its own speaker as part of the package; if you’re at the first step of your home audio journey and don’t have a hi-fi set-up, you can use the Folio out of the box…

… although I’d recommend against it, if you can avoid it. Music from the built-in speaker sounds a bit tinny, lacking deep bass or crisp treble, and that's not just true of phono playback but for Bluetooth playing too. I couldn’t help but feel that lots of the depth, detail and nuance that the vinyl format provided, was lost when played through the main speaker. As I write this, I’m listening to Bowie’s Space Oddity, and it’s hard to make out much of the song besides the vocals, strings and cymbals.

Thankfully, as I’ve mentioned, the Folio has a range of connectivity options, and I’m pleased to report that music sounds better from headphones or other speakers. The low end has a lot more weight (even accounting for the toning of other devices), high-end is crisper and there’s a full-bodied midrange which adds to the sense of detail on a song. It’s not going to wow audiophiles who’ve tested top-end equipment, but I’d question how many such buyers have made it this far into the review anyway!

There’s nothing strictly wrong with the built-in speaker if you’re at the beginning of your home hi-fi journey, but it’s not something I’d rely on in the long run.

It’s worth noting that, according to the website and user manual, the Folio doesn’t support high-quality or low latency Bluetooth codecs. So I’d recommend buying wired speakers (see TechRadar's guide to the best stereo speakers here) if you want to appreciate your music to the best standards.

(Image credit: Future)

• Sound quality score: 3.5/5

Majority Folio review: Design

• Chunky, thanks to built-in speaker
• Lots of dials, ports, switches
• Easily gains knicks

As you can probably expect from a turntable with a speaker built in, the Majority Folio is a little bit bigger than some rivals on the market, and it adds this heft in the height department. It’s 14.2cm tall, 41.2cm wide and 32.3cm length-wise. And if we’re going through dimensions, it weighs 3.7kg.

The device has a classy look, with a nice wooden finish, although this material quickly showed some marks and splintering on my review unit. An S-shaped tonearm is light and nimble, though looks a little too much like a Mechano set towards the needle, which blocked my sight of the needle from certain angles (and I'm bad at placing it at the best of times). The party is at the back though with an easily-manipulated counterweight and RPM toggle hidden away from the plate.

The table begins to spin automatically, as soon as you lift the needle, but the arm cradle wasn’t totally reliable at holding the limb in place; a few times I accidentally bumped the arm and the record began to spin of its own accord. A cradle with a slight edge would fix this problem.

Elsewhere on the body you’re getting an RPM adapter plonked to the side, and then on the right edge a headphone jack as well as dials for the volume, pitch and input method. It’s a little more cluttered than some other turntables I’ve seen, but I prefer ease of use with your many functions, toggles and switches in plain view.

That’s only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the Majority Folio’s buttons and dials. On the right edge there’s a USB slot as well as buttons for recording, splitting and Bluetooth pairing, while on the back there’s the range of connection inputs we’ve already discussed. Perhaps one of the benefits of a big body, is lots of room for ports and buttons.

Like most (but not all) alternatives, the Folio has a dust cover. It does its job but it’s a little wobbly, often not sitting straight on the turntable, and it quickly got quite scuffed up during my testing.

(Image credit: Future)

• Design score: 4/5

Majority Folio review: Value

Based on the price, specs and feature set, the Majority is a great entry-level turntable for people at the beginning of their hi-fi journey.

It’s a purchase comparable to those guitar starter-packs you can buy, which get you a budget amp, carry case and cables alongside a cheapie six-string; none of the kit is stellar, but you’re getting a nice easy package to get you started. The further you get into your hi-fi journey, the more you can augment your setup with extra speakers.

There are a few turntables on the market that are cheaper than the Majority, but most don’t have the speaker built in, giving this an easy value win.

• Value score: 4.5/5

(Image credit: Future)Should I buy the Majority Folio?Majority Folio score card

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Features

A range of connection options, and easy to use.

4/5

Sound quality

Built-in speaker isn't perfect, but there's a fun sound in general.

3.5/5

Design

Its big size facilitates its many features; it shows its wear readily though.

4/5

Value

It's great value for what you're getting (and what you don't need to get).

4.5/5

Buy it if…

You're on a limited budget
If you buy the Folio, you don't need to buy extra speakers or players if you don't want. One purchase and you're done.

You want to digitize your record collection
The USB recording feature is a neat way to transfer your old vinyl records into a more digital form, or record your own mix tape.

You need something easy to use
While it's not an automatic turntable, the Majority Folio is simple to use and doesn't need endless tweaking or tinkering.

Don’t buy it if…

You've got limited shelf space
Thanks to its speaker, the Majority Folio is a pretty bulky piece of kit which takes up a fair amount of space on a shelf.

You need top-quality audio
People who want to get every drop of audio goodness from their records will want to spend a lot more on their kit.

Majority Folio review: Also consider

Majority Folio

Audio-Technica AT-LP70XBT

House of Marley Revolution

Dimensions

412 x 323 x 142mm

110 x 400 x 330mm

112 x 389 x 328mm

Motor

Belt drive

Belt drive

Belt drive

Platter

Die-cast metal

Aluminium

Plastic

Phono preamp

Yes

Yes

Yes

USB

Input & recording

No

No

Bluetooth

5.3

5.2

5.3

Speeds

33 1/3, 45RPM

33 1/3, 45RPM

33 1/3, 45, 78RPM

Cartridge

AT3600L

AT-VMN95C

AT3600L

Extras

Dust cover, rubber mat, 45 adapter, RCA cable.

Dust cover, felt mat, 45 adapter, 1m RCA cable

Dust cover, felt mat, 45 adapter

Audio-Technica AT-LP70XBT
We rate the AT-LP70XBT as our favorite budget turntable, though it costs a little more than the Folio. It's easy to use, sounds decent and doesn't break the bank, making it a solid beginner turntable.
Read our Audio-Technica AT-LP70XBT review here.

House of Marley Revolution
Another highly-rated beginner turntable, which undercuts the Folio, comes from HoM. It has the same cartridge as the Folio so you're getting a similar audio profile.
Read our House of Marley Revolution review here.

How I tested the Majority Folio

(Image credit: Future)

• Tested for three weeks
• Inputs include vinyl records, Bluetooth and USB
• Outputs include built-in speaker and wired headphones and speakers

I used the Majority Folio for three weeks in order to write this review, and through the whole process it was set up in my living room (which is also my dining room and kitchen; it's not a big apartment).

I primarily listened to music from my large vinyl record library, though also used the speaker's Bluetooth playback function and also listened to recordings I'd made with the USB recording function.

For most of the testing period, I listened through the build-in speaker, but for additional listening I plugged in some over-ear headphones and some wireless speakers to get a sense for the sound.

• First reviewed November 2025

SiteGround is now over 20 years old and is one of the world's largest independently owned hosting companies. They started off with a handful of staff and have grown to have 500 talented employees and data centers in six continents used by over 3,000,000 domains.

SiteGround are world leaders when it comes to hosting technologies. In 2009 they revolutionised shared hosting making it safer for businesses and have created numerous optimizations for WordPress. SiteGround have been using Google cloud servers for their infrastructure since 2020 which gives the added bonus of easier scalability and even more reliability. Plus, Google match 100% of their energy usage with renewable power. So, SiteGround are green too.

The support offered by SiteGround is also word leading. The top 2% of candidates for the team spend over 6 months in specialist training and on average over 90% of tickets get resolved at first contact.

SiteGround has traditionally been for WordPress sites. Even the cloud hosting plans which appear more like VPS plans are restricted are more focused towards WordPress. SiteGround are stepping out of this area though and also now offer their own website builder.

For speed, reliability, and service, SiteGround are up there as one of the best hosting services. You don't get as much storage as standard compared with competitors but if you don't require bottomless buckets you should find everything you need for a hosting provider in SiteGround.

(Image credit: Future)What types of hosting does SiteGround offer?

SiteGround market their products in two main categories: Web Hosting and Cloud Hosting. They also provide reseller hosting, WordPress hosting, and email marketing plans. The reseller plans and WordPress hosting are very similar to the web hosting plans.

Web Hosting from SiteGround comes in three tiers: StartUp, GrowBig, and GoGeek.
These plans don't state what resources you get but rather what they're capable of delivering. The main differences between the plans are storage, speed, support, and the number of websites you can host.

The lowest plan, StartUp, supports one website, 10GB of web space, 10,000 monthly visits, a free domain, free SSL, daily backups, free CDN, free email, and more. For new signups this costs $2.99/mo for 12 months and then renews at $17.99 a month.

GrowBig is essentially the same but supports unlimited websites, 100,000 monthly visits and 30% faster PHP. You also get an extra 10GB of space, on demand backups and staging. This comes at $4.99/mo for new signups and renews at $29.99/mo. For $44.99/mo after renewal, you can get up to 400,000 monthly visits, and priority support with the GoGeek plan.

SiteGround's Cloud hosting range has four tiers: Jumpstart, Business, Business Plus, and SuperPower with prices from $100/mo to $400/mo. CPU and memory start at 4 CPU cores and 8GB of RAM and both jump incrementally by four for each additional tier with SuperPower providing 16 CPU cores and 20GB RAM. Your resources are guaranteed and managed and you can scale your CPU and RAM with one click or automatically.

A migration tool, SG Migrate, is provided by SiteGround as a free WordPress plugin. The idea is straightforward: if you’re migrating data from an old WordPress site to a new one, you install the plugin on both, then link them up with an encryption token, provided in the app. Unfortunately, we found it didn’t work, so after multiple attempts (there is little to no support for the plugin) switched to a different plugin.

Significantly, SiteGround supports adding users – termed “collaborators” – to the hosting and admin screens. This could prove extremely useful for projects with multiple development personnel, or where a client or stakeholder needs some oversight over progress.

(Image credit: Future)WordPress hosting

This is where SiteGround shines. SiteGround have been recommended by WordPress and are a big part of the community. This is where SiteGround seem to focus the training for support.

SiteGround's AutoUpdate system keeps your WordPress installation and plugins up-to-date with the latest security patches and experts and business users might appreciate WP-CLI, a command-line tool which allows automation of many common WordPress management tasks.

SiteGround is a bit more pricey than other options but the features make it worth it if you can make the most of them. You're also paying for two decades of experience providing hosting for WordPress sites and getting hosting from a provider recommended by WordPress themselves.

Cloud hosting 

SiteGround call this cloud hosting but these plans are really VPS plans on cloud infrastructure. SiteGround's cloud technology is far more suited to high-traffic and feature-packed websites where response time is critical, and even 60 seconds of down time is a very big deal: a busy web store, say, or a regularly-updated news site.

As SiteGround uses Google Cloud servers the power used to host sites is 100% matched with renewable energy. So, if you want your business to have green credentials and the power too, SiteGround is a good choice.

If you have that kind of demanding website but SiteGround is a little out of budget you may find a good alternative on our best cloud hosting page.

eCommerce

SiteGround recommend their GoGeek plan for WooCommerce. WooCommerce is based on WordPress and is a very capable system which can handle most web store requirements. If you like SiteGround's hosting, you're already familiar with the ecommerce basics (or are happy to take the time to learn), opting for SiteGround's WooCommerce hosting could make sense. But if you're a novice, or just looking for more help getting started, alternatives like Bluehost's WooCommerce plan, or the online store side of GoDaddy's Website Builder have more tools, more features, and extra ecommerce support when you need it.

SiteGround's GTMetrix (Image credit: SIteGround)Performance

Uptime.com accessed our site every five minutes over 14 days recording any failures and how quickly the server responds. SiteGround had no fails at all, giving it a perfect 100% uptime. Average response time was 0.207 seconds, the fastest in our last 15 tests (most hosts are in the range 0.3 to 0.8 seconds).

GTmetrix measures load speed by grabbing a test page on our site, and measuring how long it takes to display the main content (a figure known technically as Largest Contentful Paint, or LCP). A low LCP means a snappy and responsive website, and (hopefully) plenty of happy visitors.

SiteGround's LCP was fractionally below average at 0.735 seconds, ninth fastest in our last 15 tests. But that's not far behind the top providers (most score in the 0.6 to 0.8 second range), and an acceptable time overall.

SiteGround's response time (Image credit: SIteGround)

K6 goes beyond an individual load time by unleashing 20 simultaneous visitors and watching to see what happens. Our site managed an average of 14 requests per second, with a peak of 20. Again, that's fractionally behind the competition (most average in the 14 to 16 second range), but not enough that you're likely to notice.

(Please keep in mind that these tests are based on the performance of a shared hosting plan, and they can't tell us anything about the speeds we might see from VPS, dedicated or other hosting).

Host

LPC

Uptime

Response time

Requests per second

SiteGround

0.735

100%

0.207

14

Average across all hosts

0.72

99.98%

0.300

14

How easy is SiteGround to use?

Getting started with a web host can be intimidating, but SiteGround does a fair job of helping out. Log into its Control Panel for the first time and you'll find links to support pages covering several common setup tasks: how to import an existing WordPress site, launch WordPress, create email accounts at a new domain, point an existing domain to WordPress, and more.

This isn't quite as useful as it could be. We hoped the 'Access WordPress' link would launch the WordPress dashboard, for instance, but instead it opened a support page explaining how we could do this ourselves. That's still valuable, and better than we see with many hosts, but life would be even easier if the startup page gave us direct links to WordPress and other functions.

Skip past the walkthroughs, though, and SiteGround performs very well. A simple walkthrough makes it very easy to add a new site, for instance. Choose a domain, install a new application (WordPress, WooCommerce or Weebly Sitebuilder) and the site is ready to go in seconds.

It feels like there's real thought gone into the control panel design. Choose 'Create Subdomain' on most panels, they prompt you for the subdomain name, and that's it. SiteGround's control panel understands that you might want to install something there, and offers you an Install Application button to help.

(The installer is relatively basic compared to the likes of Softaculous, with only 13 applications and fewer installation options. But it's also simple, and we had WordPress ready to go within seconds.)

Even then, SiteGround's helpfulness keeps going. Launch WordPress and a wizard prompts you to choose a theme, then offers to install useful free plugins (contact forms, an image gallery, a calendar, Google Maps, WooCommerce, a contact manager, SEO advisor and more).

What is SiteGround's support like?

SiteGround offers 24/7 support via phone, live chat, ticket and its web knowledgebase.

A comprehensive set of tutorials provides lots of useful information on getting started with the service. There's general guidance on setting up your website, managing domains, creating email accounts and more.

The WordPress section begins with similar startup advice - how to install WordPress, create a post, install a plugin - but then adds a little more depth with articles on improving security and optimizing performance. They're a little on the short side, and sometimes too technical for newcomers, but the site still has more and better guidance than many competitors.

You can also contact the support team via phone, live chat and (apparently) ticket, although the website makes this more difficult than usual. There's a Contact Us button, but this walks you through a support wizard which works hard to direct you to a support site article or website tool. It won't even display a chat button, phone number or anything else unless it thinks you're 'deserving.'

This proved to be an unexpected hassle. We decided to ask a test question about our shared plan's automatic backups (could we set the backup time, or was it fixed?), but the wizard just directed us to the 'create a manual backup' button, without ever giving us a contact option to ask further questions.

So, we decided to cheat the system, and just chose alternative wizard options until eventually it offered us live chat or telephone options (no tickets, though). We chose live chat, an agent appeared within seconds, and gave us a clear answer immediately (automatic backup times are set when you sign up and can't be changed).

We tried the phone support later, with similar success. It's an impressive support service, but we'd like it even more if the website didn't try quite so hard to ration our access.

Can I easily migrate to SiteGround?

SiteGround advertises a migration tool, which is intended to make it easy for you to move a WordPress site from another host. It’s a straightforward plugin intended for installation on both sites, and linked with a unique encryption key generated in the destination site.

Unfortunately, our testing found that migrating an existing WordPress site with a small WooCommerce store attached simply failed on every attempt. SiteGround does not offer support for this tool, either, which might leave you feeling adrift if you end up in the same situation. Fortunately, there is an excellent substitute in a similar plugin called Backup Migration, which ironically works along the same lines.

Final verdict

While many hosts try to win you over with low headline prices, SiteGround is far more interested in power. Its shared and cloud hosting plans may look expensive, but they give you plenty of features and functionality for your money, and could be a high performance choice for demanding users with high traffic or business-critical sites.

FAQsWhat payment types does SiteGround support?

SiteGround supports payments via card only.

Does SiteGround offer refunds?

SiteGround offers a 30-day money-back guarantee for its shared hosting plans and servers, dropping to 14 days for cloud hosting.

The policy has the same terms for monthly-billed plans, a welcome plus (GoDaddy only has a 48-hour refund period for subscriptions of less than a year). Renewal fees are mostly covered, too, good news when some providers exclude them entirely (GreenGeeks).

Some providers have longer refund periods - InMotion Hosting offers 90 days, HostGator 45 - but SiteGround's refund policy is more generous than many, and in the area we'd expect for a quality web host.

SiteGround data centers (Image credit: SiteGround)Where are SiteGround's data centers?

SiteGround has data centers in the USA, UK, Australia, Germany, Netherlands, Singapore and Spain.

Sign up for a SiteGround plan and you're able to choose which country will host your site. If your audience is mostly in one country, that's good news; choose a data center near your visitors and they'll see better speeds by default.

If you don't get that quite right, or maybe your audience makeup changes, you can choose a new data center at any time. There's a one-off fee (£20 in the UK) but that's better than some: Hostwinds' best suggestion was we buy a new plan in the new location.

Does SiteGround have an uptime guarantee?

SiteGround has a network uptime guarantee of 99.9%, which means it shouldn't be down for any more than 43.83 minutes a month.

The company offers very generous compensation if the network is down for longer. If you only have 99.9% to 99% uptime, for instance - so maybe just 44 minutes over a month - then SiteGround promises an additional 10% of monthly hosting credits. And you get another month of free hosting for every 1% of uptime lost. 97% uptime, for example, or a total 21.92 of down time over a month, gets you three months free hosting.

There are lots of exceptions. Scheduled and emergency maintenance (when resolved in an hour) isn't covered, for instance. Fallout from hacker attacks isn't covered, either, and the company doesn't count downtime from 'events outside our control', either.

Still, this is a far better guarantee than we usually see. GoDaddy's uptime guarantee is capped at a maximum 5% of your hosting fees, for instance, so even if your site is down for 15 days in a month, you'll only be credited with 1.5 days hosting.

SiteGround IP Address (Image credit: SiteGround)What is my SiteGround IP address?

If you sign up with SiteGround, but use an existing domain which is managed elsewhere, then you'll need to update the domain's DNS records to point at the IP address for SiteGround's server.

To find the information you need, first log into SiteGround's control panel (my.siteground.com).

Click the Websites tab.

Find the domain you need in the Website Details list, and click the More icon to the right (three vertical dots).

Click Server Details.

The control panel displays a pop-up window with your server IP address, its data center location and the SiteGround nameservers.

What are SiteGround's nameservers?

SiteGround's nameservers are NS1.SITEGROUND.NET and NS2.SITEGROUND.NET.

How do I cancel a SiteGround product?

Log into your SiteGround account (my.siteground.com) and click the Services tab.

Find your plan and click the More icon to the right.

Choose Cancel from the menu.

Choose when you'd like to cancel the service (immediately, or when it's due to expire), click Continue, and follow any remaining instructions carefully.

• Want to know how SiteGround compares to another top European web hosting provider, check out Hostinger vs SiteGround

Battlefield REDSEC arrives seven years after the battle royale genre began in earnest, boasting a free-to-play structure, a whole lot of destruction, and of course, a Battle Pass. It launched as a surprise free-to-play update to Battlefield 6, but it can also be downloaded separately.

Review info

Platform reviewed: PS5 Pro
Available on: PC, PS5, Xbox Series X and Series S
Release date: October 28, 2025

I imagine you now have a clear picture in your head as to what Battlefield REDSEC looks like, what mechanics it uses to push players further and further into the map, and can practically see the various icons for currencies both paid for and free.

While Battlefield REDSEC does have a few interesting design choices, I’d almost guarantee that you’ve pretty much played this one before. You'll no doubt recognize key mechanics lifted from several of the best FPS games to come out in recent years, with very little that jumps out as new.

Late for departure

(Image credit: EA)

The highlights then. Battlefield is a perfect fit for battle royale design, and its destructible environments are easily the best I've ever seen in the genre.

The class system borrows from the main game and offers genuinely enticing and decidedly distinct ways to play. There’s tanks too - yes, tanks in a battle royale game. They’re brilliant, but also balanced in a way that makes them extremely difficult to manage, especially if your enemies have brought in an Engineer.

Even the gunplay is tight and enjoyable, and really gives Warzone a run for its money. All in all, I’d recommend Battlefield REDSEC if you’re a fan of shooters, and if you want a more streamlined experience when compared to the bloated monster that main competitor Warzone has become over the years.

The main issue with REDSEC is timing. Had it launched 3 years ago, I reckon it would’ve been a rather exciting proposition.

Instead, it joins Apex Legends, Warzone, Fortnite, and other battle royale games, all jostling for your attention. It’s not just those games either, as 2025 has been a veritable goldmine of innovative multiplayer experiences like Peak, R.E.P.O, and most recently: Arc Raiders. With the arrival of the latter in particular, I’ve found it very difficult to justify sinking hour after hour in Battlefield REDSEC when there’s another game that I’d desperately rather be playing.

Military medley

In my mind, PUBG: Battlegrounds kicked off the ongoing fascination with closing circles and last survivor-victories all the way back in 2018. Battlefield REDSEC then, has quite a bit to borrow from, and borrow it does, rather masterfully in fact. There’s the map design of Warzone, the squad-formation drop-ins from Apex, and the Battle Pass structure perfected by Fortnite. All of this is spliced together into quite a neat package, making Battlefield REDSEC a sort of best-of compilation of games you’ve probably played over the last seven years.

There’s very little fat to trim here, and if you’re looking for a battle royale game that feels the way you remember Warzone feeling in 2020, you’ve found it. Inventories are clean and simple, armor plates aren’t stored in some extra menu or bag that you have to manage on the fly, and matches are all action, all the time.

(Image credit: EA)Burn this city

My favorite quirk of Battlefield REDSEC is the closing circle of flame. Rather than slowly doing damage over time, the flames will instantly kill you if it catches you, and you’ll even take burn damage just by being anywhere near the closing wall.

This does two things: it prevents players from using the closing circle as a hiding spot, while encouraging players to move inwards at all times. That first effect is a very welcome one indeed, and anyone who’s played Warzone over the years can attest to how frustrating it is to get to the final circle and learn that the opposing team is using gas masks and health stims to stay alive in the gas.

Best bit

(Image credit: EA)

Don’t sleep on Gauntlet mode, which pits teams against each other in a variety of different mini-modes set on the battle royale map. For those that don’t want to invest in Battlefield 6, it’s a great sampler of what to expect from the more structured gameplay sessions of the base game. It’s the perfect way to learn the gunplay, as well.

The second effect can be felt dramatically throughout matches, as you and your team frequently have to change position and make quick decisions before the flames get too close. Given the rapidity with which the deadly flaming circle contracts, vehicles become vital means for repositioning.

Gatling gun-mounted buggies feel weighty and fun to drive, while helicopters are hilariously complicated beasts that require careful practice, and a whole lot of bravery to pilot. Add in the tanks and you’ve got a winning formula, as you send vehicles careening through buildings, charging across debris-ridden plains, and soaring across a sky filled to the brim with missiles.

“Iconic DNA”

EA has been hammering on about Battlefield’s “Iconic DNA” in the marketing for REDSEC. Presumably, this refers to the destructability and class-based warfare that I’ve certainly enjoyed while playing the main game’s multiplayer modes. In REDSEC, however, I’m left wanting a bit more of a signature style, something to differentiate it from the countless others vying for my attention.

Part of this identity crisis stems back to the overall design mentality of this new era of Battlefield. After the floundering performance of Battlefield 2042, EA has stripped everything back to the bone, choosing to appease Battlefield 3 and 4 purists rather than risk anything remotely new.

This has been an overcorrection, and while I do enjoy both Battlefield 6 and REDSEC, there’s very little that’s truly memorable about either. This all translates over to REDSEC’s Battle Pass, which is woefully dull, filled with generic military skins and green-brown color swaps of boilerplate character designs.

I’m genuinely left wondering why anybody would spend real money on any of it, and while I understand the need for EA to avoid the wacky and often-maligned cosmetics of Call of Duty, there’s got to be a middle ground.

(Image credit: EA)On a mission

There’s a mission system in Battlefield REDSEC which gives players varied objectives to complete in addition to the main goal of looting and shooting. These range from bomb defusals to tasks that have you aligning satellite beacons. They’re almost always worth doing, and often serve as sneaky ways to bring rival teams closer together. It’s all little more than Contracts in Warzone, or missions in Fortnite, but I do like the implementation better in Battlefield REDSEC.

Similarly, the way loot is labelled and upgraded is sleek and intuitive. Orange crates give you loot that’s specific to your class, while weapon kits can be used to upgrade an aspect of your held weapon.

Custom weapon caches drop from the skies periodically, leading to yet more opportunities for skirmishes between squads. Battlefield REDSEC really excels in pacing, and I’ve found the majority of matches to be action-packed and just bit-sized enough to encourage me to jump back in.

(Image credit: EA)

In terms of incentives, however, REDSEC is once again held back by the trappings of the battle royale genre. There’s really no reward for winning, par for the course at this point, but other games like Fortnite have managed to use victory crowns and exclusive Gliders as a reason for players to want to win again and again. There’s an XP bonus that ties nicely into the shared progression of guns across REDSEC and Battlefield 6, but given the lacklustre nature of the Battle Pass rewards, I find very little reason to keep playing night after night.

By positioning Battlefield REDSREC as a separate, free to play, title, EA has at least made the barrier to entry fairly low. I’d recommend it for those that love battle royale games, as it’s solid enough, and often fun enough, to warrant getting a full squad together to give it a go.

Unfortunately, there’s only Duos and Quads right now, so be aware that you will need to play with randoms often, and there’s really no way to play solo, which is disappointing. For those that’ve gotten their fill from years of Warzone, Fortnite and Apex Legends, however, there’s very little that differentiates REDSEC from titles you’ve already played. Perhaps the genre has started to run its course

Should I play Battlefield REDSEC?

(Image credit: EA)Play it if...

You live and breathe battle royale games
While Battlefield REDSEC doesn’t bring anything new to the genre per se, it is a great culmination of elements borrowed from some of the best that we’ve seen so far. The destructible environments are well worth checking out, at a minimum.

You have a full squad
REDSEC only offers Duos and Quads, and partnering with randoms is a mixed bag at present. The Ping system isn’t perfect, and it can be difficult to coordinate without a mic. Get a full team of pals together to really experience the best of what a Battlefield-branded battle royale has to offer.

You’re enjoying Battlefield 6
There’s shared progression between Battlefield 6 and REDSEC, and the battle royale mode is likely already installed on your hardware. There’s challenges to complete in REDSEC, and the classes line up nicely with those in the main game. You can bring in your custom weapons as well, granted you find a cache that spits them out.

Don't play it if...

You’re looking for something new
I think it’s fair to say that the battle royale genre has lost much of its appeal over the last couple of years. REDSEC is very much by the numbers, and you won’t really find anything in here that you didn’t get in Warzone over five years ago.

You want to progress and unlock new rewards
The battle pass and rewards system is pretty lacking in REDSEC at the moment. If you don’t really want to dig into its various loadout options and grind out attachments, there’s very little to incentivize you to play regularly.View Deal

Accessibility features

Battlefield REDSEC has some decent accessibility settings like Menu Narration, customizable color elements for the HUD, and Tinnitus-related audio sliders. There’s also color profiles for Deuteranopia, Tritanopia, and Protanopia color blindness options. Custom color blind settings can be applied too.

Subtitles can be increased in size, and tweaked to alter outline, background opacity, text opacity, and more. Camera effects like motion blur and HUD motion have sliders, and you can dial down camera shake and turn off camera sprint camera bobbing.

How I reviewed Battlefield REDSEC

I’ve played around 15 hours of Battlefield REDSEC, predominantly in Quads mode. I’ve also spent around an hour of that time in Gauntlet mode. All of this was on PS5 Pro in Auto (Performance) mode, using a DualSense Edge wireless controller with back buttons assigned to jump and interact.

While playing Battlefield REDSEC, I used an LG Ultragear 27GR93U 4K monitor, as well as a Steel Series Arctis Nova 7 Gen 2 headset. For one play session, I also tested the game on PlayStation Portal, and found Gauntlet mode to work well, and it looked great on the handheld screen.

First reviewed November 2025

Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II: one-minute review

Nikon's Z-mount mirrorless cameras system has come of age – seven years since its first Z-mount cameras, we now have its first second-generation lens, the Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II, which is designed to replace the original Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S.

I have a particular personal interest in this new lens, because I've relied on the original for personal and professional work for several years, and I'm still completely happy with it today.

So the question I had going into this review was not whether this lens would be any good – I knew it was going to be a five-star performer. Rather, it's whether it gives users of the original like me enough of a reason to upgrade, and whether it's worth the extra outlay.

I'll cut to the chase and say I don't think it is... depending on the price difference. I've reviewed enough second-generation Sony lenses where I've seen genuine improvement – new lenses that are optically sharper, plus much smaller and lighter. Nikon's new 24-70mm boasts similar improvements, but for me Nikon hasn't quite gone far enough with the upgrades, given the big difference in price at launch and the already excellent quality of the original.

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Still, the Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II is a five-star lens by every metric. Its optical and build quality are top drawer, with edge-to-edge pin sharpness at any focal length, impressive control over lens distortion, and smooth rendering of bokeh.

Build quality impresses, too. Its weather-resistant design betters the original in one key way – zoom is internal, which is one less potential weak spot for dust and water to enter the lens internals.

The original lens is in fact slightly smaller in length, but it extends past the new lens as you zoom up to 70mm. For me, the internal zoom, snappier autofocus, lighter weight and moderately sharper detail are the biggest upgrades, but not enough of a reason to spend so much extra now, rather than waiting for potential price cuts or until the original is phased out.

Price considerations aside, you'll struggle to find a better-quality professional lens, with a versatile 24-70mm zoom and consistent f/2.8 aperture across that range – this is a five-star performer all the way, and key new addition to the Nikon Z lens range.

Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II: price and availability

• Priced at $2,799 / £2,599 / AU$4,599
• Lens hood included
• Announced in August 2025

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Nikon's Nikkor Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II lens was announced in August 2025, costing $2,799 / £2,599 / AU$4,599, lens hood included. At the time of writing the lens has already got its first price cuts in the US and UK where it's now $2,599 / £2,299.

At the time of the mark II's launch, the original 24-70mm lens was already on sale for $2,099 / £1,999, while you can also buy that lens secondhand from trustworthy retailers for much, much less, with prices depending on the condition.

Personally, I'd buy the original secondhand in excellent condition for around 30% less than the mark II new at its current sale price. However, if money is no object for you, then the new lens is of course the better choice of the two.

Nikkor Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II specsNikkor Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II specs

Type:

Standard zoom

Mount:

Z-mount

Sensor:

Full-frame

Focal length:

24-70mm

Max aperture:

f/2.8

Minimum focus:

0.79ft / 0.24 m at 24mm, 1.09ft / 0.33 m at 70mm with a 0.32x max magnification

Filter size:

77mm

Dimensions:

3.4in x 5.6 inches / 84mm x 142mm

Weight:

1.49lbs / 675g

Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II: Design

• Lightest lens of its kind, just 675g
• Weather-resistant design, internal zoom
• Multiple control rings, including a clicked / de-clicked

The 24-70mm f/2.8 is a classic standard zoom and essential offering in a professional mirrorless camera system, historically sitting in the middle of a trio of professional f/2.8 zooms – the other two usually being a 14-24mm f/2.8 and 70-200mm f/2.8.

When I bought my first mirrorless camera, the Nikon Z6 II, I chose the original Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S as my first lens. Such is its quality and versatility that it ended up being the only lens I owned for years, until I splurged on a fast-aperture telephoto prime.

I didn't think the original 24-70mm needed updating – it's such a good lens already. However, the mark II is the first second-generation Z-mount lens, and it does indeed upgrade the original in several ways.

In terms of design, the Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II is the lightest of its kind, just 675g – that's approximately 16% lighter than the 805g original. I used both lenses together and I can't say I noticed the difference particularly, even over a long day of event photography. However, that is a decent drop in weight.

Image 1 of 2

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)Image 2 of 2

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)

The new lens's diameter is slimmer than before, too, with a 77mm filter thread to the original's 82mm. However, the new lens is longer than the original – that is when both lenses are set to the 24mm focal length.

Zoom each lens to 70mm, and that's where the difference kicks in – the new lens has an internal zoom, meaning its dimensions are unchanged as you move through the zoom range (see above), whereas the original lens extends past its successor as you zoom in.

For me, the internal zoom is the single biggest upgrade in the new lens, not only for better balance, but improved ruggedness – it's one less potential point of weakness in terms of dust and dirt ingress. Also, being shorter at 70mm, it's less likely to knock against your surroundings, which is helpful for hectic environments like weddings and events. You can see how the two lenses differ in length below.

Image 1 of 2

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)Image 2 of 2

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)

We lose the basic top LED, which on the original could display key lens settings, including focus distance. In practice, it's not a feature that I particularly missed. Instead, we gain a control ring which can be set to clicked or de-clicked – I suspect most users will set this ring to control aperture. There's three rings in all; zoom, focus and that custom ring.

There's a reassuring quality to the lens, despite its lightweight design – each ring, button and switch handles well. And it balances perfectly with the Nikon Z6 III, which is the camera I was testing the lens with. By extension, it'll be a decent fit with the Z8 and Z9 cameras, too.

A lens hood is supplied with the lens, and it features a hatch. The idea is that when the hatch is open, it's much easier to make on the go adjustments to a filter, say a variable ND for video recording.

On that note, there is a general sense that the mark II version of the lens is better designed for video work. Autofocus is speedier – more on that shortly – focus breathing is suppressed, and there's that de-clicked aperture control ring for smooth adjustments while recording.

Close focusing is also improved – the minimum focus distance depends on the focal length, but the maximum magnification is 0.32x – that's an improvement from the original's 0.22x, and suitable for close up details such as wedding rings, without being a proper macro lens.

Image 1 of 7

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)Image 2 of 7

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)Image 3 of 7

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)Image 4 of 7

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)Image 5 of 7

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)Image 6 of 7

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)Image 7 of 7

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II: Performance

• Incredibly sharp edge to edge
• Smooth bokeh and impressive control of all lens distortions
• Versatile maximum f/2.8 aperture and snappy autofocus

I've taken a wide range of photos in various scenarios with the lens attached to a Nikon Z6 III (with all in-camera lens corrections turned off), using the various aperture settings and focal lengths. Put simply, the Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II is optically flawless, save for a light fall-off at f/2.8 (vignetting, which I rather like).

Detail is pin-sharp from center to edges. For reference, I compared like-for-like images shot with the original, and the new lens has the edge (I'm also working on a versus piece between the two lenses where I will share comparison images, coming soon). You'll need to zoom in to 100% to appreciate the difference, but it is there. I wouldn't feel the need to apply any sharpness corrections when editing the images, whereas with the original I tend to apply a little.

Bokeh quality is similar between both lenses. Sure, you'll want a f/1.4 prime or faster for bigger bokeh, but bokeh rendering at f/2.8 is pleasantly smooth and free of any distortion.

What's all the more impressive is that optical quality is better despite what is a simpler optical design – the new lens has 14 elements in 10 groups, compared to the original's 17 elements in 15 groups (this also partly explains the lighter weight of the new lens).

Image 1 of 7

You'll get lovely crsip sunstars when stopping lens aperture down to, say, f/16 (Image credit: Tim Coleman)Image 2 of 7

At f/2.8, I'm not seeing chromatic aberration distortion (Image credit: Tim Coleman)Image 3 of 7

At f/2.8, there is light fall-off (vignetting) (Image credit: Tim Coleman)Image 4 of 7

In the same scene but at f/8, light fall off is all but gone (Image credit: Tim Coleman)Image 5 of 7

Bokeh is smooth (Image credit: Tim Coleman)Image 6 of 7

Detail is crisp, autofocus reliable (with the Z6 III's subject detection AF) (Image credit: Tim Coleman)Image 7 of 7

Finally, some flare! Not that I'd take a poor quality picture like this for real – I was just trying to eke out flare (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Photos I took in woodland with strong backlighting at f/2.8 are free from chromatic aberration – a distortion I'd expect to see in such a scenario with lesser-quality lenses. In the same scenario with the lens aperture stopped down to f/16, the lens rendered a crisp sunstar (you can see those two photos in the gallery, above).

Only when I pointed the camera straight towards the sun for a backlit selfie could I get any kind of lens flare – that's not a lens drawback, just an impossible situation I presented the lens with, and better lighting required!

Focus breathing is really well controlled, while autofocus performance is superb too. There's no sense of laboring – the lens snappily latches onto subjects, especially when paired with the Z6 III and making use of that camera's subject-detection tracking autofocus skills.

Combine that optical quality, decent close-focusing skills and speedy autofocus, and the Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II is an impressive performer on all fronts.

Image 1 of 7

I could rely on the camera and lens combination for sharp focus even in low light (Image credit: Tim Coleman)Image 2 of 7

Detail is incredibly sharp across this scene (Image credit: Tim Coleman)Image 3 of 7

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)Image 4 of 7

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)Image 5 of 7

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)Image 6 of 7

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)Image 7 of 7

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)Should you buy the Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II?Buy it if...

You want a versatile professional zoom lens

The 24-70mm zoom range and maximum f/2.8 aperture cover off a huge range of scenarios.

You shoot events and weddings

That maximum f/2.8 aperture, fast autofocus skills and robust build are a dream combo for the rigors of event and wedding photography.

Don't buy it if...

You own the original 24-70mm f/2.8

Yes, there are a few improvements, but I don't think this new mark II version merits the financial hit of an upgrade at full price; it'll be a different story when its price drops.

You don't mind a secondhand saving

The original 24-70mm f/2.8 can be purchased secondhand for around 30% less than its successor's list price – that feels like the better deal.

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)How I tested the Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II

• I tested it for one month
• I paired it with the Nikon Z6 III and Nikon ZR cameras
• I used it for photography and video, both indoors and out

Nikon loaned me the Nikkor Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II lens for a month, and during this time I've used it for event, portraiture and landscape photography, and as an everyday lens. I've also shot video with it.

I've made direct comparisons with my own 24-70mm f/2.8 S lens to see to what degree Nikon has improved on the original.

I've made sure to take images using various aperture settings and focal lengths, with all in-camera lens corrections switched off, and compared those images to check for any lens distortions and assess bokeh quality.

• First reviewed November 2025

The PlayStation Portal is the latest in Sony’s PlayStation 5 hardware lineup. Pitched firmly as a PS5 accessory that will enable portable access to your console and game library through an internet connection. It’s a simple prospect and one that utilizes Sony’s PS Remote Play app concept - but deploys it brilliantly in a dedicated device.

Review update: November 2025

(Image credit: Sony/PlayStation)

In November 2025, the PlayStation Portal received a huge update to its functionality and its OS. The biggest update was the change to its cloud streaming prowess, which it now fully offers to all users with a PlayStation Plus Premium subscription.

This enhancement means the Portal is now a bona fide cloud streaming device for Premium members. Those players can also stream their own PS5 games (as long as they're on this list and owned digitally), which is a huge boon. The update also provided a huge OS overhaul and has taken the Portal's performance to another level, ensuring it has rightly earned the five-star score I originally gave it.

The rest of my review on this page is as it was when the Portal released back in November 2023.

To be clear, the PlayStation Portal is exactly that: a small window into your PS5. While not strictly among the best handheld games consoles as it lacks the ability to play games natively like the Nintendo Switch, the PlayStation Portal isn’t trying to be that. It’s offering something entirely different. The terrific news is that it absolutely delivers on what it promises, and is a magnificent device for those who utilize Remote Play or want a portable way into their PS5.

Offering superb ergonomics as well as excellent design and build quality with all those exquisite DualSense controller features on top, this Remote Play beaut and its bright and sharp 8-inch LCD screen present a wonderful portable PS5 experience. One that I’ve already incorporated into my everyday home life.

PlayStation Portal review: price and availability

The PlayStation Portal is out now and costs $199.99 / £199.99. While stock was initially really hard to find after the handheld launched, it is now readily available in all regions. However, discounts are few and far between.

In terms of comparison, the cheapest Steam Deck (the 64GB model) is now $349 / £309, the ASUS ROG Ally starts at $599.99 / £599, and the Nintendo Switch Lite is the closest in price with an MSRP of $199.99 / £200.

However, it’s worth remembering that the Portal is not a system that can play games natively like the above devices. Its sole purpose is to use the Remote Play system (like the Backbone One controller) to stream your PS5, which you need to have invested in already.

As of November 2025, however, you don't need a PS5 to own and use a PlayStation Portal. The handheld can now be used on its own to stream games from the cloud if you have a PlayStation Plus Premium subscription.

PlayStation Portal review: design and features

Essentially a DualSense controller wrapped around an 8-inch LCD display, the PlayStation Portal has an immediately familiar design, build, and feel. It quickly feels at home in the hands of a PS5 owner and is comfortable, easy to handle, and a joy to interact with. It’s also a bit heavier and larger than you might expect. Its weight of 18.66oz / 529g doesn’t sound too heavy, but it is noticeable, especially when picking it up with one hand.

(Image credit: Future/Rob Dwiar)

That largely comes down to the overall size of the device. Coming in at 12in / 30.5cm in length, there’s a notable heft to the Portal that you’ll initially have to get used to. Otherwise, it’s 2.4in / 6cm high to the top of the thumbsticks which are smaller than the DualSense’s sticks and are those found on the PSVR 2 Sense controllers - and about 4.7in / 12cm from front to back.

The controller wings feature everything that a normal DualSense has, with the only slight difference being some button placement - the PS Home button is tucked into the top right corner of the left wing, and the mic mute button gets the same treatment on the top left of the right wing. Otherwise, it’s got the same grippy feel, the buttons are the same in their actuation, and the only material difference is the aforementioned smaller thumbsticks.

On the top, there are two stereo speakers, the power button, volume up and down buttons, and the PlayStation Link button. The latter will only be of use once you can pair your Portal with the Pulse Elite headset, or the upcoming Pulse Explore earbuds. Completing the set, on the rear, there’s the USB-C port for charging and a 3.5mm audio jack for wired headsets; this keeps the cables tidily out of the way when you’re playing. 

The PlayStation Portal feels sturdy too, like it could survive a bump or two if it fell off your lap. However, I have already decided to invest in a screen protector and possibly some form of case to give it an extra layer of protection. From an ergonomics standpoint, it’s one of the best handheld gaming devices going; having been designed and built around a controller, feel, fit, and form can come first, as opposed to other handhelds which have to prioritize a game-playing system first, then bolt on buttons and controls.

PlayStation Portal review - Performance and battery life

(Image credit: Future/Rob Dwiar)

Simply put, the PlayStation Portal performs brilliantly. It nails its function, and in all my hours of testing so far, has been a joy to use and hasn’t had any hiccups in connectivity or any input lag to speak of.

It begins with a very quick pairing and logging-in process before you’re greeted by a bright screen with familiar-looking UI and menus. When you log in (and out) of your PS5 from the Portal, you even get a cool portal graphic which is a pleasant touch.

When you turn on the Portal while your PS5 is in rest mode, it will automatically boot the console up and get you straight in. You can disengage or re-engage the main console while the Portal is on at will too.

Getting right to how it plays games and works as a remote play device, the Portal offers a sublime Remote Play experience. It is so much better than using Remote Play functionality on my PC; the difference is like night and day. Whereas my PC would have visual lag and crackly audio at times, the connection with the Portal is seamless and smooth. Also, when comparing it with the picture on my TV to test input lag, I get barely any, and if it is there it is totally discernable. 

For context, my home internet speeds are around 150Mbps down and around 30-40Mbps up, and while my PS5 is hardwired via ethernet cable, my main Wi-Fi router is in a cupboard under the stairs. But even with my router tucked away, the Portal continues to provide a quality, lag-free experience, never missing a beat regardless of the room I was in. 

I have also connected it to my neighbor's Wi-Fi (with his consent), used my 5G connection (which runs at about 20-25Mbps download speed where I live) from my Samsung S23 phone, and tested it with a variety of games. Aside from taking slightly longer to connect with my PS5 over those separate internet connections, the PlayStation Portal is a relentless performer. Testing it for online play in Back 4 Blood, I found the experience identical to that when playing with my friends on the main console, and it’s even possible - with slight delays in reconnecting to the PS5 - to switch from one internet connection to another mid-session.

(Image credit: Future/Rob Dwiar)

The screen is crisp and bright - a bit too bright at times, particularly when I first booted a game up - and proves more than worthy on the Portal. The worlds of Star Wars Jedi: Survivor and the city lights of Marvel’s Spider-Man 2’s New York are a delight. There are, however, a few times when the LCD screen can show its limitations and have me yearning for an OLED panel; on images like dark save screens, you can identify lines and edges of blocks of color as opposed to a smooth gradient. Largely, though, it's bright, vivid, and perfect for the Portal. It also handles different quality or performance modes in games smoothly.

The Portal’s speakers are punchy and do the job, but, predictably, struggle at the low end given they are only two small stereo speakers squished into the Portal's narrow form. There’s no Bluetooth support on the device, but I wrote a short while ago about how the lack of the feature doesn’t matter, and I would say that’s still the case having lived with the Portal for a good few days now: when you’re plugged in and wearing a headset, playing on the sofa, or in bed, the experience has been the same as using a DualSense for me - I quickly and totally forget that I’m tethered.

The DualSense features operate as expected too, ensuring the Portal offers the same immersive gaming experience as you’d get with your main console. The touchscreen functionality is a success too; it only takes a couple of taps to replicate pressing the normal touchpad, and it's nice and responsive when using it to navigate te the Protal's UI too. Team this with the overall comfort of playing with the Portal for hours at a time, and the quality in its form factor and design is further reinforced.

Battery life is about on par with the DualSense controller. With the controller haptics and features enabled, I got just over six hours of life out of a full charge. I did tinker with screen brightness as that’s quite piercing at its highest level. I got the low battery warning at the four-and-a-half-hour mark, but the Portal kept going for that extra one and a half hours. You can also tone down screen brightness, and turn off features to squeeze more battery life in. The PlayStation Portal does take more than two hours to fully charge, so this is worth factoring into your intended play habits with the device.

I would like a sliding scale of brightness to be introduced down the line, as it’s pretty binary as it stands. I would also welcome a battery indicator that had visible numbers, as at the moment it’s just three chunks in a battery symbol.

Should I buy the PlayStation Portal?

(Image credit: Future/Rob Dwiar)

The PlayStation Portal is a brilliant handheld gaming device. It excels in its niche, offering ergonomic design and form, a wonderfully bright screen, and a host of PS5 features as standard. The Portal is an essential PS5 accessory for Remote Play users and for those looking to get more out of their console, and I cannot recommend it highly enough. 

I would also add, as I was told by Sony about the PlayStation Access controller, that the Portal is part of the PS5 ecosystem so it could benefit from future models down the line. This could pave the way for an OLED screen, the latest Wi-Fi, Bluetooth support, and more in the future.

The Portal is not pretending to be anything else apart from a quality remote-play device for your PS5, and it absolutely nails its brief. As long as you come to it knowing what it does and what it can offer you, then it wholeheartedly, unabashedly, spectacularly succeeds.

Buy it if...

You need a convenient way to play your PS5 game library
Knocking all other Remote Play options out of the park, if you’re looking for an extra way to play your PS5 then the Portal’s performance and functionality offer the best way to do just that.

You want an ergonomic handheld gaming device
By virtue of being based on the DualSense, the PlayStation Portal is one of the most ergonomic and accessible handheld gaming consoles you can get right now.

Don't buy it if...

You're looking for a cloud streaming or native handheld
The Portal is not for cloud streaming or playing games natively; it is only for mirroring and streaming your PS5.

How we tested the PlayStation Portal

The Portal has been the only way I’ve played my PS5 since it arrived a few days ago, and I have put more than 12 hours into testing. I’ve used the Portal for two full battery charges, all around my house, and neighbors’ homes, and testing it on my mobile phone’s 5G connection. I spent hours using the Portal’s own speakers as well as with a wired Razer Kaira X headset, and I played a multitude of games, including Marvel’s Spider-Man 2, Star Wars Jedi Survivor, and Atomic Heart, while also testing out online multiplayer in Back 4 Blood.

First reviewed October-November 2023

The EcoFlow Rapid Pro X is a high-capacity, fast-charging power bank that oozes quality while being user-friendly.

EcoFlow Rapid Pro X - Specification

Battery capacity: 99.5Wh

Number of charge cycles: Over 300 before 20% drop

Number of USB sockets: 3 Type C

Number of power inputs: 2

Fastest charge time: 1 hour

Additional features: Bluetooth and Wi-Fi

Weight: 700g

A large color screen constantly shows the remaining power, and three touch buttons make navigating the menu easy. The Pro X also provides haptic feedback in the form of vibrations when accessing menus.

The station can power only Type-C devices and delivers a combined 270W in a compact footprint, the size of a soda can. The Rapid Pro X supports the newer 140W Power-Distribution profile and fully charges in less than an hour to its 100Wh capacity. EcoFlow offers a desktop charger that adds five additional USB ports and fast charging, making it an ideal companion to the Pro X.

The Pro X alone will cost $299 and is currently discounted for $260. Accessories include the desktop 300W charger, which retails at $150, and a 140W GaN Rapid Pro AC adapter for $80.

(Image credit: Future)EcoFlow Rapid Pro X: Design

The EcoFlow Pro X battery ships in a compact box, with only a charging cable and a user guide. The unit weighs 700g and measures 5.7cm x 8.4cm x 15.2cm, making it convenient to throw in a backpack. The plastic case with its rounded edges fits easily in the palm. Electrical connections are on the top and bottom, and the plastic shell can be replaced if the case is scratched or broken.

The front panel sports a large 5” color display with the menu accessible using three touch buttons on the right side. Two buttons control the up and down menu, while a third validates the selection. The unit vibrates when touched, and the backlight turns off after 60 minutes of inactivity.

The Pro X hosts three Type-C connectors on the top. The leftmost blue-keyed connector, known as C1, supports up to 140W of power for downstream devices. The remaining two connectors, C2 and C3, can each output 65W, and along with C1, make the Pro X a 270W unit.

The built-in 100Wh Lithium Polymer battery charges via either the high-powered C1 connector or the docking connector at the bottom. Type-C charging is convenient for on-the-go use and requires only a standard power adapter.

With an input power of up to 140W, the charging time is about 40 minutes. The faster method is through the docking station, which can transfer at up to 240W, resulting in a complete charge in under 30 minutes.

(Image credit: Future)EcoFlow Rapid Pro X: In Use

The EcoFlow Pro X setup is straightforward thanks to a well-designed user interface. We recommend first charging the Pro X, then connecting it to the mobile app, available on both Apple and Android platforms.

A firmware update may be available and pushed to the device. The local clock auto-adjusts once connected to the app. The unit features a timer that can be set to time out in five-minute increments.

The rate at which the Pro X charges through its base station is not constant. The unit will first charge at full power, providing 240W through the bottom pins, but will gradually decrease to settle on 60W at around 40% battery charge. On the other hand, charging through the 140W GaN EcoFlow adapter provides a constant flow and is generally quicker.

The mobile app displays the current charging rate for the internal battery and the output power rate for each connected device. Since all outputs are always enabled, the Pro X will self-discharge over a couple of days, even when no device is connected.

This is likely due to having an active Wi-Fi connection. The unit will also dissipate heat on its own. We recommend turning it off through the menu when unused for an extended period.

In addition to not fully utilizing the 320W capacity when paired with the Rapid Pro desktop charger, the Pro X’s battery provides only 300 charge cycles before experiencing a 20% capacity drop.

(Image credit: Future)EcoFlow Rapid Pro X: Competition

The EcoFlow Pro X's main competitor is the Anker Prime power bank, which has a similar form factor and power capacity.

The Pro X has a slightly higher output power capacity, at 300W, compared to the Prime's 250W. The three Type-C sockets are also more helpful than the two Type-C and one Type-A available in the Prime.

(Image credit: Future)EcoFlow Rapid Pro X: Final Verdict

The EcoFlow Pro X is an excellent portable power source to quickly charge multiple Type-C devices. Its main selling points are a refined UI, a bright display, and WiFi connectivity.

The unit seamlessly integrates into the EcoFlow ecosystem, with the mobile app functioning smoothly. Thanks to the new 140W Type-C power profile, it will charge devices faster than a conventional adapter.

Its main drawbacks are an ability to self-discharge when left unconnected and a quick charge that settles to a lower input power over time.

We liked the ease of replacing part of the enclosure and the hassle-free docking when paired with the Rapid Pro desktop charger.

Get the Rapid Pro X if ... you already have other EcoFlow devices and need portable power.

Don’t get the Pro X if ... you are on a budget.

We've featured the best portable power stations.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.: one-minute review

We’re big fans of Thrustmaster’s eSwap products at TechRadar Gaming but the Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E. isn’t exactly the big leap forward the brand’s controller lineup needs. As for changes, the clue’s in the name. The H.E. packs in a pair of Thrustmaster’s H.E.A.R.T. Hall effect thumbsticks, which is nice, and means you won’t need to buy them separately. It's one of the best Xbox controllers, but slightly better.

If you’re buying an eSwap controller for the first time, then the H.E. is definitely the one to get. By default, it is the best eSwap gamepad to date by packing those Hall effect sticks in with the already excellent eSwap X2. And yes, you can still expect brilliant build quality and Thrustmaster’s commitment to accessibility and customizability through its swappable stick and D-pad modules.

But don’t expect any changes beyond that, which also means issues that we had with the Thrustmaster eSwap X2 are still present here. It’s a bulky controller that, while ideal for big-handed players, can be a bit unwieldy for anyone else. I also found the D-pad to be a little uncomfortable over long play sessions.

Finally, I’m still baffled by the lack of a wireless connectivity option, given the relatively high price of the controller. This is a competitive-facing controller, and naturally wired connections offer little to no input latency. However, as we see in rival controllers like the Razer Wolverine V3 Pro, wireless polling rates are improving, further reducing input lag over 2.4GHz wireless connections on PC. It’s something I’d like to see Thrustmaster at least consider if and when it gets around to making the eSwap X3.

(Image credit: Future)Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.: price and availability

• List price: $169.99 / £139.99 (around AU$260)
• Cheaper than the eSwap X2 in the UK
• Price remains identical to the eSwap X2 in the US

The Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E. launched on October 1, 2025, and is available to buy from Thrustmaster’s website and other stocking retailers for $169.99 / £139.99 (around AU$260). In terms of price, it’s on par with the original Thrustmaster eSwap X2 in the US. In the UK, the eSwap X2 H.E. is £10 cheaper than the first eSwap X2, coming in at £149.99 as opposed to the prior model’s £169.99. Bonus.

Looking at the wider controller market, when it comes to pads compatible with Xbox Series X, Xbox Series S, and PC, the Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E. finds itself among a busy crowd. While cheaper than the excellent Razer Wolverine V3 Pro ($199.99 / £199.99), it finds company with the Xbox Elite Wireless Controller Series 2 ($179.99 / £159.99).

And frankly, I’d recommend the eSwap X2 H.E. over that official Xbox pad in a heartbeat, due to the former’s Hall effect sticks and generally superior build quality.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E. review: Specs

Price

$169.99 / £139.99 (around AU$260)

Weight

10.6oz / 0.3kg

Dimensions

6.3 x 4.7 x 2.4in / 160 x 120 x 60mm

Compatibility

Xbox Series X, Xbox Series S, Xbox One, PC

Connection type

Wired (USB-C)

Battery life

N/A

(Image credit: Future)Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E. review: design and features

The Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E. remains largely identical to the original eSwap X2 in design. It’s the exact same shape and has all the same features. That includes swappable thumbstick and D-pad modules, trigger locks, and four remappable buttons on the rear of the pad.

You also have a row of on-board function buttons at the bottom of the controller, and these are for headset volume and mic muting, as well as swapping between custom button profiles. You can hit a ‘map’ button to customize the rear remappable buttons, too, if you don’t like the fact that they’re assigned to the four face buttons by default.

The controller does feel quite bulky in the hands, and the thumbsticks rest higher than what you’ll find on the average pad. As such, it really benefits players with larger hands, or those looking for an especially sturdy grip. It’s not quite to my personal preference, but I absolutely can see it being many players’ go-to pad for specifically this reason.

Much like the Victrix Pro BFG Reloaded, the Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E. supports swappable stick and d-pad modules. These are magnetic, and pop out either by pulling them (don’t worry, you’re not at risk of breaking these as they’re especially sturdy and there’s no physical connection), or the included screwdriver which slots into the D-pad. This makes it easy to adopt a symmetrical stick layout if you prefer, or to swap out with other Thrustmaster modules that are sold separately.

As was the case with the eSwap X2, you can expect build quality to be solid here. After all, it is for all intents and purposes also an eSwap X2, just with the addition of those Hall effect sticks included in the box. So no movement or changes on that front.

(Image credit: Future)Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E. review: Performance

The inclusion of Thrustmaster H.E.A.R.T. thumbsticks really is the selling point here. These resist stick drift and are a massive improvement over the eSwap X2’s default sticks. They feel super smooth, too, reminding me greatly of the Nintendo Switch 2 Pro Controller’s sublime stick feel.

Like the original X2, the face buttons here are impressively responsive and tactile, offering a mouse click-esque press. You’ll feel the difference immediately if you’re used to the softer, spongier button presses of cheaper pads like the Xbox Wireless Controller. The immediacy of presses here are super satisfying, and that also goes for the clicky bumpers and D-pad.

Speaking of, the D-pad here actually isn’t among my favorites. While I appreciate its responsiveness, the raised, bumpy design is something I found to be quite uncomfortable to use over longer stretches of time. It’s far from horrible, but for platformers, arcade-style games, and the best fighting games, it’s not a great fit.

One other thing to note is that the H.E. is still a strictly wired controller. To an extent, this is to be expected, as what we have here is essentially a slight revision of the eSwap X2. The ‘definitive’ version, quite possibly. I’d definitely like to see Thrustmaster offer a wireless solution for its next big gamepad release, though, as I strongly feel the option should be there when your controller is north of the $120 / £120 mark.

(Image credit: Future)Should I buy the Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.?Buy it if...

You’re new to the eSwap line
If you’re looking to buy an eSwap controller for the first time, then the H.E. really is the only choice you need to make. Depending on where you live, it’s the same price or slightly cheaper than the standard eSwap X2, and offers Hall effect sticks in the box.

You want a chunky, sizable controller
There aren’t many controllers that seem designed primarily for larger hands. This may not have been the intended design goal with the eSwap X2 H.E., but its chunky build and high quality make it extra comfortable if your hands are on the larger size.

Don't buy it if...

You own an eSwap X2
Quite simply, if you already have a Thrustmaster eSwap X2 controller, there’s no reason to buy this latest revision. Instead, you should consider picking up the H.E.A.R.T. modules from Thrustmaster’s website.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E. review: Also consider

Not too keen on the Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.? Here are a couple more controllers worth considering if you’re planning to upgrade from the stock Xbox Wireless Controller, or otherwise.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.

Victrix Pro BFG Reloaded

Nacon Revolution X Unlimited

Price

$169.99 / £139.99 (around AU$260)

$209.99 / £179.99 (around AU$322)

$199.99 / £179.99 (around AU$300)

Weight

10.6oz / 300g

9.3oz / 265g

11.53oz / 327g

Dimensions

6.3 x 4.1 x 2.4in / 160 x 105 x 60mm

6.3 x 4.2 x 2.6in / 160 x 106 x 66mm

7.5 x 7.4 x 3.5in / 190 x 189 x 89mm

Compatibility

Xbox Series X, Xbox Series S, Xbox One, PC

Xbox Series X, Xbox Series S, Xbox One, PC (PlayStation version sold separately)

Xbox Series X, Xbox Series S, Xbox One, PC

Connection type

Wired (USB-C)

Wireless (2.4GHz), Wired (USB-C)

Wireless (2.4Ghz, Bluetooth), Wired (USB-C)

Battery life

N/A

Around 20 hours

Around 10 hours

Victrix Pro BFG Reloaded
The Victrix Pro BFG Reloaded is more expensive, but offers wireless connectivity and a similar module-swapping tech to the eSwap X2 H.E. You’re even getting a ‘fightpad’ module in the box that works excellently with fighting games or your favorite arcade classics.

Read our full Victrix Pro BFG Reloaded review

Nacon Revolution X Unlimited
Certainly a strange one at first glance with its built-in LCD display. But this ends up being the Revolution X Unlimited’s best feature, offering plenty of convenient options and features right on the deck without needing to open any external software. A real winner and one of my favorites.

Read our full Nacon Revolution X Unlimited review

How I tested the Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.

• Tested for a week
• Played a variety of games across Xbox and PC
• Compared to the previous eSwap X2, and the Victrix BFG Pro Reloaded among others

I tested the eSwap X2 H.E. for about a week for this review. I was already familiar with the original eSwap X2 via its excellent Elden Ring: Shadow of the Erdtree special edition, and I found the H.E. to be completely identical in design and performance, with the addition of those included Hall effect sticks.

I played games across Xbox Series X Digital Edition and PC, including Final Fantasy 14 Online, Tekken 8, Ninja Gaiden 4, The Outer Worlds 2, and Virtua Fighter 5 R.E.V.O. World Stage.

I compared my time with the eSwap X2 H.E. primarily with that of the Victrix Pro BFG Reloaded. Victrix’s pad is the most similar to Thrustmaster’s with its swappable modules. While I do prefer the Pro BFG Reloaded overall, that mainly comes down to personal preference given its aptitude for fighting games and a comfier build for my smaller hands. Still, the eSwap X2 H.E. is more affordable, which is a strong reason to consider it here.

First reviewed October/November 2025

Read more about how we test

Kodak PixPro C1: Two-minute review

Compact cameras are suddenly trending, including simple pocket-sized point and shoot cameras, and Kodak is riding the wave with the PixPro C1. It’s pretty, it’s cheap and it looks like the perfect antidote to complex mirrorless cameras or expensive smartphones. But can a camera this cheap be any good?

Sadly, it doesn’t take long to answer that question. The PixPro C1 is pretty plasticky, as you would expect at this price, but it looks the part and it has a flip-up selfie screen and a basic but effective set of controls that makes it easy to use. It’s what’s inside that’s the problem.

The C1 uses a very small 13MP 1/1.3-inch sensor of unknown vintage that exhibits all the characteristics of old point and shoot cameras that we’ve conveniently forgotten, with image quality that’s OK in good light but rapidly disintegrates if you need to use a higher ISO in low light or if you use the digital zoom.

The PixPro C1 looks smart, but inside is a tiny 13MP sensor and a digital, not optical zoom. (Image credit: Rod Lawton)

Yes, it’s a digital zoom not an optical one. The tiny sensor’s image quality is already stretched to the limit in perfect conditions, so the digital zoom just magnifies its limitations. At the maximum 4x zoom setting you get photos that might look OK on a phone screen, but not so much on a tablet and definitely not in a print. You really are better off sticking to the native focal length, and at 26mm equivalent, this is pretty wide, much like the main camera on a phone.

This camera’s other major issue is its slow response. The single (center) point autofocus can take half a second or a second to lock on, and when you press the shutter release there’s a further delay of a second while the screen goes black… and then you get the shutter sound. It’s very difficult to time your exposures with moving subjects, and the Kodak’s slim, slippery shape makes it difficult to keep it steady – there’s no image stabilization.

So from the outside the Kodak PixPro C1 is quite smart, but inside it uses tech that could have come straight from an old phone or a very cheap point and shoot compact from ten years ago. It’s very disappointing.

Kodak PixPro C1: price

• Priced at $99 / £79 / AU$154
• USB cable and wrist strap included
• Available now

The Kodak PixPro C1 sells for around $99 / £79 (about AU$154). That doesn’t sound much for a fully-functioning pocket-sized digital camera, but it’s quite a lot to spend on something that you end up not using because your smartphone is so much better. That price doesn’t include a memory card, though our sample included a microSD card and card reader, so bundles may vary.

Kodak PixPro C1: specsKodak PixPro C1 specs

Type:

Pocket sized compact camera

Sensor:

13MP 1/1.3-in CMOS

Lens:

3.57mm (26mm equivalent) f/2, up to 4x digital zoom

Focus range:

0.6m-infinity, 0.08m macro

ISO:

100-1600

Video

1920x1080 up to 60fps

Storage:

microSD, up to 32GB

EVF:

No

Stabilization:

No

Flash/light:

Built in

Screen:

180-degree tilting, 2.8-in, 230k-dot

Battery:

Built in, non-removable, 200 shots approx.

Size:

103 x 60 x 20.3mm, 115g

Kodak PixPro C1: design

• Slim, light, smart styling
• Plasticky feel but solid enough at the price
• Memory card slot exposed in the base – no door
• Phone-style LED ‘flash’

The Kodak's rear screen flips upwards to face the front, so it's ideal for selfies. (Image credit: Rod Lawton)

The menu system has only a few basic options, but that's ideal for a beginner audience. (Image credit: Rod Lawton)

The battery is good for around 200 shots. It's non-removable, so you charge it via the USB-C port on the side. (Image credit: Rod Lawton)

The PixPro C1 takes micro SD cards up to 32GB. Unusually, they just slot into the base, with no door or cover. (Image credit: Rod Lawton)

We forget how small point and shoot cameras used to be! The Kodak PixPro C1 will easily slip into a shirt pocket or a trouser pocket, and because it weighs just 115g, you’ll hardly know it’s there. It’s available in a black or tan or brown finish – mine came in brown, and it does look pretty classy.

It does feel plasticky when you pick it up, however, especially round the back where the screen and the controls are. The top edge of the screen has a hinge so that you can flip it up to face forward for selfies, and to the right you’ve got a four-way controller, menu, playback, mode and record buttons, plus a rocker for the zoom.

You can shoot in full auto mode, switch to program mode for a little more control, or use a small selection of ‘scene’ modes. The menu button displays options for picture styles, metering pattern, resolution (just in case you want less than 13 megapixels!), white balance and continuous versus single shot mode. The menus are basic but clear.

There is a built in flash – well, sort of, as it’s actually a phone-style LED, but that’s fine. Underneath, in the base of the camera, you’ll find the memory card slot, which takes microSD cards. There’s no door or cover of any sort – the card just pushes into the slot, where it’s flush with the base so you can still stand the camera on a flat surface.

It’s all very basic but effective, and exactly what you would expect from a cheap camera. It’s not too daunting for beginners, either.

Kodak PixPro C1: performance

• Sluggish shutter action
• Poor image quality at higher ISOs
• Digital zoom not worth using
• Autofocus struggles/fails in low light

The Kodak PixPro C1 delivers decent enough image quality in good light, but not really on a par with a modern smartphone. (Image credit: Rod Lawton)

The metering system did a good job with the tricky lighting in this shot. The brightest parts of the sky might be a little blown out, but you can see all the detail in the foreground. (Image credit: Rod Lawton)

The sensor can go up to ISO 1600, but by this point any fine detail in the image has been swallowed up by heavy noise reduction. (Image credit: Rod Lawton)

Physically, the PixPro C1 is pretty decent at this price. It’s the performance that’s disappointing. You could argue that you shouldn’t expect much for this money, but there comes a point where a product just isn’t good enough to use, regardless of how cheap it is, and the PixPro C1 sails pretty close to the wind here.

Before you even get to look at its images, its operation feels very vague and sluggish. The AF is not particularly quick, but the worst part is the shutter action, which takes about a second to complete and only makes a shutter sound at the end. This is not a camera for fast action or grabbed shots. Not only that, the rear screen gets quite hard to see in bright light.

It's best to use the PixPro at its native 26mm equivalent zoom setting, which is pretty wide and a bit like the main camera on a smartphone. (Image credit: Rod Lawton)

With smaller subjects like this, you can switch to the macro mode to get a whole lot closer. (Image credit: Rod Lawton)

As for the pictures… well, it depends on what you are expecting. The resolution, dynamic range and noise are just what you would expect from a small sensor of the old days, and not a patch on what a modern smartphone camera array would produce. In good outdoor light where you don’t need a higher ISO and there’s little risk of camera shake, the images are OK. But in poor light at higher ISOs the detail smudges and object edges become hyper-processed and things aren’t good at all.

Just so that you can get an idea of what the digital zoom does, here is a shot taken without the zoom. Sorry about the weather, by the way. I live in the seaside tow Weston-super-Mare in the UK. This is what it looks like between October and March... (Image credit: Rod Lawton)

Here is the same subject captured with the 4x digital zoom. Click the gadget, bottom left of the photo, to see the full size version if you dare. (Image credit: Rod Lawton)

If you do use the zoom, you quickly realize that the 13MP sensor really can’t stand a lot of cropping. Or any cropping, to be honest.

I did try the ‘flash’ indoors. There’s nothing wrong with the illumination it provides, but it only comes on when the camera has focused, and in my tests the autofocus struggled if it was too dark, and without sharp focus the flash wasn’t much help.

The inbuilt lamp does a good job of illuminating indoor scenes. Unfortunately, it was too dark for the AF system to focus, so the shot isn't sharp. (Image credit: Rod Lawton)Should you buy the Kodak PixPro C1?

(Image credit: Rod Lawton)Buy it if...

You just need a cheap camera

The PixPro C1 makes a certain amount of sense as a basic camera you don’t need to worry about for school trips, as a gift, or as a ‘just in case’ camera to keep in your vehicle’s glovebox or your coat pocket

You want a lightweight pocket camera

The Kodak is lighter than a smartphone, probably won’t fall out of your pocket as easily and has a simple clarity of purpose that a lot of people like in their gadgets

You want to relive those retro point-and-shoot years

This is a big thing at the moment, as modern photographers yearn for the simplicity of the old days and the flawed but characterful look of old digital cameras. If character is the word

Don't buy it if...

You’re expecting modern digital quality

The PixPro C1 uses very old, very basic sensor technology that would have earned it a bit of a roasting even ten years ago

You want a cheap and effective ‘street snapper’

The Kodak’s responses are way too slow for any kind of ‘snap reaction’ photography. It’s actually quite difficult to time your shots, and you have to hope your subjects will wait

You need the versatility of a zoom

I’ve seen the PixPro C1 advertised (mistakenly) in some places as having a 4x ‘optical’ zoom. It doesn’t. It’s digital, and the sensor really doesn’t have the resolution or quality to make the digital zoom feature useful.

Also consider

Akaso Brave Lite

Yes, the Akaso Brave Lite is an action, camera, but hear me out. It’s small, it’s rugged, it takes 20MP stills and shoots 4K video. An action camera is like a point and shoot but with added versatility. The Brave Lite doesn’t even cost a whole lot more than the PixPro C1.

Read our Akaso Brave Lite review

CampSnap camera

Think the Kodak PixPro C1 is cheap? How about the cheaper-still CampSnap camera? It's essentially a digital reimagining of the single-use disposable film cameras, with a memory card already inside that can hold up to 2,000 pictures.

Read our CampSnap camera review

Fujifilm X Half

The Fujifilm X Half is perfect if you’re serious about re-living those retro shooting vibes and you don’t want to take a big drop in image quality and responsiveness. Yes, it costs a LOT more than the PixPro C1, but it will take far better pictures and probably give you a lot more pleasure.

Read our Fujifilm X Half review

How I tested the Kodak PixPro C1

(Image credit: Rod Lawton)

• I tested it over a period of two weeks
• I tried it with a variety of subjects and lighting conditions
• I also assessed its responsiveness and ease of use

I’ve had the Kodak PixPro C1 for a couple of weeks, which has given me the chance to try it out in all kinds of situations where a camera like this might be used, including outdoor shots, close-ups, indoor scenes and pet pictures. I wanted to give it every chance to show what it could do and how it would react to typical point and shoot situations.

Obviously I wasn’t expecting top image quality, just pictures that were good enough for the purpose. I did feel the Kodak needed to prove it was better than a smartphone or at least as good. Most poeple already have a smartphone with a decent camera, so the Kodak did need to bring something else to the table.

It’s not just the image quality that’s important, but overall handling, usability and responsiveness, and that’s how I approached the PixPro C1.

• First reviewed November 2025

It’s almost hard to believe that the original release of Virtua Fighter 5 is 20 years old. Sega’s 3D fighter has had almost as much staying power as Street Fighter 2, with a dedicated fan base that’s continued to keep the torch lit for two decades now.

Review info

Platform reviewed: PS5, PC
Available on: PS5, Xbox Series X, Xbox Series S, PC (Nintendo Switch 2 coming soon)
Release date: October 30, 2025

It’s a title that has received not one, but two revisions in 2025 alone, as part of a series revival that will culminate in a brand new entry expected to arrive sometime over the next couple of years. Virtua Fighter 5 R.E.V.O. World Stage is the latest rendition, bringing the Steam release of R.E.V.O. earlier this year to modern platforms, including PS5, Xbox Series X, Xbox Series S, and soon on Nintendo Switch 2.

While mostly a straight port of said PC version (which has also received a free update adding in the new content), World Stage does bring new elements worth checking out. The titular World Stage mode is a substantial piece of single-player content, and it’s joined by a new playable character (who is unfortunately paid downloadable content), full crossplay between consoles and PC, and the reintroduction of customization items from earlier versions of Virtua Fighter 5.

(Image credit: Sega)

It’s an impressive package for the low price of $19.99 / £15.99 / AU$27.95, and an easy sell for folks looking for a new 3D fighter to get into; perhaps even those who’re burned out on Tekken 8’s controversial Season 2 changes.

Virtua Fighter 5 R.E.V.O. World Stage isn’t brimming with content necessarily, but I have been enjoying World Stage mode in short bursts. And ultimately, in terms of play, VF5 simply remains one of the best fighting games out there, with bogglingly complex and technical gameplay that stretches far beyond what its three-button system might initially imply.

Virtua insanity

(Image credit: Sega)

So first, a quick introduction for those who might be largely unfamiliar with Virtua Fighter 5. It - along with the series in general - is a 3D fighter with just three main buttons: punch, kick, and guard. It sounds simple, but the game’s overt complexity comes from its characters’ incredibly diverse move sets, and what it does with various combinations of those buttons.

Each of the game’s 20 playable characters are masters of a specific martial art and largely plays wholly differently from one another. Jeffry, for example, hits like a truck with his Pankration style, while Pai’s Ensei-Ken is faster and more elegant.

Then you have more specialist characters. Vanessa is essentially two characters in one, able to switch between stances for two completely different move sets. Aoi’s Aiki Ju-Jutsu is more of a defensive style, prioritizing parries and reversals for big damage cashouts. And if you’re looking for something flashier, Wolf and El Blaze fill out the pro wrestling and Lucha Libre styles, respectively. Then there’s Taka Arashi, a sumo wrestler whose large size makes him entirely unique in both offense and defense.

Virtua Fighter 5 is much more grounded than other 3D fighters like Tekken or Dead or Alive, with relatively few fantastical aspects. A decidedly more ‘realistic’ fighting game experience, matches can be over in a matter of seconds thanks to small health bars, quick round times, and blisteringly fast-paced gameplay. Button mashing and input mistakes are heavily punished, as is forgetting to guard, given that’s an action assigned to its own button here.

Around the world (stage)

(Image credit: Sega)

Let’s talk about the new, then. Virtua Fighter 5 R.E.V.O. World Stage’s biggest addition is the titular World Stage mode. This is an entirely single-player piece of content that aims to emulate Virtua Fighter 4’s excellent Quest mode. In World Stage, you travel to various venues from a menu where you’re pitted against random AI opponents. Each new venue scales upwards in difficulty, with some opponents even being based on real-world players’ signature playstyles.

Best bit

(Image credit: Sega)

Virtua Fighter 5 is a three-button fighting game that does a lot with a little. The complexity can be utterly mind-boggling for newcomers, but within lies one of the most satisfying learning experiences you can have with any fighter on the market.

It starts off simple enough for beginners to enjoy, and keeps the training wheels on while encouraging them to try out a bunch of characters. You’re even incentivized to do so, as there are hundreds of challenges that each unlock a piece of clothing or an accessory for you to customize characters with. It’s a snappy, fast-paced mode that queues up fights one after another in rapid succession, and it’s really enjoyable in short bursts.

Virtua Fighter 5 R.E.V.O. World Stage also adds ‘Costume E’ - a fifth outfit for each playable character, and the bulk of World Stage mode’s unlocks are related to these outfits. Sadly, customization still feels lacking overall, with most options being simple recolors, and there aren’t all that many different styles per character. You can’t mix and match pieces of clothing between characters (you can only do so with certain accessories) either, and there are no custom color options for clothing or hairstyles.

That’s a real shame, especially because older versions of VF5 had even more customization options that are still absent in World Stage. It’s a step in the right direction with the addition of Costume E, for sure, but I’d like to see future patches potentially adding more. Of course, it’s not the end of the world; VF5 remains an unbelievably fun and rewarding fighting game to just play, and nowhere is that more apparent than in its online suite.

Hop on VF

(Image credit: Sega)

Online play in Virtua Fighter 5 R.E.V.O. World Stage is stronger than it’s ever been, thanks to its release on modern platforms with full crossplay support. That means PlayStation and Xbox players (and soon to be Switch 2) can play against each other as well as with those on Steam.

Rollback netcode is also great here, allowing for smoother connections between players online. Though I’d still recommend investing in an Ethernet cable if you haven’t already, Wi-Fi and fighting games just don’t mix well, no matter how good the netcode here is, due to the inherent instability of wireless connections, and especially when fighting players who live overseas.

The suite of online options is pretty standard, but not really missing anything major except for unranked quickplay. You have ranked matches, as well as room matches, for when you want to set up a lobby with multiple players. There are also tournaments that happen periodically that you can sign up for.

I’ve been playing on PC on and off since the release of Virtua Fighter 5 R.E.V.O. back in January. Now that I’ve tested the game on PS5 via the World Stage revision, I’m happy to say that online connectivity holds up just as well on that console as it does on PC.

The only real issue I’ve run into is occasionally slow matchmaking times. The playerbase here isn’t as lively as it is for, say, Street Fighter 6 or Tekken 8, so it’s not uncommon to be waiting upwards of a minute to get into a match. But now that the game is available across all platforms, I hope this issue diminishes as more people discover the game.

Should you play Virtua Fighter 5 R.E.V.O. World Stage?

(Image credit: Sega)Play it if...

You’re burned out on Tekken 8
As 3D fighters go, VF5 is refreshing in its grounded design. It could not be further from Tekken’s fantastical elements or its agonizingly long combo strings. Overall, it’s a brilliant palette cleanser and significantly less stressful right now than the state Bandai Namco’s fighter finds itself in.

You want to be a part of a close-knit fighting game community
I can say with confidence that the Virtua Fighter community is an incredibly nice and welcoming one. The official Discord server is full of folks willing to help out beginners, offer tips, and generally make the intimidating task of learning VF5 that much more manageable.

You like single-player content in fighting games
World Stage does have a standard arcade mode, but the addition of the titular World Stage mode adds tens of hours of play time for casual players who like ticking off challenges and collecting customization goodies in an offline environment.

Don't play it if...

You were hoping for the next big 3D fighter
As I’ve already said, World Stage is not a blockbuster, full-priced premium release. While a brand new Virtua Fighter is in development at Ryu Ga Gotoku Studios, World Stage is more of an affordable appetizer to tide folks over until the next big game.

Accessibility

There aren’t any dedicated accessibility settings in Virtua Fighter 5 R.E.V.O. World Stage; nothing in the way of things like colorblind modes or visual or audio cues like we see in other modern fighting games like Tekken 8 and Street Fighter 6.

How I reviewed Virtua Fighter 5 R.E.V.O. World Stage

I’ve played Virtua Fighter 5 R.E.V.O. World Stage for a combined 25 hours across PC and PS5. Some of that playtime also came from R.E.V.O.’s initial release back in January. For World Stage specifically, I played a whole bunch of the new World Stage mode and tried out the new crossplay features, which open the game up to console players.

My controllers of choice were primarily the Razer Raiju V3 Pro on PlayStation 5, as well as the 8BitDo Ultimate 2 and Corsair Novablade Pro on PC.

First reviewed November 2025

Dyson Hot+Cool HF1: two-minute review

The Dyson Hot+Cool HF1 is a sleek and smart fan heater with the bladeless and aesthetically pleasing design we expect to see from the brand.

Availability in other regions

At the time of publishing, the Dyson Hot+Cool HF1 has only been released in the UK, and we’ve had no response regarding when it will be released elsewhere as yet.

In the meantime, I recommend taking a look at the previous model, the Dyson Hot+Cool Fan Heater AM09, or the purifying Dyson Purifier Hot+Cool Gen1 HP10.

With a premium list price of £399.99, the Dyson Hot+Cool HF1 can be found at Dyson and a few other retailers. Sadly, it’s only available in the UK at the time of publishing, but I’ll provide an update if it ever makes its way off the island.

The HF1 offers ten fan speeds, three oscillation options of up to 70 degrees, a heater that can kick out up to 90ºF / 32ºC, and, most excitingly, some desirable smart features.

During testing, I found the HF1 to be very efficient in both Cool and Hot modes. The lowest setting delivered a delicately cooling breeze to me as I sat on my couch six feet away.

There are plenty of ways to control the HF1, with a few onboard controls, a remote, and the MyDyson app, which gave me access to the whole suite of settings and features.

I could perform most actions with the remote, but its communication with the HF1 was a bit patchy at times. The MyDyson app made controlling the HF1 delightfully easy and offered me a wider range of timer options, as well as scheduling, historical ambient temperature data, and, pleasingly, the option to turn on heat mode remotely so I could return to a warm living room.

(Image credit: Future)

The fan’s volume was perfectly acceptable and on par with most of the similar fans I’ve tested. Sleeping with the HF1 a few feet from the bed was a smooth ride, for the most part. However, when it came to using Hot mode, I found that it would go through a period of being particularly noisy for a few moments as it got up to temperature, which it would do whenever the ambient temperature dropped below the target I’d set.

This wasn’t so bad in the daytime, but as one of its selling points is that you can use it in your bedroom overnight to keep the temperature at a desirable level, it’s worth bearing in mind if you’re a light sleeper.

(Image credit: Future)

If you have children or inquisitive pets, it’s also worth noting that the metallic edging at the front of the air purifier can get very hot very quickly, and that the child lock only applies to the onboard controls. So if you have a rampaging toddler or a clumsy cat, this could potentially prove inconvenient.

Overall, though, the Hot+Cool HF1 is a satisfyingly efficient fan heater. While it has a high price tag, it’s worth it for the performance and convenience, especially with those clever smart features.

If you’d like to explore more options, our guide to the best fans has our top recommendations.

Dyson Hot+Cool HF1 review: price & availability

• List price: £399.99
• Launch date: October 2025 (UK)
• Availability: UK only at time of publishing

The HF1 is a premium option packed with some fantastic features, but as is often the case with Dyson, it has a premium price tag to match, costing £399.99.

The Dyson Hot+Cool HF1 is currently only available in the UK, and can be purchased from Dyson, Currys, and a few other retailers.

There’s a price difference of £150 between the HF1 and the Dyson Cool CF1, which is actually pretty reasonable considering the addition of Hot mode and the fantastic smart features.

Overall, with its good performance and a number of convenient features, the Dyson Hot+Cool HF1 won't disappoint if you have the money to spare. However, it’s worth considering the drawbacks I’ve covered in my review to ensure they won’t pose an inconvenience before you stretch your budget.

• Value for money score: 4 / 5

Dyson Hot+Cool HF1 review: specs

Type

Fan heater

Speeds

10

Oscillation

15, 40, 70 degrees

Dimensions

8 x 8 x 23 inches / 20.4 x 20.4 x 58.5cm

Weight

5.12 1bs / 2.6kg

Control

Onboard buttons, remote, app

Timer

Yes

Additional modes

Sleep mode

Dyson Hot+Cool HF1 review: design and features

• Small and lightweight design, which can be tilted
• The HF1 has 10 fan speeds and outputs temperatures up to 90ºF / 32ºC
• MyDyson app offers extra settings and features, including a pre-heat function

Setting up the Dyson Hot+Cool HF1 was a quick and simple process of attaching the plastic base plate and connecting the HF1 to the MyDyson app.

The Dyson Hot+Cool HF1 is conveniently sized, with a max diameter of 8 inches / 20.4cm once the base is attached; however, at 23 inches / 58.5cm, it might feel a smidge tall for desktop use.

Though it feels a little wrong, as I’m used to using larger-scale formats like the Dyson HP10, it worked perfectly well on the floor. Whether you place it on a tabletop or the floor, the vertical angle of the airflow can be adjusted slightly by shifting the fan’s body backwards or forward to tilt it.

(Image credit: Future)

Predictably, the Dyson Hot+Cool HF1 fan features a bladeless design, making it easier to clean and a safer option to bladed fans for those who happen to have curious offspring or pets.

In addition to its 10 fan speeds, the HF1 can oscillate 15, 40, or 70 degrees. Both of these functions can be adjusted via the onboard controls, with a power button/dial combo that can be turned to increase or decrease the fan speed, a button to cycle through oscillation angles, and another button that enables Hot mode.

Hot mode offers a temperature range of up to 90ºF / 32ºC, and the combination of the ceramic heater plates and Air Multiplier technology can apparently increase whole-room temperature by one degree in as little as one hundred seconds.

(Image credit: Future)

Like the Dyson Cool CF1, the Hot+Cool HF1 also comes with the standard Dyson-style magnetic remote control, which can be stored on top of the loop amplifier. It features power, oscillation, fan speed, and temperature control buttons, as well as ones to enable sleep mode, set the timer, and engage the child lock.

One advantage the HF1 has over the Cool CF1 is its app integration, which gives access to an advanced range of settings, historical temperature readings, outdoor air quality data, and easy remote control, whether you’re out and about or sitting on the couch. Plus, there’s the option to connect the HF1 to your smart home system, so it can be controlled without lifting a finger.

Perhaps the most exciting aspect of the HF1's smart capabilities is the ability to preheat a room to your desired temperature, ready for when you return home.

• Design score: 4 / 5

Dyson Hot+Cool HF1 review: performance

• Good performance for its size in both Cool and Hot modes
• Very easy to control, thanks to the MyDyson app
• Quiet overall, but noisy while getting up to temperature in Hot mode

The Dyson Hot+Cool HF1 was simple and straightforward to use, especially when using the app. I often used the remote, too, but there was a bit of a lag whenever I made an adjustment, and the HF1 didn’t register the command at all at times.

When testing from my couch, which was around 6ft / 1.8m away from where I’d placed the HF1, the breeze from speed one wasn’t really detectable when the fan was static, which isn’t really a surprise considering its size. However, when I set it to oscillate at 40 degrees, it was enough to give a gentle and surprisingly effective cooling breeze.

As you’d imagine, the breeze felt a little more prominent with each setting increase, until speed five, when the airflow felt noticeably amplified, and I could hear a quiet windrush past my ears.

(Image credit: Future)

The airflow was satisfyingly strong at top speed 10, though it was a little noisy at 45dB from 6 feet away, which was loud enough for me to need to turn the volume up on my TV.

When I measured the sound output of the HF1 in Cool mode from the usual 2ft distance, I found that it produced a similar volume to the Dyson Cool CF1 and the Levoit Circulair. However, its readings of 29dB at speed one, 36dB at speed five, and 50dB at speed ten, conveyed that the HF1 is a whole 10dB louder at its top speed than the Meacofan Sefte 8in.

These aren’t bad volumes, though, with the HF1 operating as quietly as a whisper, to as loud as moderate rainfall when in Cool mode. Some may find the oscillation sound mildly distracting because, as I discovered when reviewing the Cool CF1, it’s reminiscent of the droning of a document scanner. The oscillation itself is only around 28dB, however, and the whirring was subtle enough that I could fall asleep to it.

(Image credit: Future)

As it’s getting mighty chilly in the UK as I write this, I’ve been very grateful to have the opportunity to test out Hot mode.

I could easily find out the current room temperature by looking at the fan’s display or checking the app, and the temperature was very straightforward to adjust a degree at a time using the buttons or the slider in the app.

It’s important to note that, while Dyson states that the HF1 is safe for family and pets as there are no exposed heater elements, it would appear this doesn’t eliminate the chance of scalding, as I found that the metallic edging around the air outlets became too hot to touch within just a couple of minutes in Hot mode at 73ºF / 23ºC.

Hot mode starts off noticeably louder than Cool mode. The HF1 is fairly quiet for the first few moments, then quickly ramps up before settling down to a consistent volume. For example, when using Hot mode at fan speed five, the volume quickly rose to 42dB, then settled down to 37dB.

(Image credit: Future)

True to Dyson’s claim, the HF1 did increase the temperature by a degree in less than two minutes, though I’m not sure how accurate the temperature reading is when it comes to the ambient temperature across a large room.

As the ambient temperature is monitored for Hot mode, I would have liked to see Dyson use it for an auto function for Cool mode so that it could adjust the fan speed based on how hot the room is, as I loved this feature in the Meacofan Sefte 8in.

Another change I’d love to see is the extension of the child lock beyond the onboard controls, so the remote cannot be used either. Having access to the app should mean this wouldn't cause inconvenience for adults, but even if not, Dyson could take a leaf out of other brands’ books and assign a combination of buttons to unlock the remote.

(Image credit: Future)

When I set the HF1 to sleep mode at bedtime, it turned off the display and reduced the fan speed to four, which has a volume of 29dB, though I could still adjust the speed if required.

Due to the weather in the UK right now, I mostly used the hot mode overnight. Aware that a key feature of the HF1 is that it will start up whenever the temperature drops, and having witnessed how noisy Hot mode can get, I set it to fan speed one to minimize disturbances.

(Image credit: Future)

I can recall it waking me up at one point in the early hours of the morning, but it wasn’t loud enough to shock me awake, and I fell back to sleep once it had settled down. It should hopefully be bearable enough for most people, but I definitely wouldn’t recommend it if you’re a particularly light sleeper.

While the hot mode might be good for speedy heating, it would be great if the sleep mode could increase the heat gradually, so there wouldn't be such a sudden volume increase. It’s also worth noting that the display doesn’t appear to turn off when in sleep mode if you’re using the heat function.

Overall, though, I quite like the Dyson Hot+Cool HF1. I appreciate how no fan speed felt redundant from six feet away, and that it was light enough to relocate without much effort. So, while the HF1 may not be the right fan heater for you if you’re a light sleeper who intends to use Hot mode overnight, for everyone else its smart features, effortless remote control, energy-saving Hot mode, and satisfying airflow make it a great choice.

• Performance score: 4 / 5

Should I buy the Dyson Hot+Cool HF1?

Section

Notes

Score

Value for money

The HF1 is a premium-priced fan heater, but it’s worth it for the convenient smart features and well-performing functions.

4/5

Design

This bladeless fan heater is satisfyingly compact and easy to control, thanks mainly to the MyDyson app, which houses a host of settings and smart features.

4/5

Performance

The HF1 performed well during testing, delivering surprisingly strong airflow for its size. The smart features proved convenient, especially the pre-heating function. However, the heater’s louder volumes and the hot surface of the air outlet might be a cause for concern for some.

4/5

Buy it if...

You want to preheat a room ready for when you arrive home
Having the opportunity to set off Hot mode remotely is fantastic, as it ensures a toasty welcome once you’re in and ready to slump down on the couch.

You love smart appliances
With smart home integration, remote app control, and temperature data, the HF1 is a great choice for anyone who wants to get the most out of their devices.

Don't buy it if...

You’re a light sleeper
While I appreciated not waking up to a freezing cold room, I was woken by the noise of the fan starting up to maintain the target temperature.

You’re on a budget
While the HF1 is well-performing and convenient, its price tag is undeniably high. Therefore, it would be cheaper to buy a separate fan and heater from a more affordable brand.

Dyson Hot+Cool HF1 review: Also consider

Dyson Hot+Cool HF1

Shark TurboBlade Cool + Heat

Dyson Purifier Hot+Cool Gen1 HP10

Type

Fan heater

Fan heater

Purifying fan heater

Price

£399.99

$399.99 / £349.99

$529.99 / £549.99

Speed settings

10

10

10

Oscillation

Up to 70 degrees

Up to 180 degrees

Up to 350 degrees

Timer

Up to 9 hours

Up to 8 hours

Up to 8 hours

Controls

Onboard buttons, remote, app

Touchscreen buttons, remote

Onboard buttons, remote

Companion app

Yes

No

No

Additional modes

Sleep mode

Natural Breeze, Sleep, BreezeBoost, Thermo IQ, Focus, and Comfort mode

Auto purifying, Sleep mode

Dimensions

8 x 8 x 23 inches / 20.4 x 20.4 x 58.5cm

13.8 x 11.8 x 45.9 in / 35.1 x 30 x 116.6cm

9.8 x 9.8 x 30.2 inches / 25 x 25 x 77cm

Weight

5.12 lbs / 2.6kg

19.8 lbs / 9kg

11.7 lbs / 5.3kg

Shark TurboBlade Cool + Heat
If you want something a little more powerful that can distribute the airflow over a larger space, it’s worth looking at this Shark fan heater. The fan’s arms can be positioned horizontally, vertically, and diagonally, and the vents can be adjusted so that they slant up, down, or straight forward, offering plenty of opportunity to perfect the airflow direction. It also has a broader range of oscillation than the HF1, as it can oscillate up to 180 degrees. If you’d like to learn more, check out our full Shark TurboBlade Cool + Heat review.

Dyson Purifier Hot+Cool Gen1 HP10
The HP10 is practically a larger version of the HF1 without the smart features and temperature sensor, but it has the added benefit of air purifying, which makes it a good choice if you’re trying to save space. It’s also a great choice if you’re concerned about the hot edging of the HF1, as I didn’t find the all-plastic casing of the loop amplifier to get anywhere near as toasty. It operates quietly for its size, and I’ve become particularly fond of its heat functions over the last few months. If you’re in the market for an air purifier alongside your fan heater, take a look at my full Dyson Purifier Hot+Cool Gen1 HP10 review.

How I tested the Dyson Hot+Cool HF1

• I used the Dyson Hot+Cool HF1 in multiple locations
• I explored the features and settings in the MyDyson app
• I evaluated the strength of the airflow and the sound levels

I unboxed the Dyson Hot+Cool HF1, attached its base, and set it up on the MyDyson app. I tested it out on different surface heights, on the floor, and next to my bed. I did most of my testing with the HF1 where I usually place my table fans, about six feet away from my couch and near my bed at nighttime.

I adjusted the settings using the onboard controls, the remote control, and the MyDyson app. In the app, I went through the setup process before exploring the different settings and sections.

I used all the fan speeds in Hot and Cool mode, and measured the sound output. I used it in Hot mode on my bedroom windowsill when I went to bed at night, using the timer so that I didn’t get too toasty after I fell asleep.

• First reviewed: October 2025
• Read TechRadar's Reviews Guarantee

Samsung Galaxy XR: Two-minute review

I think I finally understand why Apple's Vision Pro costs so darn much. The Samsung Galaxy XR delivers moments of beauty and inspiration, but it's also stuffed full of disappointment, from the sound of fans on your face to imprecision of gestures to a total lack of 'wow' apps and experiences.

Yes, Gemini is in there, and I spent a lot of time with it riding side-saddle during my testing; but I soon grew tired of hearing it say, "Let me check that for you." Instead of a smart companion, it often felt like a slightly inexperienced assistant who covers that lack of expertise with long pauses, as if it's doing a Google search before responding.

It's not just in the operation that there are shortcomings. The headset feels lighter and overall more comfortable than the Vision Pro, but also manages to feel less premium. If anything, the design looks and feels mixed-reality headset retro, like something Microsoft and its partners might have introduced five years ago.

(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future)

The lack of a way to integrate my Windows desktop workflow was also frustrating (the headset currently only works with Samsung Galaxy Books) and forced me to be more intentional in my use. I could be inside Android XR or I could be productive on my laptop, but never both.

There is some elegance in the overall Android XR platform, but I also felt like it wasn't nearly as cohesive as, say, visionOS.

Among the positives are the video viewing experience and Dolby audio. It all looked and sounded great, and I could see watching a movie on that big virtual screen.

The immersive environments are impressive, but no more so than Apple's. Overall, I wondered, "Where are the dinosaurs? Where's the virtual butterfly landing on my fingertip? Where's the magic?"

So, yes, the Samsung Galaxy XR is way cheaper than the Vision Pro, but it has not arrived fully realized, or with any of the excitement I expect from a next-gen spatial computer.

Samsung Galaxy XR: Price and availability

Half the price of the Vision Pro

Still expensive compared to VR headsets

Samsung unveiled the Galaxy XR mixed reality headset on October 21 in the US and South Korea. It's priced at $1,799 (availability and pricing for other regions is TBC, but that price converts to about £1,340 or AU$2,770).

For those who wear prescription glasses, Kodak lens inserts start at $99. Samsung is also selling optional controllers for $249, and an optional carrying case for $249.

Value score: 4.5

Samsung Galaxy XR: What's in the box

• The Samsung Galaxy XR mixed reality headset
• Extra forehead spanner
• Battery with an attached cable
• USB-C charging cable and adapter
• Rubber light seals
• Rubber and felt cover
• A polishing cloth

Samsung Galaxy XR: Specs

Samsung Galaxy XR

Apple Vision Pro M5

Meta Quest 3

Meta Quest Pro

Dimensions

170mm wide x 280mm long

Est: 152 x 101 x 101mm / 6 x 4 x 4 inches

184 x 160 x 98mm / 7.2 x 6.3 x 3.9 inches

265 x 127 x 196mm / 10.4 x 5 x 7.7 inches

Weight

545g

From 1.3lbs / 600g

1.14lbs / 515g

1.6lbs / 722g

Display

micro-OLED 

Dual micro-OLED

Two LCD displays

Two LCD displays

Display resolution

3552 x 3840 dual (27M pixels)

4K per eye (23 million pixels)

2064 x 2208 pixels per eye

1920 x 1080 per eye

FOV

109-degree

Est 100-degree

110-degree horizontal, 96-degree vertical

120-degree

Refresh rate

60Hz, 72Hz, 90Hz

90Hz, 96Hz, 120Hz

72Hz, 80Hz, 90Hz, 120Hz

90Hz

Chipset

Qualcomm Snapdragon® XR2+ Gen 2 Platform 

Apple silicon M2, R1

Qualcomm Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2

Qualcomm Snapdragon XR2+

RAM

16GB

16GB

8GB

12GB

Storage

256GB

256GB, 512GB, 1TB

128GB or 512GB

256GB

Battery life

2 hours

3 hours (rated for video)

2 hours 12 minutes

2 hours

Samsung Galaxy XR: Design and display

• Decent if slightly retro design
• A lot of plastic, and doesn't exude a premium feel
• Comparatively lightweight, and better balanced than the Vision Pro
• External battery pack and cable

There's naturally going to be a trade-off between weight and premium materials with a device such as this. With the Vision Pro, Apple took the 'no expense spared' approach, and the result is a beautiful set of goggles that balance glass, magnesium, aluminum, and more – mostly on your face. With the Galaxy XR, Samsung focused, I think, on comfort. That means while we have some glass, all those cameras, and components, we also have a minimal amount of metal, some soft fabric, and a whole lot of plastic.

It looks like a mashup of the Vision Pro and classic VR headsets of a bygone era. The thick stalks jutting out of either side and connecting to the thick, flexible plastic adjustable band remind me of the Microsoft HoloLens, although that headset was far less comfortable, to be fair.

Inside the headset is a removable forehead rest, which comes in two parts: you can use them together for more support (but your eyes are further away from the lenses) or remove the spanner and use just the main cushion part, which has the same magnetic back, which keeps your eyes closer to the lenses. In either case, the Galaxy XR is smart enough to know if your gaze is too far away, and will recommend the right forehead rest.

Opposite that is a brace that cradles the back of your head. There's just one large aluminum knob on the back that you tighten – pulling the flexible stems into the body – for adjustment.

On the left stem is the proprietary power port where you connect the external battery pack. On the right stem is a thin touch-sensitive control bar (which you can double-tap to enter and exit an immersive environment). Each stem features microphone holes so that the headset – or more specifically Gemini – can listen for your prompts.

The stem also features the rather loud and robust speakers, and a sensor on the left side so that the Galaxy XR knows instantly when you're putting it on.

Image 1 of 5

(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future)Image 2 of 5

(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future)Image 3 of 5

(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future)Image 4 of 5

(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future)Image 5 of 5

(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future)

The face area is dark glass through which you can faintly make out six camera lenses (there's no Vision Pro-style external display). The frame is aluminum, with cutouts along the bottom for two more lenses near the nose bridge, speakers, vents, and more microphones. The top features a pair of wide vents and two buttons. On the left is a button you can use to summon the main menu or Gemini, and on the other is a volume rocker.

The Galaxy XR also ships with a rubber cover to protect the glass, and a pair of light shields that magnetically snap into the headset, cutting off much of the light leaking in from below, and are useful for when you want to enjoy a fully immersive experience like a movie or game. They're not as effective as the Vision Pro's more cohesive light seal, but they may be more comfortable.

Even though the Galaxy XR is only 65g lighter than the Vision Pro, it feels significantly lighter on my head. This is due, in part, to how Samsung has balanced the weight across the entire body of the device, and also to those aforementioned materials, and the lack of an external display.

I'd say Samsung and its partners (Qualcomm and Google) made all the right choices when it comes to comfort. Don't misunderstand me though – I've come to accept that even with this level of comfort, there's nothing natural about wearing a headset for any significant length of time. The Galaxy XR can still get uncomfortable after a while (say 45 minutes), and my wife called me "space man" every time she caught me wearing it.

In general, the Samsung Galaxy XR is not as elegant as the Vision Pro, but it's otherwise fit for purpose.

Inside the headset are the two round lenses behind which sit a pair of micro-OLED displays together supporting 27 million pixels (the Vision Pro, by contrast, supports 23 million pixels). It's a stereo display system that supports up to a 90Hz refresh rate (below the Vision Pro M5's 120Hz) and a 109-degree field of view (better than the Vision Pro's 100 degrees).

Samsung failed to provide my lens inserts in time for this review, so I arrived at a somewhat novel solution to continue my tests: I used the lens inserts from the Vision Pro M5 I just finished testing. They're not a perfect fit, in that the shape of the lenses in the Vision Pro is more aviator style, and the insets for the XR appear to be circular. Even so, this effectively corrected my vision and made everything crystal clear. I did try to use my glasses, but my thick frames blocked some of the imagery.

After almost a week of testing, the Kodak lens inserts arrived, but they did not change my experience in any noticeable way.

Image 1 of 3

(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future)Image 2 of 3

(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future)Image 3 of 3

(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future)

Design and Display score 4

Samsung Galaxy XR: Set-up

Like the Vision Pro, the Samsung Galaxy XR is an intelligent wearable that works with you to calibrate your experience. As soon as I put on the headset, and after I struggled a bit to find the best and most comfortable fit, it started to adjust the lenses for my pupilary distance (I could actually hear the motors moving things around).

If you have the optional lens inserts, the system automatically recognizes them as soon as you put them in, then it asks you to scan a QR code that came with the lens inserts (ostensibly containing the prescription info) so that adjustments can be made accordingly.

Early on, the system walks you through its control metaphors, and lets you use your hands to virtually squish floating blobs. But this is really just the beginning.

There are a couple of ways to control the Galaxy XR, with just your hands or with your gaze and hands. For the former, you reach out and touch virtual elements, pushing buttons and squeezing objects. For the latter, you look at the object and, while keeping your hands in your lap, pinch, pull, or subtly move.

If you choose gaze-based control, the Galaxy XR system walks you through a visual calibration process that's quite similar to what I experienced with the Vision Pro, having me look at a series of floating dots and pinch my fingers as my eyes rested on each one.

You can secure the Galaxy XR through a password, PIN, or iris recognition. I chose the eye scanning, after which the XR had me stare at a pair of overlapping green and blue dots.

Samsung calls the Galaxy XR an "AI" device, so it's no surprise that Gemini is part of the setup process. There are three ways to summon Gemini: through the on-board app, by long-pressing the button on he right side, or via voice, which requires you to begin a conversation with "Hey Google" (no, not "Hey, Gemini").

You can also press the button to pause Gemini's listening mode.

Samsung Galaxy XR: Software and experience

• Generally intuitive
• Occasional lack of gesture and gaze precision can prove frustrating
• Gemini integration doesn't feel fully realized
• It sometimes feels more like a Samsung phone than a next-gen spatial experience
• Almost total lack of 'wow' software

The Samsung Galaxy XR home screen is familiar as a competitor to the Vision Pro. It's not as pretty, but the configuration of round icons is similar. It's also, though, clearly a Samsung Android device, with apps for Samsung's Internet, Notes, Gallery (please, why not just Google Photos?), and other recognizable phone-like elements.

Above the app grid is a home button, a capsule containing Google and Gemini logos, and another capsule with open apps, alerts, and quick settings (there's also a full settings app icon in the main menu).

Above that are the time, date, Gemini's current mode ('Listening' or 'Paused'), Wi-Fi status, and percentage of battery life remaining.

(Image credit: Future)

Samsung and its partners designed the Galaxy XR to be an intuitive system, where a look and a subtle gesture will get the job done.

As I looked around, I noticed various interface elements highlighted with gray boxes around them. I think I prefer the Vision Pro's more starkly animated selection metaphor.

Image 1 of 5

(Image credit: Future)Image 2 of 5

(Image credit: Future)Image 3 of 5

(Image credit: Future)Image 4 of 5

(Image credit: Future)Image 5 of 5

(Image credit: Future)

You can grab entire screens and move them around; you just have to look at a corner, and a wide swath of area will start to glow around the window. Grab that, and you can move the window around in 3D space. Alternatively, you can look at a corner and grab a glowing white circle near it to stretch and shrink the window.

That's how it should work anyway. In practice, I sometimes struggled mightily to properly grab these screen elements.

More problematically, the system seems to have trouble settling on an object. I had to be quite precise with my gaze and pinch gestures. Sometimes, I would try to help by reaching out and moving my hand, which triggered the system's glowing white dot mouse selector. Other times, when I intended to access an interface element, I accidentally grabbed the window and threw it behind me.

There were far too many instances where I was muttering to myself, "No, that, not that… wait, that's wrong."

(Image credit: Future)

Gemini is an intrinsic part of the Galaxy XR experience. When you enable Gemini Live, you can let it see what you see and then interrogate it about whatever's in front of you. That sounds amazing, but since most of us will not be walking around outside our home or offices when wearing the Galaxy XR, it'll mostly be telling you about a world you already know.

It may, though, come in handy for tasks like putting together a new bike, if you're comfortable wearing a $1,799 headset while performing that task.

Gemini can be a help for navigating the system, opening apps, and even finding the right content. I asked Gemini to open YouTube and find me some DIY content, and it quickly complied.

(Image credit: Future)

When I played an XR-designed game called 'Inside Job,' I asked Gemini to describe what was on screen. It accurately described the simulated workplace scene, but was less helpful when it came to gameplay and strategy.

(Image credit: Future)

Gemini Live can't generate images, but when I opened the Gemini app and asked for a picture of a donkey driving a car, it quickly complied and generated the image. I then used gestures to copy the image, open Gmail, paste the image, and mail it to myself.

(Image credit: Future)

If you leave Gemini on all the time you can just keep a running conversation going, but it can get kind of annoying to have Gemini constantly interjecting, and I did not enjoy the fact that almost every time I asked it to do something, it would repeat the phrase, "Let me check that for you." Fortunately, you can pause Gemini with a press of one of the top buttons.

Image 1 of 2

(Image credit: Future)Image 2 of 2

(Image credit: Future)

Google Circle to Search is also present, but enabling it takes some practice. First, you have to look at your palm. Then you pinch your thumb and index finger until the Google 'G' logo appears. Then you turn your hand back toward the virtual screen and circle what you want to search on. After that, Google runs a quick search, and a floating results box appears next to the circled item. In my case, I circled a chair laden with bed sheets, and Google accurately identified the exact chair. Aside from the convoluted process, it's a pretty impressive feature.

Image 1 of 4

(Image credit: Future)Image 2 of 4

(Image credit: Future)Image 3 of 4

(Image credit: Future)Image 4 of 4

(Image credit: Future)

Like the Vision Pro, this is a wearable computer, rich with pre-installed apps and connected to a world of app options in the Google Play Store. Not all are designed for the XR experience, so I did my best to find ones that at least understood the platform and its control metaphors. Apps like YouTube and Gmail work smoothly, but third-party apps like, for instance, Spatial TV can be disappointing, especially when they do not follow interface control metaphors.

On YouTube, I watched a Red Bull-produced 3D video called World’s Fastest Drone Camera vs F1 car. While the screen didn't fill my view, I found I could use the quick settings to turn on Virtual Environments and then settle in to watch a video in a daytime or nighttime mountain landscape.

(Image credit: Future)

The video was fun and compelling, but I never felt like I got as up-close to the action as I do when viewing some of Apple's Immersive content. I think more people have to shoot content specifically for the Galaxy XR and take better advantage of all those millions of pixels.

I also watched a 3D trailer for Avatar: The Way of Water that looked excellent.

(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future)

You have the option to create a 3D, cartoonish avatar of yourself for interactive play and activities. These are not very compelling, and I await the life-like avatars Samsung showed off during the Samsung Galaxy XR launch event.

The headset is also a great way to view photos and to convert them into spatial (stereo) experiences. While I wish the spatial conversion icon in the Google Photos App was more than a graphic (a 'Make 3D' label would be nice), the effect works well on virtually any photo – and the effect is even better when you go 'Immersive' and remove the photo borders.

Image 1 of 4

(Image credit: Future)Image 2 of 4

(Image credit: Future)Image 3 of 4

(Image credit: Future)Image 4 of 4

(Image credit: Future)

One of the best experiences is Google Maps, an app nearly perfectly built for voice, gaze, and gesture control. I loved asking Gemini to whisk me off to a faraway place in Maps, then I used my eyes and hands to fly around. I could drop down to street level, and use gaze and gestures to virtually walk around a city. I could even go inside some businesses.

After some back and forth with Samsung I did figure out how to connect the Galaxy XR to a Samsung Galaxy Book. You start by selecting PC Link in the XR's quick settings, then you go into the display settings on the laptop and choose to connect to it as a wireless display. The virtual screen that appears is sharp, and can be as big as you want it, but it's not curved like the Vision Pro's virtual MacBook display. Plus, since the pass-through isn't as clear (I need to see the laptop's real keyboard after all), I can't imagine myself working for any length of time in this setup.

Throughout my time using the Samsung Galaxy XR I could hear the fan running. It's not that anyone else could hear it, but since it was on my face and close to my ears, well, I could hear it almost anytime I wore the headset. On the one hand, I know this means that a powerful chip is running inside. On the other hand, isn't there a more elegant and less noisy way to dissipate system heat?

Perhaps if I hadn't spent the last two years using the original Vision Pro, and hadn't just reviewed the M5 model, I might feel differently; this would all feel new to me, after all. But you can't turn back the clock, and the Samsung Galaxy XR has arrived after the first and best spatial computer. Its interface metaphors are well known, and virtually perfect. Samsung's interface and level of control feel, at times, like a cheap imitation – it is indeed a lot cheaper, and does feel at least somewhat influenced by the Vision Pro.

Overall, the experience does show promise, but it needs more bespoke apps, fewer duplicate Samsung apps (Bixby? Really?), even deeper integration of Gemini, better hand and eye tracking, and maybe an interface upgrade.

Software and Experience score: 3.5

Samsung Galaxy XR: Battery and performance

• The external battery is a bit heavy and will need a pocket
• Long-lasting
• The cable is long enough
• The proprietary attachment system is dependable

(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future)

When it comes to powering its spatial computer, Samsung made the same decision as Apple: keep the weight of the battery off the head. So even though the Samsung Galaxy XR looks a little bit like a HoloLens, there's no weighty battery on the back of your head.

Instead, you get a roughly half-pound battery pack attached to a roughly 3.5-foot woven cable that ends in a proprietary adapter. There's a little button on the top that you use to release it from the headset. The battery pack also includes a USB-C-in charge port for recharging the brick.

(Image credit: Lance Ulanoff / Future)

As for longevity, the pack is pretty impressive. It got me through a full day of intermittent use, although it's rated for about two hours of continuous use, which is slightly less than the Vision Pro's battery pack.

You might attribute the battery life to, in part, a rather efficient and AR/VR/AI-ready bit of silicon, the Qualcomm Snapdragon XR2+ Gen 2 Platform (backed by 16GB of RAM and 256GB of storage), which, while obviously generating some serious heat (see my comments re the fan noise above), seems to be rather efficient. As for the overall power, I don't have benchmarks, but as I noted, AI image creation was pretty fast, and all other operations were smooth, including web browsing, video watching, and game-play.

Battery and Performance score: 4.5

Should you buy the Samsung Galaxy XR?

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Value

Far cheaper than the competition and generally good value for the price

4

Battery and Performance

Backed by 16GB of RAM, the Qualcomm Snapdragon XR2+ Gen 2 Platform  provides plenty of power for smooth performance throughout, but obviously needs a fan to keep it cool. Battery life is impressive

4.5/5

Design and Display

It's a decent if slightly retro design with good-enough materials, but Samsung gets major points for the device's light weight and balance. The displays are sharp, and provide more pixels than a Vision Pro

4/5

Software and Experience

Samsung needs to take a long hard look at the gaze and eye tracking, which were not nearly precise enough for my tastes. The interface is good but also a little reductive. I would not have kept so many Samsung-specific apps in there, and Samsung needs more eye-popping XR-specific experiences.

Gemini integration is good but feels like it could go further

3.5/5

Buy it if... 

You want a spatial computer that doesn't rely on Apple

The Vision Pro has owned this space for two years, but the exorbitant price and overbearing weight made it a non-starter for many. Maybe a cheaper, lighter, Android-friendly headset is more your style.

You love Gemini and want the immersive experience

The Samsung Galaxy XR headset brings the generative platform to mixed reality. This is your chance to get in on the ground floor of a very new experience.

You want to see what Samsung, Qualcomm, and Google can accomplish
These three tech amigos put their heads together to make this one-of-a-kind multi-modal AI headset.

Don’t buy it if… 

You don't want to spend more than $1,000 for a mixed-reality experience
The Samsung Galaxy XR is far cheaper than the Vision Pro, but it's still $1,799, and that's without the $249 case.

You use a Mac or Intel-PC
For now, there's no way to integrate a virtual desktop experience unless you own a Samsung Galaxy Book.

Also consider

Apple Vision Pro M5
Expensive? Yes. Heavy? It can be, but the new band helps. Plus, there's still no better mixed-reality, spatial computing experience on the market. This is the apex predator of the category, with the best interface, best looks, and best experiences on the market. What it doesn't have is any truly decent AI. For that, the Galaxy XR is really your only choice.View Deal

PlayStation VR 2
TechRadar Gaming called the PSVR 2 headset "an experience that’ll be well worth your hard-earned cash." If you have a PS5 already and want a VR headset, this is the headset to check out.

Check out TRG's PSVR 2 review

Meta Quest Pro
An excellent VR headset with great passthrough, mixed reality, and some hand-tracking that's also a fraction of the Vision Pro's price, and is supported by a well-baked ecosystem and a rich collection of apps.

Meta Quest 3
We call this the "best VR headset for most people", and considering the far more affordable price and vast number of apps built specifically for the platform, this might be, even with its less-impressive visual quality, a more attainable and reasonable option than the Vision Pro.

Nreal Air AR Glasses
The Nreal Air AR Glasses are nothing like the Vision Pro (or any other VR headset, for that matter), but they're nevertheless an intriguing AR gadget that effectively offers you your own private theater viewing of whatever is happening on your connected device's screen. It's pretty neat, and potentially a great pick for commuters.

How we test

For my Samsung Galaxy XR review, I spent a week wearing the headset. I watched movies, played games, drew, and used Gemini

Read more about how we test

• First reviewed November 2025