Feed aggregator

Ugreen 10,000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank review

Anyone on the hunt for a power bank will have likely come across Ugreen, a relatively new Chinese brand looking to wrest Anker’s grip on the sector, with its plentiful offerings at budget-friendly prices.

Just like Anker’s wireless power banks, the Ugreen 10,000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank is simple and to the point. Two colorways are available: black and white. Every side of the unit is smooth and flat, free from any protrusions or indentations. And the only interface comes in the form of a series of LED lights, indicating battery levels and charging status.

For a wireless power bank with a large capacity, the Ugreen 10,000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank is pleasingly light and lean like the best power banks, making it relatively easy to carry around. However, with an iPhone attached, I found it was still too bulky to pocket with ease – although I’ve yet to encounter a 10,000mAh wireless power bank that isn’t.

The Ugreen 10,000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank can wirelessly charge the best iPhones thanks to its MagSafe compatibility, offering 15W of power. During my tests, it was able to charge an iPhone 13 Pro from 50% to 100% in under two hours, draining the bank’s battery by somewhere between 25-50%, as indicated by the loss of one of the four LED dots.

Wired charging via the single USB-C port is more powerful at 20W. I managed to charge a Google Pixel 7a from 50% to 100% in just over an hour, with the Ugreen 10,000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank again losing one dot in the process. Charging the bank itself from empty to full took about two and a half hours, which is reasonable, roughly equal to the charging time of the Anker MagGo (10K).

The durability of the charging pad material is questionable. During my tests of the 5,000mAh variant, the pad began to show signs of wear. Since this is the same material, I have my concerns about this model's durability as well. It’s also fond of picking up fluff and other debris, which I haven't found with the materials on other MagSafe power banks, such as those offered by Anker.

The Ugreen 10,000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank costs $49 / £49 (about AU$72), which undercuts the Anker MagGo Power Bank (10K) by a considerable margin. However, that bank does appear to have greater durability, owing to its hard charging pad material. Some variants also get a useful digital display, with precise battery levels and charging time estimations, making them an all-round better pick than the Ugreen 10,000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank.

(Image credit: Future) Ugreen 10,000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank review: Price & specs

(Image credit: Future) Should I buy the Ugreen 10,000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank? Buy it if…

You need a large yet practical power bank
For a 10,000mAh power bank, the Ugreen is surprisingly light and slender. But like all wireless banks this size, you’ll still struggle to fit it in your pocket with an iPhone attached.

You’re on a budget
Ugreen seems to be on a mission to undercut Anker at every turn, so if you’re on a tight budget, the Ugreen 10,000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank could be tempting.

Don't buy it if…

You want something durable
The silicone pad doesn’t seem to be the most durable, so you may want a harder-wearing alternative.

You have an Android
While there are MagSafe-compatible cases for Android phones, they still don’t officially support Apple’s standard, so don’t be surprised if the Ugreen 10,000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank won’t charge your device.

Ugreen 10,000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank review: Also consider

Anker MagGo Power Bank (10k)
A more feature-rich alternative, the Anker MagGo has 15W wireless and 27W wired charging power, as well as a digital display showing the bank’s battery percentage and estimated charging times. It also comes with a folding stand, allowing you to view your iPhone in landscape or portrait easily while charging. It is slightly heavier than the Ugreen 10,000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank, though, and it’s considerably more expensive.View Deal

A dozen Black canvassers were tricked, threatened, and driven in seatless U-Haul vans. They were fired after WIRED reported on their plight—some without full pay or a way back home.

We scoured Amazon and found all the best Christmas decorations, from lights to trees and everything in between. All it takes is a few clicks to make your season merry and bright.

Much-improved Cleveland hosts LA at Huntington Bank Field.

Want to watch Dallas play Atlanta? Here's everything you need to stream Sunday's 1 p.m. ET game on Fox.

On October 29, we reported that the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) had published the annual survey of its predicted top fitness trends for 2025. The research provides “valuable data for fitness professionals, business owners and exercise enthusiasts,” designed to “help inform critical business decisions and professional development plan”, according to the ACSM report. These trends varied by region, but we’ll largely be discussing the United States-orientated trends in this article.

While wearable technology (such as the best fitness trackers) remained at the top spot, “mobile exercise apps” aka the best fitness apps came in at number two and “data-driven training” at number three. These two often go hand-in-hand, with apps and wearables providing easy ways to record granular information about your training, from heart rate to explosive power, and use those metrics to guide you into training more effectively.

Wearables, apps and (by extension) data-driven training have gotten smarter, frighteningly so. In-app AI chatbots can draw from your personal data recorded via the app, often with an attached wearable, and recommend the next steps to your training. You can use virtual pacers to race against yourself. Within apps like PUSH and Garmin Connect, training plans can take your last few sessions’ worth of performance into account and adjust themselves automatically.

One category that didn’t make the top 10 this year is “personal training” which fell to number 15. While still prevalent in many countries and popular enough to squeeze its way into the top 20, its sharp fall from the top 10 “warrants attention” according to the report, which also noted “employing certified exercise professionals only appears as a top 10 trend in Portugal and Australia”.

Cause and Effect

(Image credit: Future / PUSH)

Looking at the highest trending topics, it’s easy to see correlation and causation. According to the US National Strength and Conditioning Association, hiring a personal trainer (PT) can cost anywhere from $25-$100 a session. This is presumably on top of a gym membership or day rate, which you’ll need to access the space.

When you can get a YouTube channel that shows you the moves for free, or an AI-powered fitness app that provides you feedback for $8.99 a month, it’s hard for many people undergoing a cost of living crisis to justify hiring a PT as anything other than a major luxury, like a massage or a spa day.

To say that you can get the full experience of in-person personal training from an app on your phone would be an insult to the hard-working personal trainers who are fantastic coaches, motivators and experts in their field. However, there’s no denying that personal training, once the bastion of the fitness industry, is losing popularity, and PTs are having to diversify their revenue streams to make it in 2024. This income can come from offering online classes, writing books to better market themselves as experts, creating their own training app or social media community, or becoming part-time content creators.

Very few PTs are likely to have signed up knowing they’ll need to be effective writers, programmers, salespeople or on-camera talent: there was a time when all you needed was to be very good at training people, but those days are long gone. The most successful PTs now are the most effective brand-builders and content marketers, not necessarily the best coaches.

Now that data-driven apps and wearables can provide passable programming and even feedback via a chatbot, the fitness industry has become the latest in a long line of sectors to be hit hard by automation and AI. I’m not sure what the answer is for all those talented PTs and coaches out there, but I don’t envy them trying to maintain an analog business in a world that, with the advent of AI, has become truly digital-first.

You might also like...

• Best running watches of 2024
• Why the Samsung Galaxy Ring, 2024's biggest (and smallest) wearable, is our Health & Fitness Device of the Year
• I wish this smart heart-rate sensing mouthguard had been invented years ago

Want to watch Washington play New York? Here's everything you need to stream Sunday's 1 p.m. ET game on Fox.

Denver look to make it three wins in a row as they travel to M&T Bank Stadium.

The runaway AFC East leaders look to make it four wins on the spin as they host Miami.

In adults, health effects from digital screens are annoying but temporary. Here's what happens when the display is on your face.

Reolink Doorbell (Battery): one-minute review

The Reolink Doorbell (Battery) is a wireless video doorbell that's solidly built and works without a subscription, but has a few drawbacks when it comes to video latency and smart home compatibility.

The built quality of the Reolink Doorbell (Battery) impresses as soon as you take it out of the box. Reolink has years of experience making external security cameras (including the recently launched Reolink Altas PT), and has brought that experience to bear on this product.

It feels substantial and purposeful when compared to something like the Aqara video doorbell G4 or the Ring Battery video doorbell Plus with its wafer-thin metal front cover. Superior weather protection is most welcome here in the UK, especially if you have a front entrance exposed to the elements.

It boasts a feature set that we've come to expect from the best video doorbells, including package detection, head-to-toe field of view, night vision, and 2K resolution. Plus, unlike some competing products, it works subscription-free; there is no need to store your video in the cloud as you can keep it on a microSD card within the unit (purchased separately).

With its rechargeable battery and Wi-Fi capabilities, installation can be as simple as downloading the app to your phone, drilling two holes, and attaching the doorbell to the door or wall. Reolink produces a range of devices including security cameras, hubs and network video recorders, and the lineage of this battery-powered doorbell is easy to trace.

However, The Reolink Doorbell (Battery) misses the mark in a few key areas; it has limited home automation connectivity and a slow and unreliable connection between the app and the doorbell, plus it’s easily removed from the wall.

(Image credit: Les Watson) Reolink Doorbell (Battery): price and availability

• List price: $145.99 / £159.99 / AU$186.99
• Chimes and smart hub sold separately

The Reolink Doorbell (Battery) launched in September 2024 for $145.99 / £159.99 / AU$186.99, and at the time of writing the company is holding a sale that knocks around 10% off its list price. It can be bought direct from Reolink's online store (which ships worldwide) or from Amazon.

There are also Reolink chimes that let you hear the doorbell easily from anywhere in your home. These cost $19.99 / £23.99 / AU$49.99 each.

Reolink offers a compatible hub for $99.99 / £99.99 / AU$199.99, but I was disappointed that the brand’s solar panels do not appear compatible with the doorbell. It's also not clear how to hardwire the doorbell if you do not have an existing doorbell circuit.

Reolink Doorbell (Battery): specs Reolink Doorbell (Battery): design

• Sleek and attractive design
• Battery is not removable

The Reolink Doorbell (Battery) is a pill-shaped device topped by the camera and sensor housing with a sizeable round button on the lower half. It’s simple and unobtrusive, opting for a less boxy form factor than the market-leading Ring doorbells have to offer. It’s robustly built with long-term outdoor use in mind but has a few quirks that make it a less-than-optimal choice for some households.

It's possible to tell quite a lot about a product and the company that produces it from the box that it comes in. I like a good box, and appreciate the time and effort required to design it; Reolink 'gives good box'.

The manual with readable text larger than that found on microfilm impressed me, but the paper template for drilling the holes in your door/wall is a curious inclusion. If you can't figure out where the holes need to go using the provided plates and screws I would suggest that you put the tools down, hold your hands aloft, and step away from the power drill.

The USB-C charge port is sensibly placed about halfway up the back of the doorbell under a protective rubber flap. Lifting the flap also revealed the MicroSD port into which I inserted a spare card and the supplied USB-C cable.

(Image credit: Les Watson)

I admired the nicely illuminated doorbell button and then…

“Welcome to Reolink, please install the Reolink app and scan the QR code on the camera,” said the nice lady on the doorbell.

“No thank you, I am going to bed now,” said I, but the doorbell had other ideas. “Willkommen bei Reolink, bitte installieren Sie die Reolink-App und scannen Sie den QR-Code auf der Kamera“, sagte die nette Dame an der Türklingel.

I replied to the now very annoying lady using all of the four-letter Anglo Saxon words I could think of, hoping that it would shut up after a while, but no - it repeated the same message in six languages again and again and again. Further frustration ensued when I searched for a QR code to scan since the message did not specify “scan the QR code from within the app”.

Eventually, I found the rather hidden power button and consulted the manual to find that it needed holding down for a few seconds to power down. All the while the doorbell is bellowing like a Eurovision score round. Who thought all of that was a good idea?

Installing the doorbell in battery mode after charging it was simple enough, but I did notice that the mounting plate does not allow for powered installation where a power cable does not present itself directly behind the doorbell. It’s unlikely that existing doorbell wiring will be at the correct height, let alone the right location, meaning the power wire will most likely need to enter the unit from one side or the other and there are no slots in the mounting plate to allow for this.

The two major design flaws are the non-removable rechargeable battery and the ease with which the doorbell can be removed from the wall. I appreciate that using widely available removable rechargeable batteries restricts design choices, but everything else about the doorbell is built to last except for the battery.

Far worse is the ease with which the doorbell can be removed from the mounting plate. Yes, Reolink provides a sturdy removal tool, but you can remove it with a paperclip and, more worryingly, you can also remove the MicroSD card.

Reolink Doorbell (Battery): performance

• Mobile app is easy to navigate, but a little clunky
• Connecting to doorbell via app is slow
• Battery life is shorter than many other doorbells

As much as I like the build quality and Reolink’s attention to detail, it has to be said that connecting to the doorbell through the application is very slow. While the app is uncluttered and easy to navigate, some of the settings could be labeled more clearly. For instance, why are the video quality settings called 'Clear', 'Balanced' and 'Fluent', especially when the onscreen icon uses the unpretentious 'High', 'Mid' and 'Low' descriptors?

Drawing the privacy mask for your location is a pain, as you can’t see exactly what you’re doing when your comparatively large finger is blocking the screen. Reviewing video is also a bit clunky as it only displays the current day’s captures. If you want to see what happened the previous day you need to change the date and then wait for it to load.

The doorbell has been designed to conserve the battery wherever possible by only capturing video when the unit detects movement. This is a laudable design principle but as is often the case, it affects the performance; its standby mode leads to a longer connection time as it boots up. Two or three seconds is the usual connection period on other video doorbells and cameras that I have experienced, but the Reolink takes 5-10 seconds. Occasionally, it does not connect at all, which is very frustrating.

The seeds of doubt germinate as the battery also doesn't seem to last as long as the other doorbells that I have tested. The Reolink website states “the 7,000mAh built-in battery provides up to five months of protection,” although they do caveat that this conclusion is based on testing “under lab conditions with 20 triggers per day, each recording lasting eight seconds.” I'm willing to accept that the battery won’t last quite so long once I have finished my testing, but five months is, at best, optimistic.

(Image credit: Les Watson)

Reolink provides software for both Windows and OSX which is commendable; I spend most of my day at the computer and interacting with the doorbell through the phone app is less than ideal. It’s much easier to see the video output on a larger screen and the aliasing is not such an issue when the camera quality is set to high (or 'Fluent'). It goes some way toward redemption for having such limited home automation capabilities. The night vision is darker than on other doorbells which is a bit of a double-edged sword. It is sometimes difficult to see what has been captured, but on the other hand, it does not trigger unnecessarily when the security light on the house opposite lights up like other doorbells I’ve tested.

I have mixed feelings, ultimately, about the Reolink doorbell (battery). I want to believe in this product but at its price and with its software being so middling, it’s likely to be a somewhat disappointing purchase.

Should you buy the Reolink Doorbell (Battery)? Buy it if

You want a quick and easy way to add a video doorbell

If like me, you do not have an existing chime in your house, battery-powered video doorbells are a quick and easy solution.

You have other Reolink devices but their hard-wired doorbell is not suitable

The Reolink doorbell battery will work with the Reolink hub, Reolink Network Video Recorder and other Reolink security cameras.

You want a subscription-free device

Most other video doorbells either have limited storage capacities or constantly capture the video stream which fills the storage up (or both). The Reolink supports MicroSD cards up to 256GB and only captures video when movement is detected. In theory, this should mean that you will have video that goes back a long way.

Don't buy it if

You use Apple HomeKit

There are options available (like Homebridge) that can usually allow you to easily include non-Homekit devices in your Apple home via a plugin or other ecosystems like Samsung SmartThings. Reolink’s limited home automation options make that difficult.

You need to investigate every notification

The slow response will annoy and the battery will drain quickly.

You are concerned about porch security

If you live in an area where you think someone might have the bright idea to remove, steal and reset your video doorbell, avoid this easily swiped device.

Reolink Doorbell (Battery): also consider

Ring Video Doorbell Pro 2

The Ring Video Doorbell Pro 2 is a premium video doorbell that not only looks the part, but offers a wider field of view and sharp video quality. It is, unfortunately, wired only and is pricey as well, though it often goes on sale since it’s a bit older.

Read our full Ring Video Doorbell Pro 2 review

Eufy Video Doorbell 2K (Wireless)

While the Eufy Video Doorbell 2K (Wireless) doesn’t have HDR, it still has that sharp 2K resolution, not to mention it’s a little less expensive than the Philips. It also can be used without a subscription, though one is on offer. This model is wireless only.

Read our full Eufy Video Doorbell 2K (Wireless) review

How I tested the Reolink Doorbell (Battery)

• I tested the phone application and OSX application
• I tested package recognition
• I compared response times and video output to other smart video doorbells
• I attempted to add it to Google Home
• I attempted to add it to Apple HomeKit using Homebridge
• I accessed the doorbell remotely via 4G and Wi-Fi

The test environment consisted of three smart doorbells (including the Reolink) all connected to the same Wi-Fi network. All doorbells were accessed via their accompanying applications during the testing for this review. The contents of the MicroSD cards were compared for file size and capture frequency (how often the doorbell captures video). The attempts to connect to Google Home and Apple HomeKit via Homebridge were time-limited to an hour each.

The drawback of the 'only capture when detecting movement' paradigm is that it is not possible to review the whole day's video to investigate detection misfires or failures. The privacy mask seemed to work really well, for example, but conversely, maybe it was not picking up everything that it should. Still, I checked to my best ability when I knew there was outside activity and by acting out my own doorbell-ringing scenarios.

I’ve been using smart home devices for several years now, and have a whopping 30+ years of tech enthusiasm and experience under my belt. Read more about how we test.

First reviewed November 2024

• Galaxy AI is tipped to be coming to Samsung phones
• It might be introduced as part of One UI 7
• Apple Intelligence already offers a similar feature

A new rumor suggests Samsung's upcoming One UI 7 software update could add a new Galaxy AI feature that's already available as part of Apple Intelligence in iOS 18.1: notification summaries.

This comes from well-known tipster @chunvn8888 (via SamMobile), but there's not much to go off here. All that's said is Galaxy AI has had a notification summary feature added, which Samsung is calling AI notification.

The update hasn't been publicly announced, which leads us to believe it's currently being tested as part of One UI 7. We're expecting a beta version of One UI 7 to be made available to Samsung phone users before the end of the month.

If it is indeed added to the Galaxy AI suite of features, there's a good chance it'll work on a variety of different phones: we've seen Galaxy AI features make their way to phones such as the Galaxy S22 after originally launching with the Galaxy S24.

AI everywhere

Galaxy AI now has notification summary feature, it's called AI notification.November 2, 2024

The idea of notification summaries in Apple Intelligence is that AI will read all of your messages for you and pick out the most important points – saving you time as you won't have to check them all individually.

While the feature has only just been made available, it's not been an unqualified success so far. TechRadar's John-Anthony Disotto found the experience a little freaky and unnerving, and it doesn't work well for personal messages – like break-up texts.

It's perhaps for the best then that you can turn it off, or customize it on an app-by-app basis. There are perhaps certain types of apps and notifications better suited to being summarized than others.

Samsung seems to think the feature is very much worthwhile, and potentially useful for Galaxy phone owners. If it does appear as a Galaxy AI feature soon, it'll join tools such as Sketch to Image and AI-powered audio transcription.

You might also like

• Samsung Galaxy AI compatibility explained
• Galaxy AI vs Apple Intelligence
• Apple Intelligence available now in iOS 18.1

A beauty subscription box feels like a monthly present. These are our favorites.

New research from Barracuda has revealed threat actors are now using OpenAI in impersonation campaigns that target businesses across the globe.

The attack uses an email which impersonates OpenAI and sends an ‘urgent message’ to the victims recommending they update their payment information for their subscription, all through their handy direct link - a textbook phishing technique.

The operation was far reaching, with one email being sent to over 1,000 users. The first red flag was the sender's email address, which did not match the official OpenAI domain (e.g. @openai.com). Instead, it was sent from info@mta.topmarinelogistics.com.

AI powered

Worryingly, the email passed DKIM and SPF checks, meaning it was sent from a server that is authorized to send emails on behalf of the domain. The language in the email is common for phishing attacks, pressuring the user to take immediate action and creating fear and urgency.

This is far from the only AI related malicious campaign reported in the last few months. Earlier in 2024, a Microsoft report found 87% of UK organizations are more susceptible to cyberattacks thanks to the increasing use of AI tools.

That’s not to mention the rise in deep fake and convincing AI voice scams that have been targeting businesses and consumers. Already businesses around the world have lost millions to deep fake fraud, and almost half have been targeted at some point by this type of scam.

The introduction of machine learning algorithms that can uncover and leverage software flaws means that AI is leading to a dramatic increase in the number of attacks.

Despite this, research indicates that 90% of cyberattacks will still involve some element of human interaction, like with phishing attacks, so making sure everyone in your organization is trained to spot the signs of an attack is the best protection for a business.

More from TechRadar Pro

• Check out our pick of the best antivirus software
• Linus Torvalds slams AI as ‘90% marketing and 10% reality’
• Take a look at our best malware removal software choices

Watch coverage on Nov. 5 from PBS, NBC, CBS, TikTok feeds and more on your mobile device or TV.

Picking an unlimited plan for your phone isn't always as easy as it should be, so we compared the best options from AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile.

Anker 3-in-1 Cube with MagSafe review

The Anker 3-in-1 Cube with MagSafe may leave some reeling at its expensive $129.99 / £129.95 / AU$299.95 price tag. However, this brand is a reliable name that’s known for its quality products, so even a penny pincher like myself has come around to this chonky charging companion.

First of all, I loved how secure my phone felt when attached to this stand. The adjustable viewing angle came in very handy, the hinge felt strong and just stiff enough to hold my phone at the angle I wanted. It was really easy to change my phone from portrait to landscape too, making it a delightful desk companion whether I was scrolling through emails or watching YouTube.

This MagSafe charger offers 15W charging power. When tested with an iPhone 13 Pro, the Anker 3-in-1 Cube took two hours and fifteen minutes to charge it from 0%-100%, which is a fairly average charging time compared to the multitude of wireless charging stands I’ve tested.

There’s a satisfying little press-and-pull pop-out platform on the right-hand side of the cube that holds the Apple Watch charger. When in the popped-out position, the platform felt easily movable so I was concerned that the internal attachment may be a little flimsy, although it didn’t pose any problems during testing.

It took the Anker 3-in-1 Cube just an hour and fifteen minutes to charge my Apple Watch Series 9, which was only eleven minutes slower than the fastest Apple Watch charger I’ve tested to date, achieved by the impressive – albeit much larger-sized – Anker MagGo Wireless Charging Station 3-in-1 Stand. I was really pleased to discover that the rear wireless AirPod charging pad also worked great for juicing up a pair of wireless earbuds that supported the tech.

As fond as I am of this charger, I must disagree with Anker that it’s in any way “travel-ready”. Far from pocket-sized at about 2.4 x 2.4 x 2.5 inches / 60 x 60 x 63mm and weighing in at 14oz / 405g, its weight and sturdy design teamed with the non-slip base make it perfect for leaving on your desk or nightstand. But I wouldn’t say that it’s convenient for travel at all.

Overall, if you’re looking for a sturdy 3-in-1 MagSafe charger and you're happy to part with the cash, the Anker 3-in-1 Cube with MagSafe wouldn't be a bad choice. However, there are plenty of options out there if you'd rather have a more travel-friendly alternative that will charge your devices a little faster, then the ESR Qi2 3-in-1 Travel Wireless Charging Set is worth a look. Or, if these Anker or ESR chargers cost more than you'd like to spend, then the Mous MagSafe Compatible 3 In 1 Portable Charger would make a truly transportable alternative.

If you haven't yet made a decision on which charger would suit you best I recommend taking a look at our helpful guides of the best iPhone chargers and best wireless chargers for more ideas.

(Image credit: Future) Anker 3-in-1 Cube with MagSafe review: price & specs

(Image credit: Future) Should I buy the Anker 3-in-1 Cube with MagSafe? Buy it if…

You want something secure
I had no concerns when leaving my phone attached to the Anker 3-in-1 Cube. While other wireless chargers may have just as strong magnets, their general design often leaves them open to catastrophe should they get knocked. Thanks to the 3-in-1 Cube's heft and low center of gravity, I didn’t experience any problems.

You don’t want to be limited to one viewing angle
Many MagSafe wireless chargers enable you to switch between portrait and landscape configurations, but the Anker 3-in-1 Cube gives additional flexibility thanks to its hinged charging plate. It has just the right amount of resistance to hold a phone at basically any angle between the base up to 60 degrees, making it ideal for scrolling or viewing.

Don't buy it if…

You want something travel-ready
Anker may claim that the 3-in-1 Cube is travel-ready, but I simply don’t agree. While the AirPods charger hides beneath the phone charging plate, and the Apple Watch charger can be hidden away inside the cube, its chonky build and heavy weight were very noticeable whenever I tried to transport it between my home and the office.

You’re on a budget
There’s no denying it: this is one pricey phone charger and it’s perfectly understandable if the cost puts you off. But other than my niggles over the stability of the Apple Watch charging platform, it feels very robust and well-made as a whole. I’ve never used a phone charger this sturdy, and I’ve found the variable viewing angle to be a gift that keeps on giving, so it’s worth it if you’ve got the pennies for it. Otherwise, we’ve got other options that are more cost-friendly.

Anker 3-in-1 Cube with MagSafe review: also consider

ESR Qi2 3-in-1 Travel Wireless Charging Set
I'm a big fan of this ESR charging set. It delivers satisfying charging speeds and is sturdy enough to be used as an everyday charger. Granted, it isn't the most compact portable charger out there and has separate components, but it can be purchased with a travel case to make life easier.

A new era begins at Old Trafford with Ruben Amorim waiting in the wings to take over.

This secure, durable walkie-talkie is worth the seemingly exorbitant price.

JBL Quantum Stream Wireless: One-minute review

If you’re a content creator who needs a portable microphone for a convention, or even just some on-the-go video making, you really can’t go wrong with the JBL Quantum Stream Wireless. This pocket-friendly lapel mic comes with a convenient charging case, much like a pair of wireless earbuds, and works readily with your phone right out of the box. You simply insert the included Lightning or USB-C dongle and you’re ready to go.

I’ve been impressed with the performance during my testing and found that the JBL Quantum Stream Wireless delivers clear sound even in quite loud environments, especially when paired with the noise-canceling capabilities of the compatible JBL Headphones mobile app. The manufacturer touts a 24-hour battery life, with six hours from the microphone and another 18 from its charging case, and this figure was broadly accurate - giving you more than enough juice for an entire day.

Factor in a few more handy features, such as the onboard microphone mute button, and you have a very robust overall package. My one complaint would be that the included windshield, useful for outdoor recording, is a touch fiddly and can be quite hard to securely install. 

Potential buyers should also weigh up whether they actually need a lapel mic. The performance is good for a small, portable device, but you will still get superior sound quality from many of the best microphones for streaming - which would be a better choice if you want to record at home. 

(Image credit: Future) JBL Quantum Stream Wireless: Price and availability

• $99.95 / £89.99 
• USB-C and Lightning variants
• Launched in March 2024 

The JBL Quantum Stream Wireless is readily available for $99.95 / £89.99 directly from JBL and at retailers like Amazon. This might seem like a fair chunk to spend on any microphone, but means that this model sits neatly between super-budget offerings and more premium portable microphones from companies like Rode and DJI. The DJI Mic, for example, features two transmitters and a similar storage space but comes in at roughly double the price of the JBL Quantum Stream Wireless. 

JBL Quantum Stream Wireless: Specs JBL Quantum Stream Wireless: Design and features

• Portable size
• LED power indicators
• Good app

The design of the JBL Quantum Stream Wireless shares quite a lot in common with your average pair of wireless gaming earbuds. Its black carrying case is compact, with a subtle embossed JBL logo and a small row of four white LED indicators used to denote its current charge level. On the back of the case, you can find a type-C charging port, compatible with the included charging cable.

The top of the case opens up like a lid on a hinge, revealing slots for the clip-on microphone and dongle. Both are secured by magnets, though just the microphone also has two metal contacts that allow it to charge while it’s in the case. Removing the microphone gives you a good look at its design, which is mainly constructed from plastic. The front has a smooth grooved pattern, with a little JBL logo, while the back has a generously sized clip for attaching it to your clothes.

On the side of the microphone is a small button, which can be used to quickly mute it. There’s also a bright indicator LED, which is red when the microphone is disabled. Otherwise, it flashes white before turning a solid color when paired with your phone.

There’s very little to report about the dongle itself, which is rectangular and quite light and thin. It attaches to your phone via a type-C or Lightning connector depending on your model of choice, but also has its own USB port for pass-through charging. This is a great little feature and means that you don’t have to worry about not being able to charge your phone while the microphone is in use.

Most of the microphone’s core features are accessed through the JBL Headphones mobile app or JBL Quantum Engine PC software, both of which are compatible with this product. Given the clear focus on portability, I mainly relied on the app which offers the option to check battery levels, alter mic gain, enable AI noise canceling, flick between a few preset effects, and tweak power settings like LED brightness and the automatic power off.

The software isn’t anything revolutionary, but it’s got a decent selection of options and is, importantly, very responsive and well-presented.

(Image credit: Future) JBL Quantum Stream Wireless: Performance

• Effective noise cancellation
• Works well at events
• Great battery life

It’s hard to fault the performance of the JBL Quantum Stream Wireless. I mainly tested the product at events, including the busy halls of Gamescom, and found that it did a great job of cutting through the background noise to deliver perfectly understandable recordings despite its small size. 

You do notice a dip in quality when things get quite loud, with my voice often taking on a slightly robotic edge in particularly large crowds, but that was still preferable to the frankly incomprehensible recordings produced by my phone’s microphone in the same areas. This is also true of its performance outdoors, particularly with loud wind or vehicles. Expect a more natural sound when you’re out on a calm day.

It is a tad unfortunate that the included windshield is so fiddly, though. It clips on the top of the microphone via two little holes but is quite hard to align. I struggled to do it in poor lighting and was often unsure whether it was actually attached. This is not a dealbreaker, but it is worth bearing in mind if you intend to use the windshield a lot.

In terms of battery life, the JBL Quantum Stream Wireless is more than capable. I only have to charge up the case every couple of days with semi-frequent use and never had the microphone die during a recording session. Unless you want to wear it, turned on, for hours and hours at a time, you’re not going to run into any problems here.

(Image credit: Future) Should I buy the JBL Quantum Stream Wireless? Buy it if...

You want a plug-and-play solution
The JBL Quantum Stream Wireless is incredibly easy to use. You simply clip the microphone to your clothes, plug the included dongle into your phone, and you’re ready to go.

You want to create content on the go
The JBL Quantum Stream Wireless is a good option if you’re looking to take your content creation out and about, improving the quality of your audio recordings compared to your phone.

Don't buy it if...

You want a desktop microphone instead
Unless you intend to capitalize on its portability, the JBL Quantum Stream Wireless is not for you. For more general gaming or streaming, consider a standard desktop microphone instead.

You need even more features
More expensive models offer even more expansive feature sets and could be a better pick if you want a more professional recording setup.

Also consider...

If you’re not keen on the JBL Quantum Stream Wireless, you can consider these two top gaming and content-creation microphones instead.

DJI Mic 2  
If you have more to spend and want a similar set of microphones but with two receivers and compatibility with more specialist video equipment, consider the DJI Mic 2. 

For more information, check out our full DJI Mic 2 review

JBL Quantum Stream Studio
JBL also offers a robust option for content creators in the JBL Quantum Stream Studio. It’s not as portable, but it is still simple to use and offers great performance for the price. 

For more information, check out our full JBL Quantum Stream Studio review

(Image credit: Future) How I tested the JBL Quantum Stream Wireless

• Tested over a few months
• Used at various events
• Tried indoors and outdoors

I tested the JBL Quantum Stream Wireless over a period of roughly five months with an iPhone 15 Plus. During that time I took the microphone to a variety of gaming events and tested it in a wide range of conditions both indoors and outdoors. I was careful to evaluate its performance and test all of the available features in its mobile app.

I compared it to a number of desktop mics such as the Asus ROG Carynx, SteelSeries Alias, SteelSeries Alias Pro, and more.

Read more about how we test

First reviewed October 2024.