Feed aggregator

Net Nanny may be one of the oldest names in the parental control software business, but it's kept adding new features, and the latest edition includes tools you won't always see in the younger competition.

The app's web content filtering doesn't rely on simple blacklists and site categories, for instance - it uses real-time content analysis to detect issues on every web page your child tries to access. There's smarter YouTube monitoring, too, with search and viewing histories.

The company hasn't forgotten the basics, and you can also block or restrict app usage, limit screen time, and view detailed reports on your child's recent activities.

Tracking tools include the ability to view the location (and location history) of all your children on a single map. Net Nanny has added geofencing support, too, allowing you to define important locations (home, school, grandma's, whatever you need) and get alerts when a child leaves or arrives.

Read on for a detailed look into Net Nanny's offerings and whether it's the right fit for your needs.

• Interested in Net Nanny? Check out the website here

Net Nanny: Plans and pricing

(Image credit: Net Nanny)

Net Nanny's pricing is a little more complicated than usual, with three plans on offer.

The first protects a single desktop for $40 a year. This boils down to a super-affordable $3.33 per month, making it one of the cheapest parental control monitoring apps around. Sure, Mobicip does have a Lite plan that costs only $2.99 per month, but it does not come with the full range of features offered by Net Nanny.

The second covers up to five desktop or mobile devices for $55, and the third protects up to 20 devices for an annual $90.

(As we write, the company says these prices are discounted, with '30% off for a limited time.' A quick visit to the Wayback Machine showed Net Nanny offering the same prices six months ago, though, so it doesn't seem that limited. Still, it's possible the prices will be significantly higher by the time you read this.)

There are significantly cheaper apps around, though. For instance, Mobicip plans start at just $2.99/month and allow you to monitor up to five devices.Now, Net Nanny used to offer a 14-day free trial with its Android app. However, it has now done away with any free trial, and you’ll need to purchase a subscription right away to use the application. This is a bit of a letdown, since competitors like Bark offer a 7-day free trial.

Net Nanny: Supported platforms

When we last tested Net Nanny, it still supported Android devices. However, since the beginning of 2024, the provider has stated that it no longer supports Android, Kindle Fire, and Chromebook devices. As of now, Net Nanny works only on devices running Windows (10 and above), macOS 10.13 to macOS 11.x, and iOS 11 and higher.

Now, while you may still be able to operate Net Nanny on Windows and iOS devices, its macOS support is pretty outdated. For context, macOS 11 Big Sur was launched back in November 2020, with the current version being macOS 26 Tahoe, released in September 2025. This means Net Nanny’s Mac support is five major versions behind the current macOS version.

Most Mac devices bought in the last four to five years would be running at least macOS 12 Monterey, while the oldest macOS version that still receives Apple security updates is macOS 14 Sonoma. This means that Net Nanny’s macOS support sits entirely outside the range of Apple’s supported and patched operating systems, making its macOS support practically unusable.

Net Nanny: Setup

Net Nanny's setup process began when we installed the parent's app. We entered our email address and chose a password to create an account, selected the free three-day trial, and the app launched a wizard to help us begin.

This can look a little intimidating, but there's a plus in NetNanny's live chat support (Monday to Friday, 10am to 7pm EST.) It's not 24/7, but it beats many smaller companies, which often provide support via email only. It was also good to see the company send us an email with more instructions, so even if we had to give up on our current session, we'd have guidance on what to do next.

We followed Net Nanny's advice, visiting install.netnanny.com on our child's Android app, clicking a link to visit the relevant Google Play page, and installing the app.

This prompted us to log in and create our child's basic profile - name, gender and age - and then walked us through the process of approving various Android permissions (device administrator, location, content checking.) There are a lot, but they're necessary for parental control apps, where you're keeping a very close eye on how a device is being used.

Finally, Net Nanny prompted us to manually enable Safe Search in the Google app. That's good advice, but many apps do this automatically, and some do the same with other search engines (Kaspersky can enforce Safe Search with Google, Bing, Yahoo, and Yandex.)

The Safe Search setting isn't protected, either, so your child could simply disable it later. That's not automatically a disaster, as even if your child finds dubious content in a search, it should be blocked by Net Nanny's filter, but it's still a weakness in the system.

Net Nanny: Screen time

Schedule screen time and set daily limits for your child (Image credit: Net Nanny)

Net Nanny gave our test 9-year-old unlimited screen time by default, but that's easy to change. We were able to set separate usage time limits for every day of the week, and with a precise number of minutes each time (many apps support only 15 or 30-minute increments, and Mobicip schedules usage time in one-hour blocks only.)

When screen time is up, you can opt to pause the device, prevent app usage, or just block internet access. That's a handy level of control you won't get with most apps.

(Image credit: Net Nanny)

We couldn't initially find any way to schedule specific times when a device could be used, for example, to block device access from bedtime until the morning. The Help site pointed us in the right direction: for some reason, Net Nanny places time scheduling in an entirely different area of the control panel, doesn't link them, and doesn't highlight the feature later (it's the bottom option of a drop-down list.)

Once you find it, though, the scheduler works more or less as expected, allowing you to allow or deny internet access in one-hour blocks throughout the day. Many apps only support a single range ('8am to 9pm'), but Net Nanny's approach gives you far more control, for example allowing you to deny device use at mealtimes (5-6pm) and restore it for an hour or two afterward.

(Image credit: Net Nanny)Net Nanny: Content filtering

Net nanny allows you to block inappropriate websites on both mobile and desktop (Image credit: Net Nanny)

Most parental control apps filter web content using blacklists and whitelists, but Net Nanny is much smarter. Real-time text analysis looks for dubious content as it's accessed, giving the app a chance of blocking even brand new dangers. And Net Nanny even takes account of context, enabling it to tell the difference between a Wikipedia article that references drugs in a responsible and relevant way, and a site that really, really doesn't.

Net Nanny's content filtering can be customized using 14 categories: Drugs, Porn, Suicide, Weapons and more. Each category has three settings: always block, always allow, or an intermediate 'alert' (the child can access the content, but you'll be warned they've done so.)

You can also block web content by category (Image credit: Net Nanny)

You can also add custom filters that block content including a specific keyword or phrase. That gives you a lot of control but could block some worthwhile sites, as you won't fully benefit from Net Nanny's context-sensitive analysis. Adding 'suicide' or 'self-harm' might prevent access to genuinely dangerous forums, for instance, but may also block access to useful mental health resources.

If you need more control, Net Nanny supports building your own custom lists of sites it'll always allow, or always block. That's particularly handy if your child finds a blocked site she thinks should be available. Tap 'Request Access' in the child's app, the parent app raises an alert, and if it looks reasonable, you can add the site to the child's whitelist with a tap.

A bonus 'Mask Profanity' feature tries to mask swear words, replacing them with hash signs (####.) This didn't quite work 100% of the time but did much better than we expected. After we entered our favorite profanities at Google, for instance, Net Nanny masked our original search term, then hid it in all but one of our search terms, too.

Although this worked as expected, Net Nanny's child app crashed a couple of times during the review, leaving us to access whatever sites we like. That might be an issue relating to our specific device or its setup, but it's an issue we've not seen with other providers, and has to be a concern.

Net Nanny: App management

(Image credit: Net Nanny)

Net Nanny supports viewing the apps on your child's Windows device, getting alerts about newly installed apps, and blocking anything unsuitable.

There's support for blocking iOS apps, too, but only from an approved list. That's not unusual, though - iOS doesn't allow parental control apps as much power as Android - and Net Nanny's list is at least a long one, with around 125 top apps.

Whatever your platform, making this happen is easy - just scroll down the app list and tap Allow or Block as necessary. Social Media is listed as a separate category, allowing you to block all social media apps with a tap.

If that's too extreme, you can selectively block or allow individual platforms as necessary. An intermediate 'Protect' setting allows access but uses Net Nanny's content filters to block dangerous content. It's only available on a few sites, but they're all big names: Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest, TikTok, Tumblr, Twitter and YouTube.

We tried this with some custom keywords, and it delivered. If we set our filter to 'Block', Net Nanny didn't display content which contained the test keywords; if we set it to 'Alert', our test device could view the content, but we saw a warning in the Parent's dashboard.

What you don't get is any option to limit app use by time. ESET Parental Controls can set app usage to a set number of minutes, or a scheduled time of day, potentially very useful ('you can play that game, but only for 30 minutes of your three hours, and only in the evenings.')

Net Nanny: Location tracking

See where your kids are on a map on your smartphone or desktop (Image credit: Net Nanny)

Tapping Net Nanny's Location tab displays the location of your child's device on a regular Google map, with nearby stores and businesses highlighted, and we even got access to Street View when accessing our dashboard via a browser. That could be useful if you don't immediately recognize a location, or you're wondering why your child is there, and it's an improvement on the plain street-name-only maps you'll get with some parental control apps.

Net Nanny detected and displayed our location correctly, and it didn't stop with the usual pin icon, either. It also displayed our approximate address, and how long we'd been there.

By default, Net Nanny displays the current location, but a toggle at the bottom of the screen shows location history, instead. That's a useful and unusual extra, although one or two apps deliver even more (Kidslox also displays location history over a week, and adds journeys in the last 24 hours, too.)

Tapping the location marker accesses Net Nanny's basic geofencing support. You can give the location a name (Home, School), though there's no way to edit the address (ours was a few buildings out.) You're able to tell Net Nanny whether you'd like to be alerted when your child arrives at the location, leaves, or both. You can apply the same rules to everyone in your family, too, so you don't have to set them up separately.

This has some major limits. You can only use a place one of your children has visited before, for instance. There's no way to set up a zone in advance, so you're notified when they arrive somewhere they've never been before, which might be one of the key reasons for setting up geofencing in the first place.

There's no option to set zone size, either, so Net Nanny can't reliably be used as a general location monitor, for instance, to raise the alert if your child is more than a quarter of a mile from home.

Plus, location tracking only works for iPhone and not Windows or Mac devices. If you can live with those issues, though, Net Nanny's mapping features are easy to use, and its location history is a welcome plus.

Net Nanny: Monitoring

Family Feed provides activity reports for all of your children (Image credit: Net Nanny)

Net Nanny's web dashboard includes several useful monitoring tools. You can watch your child's remaining screen time count down, for instance, and look at reports of how it's been used in the past week, or month.

A Searches tab shows recent internet history searches, their time, and the device where they were used.

A YouTube panel correctly showed our YouTube searches. A 'Seen' tab should display the videos we'd watched, but it remained blank throughout the review.

There are no tools for monitoring calls and texts, or managing your child's contacts. Check out Qustodio or Boomerang if that's a problem.

You can track your child's location and general activities using Net Nanny's Family Feed (Image credit: Net Nanny)

Net Nanny scores for its reporting, though, with a Family Feed view which not only summarises recent events, it adds useful links to explain common issues, and even points you to articles with useful guidance ('GroupMe & Other Dangerous Apps Parents Should Know'). It's a great way to make sense of what's happening, especially important if you've a lot of kids generating warnings, and a welcome plus for the service.

Net Nanny: The competition

It’s not difficult to point out that Net Nanny is not yet a complete parental monitoring solution and comes with a few drawbacks, the biggest of which is the lack of a message monitoring feature. This is why apps like Bark have consistently had an edge over Net Nanny.

While Bark may be on the expensive side, with its monitoring app costing $14 per month, it comes with all the bells and whistles you require to keep a constant check on your child’s activity. For instance, it supports both Android and iOS devices, making phone and location monitoring easy.

You also get a 7-day free trial with Bark, whereas Net Nanny has done away with its 14-day trial, which is no longer offered. Plus, you can add unlimited devices at this price, whereas Net Nanny can protect a maximum of 20 devices with its highest-tier plan.

While Net Nanny is already pretty affordable, with an effective cost of just $3.33 per month, it can quickly become expensive if you’re trying to monitor more than one device. This is why you could look at options like Mobicip, which offers a Lite plan at just $2.99 per month, allowing you to manage up to five devices.

You get all the basic features, such as website blockers, screen time limits, activity reports, and the ability to remotely lock your child’s device from anywhere.

Final verdict

Net Nanny is a robust parental monitoring application, especially if you’re trying to track your child’s iPhone, Mac, or Windows devices. It offers a solid set of features, such as screen time monitoring, content filtering, and app management, all of which are easy to use and worked pretty well during our testing.

That said, it does have a few drawbacks, such as the lack of proactive geofencing and Android support. Even so, it remains on the cheaper end of the market, costing just $40 per year, which boils down to $3.33 per month. Only a few providers, such as Mobicip, are able to beat this price.

However, Net Nanny does not support the latest versions of macOS, with the last supported version being around five years old, which significantly impacts its usability. If you’re looking for Android tracking, you’ll need to consider other options such as Bark or Qustodio.

• We've also featured the best free parental control software

Although artificial intelligence (AI) continues to dominate business conversations, widespread adoption is still some way off.

In fact, just one-third of professionals said that AI programs are being scaled across their organizations.

Many companies remain hesitant to move beyond pilot projects, with a lack of trust a major barrier.

Concerns over reliability, data protection, IT security, impartiality and the potential for misuse also continue to slow adoption.

To close that gap, businesses need to understand what is behind it, how to close it and how to ensure these processes scale across the whole enterprise.

What’s behind the trust gap?

Lack of trust in AI systems continues to hold organizations back. Only 57% of AI and data teams fully trust the outputs of AI systems, and among product managers and software developers, this figure drops to just one-third. This points to a wider lack of confidence as AI becomes more embedded in day-to-day operations.

Developers’ fears are based on a variety of factors. Hallucinations, when AI models generate information that appears credible but is in fact false, mean workers are concerned about its reliability in high-stakes or sensitive use cases.

Likewise, cybersecurity, including the security of data entered into AI systems, the risk of leakage to third parties, the potential for attackers to compromise AI environments, compliance with ethical standards, and whether bias in systems could shift over time as they continue learning during live operation are all contributing to workers’ distrust of AI models.

Building trust in AI

As organizations look to build confidence in AI, quality management is becoming a bigger priority. In fact, 79% of workplace decision-makers see a direct link between trust in AI and active quality assurance measures such as regular testing, monitoring and oversight.

Trust can only be built when both AI systems and the data behind them are subject to comprehensive quality controls that are applied continuously, not just as a one-off check before deployment.

A strong foundation starts with data quality. Organizations need confidence that the information feeding AI systems is complete, up to date, and accurate. AI outputs are only as reliable as the inputs they depend on, so flawed or incomplete information will inevitably lead to poor results. Robust data governance is therefore essential to ensure AI-driven decisions to hold up in real-world use.

Quality management must also cover security, compliance and access controls. Organizations need safeguards to ensure that data does not leak from internal systems to third parties and that AI complies with regulatory requirements such as the EU AI Act and GDPR.

Clear accountability for protecting sensitive business is equally important. For example, organizations must ensure that HR records can only be accessed by authorized HR staff, with controls in place to monitor and manage how that data is used within AI environments.

At the same time, trust is not solely about reducing risk. Organizations want to ensure AI investments deliver measurable value, with more than half of companies citing improving return on investment (ROI) from Ai deployments as a key priority. This demonstrates that reliability and performance are just as important as security and governance.

Why quality management still struggles to scale

For many businesses, the challenge is no longer deciding whether to use AI, but how to manage it reliably at scale. That is proving difficult because quality management processes are still heavily reliant on manual oversight.

Quality management needs to extend across the entire AI lifecycle, from model design and training through to testing and ongoing monitoring in production.

Yet among companies that conduct regular testing, just 15% to 29% have implemented automated quality assurance processes at any AI development stage. This means that quality controls are often conducted entirely or partially manually, making them time-consuming, costly and prone to human errors.

Ultimately, this limits widespread AI adoption. Large-scale deployment is difficult to achieve when quality assurance relies heavily on manual effort, as scaling would require a significant increase in personnel.

Many organizations are also trying to manage AI adoption without clear governance, with half still lacking an enterprise-wide AI governance strategy. This is often compounded by a lack of expertise and limited understanding of how AI systems arrive at their results. At the same time, pressure to deploy AI quickly can divert resources away from testing, monitoring and oversight.

The consequences of inadequate quality management are quickly felt, particularly when AI systems interact directly with customers. Beyond the risk of regulatory fines, organizations often face dissatisfied customers, missed business opportunities, and reduced productivity when AI-generated results create more work than efficiency gains.

A stronger focus on quality pays off

As long as concerns around reliability, security and governance remain unresolved, businesses will struggle with the successful, large-scale deployment of AI. In line with this, three-quarters of decision-makers believe that more effective AI quality assurance would see their organizations experience a significant or transformative impact on user trust.

Companies must elevate AI to a new level of trust through a combination of suitable toolsets, robust governance frameworks, process expertise and technical know-how. Only by embedding these foundations can organizations deploy AI profitably and sustainably over the long term, while building the confidence necessary to scale its adoption responsibly.

We've reviewed and ranked the best small business software.

This article was produced as part of TechRadar Pro Perspectives, our channel to feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today.

The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/pro/perspectives-how-to-submit

Plus, save 40% on a pair of noise-canceling JBL earbuds and get $45 off a 6-quart Chefman air fryer.

iRobot's new five-in-one floor cleaner can disinfect your floors without using any chemicals or cleaning fluids.

A lawsuit alleges the Trump administration is divulging details of Iranian asylum seekers to the government of Iran.

(Image credit: Anna Moneymaker)

I'm not sure if Sally Wainwright fans have a name, but if they don't, it should be 'Wainwrighters'. I've been once since I was 17 and watching Last Tango in Halifax for the first time, and I've been in love with her writing, which includes Happy Valley and Gentleman Jack, ever since.

As of 2025, that took the form of Riot Women, which you can stream on BBC iPlayer. Set against a classic Wainwright Yorkshire backdrop, the show follows five menopausal women from Hebden Bridge who form a makeshift punk-rock band to enter a local talent contest.

However, it's not all fun and games like singing about menstrual cycles might seem. Though they're all from a different walk of life, each of our five women comes armed with their own drama and trauma, which soon starts to affect the others.

After ending on the tense cliffhanger of Kitty (Rosalie Craig) getting a call from her dad in prison, it's just as well that the BBC renewed Riot Women season 2 shortly after.

One year on, Wainwright and star Tamsin Grieg, who plays retired police officer Holly, tell me that they're not quite ready to start filming just yet... but that might be a blessing in disguise.

'I've now got to be two years better'

"No, no, no, no," is Grieg's immediate answer when I ask if she's feeling more confident about playing bass guitar in the band during Riot Women season 2.

"I mean an opera at the moment... so I can do anything(!). I feel a bit nervous going into the second series, because Sally has started it two years on from when the first series ended. So that is in real time, because it is two years since we stopped."

While actual plot details haven't been revealed yet, this is our first bit of insight into what to expect from the second season. After Kitty's cliffhanger, it was expected that the drama would resume from the moment her phone call ended — so who knows how many disasters have happened in the interim.

"I should have been doing my lessons for the past two years... and I haven't... so I've got a bit of catch-up," Grieg continues during our chat at the Italian Global Series. "I've got to be two years better. than I actually am. I've really got my work cut out. I've got six months to do some speed learning.

"Sally wrote to Holly as being a bit sh*t at it, so thank you. But she's not now two years on, though, is she...?" Grieg asks Wainwright, who responds, "No, she's really good now."

"F**ing hell," Grieg adds. "The annoying thing about Sally is that not only does she write all this stuff, but she goes away and learns guitar, drums, all of that. So she is doing it, and is really good at it. I think we'll just cut to your hands."

Wainwright simply replies, "It's good research," which I think tells you everything you need to know about how modest she is as a creator.

If anything, I'm hoping that the back-and-forth chaos between the two of them during our interview is indicative of what's to come when Riot Women season 2 does start filming — which, judging by Grieg's speed-learning schedule, takes us to late 2026.

Microplastics are being found everywhere, including in your home.

Apple is restoring card payments for users in India after updating its systems to comply with RBI tokenization rules.

The post Apple Reopens Card Payments in India After Four-Year Halt appeared first on TechRepublic.

Microsoft’s Point-in-Time Restore gives Windows 11 users a built-in way to roll back PCs after failed updates, driver issues, or corruption.

The post Microsoft Makes Windows 11 Point-in-Time Restore Generally Available appeared first on TechRepublic.

If you’ve spent any time researching the best parental control apps, then you will have heard of Qustodio – it’s one of the most prominent names in the sector. It’s been around for over a decade, it’s been trusted by over seven million parents, and the app’s systems have averted over three billion threats.

That’s an impressive resume and, on paper, it’s backed by an impressive slate of features, too. But can Qustodio earn your vote ahead of big rivals like Bark, Norton Family or MMGuardian?

Read on as we put Qustodio to the ultimate test, examining its features and in-use experience to see whether it delivers good value for the price it commands.

Plans and Pricing

(Image credit: Qustodio)

The Qustodio experience starts with a refreshingly straightforward look at pricing, with two paid tiers available.

The Basic package offers core functionality and costs $59.95 a year – the equivalent of just $5 per month.

With the Basic package, you get daily time limits, web filtering, location monitoring, game and app blocking and the ability to pause internet access for your children’s phones. It’s a solid core product with a more generous offer than the basic package you’ll find elsewhere.

However, I found this plan to be a tad too restrictive. For instance, Norton Family ($49.99/year) comes with everything the product has to offer, including Search Supervision and Instant Lock, which Qustodio doesn’t offer.

The Complete product, at $109.95 annually, adds AI-powered alerts, social media monitoring, custom routines, app time limits and additional monitoring, and allows parents to add unlimited devices to the account.

It’s a decent offer, especially when many premium products restrict how many devices you can monitor. Bark and MMGuardian are both pricier than Qustodio, but Norton Family is even cheaper.

There’s a free version of Qustodio, too, that offers web filtering, daily time limits, 7-day activity reports and the ability to pause the internet, but it only protects one device, so it’s understandably limited.

That said, not many parental control applications offer a free plan in the first place. Qustodio’s free plan can come in handy if you want a minimum degree of supervision over your child’s activities without being too intrusive.

Features

Qustodio offers good value, then, and it also serves up a good range of features.

It’s possible to filter out inappropriate apps, games and websites easily, and pick categories for whitelisting, alerting or total blocking. Parents can access alternative recommendations to apps that kids aren’t allowed to access, and even deploy conversation starters, approved by child psychologists, to start conversations about web browsing and internet use.

With Qustodio you can block unknown websites, automatically enable safe searches in common browsers, and receive alerts if your child searches for inappropriate content.

Qustodio offers more than 25 web filtering categories, but there’s no option within the app for kids to request access to particular websites – a feature you’ll find on Norton Family.

(Image credit: Qustodio)

Qustodio allows parents to set screen time allowances for every day of the week, and also set time limits for individual apps – and use the in-built app monitoring and detection to automatically sort over 25,000 apps into categories for easier blocking or accessing.

Besides generalized app blocking, Qustodio offers a dedicated YouTube monitoring feature that allows parents to keep an eye on the kind of videos their child has been watching on YouTube.

On iOS and Android devices, Qustodio can monitor both the app and the website. On Mac and Windows, however, the app cannot be monitored, but the YouTube website remains within its monitoring capabilities.

It’s easy to create different routines and switch between them and, if you need to step in quickly, there’s an option to pause internet access on child devices or block the device completely.

And if parents want to reward their children or be a little more lenient, it’s easy to add screen time and see a new limit once that extra time has been granted.

Different rules can be used to govern screen time use between browsers and apps, there are varying “modes” that alter access for bedtime, leisure time and study time, and custom schedules are very easy to build.

(Image credit: Qustodio)

A straightforward map allows parents to track their child’s location. Not only can you view your child’s last known location, but also a detailed location history showing all the places they have visited over the last 30 days.

While Qustodio supports geofencing, we found it to be more limited than its rivals. Qustodio allows you to set up a geofence with a maximum radius of only 200 meters, which is significantly smaller than what other applications offer. Norton Family, for instance, lets you set a maximum radius of 3,200 meters, whereas Mobicip allows a maximum radius of 1,000 meters.

(Image credit: Qustodio)

Call and SMS tracking and reading are supported on both Android and iOS, with full message details available, and parents can block phone numbers on child devices. You’ll get alerts for suspect content.

(Image credit: Qustodio)

When it comes to reporting on all of this, Qustodio is similarly comprehensive. A real-time dashboard provides easy access to each child's digital activity, including an activity timeline, screen time and browsing history, and parents can access more detailed daily or weekly reports.

(Image credit: Qustodio)

Qustodio is also forging ahead with some AI-based content, too, with AI-powered alerts that notify parents of any worrying searches, conversations or social media activity based on chosen topics or categories. That’s great, but it’s worth noting that Qustodio is a little weak on social media monitoring – it monitors messages on WhatsApp, Instagram and LINE, but that’s it.

Qustodio also offers a handy panic button on Android devices, allowing a child to send emergency alerts in times of dire need. Your child simply needs to tap the SOS button on the Kids App home screen to send alerts to all trusted contacts added to their profile.

(Image credit: Qustodio)

The best part is that even if the child’s device has been locked, they can still access the panic button from the app’s lock screen. Once the child activates the SOS bubble, a message stating that the child needs help is sent to all trusted contacts, along with the child’s location details, which are refreshed every 90 seconds.

The SOS alert can be stopped when the child taps the SOS bubble a second time. However, the trusted contacts feature goes far beyond the SOS bubble. Even when a child’s phone is locked down, they can still call these trusted contacts by tapping the emergency call button.

As usual, though, be prepared that not every feature works on every platform. You don’t get WhatsApp alerts on iOS, for instance, and there’s no location, call or SMS monitoring on Mac OS or Windows. Android is the only platform that features a panic button.

Another important feature that Qustodio misses out on is email monitoring. While you might argue that children hardly use email these days, it is still a very important feature to have because many online services and social media platforms use email for account verification, notifications, and password resets. Email is also a common channel for predatory advances, phishing scams, and inappropriate marketing targeting young teenagers.

Interface and in use

Qustodio has one of the best interfaces we’ve seen on any parental control app. As well as having a straightforward layout that places everything where you’d expect, Qustodio packs its apps and web interfaces with helpful tips and explanations about features and how they work.

A selection of Quick Actions provides fast access to common tasks, and the activity summary does a fantastic job of presenting key data in an attractive and intuitive format.

Child apps are simple enough for even the youngest children to understand what’s going on, and if you’re a parent who wants to dive deeper into the settings, you won’t get lost – the effective UI continues here.

It’s typically easy to get started, too: download the app, register an account, set up child profiles and tick all of the permissions, and you’re ready to start building schedules, monitoring devices and protecting your kids.

Customer Support

Qustodio makes a big deal about ensuring that its service is easy to use for busy parents who may not have a deep understanding of technology, and this attitude extends to its support functionality.

There are loads of helpful articles in the FAQ section, many of which have screenshots, and the guides that illustrate how to set up the app, use basic features and manage your account are particularly good.

If you need support and you use the Basic package, it’s managed through a contact form – sadly there’s no phone support, chatbot or live chat available here, but users report that they always receive helpful, polite form responses within 24 hours.

If you’re a Complete user, you get access to Care Plus. This adds phone support, personalized guidance and ongoing check-ins for parents who want more from their parental control app. And, impressively, Care Plus has an average resolution rate of 97% and an average resolution time of 15 minutes.

While it’s included for free with the Complete package, it costs $10.21/£7.99 to add it to the Basic product.

One drawback of this pricing structure is that if you’re on the Basic plan and encounter a technical issue, you’ll have to rely on automated chatbots and email support, which could take a day or two to resolve your problem. If you need immediate support, it would cost you around $13 extra, which might not be worth the additional expense.

The Competition

Qustodio has increased its prices since we last reviewed it and now falls into the same price range as many other parental control applications. There are still cheaper options available, though.

Norton Family, priced at $49.99 per year, can be a good alternative, especially if you already use Norton’s line of security products. Like Qustodio, it also lacks comprehensive social media monitoring. However, Norton allows your kids to request access to blocked sites, which Qustodio doesn’t, while also offering a wider range of website filtering rules. Unlike Qustodio, however, Norton does not support call or SMS monitoring, which can be a significant difference between the two.

Another affordable option is Mobicip, with pricing starting at just $2.99 per month, which comes to around $36 per year. However, at this price, you do not get social media monitoring or the ability to set time limits for specific applications. That said, this could be a fair trade-off if you’re looking for an affordable alternative to Qustodio.

Bark is probably Qustodio’s best competitor, although it costs around $14/month. It’s far better with social media, but is more limited on iOS and doesn’t provide a full web history.

Final Verdict

Those factors leave Qustodio looking like a particularly strong parental control option. It has superb filtering, scheduling and screen time options, AI-based additions, solid location features and excellent design, reporting and platform support.

Its customer support is great if you have the Complete product, the apps are all easy to use, and the pricing is fair, too – either competing or undercutting many rivals.

Plus, it’s one of the very few parental control applications that offers a free forever plan. Sure, it is limited and does not provide the full range of features, but it still lets you add web filters, pause internet access, and enable Safe Search on your children’s devices, along with seven-day activity reports. This is enough if you simply want to be aware of your children’s online activities without being too intrusive.

The only downside is weak social media monitoring and a relatively small geofencing zone. That social media monitoring drawback could be a dealbreaker for many families but, in almost every other area, Qustodio is a winner – it’s one of the best parental control apps on the market.

• We've also featured the best free parental control software

The open-source phenomenon OpenClaw kicked off a craze for the "personal agent", in turn sparking a massive ecosystem of specialized "claw" variations across the agentic AI developer landscape.

Questions about whether you should trust an agent with your schedule, personal information and decision making aside, Nvidia's launch of NemoClaw laid out a strong case for a similar shift for the corporate sector.

For organizations cautiously mapping out their AI roadmaps, Nvidia’s insertion into this space purports to deliver a highly credible, production-ready path forward by layering enterprise-grade reliability over raw autonomous power.

Now a few months post-launch, the dust has settled just enough to say what this means for the space, particularly what it means for the future of autonomous workflows.

OpenAI Buys ‘Lightning in a Bottle’

OpenClaw’s journey to enterprise infrastructure was a wild ride. The project originally launched in November 2025 under the moniker "ClawdBot" as a playful side project relying on Anthropic’s Claude model. Following a stern cease-and-desist letter and several quickfire rebrands, the project reemerged as OpenClaw.

It perfectly addressed the unmet market demand for action-oriented AI assistants that could persistently write code, browse the web, and chain complex tasks over days without human intervention.

It quickly became the fastest-growing open-source community in GitHub history. While big players like Meta actively expanded its own footprint by purchasing alternative agent systems like Manus AI, OpenClaw caught lightning in a bottle, culminating in creator Peter Steinberger joining OpenAI to help safely bring autonomous agents to the mainstream public.

Structuring the Enterprise Shield: What is NemoClaw?

As successful as this was for Steinburger, the real changes in the industry followed shortly after. Enter Nvidia, with its sizable chequebook and “NemoClaw,” which functions as an enterprise distribution of, or wrapper built directly on top, OpenClaw.

The stack installs via a single command and answers the important question: “Can I trust this AI agent with the kind of access I am about to give it?” The idea is to deliver the vital security architecture corporate IT departments require before deploying autonomous agents near live production systems.

Its creation and distribution proves that agentic AI needs an enterprise-grade foundation — wrapping agent frameworks with infrastructure, guardrails, and policy enforcement is becoming essential. It signals a move toward “AI operating systems” — platforms that don’t just enable intelligence, but also control how that intelligence behaves.

This is likely to become the standard model: open innovation at the edge, with structured governance layered on top.

Nvidia's Dispersed Strategy for the Agent Mesh

The AI community's reaction to NemoClaw highlights a fascinating shift in how infrastructure leaders approach market dominance. Rather than locking developers into a closed stack, Nvidia is deploying a highly flexible, dispersed strategy as NemoClaw does not require Nvidia silicon to execute.

While it is naturally optimized to leverage Nvidia's robust edge systems (and why wouldn't it be), it plays nice across the broader infrastructure ecosystem. This is exactly the sort of vertical integration play that you would expect from Nvidia with its dominance of the GPU market being so unopposed.

The Peak Appetite for AI Accountability

The corporate appetite for hard guardrails has reached an absolute fever pitch. According to a recent research report, 95% of enterprises are actively holding back from scaling their AI projects purely due to safety anxieties.

These concerns are validated by severe operational risks: unconstrained autonomous agents are notorious for "shadow AI" data exposure, introducing undetected "privilege creep" via SaaS applications, or even completely deleting, contaminating, or compromising vital database instances through unrestricted "God-mode" access.

With horror stories of loosely governed AI agents wiping out entire companies databases, guardrails arriving with the sheer commercial heft and legitimacy of Nvidia are uniquely positioned to give CISOs the peace of mind they need to finally greenlight production.

The Path Forward: Collaboration Over Conflict

Ultimately, the trajectory of OpenClaw proves that independent, boundary-pushing software can still fundamentally rewrite the computing landscape overnight. Yet, Nvidia's subsequent rollout of NemoClaw emphasizes that the industry can no longer focus purely on raw intelligence or reasoning capability.

Without rigid, predictable boundaries, autonomous agency is simply an unmanageable corporate liability.

The true agentic renaissance depends entirely on collaborative, cross-industry guardrails. By actively fostering initiatives like the Nemotron Coalition — which unites rivals like Mistral AI and Perplexity to co-develop secure base models — the tech sector is showing it can build a future where AI capability and AI accountability finally move in perfect lockstep.

We list the best small business software.

This article was produced as part of TechRadar Pro Perspectives, our channel to feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today.

The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/pro/perspectives-how-to-submit

Microsoft is cutting thousands of jobs in a major Xbox restructuring as the company narrows its gaming strategy and continues heavy AI spending.

The post Microsoft Guts Xbox in Biggest Shake-Up Yet, Cuts 4,800 Jobs Companywide appeared first on TechRepublic.

We're halfway though 2026, and this year has already delivered some of the best soundbars we've seen — or rather, heard. The standout amongst the models we've tested is the "phenomenal" Samsung HW-Q990H — one of a select group of 5-star products, thanks to its "powerful, engaging and detailed sound profile", straightforward setup and strong connectivity options. Another winner was the LG Sound Suite Immersive Suite 7 Pro. If you're yearning for some "phenomenal rumbling bass", this is the soundbar for you.

Those are both premium picks, but we also reviewed a couple of brilliant budget options. The Klipsch Flexus Core 100 comes in at a fraction of the price of that Samsung model, and while its soundscape is understandably less expansive, it still impressed us by delivering clear dialogue, strong bass, and a useful, responsive display.

The rather utilitarian-looking Zvox AccuVoice AV855 also stood out from the pack; this bar is especially designed to make dialogue easier to hear. It's built especially for those with hearing impairments, but will appeal to anyone who's sick of having to turn on the subtitles on just to understand what's happening.

Scroll down to see all my picks. Hit the 'View details' button for a summary of what we thought about each one, plus a link to our full review.

Super soundbars

Samsung HW-Q990H

Read our full review

LG Sound Suite Immersive Suite 7 Pro

Read our full review

ZVOX AccuVoice AV855

Read our full review

Pros

• Extreme dialog boosting
• Plenty of fine-tuning via the remote
• Good port selection
• Can get loud

Cons

• Default audio sounds a bit mid-rangey / boxy
• Spatial Audio is too subtle
• No Bluetooth or Wi-Fi music streaming

Bluesound Pulse Cinema Mini

Read our full review

Klipsch Flexus Core 100

Read our full review

LG Sound Suite H7

Read our full review

Yamaha True X Surround 90A

Read our full review

Portable power stations have become one of the smartest purchases for campers, road trippers, and anyone wanting reliable backup power at home.

The Anker Solix C300X Portable Power Station is currently on sale for $330 (was $390) at Best Buy. It comes with a foldable 60W solar panel, giving you everything you need to recharge away from the grid.

And when I say portable, I really mean it. I think of this as the middle-ground between a heavy-duty power bank and a full-sized power station. Its compact size and impressive feature set make it an excellent choice for the summer.

Today's top portable power station deal

This compact portable power station combines a 288Wh lithium iron phosphate battery with a foldable 60W solar panel, multiple charging ports, 300W output, and lightweight portability for camping, travel, and emergency backup power.View Deal

The built-in 288Wh lithium iron phosphate battery delivers 300W of continuous power, with Anker's SurgePad technology supporting peaks of up to 600W for devices that need extra power when starting up.

That's enough to keep phones, laptops, cameras, drones, lights, portable coolers, and many other everyday essentials running when you're away from mains electricity.

One of the biggest advantages of this bundle is the included 60W solar panel. Its foldable, book-style design makes it easy to carry, while solar charging lets you top up the battery wherever the sun is shining.

Anker says the bundle can recharge to 80% in around 2.5 hours under suitable solar conditions.

The power station offers eight output ports, including three AC outlets, three USB-C ports, one USB-A port, and a 12V DC output, making it easy to charge several devices at the same time without needing extra adapters.

Despite everything packed inside, the unit weighs just 9.1 pounds, so it's easy to carry between your car, campsite, cabin, or home. The lithium iron phosphate battery is rated for 3,000 charge cycles, offering years of dependable use.

Backed by a generous five-year warranty, the Anker Solix C300X is a practical portable power solution for outdoor adventures and emergency backup alike.

While you're here, take a look at our roundup of the best portable power stations.

• See all power stations and power banks at Best Buy

The strain of the virus that's responsible for the current outbreak has no specific treatments or preventive measures. Three new clinical trials could provide possible breakthroughs.

(Image credit: Daniel Buuma)

Chinese robotics firm Agibot has launched a range of humanoid robots designed to look, move, and sound like human beings in the UK business-to-business (B2B) market.

The Shanghai-based company, founded in 2023 by two former Huawei engineers, hosted a launch event in London on June 30, 2026, with several of its A3 full-sized humanoid and X2 half-size humanoid robots in attendance, as well as current and prospective business partners.

An Agibot X3 cutting some serious shapes (it doesn't do 'the robot' though) (Image credit: Jamie Richards / Future)

The robots — all controlled by humans with smartphones and DualSense controllers — were deployed at several demo stations in the event space.

One X2 humanoid robot was set up to dance to peppy music, cutting some serious shapes for a constant crowd, while another in a Harry Kane shirt kicked a football into a net. A third wore a suit of (admittedly very cool) Gundam-style armor, demonstrating the robots’ potential for customization.

This Gundam-style armor was designed to show the X2 robot's customization potential (Image credit: Jamie Richards / Future)

As for the full-sized A3 humanoid — less expressive than its smaller sibling, with sharper angles and a rather blank circle in place of the X2’s animated ‘eyes’ — a unit was made available to greet guests and for photo opportunities.

In a presentation at the UK launch event, Agibot co-founder and COO Daniel Jiang said: “The robot business is the AI business. Robots should understand you, know what you say, talk to you, and work for you.”

Indeed, at the launch event, the word ‘robot’ was as common as the phrase ‘embodied AI’, as Agibot representatives attempted to position the firm’s product range as a signifier of a new technological era: the ‘fourth industrial revolution.’

The Agibot X2 was the clear star of the show, and by far the firm's best-represented product (Image credit: Jamie Richards / Future)

In a later talk, co-founder and R&D president Yan Xiong said: “Of the products I’ve worked on, embodied AI is the most exciting and inspiring. Through three intelligences in one body, robots can become human-like.”

The three intelligences in question control interaction, locomotion, and manipulation, powered by on-device AI models that communicate with cloud servers. It seems that Agibot sees itself as an AI company first and foremost, and is allocating its resources in kind: “Our main focus is the research and development of the three intelligences, taking up 75% of our R&D staff, and 80 per cent of our R&D budget.”

The Agibot A3 was demoed on-stage as the firm's flagship product (Image credit: Jamie Richards / Future)

That’s not to say that the firm's humanoid robots aren’t profoundly impressive. The units are made mainly of magnesium alloy, with titanium reinforcements at pressure points to ensure rigidity. The A3 weighs 55kg, which is pretty reasonable when you consider its 5-foot-8-inch (173cm) height, and lasts up to 10 hours on a single charge of its 1152W battery.

In comparison, the 4-foot-3-inch (131cm) X2 weighs 39kg and lasts for two hours. The units communicate with the internet via dual-module, dual-SIM 5G.

Also present were units from Agibot's D1 quadruped range, inexplicably programmed to do backflips on command, as well as G2-series industrial robots and C5 cleaning robots. The top-tier D1 model, the D1 MaxPro, has a carrying capacity of 50kg, while only weighing 68kg itself.

Don't call them dogs: Agibot never described its D1-series robots in canine terms (Image credit: Jamie Richards Future)

Agibot is young but quickly increasing its production capacity. It recently rolled out its 15,000th unit, having passed 10,000 units just three months earlier, and has already deployed its G2 industrial robots in China’s Longcheer electronics factory. Indeed, much of the event was dedicated to promoting possible use cases for each model in industries like construction, live entertainment, and the corporate world.

Having shaken hands with the X2 and watched the D1 wave its ‘paw’ and, again, perform several perfect backflips, I have to admit that I’m still stunned by Agibot's range of robots. The firm’s launch has done nothing to allay my many concerns about AI, but it’s still almost unbelievable to see actual droids walking around.

It’s clear that Agibot wants its robots to be relatable — the dance moves, handshakes, and free kicks are obviously an effort to instill some kind of affection in a crowd of possible customers. I’d be lying if I said I didn’t find the X2 wildly entertaining, even though I know it's just metal and plastic — but that’s the power of pattern recognition.

The Agibot X2 has nothing of its own to say yet, but with further development towards autonomy, that could soon change (Image credit: Jamie Richards / Future)

If Agibot can make strides towards its professed goal of autonomous operation, then we really aren’t too far away from having a real-life C3PO on our hands.

It’s early days, but the firm’s leadership sounds committed. In his presentation, Yan Xiong said: “Scaling to mass production is the first hurdle to mature the embodied AI industry. After we achieve mass production, the next step is to bring our portfolio to commercial availability."

“AI should not be confined behind screens,” he later added, “it must be brought into the physical world.”

If you're heading to college this fall, don't make the mistake of buying a laptop that's only good for taking notes and browsing the web. Courses increasingly rely on AI tools, creative software, and demanding applications, so you should invest in something far more powerful than a Chromebook.

Right now, the MSI Katana 15 HX is down to $1134 (was $1319) at Amazon, saving you $185. That's an excellent price for a laptop featuring an Intel Core i7-14650HX processor, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 graphics, 16GB of DDR5 memory, and a spacious 1TB NVMe SSD.

The MSI Katana 15 HX laptop combines workstation-class hardware with a high-resolution display, making it an excellent choice for students who want a laptop capable of handling demanding workloads alongside everyday coursework.

Today's top laptop deal

Powered by an Intel Core i7 processor and Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 graphics, this laptop pairs a color-accurate 15.6-inch QHD 165Hz display with 16GB DDR5 memory and a 1TB SSD for demanding creative workloads.View Deal

A portable powerhouse

In our review we said the laptop was a "great option" that "balances design and performance with a relatively affordable price."

At the heart of the system is Intel's 14th Gen Core i7-14650HX processor, paired with Nvidia's GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop GPU based on the Blackwell architecture.

Together they deliver the performance needed for AI workloads, video editing, 3D rendering, CAD software, photography, and other demanding creative applications.

The 16GB of DDR5 memory keeps multitasking smooth, while the 1TB NVMe SSD provides plenty of room for large projects, applications, and media libraries.

Support for ray tracing and DLSS 4 also helps boost supported professional workflows and GPU-intensive tasks.

The 15.6-inch QHD display offers a sharp 2560 x 1440 resolution with a fast 165Hz refresh rate, making scrolling, animation, and video playback feel silky smooth.

With 100% DCI-P3 color coverage, it's also well suited to photo editing, video production, and other color-sensitive work.

Keeping everything running efficiently is MSI's Cooler Boost 5 cooling system, which combines dual fans with multiple heat pipes to help maintain stable performance during extended workloads.

A customizable four-zone RGB keyboard, highlighted WASD keys, and a full numeric keypad make it equally comfortable for productivity and creative work.

It comes with Wi-Fi 6E, USB-C with DisplayPort and Power Delivery, HDMI output supporting up to 8K displays, USB-A ports, and Gigabit Ethernet, making it easy to connect high-resolution monitors, fast external storage, and other peripherals.

MSI AI Engine and Windows Copilot also help optimize performance for different workloads.

With a powerful processor, one of Nvidia's newest laptop GPUs, a color-accurate QHD display, plenty of fast memory, and a spacious SSD, this is an excellent laptop deal for students, creative professionals, and anyone looking for desktop-class performance in a portable package.

For further choices, look at our round up of the best student laptops and best business laptops you can buy.

Also consider: More RTX laptops for students

Available at Walmart, this 18-inch Asus powerhouse combines an AMD Ryzen 9 processor, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 graphics, 32GB DDR5 memory, a 1TB SSD, and a stunning 240Hz Nebula display for demanding creative and professional workloads.View Deal

Also available at Walmart, this Lenovo laptop pairs an Intel Core i7-14700HX processor with Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 graphics, 16GB RAM, a 1TB SSD, and a color-rich 165Hz OLED display.View Deal

Available at Best Buy, HP's 16-inch laptop combines an AMD Ryzen 9 processor, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 graphics, 16GB of memory, a 1TB SSD, and a vibrant 2.5K 165Hz OLED display for demanding creative workloads.View Deal

• See all student laptops at Amazon

• A Reddit user manually upgraded their MacBook’s storage chips
• The process involved soldering, 12 hours and ‘some nerves’
• The move saved them $2,200 after Apple recently increased its prices

How much is too much to pay for laptop storage? After Apple’s shocking price rises, things might feel so bad that you’re tempted to roll up your sleeves and perform an emergency DIY upgrade job on your MacBook. That’s exactly what one Apple fan did — and they saved themselves a cool $2,200 in the process.

Posting on Reddit, user arduinoRPi4 explained how they took their MacBook Pro with 2TB of storage and boosted it all the way to 8TB, quadrupling their available storage with a serious improvement that means they can “store anything I want.” They spent “around $800” on parts, which saved them $2,200 (around £1,650 / AU$3,170) compared the exorbitant $3,000 (about £2,240 / AU$4,320) it would have cost to pay Apple for a similar upgrade.

Of course, this being Apple, opening a MacBook Pro and increasing its storage yourself is far from straightforward. The post revealed that it took them 12 hours “and some nerves” to make the change — and no wonder, as doing so requires removing the existing storage modules from the MacBook Pro’s mainboard and soldering alternative chips in their place.

As well as that, the poster indicated that they had to “fill in the power components on the other side as well” in order to complete the upgrade. “That was really hell,” they admitted, adding that these parts “are TINY packages.”

All the work was done while they were on vacation in Shenzhen, China, where they “borrowed a lab from a friend who does component level repair.” They used a hot air station and microscope soldering and stencils to do the work, which involved soldering power management integrated circuits into place, followed by 4TB of NAND storage chips on each side of the laptop for a total of 8TB.

‘It looks like excellent work’arduinoRPi4 on RedditarduinoRPi4 on Reddit

If you’ve got the resolve, patience and skill for a spot of laptop surgery like this, the savings can be enormous. A 14-inch MacBook Pro with M5 Max chip and 2TB of storage will set you back $4,099 / £4,099 / AU$6,399 at Apple’s increased prices. Change the storage to 8TB and that tweak will add a hefty $3,000 to your bill, bringing the total to an eye-watering $7,099 / £7,099 / AU$10,899.

The difference is even starker when you apply this change to Apple’s entry-level MacBook Pro. A 14-inch MacBook Pro with M5 chip and 2TB of storage currently costs $2,499 / £2,499 / AU$3,949. Add 8TB of storage and the total shoots up by a colossal $4,600. That’s partly due to the expensive storage addition and partly because it requires changing the M5 chip to an M5 Max, which is the only chip that can be configured with 8TB of storage.

A $3,000 upgrade is well out of reach for most MacBook buyers (much less a $4,600 one), so it should perhaps be unsurprising that an enterprising user with plenty of experience and a little time on their hands felt motivated to manually upgrade their storage.

Most posters in the thread were highly impressed with their work, with comments like “very impressive, I could never” being typical. One user was especially effusive in their praise, saying “This kind of work blows my mind.”

That said, other users weren’t happy that a task like this is even needed at all. “Crazy that you have to go this level of modifying just to upgrade your storage,” said one, indicating that Apple’s increased storage prices are not exactly the most popular move it’s ever made.

But with the artificial intelligence (AI) goldrush pushing up component prices worldwide and Apple unwilling to compromise its famously high margins, increased costs are here to stay, at least for the time being. And while that’s still the case, there will probably be plenty more people willing to take on the considerable task of upgrading their laptop’s storage with a few off-the-shelf components and a soldering iron to hand.

• Marshall unveils Acton IV and Stanmore IV speakers
• Redesigned bass port, repositioned cables and tweaked speaker array
• Sadly, there's no Woburn IV in sight yet

It's been four years since Marshall revamped its home speaker line-up, and so fourth-generation models of the Marshall Stanmore, Marshall Acton and Marshall Woburn are certainly due.

In the words of Meat Loaf, two out of three ain't bad, because the former amp company (which now seems to focus solely on consumer tech) has just unveiled the brand-new Acton IV and Stanmore IV speakers.

These two new speakers are on sale now, and because we're keen we've already got a Marshall Acton IV review hot off the press for you — ie. the slightly smaller and cheaper of the two. It costs $299.99 / £259.99 (AU$430), while the Stanmore IV is a little more expensive at $399.99 / £349.99 (about AU$700).

And what about the top-end member of the family, the Woburn? There doesn't seem to be a new-generation version of this model. Perhaps it was stuck in traffic on the M1?

(To explain that joke for those outside the UK, Stanmore and Acton are both boroughs in London, while Woburn is a town outside of it. The M1 is the freeway passing it, and congestion jokes are a stalwart part of British humor. Feel free to trot this one out down at the local bar/ watering hole; I don't need any credit).

Fourth-gen upgrades abound

(Image credit: Future)

The Acton and Stanmore IV both bring a few improvements over the third-gen models.

These include support for Auracast, upgraded tweeters for a sparkling high-end, a redesigned bass port for increased airflow, and cables which plug into the bottom of the speaker instead of the side.

This latter was an interesting move, and it was done to allow the speakers to be backed right up against the wall. In theory, then, they'll fit into a cabinet or cupboard much better.

Beyond that, you're largely getting a package that'll be familiar to Marshall fans, especially with the amp-esque design and style. They're both still compatible with the brand's control app, as well as the M-button for controls, and retain the various connection options including Bluetooth, RCA and aux.

In previous reviews of Marshall's home speakers, we praised the bass performance and audio detail (thanks to a previous bass port redesign), but wished they could stream music over Wi-Fi, or offered voice assistance. Sadly, these particular perks have not been added for the new models — but we can still hope that they might arrive with the Woburn, right?

Say goodbye to recurring fees and complicated systems with FileJump’s straightforward and secure cloud storage platform — with lifetime access to your files.

The post Your Data, Always Within Reach – 2TB of Lifetime Cloud Storage Is $59 appeared first on TechRepublic.