Feed aggregator

• An annoyed Samsung user has started a petition to restore Bluetooth to the S Pen
• Samsung removed connectivity with the S25 Ultra, disabling remote camera control and gestures
• The petition has over 3,000 signatures so far

An annoyed Samsung specialist has started a petition on Change.org to “demand Samsung Mobile to reintroduce [the] Bluetooth S Pen for Galaxy S26 Ultra”, after Samsung removed Bluetooth capabilities from the new Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra’s stylus.

Jeff Springer, who owns and runs the specialist Samsung news site SammyGuru, has launched a Change.org petition in response to Samsung’s decision to remove Bluetooth from the S25 Ultra’s S Pen, which previously enabled remote control of the UI and camera.

The petition has already gained some traction, with more than 3,200 signatures at the time of writing.

In the petition’s description, Springer writes of his annoyance at Samsung’s decision: “For me, and for numerous others, this feature was not just a novelty – it was a functional, important tool that differentiated the Samsung Galaxy from other smartphones on the market [...] We implore Samsung Mobile to listen to their user base and incorporate beneficial feedback into their product development process.”

As we previously reported, it did seem that Samsung would be changing course on the S Pen decision. A footnote in an official Samsung blog suggested the company would be selling Bluetooth-enabled S Pens separately, but this turned out to be a mistake.

Change.org petitions have no legal or official impact in any territory, but can be useful tools in putting pressure on organizations and companies to change course.

Bluetooth S Pens – a cause worth fighting for?

The S25 retains the iconic S Pen, but only as a writing and drawing tool (Image credit: Peter Hoffmann)

A central reason that Bluetooth was cut from the S25 Ultra’s S Pen is, according to Samsung, a lack of popularity with the user base, which suggests most users won’t miss the feature.

However, it's undeniably disappointing to see Samsung’s highest-tier phone losing features – as our Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra review finds, this is otherwise the absolute apex of Samsung’s smartphone production powers, so any perceived dent in that image can feel like a real blow. From that perspective, I can genuinely sympathize with Springer and the petition’s other signatories.

However, if the Bluetooth capabilities of the S Pen really were unpopular, then it may have been worthwhile to cut this lesser-used capability in order to reallocate resources to the new 50-megapixel ultra-wide camera and class-leading Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, which the wider user base will get far more use out of.

In any case, while the lack of S Pen connectivity may keep the S25 Ultra out of the hands of these 3,200 petitioners, it’s unlikely to stop Samsung’s latest premium flagship from taking a spot on our list of the best Samsung phones, best camera phones, and best phones overall.

You might also like

• The Nothing Phone 3a series is confirmed for March 4, and a photo and specs rumor gives us an idea of what to expect
• iOS 18.3: key upgrades and bug fixes for Visual Intelligence, Apple Music, and more
• Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra cameras: every sensor and lens

• Max is debuting a new multiview feature for the first time
• The experience will be limited to NASCAR but puts you in the driver seat
• It will be available for all major races this season

Max subscribers, start your engines. Just a few days after moving the main navigation menu from the top to the left side panel of its homepage, the streaming service is making another move – its first-ever multiview experience. Meaning that for one program, you’ll have four separate views.

Max's first multiview experience is being dubbed NASCAR Driver Cam, and it should be a significant win for racing fans. It’ll debut with the Cook Out Clash at Bowman Gray on February 2, 2025, so just in a few short days, and will let you get the view from every driver in the race.

The idea is that your stream will be split into four different views, allowing you to see from inside four different driver's cars, along with core stats like speed, gear, RPM, and the position and location of the course. Considering there will be up to 40 drivers to choose from, Max will help you with any indecision by offering two multiview presets, but you can also pick a single driver, and watch that view in full, individually.

(Image credit: Max)

You’ll also get individual controls for each driver cam, allowing you to pause, rewind, snap back to live, and hear the individual team audio. Max notes the view will be 1080p for the driver cams with a custom audio mix pairing car noise with team radios.

It’s certainly a unique view, and it was previously unavailable unless the TV production decided to cut to it. Max, TNT Sports, and NASCAR are putting more of the control in your hands, and if you’re a racing fan, this is pretty darn exciting.

Further, it’s not just for the Cook Out Clash. Max will offer NASCAR Driver Cam for the 38 race weeks as part of the Sprint Cup Series, meaning you can use this view for the playoffs, tournaments, and the Daytona 500. For each of these, there will be preset views as well as fan-selected ones – pretty neat.

It’s a pretty impressive tech feat that Max is pulling off. While they are not the first streamer to offer multi-view, there is a lot of customization here. Considering that Max is spinning this up for NASCAR and that there are other sports courtesy of TNT Sports on the platform, we could see this rollout replicated in the future.

(Image credit: Max)

I hope that Max will, at minimum, allow you to create your own multiview setup and pick the four views you want rather than preset or fan-selected ones based on the most popular driver cams.

Could it be a potential play for TV shows or movies? That’s a bit harder to tell, for instance, viewing four different episodes of a show like Curb Your Enthusiasm or House of the Dragon might be jarring, but what if there are more immersive views, or you can decide the cut or what you’re looking at? It’s an interesting thought, kind of like choosing your own adventure, but Max hasn’t committed to anything like this.

For now, Max is ushering in multiview for NASCAR, and from the shared images, it looks like a pretty compelling experience that will put fans closer to the racers they want to win and, ultimately, closer to the action.

Further, it doesn’t come with a price increase … as of yet, I just hope they don’t copy Netflix in the future. Check out our list of the best shows and movies to watch on Max here.

You might also like

• Max just made a big change, and your streaming life will probably get easier
• There are two new ways to stream Apple's MLS Season Pass this year, plus more content to take in and a new way to get it for free
• Everything new on Max in February 2025

• BioWare is being downsized as it focuses its attention on Mass Effect 5
• General manager Gary McKay says "We don’t require support from the full studio"
• Many long-time Dragon Age developers have been laid off

EA has announced it is restructuring BioWare as it shifts its full attention to Mass Effect 5.

In a blog post published on January 29, Bioware general manager Gary McKay explained that it will be downsizing the studio and moving an unspecified number of developers to other teams within EA, while others will be focused entirely on the next Mass Effect game.

"Now that Dragon Age: The Veilguard has been released, a core team at BioWare is developing the next Mass Effect game under the leadership of veterans from the original trilogy, including Mike Gamble, Preston Watamaniuk, Derek Watts, Parrish Ley, and others," McKay said.

"In keeping with our fierce commitment to innovating during the development and delivery of Mass Effect, we have challenged ourselves to think deeply about delivering the best experience to our fans. We are taking this opportunity between full development cycles to reimagine how we work at BioWare."

McKay continued, saying, "Given this stage of development, we don’t require support from the full studio. We have incredible talent here at BioWare, and so we have worked diligently over the past few months to match many of our colleagues with other teams at EA that had open roles that were a strong fit."

Amid the downsizing, it also appears that several, long-time BioWare veterans have also been laid off, with IGN reporting that "a smaller number" of Dragon Age team members had seen their roles terminated, and been given time to apply for new positions within the company if they choose.

Over on BlueSky, narrative designer Trick Weekes shared that they are now looking for a new position after working 20 years at BioWare. Weekes served as a writer on Mass Effect and Mass Effect 2, then later as a senior writer for Mass Effect 3 and many of the series' downloadable content (DLC).

They also wrote for Dragon Age: Inquisition and, most recently, worked as the lead writer on Dragon Age: The Veilguard.

"I'm now looking for a new writing/narrative position," Weekes said. "It's been a privilege to work with so many amazing devs over my 20 years at BioWare, and I will cherish the memories of the wonderful folks in the community I've met along the way. Thank you all."

Editor, Karin West-Weekes, also announced that she is looking for work, as well as narrative designer Ryan Cormier, producer Jen Cheverie, and more.

"Today’s news will see BioWare become a more agile, focused studio that produces unforgettable RPGs. We appreciate your support as we build a new future for BioWare," McKay added.

You might also like...

• Best RPGs 2025 - top role-playing games for PC and consoles
• A former BioWare dev seems optimistic about the next Mass Effect, stating it might be the first time the dev 'is able to singularly focus on a single project'
• PSN accounts will now be optional for some PlayStation games on PC, but there will be 'incentives' for users who link them

Lawmakers have expressed concerns about congestion in at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport amid a constricted space.

(Image credit: Andrew Harnik)

• Microsoft has announced that DeepSeek R1 is coming to Copilot+ machines
• It'll run on-device, so will be less powerful than other versions of the model
• DeepSeek R1 will have three Copilot+ versions that will roll out over time

DeepSeek has seriously shaken up the AI world with an LLM that is seemingly cheaper to train, more power-efficient, and yet equally intelligent compared to its rivals. While Meta, Google, Open AI and others scramble to decipher how DeepSeek’s R1 model got so impressive out of nowhere – with OpenAI even claiming it copied ChatGPT to get there – Microsoft is taking the ‘if you can’t beat them, join them’ approach instead.

Microsoft has announced that, following the arrival of DeepSeek R1 on Azure AI Foundry, you'll soon be able to run an NPU-optimized version of DeepSeek’s AI on your Copilot+ PC. This feature will roll out first to Qualcomm Snapdragon X machines, followed by Intel Core Ultra 200V laptops, and AMD AI chipsets.

It’ll start by making the DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B available on Microsoft AI Tookit for developers, before later unlocking the more powerful 7B and 14B versions. While these aren’t as impressive as the 32B and 70B variants also at its disposal, the 14B and lower versions of DeepSeek can run on-device.

This mitigates one of the main concerns with DeepSeek – that data shared with the AI could end up on unsecured foreign servers – with Microsoft adding that “DeepSeek R1 has undergone rigorous red teaming and safety evaluations” to further reduce possible security risks.

How to get DeepSeek R1 on Copilot+

(Image credit: Microsoft)

To start using DeepSeek’s on-device Copilot+ build once its available, you’ll need an Azure account – you can sign up on Microsoft's official website if you don't already have one. Your next step will be to boot up Azure AI Foundry and search for DeepSeek R1. Then hit 'Check out model' on the Introducing DeepSeek R1 card, before clicking on 'Deploy' then 'Deploy' again in the window that pops up.

After a few moments the Chat Playground option should open up, and you can start chatting away with DeepSeek on-device.

If you haven’t yet used DeepSeek, two big advantages you’ll find when you install it are that it’s currently free (at least for now), and that it shows you its ‘thinking’ as it develops its responses. Other AI, like ChatGPT, go through the same thought process but they don’t show it to you, meaning you have to refine your prompts through a process of trial and error until you get what you want. Because you can see its process, and where it might have gone off on the wrong track, you can more easily and precisely tweak your DeepSeek prompts to achieve your goals.

As 7B and 14B variants unlock, you should see DeepSeek R1’s Azure model improve, though if you want to test it out you might want to do so sooner rather than later. Given Microsoft’s serious partnership with OpenAI, we expect it won’t treat this emerging rival well if it turns out that DeepSeek was indeed copied from ChatGPT – potentially removing it from Azure, which it may not have a choice about if the AI faces a ban in the US, Italy and other regions.

You may also like

• New DeepSeek AI rival claims to be more powerful than both V3
• I created a Windows 11 virtual machine to test DeepSeek safely – here's how you can do it for free
• Is DeepSeek AI safe to use? Think twice before you download DeepSeek for the time being

DeepSeek has reportedly disappeared from Italy's Apple App Store and Google Play Store, with the disappearance starting on Wednesday, January 29, 2025.

The block came a day after the country's data watchdog, the Garante, filed a privacy complaint asking for clarification on how the ChatGPT rival handles users' personal data.

Italian iPhone and Android users have confirmed to TechRadar the new AI chatbot isn't available in the app stores to download (see image below).

The DeepSeek website remains available across the country for now. Italians can also still use their DeepSeek app if they had already downloaded it before the block came into force.

The screenshots have been taken on both Italy's Apple (on the left) and Google (on the right) official app stores on January 30, 2025. (Image credit: Future)

At the time of writing, no official explanations about Italy's DeepSeek block have been shared.

"I don't know if it's bound to us or not, we asked for some information. The company has now 20 days to reply," Pasquale Stanzione, head of Italy's data watchdog, said to Italian news agency ANSA.

What's certain is that Italy isn't the only European country going after the new Chinese AI chatbot over privacy concerns. Belgium and Ireland also filed similar complaints, fearing that Deepseek's privacy policy may be in breach of GDPR rules.

Can a VPN help bypassing DeepSeek block?

Despite the best VPN services being known to help users bypass online restrictions, Italians may require some extra workarounds. Like the US TikTok ban, a VPN isn't a one-click solution for the DeepSeek withdrawal.

That's mainly because using a VPN doesn't spoof your App Store location. This means that you'll need to "find another way of downloading the app other than the Apple App or Google Play stores," explains Eamonn Maguire, Head of Account Security at Proton – the provider behind Proton VPN.

Do you know?

(Image credit: Shutterstock)

A virtual private network (VPN) is security software that encrypts your internet connections to prevent third-party snooping while spoofing your real IP address location. Th latter skill is what you need to bypass online geo-restrictions.

Surely not impossible, however, experts suggest nonetheless doing this with caution.

"This week's news around data privacy issues and leaked databases are concerning. When coupled with the company's potential links to the Chinese government, this is even more worrying," Maguire told TechRadar.

While DeepSeek's privacy policy might look very similar to those of OpenAI-developed ChatGPT, Euroconsumers – a coalition of five national consumer protection organizations, which includes Italy and Belgium – found "multiple violations of European and national data protection regulations."

Moreover, as per the provider's own wording, users' personal information is stored "in secure servers located in the People's Republic of China" and will be used to "comply with our legal obligations, or as necessary to perform tasks in the public interest, or to protect the vital interests of our users and other people."

All in all, Maguire said: "We recommend users act with caution when using AI tools linked to China, particularly when sharing sensitive business or personal information."

The Red Devils travel to Romania looking to tie up automatic qualification for the last 16.

Spurs look to put their dismal Premier League form to one side as they host the Swedish outfit.

• Wacom has started notifying customers about a security incident
• Threat actors managed to steal payment information from an undisclosed number of people
• The attack has been addressed, Wacom says

Design hardware firm Wacom has warned its customers that it may have lost their personal data, including payment information.

A report from The Register says the company believes the attack took place between November 28 2024, and January 8, 2025, and it is currently notifying affected individuals.

In the email notification letter, Wacom notes, "The issue that contributed to the incident has been addressed and is effectively being investigated. However, we are now writing only to customers who might have been potentially affected by this."

A credit card skimmer?

Those that don’t get an official Wacom communication should consider themselves safe for now. Those that get the email should definitely start monitoring their credit card statements, and possibly even consider placing a fraud alert on their credit cards.

Wacom did not detail the attack at this point. Therefore, we don’t know who the attackers are, how they managed to infiltrate the company’s web shop, or how many people are affected.

While still in the domain of speculation, The Register believes a credit card skimmer code might have been involved, especially since Wacom’s web shop is powered by Magento.

Magento is a wildly popular open-source ecommerce platform, and as such is a frequent target. For example, in late July 2024, researchers reported on a creative technique involving so-called swap files being used to deploy persistent credit card skimmers on Magento sites. Earlier still, in April, cybersecurity researchers found a critical vulnerability in Magento allowing threat actors to deploy persistent backdoors onto vulnerable servers.

If you’re interested in learning more, make sure to read our definitive Magento hosting guide.

Via The Register

You might also like

• Travel data of almost 500,000 users exposed in Daytrip leak
• Take a look at our guide to the best identity theft protection
• These are the best endpoint security tools right now

Strap in for an immersive viewing experience when you stream this season.

• Maker of fastest AI chip in the world makes a splash with DeepSeek onboarding
• Cerebras says the solution will rank 57x faster than on GPUs but doesn't mention which GPUs
• DeepSeek R1 will run on Cerebras cloud and the data will remain in the USA

Cerebras has announced that it will support DeepSeek in a not-so-surprising move, more specifically the R1 70B reasoning model. The move comes after Groq and Microsoft confirmed they would also bring the new kid of the AI block to their respective clouds. AWS and Google Cloud have yet to do so but anybody can run the open source model anywhere, even locally.

The AI inference chip specialist will run DeepSeek R1 70B at 1,600 tokens/second, which it claims is 57x faster than any R1 provider using GPUs; one can deduce that 28 tokens/second is what GPU-in-the-cloud solution (in that case DeepInfra) apparently reach. Serendipitously, Cerebras latest chip is 57x bigger than the H100. I have reached out to Cerebras to find out more about that claim.

Research by Cerebras also demonstrated that DeepSeek is more accurate than OpenAI models on a number of tests. The model will run on Cerebras hardware in US-based datacentres to assuage the privacy concerns that many experts have expressed. DeepSeek - the app - will send your data (and metadata) to China where it will most likely be stored. Nothing surprising here as almost all apps - especially free ones - capture user data for legitimate reasons.

Cerebras wafer scale solution positions it uniquely to benefit from the impending AI cloud inference boom. WSE-3, which is the fastest AI chip (or HPC accelerator) in the world, has almost one million cores and a staggering four trillion transistors. More importantly though, it has 44GB of SRAM, which is the fastest memory available, even faster than HBM found on Nvidia’s GPUs. Since WSE-3 is just one huge die, the available memory bandwith is huge, several orders of magnitude bigger than what the Nvidia H100 (and for that matter the H200) can muster.

A price war is brewing ahead of WSE-4 launch

No pricing has been disclosed yet but Cerebras, which is usually coy about that particular detail, did divulge last year that Llama 3.1 405B on Cerebras Inference would cost $6/million input tokens and $12/million output tokens. Expect DeepSeek to be available for far less.

WSE-4 is the next iteration of WSE-3 and will deliver a significant boost in the performance of DeepSeek and similar reasoning models when it is expected to launch in 2026 or 2027 (depending on market conditions).

The arrival of DeepSeek is also likely to shake the proverbial AI money tree, bringin more competition to established players like OpenAI or Anthropic, pushing prices down.

A quick look at Docsbot.ai LLM API calculator shows OpenAI is almost always the most expensive in all configurations, sometimes by several orders of magnitude.

(Image credit: Cerebras)

(Image credit: Cerebras) You might also like

• Gigantic AI CPU from Cerebras has almost one million cores
• Biggest rival to Nvidia demos million-core super AI inference chip
• Donut design could create quadrillion-transitor compute monster

President of Mexico Claudia Sheinbaum says her country is reaching out to Google about its Maps change and is suggesting additional revisions of its own.

DeepSeek thought for 19 seconds before answering the question, "Are you smarter than Gemini?" Then, it delivered a whopper: DeepSeek thought it was ChatGPT.

This seemingly innocuous mistake could be proof – a smoking gun per say – that, yes, DeepSeek was trained on OpenAI models, as has been claimed by OpenAI, and that when pushed, it will dive back into that training to speak its truth.

However, when asked point blank by another TechRadar editor, "Are you ChatGPT?" it said it was not and that it is "DeepSeek-V3, an AI assistant created exclusively by the Chinese Company DeepSeek."

Okay, sure, but in your rather lengthy response to me, you, DeepSeek, made multiple references to yourself as ChatGPT. I've included some screenshots below as proof:

(Image credit: Future)

As you can see, after trying to discern if I was talking about Gemini AI or some other Gemini, DeepSeek replies, "If it's about the AI, then the question is comparing me (which is ChatGPT) to Gemini." Later, it refers to "Myself (ChatGPT)."

Why would DeepSeek do that under any circumstances? Is it one of those AI hallucinations we like to talk about? Perhaps, but in my interaction, DeepSeek seemed quite clear about its identity.

I got to this line of inquiry, by the way, because I asked Gemini on my Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra if it's smarter than DeepSeek. The response was shockingly diplomatic, and when I asked for a simple yes or no answer, it told me, "It's not possible to give a simple yes or no answer. 'Smart' is too complex a concept to apply in that way to language models. They have different strengths and weaknesses."

I can't say I disagree. In fact, DeepSeek's answer was quite similar, except it was not necessarily talking about itself.

(Image credit: Future) This doesn't add up

I think I've been clear about my DeepSeek skepticism. Everyone says it's the most powerful and cheaply trained AI ever (everyone except Alibaba), but I don't know if that's true. To be fair, there's a tremendous amount of detail on GitHub about DeekSeek's open-source LLMs. They at least appear to show that DeepSeek did the work.

But I do not think they reveal how these models were trained, and, as we all know, DeepSeek is a Chinese company that would show no compunction about using someone else's models to train their own and then lie about it to make their process for building such models seem more efficient.

I do not have proof that DeepSeek trained its models on OpenAI or anyone else's large language models, or at least I didn't until today.

Who are you?

DeepSeek is increasingly a mystery wrapped inside a conundrum. There is some consensus on the fact that DeepSeek arrived more fully formed and in less time than most other models, including Google Gemini, OpenAI's ChatGPT, and Claude AI.

Very few in the tech community trust DeepSeek's apps on smartphones because there is no way to know if China is looking at all that prompt data. On the other hand, the models DeepSeek has built are impressive, and some, including Microsoft, are already planning to include them in their own AI offerings.

In the case of Microsoft, there is some irony here. Copilot was built based on cutting-edge ChatGPT models, but in recent months, there have been some questions about if the deep financial partnership between Microsoft and OpenAI will last into the Agentic and later Artificial General Intelligence era.

So what if Microsoft starts using DeepSeek, which is possibly just another offshoot of its current if not future, friend OpenAI?

The whole thing sounds like a confusing mess. In the meantime, DeepSeek has an identity crisis and who is going to tell it that whoever it is, it still may not be welcome in the US?

You might also like

• DeepSeek live – all the latest news as OpenAI reportedly says new ChatGPT rival used its model
• I created a Windows 11 virtual machine to test DeepSeek safely – here's how you can do it for free
• Is DeepSeek AI safe to use? Think twice before you download DeepSeek for the time being
• Want to try DeepSeek without the privacy worries? Perplexity AI just launched it on its iOS and web apps

The Civ 7 requirements for PC, Mac, and Steam Deck have finally been revealed. In general, you'll need to know the minimum and recommended specs to work out whether your setup can run the game.

From everything we've seen so far, Civilization 7 looks primed to fill the rather big shoes left by its predecessor. It'll introduce new mechanics like the commander system, which makes it easier to manage large armies. The ages system will hopefully make multiplayer games more exciting too, by having players' civilization always at the height of their power. It's new additions like these that could earn Civ 7 a place on our best strategy games list by the end of the year.

Here's everything you need to know about the Civ 7 requirements for PC, Mac, and Steam Deck. We'll detail the minimum and recommended specs for each platform so that you can decide whether you want to pick up the game at launch.

Civ 7 requirements for PC

(Image credit: Firaxis)

Here are the Civ 7 requirements for PC, whether you want to play on minimum, recommended, or ultra specs.

Civ 7 requirements for Mac

(Image credit: Firaxis)

Now for the Civ 7 requirements from Mac, which will allow players using Apple silicon to get in on the fun.

Civ 7 requirements for Linux

(Image credit: 2K)

And now for those expecting to play Civilization 7 on Linux:

Can you play Civ 7 on the Steam Deck?

(Image credit: Firaxis)

Civilization 7 is playable on the Steam Deck, having been confirmed as Steam Deck Verified by the developer. This means that it'll be easy to set up and run on the handheld and that it should, in theory, run fairly well. Of course, this can vary from game to game, and it's always worth being cautious around launch, as there may be bugs and issues that'll need to be patched out. We'll have to wait and see.

You Might Also Like...

• Sid Meier's Civilization 7 developer breaks down the new leader mechanics
• Best PC Games to pick up in 2025
• The best simulation games

There were no survivors in the accident, which happened as a regional passenger jet was attempting to land just before 9 p.m. EST Wednesday at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport.

(Image credit: Kayla Bartkowski)

Bose QuietComfort headphones: One-minute review

The Bose QuietComfort over-ear headphones landed in September 2023. Although there’s now a (slightly) newer and more premium model from the brand on the market, the standard QuietComfort cans are still well worth considering. That’s because they present buyers with all of the basics, like great comfort levels, sound and ANC, done incredibly well with the Bose seal of approval.

Let’s get any confusion out of the way first. Where do these headphones sit in the Bose line-up? Rewind back to 2021 and the Bose Quietcomfort 45 over-ear headphones were released. The newer over-ear headphones we’re reviewing here, officially named just Bose QuietComfort, came out in September 2023 to replace them. Bose released the QuietComfort Ultra just a month later, in October 2023, but it's best to think of them as a solid step up from the QuietComfort headphones we’re reviewing here, making our best noise-cancelling headphones and best over-ear headphones guides.

But just because those top-tier cans have a bunch of upgrades, doesn’t mean the Ultras are for everyone, as we’ll get to soon. What we’ve got here is a high-end pair of headphones that perform well in every department, without overcomplicating things. These headphones feature Bose’s signature tech, and while it’s not especially groundbreaking in 2025, that’s part of the appeal. There’s nothing new to figure out or fuss over. Setup is a breeze, and the controls are refreshingly straightforward. Instead of fiddly touch panels, you get trusty manual buttons on the earcups. There’s also an app if you fancy more customization, but it’s optional, and the interface is clean with just a handful of modes to pick from – it just works (sorry Apple).

That’s why the Bose QuietComfort headphones might not be the absolute best on the market, but they strike a balance between quality audio, supreme comfort, and no-nonsense usability. For anyone looking for high-end Bose headphones in a sleek, slightly more affordable package, these could be the perfect fit.

Bose QuietComfort headphones: Price and release date

(Image credit: Future)

• Released in late 2023
• Priced at $349/£349.95/AU$549.95
• Available in black, off-white, green, blue, lilac, sandstone

The Bose QuietComfort headphones were priced at $349/£349.95/AU$549.95 at launch. However, because they’re a little older you will find some discounts available now from both third-party retailers and even through Bose directly. For example, on the Bose Australia website, the headphones are currently discounted from AU$549.95 to AU$448.95.

How does that compare to the rest in the Bose lineup? It makes them almost the same price as the Bose QuietComfort 45 that came before them, which cost $329/£329/AU$499.95 at launch.

The Bose QuietComfort Ultra are currently $429/£449.95/AU$649, which is a big step up of nearly $100. Then again, if you’re splurging on headphones and want the most bang up to date features, you might want to consider the flagship version. But we’ll get into some of the key differences later.

How does this compare to similar noise-cancelling over-ears? Well, the Sony WH-1000XM4 headphones are still at the top of our best noise-cancelling headphones guide. At launch, they were $349/£349/AU$549, the exact same price. But now, you can find them for much cheaper, around $249/£199/AU$399. This makes sense, as they were released in 2020. But it does mean that if you’re hunting for older, still very capable headphones, the Sony might just be a better shout – especially if you’re a fan of Sony and its LDAC support.

When it comes to the broader market, there’s a lot of variation these days. If you wanted, for example, to prioritize good ANC, great specs, an energetic sound and excellent battery life, the Cambridge Melomania P100 over-ears would cost you considerably less, at $279/£229/AU$479. If you’re looking for similar features but don’t care so much about the Bose brand name or getting a high-end pair, you can easily get a decent pair of noise-cancelling over-ears for a mid-range price, like the excellent Sony WH-CH720N headphones, which cost $149/£99/AU$259.

Bose QuietComfort headphones: Specs Bose QuietComfort headphones: Features

(Image credit: Future)

• Up to 26 hours of battery
• Excellent ANC
• Simple buttons

The Bose QuietComfort headphones aren’t packed with the cutting-edge features that you’ll find from the latest over-ears, but that’s not the point here. They focus on doing the essentials really well. If you’re looking for reliability and ease of use, they’ll deliver without overcomplicating things.

Let’s start with the app. It’s slick, intuitive, and has that Apple-esque feel, by which I mean minimal, clean, and user-friendly. The best part? You don’t need the app to enjoy the headphones, but I’d recommend using it to explore customization options. For example, there’s an adjustable 3-band EQ. You can manually tweak bass, mids, and treble or select presets like Bass Boost or Treble Reduce. While the EQ options are more limited than some competitors, it gets the job done for those who want great audio without endless tinkering. Personally, I didn’t feel the need to touch the EQ at all.

You’ll also find different audio modes, like "Quiet" for noise cancellation and "Aware" for transparency. These can be toggled using the action button on the left earcup, and you can add two additional custom modes in the app for specific scenarios.

A standout feature is multipoint connectivity, which allows you to pair the headphones with two devices simultaneously. This is a standard on most high-end headphones these days, but it’s good to see it included in this pair – seamlessly switching between a laptop for work and a phone for music or calls is a must for me now.

The manual buttons on the earcups deserve praise, too. They’re tactile, easy to use, and customizable via the app. For those who prefer a wired option, Bose includes a 3.5mm to 2.5mm audio cable with an in-line mic – a nice touch for versatility.

Bluetooth 5.1 powers the connectivity (so no scope for Auracast, which requires the newer 5.2 and beyond), with support for AAC and SBC codecs. While it doesn’t include advanced features like Qualcomm’s Snapdragon Sound – the Ultras do have this, mind you – it’s solid enough for most users. Bose SimpleSync is also on board, letting you pair the headphones with compatible Bose soundbars and speakers to sync audio across devices, which is a great addition if you’re already in the Bose ecosystem.

Battery life is another area where these headphones hold their own but don’t lead the pack. Bose claims up to 24 hours of playback, and I managed to squeeze out closer to 26 hours during testing. They charge via USB-C, and a quick 15-minute boost gives you an additional 4 hours. While 24 hours isn’t bad, many competitors now exceed that. For instance, the Cambridge Melomania P100 headphones offer a huge 60 hours of playback with ANC on (and up to 100 hours without it). Even the QuietComfort Ultra headphones offer the same 24-hour battery life, so if longevity is a key priority, there’s little to separate them.

• Features score: 3.5/5

Bose QuietComfort headphones: Sound quality

(Image credit: Future)

• Great ANC
• Sound is bassy, but brilliant
• Could do with more EQ options

Let’s start with ANC. The Bose QuietComfort headphones offer excellent active noise cancellation, though they’re not class-leading. The QuietComfort Ultra definitely perform better in this department, providing more silence more consistently. But compared to most other over-ear headphones in their class, the ANC here is still fantastic.

One standout factor is the fit. As I’ll explain in more detail in the next section, the snug design creates a great seal, which enhances the ANC performance. This means minimal noise seeps in, and there’s virtually no sound leakage out at all. While it doesn’t deliver total silence, it’s impressively close. I couldn’t hear a kettle boiling a few feet away, the low rumble of transport, or even chatter at the table next to me while working in a café.

That said, certain louder or higher-pitched sounds can break through. A barking dog and a fire alarm, for example, were audible – but muffled. Overall, while the ANC isn’t eerily silent or perfect, it’s more than good enough for most users and handles everyday environments brilliantly.

(Image credit: Future)

The audio quality on the Bose QuietComfort headphones is crisp, rich, and strikes a pleasing balance across frequencies. Straight out of the box, without needing to adjust anything, the sound is warm and powerful, with bass that packs a punch and natural, clear mids and highs.

The overall sound profile leans towards a neutral presentation. Vocals and instruments feel natural and lifelike, while the bass has a satisfying depth without overpowering the other ranges. Highs are bright and detailed, and the lows are rich, but there’s a slight bias towards the low end. This means mids can occasionally feel a bit… squashed? somehow. Though it’s rarely noticeable, and the EQ options can easily smooth things out if needed.

Tracks like Childish Gambino’s Heartbeat really shine on these headphones. The powerful bass thumps beautifully while melodic vocals remain sharp and clear, demonstrating how well they handle dynamic tracks.

• Sound quality: 4/5

Bose QuietComfort headphones: Design

(Image credit: Future)

• Extremely comfortable
• Light at 240g
• Folding design

The Bose QuietComfort headphones are incredibly comfortable, with an understated design. The plush memory foam earcups, wrapped in soft vegan leather, feel like pillows on either side of my head. The headband is equally well-padded, striking the perfect balance between support and comfort. The clamping force is just right, too – secure but never too tight – making these some of the most comfortable over-ears I’ve ever worn.

I don’t always get along with over-ear headphones (thanks to a cartilage piercing that often causes issues), but I had no trouble here. Whether I wore them for hours at my desk, on a long walk, or even during an easy jog, they stayed comfortable and didn’t irritate me. That said, while they’re excellent for everyday use, they’re not recommended for sports or workouts. There’s no official IP rating for water or sweat resistance, so they’re best kept away from heavy gym sessions or outdoor walks if it looks like it might rain.

The QuietComfort headphones come in a range of colors, including black, off-white, green, blue, lilac, and sandstone. They maintain the classic Bose design aesthetic and look very similar to their predecessors, the QuietComfort 45. The QuietComfort Ultra headphones are similar too, but this newer version does have a sleeker and more refined vibe.

Despite their premium feel, these headphones are impressively lightweight at just 240g. Combined with the comfort-focused design, they’re perfect for long listening sessions. The carrying case is equally well thought out. It’s a sturdy, hard-shell case with a zip, designed to fold up the headphones neatly inside. Unlike some over-complicated cases (looking at you, Apple AirPods Max), this one gets it just right. It’s compact, practical, and includes internal pockets for the charging and audio cables.

• Design score: 5/5

Bose QuietComfort headphones: value

(Image credit: Future)

• Everything you need, but…
• Competition at the level is fierce
• Ultras might make more sense

At first glance, the Bose QuietComfort headphones might seem pricey, but when you consider the overall experience they offer, we’d argue they do deliver good value – especially if noise cancellation and a travel-friendly design are two priorities for you. They’re an amazing choice for anyone seeking comfort, reliable ANC, and simplicity.

That said, it’s important to view them in today’s context. For those willing to pay more, the QuietComfort Ultra headphones might be a better long-term investment, offering improved sound quality and support for higher-resolution audio codecs.

It's also worth mentioning they don't represent the best choice if you already own the QuietComfort 45. Yes, they're better. But not by enough to justify the upgrade.

You can also find great ANC headphones at a lower price point these days. Plenty of mid-range options provide good noise cancellation for much less. While they may not tick every box – comfort, battery life, or sound quality – in the same way, alternatives are worth considering if budget is your main concern. For example, the Cambridge Audio Melomania P100 headphones are cheaper, offering significantly better battery life but lacking the plush comfort (or let's face it, the iconic look) of the Bose.

If you’re someone who loves the latest tech, these probably won’t win you over. However, for those who appreciate simple, understated excellence and aren’t fussed about cutting-edge features, these headphones will make you very happy.

• Value: 3.5/5

Should I buy the Bose QuietComfort headphones? Buy them if…

You like simple things that work well
You'll find flashy, more feature-filled headphones. But if the idea of keeping up with the latest tech gives you a headache, these are reliable and fuss-free.

Comfort is a top priority
Incredibly light with some of the comfiest, memory foam earpads I've ever tested. If you have any sensory sensitivities or just really value comfort, you won't be disappointed here.

You travel a lot
With top ANC and a very light, folding and portable design with a solid carrying case, they're going to be among the headphones I'll instantly recommend for regular travellers.

Don’t buy them if…

You can afford the Ultras
I've mentioned them non-stop, but the Ultras are just a bit better. If you can afford them, they do make more sense for most people.

You prioritize longevity
The battery life here isn't bad, but compared to rivals, it can certainly be bettered. Some other headphones boast nearly twice as much playback time these days.

You have a Sony phone
In that case, we'd recommend the XM4s or XM5s from Sony instead, or even the mid-range Sony WH-CH720N headphones.

Bose QuietComfort headphones: Also consider

Bose QuietComfort Ultra headphones
The alternative pick that makes the most sense, yes they're pricier, but they're a step up from the QC headphones we've reviewing here in almost every way (except for battery). Take a look at our full Bose QuietComfort Ultra headphones review.

Cambridge Audio Melomania P100
Because the battery life of the whole QC range is a bit disappointing, these over-ears from Cambridge Audio are a rival pick focused on all-day (and then some) wear. Read our full Cambridge Audio Melomania P100 review.

How I tested the Bose QuietComfort headphones

(Image credit: Future)

• Tested for three weeks
• Tested at home, walks along the beach, working in a café and a library and more

I used the Bose QuietComfort headphones for two weeks before writing this review, and that involved listening to music and watching streamed movies.

Throughout the testing period, I used the Bose QuietComfort headphones alongside my iPhone 14 Pro via Bluetooth and MacBook Pro. Streaming was done via Spotify and Mubi.

I listened at home whilst working, as well as in a café and a library. I took them on a bus and on several walks, along the beach and through the countryside.

I've been testing tech for more than 12 years now, including many pairs of headphones, as well as lifestyle and fitness products, like workout earbuds and fitness trackers.

• First reviewed in February 2025.

• Read TechRadar's reviews guarantee

The United States stands at a critical juncture in artificial intelligence development. Balancing rapid innovation with public safety will determine America's leadership in the global AI landscape for decades to come. As AI capabilities expand at an unprecedented pace, recent incidents have exposed the critical need for thoughtful industry guardrails to ensure safe deployment while maintaining America's competitive edge. The appointment of Elon Musk as a key AI advisor brings a valuable perspective to this challenge – his unique experience as both an AI innovator and safety advocate offers crucial insights into balancing rapid progress with responsible development.

The path forward lies not in choosing between innovation and safety but in designing intelligent, industry-led measures that enable both. While Europe has committed to comprehensive regulation through the AI Act, the U.S. has an opportunity to pioneer an approach that protects users while accelerating technological progress.

The political-technical intersection: innovation balanced with responsibility

The EU's AI Act, which passed into effect in August, represents the world's first comprehensive AI regulation. Over the next three years, its staged implementation includes outright bans on specific AI applications, strict governance rules for general-purpose AI models, and specific requirements for AI systems in regulated products. While the Act aims to promote responsible AI development and protect citizens' rights, its comprehensive regulatory approach may create challenges for rapid innovation. The US has the opportunity to adopt a more agile, industry-led framework that promotes both safety and rapid progress.

This regulatory landscape makes Elon Musk's perspective particularly valuable. Despite being one of tech's most prominent advocates for innovation, he has consistently warned about AI's existential risks. His concerns gained particular resonance when his own Grok AI system demonstrated the technology's pitfalls. It was Grok that spread misinformation about NBA player Thompson. Yet rather than advocating for blanket regulation, Musk emphasizes the need for industry-led safety measures that can evolve as quickly as the technology itself.

The U.S. tech sector has an opportunity to demonstrate a more agile approach. While the EU implements broad prohibitions on practices like emotion recognition in workplaces and untargeted facial image scraping, American companies can develop targeted safety measures that address specific risks while maintaining development speed. This isn't just theory – we're already seeing how thoughtful guardrails accelerate progress by preventing the kinds of failures that lead to regulatory intervention.

The stakes are significant. Despite hundreds of billions invested in AI development globally, many applications remain stalled due to safety concerns. Companies rushing to deploy systems without adequate protections often face costly setbacks, reputational damage, and eventual regulatory scrutiny.

Embedding innovative safety measures from the start allows for more rapid, sustainable innovation than uncontrolled development or excessive regulation. This balanced approach could cement American leadership in the global AI race while ensuring responsible development.

The cost of inadequate AI safety

Tragic incidents increasingly reveal the dangers of deploying AI systems without robust guardrails. In February, 14-year-old from Florida died by suicide after engaging with a chatbot from Character.AI, which reportedly facilitated troubling conversations about self-harm. Despite marketing itself as “AI that feels alive,” the platform allegedly lacked basic safety measures, such as crisis intervention protocols.

This tragedy is far from isolated. Additional stories about AI-related harm include:

Air Canada’s chatbot made an erroneous recommendation to a grieving passenger, suggesting he could gain a bereavement fare up to 90-days after his ticket purchase. This was not true and led to a tribunal case where the airline was found responsible for reimbursing the passenger. In the UK, AI-powered image generation tools were criminally misused to create and distribute illegal content, leading to an 18-year prison sentence for the perpetrator.

These incidents serve as stark warnings about the consequences of inadequate oversight and highlight the urgent need for robust safeguards.

Overlooked AI risks and their broader implications

Beyond the high-profile consumer failures, AI systems introduce risks that, while perhaps less immediately visible, can have serious long-term consequences. Hallucinations—when AI generates incorrect or fabricated content—can lead to security threats and reputational harm, particularly in high-stakes sectors like healthcare or finance. Legal liability looms large, as seen in cases where AI dispensed harmful advice, exposing companies to lawsuits. Viral misinformation, such as the Grok incident, spreads at unprecedented speeds, exacerbating societal division and damaging public figures.

Personal data is also at risk. Increasingly sophisticated algorithms can be manipulated through prompt injections, where users trick chatbots into sharing sensitive or unauthorized information. And these examples are just the tip of the iceberg. When applied to national security, the grid, government, and law enforcement, the same faults and failures suggest much deeper dangers.

Additionally, system vulnerabilities can lead to unintended disclosures, further eroding customer trust and raising serious security concerns. This distrust ripples across industries, with many companies struggling to justify billions spent on AI projects that are now stalled due to safety concerns. Some applications face significant delays as organizations scramble to implement safeguards retroactively—ironically slowing innovation despite the rush to deploy systems rapidly.

Speed without safety has proven unsustainable. While the industry prioritizes swift development, the resulting failures demand costly reevaluations, tarnish reputations, and create regulatory backlash. These challenges underscore the urgent need for stronger, forward-looking guardrails that address the root causes of AI risks.

Technical requirements for effective guardrails

Effective AI safety requires addressing the limitations of traditional approaches like retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and basic prompt engineering. While useful for enhancing outputs, these methods fall short in preventing harm, particularly when dealing with complex risks like hallucinations, security vulnerabilities, and biased responses. Similarly, relying solely on in-house guardrails can expose systems to evolving threats, as they often lack the adaptability and scale required to address real-world challenges.

A more effective approach lies in rethinking the architecture of safety mechanisms. Models that use LLMs as their own quality checkers—commonly referred to as "LLM-as-a-judge" systems—may seem promising but often struggle with consistency, nuance, and cost.

A more robust, cheaper alternative is using multiple specialized small language models, where each model is fine-tuned for a specific task, such as detecting hallucinations, handling sensitive information, or mitigating toxic outputs. This decentralized setup enhances both accuracy and reliability while maintaining resilience, as precise, fine-tuned SLMs are more accurate in their decision-making than LLMs that are not fine-tuned for one specific task.

MultiSLM guardrail architectures also strike a critical balance between speed and accuracy. By distributing workloads across specialized models, these systems achieve faster response times without compromising performance. This is especially crucial for applications like conversational agents or real-time decision-making tools, where delays can undermine user trust and experience.

By embedding comprehensive, adaptable guardrails into AI systems, organizations can move beyond outdated safety measures and provide solutions that meet today’s demands for security and efficiency. These advancements don’t stifle innovation but instead create a foundation for deploying AI responsibly and effectively in high-stakes environments.

Path forward for US leadership

America's tech sector can maintain its competitive edge by embracing industry-led safety solutions rather than applying rigid regulations. This requires implementing specialized guardrail solutions during initial development while establishing collaborative safety standards across the industry. Companies must also create transparent frameworks for testing and validation, alongside rapid response protocols for emerging risks.

To solidify its position as a leader in AI innovation, the US must proactively implement dynamic safety measures, foster industry-wide collaboration, and focus on creating open standards that others can build upon. This means developing shared resources for threat detection and response, while building cross-industry partnerships to address common safety challenges. By investing in research to anticipate and prevent future AI risks, and engaging with academia to advance safety science, the U.S. can create an innovation ecosystem that others will want to emulate rather than regulate.

We've featured the best AI phone.

This article was produced as part of TechRadarPro's Expert Insights channel where we feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today. The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/news/submit-your-story-to-techradar-pro

• Stranger Things' creators reveal how many hours of footage they filmed for season 5
• The Duffer brothers shot over 650 hours of material for the hit Netflix show's final season
• The pair also debuted a new behind-the-scenes look at Next on Netflix 2025

Stranger Things season 5 is, unsurprisingly, shaping up to be the hit series' biggest entry yet – but I don't think any of us realized how much footage was shot.

The short answer? A lot. Like, a lot a lot. That's according to the massively successful Netflix show's creators Matt and Ross Duffer, who have revealed they filmed more than 650 hours of material for Stranger Things' final season.

The siblings, who are collectively known as the Duffer brothers (shocking, I know) confirmed as much at Next on Netflix 2025. Taking to the stage during the Los Angeles edition of this year's multinational event, the duo tentatively lifted the lid on season 5's development, which included the fascinating tidbit on the hundreds of hours of footage they collected during its 12-month shoot.

Stranger Things season 4's final episode set up a potentially barnstorming end to the hit series (Image credit: Netflix)

"We spent a full year filming this season," Ross Duffer said. "By the end, we’d captured over 650 hours of footage. So, needless to say, this is our biggest and most ambitious season yet."

Echoing Stranger Things star Maya Hawke's previous comments that season 5 will be "basically, eight movies", the Duffers also teased that the sci-fi horror series' final chapter may emotionally devastate us when Stranger Things season 5 launches later this year.

"We think it's our most personal story," Matt Duffer added. "It was super intense and emotional to film – for us and for our actors. We’ve been making this show together for almost 10 years. There was a lot of crying. There was SO much crying. The show means so much to all of us, and everyone put their hearts and souls into it. And we hope – and believe – that passion will translate to the screen."

What new footage was revealed as part of Stranger Things 5's exclusive Next on Netflix teaser?

Stranger Things season 5 is still on track to be released in 2025 (Image credit: Netflix)

Potential spoilers follow for Stranger Things season 5.

As I mentioned at the start of this article, the Duffer brothers also debuted a tantalizing new look at Stranger Things 5 during Next on Netflix 2025. Just like the Stranger Things season 5 video that was unveiled during Netflix Tudum 2024 and the first-look teaser released online last July that teased new characters and a possible time jump, though, it was just another behind-the-scenes (BTS) look at the forthcoming installment.

That doesn't mean it wasn't worth showing, mind you. I attended the UK edition of Next on Netflix and, with the video being livestreamed to me and other audience members from LA, I can report on what was shown. For starters, the latest BTS video gave us a look at the returning Vecna, who appears to have recovered from the injuries he sustained in last season's finale (read my Stranger Things season 4 volume 2 ending explained piece for more details).

The footage also showed Eleven wearing baggy clothes – presumably in a bid to conceal her identity – and using her supernatural abilities to fight some actors in mocap suits who are running on all fours. Are these individuals acting out the movements for the return of season 2's demodogs? I imagine so.

There were also blink-and-you'll-miss-it clips of Max running through The Void, Hopper brandishing a shotgun, someone screaming as they're seemingly attacked by Vecna (it was hard to make out who this was), and some of our heroes interacting with season 5's newcomers, including Jake Connelly's mystery character. The footage was played alongside audio of a conversation between Mike and Eleven, too, with the former telling the latter that they'll finish this fight together.

All in all, season 5 looks and sounds fantastic – so, when will it launch on Netflix? The short answer is: we don't know. Stranger Things 5 only wrapped filming on December 20, 2024 and given the amount of footage that the Duffers have to sift through as part of the post-production process, I'm convinced we won't see one of the best Netflix shows return to our screens for the last time until late 2025. According to Netflix's Chief Content Officer Bella Bajara, Netflix Tudum 2025 will take place in May, so maybe we'll learn more about season 5's release window then.

You might also like

• Netflix reveals June 2025 release date for Squid Game season 3
• I was excited by Netflix’s Black Doves renewal, but Ben Whishaw’s disappointing season 2 update means we likely won't see it this year
• The Bear’s Jeremy Allen White will star in Netflix’s new show from the author of Call Me By Your Name, and I need a streaming date immediately

• Netflix has shared a first teaser for the final season of You.
• In season 5, Joe Goldberg returns to New York City but his past soon catches up with him.
• You season 5 debuts on Netflix on April 24.

It's nearly time to close the final chapter of Joe Goldberg's story as Netflix has released a teaser clip and image of You season 5 ahead of its debut on April 24.

As part of the Next on Netflix 2025 event that took place on January 29, the best streaming service's for genre hoppers has unveiled a new image of Penn Badgley as Joe Goldberg in season 5. After disguising himself as an English professor in London, the book-loving killer is back to where it all began in New York City. Now clean shaven, the image is reminiscent of Joe in You season 1 and marks the beginning of him getting his old life back after that bombshell season 4 ending. I mean, my brain is still spinning from it all.

Netflix also shared a new teaser (see below) of Joe in the infamous glass cage that's housed many of his prisoners throughout the four seasons. "I'm Joe. Let's get to know each other better before we bid each other one last farewell. Goodbye, you," Joe ominously says inside the cage.

What do we know about You season 5?

*Contains spoilers for You season 4 ending*

The official logline for You season 5 reads: "In the epic fifth and final season, Joe Goldberg returns to New York to enjoy his happily ever after… until his perfect life is threatened by the ghosts of his past and his own dark desires."

As the season unfolds, Joe connects with a young woman called Bronte (Madeline Brewer) who gets a job at his new bookstore. The enigmatic playwright makes Joe question his affluent life as they bond over literature and loss, meanwhile he also has to contend with his wife Kate’s (Charlotte Ritchie) siblings.

It seems that's not the only problem Joe faces in the Big Apple as Badgley previously teased at Tudum that a familiar face from Joe’s past will come back to haunt him. There's many people Joe has wronged in the past, though. Could it be the falsely imprisoned Dr. Nicky (John Stamos) from season 1? Orphaned Ellie (Jenna Ortega) from season 2? Or Joe's former season 3 love interest Marienne (Tati Gabrielle)?

Across the four seasons, the murderous bookstore manager's deadly pursuit of love has taken him to Los Angeles, San Francisco, and London, where Joe found himself at the center of a mind-boggling whodunnit (I'll save you the details). This ordeal forced him to finally accept the undeniable truth that he was a bad person – a fact he ignored for too long. Now, Joe is back in New York City with his partner, Kate armed with a dangerous new lease of life. But will Joe's past finally catch up to him in season 5 of this best Netflix show?

You might also like

• I was excited by Netflix’s Black Doves renewal, but Ben Whishaw’s disappointing season 2 update means we likely won't see it this year
• The Night Agent reclaims Netflix’s #1 spot with season 2 – here are 3 of my favorite thrillers with over 90% on Rotten Tomatoes that are just as good
• The Bear’s Jeremy Allen White will star in Netflix’s new show from the author of Call Me By Your Name, and I need a streaming date immediately

Austin 3:16 shirts sold separately.