Having tested several of the best open-ear headphones now, I’ve been waiting for a really affordable pair of earbuds to shake up this burgeoning and relatively new audio market that's perhaps still looking for a reliable budget offering. So when I heard that AceFast had made some open-fit earbuds, I was ready to be excited – however, I was wrong to be.
AceFast isn’t a big player in the game yet, but I tested the AceFast T9 last year, and loved the funky look, low price and emphasis on usability. I was expecting the new AceFit Pro to replicate all three of these traits, then. Sadly, it only actually nails one.
Arguably, the one attribute it does nail is the most important check-box for open earbuds. These designs typically hover just over the ear canal instead of sitting in it, to ensure you can hear your surroundings while listening to music. And AceFast’s have a reliable, comfortable fit that doesn’t wobble in your ear or fall out without warning, issues other open-ears have certainly fallen foul of.
But AceFast drops the ball with the other two traits. The price is one, as not only are they not cheap earbuds, they’re actually more expensive than some impressive mid-range rivals from Honor and Huawei.
And then there’s the design, which initially began as my favorite thing about these earbuds. Not only do they come in a range of colors, all toting see-through cases with LED lights that you can customize the hue of, but they also boast battery displays. This lets you know the battery percentage left for the case, and how close to fully-charged the buds are. And I absolutely love it – it’s incredibly handy in planning your charging and knowing how much listening time you have left (that’s despite the battery life being pretty awful, all things considered).
Unfortunately, the AceFit Pro’s design is its biggest strength but also its biggest weakness, with a few sad and curious design choices. The sad one is that, like many other cheap earbuds, the case is unreliable – just two weeks into my testing, the right earbud developed a problem that meant the case didn’t always recognize its presence. It wouldn’t always charge when in the case, or turned on when removed, and though removing and reinserting the bud several times would generally resolve the issue, it’s not a good sign for the longevity of the AceFast AceFit Pro.
The ‘curious’ decision I spoke of was to put the charging port on the underside of the case. To power it up, you have to flip it on its back like a beached turtle.
Beyond that, the AceFast AceFit Pro don’t do that much to impress. They have a limited range of features (though they do have an equalizer at least, which you can’t say about all open-ears) and the audio quality leaves a lot to be desired.
Most of these issues could be hand-waved with the simple explanation that cheap earbuds aren’t perfect, and that’s what I did a lot of the time during my testing… but the inescapable fact is that the AceFast AceFit Pro aren’t actually that low-cost, according to pricing we currently have (more on this later). They just have all the hallmarks of cheap earbuds – and all in all, that makes them hard to recommend.
AceFast AceFit Pro review: Specifications AceFast AceFit Pro review: Price and availability (Image credit: Future)The AceFast AceFit Pro were launched on Kickstarter, in a campaign which ran from mid-January to late-February 2025. Briefly, you could buy them on Amazon, but we've had further news from AceFast since publishing this review…
AceFast tells us that the AceFit Pro are expected to launch (on Amazon, that is) around mid May. At the time of writing, the AceFast AceFit Pro are not actually on sale in the US, UK or Australia, though based on precedent (and the Pro's siblings, which we'll get to) I'd expect them to hit Amazon's UK site at roughly the same time as they'll launch in the US.
You could briefly pick the buds up for $159.99 (roughly £120, AU$250) so they’re mid-range open earbuds, in the rough price bracket that most rivals inhabit (although towards on the higher end of the spectrum than most contemporaries). I'll continue with this review based on that pricing.
For some context, the also-open-ear AceFast AceFit Air sell for $79.99 / £79.99 (roughly AU$160) so those at least are affordable earbuds.
AceFast AceFit Pro review: Design (Image credit: Future)It’s unusual to find much to say about the case of headphones; that’s never the case with AceFast products. The case – which you can pick up in white, pink, purple or green, as with the buds – is transparent, letting users pretend they’re putting on gadgets from the noughties instead of the twenties.
That’s not all, as the case also has a digital battery display that shows you the overall power of the case in a percentage, as well as the charge in each bud while they’re enclosed. This isn’t just a funky design element but a really useful way to know that your case is fully charged, to prevent overcharging, and to remind you when it needs charging too. I really appreciated this feature and it deserves being mentioned in the ‘Pros’ list of this review.
The feature came in handy when (and this is where things take a turn for the worse) it showed me that one of the buds wasn’t charging. The AceFit Pro buds weren’t always good at recognizing that they were in their charging case: they wouldn’t begin powering up when inserted, or automatically turn on when taken out, and I’d have to wiggle the buds or remove and re-insert them for it to work. I can’t say whether this was a problem with my review unit or a larger issue with the device but it’s not an uncommon headache among cheap earbuds (and in the case of these buds, it didn’t completely scupper the buds, which isn’t always true).
This feature is potentially disastrous, so if you’re confused why I’m not making a bigger deal about it than I am, it’s because the buds still worked, and because I can’t say with any certainty that it’s not just my review unit. It seems unlikely, but it’s not impossible.
Yes, it is an odd spot for the USB-C charger (Image credit: Future)As well as the battery display, the case has an array of LED lights to fully embody that noughties aesthetic. You can change the color of this via the app, and since it only turns on when the case is open there’s no need to turn it off.
The case is quite thin, and it’s light too at just 74g. It looks like it’s made from cheap plastic, as you can probably see from the images, but it actually feels surprisingly premium and solid when you get your mitts on it. It’s also sturdy, as I found out through dropping it repeatedly. This wasn’t my butter-fingers but a symptom of the shape of the case: it’s rounded like a pebble, not even flat on the bottom, and so it had a habit of sliding off things I put it on if they weren’t totally flat.
Another weird quirk of the case is that the charging port is on the bottom, meaning you need to turn the case on its back like a flipped turtle in order to power it up – apparently AceFast didn’t take notes from the Apple Magic Mouse. Functionally it doesn’t have much of an effect but it means you can’t really see the battery display while charging, and it frankly looks pretty silly too.
Finally, we move to the earbuds. These will look pretty standard to people familiar with open earbuds: A large pill that hovers over your ears, and a sports loop that ends in a counterweight ad battery pack behind the ear. Your earbuds will be the same color as your charging case.
The AceFit Pro buds are comfortable and lightweight to wear, at 7.8g each. I only rarely found issues with them wobbling too much during exercise, and they felt pretty flexible to fit different ears too. They’re also protected against sweat with an IP54 rating.
There’s a touch-sensitive area on the buds’ body for gesture controls, but this was less reliable than South London buses and I rapidly gave up any hope of using them.
Something that may impress certain users (and upset others) is that the AceFast logo on each bud lights up, which is a lot more obvious than the simple, single LED that most buds have. I’ll admit I did feel quite self-conscious working out with a giant glowing logo on each ear, but the app does let you turn this off.
Even early into my testing for the AceFit Pro, I was surprised by how quickly the battery level dropped. AceFast says the buds have a battery life of 6 hours and the case bumps that to 25 hours, both relatively low figures compared to rivals. But read the fine print and you discover that that’s listening at just 60% volume – I don’t think I ever listened with the volume this quiet.
In my personal testing, I found the AceFit Pro to have a battery life of about five hours, listening at around 80%-90% of their volume (out and about I generally used them one or two volume increments below max volume). That is, frankly, pretty awful battery life – even the AirPods Pro 2 beat that! You know if your product is beaten in battery life by a 2022 Apple option, it’s not quite up to par.
(Image credit: Future)The AceFit Pro can pair to the AceFast phone app, but it doesn’t offer all features that buyers might hope for. No ANC, no find-my-buds feature, no listening tests, but at least there’s an 8-band equalizer and a few presets, as well as the ability to change gesture controls.
It feels like the main point of the app is to customize the LED lights of the bud and case. You can toggle whether the AceFast logo lights up on the buds and change the light color and effect pattern of the case. It’s not exactly a feature which makes the app a must-download, I'd say.
The AceFit Pro connect to your phone with Bluetooth 5.4 and I never had any issues with it during my testing.
If, like me, you’re used to cheap-and-cheery AceFast buds sounding… well, cheap, then you might be surprised to peruse a little down the AceFit Pro specs list: three-magnet 20x8mm speakers, bass enhancement tech and a special design to reduce sound loss – it's all painting a very pretty picture.
The acoustic design sadly comes to nothing, because these earbuds simply don’t sound amazing, embodying once again AceFast’s modus operandi of ‘cheap and cheerful’. The audio is fine for the budget-conscious end of the market, but the AceFit Pro can't compete with the big dogs they find themselves up against at this price.
The buds have quite dramatic V-shaped audio – bass and treble vocals abound, but at the expense of just about anything else. As I write this, I’m listening to Counting Crows’ Omaha. I can hear the vocals and bass well but the accordion frequently trails off into nothingness and the acoustic guitar is almost totally missing.
(Image credit: Future)It doesn’t help that audio isn’t very detailed, with character and texture missing from instruments and vocals. And this is when I’m listening indoors – as open-ear users will know, buds like this sound much worse when you’re out and about and they’re competing with every passing bus, street busker and annoying fellow human playing social media videos straight out of their phone's speakers instead of using their own headphones.
For what it's worth, audio loss outside isn't as bad on some other buds I've tested. It's still noticeable, but that's hard to avoid due to the nature of open-ears.
There’s some peaking going on here too, though it’s admittedly hidden well by the fact it’s largely happening in the midrange frequencies – which are so lost in the mix themselves that you might not notice!
I can see buyers looking for simple workout buds finding the AceFit Pro acceptable due to the audio profile, but audiophiles – the few of them who’d ever consider open earbuds – won’t love these buds.
The AceFast AceFit Pro have all the trappings of the best cheap open-ear buds… except the price.
If these buds had launched for more than a third less (or even better, half the price), I’d be hailing them as a great option for budget-conscious buyers, however the various issues are hard to overlook when you consider the price you’re paying for these earbuds. The low battery life, unimpressive audio and possible longevity concerns all hurt when you’re paying $160 (or equivalent) for earbuds. The competition at this level is fierce – and AceFast simply hasn't aced it.
If you can find the AceFit Pro for below $100 (or equivalent), they could be worth picking up, but it’s hard to recommend them even then, especially when the AceFit Air are still cheaper.
You like the battery display
The battery display is a really useful feature that I've loved on various AceFast gadgets, as it's both functional and fun.
You want a reliable on-ear fit
I've tested a fair few open-ear buds that don't sit still when you're walking, running or working out, so sometimes it's nice for buds to just fit reliably.
You find them majorly discounted
The AceFit Pro doesn't offer a great value-for-money proposition, but that could change if you find them with a meaty discount.
Don't buy them if...You need to listen for long periods of time
Sub-6-hour battery life gadgets are always hard to recommend, due to many use cases requiring longer-lasting buds.
You're worried about how long they'll last
The fact that my buds kept falling off surfaces and partly broke may put off people who've been burned by cheap tech before.
You want top-tier audio
Actually, you can get great audio in an open-ear design (from Huawei or Honor, see below), but if audio quality is your chief concern, you won't enjoy the AceFit Pro.View Deal
Also considerHuawei FreeArc
These are the best open-ear buds I've tested and they significantly undercut the AceFast AceFit Pro. They sound great, they last longer in your ears and they fit comfortably.
Read our full Huawei FreeArc review
AceFast AceFit Air
The Pro's siblings, which I haven't actually tested, seem to be everything the Pro aren't. They're more affordable, last longer and weigh less, yet don't sound any worse and seem to fit just the same. You're missing out on the battery display, mostly.
How I testedI tested the Acefast AceFit Pro for two weeks in order to write this review, though I continued to test them for an extra week during the writing process.
The use cases match how I tested many rivals: I paired them to an Android smartphone (and, a few times, a Windows laptop) to go on walks, work at home or in the office, go on runs, cycle around my city and work out at the gym.
I have six years of experience testing tech for TechRadar, which includes many earbuds. I've tested five different pairs of open-ear buds in the last four months and have plenty more waiting to be tested...
Blurb is an affordable printing service that allows you to produce your own high-quality photo books. Offering a wide range of sizes, from a Lilliputian 13 x 13cm to a colossal 33 x 28cm, five kinds of paper stock and three cover options, it offers a huge range of products. And unlike many photo book services, you can design books in a variety of ways, using professional design tools like Adobe InDesign or Lightroom or Blurb's bespoke software, BookWright.
For those who fancy creating a photo book without the fuss, Blurb’s BookWright software has plenty of options. You can let it do all the work: just upload your photos, click the ‘Save Me Time’ button and it will automatically place your photos on the page. However, I did find when trying this feature out that BookWright defaulted to displaying a single full-size image per page, so you’ll likely only want to use this as a starting point.
Helpfully, there’s another option: dragging one of Blurb’s 188 different layouts onto each page, then choosing the order and placement of your photos yourself. These templates offer a great amount of variety, from large images with smaller photographs inset to blocks of free-flowing text accompanied by tiny thumbnails.
(Image credit: Blurb / Future)Keen to blaze your own trail? Creating your own unique designs using Blurb is more flexible than pretty much any of the best photo book services. Simply select the photo frame tool, draw a frame, and then you can click and drag photos from your uploaded library.
Adding type is just as straightforward: once you’ve drawn a text frame, punch in your text and then you can tweak fonts, styling and alignment to achieve your desired look. And you can also link text frames together, making it possible to automatically flood text from frame to frame.
While most photo book services offer this kind of hassle-free placement, what sets Blurb apart for me is how accurate you can be. I was able replicate TechRadar’s photo book test template with surgical precision, thanks to the detailed properties menu available when you double-click each element. Not only can you precisely set the size of photo and text frames in inches, but you can also easily rotate and flip photographs, and add borders and round the edges of frames, giving you really precise control over the final look of elements on the page.
On top of this, standardizing layouts and alignments is a breeze. Not only do frames handily snap to each other or to the vertical and horizontal midpoint of each page, but you can also set ruler guides to specific measurements, making it simple to use common alignments from page to page. I also really appreciated the ability to save layouts for reuse – this meant I could easily duplicate arrangements for multiple different spreads, without the hassle of recreating them from scratch.
Image 1 of 3(Image credit: Future)Image 2 of 3(Image credit: Future)Image 3 of 3(Image credit: Future)While Blurb doesn’t offer the pages and pages of clip art that some photo book tools do, what it does offer is actually far more flexible than many rivals. Blurb allowed me to create custom shapes with dimensions of my choosing, as well as dialing in precise RGB color values, rather than being limited to a bunch of preset imagery. Sure, it only offers a spectrum of 386 in its color wheel, there's no color picker, and I’d have loved the option to input Hex and CMYK values as well; but Blurb still offers far better precision than many of its competitors.
Once I was done finessing my photo book, all I had to do was click Review and Upload. This runs you through any warnings and gives you a chance to fix flagged issues, as well as running a spell check. That’s a feature not many photo book platforms offer, so it’s a nice additional touch – although its suggestion that I correct ‘TechRadar’ to ‘technocrat’ feels like a level of sass I’m not used to receiving from software.
Colors within were vibrant without feeling like they were oversaturated – the moss on a log has come out in a gorgeous, vivid green, while a shot of an aurora shows off a rainbow of rich pastel hues. The resolution of images also looked exquisitely detailed; for example the bristle of grey hairs in one subject’s beard were incredibly well-defined, adding real depth to the image.
(Image credit: Future)There were few visible print errors either. As you’d imagine from the precision of its tools, alignments looked spot on, with no awkward gaps between frames or ragged corners, and there were no issues with the edges of pages being unevenly trimmed. It is worth noting that my book did arrive with some damage, with an unsightly dent in the front cover. The blame for this probably falls more on the shoulders of FedEx, but I would appreciate some additional packaging to protect books from these kinds of knocks.
But however strong the finished result was, perhaps the most remarkable thing about Blurb’s photo book was how reasonably priced it was. Setting aside the eye-watering delivery costs for the Australian market, the $80.72 / £50.76 / AU$99.44 plus $6.99 / £8.99 / AU$71.49 price for our sample was much cheaper than the $130 (around £100 / AU$200) cost charged by Shutterfly or $145.78 (roughly £112) charged by Printique. That’s a very decent price to pay, particularly in light of the (generally) excellent finish.
(Image credit: Future) Should I buy the Blurb photo book? Buy it if…You want precise, accurate design tools
Blurb’s BookWright software is capable of producing unerringly precise designs – you can manually set precise dimensions for frames, punch in RGB color values, use ruler guides to use the same positions from page to page. Alternatively, if you’re a design pro, you can create your own book from scratch in Adobe InDesign or Lightroom.
You want a top-quality finished photo book
Blurb’s photo books are produced to an excellent standard. Colors are vibrant without looking artificial, the clarity of printed images is genuinely impressive, and there are also no glaring errors with alignment or the margins of pages.
You want an online solution
Using an app is the only way you can design a book for Blurb’s platform. So if you’re unable to install third-party apps on your computer and don’t have a tablet to design on, you may find it slightly trickier to use the platform.
You want drag-and-drop clip art
Blurb is more focused on precise photo- and text-focused layouts than stock illustrations and flourishes. If you’re looking to decorate your photo book with clip art or pre-formatted aphorisms, it doesn’t have a lot of options.
Printique
Printique is another very solid photo book platform. You can adjust the measurements of elements accurately, and punch in specific color values, and it also offers 88 pre-made themes, making it easier to tailor your photo book to a specific style. One serious caveat though is that it’s significantly more expensive – our 12 x 12-inch photo book cost us $145.78 including delivery (roughly £112), which is almost double the price of Blurb.
Snapfish
If you’re looking for even more of a bargain, Snapfish might well be the way to go. While a 12 x 12-inch 28 page photo book like ours costs roughly the same price, at $84.95 / £46.95 / AU$101.55, Snapfish also offers regular deals of 40% off, which would bring this down to an absurdly low $50.97 / £28.17 / AU$60.93. Unfortunately, Snapfish books don’t have quite as accurate color as Blurb, looking a little duller, and you don't get the ability to set specific values for dimensions or hues. But, if you catch it on sale, it’s still one of the cheapest photo books you’ll find. Read our full Snapfish photo book review.
TechRadar has a specific photo book template that we try to recreate from scratch using the photo book platform we're testing. When testing out Blurb’s BookWright app, I duplicated this as accurately as possible, copying the exact dimensions of photo and text frames, precisely reproducing the positioning and alignment of elements, and using the exact RGB color values from the original. I also spent multiple hours playing with Blurb's various templates to get a sense of the kinds of layouts that were available.
When the final printed product arrived, I checked it for damage and marks from handling or the printing process. Next, I compared it to the photo book template to see how the colors and alignments compared to the original, specifically looking for any patches of low resolution imagery or inaccurate hues.
In terms of experience, I’ve spent many years taking photographs on both on my Canon DSLR and my iPhone 16 Pro. I’ve also had over a decade’s experience working in print publishing, working on layouts and doing post-production on images, which has given me a keen eye for printing errors and issues with image reproduction.
The webcam market has long been dominated by a few familiar names, with the Logitech C920 reigning supreme for years. However, the recent arrival of the Obsbot Meet SE signals a shift in the landscape. This compact powerhouse, priced at an incredibly competitive $69, delivers a level of performance and features that surpasses many of its rivals, including the venerable C920.
(Image credit: Future)The Obsbot Meet SE represents a significant leap forward in webcam technology. Its most striking feature is the exceptional image quality for the price. Colors appear remarkably accurate and vibrant, showcasing a great level of detail thanks to a 1.8 f-stop: the wider aperture allows for greater light capture, and Dual Native ISO with two separate ISO settings means the Meet SE can effectively minimize image noise and preserve detail in a wider range of lighting scenarios. This all results in brighter and more detailed images, even in challenging lighting conditions; particularly beneficial for streamers and content creators on a budget who may not have access to professional studio lighting.
Being able to fit all of this into such a small package is down to the stacked CMOS sensor. The stacked design allows for faster data processing and improved low-light performance, resulting in sharper images with reduced noise. Here's a side-by-side comparison of the Osbot Meet SE up against the Logitech C920, one of the best cheap webcams, and you can immediately see the difference in sharpness, quality, detail, and colour balance.
(Image credit: Future)The built-in microphones do the job, but I personally wouldn't rely on them too much. They're fine in a quiet room, but in a busy office they picked up a little too much background noise for my liking.
Beyond its impressive image quality, the Meet SE boasts a suite of features that set it apart from the competition. Setup is incredibly straightforward. Simply plug the camera in, and it's ready to use. The intuitive proprietary software provides easy access to adjust settings like exposure, contrast, and sharpness, allowing users to fine-tune the image to their preferences. To make the most of these, you’ll need to download the Obsbot app - an annoyance, I know, but I really would recommend it to make the most of this little powerhouse.
(Image credit: Future)In terms of the listed performance quality and features, you can capture smooth, fluid motion with 1080p at 100 frames per second or 720p at 150 frames per second. I personally found that 1080p at 60 fps is the sweet spot for this camera. The AI auto-framing feature ensures that you always remain in focus. I didn't think I moved around that much while on camera, but it's actually rather helpful.
Elsewhere, the gesture control feature that has become standard on Obsbot's cameras is here too, enabling hands-free operation - but I’d personally turn it off immediately, as anytime I waved my hands around on a call to illustrate what I was saying, the camera would start doing something I didn't want it to do. I understand the idea and how it could be useful for some users, but for me, it was just a frustration.
You can also seamlessly switch to vertical orientation either in the Obsbot app or by manually rotating the camera on the magnetic stand if you want to film yourself vertically. The final feature to discuss here is the 4X digital zoom, though I didn't really end up using this much; if I needed to show something, I would simply hold it up the camera, and the autofocus worked so well that zooming in felt unnecessary. Still, it's nice to have if you need it.
(Image credit: Future)The Obsbot Meet SE impresses not only with its performance but also with its sleek and compact design. The first thing that surprised me when I got it out of the box was how small it was. To give you an idea of just how small it is, here is a picture of it with an SD card for comparison.
(Image credit: Future)This size and its rectangular shape with rounded edges give it a really nice, cute design aesthetic, made even more evident with colors like the Aurora Green option. Obsbot also offers the Space Grey or Cloud White options for those of us who prefer a darker or cleaner look to our setup; the perfect way to have a solution for every buyer.
Its minimalist aesthetic is a welcome departure from the bulkier, more angular look of most of the best webcams. The inclusion of a magnetic mount adds a touch of convenience, allowing for easy placement and removal on various surfaces. However, this also means it can be knocked easily and isn’t as sturdy as a permanent mount. The mount itself can also be a bit fiddly to set up and feel a bit insecure, but it works fine once it's in place.
Obsbot Meet SE webcam: Price & availabilityPriced at $69 / £65 / AU$119, the Obsbot Meet SE offers exceptional value for the price. It significantly outperforms the similarly priced Logitech C920 in terms of image quality, features, and overall performance while remaining competitively priced.
There are some other great webcams out there around this price, but for my money, what helps to make the Obsbot Meet SE stand out is that it also looks great and comes in three color choices. This makes it an excellent choice for content creators and anyone seeking to enhance their video conferencing experience without breaking the bank while getting a nice-looking webcam at the same time.
Obsbot Meet SE webcam: Specs Should you buy the Obsbot Meet SE webcam? (Image credit: Future) Buy it if...You want a great cheap webcam
Despite its relatively low price, the Obsbot Meet SE has a lovely compact design and also delivers strong 1080p performance with a rich feature set.
You need a webcam to match your setup
With black, white, and pastel green colorways, the Meet SE is one of the very few good webcams on the market that offers a range of color customization options.
You want 4K video
The Meet SE is a fantastic webcam, but if you're a serious content creator who wants to record in 4K, you're going to need to pony up a bit more cash.
Logitech C920
The quintessential 1080p webcam. Logitech's C920 has been a reliable and sensibly priced choice of webcam for years, making it a good pick if you'd like to save some cash and don't need the fancy AI features found on the Obsbot Meet SE.
Read our full Logitech C920 review
Obsbot Tiny 2
If you're looking for a more premium webcam than the Meet SE, the Tiny 2 from Obsbot delivers 4K video along with AI-powered tracking via its mechanical gimbal mount. For those who want a high-end video experience, this is a great pick (though it's naturally more expensive than the Tiny SE).
Read our full Obsbot Tiny 2 review
How I tested the Obsbot Meet SE webcamI used the Obsbot Meet SE for video calls and general image quality testing, as well as trying it out with various lighting levels to see how well it performed. I also tried out the gesture controls, and did some side-by-side comparisons with other webcams that offer the same resolution.
The word itself predates Christianity, but the conclave with its secretive deliberations and ancient trappings still captures the public's curiosity.
(Image credit: Pool)
In some countries, including those facing national elections soon, political leaders who've advocated a homegrown style of MAGA are suddenly scrambling to distance themselves from the U.S. president.
(Image credit: Win McNamee)
Weinstein is facing sex crimes charges after his 2020 New York conviction was overturned last year. The #MeToo movement was catalyzed in part by the many women who came forward to accuse the disgraced producer of misconduct.
(Image credit: Michael Nagle)
With the U.S. now reporting more than 800 measles cases, a new poll from health policy research group KFF finds that many people are being exposed to false claims about measles and the measles vaccine.
(Image credit: wildpixel)
Frustrated with their party's response to President Trump, a wave of young Democrats are challenging incumbents in safe blue districts, hoping to mirror Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's upset win in 2018.
(Image credit: Saikat Chakrabarti, Kat Abughazaleh, Elijah Manley)
Pope Francis' body lies in state for public viewing at St. Peter's Basilica as the Vatican prepares for his funeral on Saturday.
(Image credit: Markus Schreiber)
This review first appeared in issue 343 of PC Pro.
While the KW 9100 Slim will never be the subject of yearnful second glances, there’s something cute about the KW 9200 Mini. Perhaps it’s the red detailing around the keys, perhaps the subtle way the Cherry logo sits atop the spacebar, but ultimately it boils down to size. You just want to pick it up and pop it in your bag, so it’s handy that it ships with a fabric carry case for protection during travels.
Not that you need have any worries it will fall apart, as Cherry’s robust build quality is once again evident. There’s a solid metal frame within and durable ABS plastic without, with a two-year warranty and the same claim of ten million activations for each key as the 9100 Slim.
Both boards use Cherry’s SX scissor keys, which are low profile but deliver a satisfying typing action. You can lift the rear with the retractable feet, and again these feel built to last. My biggest adjustment was getting used to the width of the keyboard, but that’s psychological – the active area is identical to a full-size keyboard. The only sacrifice is that the cursor keys eat into the main body, shortening the spacebar in the process.
You also lose out on dedicated shortcut buttons, so the FN key below Enter is pivotal to advanced operations. You’ll need to press this together with F1, F2 and F3 to choose between your three possible connections: 2.4GHz RF via the USB receiver, which cleverly tucks into a slot at the rear of the keyboard, or two Bluetooth partners.
It charges via USB-C, with no backlight to drain the batteries, but that lack of illumination could be a problem when travelling. This is one of the advantages of the Logitech MX Keys Mini. At least there are LED indicators on the first four function keys (for example, to show which Bluetooth connection has become active) and a smart red LED when Caps lock is on. Unlike its rival it doesn’t support multiple OSes, only Windows.
The KW 9200 Mini isn’t cheap, but it’s cheaper, lighter and slimmer than the MX Keys Mini and – as with the KW 9100 Slim – feels like it should last for years. It would make an excellent companion for business trips.
This review first appeared in issue 343 of PC Pro.
Cherry is well known within the gaming community for its mechanical keyboard switches, but any long-time reader will associate the German brand with high-quality keyboards as well. Perhaps, I might dare to venture, keyboards that lean towards the ugly.
Not so the KW9100 Slim. While its square edges, square keys and plain black finish won’t appeal to all, this wireless keyboard will lend any desk a smart, professional look. It’s a solid piece of equipment, and Cherry claims each key has a service life of 10 million actuations. I can’t imagine the key labels will last that long, but they should survive the two years of warranty.
The key action uses Cherry’s SX scissor switch, which is shallow but satisfying. I prefer the action of Logitech’s MX Keys, but the KW 9100 Slim is a fraction quieter. What you don’t get is the Logitech’s backlighting, with the only sign of light being indicators for the Num, Scroll and Caps lock keys.
The upside to this lack of illumination is battery life. I find myself recharging the MX Keys every week, but I suspect the KW 9100 Slim would keep going for a couple of months between charges. This is easy to do, with a USB-C port at the rear, next to a switch that allows you to flick between Bluetooth and the nano USB receiver supplied in the box (this model only supports Windows, but there is a Mac version).
Don’t immediately throw the box away, as hidden within is a magnetic foot that attaches to the rear of the keyboard. So if you like your keyboards to have a raised angle rather than lie entirely flat, you have the option. It snaps on with vigor, so I was never worried it might fall off as I shoved the keyboard around my desk.
There is nothing fancy about this keyboard. It doesn’t have the backlight of its Logitech rival, nor the ability to flick between Bluetooth partners at the press of a button, and its “extras” amount to shortcuts to the default web browser, the Windows calculator and volume controls (although you can program the keys using Cherry’s software). Its looks are equally subdued. But if you’re looking for a reliable, quiet keyboard for an office rollout or your own setup, it does the job and should last for years.
Police accused rebels of masterminding the attack, which sparked outrage and drew international condemnation, including from U.S. President Donald Trump.
(Image credit: Dar Yasin)