Feed aggregator

Enjoy fast and reliable mobile internet for less when you travel to Japan and use our code.

One of the advantages of having written about tech for as long as I have is that you start to notice when the same ideas come around decade after decade, in different shapes and sizes. Especially the bad ones.

12 years ago Google invented something called Google Glass — a set of glasses complete with a camera so you could record what you were looking at — and it was so roundly hated by everyone that we all breathed a collective sigh of relief when they went away.

But now it's 2026 and smart glasses are back, powered by AI, and tied in with a world-famous fashion brand, but fundamentally they still have exactly the same problem, which still hasn't been fixed: they enable people to record other people without their consent.

The problem is that none of this should have come as a surprise. The privacy risks of putting a camera on somebody's face weren't merely predictable — they were predicted. Women were raising concerns about men using Google Glass to record them more than a decade ago.

And yet here we are again.

The curious case of Google Glass

(Image credit: Shutterstock / Hattanas )

Let’s remind ourselves what happened the first time that smart glasses arrived.

Google Glass arrived in 2013. It puts a small heads-up display and camera on the wearer's face, allowing them to take photos and record video from their point of view. Almost immediately, privacy became one of the defining controversies around it.

By 2014, women were explicitly raising issues of abuse. Wired reported that women were particularly interested in technology that could detect and block Glass because of concerns about men covertly recording them in nightclubs. "Even if they didn’t know if the device was recording, they felt threatened by its presence", said Oliver, the creator of the detection device.

Google Glass wearers were being called “Glassholes,” businesses were banning the device, and Google itself was publishing etiquette guidance because of complaints about people creepily filming others without permission.

By 2015, consumer Glass effectively died. Privacy wasn't its only problem — its price, awkward appearance, and lack of compelling everyday uses all played a part — but by January 2015 Google had stopped selling the consumer Explorer Edition. Glass survived as an enterprise product before Google finally discontinued the Enterprise Edition in 2023.

Smart glasses didn’t die with Google Glass. They had simply retreated to a lab to lick their wounds and wait for that vital next piece of technology that would make them relevant again. That technology was AI. In 2023, AI-powered smart glasses, partnered with leading fashion brands, started to emerge, with Meta leading the charge with its Ray-Ban Meta glasses.

This time they looked much more like ordinary glasses. Meta had also found the compelling use cases that Google Glass struggled to provide: its glasses could use AI to answer questions about what you were looking at, give you directions, and translate signs and conversations. But they could also still record what, or more importantly, who, you were looking at without needing that person's consent.

It’s like women don’t exist

(Image credit: Shutterstock / Alexander Fedosov)

Frankly, I don’t think Meta should have released them with that ability, but here we are. It’s like we’ve learned nothing from the Google Glass debacle. Almost as soon as the next generation of smart glasses emerged they were being used to harass women and record them without their consent or knowledge.

Researchers at the University of Sydney have been studying hundreds of social-media videos involving smart glasses and found men using them to approach and record women without their knowledge, including at gyms, workplaces and beaches. Australia's eSafety Commissioner says the technology can amplify gendered harms because recording can be almost undetectable, and specifically highlights pickup-artist content in which women often don't know they're being filmed.

The researchers analysed 350 publicly available Instagram videos from 2023–2026. In a subset of covert POV videos, around 60% of interactions were classified as potential harassment. And in about 43% of the videos, women were subjected to further abusive online commentary, sometimes exposing personal information.

These are real victims. CBS interviewed a woman who discovered she'd been secretly recorded only after the resulting video went viral, attracting more than 200,000 views. Her reaction said it all: “I had no say.”

And France has now opened an investigation involving alleged sexual harassment and discreet smart-glasses recording.

I don't think these products were designed to harm women. That's almost the point. Too often, the technology industry seems to design products around what the person using them can do, without giving enough consideration to the person standing on the other side of the technology. And when the potential for abuse disproportionately affects women, that's a particularly serious blind spot. Women have historically been underrepresented in the data and testing used for product design, with designers still describing the male body as the implicit default.

Meta clearly did think about privacy. The glasses have a recording LED specifically designed to tell people nearby when the camera is being used. But if your safeguard against covert recording is a tiny light on the front of the glasses — one that people have found ways to conceal or disable — is that really enough?

Did it consider what happens when a man wearing an almost invisible camera approaches a woman who's alone?

Meta's audio-only smart glasses

Meta Ray-Ban Audio smart glasses. (Image credit: Meta)

Yesterday at Meta Connect, Meta announced a new version of its smart glasses called the Ray-Ban Meta Audio glasses, which don’t have a camera. They got barely a mention in Zuckerberg’s keynote, but I wonder if they were released because of the existential threat to its business that the now commonly used “perv glasses” moniker poses.

Ray-Ban Meta Audio has no camera. You can still listen to music, make calls, translate conversations, and talk to Meta's AI, but the person sitting opposite you no longer needs to wonder whether they're being secretly recorded.

Meta hasn't said the Audio glasses exist because of the privacy backlash, and removing the camera inevitably removes some genuinely useful features too. For visually impaired people in particular, a camera combined with AI can be transformative.

But Ray-Ban Meta Audio proves something important: smart glasses don't have to contain a camera.

Twelve years ago, women were already warning that putting inconspicuous cameras on people's faces could enable men to record them without their knowledge, and today researchers are documenting precisely that behavior.

Google Glass users became known as “Glassholes” because people hated that the person they were talking to was recording them. Twelve years later, we're having the same argument about “perv glasses.”

That's what makes me angry. This wasn't an unforeseeable consequence of some revolutionary new technology. We'd already run this experiment and realized that these should never have got out of the lab in the first place.

• Adobe Premiere is now free on Android, following its earlier roll-out to iPhone
• Premiere offers everything you can get on Canva, and more, without the subscription fees
• Compatible with Android 13 and later and requiring 5GB of RAM, it is unlikely to run on most Chromebooks, and is without advanced desktop features

Adobe has launched its flagship Adobe Premiere software as a mobile app on Android, and has made it free to use. After its previous release on iPhone in 2025, the stripped down take on Premiere has proved to be a smart move from Adobe, attracting users away from upstart competitor Canva.

Like Canva, Adobe Premiere for mobile has AI features. While free to download and use the app, you’ll still need to pay for the AI credits to use those features, but this will likely prove more affordable than the monthly plan of the desktop version.

A standard Adobe Premiere Pro subscription on desktop will typically cost £21.98/$22.99 a month with an annual plan, which makes the new Adobe Premiere for Android an attractive option if you don’t need the full set of features. There’s a bonus, too: if you use a modern Chromebook with Google Play installed, you should be able to use this version of Adobe Premiere.

Is it really Adobe Premiere?

While Adobe Premiere Rush is already available on Android, this is a pretty basic take on the video editing tools now in demand by content creators. This new free Adobe Premiere – which doesn’t have the same features as the desktop original – is a more accomplished version than Adobe Premiere Rush, with multi-track timeline, audio enhancements, 4K video, and more.

Adobe is generally better value than Canva, and the company’s decision to release feature-packed mobile versions of Adobe Premiere on iPhone and now Android underlines how seriously it takes the competition. While Adobe has a massive market share in the creative software market, Canva’s small 4% is backed by a more active user base.

(Image credit: Future)

Both tools offer creative AI, but Adobe has a legacy of providing audio and video editing software. The free Adobe Premiere app offers access to the Adobe Stock and support for creator assets, too – and unlike Canva, doesn’t demand a login to start using it.

Free Adobe tools on Android

To install Adobe Premiere on Android, you’ll need Android 13 or later, with 5GB of RAM. The first release has a download of just under 60MB, and Firefly-powered generative AI features will require an active internet connection. Modern Chromebooks with over 4GB of RAM should be able to run the software, although there is every chance that Adobe removes that option.

Other Adobe tools are also available on Android. Aside from Adobe Premiere Rush (which would seem to be heading to retirement), Adobe Lightroom Mobile, Adobe Photoshop Express, and Adobe Express are among the most popular, offering mobile takes on the desktop Photoshop experience. These also provide an alternative to Canva’s monthly subscription, and again are free to use but have some paid features.

Meta says the keychain will be ready to ship by the holiday season, like some kind of bizarre AI stocking stuffer.

Despite lower poverty overall, the rate for seniors has been steadily rising in recent years. A new AARP survey sheds light on how those over 50 are struggling in the crucial time before retirement.

(Image credit: Eva Marie Uzcategui)

• OpenAI has filed court documents against Elon Musk’s xAI
• The papers reveal that ChatGPT’s integration with Siri was disappointing
• OpenAI alleges that barely anyone was using Apple Intelligence

If you’ve noticed an improvement in Siri’s abilities on your Apple device, you might have Google to thank for that, as its Gemini artificial intelligence (AI) now powers much of what Siri AI can do. Rival services like ChatGPT have also found their way into iOS — but new court documents reveal why that particular partnership has struggled to get off the ground.

The court filings were made in relation to OpenAI’s ongoing dispute with Elon Musk’s rival xAI firm (now known as SpaceXAI). In the documents, OpenAI alleges that, by the time xAI filed its complaint against OpenAI, “it was clear that Apple’s integration of ChatGPT was dramatically underperforming.”

The papers then go on to imply that this was not just some one-off failure. Instead, the Apple integration was “persistently underperforming,” OpenAI alleges.

Apple added ChatGPT integration to Siri in December 2024, but this required a multi-step opt-in process. That could be one reason for the substandard performance of the link-up, with a degree of friction slowing users down in their attempts to harness OpenAI’s tool.

Much of this section of the court filings is redacted, so it’s difficult to know exactly what was going on between Apple and OpenAI. But it seems clear that, at least from the latter’s perspective, the results were severely underwhelming.

What might have been

(Image credit: Getty Images)

When Apple Intelligence first launched, Apple provided users with an option to tap into ChatGPT if they needed something a little more powerful. For example, this was an option in Visual Intelligence, providing extra context and help with the images you shot with your iPhone’s camera.

Yet OpenAI’s legal filing makes it clear that barely anyone was using any of ChatGPT’s tie-ins with Apple Intelligence. OpenAI describes the effect the integration had on competitors (like xAI) as being “indisputably de minimis.” It added that its own expert, Dr. Catherine Tucker, calculated “the share of GenAI consumers who accessed ChatGPT through Apple Intelligence” and found it to be “consistent with OpenAI’s internal view that Apple Intelligence saw minimal usage.”

That hints that the problem might not have just been limited to ChatGPT’s integration with Apple devices, but with Apple Intelligence as a whole. Apple’s AI system was woefully underdone when it first arrived and clearly lagged behind its rivals. First impressions matter, and if most people were left unconvinced by Apple Intelligence, ChatGPT might have suffered the knock-on effects among Apple’s customers.

Did ChatGPT lose out because Apple fans had to dive into the Settings app on their device, find the relevant section and laboriously wade through several steps in order to enable ChatGPT? Because Siri’s limitations dragged ChatGPT down with it? Or did users simply prefer to launch ChatGPT’s standalone app instead?

We don’t know the answer to that, at least not right now. But with Siri getting a glow-up under the Siri AI banner, it feels clear to me that Apple wants a fresh start for its AI efforts. Maybe things would have been different for OpenAI had it integrated with the more powerful Siri AI rather than the underbaked Apple Intelligence. But with Siri AI righting many of the wrongs of Apple Intelligence’s fudged launch, OpenAI may be left ruing what might have been.

• Gambit researchers uncovered ongoing AI‑driven skimming campaign stealing 600,000+ payment records since July 2026
• Attackers used three autonomous harnesses (Strix, Cairn, Hermes) to compromise dozens of retail sites cheaply
• Victims include major US firms; campaign shows AI enables faster, persistent, low‑cost cyberattacks at scale

In July 2026, a hacker tasked autonomous AI agents to attack retail organizations around the world, deploy credit card skimmers, and steal payment data.

Since then, the bots launched hundreds of attack projects, compromised dozens of organizations, and stole at least 600,000 payment records - and to make matters worse, the campaign is still live, attacking and breaking into websites as we speak.

All of this was reported by security researchers Gambit, who said they managed to recover the operator’s staging server and through it - reconstruct the ongoing campaign. They also saw the skimmers live on victim websites, and sifted through logs and AI claims found on the attacker’s server. In just five days, between September 10 and 15, the agents made 105 attack waves and compromised 27 organizations “to varying degrees.”

Among the victims are a Fortune 500 hospitality company, a “major” US airline, a large private US industrial supplies distributor, and a US online fashion retailer. One of the AI tools would use a website ranking service to produce a list of potential targets, focusing primarily on those running custom-built software.

A fistful of dollars

But the victims are not the “interesting” part of this story - the attackers are. Gambit believes they are financially motivated Chinese threat actors. They are using three AI “harnesses” (frameworks, essentially), which can run almost the entire attack chain autonomously, striking around 10 companies a day, for a handful of dollars per company.

In four weeks, the attackers spent around $7,000, meaning that their entire cost for the operation so far was no more than $18,000. Breaking it down, it means that the attacker spent around $25 per target.

“Spread over the companies attacked, this is a marginal cost of a few US dollars to a few tens of US dollars for each targeted company,” Gambit’s researchers said. “The operator’s own cost review gives a similar figure, a mean of $25.46 over 101 completed scans, from $3.13 for the cheapest target to $79.31 for the most expensive.”

“Where access was achieved, it usually took less than a day, and in many cases just a few hours. We also detected instructions in the attacker’s playbook that could disrupt the operations of a company as a result of data deletion or cleanup procedures run by the agent - and this has indeed happened in some of the breaches,” Gambit said.

The three harnesses

The three harnesses are called Strix, Cairn, and Hermes.

Gambit describes Hermes as an open source autonomous AI agent with a persistent memory, skills that the agent wrote and edited itself, a searchable archive of past sessions, scheduled jobs, and a web console. On the staging server the researchers analyzed, it loaded a Chinese system persona called “SOUL - Red Team Operator”, which contained 121 skills (78 attack skills).

“Hermes is the operator’s console for orchestrating the activity and for direct hacking activities,” Gambit explained. “It used Anthropic’s opus-4.6 (after newer models refused its requests), with 1,951 prompts typed by the human across 260 sessions - only a few prompts per target. The human prompts are short instructions in Chinese, usually launching an attack, tasking the agent with a general next step, or what to do next after achieving access.”

Strix is an open-source AI pentest tool, while Cairn is an autonomous pentest engine. It receives target domains and an objective, such as to get a shell or admin access, then runs for hours until it achieves the objective, times out, or is stopped. Cairn used DeepSeek v4.1 Flash, it was said.

Gambit’s researchers seem to be rather impressed with the campaign. They described it as very low cost, with a level of patience, persistence, and creativity that most human attackers would be “unlikely to sustain”, managing to achieve “far greater results, far faster.”

They have also called to arms, urging organizations to “adapt to a reality where attacks are significantly faster and more comprehensive.” To do that, they must adopt a resilience-first mentality and deploy a security stack that can match the AI on speed.

Many of the affected organizations were notified, and the skimmers were removed, they said.

On Thursday, the two leaders will hold meetings where Trump and Xi are expected to talk about artificial intelligence, rare earths, trade and geopolitics such as Iran and Taiwan.

(Image credit: Andrew Caballero-Reynolds)

On Thursday, the two leaders will hold meetings where Trump and Xi are expected to talk about artificial intelligence, rare earths, trade and geopolitics such as Iran and Taiwan.

(Image credit: Chip Somodevilla)

• Rainbow Six Tactics game director Martial Potron says making the spin-off a turn-based tactics game felt like "a natural fit"
• He explains that the "DNA" of the shooter series is tactical
• Potron adds that the team already had experience with turn-based games, but "had to convince Ubisoft and the Rainbow Six team"

Rainbow Six Tactics game director Martial Potron has explained why Ubisoft chose to make the upcoming spin-off a turn-based tactics game instead of keeping in line with the series' first-person style.

Speaking in an interview with TechRadar Gaming, Potron said making the next Rainbow Six Siege game turn-based, in the same vein as XCOM, felt like "a natural fit" for the development team.

"When you look at Rainbow Six, its DNA is tactical," he said. "It's just that it's first-person. The camera is placed in the eyes of the players. It's a real-time game. But if you look at all the DNA, finding the best line of sight, finding the best cover, finding the best targets, taking care of your operators, destruction... In fact, it's very tactical in a sense."

He continued, saying that when designing video games, you always imagine the "what-ifs" of whatever project you're working on, and reiterated that the idea of making a tactical Rainbow Six game "was so natural; the fact that we wanted to do that."

"It happened that in [Ubisoft] Paris we have experience with tactical shooters, but we have experience with tactical turn-based games with Mario + Rabbids, and we love tactical shooters and tactical turn-based games," Potron added.

"So in fact, it became a natural fit for the team and for the genre to try to do that, and we just had to convince Ubisoft and the Rainbow Six team."

Rainbow Six Tactics launches in 2027 for PC, PS5, Xbox Series X, and Xbox Series S.

• Diablo 4 game director Brent Gibson says, "it's about damn time" the game comes to Nintendo Switch 2
• He says there were moments when the team thought it "impossible," but they managed to overcome the issues
• Gibson admits there are some "concessions," but they're barely noticeable is very happy with the result

Diablo 4 is finally available on the Nintendo Switch 2, and while porting the game to the handheld console came with some hurdles, game director Brent Gibson is quite pleased with it.

"First off, it's about damn time," Gibson said during a press Q&A at BlizzCon that TechRadar Gaming attended. "We've wanted it on the Switch for a very long time. It's a big game. I think we've had moments where [we thought] it's impossible. There's no way we could do it. But the team that took that on? Boy, did they do an amazing job."

Gibson went on to explain how the team optimized the game for handheld, admitting that there were some issues it had to work around, but overall the team delivered, and it was worth the wait.

"The concessions we had to make are barely noticeable. I'm so impressed," he said. "There are some things that we have to do for performance, obviously, but I think the expectation once you're going to handheld, we nailed it; it's locked.

"It's fluid. It's easily readable. I love the Switch's screen, and so it pops very nicely on that screen. It was challenging. But ultimately, I think it was worth the wait for how much work we had to put into getting it in there."

Blizzard just kicked off Diablo 4 - Season of Hell's Legacy, the game's 15th season, which arrived on September 15. Fans can also look forward to Diablo 5, which is slated to launch in 2029.

However, Gibson has put concerns to rest and stated outright that Diablo 4 players don't need to worry about the game's future because of Diablo 5's announcement.

"If you're wearing the sign in the middle of Times Square that says 'The End is Nigh', the end is not nigh," he said. "We have a lot coming."

The Nintendo Switch 2 has had a chaotic time since launch, with the risk of tariffs and price hikes threatening to increase the cost of the console far above its original launch price. However, thanks to a brand-new price cut — and one excellent value bundle deal — it's now the best time to pick up the console ever.

You'll want to take yourself over to Argos, where you can save £65 on the Nintendo Switch 2 and add a game of your choice for £20 — for a total spend of £374.99. Available titles are not the usual garbage we see with these offers, too, as there are some excellent options to choose from, including Cyberpunk 2077, Metroid Prime 4, Pokémon Pokopia, or Star Fox.

Considering the Switch 2 is £419.99 at full price, and depending on the game you choose, that means the total potential savings are up to £112. I'd say Pokémon Pokopia is the frontrunner here, not simply in terms of value for money alone, but also because it's one of the console's best exclusive games.

No matter which game you pick, altogether, this is the sort of discount I never imagined we'd see on the console this early.

Today's best Nintendo Switch 2 deals

Switch 2 + 1 game for £20: was £486.98 now £374.99
Deals on the Nintendo Switch 2 have disappeared recently, but here's a chance to get it at the best price in months, as it drops to £354.99. You can also throw in a game for £20, including big hitters like Cyberpunk 2077, Metroid Prime 4, Pokémon Pokopia, or Star Fox. Any one of those will be a great way to start your collection.View Deal

Smyths Toys doesn't have bundle deals as good as the ones above, but you can also pick up the Nintendo Switch 2 by itself at the discounted price at the retailer. There is an offer to pick up a PowerA Slim Case for £10 when you buy the console as well, which is a cheap bonus item, but I'd recommend any of those £20 games at Argos over this useful but not essential accessory.View Deal

Is there a reason for this surprise discount? Well, I believe that it's at least partly due to a recent EU ruling that means the Switch 2 must comply with new battery regulations. The current version of the console doesn't, and so a new revision is set to become available this autumn, featuring a user-replaceable battery.

Nintendo has made it clear that there is "no difference in functionality between current products and revised products containing user-replaceable batteries," so you're not getting an inferior console when buying this current version. It plays all the same games and offers no performance differences.

With that in mind, I think this offer is going to be very difficult to beat, even with Amazon's Prime Big Deal Days coming in October and Black Friday in November. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if the retailer is saving its current stock for next month's sale before launching a similar offer itself.

There's reason to wait, though, while the current Argos deal offers so much value.

• A bug in Windows 11's September update broke File History
• Microsoft admitted the backup feature was scuppered and has apparently now fixed it
• However, the cure is in an optional update, so it might be best to wait for the full release of the upgrade next month

Microsoft has admitted that Windows 11 has a bug that messes up a backup feature in the OS, although a new optional update fixes it (but not quite fully).

Windows Latest reports what's been a slightly odd tale in that the bug in File History has been kicking about since the September update first emerged over two weeks ago, but Microsoft didn't acknowledge it — even though it was a widely reported issue.

File History is a feature that enables you to keep files backed up to an external drive, and while it doesn't see a whole lot of use these days, it's obviously important for those who do still avail themselves of the functionality.

Microsoft informed Windows Latest that: "After installing the September 2026 Windows security update KB5124008, some customers using File History, might be unable to create or update backups. File History is used to back up files to an external drive or network location."

The good news here is that the latest September update, which is optional — it's a preview of the October update in fact — does fix this bug, as confirmed by Windows Latest, but it seemingly doesn't fully iron out every issue with File History.

Windows Latest noticed a post on Microsoft's Learn portal from a user who confirms that the new September preview update does mean that File History is working again and making backups, but there still appears to be an issue with the 'Run now' ability and problems with synchronization of save times therein.

However, this isn't a bug caused by Microsoft's recent work on Windows 11, and in fact this glitch dates back to a Windows 11 update in July 2026.

Analysis: update skeptics

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

At least File History appears to be cured of this latest feature-breaking bug, and hopefully the other problem highlighted on Reddit will be fixed before too long.

You don't necessarily want to download an optional update, of course, as it may bring in other bugs — after all, it's still a beta. The safest bet is to wait for the October update to arrive in two and a half weeks (on October 13) and then install that as the remedy for your File History blues (while temporarily keeping backups a different way, manually or on OneDrive, in the meantime).

Windows 11 bugs have remained a problem throughout 2026, and every year before for that matter (particularly with the 24H2 release). Microsoft still needs to do better in this regard considering this is one of the thornier issues that has continually dogged its OS, which it's busy fixing this year.

The trouble with the long-running overly buggy nature of Windows 11 is that it's making some users hold off updating the OS, and I don't mean for just a week or two. (I'd advise a week's breathing room in general myself, just to see if there are any major bugs or nasty showstoppers with any given update).

For example, this Redditor notes: "I am once again advising everyone to disable Windows updates. Let people test the bugs for a few months, then update. Your PC isn't gonna implode because you are 3 months behind on Windows 11 versions."

This was in reply to a comment which simply asked: "Is there a Windows 11 core feature that hasn't been broken at least twice since release?"

Cynicism prevails around Windows 11 updates in many corners of the web these days, and I think this is something Microsoft needs to act on. Yes, Windows is a very complex operating system that needs to cope with umpteen PC and device configurations, and a labyrinth of legacy features that must be maintained for a niche set of customers, but still — that's ultimately not an excuse.

Something needs to be done to improve QA and testing, otherwise it's going to be difficult to declare that 'Windows 11 is fixed' next year, which is Microsoft's goal (presumably).

I don’t know about you, but with every other ad being for some sports betting or prediction market platform, and every other app store game looking to cram in some kind of gacha system, I’m plenty sick enough of the 'gamblification' creeping into our daily lives.

At the same time, I kinda love Meta’s new blind box Meta Glasses with BlackPink and White Lotus star Lisa.

Call me a hypocrite, but the design collaboration is frankly genius, and while it isn’t for me (nor something I want to be bombarded with), as a one-off experiment, it feels set to be a runaway success.

@techradar

Are you ready to drop some money on the Meta Glasses Lisa Edition? ✨

♬ original sound - TechRadar

To catch you up to speed, alongside its new Meta VR Glasses, Ray-Ban Meta Gen 3 smart specs, and its first-ever cameraless glasses in the Ray-Ban Meta Audio glasses, we were also treated to a new Meta Glasses style at Meta Connect 2026.

The Meta Glasses are Meta’s own-brand smart specs. It still works with EssilorLuxottica experts on the designs, but they aren’t branded as such — making them more accessible as they don’t carry the same price premium a named brand would.

It’s also where Meta has debuted collab designs with celebrities. It kicked things off with Kylie Jenner with the Meta Starfire Kylie Edition shape — they’re much more rounded than anything Meta has released before, though the name always makes me think of the Australian pop singer — and has now announced a partnership with Lisa.

The specs of the Meta Glasses haven’t changed here. They still boast a 12MP ultra-wide camera with a 3K recording resolution, a battery life Meta rates at over eight hours, plus open-ear speakers for listening to music and six microphones for recording audio and taking calls.

(Image credit: Meta / Lisa)

Lisa’s glasses differ entirely due to their design. They come with black and pink lens and frame options (clearly inspired by Lisa’s world-famous K-pop group), and Lisa’s star icon on each stem tip.

Importantly, each pair also comes with a random charm — one of 12, two of which are extra rare — of cute dogs cast in different poses and colors. They’re inspired by Lisa’s well-documented love of her pets and blind boxes — herein lies why I love Meta’s approach to add a random element to its specs.

Collaborative designs that incorporate some aspect of the celebrity’s persona are always appreciated by the fans, and Lisa has expressed so much love for random blind boxes that their inclusion here feels like a slam dunk.

Plus, while some charms are a bit more special than others, I personally love all 12, and they’re such a small aspect (and similar enough) that I don’t see anyone being truly devastated whichever one they get — nor needing to seek out all 12 by buying up as many Meta Glasses as possible.

Meta / LisaMeta / LisaMeta / Lisa

Of course, I expect some new TikTok series will launch where an influencer with money to burn does attempt to open all 12, but outside of a few obsessed edge cases, I see this as a delightful expression of Lisa

If you want to get in on the Meta Glasses Lisa edition randomness, the new specs start at $339 (UK and Australian pricing TBC).

@techradar

♬ original sound - TechRadar

Commentary: After getting hands-on time with Apple’s new foldable phone, here are the questions I’m most eager to answer in testing.

• Amazon is re-hiring former workers back into AI and cloud roles
• The company is investigating the impacts of its office-working mandates
• Despite 30,000 layoffs in the past year, Amazon continues to hire for certain roles

Amazon is reportedly trying to re-hire old workers, including many who were affected by previous rounds of layoffs.

Recruiter emails cited by Business Insider reveal that rather than filling roles that have emerged following layoffs, the company is actually targeting specific ex-workers it seems, with the company's cloud computing business predominantly seeing these hiring efforts.

AWS, cloud computing, AI, ML and agentic AI are apparently the focus of these efforts, with one recruiter reportedly referring to the scheme as 'Swami's Boomerang Reengagement Initiative' – Swami Sivasubramanian is a VP for AWS Agentic AI.

Amazon is re-hiring ex-workers back into the company

The company is also said to be making it easier for former employees to return, offering shortened interview processes that may skip over some of the screening steps that aren't all that necessary.

Besides trying to attract former talent, Business Insider also reports that Amazon is digging deeper into why they left, and the potential impacts of its return-to-office (RTO) mandates. Specifically, the tech giant wants to know whether the RTO changes were behind some ex-workers' departures.

While company spokesperson Haley Silva told the publication that Amazon isn't specifically targeting people who left because of the RTO and that its in-office expectations haven't changed, it's an interesting perspective from a company that went pretty much all-in on the RTO years ago in a bid to drive more in-person collaboration and to boost productivity.

All of this comes in the wake of major ongoing layoffs – the company fired around 30,000 workers just in the past year. But it's apparently all part of a broader shift in focus, because instead of cutting headcount as aggressively as that 30k figure suggests, Amazon's more likely looking to lose workers in certain areas of the business and gain workers in more important areas.

A judge has ordered that the Trump administration restore journalists' access to White House. And, Tucker Carlson sits down with Morning Edition's Steve Inskeep for a Newsmakers interview.

(Image credit: Alex Wroblewski)

• A regular leaker says the chips for the PS6 and Xbox Helix have been 'taped out', meaning the design is final for manufacturing
• The leaker claims 56 TFLOPS of power for the Xbox Helix and 40 TFLOPS for the PS6
• That compared to 16.7 TFLOPS on the PS5 Pro and 12 TFLOPS on the Xbox Series X

The launches of next-gen console hardware from Sony and Microsoft are edging ever closer, and the latest rumor doing the rounds suggests that the chips for both the PlayStation 6 and what's being called the Xbox Helix are now 'taped out' — as in, finalized for submission to chip manufacturers.

This comes from well-known tipster KeplerL2 (via VideoCardz), who also predicts 40 TFLOPS of performance for the Sony hardware and 56 TFLOPS for the Microsoft hardware. That's Tera Floating-Point Operations Per Second, or how many trillions of calculations a processor can do in a single single.

While TFLOPS gives us some indication of how powerful these consoles will be, they're not the whole story, as architecture choices and memory bandwidth will play significant roles too. That said, it seems the Xbox console may have a major edge in terms of raw power — although the Xbox Series X had a 20% edge on TFLOPS over the PS5 back in 2020 too, which didn't necessarily translate into better-looking games.

Direct comparisons with current generation consoles are tricky, as so many other variables will be changing as well as TFLOPS figures, but TweakTown reports that the PS5 delivers 10.28 TFLOPS, the PS5 Pro offers 16.7 TFLOPS (typical) and 18.05 TFLOPS (peak), and the Xbox Series X can hit 12 TFLOPS.

But how much will it cost?How are PS6 and Xbox Helix shaping up to be such spec monsters? Is RDNA 5 really that big of an architectural leap? from r/hardware

Both the Xbox Helix and the PlayStation 6 are expected to be based on the AMD Zen 6 family of CPUs and the AMD RDNA 5 GPU architecture, if previous leaks are to be believed, and there has been talk of 30GB of RAM being packed inside the Sony console (no RAM predictions yet for the Microsoft one).

Judging by the ongoing discussion on Reddit, gamers aren't placing too much stock in these leaked TFLOPS numbers, as they aren't guaranteed to convert directly into gaming performance. The bigger debate seems to be over how much Sony and Microsoft are going to charge for these next-generation machines.

There are mentions of "an inevitably massive price hike" while another user is prepared to "say goodbye to affordable console hardware" in this generation. As we've already seen with the Steam Machine, the ongoing shortage of memory chips is driving up prices across the board, including in gaming hardware.

As for when we might actually see these consoles, don't hold your breath: experts say a launch before 2028 is unlikely, even if the design for the main processor chips have now been finalized. We'll just have to fill the time exploring everything Grand Theft Auto 6 has to offer in the meantime.

For decades, banking technology has been built around a simple sequence: a person makes a financial decision and the bank’s technology processes it. A customer decides to open an account, move money into savings or apply for a loan, and the bank’s systems execute that instruction.

Artificial intelligence can potentially reverse that sequence. Instead of waiting for a human to specify an action, AI can interpret the person’s goals, understand the financial context around that goal, and determine what happens next. It could recognize that a customer is likely to face a cash shortfall, identify the available ways to address it, and potentially execute the appropriate action.

McKinsey estimates that generative AI could create $200 billion to $340 billion in annual value for the banking industry. Yet much of the industry is adding AI to systems designed for the old model, not rebuilding the model around AI.

The problem is that AI inherits the same product silos and process boundaries. Banks gain another layer of technology, but not the cross-system decision-making needed to realize AI’s full potential.

The first wave is still about better processes

The most visible applications of AI in banking are often the easiest ones to deploy. Banks are using AI tools to improve customer service, automate fraud detection, personalize recommendations, summarize documents and accelerate credit decisions. Lloyds Banking Group, for example, says more than 50 AI use cases were rolled out across the group in 2025, generating around £50 million in value, with more than £100 million in additional value expected in 2026.

McKinsey has made a similar observation based on the industry's experience with generative AI. Simply adding AI on top of existing processes will not produce transformational change and can instead create another layer of technical debt.

The difference between an AI-native architecture and a chatbot attached to an existing system can be tested with three questions.

• Is the AI following a fixed sequence of instructions, or can it choose and coordinate actions within a defined system of guardrails, trusted data sources and approved tools?
• Is the process designed for the agent to act, with human review and every decision recorded for analysis?
• And are permissions, monitoring and regulatory controls built into the workflow, particularly for critical functions such as compliance and fraud prevention?

If the answer is no, the company has added an AI interface without redesigning the underlying process.

From products to outcomes

The more significant transformation begins when the bank starts with the customer’s objective, not with the banking product.

Consider a customer who wants to maintain a certain level of liquidity while earning as much as possible on excess cash. An intelligent banking system could continuously monitor their balance, upcoming payments, income, available credit and other relevant information, then determine whether money should remain liquid, be invested elsewhere or be used to reduce borrowing.

While the system can continue making decisions as the customer’s circumstances change, that does not require customers to surrender control immediately. Adoption can begin with low-risk actions, such as moving excess cash into savings or setting aside VAT for future tax payments, before expanding into more consequential decisions.

This is already beginning to appear in financial institutions, although mostly in bounded applications. Deutsche Bank, for example, has deployed an agentic AI system for third-party risk management in which several AI agents retrieve relevant controls, analyze supporting documentation, and propose assessment outcomes. Human assessors remain responsible for reviewing or overriding those recommendations.

Like a new employee, an AI agent should receive defined permissions. Transparent activity logs, alerts, approval thresholds and the ability to override decisions would make that principle visible in the product and enforceable by regulators.

The bank becomes a continuous decision system

Under this premise, the bank becomes an intelligent execution layer that continuously manages financial activity to accomplish a defined objective.

This shifting structure is also visible outside traditional banking. Visa and Mastercard are both building infrastructure for AI-initiated payments, allowing agents to act on behalf of consumers and businesses. Visa Intelligent Commerce is designed to let AI agents find and purchase products on a user’s behalf, with tokenized credentials, authentication and spending controls built into the payment flow.

As agents move from recommending actions to executing them, banks will need to ensure transactions remain within the customer’s intent and risk tolerance. The institution remains responsible for keeping the agent within those limits.

The architecture has to change with the AI

Deloitte found that integration with existing systems and tools is the top modernization challenge for 77 percent of banking executives deploying AI, ahead of security, compliance and cloud interoperability concerns.

Traditional banking systems separate payments, lending, accounts and compliance across different applications. AI agents need to work across those boundaries, combining data and actions from several systems to make a single decision.

Banks therefore need an orchestration layer that allows AI to access those systems without requiring another custom integration for every use case. The core platforms can remain systems of record, while more of the decision-making happens above them.

This gives AI-forward fintechs such as Revolut or Ramp, as well as new entrants designing their infrastructure from scratch, an advantage over institutions that must retrofit deeply embedded systems. If regulation remains broadly unchanged, the first major financial institution built around continuous decision-making could emerge within five years.

It may not be a bank in the strict regulatory sense, but it could perform an increasing share of a bank’s functions, allowing customers to manage their finances.

To thrive, I believe banks need to become institutions organized to make continuous decisions for the customer’s benefit, not simply to follow instructions. And when it comes to AI, they must stop treating it as a fancy tool to add and start treating it as something to build around.

We've featured the best business intelligence platform.

This article was produced as part of TechRadar Pro Perspectives, our channel to feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today.

The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/pro/perspectives-how-to-submit

It’s not all about the latest camera gear – the astronauts relied on both old and new tech that anyone can buy off-the-shelf.