Reviews

Light spoilers follow for all eight episodes of Daredevil: Born Again season 2.

Daredevil: Born Again season 2 represents another opportunity for the Marvel TV show to be, well, reborn.

With its predecessor having been subjected to a creative overhaul midway through production, Born Again's debut season was the embodiment of the saying "too many cooks spoil the soup". This time, though, the show's cast and crew are all singing from the same hymn sheet — and Marvel fans won't accept any excuses if its new chapter similarly turns out to be a Frankenstein's Monster of a season.

Having watched all eight episodes, it gives me great pleasure to say that Born Again season 2 is devilishly great — but, haunted by the ghosts of its past, it's not the knock-out masterpiece that some might be hoping for.

Hell on Earth

Half a year has passed since Born Again's season 1 finale (Image credit: Marvel Television/Disney+)

Six months on from Daredevil: Born Again's season 1 finale, Matt Murdock (Charlie Cox) and his allies are engaged in a guerrilla war against Wilson Fisk/Kingpin (Vincent D'Onofrio), the dictatorial Mayor of New York City and Murdock's long-time nemesis.

Born Again season 2 is as bone-crunchingly brilliant as its forebear and Netflix's Daredevil TV series

Fisk's calculated crackdown on vigilantes like Daredevil has not only continued apace, but has also been used a smokescreen to Fisk's other criminal activities. However, when our eponymous hero and right-hand Karen Page (Deborah Ann Woll) learn of — and disrupt — a multi-million dollar arms shipment on the Hudson River, the stakes of this cat-and-mouse game grow in dramatic and violent fashion.

A show renowned for its brutality, season 2 is as bone-crunchingly brilliant as its both forebear and Netflix's Daredevil TV series that Born Again is a continuation of.

From the moment our titular hero storms the arms-ferrying freighter in the season premiere's opening sequence, to this season's incredibly intense, blood-soaked finale, Born Again 2 doesn't hold back in the action-spectacle department.

Wilson Fisk takes part in a so-called charity boxing match in this season's fourth chapter (Image credit: Marvel Studios/Disney+)

Equipped with numerous in-your-face, chaotic, and smile-inducing set-pieces, I'd argue it even gives the original show's innovative action a run for its money.

Indeed, episode 3's final 15 minutes include some of my favorite fight scenes since Daredevil's infamous season 1 hallway, season 2 stairwell, and season 3 prison-escape sequences — no small feat when you remember how utterly absorbing those are. And, don't worry; Born Again 2 includes the requisite seasonal duel between Murdock's alter-ego and Fisk, albeit we're made to wait for the latest in a series of bruising, must-see showdowns between them. Enjoy it while it lasts, too, because scenes shared by the show's main characters are once again kept to a minimum.

Gruesomely entertaining as these action-packed episodes are, this season's fifth chapter is all but devoid of set-pieces — and yet, it's my favorite episode of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) project's latest season.

Episode 5's dual narratives are equal-parts sanguine, deeply intimate, poignant, and soul-crushing

An entry that splits its time between the past and present, its dual narratives are equal parts sanguine, deeply intimate, poignant, and soul-crushing. Through flashbacks, episode 5 cleverly fills in narrative gaps from the Netflix show, and serves as a timely reminder of how excellent Daredevil was.

That's particular true of the much-missed dynamic between Matt and Franklin 'Foggy' Nelson (Elden Henson), the latter of whom died in last season's premiere. With Henson's return confirmed in Born Again season 2's trailer, though, said relationship is resurrected in pleasing albeit bittersweet fashion.

On the present-day story front, it's the mark of great writing when audiences find themselves empathizing with a movie or show's villain(s). Episode 5 nails this with its current-day Fisk-led plot, with the events that transpire turning him into an even more of a terrifyingly loose-cannon of an antagonist in the season's final three chapters.

Bullseye continues to be one of the MCU's most fascinating and multifaceted characters (Image credit: Marvel Television/Disney+)

The same is true of episode 5's primary present-day subplot involving Murdock and the sociopathic Benjamin Pointdexter/Bullseye (Wilson Bethel), the latter of whom continues to be one of the most fascinating characters in this show and the wider MCU.

An individual with a superiority complex and newfound moral ambiguity who, like all great villains, views himself as the hero of his own story, Bullseye reinforces the case that Marvel should permanently adopt a returning nemesis policy. Multi-layered individuals like Bullseye and Fisk have proven it works so, if there's more than enough character-development fuel in the tank, there's no reason for Marvel not to put it into practice in future projects.

Vive la Résistance

Matt Murdock and Karen Page's dynamic is given much more screentime in season 2 (Image credit: Marvel Studios/Disney+)

With Daredevil: Born Again's first season severely underutilizing the Murdock-Page dynamic, it's great to see this pairing share much more screentime this time around, too. It's a bond that initially seems to be watertight, but cracks soon appear. Indeed, their opposing ideals become a breeding ground for lots of mandatory melodrama that, while mostly engaging, isn't explored to its full potential.

Murdock and Page's opposing ideals become a breeding ground for lots of mandatory melodrama

Regardless, it's extremely gratifying to see Woll's Page have a more substantial role in season 2, and put her extensive investigative and combat skills to use. Similarly, it's satisfying to see Murdock fully embrace his rage-filled, acrobatic vigilante persona — in his new Shadowland comic book-inspired black suit, which symbolizes this season's sobering mood, no less — after trying to avoid it for large portions of last season.

The pair aren't the only members of this cadre. Returning allies in Murdock's law-firm partner Kirsten McDuffie (Nikki James), retired NYPD cop Cherry (Clark Johnson), on-the-beat reporter B.B. Urich (Genneya Walton), and Angela del Toro/White Tiger 2.0 (Camila Rodriguez) have roles to play in fighting the good fight.

Krysten Ritter reprises her role as Jessica Jones for the first time in seven years (Image credit: Marvel Studios/Disney+)

It's the return of Krysten Ritter's Jessica Jones in Born Again season 2 that's the real headline-grabber, though. It's a homecoming previously teased by Marvel Head of TV Brad Winderbaum as being "filled with very cool surprises", although the hard-drinking private investigator disappointingly doesn't show up until this season's latter half. Nevertheless, it's terrific to not only see her back in action and at her wisecracking best, but also teaming up with Daredevil again to cause some chaos and re-forge the fun-filled dynamic they had in Netflix's The Defenders crossover miniseries.

It's terrific to see Jessica Jones back in action and at her wisecracking best

Other new characters — ones who operate in Wilson and Vanessa Fisk's (Ayelut Zurer) orbit, much to the former's annoyance — also inject fresh energy into proceedings.

The mysterious Mister Charles (Matthew Lillard), an amusingly abrasive and delightfully detestable individual brimming with chaotic energy, is a highly entertaining foil to the Fisks. Meanwhile, New York Governor Marge McCaffrey (Lili Taylor) is a serious political adversary whose administrative roadblocks regularly threaten to detail the criminal couple's activities. The Fisks, though, routinely find ways to spin the narrative in their favor, which often puts them one step ahead of everyone else in the fantastically fraught chess game that plays out in the Marvel Phase 6 project.

Mister Charles (right) inserts himself directly into the Fisks' affairs in season 2 (Image credit: Marvel Studios/Disney+)

To reiterate what I teased in my introduction, Born Again 2 isn't without fault — and, irritatingly, a lot of the issues that afflicted Daredevil: Born Again season 1 haven't been resolved, especially in episodes 1 through 4.

For starters, the oft-used harsh cuts between scenes and jarring addition of The B.B. Report, aka Urich's filmed vox pops, remain. Okay, it can be argued that the latter's inclusion is necessary from a worldbuilding viewpoint, but each installment eats up valuable time that would've been better used elsewhere.

And, hoo boy, are some side-stories and character arcs in dire need of being expanded on. From the predictable and ponderous nature of Heather Glenn's (Margarita Leveiva) journey, to the lack of discernible pay-off in Daniel Blake's (Michael Gandolfini) individual tale due to the inconsistent manner in which it's approached and told, Born Again 2 doesn't devote the necessary time to these subplots to give them the emotional weight they deserve.

My verdict

Daredevil: Born Again season 2's good aspects easily compensate for the bad, but it's arguable that the latter hold it back from being its best self.

Nonetheless, it's a higher-stakes, drama-fueled continuation of the Mayor Fisk story arc that further aligns the show with its Netflix predecessor. And, thanks to its emotionally impactful and much more cohesive back half, it builds towards an incredibly intense crescendo that's set to take the series in an intriguing new direction ahead of its already in-development third season.

Some of you might question why Born Again 2 scored lower than its forebear, which I gave four and a half stars out of five in my Daredevil: Born Again season 1 review. Simply put, that evaluation didn't cover the full season — if it had, I'd have dropped its rating by a whole star.

In that sense, then, Born Again's latest installment is an improvement on what came before — and if it can raise its game next season it might finally banish its story- and production-based demons for good.

Daredevil: Born Again season 2 episode 1 is out now on Disney+. Before you watch it, find out everything there is to know about Born Again season 2.

Acer Swift Edge 14 AI: 30-second review

Having recently covered the TravelMate P6 14 AI, the Acer Swift Edge 14 AI seems like a remarkably similar design, until you investigate the details.

All brands have a version of the thin-and-light laptop market where every machine looks broadly the same: aluminium lid, backlit chiclet keyboard, 14 inches of 1080p, and the manufacturer's brand at the top of the bezel. However, the Acer Swift Edge 14 AI dares to be different.

Built around Intel's Lunar Lake platform, the Swift Edge 14 AI packs a Core Ultra 7 258V processor into a magnesium-aluminium chassis that comes in under 990g. That alone is enough to make most carry-on bags significantly lighter, but Acer has also fitted a 14-inch 3K OLED panel treated with Corning Gorilla Matte Pro. That’s not typical, and positions this hardware with creatives in mind.

The Lunar Lake architecture also brings several surprises with it. The eight-core hybrid design drops Hyper-Threading entirely, pairing four Performance cores against four Low-Power cores, all built on TSMC 3nm. Since Intel chose to run its own foundries for many processors, the results are much better.

The memory subsystem is on-package LPDDR5X running eight 16-bit channels wide. Regrettably, these types of memory installations mean they cannot be upgraded, but they do deliver bandwidth that most discrete memory configurations cannot match.

The review system had 32GB, and that’s all it will ever have.

Graphics duties fall to the Intel Arc 140V with 64 Xe2 execution units, a significant step up from the iGPU silicon Intel was shipping two generations ago. It will not make a games enthusiast happy, but for photo editing, light video work, and the kind of AI-accelerated tasks the machine is specifically marketed towards, it holds its own convincingly.

The port selection is genuinely commendable for a machine this thin: two Thunderbolt 4 ports, two USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports, full-size HDMI, and a headset jack. The one notable omission is a MicroSD slot, which feels like it should be standard on a creative-leaning portable at this price.

With an official cost of around $1499 / £1399, the Swift Edge 14 AI is priced to compete with some very capable alternatives. Whether or not it wins that competition depends almost entirely on how much the display and the weight matter to you. If both matter a lot, this deserves a serious look.

There are a few wrinkles in the off-white finish of the Acer Swift Edge 14 AI, but overall, it offers a stellar hardware combination at a price few of the best business laptops can match.

Acer Swift Edge 14 AI: Price and availability

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

• How much does it cost? From $1500/£1400
• When is it out? Available now
• Where can you get it? Direct from Acer or online retailers

The laptop is available direct from Acer's US shop, as well as Amazon.com. In the UK, I'm seeing it available from Amazon.co.uk and Currys.

The UK model reviewed here has the part number NX.JG4EK.008 ships with the Core Ultra 7 258V, 32GB LPDDR5X, and a 1TB SSD for an RRP of £1,399. At the time of writing, Currys has it available for £1,399, which shifts the value proposition considerably. At that price, rivals start looking rather less compelling.

I have seen it for £1100 on Amazon.co.uk, but how long that deal will last is debatable.

In the USA, the American market equivalent (NX.JM6AA.002) with the same CPU, memory and storage sells for $1499.99 on Amazon.com, the same price as it is directly from Acer.

Direct competitors include the Asus Zenbook A14, which is half as much in the USA, using a Snapdragon X Plus processor, a lower-resolution OLED panel and half the RAM capacity. But due to the platform, that machine can’t run Intel X86 natively.

The MSI Prestige 14 AI Evo lands in a similar territory to the Acer in the UK, but maybe £250 cheaper. However, that’s for one with only a Core Ultra series 1 CPU.

If you are prepared to stretch a little further, the Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 on the same Lunar Lake platform costs noticeably more and brings additional enterprise features that most home and small-business users will not need. With the same spec as the Acer, it’s £1595.99 in the UK, and $1,759 in the USA.

It’s interesting that most of the machines that undercut the Acer Swift Edge 14 AI do so either by using an older-generation processor or by using IPS panels instead of the OLED in the Acer.

Therefore, it might not be cheap, but it represents decent value for money.

• Value: 4 / 5

Acer Swift Edge 14 AI: Specs

Model

Acer Swift Edge 14 AI (NX.JG4EK.008 / SFE14-51T)

CPU

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (Lunar Lake, TSMC 3nm, 4P + 4LP cores, 8 threads, up to 4.8GHz)

GPU

Intel Arc 140V (64 Xe2 execution units, up to 1,950MHz)

NPU

Intel AI Boost (48 TOPS)

RAM

32GB LPDDR5X on-package (8 x 16-bit channels, 8,533MHz, Micron, not upgradeable)

Storage

1TB M.2 PCIe 4.0 SSD

Display

14-inch 2,880 x 1,800 OLED, 120Hz, Corning Gorilla Matte Pro, 16:10

Ports

2x Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x 3.5mm combo jack

Camera

1080p FHD with IR (Windows Hello)

Networking

Wi-Fi 7 (Intel integrated), Bluetooth 5.4

Audio

Dual speakers with DTS Audio

Battery

65Wh

Charger

100W USB-C (included)

Dimensions

313.8 x 218.8 x 12.9 mm

Weight

Approx. 990g

Operating system

Windows 11 Home (pre-installed)

Color

White (Pure Silver also available)

Acer Swift Edge 14 AI: Design

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

• Magnesium-aluminium chassis, sub-1kg weight
• OLED display with Corning Gorilla Matte Pro treatment
• Great port selection
• No MicroSD or SIM card slots

Pick up the Swift Edge 14 AI, and the first thing you register is the weight, or rather the lack of it. At just under a kilogram, it sits in the hand more like a hardback novel than a laptop, and Acer has managed that without resorting to the flex-heavy thin plastic shells that cut corners on cheaper machines. The magnesium-aluminium build feels solid, with only the very slightest give under deliberate pressure on the lid.

Acer describes the finish as Stellar White, and the aesthetic is deliberately clean. The lid carries only a small Acer logo and the Swift Edge badge on the opposite side of the lid, which gives it an understated quality. The hinge action is smooth with some light resistance; it can be opened one-handed, and the lid can sit flat at 180 degrees if needed.

At 12.9mm thin, the Swift Edge 14 AI is noticeably slimmer than a lot of its competition. The side ports are arranged sensibly: both Thunderbolt 4 ports and the HDMI sit on the left alongside a USB-A port, while the other USB-A port and the 3.5mm combo jack are on the right. This keeps the more frequently used connectors on one side for desk use. The full-size HDMI is a genuine convenience. Although it is possible to convert a Thunderbolt port to HDMI or DisplayPort, if you need more screens.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

The keyboard is a backlit scissor-switch design with a reasonable 1.3mm of travel. Key spacing is generous for a 14-inch chassis, and the layout avoids the cramped cursor cluster that plagues thinner machines. There is a Copilot key, as expected for a Copilot+ PC, and a fingerprint reader is built into the power button. A separate IR camera above the display handles Windows Hello facial recognition with reasonable speed.

My only reservation about that camera is that, for the cost of this hardware, I’d have liked to see one that could do 4K, and not the 1440p limited one that Acer installed.

The trackpad is glass-surfaced, well-sized, and supports Windows Precision gestures throughout. It does not click anywhere near the top edge, which is a minor irritation if you are a corner-clicker by habit, but the tracking accuracy and palm rejection are both good.

Where the design really earns its place is with the display. The OLED panel, manufactured by BOE (model NB140B9M-T10 as confirmed by the hardware data), is a 14-inch 2,880 x 1,800 unit at a 16:10 aspect ratio, running up to 120Hz.

Acer has fitted Corning's Gorilla Matte Pro glass, which is notable because most matte treatments on OLED panels visibly degrade colour saturation and blacks. Gorilla Matte Pro is designed to minimize that effect, and to the naked eye, it succeeds. The panel retains deep blacks and vivid colours while cutting reflections to a level where even outdoor use in the shade is genuinely comfortable. At 313.8 x 218.8mm, the footprint is compact for a 14-inch machine, partly because the bezels are thin all around.

There are plenty of things to like about the design of this laptop, and relatively few issues to address. It lacks a MicroSD card slot, and for whatever reason, Acer doesn’t have a SIM card variant yet, but in most other respects, this has almost everything that most laptop users would like in their hardware.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

• Design: 4.5 / 5

Acer Swift Edge 14 AI: Hardware

• Intel Core Ultra 7 258V on TSMC 3nm
• On-package LPDDR5X 8-channel architecture
• Arc 140V GPU with 64 Xe2 execution units

The Lunar Lake platform that underpins the Swift Edge 14 AI is significantly different from the Meteor Lake and Raptor Lake generations that preceded it, and those differences matter more on paper than they might initially suggest.

The Core Ultra 7 258V uses a hybrid core design of four Performance P-cores and four Low-Power LP-cores, and none of these uses hyperthreading. Intel dropped it across the board for this generation to prioritise per-core efficiency over everything else.

The result is a chip that delivers eight threads from eight physical cores, which is a departure from the twelve-thread configurations of older 12th and 13th-generation machines. In practice, this rarely matters because most everyday workloads are not thread-saturated, and the efficiency gains are tangible in both thermals and battery life.

The processor is produced using TSMC's 3nm node, the same process used by Apple for its current M-series silicon. This places Lunar Lake at the leading edge of Intel's efficiency story, and the power figures confirmed during testing bear that out. The platform was drawing just over 4 watts at idle, with individual core temperatures sitting in the low-to-mid thirties Celsius. The thermal design of the Swift Edge 14 AI relies on a single fan with a heat pipe arrangement, and under light use, it is effectively silent.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

Another high point of Lunar Lake is that it places the LPDDR5X in much closer integration to the other parts of the system, using a non-upgradable Memory on Package (MoP) design. While previous Intel chips capped out at 6400 MT/s, the LPDDR5X-8533 used here offers lower latency and higher performance for AI and GPU operations.

The downside of using this memory model is that the RAM cannot be upgraded.

The GPU is Intel's Arc 140V with 64 Xe2 execution units boosting to 1,950MHz. This is a meaningful step up from the 96 EU Xe graphics in Meteor Lake and offers DirectX 12 Ultimate support, hardware raytracing, and Intel's XeSS upscaling.

It draws from the on-package memory pool and can handle Lightroom adjustments, DaVinci Resolve colour grading on 4K footage at reasonable resolutions, and light 3D viewport work without complaint. Gaming is possible at reduced settings in less demanding titles, but anyone expecting discrete GPU performance will be disappointed.

The NPU within the Lunar Lake SoC is rated at 48 TOPS, clearing the 40 TOPS threshold that qualifies the machine as a Copilot+ PC. This unlocks features including Windows Studio Effects on the webcam, Live Captions, and the broader Copilot+ feature set. Connectivity is handled entirely by Intel silicon: the Wi-Fi 7 module (identified in hardware data as device 0xA840) and Bluetooth 5.4 controller (0xA876) are both integrated into the Lunar Lake PCH, eliminating the third-party wireless card that most laptops require.

Storage comes via a 1TB M.2 PCIe 4.0 SSD, which is accessible (with effort -- nine screws secure the base panel) for replacement. Buyers who anticipate needing more storage should consider that at purchase time, since adding a second drive is not included.

While this, like almost all laptops these days, has limited upgrade potential, the system is honed to deliver a good user experience and performance suitable for a wide range of tasks.

• Hardware: 4 / 5

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)Acer Swift Edge 14 AI: Performance

Laptops

Acer Swift Edge 14 AI

Dell Latitude 9450

CPU

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

Core 7 Ultra 165U

Cores/Threads

8C 8T

12C 14T

TPD

17W-37W

15W

RAM

32GB LPDDR5X

32GB DDR5 (8x 4GB)

SSD

1TB Kingston OM8PGP4102Q

512GB Kioxia BG6

Graphics

Intel Arc 140V

Intel Graphics

NPU

Intel NPU (47 TOPS)

Intel NPU (40 TOPS)

3DMark

WildLife

20,983

14,643

FireStrike

8003

4676

TimeSpy

4065

1453

Steel Nomad.L

2989

1149

CineBench24

Single

120

97

Multi

389

465

Ratio

3.24

4.82

GeekBench 6

Single

2757

1653

Multi

11148

6026

OpenCL

29692

13892

Vulkan

33890

10077

CrystalDIsk

Read MB/s

4805

4997

Write MB/s

3905

4363

PCMark 10

Office

8206

6293

Battery

18h 28m

19h 18m

Battery

Whr

65

60

PSU

100W

60W

WEI

Score

8.8

8.2

For my comparison, I originally considered the Acer TravelMate P6 14 AI, but that’s an almost identical platform to the Swift Edge, and the numbers didn’t tell much of a story.

Instead, I chose the Dell Latitude 9450 to show what a major upgrade the 200-series machines are over the previous 100-series.

What we are seeing here is a major ram in power efficiency, and what that provides for both thermal ranges and clock speeds.

With CPU-Z confirming a package power draw of around 4 watts at idle and temperatures in the mid-thirties, the Swift Edge 14 AI is evidently conservative with its thermal budget when nothing demanding is happening. Under load, the picture is more nuanced.

Acer configures a sustained PL1 power limit of 30W and a short-burst PL2 of 37W, taking it slightly above Intel's reference values, suggesting a high degree of confidence in the cooling solution. In extended workloads such as video encoding or large RAW batch processing, the fan becomes audible. It is not aggressive, but it is present, which is worth noting for anyone planning to use the machine in quiet environments.

Per-core clock speed data captured during testing shows the P-cores reaching 4,500MHz on a single boosting core, with the LP-cores running independently up to 3,700MHz on their own tasks. Intel Thread Director dynamically distributes work between the two pools, and in practice, scheduling is handled sensibly. Background tasks migrate to LP-cores and stay there unless priority changes, conveniently.

When you consider that the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has significantly fewer cores than the Core 7 Ultra 165U, it consistently delivers more compute, AI and GPU performance across the board.

The Arc 140V GPU proves its worth in tasks that conventionally required discrete silicon. Export times in Adobe Lightroom Classic with AI Denoise applied are substantially faster than equivalent Iris Xe workloads from the previous generation. DaVinci Resolve colour work on 1080p footage runs smoothly, though complex node stacks at 4K are probably asking the machine to work too hard. If you need to edit a 4K video, then consider something with a discrete GPU onboard.

In the same vein, games are possible but best treated as an occasional bonus rather than a primary use case. Older titles at 1080p with reduced settings run acceptably, while current AAA releases are better left to machines with discrete GPUs.

Battery life is one of the more compelling parts of the Swift Edge 14 AI's pitch. The 65Wh cell is substantial for a machine this light, and the efficiency of the Lunar Lake platform means it goes a long way. I should say that the Acer TravelMate P6 14 AI lasted another 2.5 hours, but its performance numbers overall were lower. Nearly 18.6 hours is still a great result, and should get even the most dedicated worker through a whole day.

The 100W USB-C charger in the box is fast enough to recover a meaningful charge during a short break, recovering 37% in just 30 minutes from zero charge.

These days, I always test laptop displays with a DataColor Spyder X2 calibrator, but the OLED panel on this machine does not work well with the software's analysis. Where it revealed that the panel has a superb 100% of P3 Gamut, it couldn’t work out the contrast or Gamma levels at all.

The OLED panel's brightness peaks at levels that make indoor use comfortable under practically any overhead lighting condition, and the 120Hz refresh rate keeps scrolling and cursor tracking smooth throughout. The Gorilla Matte Pro screen treatment does what it claims, keeping outdoor reflections manageable without noticeably impacting the OLED's characteristic contrast.

One detail that’s missing from my data chart is the weight of these machines, and that’s remarkably telling. The Acer is under 1kg, and the Dell is closer to 1.5kg.

Overall, on an Intel machine, the Acer Swift Edge 14 AI delivers top-drawer performance.

• Performance: 4.5 / 5

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)Acer Swift Edge 14 AI: Final verdict

The Swift Edge 14 AI is the machine you reach for when the weight of a laptop has started to feel like part of the problem rather than part of the solution. At under a kilogram, it genuinely changes how you think about carrying it, without requiring any of the structural compromises that thinner, lighter machines sometimes hide.

The display is the obvious headline. A 3K OLED panel at 120Hz with Gorilla Matte Pro glass is not something you find at this price point very often, and it delivers on the promise in everyday use. The anti-reflective treatment is genuinely effective rather than token, which matters if any of your work takes place anywhere other than a controlled office environment.

Under the surface, the Lunar Lake architecture brings a memory subsystem that competes well on bandwidth against more expensive configurations, a chip that handles sustained workloads without melting its surroundings, and enough AI headroom to qualify for the full Copilot+ feature set. The Arc 140V GPU is not a gaming chip, but it is an effective creative tool, and the distinction is worth drawing.

The compromises are real and should not be minimised. The memory cannot be upgraded, ever. The webcam and speakers are both average for the asking price. There is no MicroSD slot. If any of those limitations are dealbreakers, they should be assessed honestly before purchase.

For buyers who want a genuinely portable machine with an exceptional display, solid real-world performance, and a port selection that does not require a dock, the Swift Edge 14 AI makes a strong case.

Should you buy a Acer Swift Edge 14 AI?

Value

A great price for this spec

4.5/5

Design

Lightweight magnesium chassis and a decent port selection

4/5

Hardware

Intel Core Ultra 200 Series CPU, gorgeous OLED screen and excellent battery life

4/5

Performance

Similar to other Core Ultra 7 258V systems, but with a little more punch

4.5/5

Overall

Super-practical system with enough battery for a long working day and a workable port selection.

4.5/5

Buy it if...

You need a highly portable machine
If you travel regularly and are sensitive to weight, a 990g bag is genuinely different from a 1.4kg bag. Its associated charger doesn’t add much extra, considering it outputs 100W.

Display quality matters to your work
The OLED panel with Gorilla Matte Pro is a cut above the field at this price. It delivers incredible contrast and a superb colour gamut for those working with visuals.

Don't buy it if...

You like to upgrade
The 32GB LPDDR5x memory is soldered onto the mainboard and cannot be upgraded. Users looking for long-term flexibility or future-proofing may find this limiting, especially if workloads grow more demanding over time.

You want the highest levels of performance
Compared to the latest AMD Ryzen AI machines or the Intel 300 series ones coming, the processor and graphics in this system aren’t the quickest available.
If compute power is paramount, and battery life is less important, then consider a system that uses the AMD Ryzen AI 395 Max+.View Deal

With its incredibly expressive and vibrant art direction, there’s a lot to like about extraction shooter Marathon from an aesthetic standpoint. Its own brand of brightly colored science fiction is a sight to behold, and there’s a real sense of wonder in the first few hours as you explore each of the three early maps, soaking it all in.

Review info

Platform reviewed: PC
Available on: PS5, Xbox Series X|S, PC
Release date: March 5, 2026

Developed by Bungie, the original creators of Halo, it should come as no surprise that the gunplay is well-crafted and compelling, with a strong variety of meaningfully distinct weapon types to try out. They're great-looking, like the rest of the world, too, with striking, blocky, 3D printed designs that really help sell the distant future setting.

These strong fundamentals mean that Marathon is plenty of fun when you’re joined by two friends in a full team, where the intense player-versus-player (PvP) encounters really shine. Unfortunately, the unremittingly grindy missions and lack of compelling cosmetic rewards, not to mention the current rather threadbare content offering, seriously limit the game’s long term potential.

With a Steam player count that’s been gradually declining for weeks since the game’s initial launch, some big changes are needed if Marathon is going to be more than a sprint.

Starting line

(Image credit: Bungie)

I am optimistic, as many of my biggest problems with Marathon have been addressed in the time since launch. The thoroughly miserable inventory, for example, has been overhauled completely. Why did tiny stacks of three med kits and 60 ammo (items needed in bulk for practically every run) originally take up most of your highly limited slots?

I’m not entirely sure, as this would have presumably been immediately highlighted as a problem by play testers, but with their stacks increased to nine and 800, respectively, you're no longer spending minutes staring at the screen and selling your recently obtained gear in order to ensure that you have enough space to start another match.

The difficulty of computer-controlled enemies has been rebalanced, too, with the generic hostile robots that litter each map now not needing you to pump multiple magazines into them if you’re unlucky enough to get spotted. The game still doesn’t do a great job of communicating whether a hostile bot is carrying a super-powerful shield (you seem to need to manually ping them every time in order to see that), but being able to reliably take on these threats head-on makes it much easier to move around in each game.

The latest major update also introduced Cryo Archive (which went live on March 20, 2026), a stellar, massive map filled with challenging combat gauntlets and countless hidden secrets to uncover.

Best bit

(Image credit: Bungie)

I’ve loved everything about Marathon’s aesthetic since its very first trailer. The maps are stunning and have a range of possible weather conditions that all look great. The Runner shells are attractive too, with distinct designs that reflect their abilities.

Set in a crumbling spacecraft, it’s a delight to explore and is bursting with high-end loot. It’s only available to jump into on weekends, though, which feels like Bungie artificially gating off content for no real reason other than to prevent players from finding everything that it has to offer too quickly and then simply leaving to play something else.

It’s a massive shame, especially when the three launch maps don’t have much going for them. Perimeter, the starting map, is tiny and segmented with multiple chokepoints that make running into other teams practically a guarantee. As with other extraction shooters, bullets are lethal here, and the threat of stumbling upon others is thrilling at first, but you’ll quickly learn the layout like the back of your hand. The map is so small that more experienced players like to beeline straight for the locations of key items for the earliest quests, too, forcing newcomers to contend with frustrating campers.

It wouldn’t be such a big issue if you could progress more than one quest at a time, but you can’t. They’re mostly boring fetch quests too, and dropping into a map only to discover what you need is long gone, just leaves entire matches feeling like a total waste of time.

Faltering pace

(Image credit: Bungie)

The other two readily available maps, Dire Marsh and Outpost, are both much better thanks to their larger sizes and more complex layouts, not to mention the fact that later missions are slightly less repetitive than the early ones. Don’t be fooled by the increased scale, though, as you’ll still encounter other teams near constantly. Marathon might be one of the most combat-heavy extraction shooters that I’ve ever played, which is fun when you’re able to coordinate with a team of friends, but invariably miserable if you choose to matchmake with randoms.

You can embody one of six Runner shells (synthetic bodies with their own distinct personalities) plus the blank-slate, solo-play-only Rook. None of the shell’s hero-like abilities are particularly imaginative (with your usual suite of movement, stealth, recon, healing, and tank powers), but they do all work well and lead to some interesting combat scenarios.

I particularly love dropping in as Vandal, the movement hero, and using her super-sprint ability to flank entire teams. It‘s incredibly effective with a meaty shotgun in hand, plus a longer-range homing energy weapon for locking on to any foes that might try to flee.

(Image credit: Bungie)

When it all comes together, the moment-to-moment action can be incredibly fun, but after almost forty hours grinding through quests, I can’t help but sit back and wonder what I’m actually doing it all for.

Bungie has already confirmed that your progress is going to be wiped every few months, with only cosmetic unlocks carrying over. Unfortunately, the skins are completely bland and not really worth the time investment. This is doubly true of the ones in the paid battle pass (which is stuffed with basic weapon recolors and just one simplistic Runner skin) and the measly assortment offered in the in-game store.

Even with the addition of Cryo Archive, it’s not like there are anywhere near enough maps or modes (the game launched with just one) to keep me coming back for more, and I can’t help but think other players will inevitably feel the same with time.

There’s very little here compared to even free-to-play alternatives like Arena Breakout: Infinite, which looks much less impressive but boasts significantly more to do and, importantly, doesn't actually cost any money to get into. Hopefully, future updates will build out this beautiful-looking game with some much-needed substance before it’s too late.

Should I play Marathon?Play it if...

You have a full team of friends on hand
Marathon is at its best when you’re playing as a full team of friends and coordinating throughout its intense PvP encounters.

You love the aesthetic
There’s no game out there today that looks quite like Marathon. It’s beautiful to look at, and worth playing if you love how it looks.

Don't play it if...

You want a game you can pour hundreds of hours into
There’s just not enough here to justify playing Marathon for an extended period of time. The limited selection of maps and lack of attractive rewards for grinding through its repetitive quests mean that you’ll struggle to stay engaged after too long.

Accessibility features

Marathon doesn’t have a dedicated accessibility menu, but there are a few useful options in its settings menus. On PC, the game can be played with either keyboard and mouse or a controller, with the ability to rebind inputs fully on either control method.

There are four colorblind modes to choose from, which affect item rarity colors and the appearance of the HUD. Subtitles are enabled by default and can be customized in size, color, and background style.

How I reviewed Marathon

I played almost 40 hours of Marathon on my PC, which is a 5070 Ti-powered model from retailer Scan.

It has a compact Corsair 2000d RGB Airflow case, Asus ROG Strix B860-I motherboard, Intel Core Ultra 7 265K processor, a 2TB WD Black SN770 SSD, 32GB of DDR5 Corsair Vengeance RAM, and an Asus Nvidia 5070 Ti graphics card, which allowed me to play the game at 75 frames per second (fps) on the Highest pre-set graphics mode at native resolution on my 1080p monitor. I trust an Astro A20 X wireless gaming headset for my audio needs, including the use of its microphone when playing with friends.

I played the game exclusively with my usual gaming mouse and keyboard: a Razer DeathAdder V4 Pro and Cherry XTRFY K5V2.

Throughout my time with the game, I compared my experience with my hands-on testing of other extraction shooters, namely Escape from Tarkov and Arena Breakout: Infinite, in addition to the wider first-person shooter genre.

First reviewed March 2026

Birdfy Bird Bath Pro: one-minute review

I've tried out multiple bird feeder cameras, and let me tell you, the charm is yet to wear off. They are a top gadget for nature lovers, getting a close up view of your neighborhood birdlife.

Birdfy is one of the top names in this space — in fact, its 5-star Feeder 2 Duo sits in the top spot of my best bird feeder cameras guide. It went one step further from alternatives, adding a second motion-sensitive camera for two angles, to its bird identification skills and continuous year-round power (pricier models tend to feature a solar panel).

Then at CES 2026, Birdfy and Birdbuddy showcased new products and exciting new features to further enhance the garden birdlife experience. Chief among them was Birdbuddy's sound identification and Birdfy's 360-degree bird feeder camera, plus a new type of bird camera — the Bird Bath Pro.

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)

If it wasn't already obvious from the name and my product-in-situ pictures, the Bird Bath Pro is not a bird feeder camera, but a bird bath camera.

It's an excellent foil to a bird feeder camera, providing an entertaining close-up look at other bird behavior such as preening and splashing, but in reality, I found its most exciting features lacked polish, while the design could do with looking a little more natural. I'd still recommend the product, mind you, and I hope that some issues, such as bird tracking and identification performance, can be improved with updates.

Birdfy Bird Bath Pro: price and availability

• Available with or without the stand, from $269.99 / £319.99 (AU$ TBC)
• It comes in blue or off-white
• There's free lifetime AI detection and unlimited cloud storage

The Birdfy Bird Bath Pro is available in blue or off-white versions, and can be purchased with or without the stand. As you can see, I had the off-white version; neither looks particularly natural and requires dressing up to better attract birdlife.

The 'Non-stand' version costs $269.99 / £319.99, while the 'Stand' version is $349.99 / £349.99. At the time of writing, there are big savings on those prices: the 'Non-stand' for $179.99 / £209.99 and the Stand version for $299.99 / £229.99.

On the Birdfy US and Birdfy UK sites, there's a lifetime AI service for free (bird detection). However, if you opt for an AI subscription in the US, it brings down the price of the Bird Bath Pro by $30, though you'll need to pay up should you want the AI service subscription at any point, which is $4.99p/m.

Birdfy Bird Bath Pro: specsBirdfy Bird Bath Pro specs

Sensor

Unknown

Photo

2MP wide camera, 3MP portrait camera

Video

1080p wide camera, 2K portrait camera

Memory

N/A

Dimensions

30in / 76.5 cm height with stand, 3.5L basin capacity

Weight

6.9lbs / 3.1kg (without stand), 10.8lbs / 4.9 kg (with stand)

Battery

9,000mAh battery and a 1.9W solar panel, fountain has a 1.6W solar panel

Birdfy Bird Bath Pro: design

• Setup takes mere minutes
• I'd prefer a more natural-looking design
• Rugged build quality, decent solar power performance

OK, so it resembles a child's high chair, but the Bird Bath Pro is actually kind of neat. It's a cinch to set up — you'll be up and running in minutes once you've completed an initial charge of the camera unit by USB.

Once in place, the camera's power stays topped up thanks to a beefy 1.9W solar panel. The water fountain is solely solar powered (1.65W), and I found it requires direct sunlight to work fully. It'll power out completely without bright daylight.

Of course, the Bird Bath Pro needs topping up with fresh water, and Birdfy recommends adding natural features to it in order to readily attract birdlife — I put good use to a growing collection of beach stones my children like to collect during holidays on the coast.

I set up the device where I live in the UK in March (which is early Spring), initially with the weather still pretty cold, and found it took several days for birds to get curious, despite seeing them active in the garden at a nearby feeder and collecting for nests and so on. A feeder camera has a more obvious, immediate lure.

Tim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanTim Coleman

The app offers additional tools such as an audible alarm on the camera to scare off unwanted visitors, while Birdfy also promotes the device's rugged credentials — the camera protector is supposedly scratch-proof and UV resistant, so it shouldn't yellow over time.

Having used the Birdfy Bird Bath Pro for a month or more, it's clearly a durable product.

The main downside, based on my own experience, is that the Bird Bath Pro hasn't attracted nearly the same number or variety of birds as my bird feeder camera close by, over the same period. (In the summer heat, it might be a different story.) That said, it's a nice foil to a bird feeder camera, should you already own one and love it.

Birdfy Bird Bath Pro: performance

• Dual cameras; a 2MP / 1080p wide, and a tighter 3MP / 2K portrait
• The portrait camera can move side to side, tracking visitors
• Visitors are identified, with recording pop-up notifications, but accuracy could be better

There are twin cameras set within the Bird Bath Pro's removable and USB rechargeable unit: one for a wide-angle view of the entire bath, and another at a slightly higher vantage point, which can track subjects from side to side and with a tighter portrait-format field of view for more detailed shots.

Image quality is typically lo-fi compared to a smartphone; the tight portrait lens shoots 2K video and 3MP stills, while the wide camera is just 1080p video and 2MP stills. However, as far as bird feeder cameras go, the portrait lens especially is decent quality.

Once movement is detected, the Bird Bath Pro kicks into action, recording photo and video clips for both cameras and sending a 'Motion alert' notification through the free companion app. My unit came with the free lifetime AI service, and automatically detected a European Robin as a first sighting.

Tim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanTim Coleman

I received infrequent bursts of 'motion alert' notifications in the app on my Android phone throughout my test, as well as 'bird' and 'animal' sightings, only to find recorded clips of motion in the surroundings (even plants moving in the wind), or a fly on one of the rocks, rather than detected birdlife. It pays to be smart about where you position the camera for maximum effect and minimal false alerts.

The first location I tried was a spot typically in the shade for most of the morning, but with good exposure to daylight in the afternoon until partway into the evening. Here I found the camera unit maintained its charge day-by-day over the course of my month-long review period, and I have no doubt it would maintain this performance year-round.

Photos and video clips are displayed chronologically in the app's gallery, and Birdfy provides unlimited cloud storage for those files for up to 30 days. You can manually add favorite clips and new sightings to a Collections folder for easy access, and you're free to download the files at any point. Many rival bird camera brands pin you down to monthly subscriptions for such features.

It's also possible to view the camera's live feed on your mobile device from anywhere with an internet connection, and manually record should you wish.

Tim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanTim ColemanTim Coleman

The portrait camera levels up image quality, though I found subject tracking hit and miss; the camera's side-to-side movement seemed totally random at times. On the occasions it worked, the erratic movement of birds proved hard to keep up with (check out my sample videos below).

The portrait camera has plenty of potential and could set this Birdfy product apart, but in my experience, it needs more work to fulfill its promise.

I contacted Birdfy about the performance of the portrait camera and supplied footage. I got this reply:

"The camera's tracking algorithm is based on optical flow. The tracking will be affected by the changing patterns of light and shadow on the surface of rippling water (movements of/contrast between the reflections of trees' branches and the sky).

"The team will put in every effort to optimize and update the algorithm so as to tweak this feature. We'll continuously keep you posted on the progress of this."

While that's no guarantee of future performance improvements, it's reassuring to know that Birdfy is looking into it, and I know that its customer service is very good.

Lens flare in bright light is also an issue — I experienced a pronounced red halo in sunny conditions. Also, being a bird bath, the cameras are prone to being splashed on when birds visit. That's not an issue in terms of durability, but droplets on the camera do spoil photo and video recordings.

Should you buy the Birdfy Bird Bath Pro?

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)Buy it if...

You want a subscription-free wildlife camera

Birdfy's app is free, as is the AI service and unlimited cloud storage (for up to 30 days), meaning you can enjoy photos and videos on your mobile device without being pinned down by a costly monthly subscription.

You already own and love a bird feeder camera

If you already use a bird feeder camera and enjoy the gadget, then the Bird Bath Pro is a sensible complementary product, giving a similar viewing experience but from a different type of stage — a splash pool rather than a seed tray!

Don't buy it if...

You want frequent visitors

In my experience, a bird feeder camera is much more popular with the local birdlife than a bird bath.

You'd like an attractive feature in your garden

Birdfy has a range of bird cameras, including attractive natural-looking feeder cameras made from wood. In my opinion, the Bird Bath Pro's design is unattractive, being unatural for the spaces it's designed for.

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)How I tested the Birdfy Bird Bath Pro

• I set up the product in my garden within close proximity to my home router
• I tested it for over a month during the springtime in the UK
• It saw out mixed weather: sun, cloud, rain, wind, cold

Birdfy sent me the Bird Bath Pro following CES 2026 in January, when it was winter (in the UK), but I began my review period once spring was setting in, two months later. I placed the product in various spots in my garden, generally with mixed sunlight and shade, and close to the natural cover of bushes. I decked the bath with stones to make it appear more natural.

I paired the Bird Bath Pro with Birdfy's companion app on my Android phone and used the app daily, receiving regular motion alerts (of which there were more than of actual visiting birds), and saved my favorite photos and video files to my 'Collections' in the app.

• First reviewed March 2026

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4: Two-minute review

When I sat down and first started listening to the Samsung Galaxy Buds 4, sitting at my desk at home, I was mildly pleased with their audio performance. But when I started using them out and about in the world, not in my cosy chair, these quickly became some of my least favorite headphones to test in recent months. Some of the best earbuds around for the cash-savvy buyer? Sadly, no.

That’s a surprise; I gave the Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro an almost-perfect review score, and expected these affordable alternatives to fare just as well. But I have been loathe to use them during the testing period, for one simple reason.

These earbuds just wouldn’t stay in my ears. When I was sitting still at home, they’d more or less work fine – although they’d often slip from their default position so the drivers were further from my ears than they should be. If this was the entirety of my testing, I’d give them a perfectly fine review, but life’s not just about sitting still.

When I went on walks with the buds, they’d slip constantly, and I’d have to readjust them several times each minute to push them back in. I like to walk, and went on multiple hour-long rambles during the testing time. Imagine how long I had my hands in my ears, fidgeting and fixing slippage.

They also fared incredibly poorly on public transport (too shaky), when I was in bed (too angled) and even sometimes when I’d rotated my swivelling office chair. I didn't dare take them to the gym or on a run.

Even if the things weren’t flung from my ears multiple times per song, they have a truly awful battery life; with ANC and other features turned on, I’d get about three hours per charge. And that's before I even mention the meagre ANC performance – because of the poor fit, the active noise cancellation algorithm here has absolutely zero chance of stopping you hearing the sounds around you.

There are some elements of the Galaxy Buds 4 that you might like: they offer really high-quality music, and do look classy. And if you’re lucky enough to have ears like vices, you might not have the same fit issues I did – but I’ve never had issues quite like this in other similar buds, and know Samsung’s earbuds have a reputation for poor fit, so I really don’t think it’s a me problem.

A quick Google search shows that users had the same issue with the Buds 3. It's easy to find reports of them slipping out of the ears, so it's clear that this is a recurring issue which the company hasn't fixed. I try to avoid reading coverage of products I'm testing, but I've already seen reports of Buds 4 users having the same issue.

If you’ve got the money and a Samsung phone, the easier fix is to splash out a little more on the Galaxy Buds 4 Pro, with their ear-tips offering a more secure fit (though not a perfect one). But honestly, there are countless great wireless earbuds for this much or less, that won’t jump from your ear at every opportunity.

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 review: Price and release date

(Image credit: Future)

• Announced in February 2026, released March
• Sells for $179 / £159 / AU$299
• No price change from past models

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 were announced at Galaxy Unpacked on February 25, and have been available to buy from March 11, just like the Pro model and the Samsung Galaxy S26 series.

The retail price of the buds is $179 / £159 / AU$299, which is a mid-range price for earbuds like these, though they seem affordable when compared to the $249 / £219 / AU$399 Buds 4 Pro. There’s been no price hike over the Galaxy Buds 3, which is always good to see.

I know what you’re wondering: ‘how does that compare to Apple?’. The AirPods 4 with ANC cost $179 / £179 / AU$299, a very similar price point: the same in the US and Australia, but pricier in the UK. But if you don’t need ANC, the standard AirPods 4 cost $129 / £129 / AU$219, so they’re cheaper.

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 review: Specs

Drivers

11mm woofer

Active noise cancellation

Yes

Battery life (ANC off)

6 hours buds, 30 hours case

Weight

4.6g buds, 45.1g case

Connectivity

Bluetooth 6.1

Frequency response

Not specified

Waterproofing

IP54

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 review: Features

(Image credit: Future)

• Buds last about 3 hours per charge
• ANC has limited effectiveness
• Range of handy features

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 technically do have noise cancellation, but due to their open-fit design (think Apple EarPods), they don’t plug up your ear to stop outside noise leaking in. So practically, they reduce very little noise. I could notice some noise cancellation when turning the feature off and on, but only a marginal amount.

Sometimes when I had the buds in but wasn't listening to music, I could hear them try to compensate for loud noises by pumping out what sounded like white noise. Not only did it fail to stop the background noise, it added a little extra layer of annoyance. Don’t buy these if you need good ANC.

Don’t buy them if you need a long-lasting battery either; their play time is abysmal. With ANC turned off you’re only looking at 6 hours of listening; Samsung’s official figure puts ANC-on listening at five hours but in my own testing, with features like SSC (Samsung Seamless Codec) turned on, I was barely scraping three.

You can get about five recharges from the case, which isn’t amazing, but didn’t affect me too much during my testing weeks. Just remember to plug them in regularly.

(Image credit: Future)

But now we can move onto the other features, and there’s a lot more to like there. The buds support Bluetooth 6.1, with support for codecs like SSC, AAC, SBC and LC3 (no LDAC). I had a few Bluetooth dropouts during my time with the buds, but not so many that it couldn’t have been environmental.

The buds offer a range of tools like call sharpening profiles, spatial audio with head tracking, a nine-band equalizer with presets, volume normalization, adaptive sound to cater for how you wear your earbuds (i.e., at what stage of falling out they’re at) and so on. You can even use the buds to tap into nearby audio broadcasts.

The only major omission is multipoint connection, but that’s not even a feature I’d consider mandatory in earbuds. There’s also no listening test, like in the Pro, but I didn’t find it wholly useful in those buds so again, no (further) marks docked.

• Features score: 3.5/5

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 review: Design

(Image credit: Future)

• Swanky 'Blade' look
• Charging case is small and light
• Buds aren't designed for sticking in ear

I’ve got to say, I really like the Samsung Galaxy Bud 4’s charging case. It’s a lightweight, see-through square box, that the buds easily slot into. It weighs just 45.1g and measures 51 x 51 x 28.3mm, and really disappeared into my pocket.

The buds themselves look pretty good too, with their refined ‘Blade’ designed from the Buds 3 stripping out the lights and much of the fuss. The polished silver metal band on the white buds I tested looks great, but there’s also a black model you can pick up.

Unfortunately, that’s basically all I can praise about the Buds 4’s design, because for the three weeks I tested the buds, their build was the bane of my existence.

(Image credit: Future)

I’ve already spent much of the introduction to this article moaning about the Galaxy Buds 4’s fit, but in case you skipped that: these things just don’t stay still in your ears. If they’re not outright falling out, they’re moving around so that the drivers are pointing any which way, making music sound worse.

This'll no doubt be worst for people with big ears, but a few design decisions ensure that they won't be a good fit for anyone. The lack of a tip means you can’t just wedge the Buds 4 in your ears and hope for the best, and the material of the body is so smooth and friction-free that it fails to keep them anchored in ears.

It feels like the weighting of the buds is wrong too, so their own heft causes them to list and then fall from the ears. They’re not heavy, at just 4.6g, but the amount of ear-pirouettes they managed suggests the center of gravity is off in some way.

On the Buds 4’s stem, there’s a touch control: swipe up or down for volume, or pinch to play and pause your music. I quickly discovered that swiping was just another way for me to fling the buds out of my ears, but pinching is great: a light click lets you know that your demand was registered.

• Design score: 2.5/5

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 review: Sound quality

(Image credit: Future)

• Single driver per bud
• High-quality streamed music
• Detailed sound

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 have a single driver per ear; it’s one of the big downgrades from the Pro, with the bass-focused woofer absent. It’s a shame, because extra bass oomph is needed: it might go some way in mitigating how quickly you lose it when the earbuds start to slip…

Generally speaking, and when you’re sitting still with the Buds 4 angled perfectly, they sound about as good as you’d expect for the price. They’re bright and detailed; the acoustic guitars in Only the Good Die Young by Billy Joel sparkle and the keys in the piano introduction to Tiny Dancer by Elton John had just as much personality as the rocket man’s own voice did.

The lack of a dedicated woofer hurts, when comparing these to the Buds 4 Pro. Bass isn’t as scooping and defined as I’d like, instead sounding muddy indistinct. If you listen to Phosphorscent’s C’est La Vie No.2 by Phosphorescent or The Rocketeer by Foxy Shazam, the bass just melts into the band and loses its edge.

(Image credit: Future)

Detail and quality really is the name of the game here, as for all their strengths and weaknesses, you’re hearing it all… at least, if you’re using a Samsung phone, which allows for the SSC-UHQ codec. This allows for 24-bit/96kHz transmission, and makes an audible difference over listening on other devices.

So the Galaxy Buds 4 aren’t the best earbuds I’ve tested, even at the price, but they’re decent. But remember everything I said about the fit? Yeah – between the slow slipping and leaking background sound, I very rarely got the best from the buds. When I used them while walking, or on public transport, the bass vanished pretty quickly and often the mids were drowned out by noise, leaving only some hi-hats and vocals to enjoy.

The buds have a fairly high max volume, but I noticed something odd: the bass would audibly drop from the mix as I got near the top. Every time I pressed ‘volume up’ from five steps off max, every instrument would get louder, except for the bass which would step back. It meant two or three presses of my volume keys would result in a drastically different sound mix, and it was much tinnier-sounding at the top than I’d expect.

• Sound quality: 4/5

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 review: Value

(Image credit: Future)

• Mid-range price for buds
• Other options get you more for your money

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 aren’t cheap, and honestly, you’re within your rights to expect a little more from your earbuds.

A single driver? A sub-movie-length battery life? A design that doesn’t seem well thought out? If these were budget buds I’d understand, but $179 / £159 / AU$299 is far from cheap in the varied world of wireless earbuds.

There are other similar-priced options out there which offer you a lot more for your money, or give a similar package to the Buds 4 but at a fraction of the cost.

• Value: 3/5

Should I buy the Samsung Galaxy Buds 4?

(Image credit: Future)Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 score card

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Features

The ANC struggles and the battery life is woeful, but a few other features claw back points.

3.5/5

Design

They're not designed to stick in your ear, even if they look good.

2.5/5

Sound quality

The Buds 4 offer high-quality music with a bright, detailed sound.

4/5

Value

They're not expensive per se, but you can get a lot more for your money.

3/5

Buy them if…

You need office work buds
If you're going to be listening to these while sitting still at a desk, some of their biggest issues won't affect you.

You own a Samsung phone
The SSC-UHQ codec is really something else, but it's only available for owners of modern Samsung smartphones.View Deal

You need a wireless charging case
Wireless charging still isn't commonplace in earbud cases, but the Buds 4 offer this convenient feature.View Deal

Don’t buy them if…

You need long-lasting buds
Few earbuds I've tested have a worse battery life than the Buds 4. Not for travellers, or those who like a long listening stint.

You need exercise buds
I won't beat this dead horse any longer, but these buds just don't survive if your head is moving: bobbing as you walk or reclining at the gym.

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 review: Also consider

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4

Apple AirPods 4 with ANC

Status Audio Pro X

Drivers

11mm

'Custom high-excursion' Apple driver

12mm

Active noise cancellation

Yes

Yes

No

Battery life (ANC on)

6 hours (buds) 30 hours (case)

5 hours (buds) 20 hours (case)

7 hours (buds) 25 hours (case)

Weight

4.6g (buds) 45.1g (case)

4.3g (buds) 32.3g (case)

4.5g (buds) 50g (case)

Connectivity

Bluetooth 6.1

Bluetooth 5.3

Bluetooth 5.3

Waterproofing

IP54

IP57

IP54

AirPods 4 with ANC
The natural competitor, these earbuds come at a similar price and with a comparable feature set, though you need an iPhone to be able to use them.
Read our full AirPods 4 with ANC review

Denon AH-C500W
Want tip-less earbuds for a lot less, and from a Samsung sub-brand? These Denon models fit me much better, though they don't quite sound as good and offer a thinner list of features.
Read our full Denon Ah-C500W

How I tested the Samsung Galaxy Buds 4

• Tested for a month
• Tested at home, on walks and on public transport

I tested the Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 immediately after the Pro model, so they were a natural comparison. I used them paired to a Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra phone for the duration of the testing process, and listened to audio on Spotify, internal storage, various streaming services and games.

The test process for the buds was around three weeks, though I used them occasionally for a week prior when I received them at the same time as the Pro.

I've been reviewing gadgets at TechRadar for about 8 years now, including plenty of earbuds and Samsung gadgets (including the Buds 3 Pro too).

• First reviewed in March 2026

• Read TechRadar's reviews guarantee

HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14: Two-minute review

The HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 is a 2-in-1 laptop designed with creators in mind, owing to its capable spec and bundled stylus.

It looks smart and sleek, especially in its dark blue guise, which adds more interest than the grey alternative. The angled back corners also distinguish it from the crowd, as well as serving a practical purpose that I’ll come to later.

The standout aspect of its form, though, is its thinness. It certainly cuts a slender figure, but more remarkable is the fact that this doesn’t come at the expense of sturdiness: the aluminum frame has no flex at all, and easily ranks among the best 2-in-1 laptops in terms of build quality.

The downside of this construction, though, is its weight. The Ultra Flip is heavier than you might expect, which makes it a little more onerous to carry around than its rivals. It’s still within acceptable bounds, however.

Oddly, it’s the included stylus, the HP MPP 2.0 Tilt Pen, that presents more of a portability issue. It’s stored on the side of the base, and since it’s quite large, it can easily snag when putting away or taking out the laptop from a bag. What’s more, the magnetic attraction isn’t strong enough to prevent it from detaching completely in such instances.

(Image credit: Future)

You don’t get many ports on the Ultra Flip, which is understandable given that thin base, not to mention the space needed for storing the Tilt Pen. However, the Ultra Flip makes clever use of its limited real estate, as those aforementioned rear corners house two of the laptop’s three USB-C ports. This is a practical location, although it’s a minor shame that only one of them supports the Thunderbolt 4 standard (the other Thunderbolt 4 port is on the right side of the base).

The all-round performance of the Ultra Flip is respectable. It dispatches most workaday tasks without issue, from general browsing and productivity to 4K streaming and light gaming.

Despite being marketed for creators, though, it’s a little disappointing that the Ultra Flip only features integrated graphics. It’s also a concern that it failed to complete Puget Bench’s video editing benchmark — something one its nearest rivals, the MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+, also failed, by the by.

Having said this, I found its graphical performance reasonably impressive for a machine without a dedicated GPU. It ran Cyberpunk 2077 in a playable state, offering just enough visual fidelity and performance for a casual session.

What’s more, the Ultra Flip stays cool and composed during such workloads. Any heat that is emitted is confined to the very rear of the base, where you won’t feel it. Fan noise can make itself known, but it’s impressively hushed compared to others.

Perhaps the best part of the Ultra Flip, though, is its display. It’s as deep and as rich as you’d expect from an OLED, while the 3K resolution offers a crystal clear image. It’s also very bright, which helps to nullify any pesky reflections. The touchscreen and Tilt Pen are responsive and easy to use as well.

(Image credit: Future)

The keyboard allows for quick typing, thanks to the generous spacing of the keys, in addition to their light and shallow actuation. They can feel a little harsh when you hammer down hard, but otherwise they’re perfectly comfortable.

I found the touchpad occasionally encroached while typing, but this wasn’t egregious enough to disrupt productivity. In fact, its large size is actually a boon for such tasks, since it makes navigation that much easier. The pad also supports numerous gestures and functions, including the ability to adjust system brightness and volume by sliding up and down on either side. These ‘sliders’ feature haptic feedback that I didn’t find particularly engaging, but at least doesn’t make the controls unusable.

The battery life of the Ultra Flip is very impressive, lasting 18 hours when playing back a movie on a continuous loop. There aren’t many laptops that can beat this, although the Prestige 14 Flip AI+ is one of them; this lasted over 30 hours in the same test, which is quite astonishing.

In many ways, MSI’s 2-in-1 is a close rival to the Ultra Flip, but I believe the latter has the edge in key categories. Its display is superior and it lacks the same touchpad frustrations.

HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 review: Price & availability

(Image credit: Future)

• Starts from $1,459.99 / £1,299 / AU$3,399
• Available now in two colorways
• Reasonable price for the spec

The HP OmniBook Ultra Flip starts from $1,459.99 / £1,299 / AU$3,399 and is available now in two colors: blue and grey. Various configurations are possible, with Intel Core Ultra 5, 7, and 9 CPUs available, while RAM ranges from 16GB to 32GB and storage options from 512GB to 2TB.

Considering the spec and design, the Ultra Flip is reasonably priced for a 2-in-1 laptop. The nearest equivalent model, the MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+, costs a similar amount, and likewise features an Intel Core Ultra 7 and a 1TB SSD. There are differences, though: the Prestige has a much lower display resolution, but double the RAM (32GB) and unparalleled battery life, outlasting the Ultra Flip and many of the best touchscreen laptops by a wide margin.

If you’re after a considerably less expensive 2-in-1 and don’t mind forgoing Windows, the Acer Chromebook Spin 312 is worth considering. This is among the best Chromebooks around for those on a tight budget, thanks to its build quality, compact form, and impressive display. You’ll have to provide your own stylus, though.

HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 review: Specs

Base

Review

Max

Price

$1,459.99 / £1,299 / AU$3,399

$1,629.99 / £1,499 / AU$3,699

$2,099.99 / £2,099.99 / AU$3,999

CPU

Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (up to 4.5 GHz, 8 cores)

Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (2.2GHz, 8 cores)

Intel Core Ultra 9 288V (up to 5.1GHz, 8 cores)

GPU

Intel Arc Graphics (integrated)

Intel Arc Graphics (integrated)

Intel Arc Graphics (integrated)

RAM

16GB LPDDR5x

16GB LPDDR5x
Aus: 32GB LPDDR5x

32GB LPDDR5x

Storage

512GB PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD

1TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD

1TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD

Display

14-inch 3K (2880 x 1800),16:10, OLED, 120Hz, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Touchscreen

14-inch 3K (2880 x 1800),16:10, OLED, 120Hz, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Touchscreen

14-inch 3K (2880 x 1800),16:10, OLED, 120Hz, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Touchscreen

Ports and Connectivity

3x USB-C (2x Thunderbolt 4, 40Gbps, Power Delivery, DisplayPort 2.1; 1x 10Gbps, Power Delivery, DisplayPort 1.4a), 1x combo audio; Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4

3x USB-C (2x Thunderbolt 4, 40Gbps, Power Delivery, DisplayPort 2.1; 1x 10Gbps, Power Delivery, DisplayPort 1.4a), 1x combo audio; Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4

3x USB-C (2x Thunderbolt 4, 40Gbps, Power Delivery, DisplayPort 2.1; 1x 10Gbps, Power Delivery, DisplayPort 1.4a), 1x combo audio; Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4

Battery

64Wh

64Wh

64Wh

Dimensions

12.4 x 8.5 x 0.6 inches (314 x 216 x 15mm)

12.4 x 8.5 x 0.6 inches (314 x 216 x 15mm)

12.4 x 8.5 x 0.6 inches (314 x 216 x 15mm)

Weight

3lbs / 1.34kg

3lbs / 1.34kg

3lbs / 1.34kg

HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 review: Design

(Image credit: Future)

• Super thin
• Premium build quality
• Incongruous stylus storage

The Ultra Flip exhibits an understated but fetching design. I especially liked the dark blue colorway of my review unit, departing from the monochromatic crowd (although a grey finish is also available). I also liked the angular back corners, which add interest and serve a practical purpose that I’ll explain later.

It feels more premium than many others in the space, too. The aluminum body is as sturdy as you’d expect, a feat that’s all the more remarkable given just how thin the whole unit is. Meanwhile, the lid is both easy to adjust and perfectly stable once in place.

The downside of this construction, though, is the weight. The Ultra Flip is noticeably heavier than some of its plastic rivals, and while it’s still perfectly fit for backpacks or suitcases, those who are fastidious about traveling light might feel let down — literally.

Other portability issues arise courtesy of the included stylus, HP’s MPP 2.0 Tilt Pen. It’s quite large and thick, which makes it cumbersome when stored on the side of the laptop, as it has a tendency to catch and fall off when you're depositing and retrieving the laptop from a bag. It can often fall off completely in such cases, since the magnets aren’t strong enough to keep the pen in place.

(Image credit: Future)

I also experienced times when the pen would rotate towards the underside of the base whenever I lifted the Ultra Flip up, resulting in it being crushed when I set it down again.

Having said all this, there’s plenty to like about the Tilt Pen’s design. That sizable form makes it easy to hold, while its two buttons are generously proportioned and well placed, which makes them easy to operate with your writing hand. And while the pen doesn’t support wireless charging, the USB-C port is at least discreetly locked away behind an elegant sliding mechanism.

For such a thin laptop, you mightn’t be surprised to learn that the Ultra Flip’s port selection is limited. There are no USB-A ports, which might cause peripheral-heavy users some headaches, since even the best mice and keyboards today still employ the standard in their dongles.

There are three USB-C ports, though, and the Ultra Flip deploys a clever space-saving trick with two of them, as they’re integrated within those aforementioned rear corners. What’s more, this placement helps to keep any connected cables out of the way, as well as making it easy to locate each port without having to crane your neck to see exactly where they are.

It’s a shame, though, that these two corner ports differ in their specification. The one in the right corner is Thunderbolt 4 — which supports 40Gbps transfer speeds, Power Delivery and DisplayPort 2.1 — while the one on the left isn’t, only supporting 10Gbps transfer speeds, DisplayPort 1.4a, and lacks fast charging.

It would be more convenient if both corner ports were Thunderbolt 4 to accommodate a wider variety of locations of monitors and power sources that require it. Instead, the other Thunderbolt 4 USB-C port is located on the right side of the base, which is less practical.

HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 review: Performance

(Image credit: Future)

• Sharp and rich OLED display
• Unintrusive yet noticeable fan noise
• Responsive touchscreen and stylus

HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 benchmarks

3DMark: Night Raid: 34,738; Fire Strike: 8,935; Steel Nomad: 602; Solar Bay: 16,161; Solar Bay Unlimited: 12,751; Solar Bay Extreme: 2,101; Solar Bay Extreme Unlimited: 2,193
Geekbench 6.5: Multicore: 10,906; Single-core: 2,743
Cinebench R23: Multi Core: 8,806; Cinebench R24: Single Core: 118; Multi Core: 530
Crossmark: Overall: 1,705; Productivity: 1,642; Creativity: 1,935; Responsiveness: 1,305
Passmark Overall: 6,194; CPU: 21,831.3; 2D Graphics: 638.9; 3D Graphics: 5,038.6; Memory: 2,844.4; Disk: 47,357.1
BlackMagicDisk: Read: 3,543MB/s; Write: 3,707MB/s
HandBrake 4K to 1080p: 51.82fps
Total War: Warhammer III: 1080p, Medium: 47fps
Total War: Warhammer III: 1800p, Ultra: 12fps
PCMark Battery Test (Modern Office): 15 hours and 33 minutes
Battery Life (TechRadar movie test): 18 hours and 2 minutes

For everyday use, the Ultra Flip is highly capable. It can handle light productivity and entertainment with ease, including multi-tab browsing and 4K video streaming.

I was also surprised by how well it gamed, despite lacking a dedicated GPU. It ran Cyberpunk 2077 at the Ray Tracing: Low preset in a state that was playable, if very rough-and-ready. It’s certainly not going to trouble the best gaming laptops, but for some quick fun, it suffices.

However, it failed to complete Puget Bench’s benchmark for Adobe Premiere, due to a certain GPU effect being unable to render. I had this same problem when I tested the MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+, which also has no dedicated GPU, so I suspect this shared aspect is the culprit in both cases. Video editors, therefore, might want to look elsewhere.

At times, the fans can emit a noticeable amount of noise, even when moderate workloads are being conducted. However, the sound is low-pitched and more hushed than that of other laptop fans, which makes it less grating. Extreme temperatures are kept at bay, too, with any heat generated confined to the very rear of the base.

(Image credit: Future)

The widescreen OLED display is one of the Ultra Flip’s highlights. The 3K resolution is gloriously sharp, while colors are deep and rich, with that typical OLED contrast living up to its acclaim. Some reflections are revealed under suboptimal lighting conditions, but I found the high brightness levels available were often enough to combat them effectively. What’s more, the touchscreen is responsive and accurate, making it great to use with fingers or the Tilt Pen.

The keyboard of the Ultra Flip is very light and snappy, which makes for quick and easy typing. The ultra low profile of the keys also helps in this regard, although those who hammer away might find them a little harsh, due to their lack of dampening. There are plenty of useful shortcuts on the F row, but the lack of a number pad or even a navigation cluster hampers productivity.

There are no such issues with the touchpad, though. Its silky-smooth surface combined with its large surface area makes it easy to navigate with. What’s more, it supports plenty of gestures, although they’re somewhat hidden away, requiring the use of the preinstalled HP app to enable them.

There are even two ‘sliders’ either side of the touchpad, used to control volume and brightness respectively. They feature prominent haptic feedback that emulates notches as you make your adjustments, similar in feel to those of a scroll wheel. These can feel a little at odds with your actual finger movement, lacking the level of responsiveness I would’ve liked. The clicking sound produced is also quite loud and not particularly pleasant. However, these are minor quibbles, and the controls work well overall.

HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 review: Battery life

(Image credit: Future)

The battery life of the Ultra Flip is very impressive. HP claims it can last just over 16 hours unplugged, but this figure is something of an underestimate. When I played back a movie on a continuous loop, it actually managed to sustain itself for 18 hours.

This puts it in league with the most enduring laptops around. Very few can outlast it, but one that can is MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+, another 2-in-1 machine. This managed over 30 hours, which is pretty much unbeatable in the laptop sphere.

Fully charging the Ultra Flip from empty took a little over two hours, which is also admirable.

Should I buy the HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14?

Category

Notes

Rating

Value

Considering all the quality and specs on offer, the Ultra Flip is good value for money.

4 / 5

Design

The supreme build quality is certainly welcome, although the unexpected heaviness and stylus storage issues are not.

4 / 5

Performance

The Ultra Flip performs well in many areas, even light gaming, although video editors might be disappointed. The excellent OLED display is exceptional, though.

4 / 5

Battery Life

Among the best in class. Only a few can outlast it.

4.5 / 5

Final Score

The HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 is very well made and performs well in most areas, with the OLED display being the true highlight. Only a few minor flaws blemish this otherwise competent, convertible laptop.

4 / 5

Buy it if…

You want a great display
The 3K OLED display is every bit as sumptuous as you would hope. The touchscreen functions very well, too.

You want a premium build
The uber-thin design oozes class, while the formidable aluminum body is reminiscent of the best MacBooks, which is high praise indeed.

Don't buy it if…

You prize lightness
Despite the thin body, the Ultra Flip is actually quite hefty, so those who want to pack as light as possible might be a shade disappointed.

You want plenty of ports
With only three USB ports (all of which are Type-C) and a headset jack, you’ll need a hub if you’ve got plenty of connections to make.

HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 review: also consider

MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+
The MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ is comparable in many ways to the Ultra Flip, including on price. There are some key differences, though. It has a much smaller stylus, and a much tidier storage solution for it — which also features wireless charging. However, I had a real issue with its touchpad ‘sliders’ misfiring, something I didn’t experience with those on the Ultra Flip. Read our full MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ review.

Acer Chromebook Spin 312
A considerably cheaper 2-in-1, the Acer Chromebook Spin 312 is ideal for those on a budget. Granted, you won’t be getting the power and versatility of a Windows machine, but this compact Chromebook is great for basic tasking. Its display is crisp and its touchscreen perfectly usable, although you’ll have to provide your own stylus if you don’t want to use your fingers. Read our full Acer Chromebook Spin 312 review.

How I tested the HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14

(Image credit: Future)

• Tested for several days
• Used for a variety of tasks
• Laptop reviewing experience

I tested the Ultra Flip for several days, during which time I used it for a variety of tasks, from browsing and productivity to content streaming and gaming. I also ran our series of benchmarks, designed to reveal the true capabilities of a device. I tested the battery life by running a movie on a continuous loop until it completely depleted.

I have plenty of experience reviewing laptops of all kinds, from small budget offerings to large and premium gaming machines.

• First reviewed: March 2026
• Read more about how we test

H2O Audio Sonar 2 Pro: Two-minute review

The H2O Audio Sonar 2 Pro are possibly the best possible headphones for serious swimmers. They secure onto a headband instead of having their own (and are very stable when in place), making them unique among H2O Audio’s offerings as well as setting them apart from the rest of our best swimming headphones. Since Bluetooth connectivity has trouble in water, H2O has added some features to get around that.

As good as the H2O Audio Sonar 2 Pro are for swimmers, they’re probably among the least interesting headphones for any other purpose. They only sound good underwater – this is by design, of course – and it’s still not quite an audiophile experience. And that form factor is very limiting. While some of our best running headphones list use bone conduction technology and can be used in water and on land, there are other options, even from H2O Audio, that I prefer for that purpose, such as the H20 Audio Tri 2 Pro, rated our best bone conduction headphones overall.

But for their intended purpose, you’ll be hard-pressed to do better than the H2O Audio Sonar 2 Pro. With that in mind, let’s dive a little deeper on why that is.

While I already had an idea of what to expect when I received these headphones, I was surprised by how small the box was – it’s not much bigger than the box AirPods come in – nor how small the soft-shell case inside was, which was basically the same size as the box.

The actual headphones came inside the case along with the folded up charging cable and a pair of waterproof earplugs. The headphones themselves, besides being fairly small, are unique looking because they have no headband of their own, just a thick, blue cable that goes behind one’s head connecting the drivers to each other.

The bone conduction drivers are each in black housing with a clip on the outside and three control buttons – the left has the Mode (switches between Bluetooth Mode and using internal storage in Memory Mode), forward and back, while the right has Play / Pause / Power, and Volume Up / Down.

(Image credit: Future / James Holland)

Since these are made for swimming, they have an IPX8 rating – about as good as it gets in any consumer product not meant for the Mariana Trench – so it can be underwater “up to 12ft/3.6m” without any restriction. If you’re considering these for serious diving, be warned the pressure in deeper waters could affect these headphones.

Also, since the H2O Audio Sonar 2 Pro are made for swimming, they come with a couple features meant to circumvent one of the biggest hurdles for using headphones while swimming. Bluetooth connectivity tends to become more intermittent the more water is between the source like a smart phone and headphones, so these headphones come with a built-in MP3 player with 8GB of storage.

Loading music onto these headphones then is reminiscent of loading music onto a phone as one might have done ten years ago, which is not the most convenient, using the included charging cable and connecting the headphones to a computer. That also means that you have to have the music you want stored in playable form like MP3 on your computer.

The H2O Audio Sonar 2 Pro do have an additional feature to make this more manageable that the non-Pro version doesn’t have, and that’s the Playlist+ feature. This feature lets the user load music onto the headphones wirelessly. Now, H2O Audio advertises this feature as a way to transfer a playlist, but that overcomplicates what this feature actually does.

Think of the Playlist+ feature like a tape recorder. Whether you do it through the headphones (you press the Volume Up button twice to start and stop recording) or the app, you basically start the recording process, press play on whatever music or podcast you want, and then stop it when the song is done. It won’t stop on its own, so you could potentially have multiple songs on one track. One thing that I do appreciate is that it will read the name and song title from the source and automatically name the file after it. It’s a nice work-around, if a little inelegant. It’s literally a digital version of pressing ‘record’ on a boombox to make a mixtape.

Regardless of whether you’re streaming through Bluetooth or listening to an MP3 in Memory Mode (aka the built-in MP3 player), the sound quality is the same. And it’s a bit strange. The way bone conduction headphones work affects the sound quality a little, since what you’re listening to is vibrating through your cheekbones into the inner ear instead of actually passing through your ear. So, everything sounds more intelligible when also wearing the included earplugs.

(Image credit: Future / James Holland)

It also sounds clearer when underwater. The listening experience is not quite HiFi, however. I’ve listened to H2O Audio products underwater before and I don’t remember them being as bass-heavy. Maybe it’s intentional to make the music sound more motivating but the low-end seems to be front and center to the point where a song like “In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida” sounds like a bass solo and songs with 808 drums like hip-hop and EDM are somewhat overpowered by the kick drum.

What’s strange is that there’s no real way to EQ the headphones in a way to offset it, especially if you’re using Memory Mode (you can always use an EQ on the phone for Bluetooth audio). That said, the mids and highs are fairly clear when underwater, so if H2O Audio adjusted their app to have some kind of EQ adjustments, I think these headphones would be even easier to recommend.

They’re still easy to recommend, despite that issue with the low-end. I haven’t really discussed fit yet, and while you’re somewhat at the mercy of whatever headband you use, when these slip on they’re incredibly stable. They don’t move. They don’t jiggle. I learned by struggling or thrashing my way through a couple laps in an Olympic pool to see what would happen. This is a big reason why they’re among the best swimming headphones.

There’s not else to write home about regarding the H20 companion app, other than to mention that it will give you a readout of battery life and let you navigate the songs stored on the device when in memory mode. You can also start the Playlist+ feature here.

Lastly, the 10-hour battery life doesn’t seem impressive compared to what we see on the best wireless earbuds, especially when you include the extra charges in their carrying case – something you don’t get with the soft shell case as it’s not a power source. But I think it’s actually a decent amount of juice for a swimmer.

H20 Audio Sonar 2 Pro: Specifications

Component

H20 Audio Sonar 2 Pro

Drivers

Bone conduction

Active noise cancellation

No

Battery life

Up to 9 hours

Weight

1.0 oz (29 grams)

Connectivity

Bluetooth 5.3

Frequency range

30Hz - 18kHz

Waterproofing

IPX8

Other features

8GB storage and MP3 player, Playlist+, App support

H2O Audio Sonar 2 Pro: Price and availability

(Image credit: Future / James Holland)

• How much does it cost? $149.99 / £117.00 / AU$234.00
• When is it available? Available now
• Where can you get it? Available in the US, UK, and Australia

The H2O Audio Sonar 2 Pro aren’t cheap, but the price is very respectable at $149.99 / £117.00 / AU$234.00. Considering the feature set and niche use, I could see a higher price (though I would hope H2O Audio would give more control over the EQ before that happens).

Many of the swimming headphones and bone conduction headphones end up going for at least the same price if not more. The Shokz OpenSwim Pro, for example, go for a slightly higher $179.95 / £169 / AU$299. They also have a built-in MP3 player but don’t have anything like the Playlist+ feature (which is a proprietary H2O feature). They also have the more typical form factor of a pair of bone conduction headphones with a sturdy but bendable headband.

Even the company’s own H2O Audio Tri 2 Pro Multi-Sport has a higher MSRP $199.99 / £155.68 (about AU$310). Of course, those are meant for a different purpose. They are sturdy and steady enough to swim in, but don’t clip in, as they’re meant just as much to run in. They do come with the Playlist+ feature as well.

• Value score: 4 / 5

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Value

The price tag for these headphones are pretty reasonable as one could definitely pay more for swimming headphones.

4 / 5

Design

Though a niche design, the H2O Audio Sonar 2 Pro are ideal for swimmers thanks to how secure they are.

4.5 / 5

Performance

The sound quality, though a bit bass-heavy, is clear underwater. Plus, the battery life is more than enough.

4 / 5

Average rating

It may be niche, but swimmers needing headphones that clip in will be thrilled with these.

4 / 5

Should I buy the H2O Audio Sonar 2 Pro?

(Image credit: Future / James Holland)Buy it if...

You’re a serious swimmer

The clip-on design make these about as stable as one gets for swimming. Add in the MP3 player and Playlist+ feature and you have ideal headphones for doing laps.

You want your playlist while swimming

The Playlist+ feature is very helpful for getting your playlist or any music / podcast you don’t own onto the headphones, and it’s a feature that one only gets with H2O Audio.

Don't buy it if...

You want bone conduction headphones for any other reason

If you don’t need headphones that clip into the headband of swimming goggles, then look elsewhere including H2O Audio’s other offerings.

You want convenience

If you don’t want to deal with plugging the headphones into your computer and transferring music or queuing up a playlist and running the Playlist+ feature, you’re missing out on a good portion of what sets these headphones apart.

Also consider

Shokz Openswim Pro

The Shokz Openswim Pro are waterproof with a comfortable and tight fit, even if they don’t clip into a headband, and come with a good nine hours of battery life. It’s not the most up-to-date of Shokz headphones but is still an ideal option for swimmers.

Read our full Shokz Openswim Pro review

H2O Audio Tri 2 Pro Multi-Sport

The H2O Audio Tri 2 Pro Multi-Sport aren’t cheap, but are worth it, especially for anyone also looking for headphones to use during swimming. After all, these are tailored to triathletes.

Read our full H2O Audio Tri 2 Pro Multi-Sport review

How I tested

• Tested over a couple weeks
• Listened to different genres of music
• Tested all the different features

I spent a couple of weeks testing the H2O Audio Sonar 2 Pro including a couple laps in an Olympic size pool as well as just hanging out underwater to listen to them. While using them, I listened to all sorts of genres from electronic and hip-hop to rock and acoustic music to get an idea of how they sound. I also tested the various features, most notably the Playlist+ feature.

After testing, it’s clear that these are ideal for serious swimmers, not only from the bone conduction but the form factor, which means that they’re as secure as a pair of headphones can be during a swim. Check out our guide to how bone conduction headphones work for more details on how headphones like these work.

I’ve spent the last few years reviewing audio equipment and have spent even longer using my critical ear as a listener and musician to understand what does and doesn’t sound good.

• First reviewed November 2025

Turtle Beach PlayTrek Travel Case for Nintendo Switch 2: review

The Turtle Beach PlayTrek Travel Case for Nintendo Switch 2 is the definition of eye-catching. From the very moment this model entered my line of sight, I was instantly drawn to it. Its lenticular exterior… its Donkey Kong Country-inspired look… its leaf-green handle… I simply had to get my hands on it.

And now, I finally have it in my clutches – the coveted DK case. But just how good is Turtle Beach’s lightweight Switch 2 case? Pretty damn good, actually.

See, I’ve tested a lot of cases for Nintendo’s latest hybrid console, including some that sit in our guide to the best Nintendo Switch 2 accessories, and some that… well, aren’t quite up to scratch. But one thing has frustrated me with the bulk of these cases. They just lack the playfulness and personality I’d associate with Nintendo.

Of course, that’s not a problem for the PlayTrek Travel Case, which is licensed by Nintendo itself. The Donkey Kong variant I tested is attention-grabbing, includes bold greens and red details, and has lenticular art that reveals multiple layers of trees from different angles. It’s a great-looking item, and the most bodacious I’ve seen so far.

If you’re not all too big on the Kong, fear not. There’s a lenticular Mario Bricks alternative, featuring the Italian plumber himself, or more basic colorways like Charcoal Black and Stellar White.

We’ve spoken a fair bit about looks, but just how practical is the PlayTrek Case for Nintendo Switch 2? Well, first of all, I’m a big fan of the main compartment, which is fitted brilliantly for the Switch 2 console. It’s not too tight of a squeeze, but it’s also very secure. You can flap the middle compartment over your system, and hold it in place with its hook and loop fastener. If you ever drop your case, then your console should be safe.

I touched on that middle compartment, and I have to say, Turtle Beach nailed it here. It’s equipped with twelve game card slots, which can hold either Switch or Switch 2 games. These slots mold to your cartridges with ease, and when I gave the case an almighty shake, they didn’t fall out. Twelve slots is also very generous – I mean, even the official Nintendo Switch 2 Carrying Case only has six. Sure, Nintendo's official case isn't as bulky overall, but in turn, you do get more room for your gaming gear from the PlayTrek Travel Case.

The final compartment – situated under the roof of the case – is pretty neat too. It contains a zip-up pouch that can be used to store a charging cable, Switch 2 camera, or Joy-Con 2 grips, but it’s a little too small to house a dock or larger accessory like the Turtle Beach Rematch Wireless Controller for Nintendo Switch 2, for example. This compartment is padded, however, meaning you get even more protection for your system.

(Image credit: Future)

In general, the PlayTrek case feels very durable. It’s got an EVA hard shell design ensuring it can survive a fair few drops, and it’s wrapped in TPU-coated polyester, helping it to weather everyday wear. When dropping the case from waist height multiple times, I couldn’t see any indication of damage, although the lenticular cover was a little susceptible to marks like fingerprints – a minor issue in the grand scheme of things.

Right, after all of this, you’re probably wondering whether there’s a catch. For example, it’s probably expensive, right? Well… no, no it isn’t. The PlayTrek Travel Case is typically priced at $29.99 / £19.99 / AU$39, making it cheaper than Nintendo’s official case – a model with fewer game card slots, protection, and storage space. I’ve even seen it go on sale recently, too, with a price cut to just $24.99 / £16.99 in the US and UK at the time of writing. That’s amazing value for money.

So, here we are at the end of it all. Did Turtle Beach’s DK-themed case meet my expectations? No, it didn’t. It surpassed them. With a durable build, excellent low price, charismatic look, and astute storage, this case is ideal for on-the-go use. Sure, it’s not large enough to fit your dock, but there are different cases specialized for that, like the Nintendo Switch 2 All-In-One Carrying Case and Nacon Protection Case XL for Switch 2. Bravo, Turtle Beach, you weren’t monkeying around with this one.

(Image credit: Future)Turtle Beach PlayTrek Travel Case for Nintendo Switch 2 review: price & specs

Price

$29.99 / £19.99 / AU$39

Dimensions

11.8 x 6.1 x 2.3in / 300 x 155 x 58mm

Weight

0.8lbs / 378g

Number of game card slots

12

Compartments

3

Handle

Yes

Color

Charcoal Black, Stellar White, Donkey Kong, Mario Bricks

(Image credit: Future)Should I buy the Turtle Beach PlayTrek Travel Case for Nintendo Switch 2?

Attribute

Notes

Rating

Design

Attractive lenticular exterior with fun look, well-built with hardy exterior, but can pick up fingerprints quite easily.

4.5/5

Storage

Secure storage for Switch 2 console, loads of game card slots, handy pouch, not quite big enough for dock or larger accessories.

4.5/5

Value

Phenomenal low price for a case with this much quality and personality.

5/5

Buy it if…

You want a case that stands out from the crowd
The PlayTrek Travel Case is available in an eye-catching array of designs, but my favorite has to be the Donkey-Kong-themed model. Its lenticular artwork and vivid use of color make it a true joy to behold.

You’re looking for excellent durability
This case isn’t just a looker, though; it’s also very durable. Its EVA hard shell design will keep your Switch 2 safe from the odd drop, and the TPU-coated polyester protects against daily wear. On top of that, the case's padded interior and fitted build will keep your system secure and in place, even if you’re taking a bumpy ride.

Don’t buy it if…

You need a case to house your dock
This model isn’t the largest around, so it won’t quite fit your Switch 2 dock or some other larger accessories. If that’s what you need, check out my top suggestion in the ‘Also consider’ section.

You’re easily bothered by fingerprints
Like a lot of its fellow cases, the PlayTrek Travel Case is fairly susceptible to picking up fingerprints. If markings like that tend to rub you the wrong way, it may be worth looking at an alternative, like a soft case. The Hori Puff Pouch for Nintendo Switch 2 is an option that springs to mind.

Turtle Beach PlayTrek Travel Case for Nintendo Switch 2 review: also consider

Nintendo Switch 2 All-In-One Carrying Case
OK, this one’s pricey, but stick with me here. If you need a case that’s large enough to house your dock, a Pro Controller for Nintendo Switch 2, and all of the necessary wires and accessories, this is the ultimate pick. Nintendo’s official all-in-one case doesn’t have the hardest exterior, but it’s highly scratch-resistant, has individual compartments for your gaming gear, and is all you need for heavy-duty on-the-go gaming.

Read my full Nintendo Switch 2 All-In-One Carrying Case review.

Hori Adventure Pack for Nintendo Switch 2
If you want something a little different, then check out this cross-body option, the Hori Adventure Pack for Nintendo Switch 2. It’s a great value-for-money pick with plenty of room for your console and accessories, and can be used with a shoulder strap or traditional handle.

Read our full Hori Adventure Pack for Nintendo Switch 2 review.

How I tested Turtle Beach PlayTrek Travel Case for Nintendo Switch 2

(Image credit: Future)

• Tested over the course of multiple days
• Took it with me to the office and performed durability tests
• Trialled by a Switch 2 owner and life-long gamer

I spent multiple days testing the Turtle Beach PlayTrek Travel Case for Nintendo Switch 2, taking it with me to the office for my workplace’s weekly Mario Kart World showdown.

During my time testing, I made sure to try filling the case with my Switch 2 system, games, and accessories, and performed durability tests to ensure the case performed its job effectively. I even compared it against my go-to model, the official Nintendo Switch 2 Carrying Case, on aspects like design, storage space, and ruggedness.

More generally, I’ve spent two years reviewing products here at TechRadar, and have lots of experience testing Nintendo Switch 2 accessories. I’ve tested a huge amount of cases, alongside screen protectors like the Genki Aegis Shield, cameras including the Hori Piranha Plant Camera for Nintendo Switch 2, and controllers like the Turtle Beach Rematch Wireless Controller.

• Read TechRadar’s reviews guarantee
• First reviewed: March 2026

Ninja Power Duo Immersion Blender with Whisk: one-minute review

The Ninja Power Duo Immersion Blender with Whisk does just what you'd expect, based on the name. The device comes with two different attachments, one for blending and one for whisking. The attachments are easy and intuitive to swap out. You can use the provided container or use just about any pot, bowl, or container you'd like. Make your favorite sauces, smoothies, whipped food, and more. The Ninja Power Duo Immersion Blender with Whisk offers three power levels.

Working with an immersion blender is a bit different from a standing blender; you need a bit of coordination to get everything blended properly. You need to hold down the power button as you blend, use an up and down motion, and use another finger to toggle the speed up or down. I ended up with some tiny ice shards in some of my smoothies, but further blending probably would have taken care of that.

Cleanup couldn't be easier. The motor/handle can be wiped down with a damp cloth if needed. All other parts can be popped into the dishwasher (top rack) or hand-washed with warm soapy water. All of the parts are light and easy to stash away, freeing up valuable counter space for other appliances.

Ninja Power Duo Immersion Blender with Whisk: price and availability

• List price: $79.99 (about £60 / AU$113)
• Widely available online and in stores

The Ninja Power Duo Immersion Blender with Whisk can be found at many major retailers across the US, both online and in stores. You can purchase it at Ninja's own website or at Walmart, Target, Macy's, Amazon, and many more. There are two color options: Dark Gray, which you can see in my photos, and Deep Navy. Additional accessories available for purchase include a 3-cup Power Chopper and 4-cup Blending Pitcher.

• Value score: 4.5/5

Karen Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / FutureNinja Power Duo Immersion Blender with Whisk: specifications

Price

$79.99

Power levels

Low, medium, and high

Parts included

Power base, whisk attachment, blender attachment, 3-cup blending container and lid

Container material

Plastic

Additional accessories available

3-cup Power Chopper and 4-cup Blending Pitcher

Color options

Deep Navy and Dark Gray (as seen in my photos)

Ninja Power Duo Immersion Blender with Whisk: design and features

• Use provided container or just about any other
• Three blending speeds
• 750-watt motor

The clever design of the Ninja Power Duo Immersion Blender with Whisk allows it to be used in a lot of different situations. From blending sauce on the stove to cottage cheese in its own container or whisking egg whites in a shallow bowl, this appliance offers a lot of flexibility. The provided 3-cup plastic container is handy and even has a lid for storing leftovers. The blending blade is surrounded by a splatter shield to minimize mess as you blend.

Other thoughtful touches include the ease with which you can swap out the blending blade and whisk. All parts that contact food are designed to be dishwasher-safe, which makes cleanup super easy. They can also be easily hand-washed if you prefer.

The power button must be held down as you use the device, which takes a bit of coordination, especially if you change speeds while blending. It does take some getting used to, but I can't fault Ninja for that choice: it is clearly a safety feature.

(Image credit: Karen Freeman / Future)

• Design score: 5/5

Ninja Power Duo Immersion Blender with Whisk: performance

I tested the Ninja Power Duo Immersion Blender with Whisk on a number of different foods. I blended pasta sauce, hummus, smoothies, frozen yogurt, and cottage cheese. I whisked egg whites. It handled everything well without excessive mess or noise.

I made some pasta sauce from canned whole tomatoes. I placed the immersion blender directly into the pot on the stove. In less than a minute, the tomatoes were blended into a smooth puree. I was a little nervous that I'd end up with sauce all over my stove, but that was not the case at all.

Karen Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / Future

I made two different smoothies, one with frozen cherries, almond milk, and yogurt and another with frozen mangoes and fruit juice. Both came out smooth and delicious.

Karen Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / Future

I also made some different "frozen yogurts," which are similar to smoothies but with frozen fruit, ice, yogurt, and no liquid, so they are a bit more challenging for blenders. I made a banana-peanut butter flavor, banana-chocolate, and cherry. The banana versions also included some hemp seeds and protein powder. All of the seeds and powders blended up smoothly. I did get the occasional ice shard; I probably could have taken more time to be sure I blended every inch.

I blended the cherry one directly in the yogurt container (which only had about a half-cup of yogurt left at the bottom.) I just added frozen cherries and blended for a super-simple and healthy dessert.

Karen Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / Future

I had about half a container of cottage cheese and I blended it right in the container. Just a few seconds turned the curds into a smoother texture, which I later used to make a chia pudding.

Karen Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / Future

I made an ultra-simple hummus with ingredients I had on hand: a can of chickpeas (rinsed and drained), lemon juice, olive oil, cumin, garlic, and salt. It actually came out delicious, though I suspect that the addition of tahini would have made it even better and smoother.

Karen Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / Future

I've never actually whipped egg whites before, but the whisk attachment made it super easy. The pictures below speak better than words. It was kind of magic.

Karen Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / Future

• Performance score: 4.5/5

Should you buy the Ninja Power Duo Immersion Blender with Whisk?Ninja Power Duo Immersion Blender with Whisk report card

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Value

You can't call it cheap, but it does a good job for the price.

4.5/5

Design

It's well-designed to do its job; cleanup and storage are super easy.

5/5

Performance

It does a thorough job both blending and whisking. Even immsersing it in small containers, I rarely made a mess.

4.5/5

Overall

It's smallish but mighty!

4.5/5

Buy it if

You need a compact, hand-held blender powerful enough to crush ice

Don't let the size fool you, this immersion blender makes quick work of smoothies, sauces, and more. It might miss a few bits of ice here and there (though maybe that's my impatience talking) but overall, it does the job.

You want cleanup to be easy

All of the parts that contact food can be popped into the dishwasher or quickly hand-washed.

You want a powerful whisk, too

Easily swap out the immersion blender arm for a whisk and you've got yourself a power whisk for frothing up eggs, cream, and more.

Don't buy it if

You want gravity to do the work

This is an immersion blender, so you'll need to hold down the power button as you move the blender up and down. Toggling between low, medium, and high speeds while you're doing that takes some coordination.

You need a higher-power blender

At 750 watts, it should be powerful enough for most things, but you may find it lacking if you want ultra-smooth and silky smoothies.

You want to purchase just one blender-type appliance

If you plan to have just one blender in your kitchen, this might not cover all of your blending needs. You might prefer a standing blender or one that comes with more attachments.

Ninja Power Duo Immersion Blender with Whisk: also consider

If the Ninja Power Duo Immersion Blender with Whisk isn't exactly what you're looking for, you might consider the following:

Vitamix A3500

I've made space on my counter for a powerful Vitamix for well over a decade. It's the ultimate for ultra-smooth smoothies and more.

Read our review of the Vitamix A3500

Breville the All in One

If you want even more than what the Ninja Power Duo Immersion Blender with Whisk has to offer, add a food processor and you'll have an idea of what the Breville All in One has to offer.

Check out our review of the Breville the All in OneView Deal

How I tested the Ninja Power Duo Immersion Blender with Whisk

• I tested both attachments and all three power levels
• I made a variety of beverages and foods
• I cleaned it after every use, both by hand and in the dishwasher

I blended pasta sauce that started with a can of whole tomatoes. I made a simple hummus with a drained and rinsed can of chickpeas, lemon juice, olive oil, garlic, and spices. I made several different kinds of smoothies and frozen yogurt with ice and/or frozen fruit, some of which included powders and seeds. I blended cottage cheese, right in its container. I whisked egg whites until they formed peaks.

Read more about how we test.

Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2: review

The Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 is the sequel to the audio specialist’s 2017-issue mini Bluetooth speaker. And according to Bose, this palm-sized follow-up brings a fair few enhancements to the table: ‘improved audio performance’, ‘enhanced features’, and ‘extended battery life’. But is it actually worth buying? Here are my thoughts after several weeks of testing.

First of all, it has to be said that the Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 is a significant improvement over its predecessor — as you’d probably hope given that they were released eight years apart. Now, you get USB-C charging, and up to 12 hours of battery life, which is nothing special, but comparable to some similar-sized rivals from JBL and Ultimate Ears.

On top of that, its new and improved fabric strap is fantastic — it’s so easy to sling around shower heads, bikes, bags… you name it. Pair that with a still-great IP67 dust and waterproof rating — which enables the SoundLink Micro Gen 2 to survive being dunked under a meter of water for 30 minutes — and you’ve got a speaker that can go literally anywhere with you. Combine this with its small size and lightness of build, and Bose’s bijou audio companion is more practical than just about any model out there — even those listed in our best Bluetooth speakers guide.

Something else that has been improved is audio quality. And in fairness, the Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 is a pretty solid-sounding model given its small size — but that’s not to say it’s perfect.

(Image credit: Future)

Bose has gone for a relatively balanced sound profile on the SoundLink Gen 2. Bass is pretty punchy, but never boomy or overstated. Mids are clean, but not the sole star. And treble is energetic, but not tinny — unless you’re listening at top volumes, but that’s something I’ll get onto later.

Anyway, when listening to Black Eye by Allie X, I was impressed by the tonality of vocals, and the way that the speaker replicated their almost breathy quality. The attack of violins in the intro wasn’t the most dynamic I’d heard, but it was certainly clean and distortion-free at mid volume levels. And after bumping bass up by a level on the Bose app, the pumping low end came through with decent impact too. Was I wowed by excellent instrument separation, pounding low-end performance, and top-tier detailing? No. But that’s to be expected on a speaker this small.

While we’re on this topic, it’s worth noting that the Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 has a fair few sonic limitations, as a direct result of its compact form. You won’t get the bass thump that larger models — like the Bose SoundLink Plus, or even the Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2 — can muster. And if you push volume all the way to the maximum, you’re going to get pretty thin-sounding audio, with very noticeable compression and slightly shrill treble. But in this model’s defense, this is fairly standard for mini Bluetooth speakers — trust me, I’ve tested tons of them!

But still, this model did perform well, all things considered. In Felini by Venerus and Marco Castello, the precision of fingerpicking guitars and airy sound effects was commendable, and the two vocalists' harmonies intertwined neatly.

Deeper tracks, like M-High’s Never Would don’t sound amazing on the SoundLink Flex Gen 2, as it struggles to handle the darkest parts of the frequency range. Still, standing upright, the speaker managed decently agile bass, and matched the track’s aggressive treble to good effect. Rivals like the Ultimate Ears Wonderboom 4 can produce a more weighty performance, but if you’re not listening to the heaviest tunes, that shouldn’t be a problem for you.

I’ll finish talking about sound by mentioning that the Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 has strong codec support, with SBC, AAC, and even aptX Adaptive — if you’ve got a compatible device that is. There aren’t any wired playback options, though I suspect most users will be fine with using Bluetooth 5.4 connectivity.

So, the SoundLink Micro Gen 2 sounds pretty solid overall, but how does it perform elsewhere? Let’s step on over to the features domain.

This model isn’t doing anything out of the ordinary by Bose 's standards. It has multi-point connectivity, fast-pairing, and a shortcut button for Spotify or linking with another Bose speaker. And you can link with various other Bose speakers, luckily, including another SoundLink Micro Gen 2 for stereo, or models like the Bose SoundLink Max for generally bigger sound.

However, you can also rename the speaker in the Bose app (mine’s called Bite Size Party), enable or disable voice prompts, and alter EQ. As we’ve seen with many Bose products, the EQ settings are a little basic, with presets to boost or dampen bass or treble, and a three-band equalizer to adjust the bass, mids, and treble. However, this still works decently well.

I would’ve liked to have seen some more interesting features, like a personalized EQ test for more tailored audio, or hands-free calling, seen on the original SoundLink Micro (which had a built-in mic), but this model still has a good feature-set all in all.

Perhaps my favorite thing about this speaker, though, is its design. I’ve already mentioned its excellent fabric strap, which I’ve been using to attach the speaker to my shower, but there’s more. It has well-sized, responsive button controls, a rubber body that’s drop-resistant, and a classy range of color options. I used the Black version, but I’m partial to the Blue Dusk, Petal Pink, and Sandstone alternatives. Ultimately, this is a great-looking, compact, and waterproof speaker that really can go anywhere with you.

(Image credit: Future)

Still, there’s one thing that holds me back from recommending the Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 outright: its price. This model comes in at $129 / £119.95 / AU$179.95, which is a lot for a speaker of this size. For reference, you can get our pick for the best Bluetooth speaker overall, the JBL Flip 7, for $149 / £129 / AU$179 at full price. And that model is considerably more powerful, offers far superior audio with awesome bass, and has more features to explore too. It’s also regularly discounted, and although it's a little larger, remains highly portable.

Even if you wanted something as small as the Micro Gen 2, you could go for the JBL Clip 5, which retails for $79.95 / £59.99 / AU$89.95, or the bass-heavy Ultimate Ears Wonderboom 4 for only $99.99 / £89.99 / AU$149. I’m not convinced that the Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2 offers sound that’s good enough to warrant the extra cost. All of these other models are highly waterproof, sound strong, and look great to boot. So, even if Bose’s speaker performs fairly well across the board, it feels like a slightly tough sell.

And there you have it. The Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 is a very solid upgrade on its predecessor, and I was satisfied by its thoughtful design and improved sound quality. Ultimately, though, it doesn’t feel exceptional enough — either sonically or in terms of features — to earn its steep price-tag, meaning that I’d only recommend this above rivals — from the likes of JBL and UE — if you can get it on sale.

(Image credit: Future)Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 review: price & release date

• List price of $129 / £119.95 / AU$179.95
• Released in August 2025

The Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 released in August 2025, eight years after its predecessor, the Bose SoundLink Micro. It comes in with a list price of $129 / £119.95 / AU$179.95, which represents a $10 / £20 / AU$30 increase over the original, at their respective launch points. However, there are a lot of improvements on this second model which make it the better pick over its ancestor. The SoundLink Micro Gen 2 is available in Black, Blue Dusk, Petal Pink, Sandstone, or Twilight Blue.

Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 review: specs

Weight

0.7lbs / 0.3kg

Dimensions

1.7 x 4.1 x 4.1 inches / 43 x 104 x 104mm

Connectivity

Bluetooth 5.4

Battery life

12 hours

Speaker drivers

1x dynamic driver, 2x passive radiators

Waterproofing

IP67

(Image credit: Future)Should I buy the Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2?

Attribute

Notes

Score

Features

All the essentials are here, battery life is OK, but no mic and underwhelming EQ options.

3.5/5

Sound quality

Clear audio, with good codec support, but noticeable compression at higher volumes and size-related limitations hold it back.

4/5

Design

Durable yet stylish, with great waterproofing and a practical fabric strap.

4.5/5

Value

High price for its size, and rivals offer far better bang for your buck.

2.5/5

Buy it if…

You want a speaker that you can take absolutely anywhere
The Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 is small, lightweight, highly waterproof, and comes with a handy fabric strap. You really can take it anywhere with ease, and that’s one of its greatest qualities.

You’ve got more of Bose’s recently released models
If you have speakers like the Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2, the Bose SoundLink Plus, and the Bose SoundLink Max, then you can easily pair this model with one of those. You can also pair the SoundLink Micro Gen 2 with an identical unit for stereo sound.

Don’t buy it if…

You want the best sound quality
Look, the Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 sounds good for a speaker of its size, but it didn’t blow me away. And if you want better sound quality, you could go for a similarly-priced model like the JBL Flip 7, which produces phenomenal all-round audio with far better bass.

You’re looking for the best value option
Off the back of that last point, I’d argue that the Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 isn’t a great value-for-money option. Small models like the JBL Clip 5 and UE Wonderboom 4, which I’ve listed below, would get my recommendation. I’d also say that the JBL Grip is worth checking out, if you want something with lighting and a super-sleek look.

Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2 review: also consider

Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2

JBL Clip 5

Ultimate Ears Wonderboom 4

Price

$129 / £119.95 / AU$179.95

$79.95 / £59.99 / AU$89.95

$99.99 / £89.99 / AU$149

Weight

0.7lbs / 0.3kg

0.6lbs / 0.3kg

0.9lbs / 0.4kg

Dimensions

1.7 x 4.1 x 4.1 inches / 43 x 104 x 104mm

3.4 x 5.3 x 1.8 inches / 86 x 134.5 x 46 mm

4.1 x 3.8 x 3.8 inches / 104 x 95.3 x 95.3mm

Connectivity

Bluetooth 5.4

Bluetooth 5.3

Bluetooth 5.2

Battery life

12 hours

12 hours

14 hours

Speaker drivers

1x dynamic driver, 2x passive radiators

1x 45mm full-range driver, 1x passive radiator

2x 40mm active drivers, 2x passive radiators

Waterproofing

IP67

IP67

IP67

JBL Clip 5
The JBL Clip 5 is a cheap, small, yet great Bluetooth speaker. It has the same IP67 rating as Bose’s mini model, the same battery life, and similar dimensions. It sounds surprisingly good, has a few EQ modes, and can clip onto anything, from bikes through to hooks. Read our full JBL Clip 5 review.

Ultimate Ears Wonderboom 4
The UE Wonderboom 4 is easily one of my favorite small Bluetooth speakers, and one that punches well above its weight. You get far punchier bass than its Bose rival can muster, and generally clean audio all round. Pair that with a striking design, excellent waterproofing, and a solid 14-hour battery life, and you’re looking at a great option. Read our full Ultimate Ears Wonderboom 4 review.

How I tested the Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2

(Image credit: Future)

• Tested over the course of multiple weeks
• Used in our music testing space and while showering
• Mainly tested using Tidal

I spent multiple weeks testing the Bose SoundLink Micro Gen 2, and spent hours listening in our music testing space at Future Labs, at home, and in the shower.

Most of the time, I listened to tunes via Tidal, on either my Samsung phone or the Nothing Phone (4a). To begin with, I ran through the TechRadar testing playlist, which features tunes from a wide range of genres, but I also made sure to bump tracks from my personal library. I also tried using party mode, by connecting the speaker to my Bose SoundLink Flex Gen 2.

More generally, I’ve tested more than 40 Bluetooth speakers here at TechRadar, and personally curated our guide to the best Bluetooth speakers. I’ve reviewed all sorts of models, from premium Bose units, through to budget-friendly alternatives like the Tribit PocketGo. As a result, I have a strong understanding of the segment, and know exactly what it takes to stand out in a highly convoluted market.

• Read TechRadar’s reviews guarantee
• First reviewed: March 2026

AndaSeat Xtreme Series Standing Desk: one-minute review

As a first attempt at a budget-oriented standing gaming desk, there are certainly positives for AndaSeat to draw on here. Still, it's clear it could use some refinement moving forward, and in some areas, it does feel rather rushed. Before we get to the bad, let's cover the feature set, shall we?

As standard, you get solid height adjustment ranging from 28.7in to 46.1in (73 - 117cm), multiple width options, with both 47.2in (120cm) and 55in (140cm) variants available, and a choice of colors too (black and white, albeit the white variant is only available at that larger size).

AndaSeat's also included a digital display and control panel (super easy to use), which comes with three separate profiles you configure and save multiple heights on.

Cable management on the whole is a bit of a mixed bag, although there is a cable caddy fixed to the back of the desk below where the monitor would sit, for UK and US plugs. The gaps between it and the desktop, when fully installed, are too tight to actually thread them through.

If you're plugging or unplugging devices into an extension lead back here, you're going to effectively need to unscrew it from the desk before you can do that. That's a shame because AndaSeat's included a metric ton of cable management adhesive tie-off points and cable ties, too, to help with your clean desk endeavors. Oh, and you get, well, a plastic cup holder and a headphone stand that you can screw to it, and that's about it.

Overall design is a mixed bag. It's not entirely square like most modern desks, but actually leans into an older, early 2010s office vibe, with this curved front, which, although perhaps more ergonomic, looks slightly dated in contrast to the cleaner, sharper aesthetic of more modern alternatives. There's also a cutout behind the monitor to allow you to run cables through, which is a nice touch, but that front arch may put many off, as it does make it stand out in a more modern office environment.

The biggest win, though? The price. At $500 US for the white 55-inch variant, and $400 for the smaller 47-inch, it's one of the most affordable standing desks on the market, at least one that's purposely designed for gaming anyway.

(Image credit: Future)AndaSeat Xtreme Series Standing Desk review: Price and Availability

• Costs $400 / $500, around £297 / £370, or AU$562 / AU$703
• Currently only available via AndaSeat's webstore in the US
• Multiple sizes and black/white versions available

Right now the Xtreme series is only available for purchase via AndaSeat's webstore directly, it comes in two sizes currently, either the 47.2in (1.20cm), or 55.1in (140cm), although if you look in AndaSeat's instruction manual for the Xtreme series, there's also mention of a 63in (160cm) version listed too, so I suspect that'll land with us sometime in the future.

This is actually one of the cheapest standing desks out there, specifically designed for gaming, beating out the likes of Corsair's Platform:4 series (which starts at $700), and Eureka's Ergonomic GTG as well ($600). Although it's worth mentioning that both of those do have quite a few more extras than the Xtreme line does here.

AndaSeat Xtreme Series Standing Desk review: specs

Price

$400/$500 around £297/£370, or AU$562/AU$703

Height

28.7in / 73cm (up to 46.1in / 117cm)

Load capacity

154lbs / 70kg

Material

Cold-formed Steel, Laminated MDF

Dimensions

47.2 x 29.5in (120 x 75cm) or 55.1 x 29.5in (140 x 75cm)

Noise level

<50db

AndaSeat Xtreme Series Standing Desk review: design and features

• Solid build quality
• Easy(ish) assembly, but could be easier
• Some features need a rethink

Standing desks are inherently fraught products to launch. It's a difficult market to break into. Not only is it a niche within a niche, but competition is so tight these days that you really do need to bring something special to the table.

When Corsair first launched its Platform line, it was all about those added extras, monitor arms, Elgato support, and all the bells and whistles you'd expect from a company like that. Secretlab came in with all the RGB you could imagine, and Eureka had that funky, curved, angled, glass top thing that you either love or hate (or smash in one bad Valorant run).

AndaSeat's offering is markedly different. The added extras are relatively minimal; in fact, in many ways, it does feel like the company grabbed a Desktronics HomeOne standing desk frame, popped its branding on it, added a curved MDF top, a few optional extras, and called it a day. That's a real issue as it seriously struggles to stand out as a result.

The finish on the desk is just about serviceable as a result of that. It's a laminate MDF top, with a speckled matt coating in black or white. Our sample had a few chips on it and the odd grubby mark too (likely because it shipped all the way to the UK from China), but it's just not that exciting.

The curve in it is similarly highly divisive. It doesn't necessarily look that great by modern standards, and although it is ergonomic and gets you a little closer to your monitor compared to some offerings (these things always seem to be super deep by comparison to most 60cm / 24in desks), it would have been much better served against the current competition with just a flat edge.

(Image credit: Future)

And then there's the cable management, which, honestly, in many ways does feel like the biggest afterthought on this whole project. The gap between the metal cable caddy in the rear and the top of the desk is just ridiculously tight. I cannot thread a UK plug through there, and even if I could, struggling to then try and insert that into the extension lead itself, cramming my wrist through the gap, while haphazardly trying to see what I'm doing while I do it, just feels like a recipe for disaster. Even with that height adjustment.

What's interesting is that AndaSeat's animated GIFs and videos littering the product page actually show that as being almost hinged, like you can drop it down on one side to access the extension load, which honestly would be fantastic, but you can't. It's secured in place with four Allen key screws, and that's it. You could loosen two and bend it down, but you'd likely be damaging that MDF top in the process.

Then there's the cupholder and the headphone holders included as well. Both of which are plastic. A quick glance at the imagery here, and you'll spot I didn't install them. Why? Because they just don't look premium at all. Cheap white shiny plastic with a mottled finish? No, thank you. They certainly don't match the white top finish, that's for sure.

Also missing from the product page is the under-desk PC holder and an elevated monitor stand, too, which would have been nice additional extras to see at least somewhat available on launch. That does make me wonder if the launch itself was rushed to hit a particular quarter, rather than when the product was ready.

Otherwise, building it is, although quite the time consuming process, easy enough to do as long as you follow the instructions; there's not a whole lot that can go wrong here, and the desk frame itself is impressively durable once you've finished with it.

(Image credit: Future)AndaSeat Xtreme Series Standing Desk review: performance

• Multi-profile settings are impressive
• Cable management needs work
• Load capacity is limited

On to the good news, then, once the desk is built, certainly in white, it does look remarkably clean, particularly with the Mac setup I have running on top of it. Now, admittedly, I am testing this in a coffee roastery, but it does fit the whole aesthetic here beautifully, and it'll work just as well in a spacious office, as long as you don't mind that curve I mentioned earlier.

The profile settings and height adjustment, too, are super sleek. There's a child lock on here, and it's incredibly smooth when you're adjusting the height as well. Setting specific profile heights is a doddle (simply pick a height, then press S, and the profile number you want to set it to), so if you do want to swap it on the fly, you can do so super quickly and easily.

As mentioned, cable management, though, leaves a lot to be desired. Not only is the cable tidy tray a pain to deal with, but I feel like the power setup for the height adjustment monitor could have been hidden a bit better as well. If the legs came pre-assembled with the power cable running through them directly, you could have hidden the kettle lead it requires in the top of the desk, rather than at the base of one of the legs.

Total rated load capacity is also quite light, too, at just 154lbs / 70kg. It's certainly considerably less capable than the Platform:4 (330lbs / 150kg), and even the more budget-friendly Secretlab Magnus Evo (264lbs / 120kg). That said, I did sit my own 176lbs / 80kg of weight on it, and it didn't snap in two, so who knows. This is likely a precaution due to the motors and that 18mm thick MDF that sits on top, so don't overdo it if you do invest in it.

(Image credit: Future)Should I buy the AndaSeat Xtreme Series Standing Desk?Buy it if...

You're in the US after a cheap entry-level standing desk
With multiple sizes and a relatively low entry point its remarkably affordable. Best-case scenario, you fall in love with multiple height adjustments; worst-case scenario, you've got a nice, comfortable, deep desk to sit at

You don't want fancy RGB or additional features
It's simple, remarkably so, and in some ways that's a positive, not a negative; there's no overtly gamer emphasis on display here, which is a win in some arenas.

You want curved ergonomics
You'll either love or hate that front curve, but if you're willing to take a chance on it, it does provide a modicum more ergonomic freedom than a standard flat desk

Don't buy it if...

You're looking for something a little more premium
Although it's impressively affordable, AndaSeat's cut some serious corners to make that a reality, from the MDF top to the cheap accessories.

You value good cable management
It's technically there, but you almost have to strip the desk down to get access to your extension leads again.

Also consider...

AndaSeat Xtreme Series

Corsair Platform:4

Secretlab Magnus Pro

Price

$400/$500, around £297/£370, or AU$562/AU$703

$699.99 / £799.99 / around AU$1,600 or $899.99 / £999.99 (Elevate) / around AU$2,000

$799 / £770

Height

28.7in / 73cm (up to 46.1in / 117cm)

29in / 74cm (up to 48in / 122cm Elevate)

25.6-49.2in / 65-125cm

Load capacity

154lbs / 70kg

330lbs / 150kg

264.6lbs / 120kg

Material

Cold-formed Steel, Laminated MDF

Steel, laminate / birchwood

Steel, wood fiberboard

Dimensions

120 x 75cm (47.2 x 29.5in) or 140 x 75cm (55.1 x 29.5in)

29in / 74cm x 47in / 120cm x 30in / 76cm

59.1 x 27.6 x 25.6-49.2in / 150 x 70 x 65-125cm

Noise level

<50db

~50db

N/A

Corsair Platform:4
The ultimate high-end gaming desk, ideal for creators and those who crave high-quality materials and Elgato support. It's expensive, yes, but the functionality feels almost endless.

For more information, check out our full Corsair Platform:4 review

Secretlab Magnus Pro
A rival for the Platform:4, but in a Secretlab package? Probably, with exceptional cable management, a great built-in controller, sleek, professional, and with a ton of magnetic accessories, it's seriously slick.

For more information, check out our full Secretlab Magnus Pro review

How I tested the AndaSeat Xtreme Series Standing Desk

• Built and used by hand, solo wherever possible
• Extensive work in an industrial environment
• Direct comparisons made to similarly priced competitors

I actually requested the Xtreme Series be shipped directly to a coffee roastery I work at, for two reasons primarily. Firstly, so it could be used in a working capacity (managing a coffee roastery is a hectic business), and secondly, to act as a coffee tasting table for clients and guests, to see if its versatility extended beyond just the technical capacity.

With direct feedback from multiple clients and colleagues, and used in a wide range of activities for multiple weeks, both gaming, working, and in an industrial capacity, it gave me a fantastic idea of just how this desk contends not only with modern standing desks, but also in more taxing environments.

First reviewed February 2026

Read more about how we test

Ready or Not 2: Here I Come is a direct continuation of the 2019 horror comedy Ready or Not, and a sequel I was very surprised to see on our new movies list.

When I rewatched the original movie on Disney+, I was reminded how great it is. Laugh out loud funny, plenty of shocking moments, and a concluding line that's just perfect. With that in mind, I thought it would be a great standalone movie.

But this is the horror genre, folks. We never seem to get just one movie, do we? Sequels are everywhere, some good, some bad. When it comes to Ready or Not 2: Here I Come, I'd consider it to be decent for what it is, and there's plenty to like about it.

When we pick up, it's right after the ending of the first movie. After surviving the deadly game of hide and seek, resulting in the deaths of her husband and in-laws, Grace (Samara Weaving) wakes up cuffed to her hospital bed. She's not going anywhere because she's now a suspect in the deaths, considering they all, you know, exploded except for her. Very suspicious.

Of course, we know that Grace was innocent, and she was due to be sacrificed to the devil Le Bail, as part of the family's deal with him. And you thought your in-laws were bad, huh?

Anyway, police interrogation would feel like a walk in the park compared to where Grace ends up. After briefly reuniting with her sister Faith (Kathryn Newton), the two are kidnapped, where they learn that the wealthiest and most influential families on Earth have to kill both of them in a new game, or they'll risk losing their power and fortunes.

So, the games begin again. Admittedly, there are plenty of fun sequences here, especially if you want some gruesome kills, which are arguably better than the ones in Ready or Not. Best seen with a crowd, these are definitely crowd pleasers.

The new additions to the cast are very fun to watch, too. Sarah Michelle Gellar stars as Ursula, opposite her on-screen twin, Titus (played by Shawn Hatosy). Horror legend David Cronenberg rounds out this truly awful family as Chester, the patriarch of the Danfords. It was great seeing him in front of the camera, and he's as good there as he is behind it, directing body horror masterpieces such as The Fly.

Gellar has so much fun in this role, too, a far cry from her role as Buffy Summers (no one talk to me about the Buffy reboot cancellation, by the way). She's evil here, and has a blast doing it, as she joins the others in trying to hunt down Grace and Faith.

The movie is strong because of its ensemble cast, which is worth the theater trip alone. Elijah Wood stars as "The Lawyer", an equally fun role that you definitely haven't seen him in before.

Despite all these positives, though, the sequel does feel unnecessary and convoluted in places as the lore has now expanded to accommodate these new families and rules, to the point where it feels a bit silly, even for a horror comedy.

This would be a good place for Ready or Not to stop, in my opinion, as you can easily watch the two back to back and have a good time doing it. Adding another installment with more stakes and more games would feel like a too many cooks situation.

You will very likely have fun with this movie due to its cast, kills, and tense moments. But it does build to a conclusion that never reaches the highs of its predecessor, so unfortunately, round two is by far the weakest.

That doesn't mean it's terrible, though, just don't expect to be blown away like you were last time.

The Kobra range of 3D printers has continued to impress over the years, and while the aesthetic design of their open-frame Cartesian machines has until now been very workshop-like, the reliability and quality of the prints have never failed to impress. So much so that there are still two old Kobra 2’s still running. They might not be the best machines compared to the latest releases, but after three years, they’re still running strong.

The Kobra X is a further progression forward in quality and design, which really started with the Kobra 3 Combo it’s just now the level of quality, along with the touch screen interface, speed and precision, all take another step forward. Anycubic are running to catch up like all others with the market leaders Bambu Lab, and to offer a solid alternative to the dominance of the Bambu Lab A1.

However, by taking on the A1, the Kobra X has had to refine the Anycubic 3D printers that have come before, and they’re not the only manufacturer that is playing catch-up with similarly cheap and excellent machines such as the Creality Hi, which again, for the price, is another outstanding cheap option. These printers are all very much now on a par; they don’t bring anything other than refinement to the older Cartesian style of FDM bed slinger printers.

What the Kobra X does is stamp Anycubic once again as a serious manufacturer in the 3D FDM arena, with a machine that improves the design quality and function. At this entry level, it’s essential that manufacturers get things right, as these are the machines that will endear users to their product lines. That’s why it seems for around the $300 / £300 mark, you’re getting a machine with literally all the features.

This does mean that any 3D printer at this level has to be simple to use, robust, reliable, aesthetically designed and when it comes to the prints, they need to be good, accurate and multicolored.

The market at this level is packed, and more importantly, the machines at this price point already have a solid and proven track record. Any of the best 3D printers I've tested for entry-level users need to compete needs to impress from the outset.

Getting started with the Kobra X instantly showed that the design and quality were on a par with the competition, and once a few updates and the calibration had run its course, the machine was up and running, the first few prints highlighting that the Kobra X was more than capable of standing its ground against the Creality and Bambu Lab machines.

Anycubic Kobra X: Price and Availability

The Anycubic Kobra X is currently only available directly from Anycubic US and Anycubic UK stores, priced at a discount $299 / £259 right now.

Combo versions are also available. If experience is anything to go by, expect this 3D printer to reach Amazon in the near future.

Anycubic Kobra X: Design

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

Anycubic has progressed the design of the Kobra machines significantly over the years, and comparing the old Kobra 2 against the latest X, you can see how the design and innovation of the latest model are worlds apart.

Yet, like those older machines, the Kobra X retains the older Cartesian style of design and sees the filament and print area open. While this means that for enthusiasts and those just starting out, you get to see the print being built, for those looking to use more advanced materials, the lack of an enclosure and controlled build area temperature limits the material choice.

Still, for beginners and hobbyists, that material restriction is probably a good thing, and after you’ve mastered the ways of PLA and PETG, you can then progress to the Kobra S1.

As it is, while the frame may be open, it’s been properly product designed and looks, as well as the machines usability compared with past models has all taken a leap forward.

Again, the gantry feels good and solid, and Anycubic has once again worked on the quality of the Cable routing, so less of the workings are on show.

While the design is still open, the motors and power adapter, belts and wiring are all, for the most part, hidden away. The 3.5-inch touch screen is also intuitive and easy to navigate, with the ability to load prints via USB or through the Anycubic Slicer software wirelessly.

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

The physical size is also relatively compact, with the four filament spools being mounted on the horizontal top bar, enabling easy accessibility. If you want the filament in a dry box, then you can couple the printer with the Ace 2 Pro, in fact, up to four of these filament boxes to enable 19 color printing.

When it comes to the dimensions, it measures in at 455.4 x 445.3 x 461.3 mm with the filaments adding to the height. Weight-wise, this is a printer that is easy to move around if space is limited, and without the filaments, it weighs 12.7kg or 18 kg for the combo model. The Ace 2 Pro will add an additional 4.8 kg per unit.

While the weight can quickly build like its competitors at the base level, it’s still very manoeuvrable and easy to carry and store. The build area is also pretty decent at a perfect 260 × 260 × 260mm, meaning that there’s plenty of room for a good amount of projects.

One of the other big design features is the Ace Gen 2 print head with a new extruder, cutter and multifilament system that helps to cut down on the filament purge compared with other systems.

• Design: 4.5/5

Anycubic Kobra X: Features

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)Specs

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

Print Technology: FDM
Build Area: 260 × 260 × 260 mm
Minimum Layer Resolution: 0.05 mm
Maximum Layer Resolution: 0.30 mm
Dimensions: Approx. 500 × 500 × 580 mm
Weight: Approx. 9.5 kg
Bed: Heated aluminium build plate (up to 110°C)
Print Surface: Textured PEI spring steel flex plate
Software: Anycubic Slicer (Cura-based) + Wi-Fi / App / Cloud support
Materials: PLA, PETG, TPU, ABS
Print Speed: Up to 600 mm/s

At first look, the Kobra X follows the same lines of design as the other new bed slingers. Everything is a little neater and less DIY workshop, and it isn’t just the aesthetics; these new machines leap forward with the technology and features as well.

The first point to note is that for those on a budget, the machine, with discounts, can be purchased for around $299 / £259, and for that price you have the ability to print in 4 colors. That is discounted from the usual $399 / £359, but when discounted that makes it £100 less than the competition. That price point is just the start, with several different combo options that then see the price hit a peak of $1148 / £987 with four Ace 2 Pro boxes and the ability to print up to 19 colors.

Like the S1, there’s also the ability to quality swap out the nozzle for different diameters, with the machine arriving with a standard 0.4mm and options for diameters from 0.25 through to 0.8mm. What also stands out here is that many of the parts can easily be swapped out, most notably the Ace Gen 2 print head.

Compared with Anycubic's previous multicolor Cartesian printers, this new system is double the speed and saves more filament through filament purging. It can also print 4 colors out of the box with the option to print an additional 15, taking the total to 19 colors.

The machine also builds in AI detection, which enables perfect first-layer printing, and if any issues are detected, the machine will stop before any damage is caused.

Out of the box, thanks to the new print head, the machine can also print PLA and TPU (68D) simultaneously, enabling you to print far more complex models. This type of feature is more common in multi-tool head printers and not common in single-nozzle systems like this.

A feature that I’ve seen expanding across almost all manufacturers is the ability to monitor and control the printer remotely. Again, while this isn’t a unique feature, the fact that it’s included on a portion of this print point is exceptional.

Anycubic make a big point about the new Ace Gen 2 technology, which features a 52% reduction in the distance between the filament cutter and nozzle and an 81.25% reduction in filament change length, ultimately reducing the time between filament swaps and the amount of filament that needs to be purged.

The most interesting point about this head is that it features an adaptive extrusion force compensator, which adjusts the extrusion force based on the filament hardness so that PLA, PVA and softer TPU can all be extruded without manual adjustment between filament swaps. This means you can print with the following combinations: PLA + TPU, PLA + PVA or TPU + TPU.

One of the other features that stands out, despite its simplicity, is the fact that the spools for the four colors are mounted above the machine. This means that although you do need to have quite a bit of headroom, for smaller workshop areas where desk space might be limited, this four-color solution retains a small footprint.

Print speeds can reach a maximum of 600mm/s with the default being an impressive 300mm/s. As a speed test on the machine, the USB is loaded with a fast 3DBench model that prints in a little over 14 minutes, which by any standards is fast.

Once again, the machine features the latest version of Anycubics LeviQ 3.0 levelling system with 49-point auto-leveling, Flow Dynamic Calibration, and Vibration Compensation. The heat bed has also been redesigned to ensure an even spread of heat under the platform.

The AI detection has a few key new features that I was keen to test. The first, as always, is the spaghetti detection, but then the new object skipping is of real interest. The spaghetti detection will stop the printer if something goes wrong and spaghetti strands of filament start to appear.

Object Skipping is something new. This essentially skips a print that’s failed, so if you have a series of parts printing on the same bed and one fails, usually that means that all will fail. However, once the camera detects a failure, it skips it and continues the rest of the prints without returning to the failed one.

• Features: 4.5/5

Anycubic Kobra X: Performance

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

The Kobra X is one of the most straightforward Bed Slingers I’ve assembled and took a little over five minutes to unbox and build. Once powered up and the calibration steps were run, which takes around 30 minutes, then the printer is set to go.

On the first run, I checked the first layer accuracy, and once finished, the sheet of plastic that had been extruded was of exceptional quality, peeling back to reveal an even and well distributed layer of filament. The next few test models were all from the supplied USB key, and as expected, these ran through without issue.

I then progressed to my own custom test models, all initially single filament. While Anycubic had supplied a 3DBenchy model on the USB, this was highly optimised to enable fast printing, so I loaded my stock version and was able to get a decent model in around 33 minutes with a clear surface and decent structure.

As I progressed through the test, pushing 4 kg of filament through for a variety of parts and projects, the printer remained consistent, and at all times, the four filament spools were left exposed to the elements rather than being protected in dry boxes. The printer was able to withstand the workshop temperatures, which could dip to around 10ºC at night.

Checking out the Autodesk / Kickstarter quality test proved that the printer, despite its price, is an exceptional value considering the quality that it is capable of printing. The highlight here is the dimensional accuracy, which I have seen with other Cartesian printers often appears to be more accurate than many Core XY printers.

Across the board, the quality tests were exceptionally good, and considering the price and the fact that it natively prints with four colors and can support up to 19, as well as having the ability to print with two materials, TPU and PLA, makes this printer an exceptional value for money.

Through the test, there were a couple of points that caused an issue. The first is that if your filaments don’t include the Anycubic RFID chip, then it isn’t always straightforward to update the printer as to what’s loaded in and a bit of fiddling was needed, essentially scanning an Anycubic reel and then popping on a third party. However, using the Anycubic FDilament with the RFID chips, loading and using a multitude of different material options was exceptionally simple.

Benchmark results

Dimensional accuracy - score of 4

Target 25 = X: 25.83mm / 0.17mm Error | Y: 25.01mm / 0.01mm Error
Target 20 = X: 19.86mm / 0.14mm Error | Y: 19.81mm / 0.19mm Error
Target 15 = X: 14.75mm / 0.25mm Error | Y: 14.87mm / 0.13mm Error
Target 10 = X: 9.79mm / 0.21mm Error | Y: 9.88mm / 0.12mm Error
Target 5 = X: 4.91mm / 0.09mm Error | Y: 4.87mm / 0.13mm Error

X Error Average = 0.172
Y Error Average = 0.116
X&Y Error Average = 0.144

Fine Flow Control - score of 2.5
Fine Negative Features - score of 5
Overhangs - score of 4
Bridging - score of 5
XY resonance - score of 2.5
Z-axis alignment - score of 2.5

Adding up the totals gives a final score of 25.5 out of 28.

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

One of my other major selling points from Anycubic about this new models is the speed and reduction of filament waste. While actual print speed is increased, the new iteration of the slicer software, AnycubicSlicerNext (Kobra X), doesn’t seem to reflect the speed change compared with the AnycubicSlicer (Kobra 3) software, often quoting the Kobra 3 and Kobra X having similar print times.

Going to multi-color printing, and this is where the machine comes into its own. Again, like print speeds, the software doesn’t seem to highlight the waste difference between this and the Kobra 3; however, after printing, while the filament piles are similar, the X does have a slight filament pile reduction compared to the Kobra 3.

Having run four 1 Kg spools through the system, I’ve been impressed by the dimensional accuracy, speed and surface quality. I would, however, highlight that the print platform should be cleaned regularly.

The platform's surface, while offering good adhesion, does need to be cleaned and seems slightly more prone than usual to finger grease, so just something to be aware of. As an open-framed 3D printer, while there are limitations on what you can print, the overall performance is exceptionally good.

• Performance: 4.5 / 5

Anycubic Kobra X: Final verdict

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

The Anycubic Kobra X is one of the latest highly refined multi-color printers that offers a huge amount of potential. The quality of the build and design is a huge step forward from what I’ve seen in the past from the open design printers, but then, with the likes of the BambuLab A1, which was launched back in 2023, no manufacturer can get away with producing a printer that looks like it’s been put together in a workshop.

The workflow has been smoothed out, and once calibrated, which is of course all handled by the printer, as long as you ensure you maintain the rails and keep things clean after every print, the reliability is superb.

There are a couple of points on the maintenance of this printer. The first is to make sure that the print surface is always given a wipe over with an isopropyl alcohol (IPA) spray and a lint-free cloth.

The other point, which is especially relevant with this and other multi-filament printers, is to clear away the filament waste pile after, and even during, each print. Those tiny piles of filament can get stuck in various parts of the printer, so don’t let them pile up.

The filament waste issue is as ever apparent, but at present, with the design that’s pretty standard and at the price that is the price you pay.

Ultimately, for a printer that is so cheap, the potential and print quality of the Kobra X is superb, and at a competitive price point, it is at present the best value in a crowded field.

Should you buy the Anycubic Kobra X?

Value:

Incredible value for money for a multifilament printer with upgrade potential for even more filaments

5

Design:

Older Cartesian design, but refined, fast and reliable

4

Features:

AnyCubic has thrown every feature going at the Kobra X, camera, advanced auto levelling, and multfilament printing

4.5

Performance:

Fast performance for the design and decent print quality with easy multifilament printing

4

Total:

Outstanding value and one of the cheapest 3D printers at this quality on the market

4.5

Buy it if...

You need multifilament printing.

Able to print with four filament colors straight out of the box, the potential is impressive for a printer at this price, wit hth eability to add more filament boxes when needed.

You want a cheap 3D printer.

At present no other printer can compete when it comes to features and price.

Don't buy it if...

You don’t like filament waste.

Like so many printers of this type, filament waste is a problem when multifilament printing.

You print with advanced materials.

While the printer is exceptional in so many ways, the open design means that it’s not suitable for printing advanced materials such as nylon and ABS.

For more crafting essentials, I've also tested out the best laser engravers

Minisforum MS-02 Ultra: 30-second review

The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra is a compact mini workstation aimed at business professionals who need desktop-grade power but lack the space for a full-sized workstation.

The first thing that struck me as I lifted the MS-02 from the box was that, for such a small machine, it’s incredibly heavy at 3.45kg, which instantly gives you the hint that this is a serious piece of kit rather than your run-of-the-mill mini PC.

The matte black chassis is discreetly designed, with plenty of cooling vents running across the casing. There are also rubber feet on the base and side that let you easily orient the machine in either an upright tower or a flat desktop position. It looks and feels like a miniaturised version of a professional workstation rather than a standard Mini PC, and its full-metal exterior gives it a premium look and feel.

Checking the MS-02 reveals that this machine is the link between the Mini PC and the Desktop. It has the small size of a Mini PC but quite a bit of upgradability, including RAM, ROM, and an expansion slot. All of the upgrade potential can be easily accessed via the slide-out internal chassis.

This chassis is held in place by two thumb screws; once they are undone, the entire internals can be pulled out. You can then remove the internal modules, which do require tools, but once unscrewed and laid out, you have access to the SODIMM slots and M.2 bays. The layout and concept are similar to the old Intel NUC 9 Extreme (Ghost Canyon) Mini PC from a few years back.

The front ports are well laid out with two USB4 V2 Type-C ports running at 80Gbps, taking priority over the traditional pair of USB-A ports, and through the test with the LaCie Rugged SSD Pro5, I was impressed with the transfer rates enabling me to use the drive to edit 4K video on a drive that was essentially matching the speeds of the internal SSD.

On the rear of the machine, the ports are a little more sparse, but there are some good networking options alongside the three USB-A 10Gbps ports, HDMI 2.1 FRL, and unique to the 285HX machine that I’m reviewing, the dual 25GbE SFP+ sockets alongside the more standard 10GbE and 2.5GbE RJ45 connections. Essentially, for creatives, photographers and videographers working with high-speed network-attached storage such as the UGreen idx6011 pro, this is a great option.

Performance, even with the integrated Intel graphics, was unsurprisingly good throughout all tests, from Microsoft Apps through to editing 4K video in Premiere Pro. Once again, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX showed just how powerful it is, handling 4K editing in DaVinci Resolve and Premiere Pro without issue or pause on rough cuts, and then moving on to more in-depth grading.

Unsurprisingly, Lightroom Classic and Photoshop ran smoothly and, more impressively, handled large raw files from both the Canon EOS R5 C and the Hasselblad X2D II 100C with ease.

I did find that without a discrete GPU, the extended timeline rendering when editing video required a bit of patience, especially as you get further into the edit, but for the majority of users, whether you're an office worker looking for a powerful machine, a creative, a photographer or a videographer or a developer looking at the AI potential, there’s plenty on offer here.

The key point is that this machine is the base, and unlike some of the best mini PCs I've tested, it offers plenty of potential for upgrades. Out of the box, this is a very powerful workstation for development and power users handling large-scale data and spreadsheets. Add a GPU, and it becomes a very competent editing suite. Essentially, the machine's design enables you to adapt its configuration to suit your needs.

Minisforum MS-02 Ultra: Price and availability

• How much does it cost? From $1159 / £1039
• When is it out? Available now
• Where can you get it? Directly from Minisforum or Amazon

The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra is available directly from Minisforum's store, as well as online retailers such as Amazon.com, Newegg, and Amazon.co.uk.

Prices for the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX barebone starting at $1159 / £1039. A 32GB RAM and 1TB SSD configuration available at $1599 / £1455.

A fully specified 192GB DDR5 ECC and 2TB SSD variant is £2,679. There are also other versions of the machine available with an Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX or Ultra 5 235HX models, and these start at $599 / £559. As barebones, though they lack ECC memory, dual 25GbE networking, and the two additional M.2 slots exclusive to the 285HX.

• Value: 4.5 / 5

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)Minisforum MS-02 Ultra: Specs

CPU: Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
GPU: Intel integrated graphics
AI Engine: NPU
Memory: 4x DDR5 SODIMM slots (Up to 256GB, ECC supported (285HX only))
Storage: 2x M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe (up to 8TB each) + 2x M.2 on 25GbE NIC card (PCIe 3.0/4.0) 285HX only; up to 24TB total
Networking: 2x 25GbE SFP+ (Intel E810, 285HX only); 1x 10GbE RJ45; 1x 2.5GbE RJ45; Wi-Fi 7 (Intel BE200); Bluetooth 5.4
Front Ports: 2x USB4 V2 Type-C, USB-A 10Gbps; 3.5mm audio jack
Rear Ports: HDMI 2.1 FRL (8K@60Hz); USB4 Type-C (40Gbps); 3x USB-A 10Gbps, 2x 25GbE SFP+, 10GbE + 2.5GbE RJ45
Internal expansion: 1x PCIe 5.0 x16; 1x PCIe 4.0 x4; 1x PCIe 4.0 x16 (occupied by 25GbE NIC on 285HX)
OS: Windows 11 Pro
Dimensions: 221.5 x 97 x 225mm
Weight: 3.45kg (for the 285HX model)

Minisforum MS-02 Ultra: Design

The MS-02 Ultra is a serious-looking machine with simple styling and a black matte finish. The machine is larger than your average mini PC; however, it has been designed to be positioned either as a mini tower or laid flat on a desk, with quality rubber feet to support both orientations.

Despite being small, measuring just 221.5 x 97 x 225mm, the 3.45kg weight as I lifted it out of the box immediately signalled that this was something more than a standard consumer mini PC. It’s substantially smaller than a conventional tower workstation but larger than a Mini PC, and it draws on the design of both.

Build quality is excellent throughout. The casing is solid and made entirely of metal, reinforcing its premium aesthetics. It also makes it easy to mount within other furniture and equipment, with the tough metal casing ensuring it will look the part in any stylish office and out in the field if used as an on-site workstation.

The design feature that stood out is the slide-out internal chassis, which is secured in place by two thumb screws. Once these are removed (which takes seconds), the entire internal assembly slides out, giving you easy access to the SODIMM slots, M.2 bays, PCIe slots, and the cooling assembly. This style of access is more familiar to desktop users than to Mini PC owners.

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

On the front of the machine, there are two USB4 V2 Type-C ports at 80Gbps alongside a single USB-A port and a standard 3.5mm combo jack for a headset. At the rear, there are three additional USB-A ports, all 10Gbps; HDMI 2.1 FRL; a USB4 Type-C port at 40Gbps; and the 285HX's dual 25GbE SFP+.

Then there are the more common 10GbE RJ45 and 2.5GbE RJ45. When it comes to display output options, the choices are a little limited: either HDMI 2.1 or USB4. While this might not meet the demands of gamers in a professional setup, it should meet most people's demands.

Obviously, being a small workstation, heat can build up, and during the test, the fans kick in early to keep things cool. Given their small size, those fans are notably louder than those on a large workstation, which often run near silent.

I was interested to see if the metal casing also worked as a heat sink, but checking the casing surface, the temperatures under sustained load remained pretty cool, and while warm to the touch around the mid and lower sections, the heat from the internals seemed well distributed.

• Design: 4.5 / 5

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)Minisforum MS-02 Ultra: Features

The feature set of the 285HX model is where the MS-02 Ultra really sets itself apart from what we’d usually expect from a mini PC.

Even compared with the other model in the range, the 285HX with it’s flagship configuration adds ECC DDR5 memory support (error-correcting memory for greater data reliability), dual 25GbE SFP+ networking via an Intel E810 controller (two 25 gigabit Ethernet ports with SFP+ interfaces for advanced networking), and a fourth and fifth M.2 NVMe slot integrated onto the 25GbE NIC card (additional high-speed storage slots built into the network card).

That takes total on-board storage capacity to 24TB across four drives. The lower-spec 275HX and 235HX models share the same chassis but lose all three of these features, making the 285HX a much more capable model for more power-hungry users.

What these upgraded specifications mean in certain fields, such as creative, is an enhancement in workflow reliability, especially with ECC memory.

The storage options for a machine of this size are significant, with four M.2 slots that can be used independently either as separate drives for project, media, cache, and archive, for example, or you can choose to configure in RAID 0, 1, 5, or 10. This means you can potentially have 24TB of fast SSD storage appear as a single drive, and then offload that content to a NAS when ready.

It’s worth noting that the M.2 slots are limited to PCIe 4.0 rather than the newer PCIe 5.0 standard, which limits transfer speeds; however, in real-world creative workloads, this additional speed is rarely noticeable.

On the front, there are two USB4 V2 ports, which I was able to test with a LaCie Rugged SSD Pro5 external storage device, and the uplift in speed was significant, almost double that recorded on older USB 4.0.

Wired connectivity is the big network feature for this machine, but alongside is the Wifi connection. The machine handles Wi-Fi 7 using an Intel BE200 module. In testing against a Fritz! Box 5690 Pro: the raw throughput connection speed to drives connected to the wireless network was higher than on the Wi-Fi 6 network. But the connection's consistency and reliability were noticeably better.

Wired connectivity via the 10GbE port proved fast in studio use, and the fact that the machine also has 25GbE SFP+ ports offers future upgrade potential, especially for studios building high-speed NAS infrastructure, really highlighting that my network is ready for an upgrade.

The PCIe 5.0 x16 slot adds the ability to upgrade the machine and, to a certain degree, will future-proof your investment, with room for a low-profile GPU should the integrated graphics prove insufficient. This might be of particular concern if you have intensive rendering workloads.

The system also supports Intel vPro with BIOS-level KVM on the 285HX, enabling full remote management for 24/7 deployment, which is essential for larger corporations that will have home and remote workers.

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

• Features: 5 / 5

Minisforum MS-02 Ultra: PerformanceBenchmark scores

CrystalDiskMark Read: 6,136.46 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark Write: 5,338.79 MB/s
Geekbench CPU Single: 3,058
Geekbench CPU Multi: 18,366
Geekbench GPU: 19,645
PCMark Overall: 7,983
Cinebench CPU Single: 2,277
Cinebench CPU Multi: 35,080
3DMark Fire Strike Overall: 4,657
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: 4,799
3DMark Fire Strike Physics: 49,395
3DMark Fire Strike Combined: 1,806
3DMark Time Spy Overall: 2,315
3DMark Time Spy Graphics: 2,025
3DMark Time Spy CPU: 12,262
3DMark Wild Life Overall: 14,166
3DMark Steel Nomad Overall: 407
Windows Experience Index: 8.2
USB4 V2 External Read (LaCie Rugged SSD Pro5): 6,012.07 MB/s
USB4 V2 External Write (LaCie Rugged SSD Pro5): 4,053.44 MB/s

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX is an impressive CPU for a machine of this size, and the benchmark results reflect that. The Geekbench multi-core score of 18,366 and Cinebench multi-core result of 35,080 place this well within workstation territory, and the PCMark overall score of 7,983 confirms that real-world productivity performance is excellent across the board. SSD read speeds of 6,136 MB/s and write speeds of 5,338 MB/s from the installed NVMe drive are excellent for a PCIe 4.0 module, although, as mentioned earlier, it would have been great to have seen at least one PCIe 5.0 option.

In creative applications, the machine is ideal for working in a photography and video studio, being able to fit on a desktop neatly, and the size also makes it ultra portable if it does need to be installed into a movable workstation.

Through the test using Lightroom Classic and the power of the machine, it was able to manage large libraries and complex adjustments from Hasselblad X2D II 100C files without issue, and Photoshop ran large raw files with the same ease.

For video, DaVinci Resolve and Premiere Pro both handled rough cuts and colour grading of Canon EOS R5 C Log3 4K footage as well as any machine I’ve tried. As expected with integrated graphics only, timeline rendering on longer projects required leaving the machine to sit after each significant editing session, just to enable time for the timeline to render before applying grades and effects, essentially a build-and-render approach, which is common.

Loading several more demanding apps at once showed that multitasking abilities were handled well. Switching between Photoshop and Premiere Pro caused no lag, and running Microsoft Office applications alongside the creative suite also proved well within the machine's abilities. For five- to ten-minute 4K edits, at least the 64GB of ECC RAM in the review unit proved well balanced to the workload.

Another point here on the performance is the speed of the internal SSDs that are able to transfer the large amounts of data needed for video editing. The benchmark results returned a CrystalDiskMark Read speed of 6,136.46 MB/s and Write of 5,338.79 MB/s. What was impressive here was connecting the LaCie Rugged SSD Pro5 to the USB4 V2 External port on the front, which registered 6,012.07 MB/s read and 4,053.44 MB/s, showing a significant speed increase over standard USB 4.0.

Video editing can put a huge demand on all components in the machine, and thermal throttling can be a real issue. As I started to push the system, the fans kicked in early to help keep things cool, and while the volume of these remained low, they were noticeable, especially compared directly against my usual video workstation.

What this load did reveal was the performance held up over a five-hour editing session with no signs of throttling. The cooling solution inside, which consists of six heat pipes with phase-change material and a dual-fan chamber, managed the sustained processing loads on the electronics.

The GPU performance from the integrated Intel graphics was OK for all creative tasks during the test, but if you are considering this for any process that relies on a graphics card, then connecting an eGPU is going to be essential. The 3DMark scores with Fire Strike at 4,657 and Time Spy at 2,315 reflect the limits of integrated graphics rather than the CPU falling short. Reassuringly, there is room in the chassis for a dual-slot low-profile GPU, and the 350W internal PSU includes a spare 8-pin connector to power it.

Taking a break from testing, I tried out the game Indiana Jones and the Great Circle, which ran surprisingly well at mid-level settings, and far better than many gaming-focused mini PCs I've reviewed. It shows just how powerful that CPU is without the support of a discrete GPU..

One other note on the test: the dual 25GbE SFP+ ports were not tested during the review period due to the absence of a compatible 25GbE switch. A follow-up test is planned once the network infrastructure is in place.

• Performance: 4.5 / 5

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)Minisforum MS-02 Ultra: Final verdict

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

The Minisforum MS-02 Ultra and flagship 285HX variant that I’ve looked at in this review offers a substantial feature set for a machine of this size, which will give it wide appeal for businesses looking for a powerful and compact machine at a reasonable price.

Features such as the ECC memory, dual 25GbE networking, four M.2 slots, PCIe 5.0 expansion, and Intel vPro together add up to a platform that can serve as a creative workstation, a compact server node, a home lab host, or all three.

For larger businesses, the inclusion of Intel vPro means that they can manage the machine securely over a remote connection, which will be of definite appeal.

In the creative field and any photographer or videographer working with large-format files, this machine, with the combination of fast internal storage, high-speed USB4 V2 connectivity, and network offload via 10GbE or 25GbE, makes it an interesting choice, especially with the potential to pop in a discreet GPU. The small size of a machine with this power also means that it will be equally at home as a static desk machine or moved between locations.

There are a few downsides to the machine, and while there is a barebones version, even with the ready-to-go review configuration for many, this will just be the base machine. The out-of-the-box storage of 1TB fills quickly in creative workflows, and upgrading to 4TB or more will be essential.

Then there’s the Intel Graphics that actually proved to be pretty powerful through the test; however, if you are working with graphics or anything that requires the GPU for processing, then a card will need to be added.

The 64GB RAM of the review unit was well matched to the workloads I ran through the test, but anyone running this as a server or AI platform, or editing longer projects, will want to boost the RAM to 128GB or higher configurations. Once those upgrades are factored in, the total cost climbs rapidly and starts to have a value closer to a lower-end full-sized workstation.

Essentially, the small size of the machine and the price make it a viable option; it’s just worth keeping in mind that the out-of-the-box configuration is just the start, and what you install for your workload will add cost. However, even at the top end of Mini PC models, there’s nothing to compete with this flexibility, and even the cheapest workstation is going to be significantly larger, which makes this a great solution all round.

Should I buy the Minisforum MS-02 Ultra?

Value

PC, but budget for upgrades should be factored in to unlock full potential. 

4.5

Design

Slide-out chassis and full metal casing are robust and look great.

4.5

Features

Unique 285HX feature set and upgrades are unmatched at this form factor

5

Performance

Ultra-fast CPU and performance across the board, with upgrades available if more power is needed. 4/5

4.5

Overall

Work Stations can be phenomenally expensive, this gives you a powerful base at a great price to build on

5

Buy it if...

You need a compact workstation.

The 285HX CPU, ECC memory, and four M.2 slots make this a great desktop replacement for creative and professional workloads.

You're building a high-speed studio or home lab. 

The fast network options, including the dual 25GbE networking and PCIe expansion, make this an option as a network node or dev machine.

Don't buy it if...

You need GPU performance. 

Without a discrete GPU, sustained rendering and GPU-intensive tasks will be limited; however, a GPU can be added.

You want simplicity

The barebone configuration requires investment and some technical knowledge to configure optimally.

For more options, we've tested and reviewed the best mobile workstations and the best business computers.

Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro: 30-second review

The Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro is a compact, rugged tablet designed for outdoor professionals and trades, and is available at an incredibly low price. What makes this impressive is not just the price but the bright yellow design detailing, screen, and build quality.

Considering the relatively low price, the quality of the build and materials is genuinely good, feeling solid and robust which is reinforced by the IP68, IP69K and MIL-STD-810H certifications. Visually, the design highlights the rugged credentials with the usual hardened rubberised corners synonymous with this tablet style.

Unlike many rugged tablets I’ve looked at in the past, this design avoids the bulk and ugliness that often come with heavy-duty certification. The bright yellow accents and ribbed backplate give it a distinctive look, and the Corning Gorilla Glass 3 screen has a slightly matte finish that makes it easy on the eye and comfortable to read in a range of lighting conditions.

With an 8.68-inch screen and a lowish-profile bezel, it comfortably fits in one hand, and, coupled with a weight of 540g, it all feels well-balanced for a certified rugged device. The 860-nit display is also more than bright enough for outdoor use, and the adaptive brightness and Highlight Mode mean it adapts well to the changing light conditions, although these days this is a standard feature.

This is an entry-level model; still, the performance from the Unisoc T7250 CPU is, for the most part, solid. Google productivity apps run smoothly, with the interfaces for each application responsive, though the screen resolution, while clear, is a little limited.

Likewise, the same is true for some light creative work in apps like Photoshop Express and CapCut: as long as you don’t push the resolution of the images or the video editing, most adjustments and edits are perfectly viable.

As long as your expectations for the tablet are at the entry to mid-level, the performance is solid, although as you push the system, the limitations do start to show under heavier workloads such as serious image editing, video rendering, or gaming. Although it has to be said, all applications tested are usable, especially Lightroom, which actually runs exceptionally well, and this is a tablet designed for outdoor professionals rather than creatives and with that in mind, the performance feels well-balanced.

Battery life is good and impressive through the test. During the benchmarking, which lasted about 3 hours, the battery only dropped 10%. This initial 10% drop utilised the tablet's CPU and GPU to the max, and over the rest of the 10-day test, the tablet dropped to 12% charge, a result that actually supports Ulefone's longevity claims.

Another feature that will be especially relevant to trade is the uSmart expansion connector, dock charging, and eSIM support, all of which set a business-focused feature set that makes the RugKing Pad Pro a great choice for anyone working in the field, and a sure-fire inclusion in our guide to the best rugged tablets we've tested.

Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro: Price & availability

• How much does it cost? $199 / £170
• When is it out? Now
• Where can you get it? Widely available

The Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro is available directly from Ulefone, as well as online retailers including Amazon.com and Amazon.co.uk.

The standard price is $199.99 / £170 at the time of review. Optional accessories, including the desk charging dock, tablet hand strap with kickstand, and uSmart endoscope and microscope modules, are sold separately. The cost of the 4G SIM or eSIM will be an additional expense.

• Value: 4 / 5

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro: Design

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)Specifications

Rugged rating: IP68 / MIL-STD-810H certification
Battery: 7100mAh / 18W fast charging / 6W reverse charging
Screen: 8.68in / 1340 x 800 resolution / 90Hz refresh rate / Corning Gorilla Glass 3
CPU: Unisoc T7250 (12nm), Octa-core (2 x 1.8GHz + 6 x 1.6GHz)
Graphics: ARM Mali-G57 MP1
RAM: 8GB (+ up to 8GB virtual RAM expansion)
Storage: 128GB UFS 2.2; expandable via microSD up to 2TB
Left Ports: USB-C, 3.5mm headphone jack, waterproof port covers
Right Ports: Volume buttons, custom programmable key, SIM tray (2x Nano-SIM + microSD)
Connectivity: 4G LTE dual SIM + built-in eSIM; Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac); Bluetooth 5.2; NFC; GPS + GLONASS + Galileo + BeiDou + QZSS; FM Radio
Audio: Dual speakers; 3.5mm headphone jack; headset-free FM Radio
Camera: 16MP rear (PDAF, HDR, LED flash, 1080p/30fps video); 8MP front
Size: 222 x 131.5 x 12.4mm; 540g
OS Installed: Android 16
Accessories: Desk Charging Dock (sold separately); Tablet Hand Strap with kickstand (sold separately); uSmart E01/E02 endoscope, C01 microscope (sold separately); Buds; Armor Mount Max

The RugKing Pad Pro is a great-looking rugged tablet with its yellow detailing and relatively slim profile. Unlike the more usual blocky, overtly industrial aesthetic that I’ve seen in the past when reviewing rugged tablets, Ulefone has taken a more refined approach: sharp lines, a protective frame, and a bright yellow ribbed back panel that gives it a rugged look without adding unnecessary bulk.

The yellow colour option, applied to the detail elements and the backplate, proved to be a practical choice, as I discovered through the test. That yellow colour makes it easy to spot at the back of a van and in low-light conditions, where high visibility matters. The yellow essentially contrasts well against most working environments and is one of the reasons some camera bag manufacturers also select this colour.

The screen is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 3, which has a slightly matte surface that I found made extended reading and document work more comfortable than a typical glossy display. Although this is an entry-level device with a low screen resolution, the display quality is one of the best I’ve seen, and the surface was absolutely spot on for me.

When it comes to handling, the 8.68-inch size sits well in one hand and is easy to hold, thanks to its 540g weight. While not light, it is still easy to carry for extended periods. One feature of the design highlighted by the manufacturer is the ribbed back, and while this does look grippy, in practice it offers little more traction than a smooth surface; it’s more aesthetic than functional, and a slightly rubberised texture would have improved real-world grip.

The waterproof port plugs are simple push-fit rubber bungs, which are standard for this category. They’re made from a hard rubber that should last the lifespan of the device, but as with all such designs, you need to ensure they’re fully seated before subjecting the device to being submerged in water.

The pogo pin dock connector holds the tablet firmly, and the charging dock, sold separately, is essential if you are looking for this for the workplace, especially if multiple units need to be managed.

• Design: 3 / 5

Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro: Features

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

Fronting the tablet is an 8.68-inch IPS LCD display with a 1340 x 800 resolution, a 90Hz refresh rate, and peak brightness of 860 nits. While the resolution and refresh rate are slightly lower than those of recent rugged tablets, the display still looks good.

A common feature worth highlighting is adaptive brightness, which adjusts the screen automatically to ambient conditions, and there's a dedicated Highlight Mode that pushes brightness even further in direct sunlight. Both features work well in practice, although it is mid-March, so slightly duller day to day than later in the year.

The RugKing Pad Pro supports up to two Nano-SIMs or an eSIM. The physical SIMs, along with the TF/MicroSD card, can be loaded into the slot on the side of the device. It’s worth noting that the eSIM and physical SIMs cannot be used at the same time, and if you do want to switch between them a restart is required.

eSIM activation follows a standard process via Settings > Network & Internet, with setup via QR code or activation code. 4G LTE connectivity is all you get, and there’s no 5G support. Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.2, NFC, and multi-constellation GPS (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou, QZSS) complete the wireless options.

In the past, I’ve been impressed by uSmart's expansion accessories, such as the EndoScope, and it’s great to see that ecosystem from the tough phones now on a larger tablet, as it really does enhance its usefulness. The connector for attaching accessories is on the side and supports Ulefone’s professional accessories, including the E01 and E02 endoscopes and the C01 microscope.

The connector uses a single securing screw for attachment, and the accessories really do provide a genuine professional tool set for trades who need to carry out inspection work. The ability to feed endoscope footage directly to the tablet’s 8.68-inch screen has obvious advantages over a mobile phone screen.

A rugged mobile device wouldn’t be without a programmable custom key, and this can be assigned to any function or app; during testing, it was mapped to the camera for instant access. Other slightly unique features include the Glove mode, activated through the Special Functions menu in Settings, which, when tested, worked well with fabric gloves and lighter work gloves, though heavier-duty gloves didn’t work; however, compared with standard touch screens, this mode does make a big difference to usability.

Another of the big rugged features is the 133LM Super Torch, which sits next to the camera. Here, with the slightly focused beam, it is reasonable and has a decent reach, although there is no brightness adjustment or beam focus control.

The RugKing Pad Pro is preloaded with Android 16 and a host of apps, if anything too many, one of the first things that I would do if owning this phone for business would be to strip the app side back to the essentials. One of those essentials would be the Ulefone’s Service Centre app, which provides support when you need it, along with the user manuals.

• Features: 4 / 5

Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro: Performance

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)Benchmarks

Geekbench CPU Single: 441
Geekbench CPU Multi: 1501
Geekbench GPU: 721
PCMark Overall: N/A
3DMark Slingshot Overall: 1884
3DMark Slingshot Graphics: 1742
3DMark Slingshot Physics: 2633
3DMark Wild Life Overall: 160
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Overall: 67

The Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro is a relatively compact Android-based tablet, and as I started the performance test, a couple of points about the design immediately stood out. The first was that the size made it easy to handle, and even without the hand strap, which would have been handy, it was still easy to hold single-handed.

The textured back, which was supposed to give a little more grip, didn’t seem to do much; however, the build quality is solid, and with the usual rubberised corner protection, it all seemed durable enough.

Powering this small tablet is a Unisoc T7250 CPU, which delivers solid if not cutting-edge performance that’s fine for the market the RugKing Pad Pro is designed for. Checking out all the usual apps, including Google’s productivity apps, Docs, Sheets, Drive, and all loaded quickly and ran without issue.

However, I will say that the 1340 x 800 screen resolution only just provided enough working area for comfortable document editing. When used with those Google apps, the overall feel is well-balanced, the physical size, screen clarity and interface responsiveness work together well, and some of the more unique features were genuinely helpful.

The gloved-hand mode increases the screen's sensitivity, so even with non-touchscreen gloves, the screen still responds. I did find that for thicker gloves, the usual non-response was still present; still, it’s better than most.

Using Lightroom, Photoshop, and CapCut shows that despite the entry-level CPU and GPU, the tablet still has some potential, and the Geekbench results (Single: 441, Multi: 1501, GPU: 721) are far from ground-breaking but show good, solid performance across the board.

Where the tablet does start to struggle is with graphics-intensive tasks, and the 3DMark scores in Slingshot showed an overall score of 1884 and a Wild Life score of 160, all confirming that the Mali-G57 MP1 GPU is a competent mid-weight GPU. Flipping back to the real-world tests, sure enough, Photoshop Express, Lightroom mobile, and CapCut video editing were possible, and even NFS Asphalt ran surprisingly well.

GPS performance was generally reliable, though there was significant cloud cover during much of the test period, which made satellite connectivity a little sporadic. On clear days, the RugKing Pad Pro locked on quickly and matched the positioning accuracy of comparable rugged smartphones. 4G connectivity and speed, while not close to what I’m used to with 5G, performed well, and the signal strength in Salisbury, England, was excellent, though, heading to the outskirt towns around the New Forest, where we’re limited to 4G.

Over a 10-day period, the RugKing Pad Pro joined me for work and under normal mixed usage, mainly checking and answering emails, alongside the benchmarking test and using a variety of applications, browsing, Google Docs, and some media playback, the device finished with 12% battery.

One point of note is that the screen powers off by default after 30 seconds, which is incredibly short, so I extended the switch-off time, which has a dramatic effect on battery life.

As a final note, while the tablet does have a camera, the 16MP rear camera resolution and quality is best described as adequate, perfect for taking pictures for site documentation, reference shots, scanning, but it’s worth knowing that the brighter it is, the cleaner the images you capture will be, and this is relevant for both images and stills.

• Performance: 4 / 5

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro: Final verdict

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

The Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro is at the budget end of rugged tablets, yet, despite the price, it's a great option if you’re looking for a well-thought-out tablet that delivers decent performance for productivity apps and can withstand most environmental conditions.

The build quality and design are genuinely impressive for the price, and as long as the rubber lugs are pushed in securely, it will be water-tight as well as shockproof, making it ideal for trades. One aspect that sometimes lets these rugged smartphones down is the screen, and once again, the resolution is low; however, the brightness is good, and it's easy to see outdoors, even in bright conditions. The battery life over a 10-day test was also superb.

When it came to the more advanced performance, the Unisoc T7250, while a capable mid-range processor that handles productivity tasks well does start to hit its limitations under heavier creative workloads, however, that’s not really what this device is for and if you just want to enhance a few image or make short site videos then the camera and processing power will more than suffice.

I am a little surprised that a new release is still limited to 4G rather than 5G, but this will be due to price considerations, although it will limit the product's actual lifespan as 5G becomes more widely available. At present, I’m lucky to see E for my network connectivity. Despite it only offering 4G support, you can add an eSIM, which is incredibly easy to do, and the system seems well set up to do this; although you can’t run a standard SIM at the same time as the eSIM, it’s one or the other.

Some of the additional features are unique to this product line, such as the uSmart accessory ecosystem, which, as with previous releases, works incredibly well and, for trades, will be a great asset. Then, with the dock charging compatibility, it further lends itself to use in the workplace.

Should I buy a Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro?

Value

Great value for money for a solid workplace tablet that can withstand the elements

4

Design

The rugged design is slimmer and lighter than many other tablets of this style, making it far more portable

4

Features

A decent set of features, a bright screen, and the ability to connect USmart accessories

4

Performance

While rugged, the CPU and GPU limit the performance

3

Overall

Considering the entry-level price, the tablet has a good range of features and solid all-around performance

4

Buy it if...

You need a tough tablet.

If you need a tablet for work that’s tough, able to withstand the elements, and able to withstand being knocked about, then this is a great option. 

Small and rugged

Unlike other rugged tablets, this can easily be held in one hand while still offering a decent 8.68-inch screen. 

Don't buy it if...

You need fast networking.

While there is an eSIM available, the cellular network connection is limited to 4G only.

You use creative apps.

While Lightroom runs smoothly on the system and short edits are possible in CapCut as soon as you start pushing the adjustments, the device starts to show its limitations. 

For more durable devices, we've tested and reviewed the best rugged laptops and best rugged phones

RayNeo Air 4 Pro: 30-second reviewSpecs

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

Display: 0.6-inch Tandem Micro-OLED per eye; 201-inch equivalent at 6 metres
Resolution: 1920 x 1080 per eye (2D); 3840 x 1080 combined (3D)
Brightness: 1,200 nits peak
Contrast: 200,000:1
Colour space: 98% DCI-P3; 145% sRGB
Colour accuracy: Delta E < 2
Refresh rate: 60Hz / 120Hz
HDR: HDR10 with HueView 2.0
Processor: Vision 4000
Audio: 4-speaker system, tuned by Bang & Olufsen; Whisper Mode and Surround Mode
Eye protection: TUV SUD Low Blue Light and Flicker-Free certified
Colour modes: Standard, Movie, Eye Protection
Connectivity: USB-C DisplayPort; compatible with iPhone 15/16, MacBook, iPad, Android, consoles
Prescription support: Magnetic lens frame; compatible with Lensology custom lenses
Weight: 76g
Dimensions: 176.5 x 154.3 x 47.4mm
Batman Justice Edition extras: Clip-on Batman Bat Shade; standard lens shade; collector's vault packaging
Optional accessory: RayNeo Pocket TV (sold separately)

The RayNeo Air 4 Pro Batman Justice Edition are the latest iteration of the company's display glasses and quite a leap forward compared with the RayNeo Air 3S Pro’s that I looked at, at the beginning of the year.

This new iteration runs alongside the standard RayNeo Air 4 Pro but adds a little Batman branding to the package. The glasses arrive in a large collector's vault that will instantly appeal to any DC fan. The presentation of the special edition box is rather restrained rather than garish, with a large bat symbol on an otherwise all-black box. Inside are the glasses inside the usual protective case, just with the addition of the Batman symbol.

Like the box, the glasses themselves are equally discreet: there’s just a small Batman logo on the right arm alongside the Bang & Olufsen branding, otherwise in every other way they look almost identical to the standard Air 4 Pro. The real differentiator is tucked beneath a cardboard divider, which, once lifted away, reveals the clip-on Batman mask. This is a masquerade-style shade that snaps neatly onto the front of the glasses frame, helping to block out light and amusing anyone who may be watching you.

The mask itself is actually well designed and clips and unclips easily; it’s also incredibly light, so it adds little or no perceivable weight to your nose, and does something genuinely useful beyond the obvious fun. The glasses' lenses are slightly opaque, so that you can see a little of what is going on around you. Once the shade is in place, this essentially blocks ambient light far more effectively than the standard shade, making a more immersive experience in brighter environments. Sat still watching The Dark Knight through a MacBook Pro; the effect with the mask in place is impressive once your mind gets used to the little big screen effect.

Through the test, I ran the glasses on a MacBook Pro M1 Max, an iPhone 15 Pro, an iPad mini and the RayNeo Pocket TV device, and the setup was consistently straightforward. The glasses power on automatically when the USB-C cable connects, and the display mirrors immediately with no configuration required. The cable that connects the glasses to a host device runs from the back of the right arm, over your shoulder, to the device, and it becomes easy to ignore.

One of the headline features over previous models is HDR10. In practice, watching HDR content via Netflix and Apple TV on the MacBook, the improvement in shadow detail and mid-tone contrast is real, although subtle. The Vision 4000 chip's AI SDR-to-HDR upscaling adds to the visual crispness of most content. Neither transformation is dramatic. Together, however, they do boost the visual quality over earlier RayNeo glasses.

The Bang & Olufsen audio is a clear improvement, and through the test, I found that the standard mode delivered the best balanced, clear sound, and a decent volume that was definitely better than previous AR glasses. Whisper Mode is once again inaudible to anyone nearby, especially in crowded environments, making this a great solution for commuting, although probably not with the mask in place. Surround Mode is the only disappointment. The spatial effect is noticeable, but the volume drop makes it difficult to use unless you're in a quiet room.

One of the other features I was keen to try is the 2D-to-3D AI conversion. For personal video files shot on your phone, it is genuinely impressive, creating convincing depth that surprised me on the first render to show my dog walking in pretty effectively in 3D. For feature films and streaming content, things are a little more complicated. The AI processing doesn’t work on streamed content at all, and even with locally stored files, the processing seemed to hang on content that was too long. The RayNeo Pocket TV accessory, tested separately, enables standalone streaming via Google TV but similarly does not extend 3D processing to that content.

The RayNeo Air 4 Pros are a great set of display glasses which pack down to the size of a glasses case, enabling you to take them anywhere. If you’re travelling, then it’s a great way to take a decent large-format screen with you. The Batman Justice Edition shade is a bit of fun, so if you're a Batman fan, then these will be a great choice. For all others, the standard edition is, aside from the mask, identical.

RayNeo Air 4 Pro: Price & availability

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

The RayNeo Air 4 Pro is available directly from uk.rayneo.com. The standard edition is priced at $249 / £249 direct from the RayNeo website. On Amazon.com, they're priced at $299 and £379 at Amazon.co.uk.

The Batman Justice Edition carries a small additional premium - and at the time of review, I'm only seeing it available on the RayNeo website in the US.

The optional RayNeo Pocket TV, which enables standalone Google TV streaming without a connected device, is sold separately.

• Score: 4/5

RayNeo Air 4 Pro: Design & build

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

The Air 4 Pro are instantly recognisable as a pair of display glasses with that slightly bulkier design compared with a standard pair of glasses. However, the size and bulk are slowly reducing, and these are noticeably slimmer than earlier generations and rivals I've tested.

The build quality of the frame is all well-constructed and has a premium feel despite the relatively low price. Some of the notable signs that these are not standard sunglasses include the thicker-than-standard arms that have space to fit the electronics, speakers, and control buttons. This means that while these are getting slimmer, they are still very noticeable as something different.

One of the main concerns with any set of display glasses is weight and, therefore, how comfortable they will be when worn for extended viewing sessions. At just 76g, the glasses are genuinely lightweight, and wearing them through a full viewing of The Dark Knight produced only the temporary nose pressure you'd expect from any glasses worn continuously.

The nose pad does offer some adjustment if limited by the ability to move the pads in and out to change the screen distance from your eyes, which is a useful calibration tool. The one consistent note from testing, as with the Air 3s Pro, is that to get the screen in the right position required pushing the glasses slightly down the nose from the natural wearing position. I

The glasses are not self-contained and require a host device to stream content, in the same way as a monitor. Here, a USB-C cable exits from the back of the right arm and trails down to your connected device, be that a laptop, mobile phone or Pocket TV. The positioning of the cable is well thought through, essentially over the shoulder rather than dropping straight down, and after an initial positioning, you genuinely forget about it.

There is something more to this edition of the glasses over the standard with the Batman shade that clips to the front of the frame. Once installed, the slightly opaque lenses are screened off to black, and the size of the mask helps to block out more ambient light than the standard shade. While the shade works and is light, it still adds some weight to the unit, and is probably best left at home when using these on your daily commute.

• Design & build: 4/5

RayNeo Air 4 Pro: Features

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

The Air 4 Pro features two 0.6-inch Micro-OLED screens, one 1080p per eye with a max brightness of 1,200 nits, 200,000:1 contrast and 98% DCI-P3 colour. This is essentially the same as the Air 3S Pro that I looked at a couple of months ago.

What this latest release adds is an all-new Vision 400 processor that brings, amongst other enhancements, HDR10 support, better colour mapping and contrast. The other big feature here is the Audio by Bang and Olufsen.

The Vision 4000 chip's enhancements reach right across the feature set, especially with the new AI processing that works in the background to boost the quality of the visuals. AI SDR-to-HDR upscaling is applied in real-time, so it’s one of those features that makes a big difference, but you don’t actually notice it, as it’s so integrated with the workings of the glasses.

The AI 2D-to-3D conversion is another major feature that requires the companion app to use. This is good, but it does seem to be in its early development. For personal video files shot on an iPhone and stored locally, the processing is genuinely impressive, with the depth separation being convincing, and the effect adds genuine visual interest to the footage.

One discrepancy on the site's description of the glasses that is worth noting is that six colour modes are listed: Standard, Game, Movie, Eye Protection, Professional, and Vision Boost, but the review unit had only three: Standard, Movie, and Eye Protection. Game, Professional, and Vision Boost modes were not present in the firmware version tested, but may well be added later. Standard and Eye Protection proved the most useful for general viewing; Movie mode warmed the image far too much for my liking.

The Bang & Olufsen audio partnership is genuinely a great addition with the four-speaker system. Standard mode supplies clear, balanced sound with good depth and enough volume for most environments. Whisper Mode is once again impressive, and sitting in a café, the people I was with were unable to hear any noise from the glasses until they put their heads up close.

One of the audio features that I was looking forward to trying was the Surround Mode, which introduces spatial quality to the audio.

Through the test, I tried the glasses with several devices and for all, the Plug-and-play compatibility was good with the iPhone 15 Pro, MacBook Pro M1 Max, and iPad mini, simply plugging in and being recognised without issue.

Navigation of the on-screen display is handled via a double-click of the left arm menu button to enter settings, volume buttons to scroll, and a single click to select. Switching between 2D and 3D requires a triple press of the volume rocker, followed by the RayNeo XR app to manage content. The control system works, but it takes a while for it to become intuitive.

• Features: 4.5/5

RayNeo Air 4 Pro: Performance

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

The simplest way to get started with the Air 4 Pros is to simply plug them directly into the USB-C port at the bottom of your phone, laptop or other device that enables display out. Once the glasses are plugged in, they instantly become a virtual 201-inch screen or at least the illusion of one.

Initially, it does just look like two small screens in front of your eyes, but due to the close proximity and resolution, your brain quickly enables the illusion of the scale of the screen to settle in. Once that brain adjustment happens, the effect of the screens is impressive and makes an ideal option for watching back media.

One hope for these display glasses was that I would be able to use them as a wearable screen for the computer; however, at 1080p, the screen resolution is limited. There’s also the fact that you need to keep your head still as the lenses are fixed to the glasses, so every head movement sees the screens move, which is initially a little disorientating. Unlike VR glasses, there’s no image stabilisation, so the more stationary your head, the better the effect.

The way that these glasses work is that what you’re looking at is actually a projection of the screens, rather than directly at the screens themselves. This means that the lens part of the glasses, while dark like sunglasses, is opaque so that you can see what’s going on around you. However, the density of the shades is high, so while in bright conditions you can see in front of you, in shaded rooms they may as well be blacked out, and all you really see are shadows crossing the display.

As with previous editions, there is a plastic shade that clips to the front, helping to block the light and boost the screen visuals. However, these being the Batman edition, as well as the standard shade, there's also the Batman option. This mask is larger than the standard version and helps to illuminate even more light. The effect is good and really does have a dramatic effect on just how immersive the experience is.

The visuals are good, but then so were the visuals of the Air 3S Pro, which share a similar resolution and specification screens. However, with the new Vision 4000 processor, the visual quality gets a boost with HDR10 content, which displays brighter and with greater dynamic range.

In practice, HDR10 content viewed via Netflix and Apple TV on the MacBook Pro showed better shadow and highlight detail than the standard display, and the videos were slightly stronger in contrast and brightness. While there is an improvement, it is subtle, so if you’re expecting a huge difference, then you’ll be disappointed.

HDR content on the MacBook Pro via Netflix and Apple TV is a great place to check the full effect, although again limited by the 1080p resolution, which is apparent. The Dark Knight was used to test the visuals, primarily due to it being a Batman film, but it was also partly shot on IMAX film with extremely deliberate lighting. The effect was notable, but you would only notice it if you were looking for it.

Flicking through the glasses options, there’s a good amount of choice, and those looking to use this with a gaming console will be pleased to see the 120Hz refresh rate option. At 60Hz, action sequences showed a small amount of motion judder, although this is slightly masked by the 1080p resolution. Switching to 120Hz did enable smoother motion, and for gaming, you’d probably want to switch to this option; for standard TV and film, 60Hz will more than suffice.

One of the notable features of these glasses is the 1,200 nit peak brightness, and when these are coupled with the dark opaque lenses, you can view the screens in almost any lighting conditions. There is the usual shade in the box, but then, this being the Batman edition, there’s also the Batman mask that can be clipped to the front. This is probably not something that you would want to wear in and around the office or in public, but in the comfort of your own home, it is a bit of fun.

While the main aim of the Batman shade is to support the partnership with the Batman brand, the larger size of the shade compared with the standard version does help to block out a little more light and further adds to the immersive experience. Other than the visuals of the Batman mask, there really is little other benefit, and unless you’re a Batman fan, then it’s probably best to opt for the slightly cheaper standard version.

One of the other features that had stood out was the 3D potential, especially with these being Batman-branded. To access the 3D features, you can either use the App to view your own content or stereoscopic content by double-clicking the left and right rocker levers on the arms. I was hoping that with the Dark Knight having been shot for IMAX, or at least some of the scenes, would somehow be 3D optimised through the AI feature. Testing this feature with the glasses connected to the App and video content from my phone viewed through the app, the effect is impressive; oddly, still images once processed are less impressive. Having tested some smaller files, I decided to see if this near-realtime 3D enhancement of video was also possible for feature films and streaming content.

Unfortunately, I quickly established that this may be pushing the 3D AI conversion a little too far, and streamed content cannot be processed regardless of the source, and even the RayNeo Pocket TV accessory, which brings standalone Google TV streaming to the glasses, doesn’t add any 3D processing.

Looking at the colour options, and again there’s a good choice, and the effects are quite stark, and through this test I actually found the standard mode was the best for film, TV and other content. Switching to the movie option turned everything a little too yellow.

Another of the big features for these glasses is the audio partnership with Bang & Olufsen, and this is genuinely a good boost to the audio quality. Watching several episodes of Monarch and The Dark Knight through the MacBook Pro, the sound quality through Standard mode was impressive, comfortably better than laptop speakers and on a par with a decent set of over-ear headphones. Whisper Mode's ability, which impressed me in the past, once again manages to contain audio within the immediate vicinity. However, the surround sound option that I was looking forward to testing just seemed to run too quietly, and the only place that I could take full advantage was in a quiet room, and even then, the volume just felt a touch too quiet.

In the final part of the test, I tried using the glasses as a secondary display for the MacBook, and I found that for reviewing product manuals and reference material, it was workable. While for reading, the resolution is ok, and the larger area was good, again, you do need to keep your head still. Throughout the review, while these screens are good and the price well balanced, you still can’t escape that the screens are quite small compared with the latest VR headsets, and the fact that there’s no horizon steady or stabilisation will take a bit of getting used to.

Alongside the Air 4 Pros, I also took a look at the RayNeo Pocket TV accessory, tested as part of this review, and this worked incredibly well once set up as a standalone streaming device connected to the glasses via USB-C, and enables you to connect without a phone or laptop, as long as there’s a wifi connection.

• Performance: 4.5/5

RayNeo Air 4 Pro Batman Justice Edition: Final verdict

The RayNeo Air 4 Pro Batman Justice Edition display glasses are great fun if you’re a Batman fan and want something else for the collection. For everyone else, there’s the standard option of the Air 4 Pros, which are slightly cheaper.

If you strip away the fact that the shade is a Batman mask and you’re unlikely to wear it out in public, the effect when clipped to the front of the glasses, with the more extensive coverage over the shades, actually does block more light, so in a way, the mask is practical.

When it comes to the list of enhancements from the Air 3S Pro I looked at earlier in the year, while the screen resolutions remain much the same, the HDR10 display, Bang & Olufsen audio, and a 120Hz refresh rate do make these glasses and far better for media playback when you’re on the move.

The 3D conversion feature again offers great potential, and it works well on personal video footage, but at present, it cannot process streaming content, and even on compatible files, the effect varies depending on the content, but is genuinely impressive.

For DC fans, the Justice Edition is great fun. For everyone else, the standard Air 4 Pro offers identical performance, and at a slightly lower price.

Value

Standard Air 4 Pro at £249 are cheap for this display quality. The Batman Justice Edition Premium is great fun for dedicated fans

4

Design

Slim, well-built, and comfortable for extended viewing sessions. Batman shade looks great and works practically if you’re a fan.

4

Features

HDR10, B&O audio, 120Hz and AI processing are all decent upgrades. The 3D is limited to personal video files, but again shows potential. 

4

Performance

HDR enhancement is visible, and the audio is excellent, although the surround sound option is a little low in volume.

4

Total

The Batman edition is great fun for fans and considering the price the standard edition is good value if you want a set of display glasses 

4.5

Should you buy the RayNeo Air 4 Pro?

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)Buy it if...

You want a personal cinema for travel 
lightweight, immersive, and genuinely good-looking, these are the best display glasses for media consumption available right now.

You're a DC fan
The Justice Edition packaging, Batman shade and collector's vault make this one of the more enjoyable unboxing experiences in tech, and the mask genuinely improves immersion.

Don't buy it if...

You're buying primarily for the 3D feature.
AI 3D works impressively on your own video files, but does not extend to streaming content or feature films, which is where most viewers will want it.

You want true augmented reality.
These are display glasses that simulate a large screen, not smart glasses with AR overlays or standalone computing. A connected device is always required.

For more picks, we've reviewed the best smart glasses.

TP-Link Omada EAP787: 30-second review

Ceiling-mounted access points have been extremely popular since makers like TP-Link began designing them with PoE in mind.

Positioning the TP-Link Omada EAP787 in a range of these devices, it's either at the top or just below it, since the makers do have the EAP783, which is BE20000 rated.

Depending on the region this equipment is deployed, the EAP787 is either a BE12000 or BE15000 capable device with up to channels covering 2.4GHz, 5GHz and 6GHz frequencies. In the USA(BE15000), these bands offer 5765 Mbps on 6 GHz, 8648 Mbps on 5 GHz and 688 Mbps on 2.4 GHz, totalling 15101 Mbps.

In the EU and UK (BE12000), those numbers are 5765 Mbps on 6 GHz, 5765 Mbps on 5 GHz and 688 Mbps on 2.4 GHz, totalling 12218 Mbps. The hardware is identical; it’s just that in the USA, the FCC permits 320 MHz-wide channels on the 5 GHz band, whereas under European regulators (ETSI/Ofcom), the limit is 5 GHz to just 160 MHz wide.

The caveat to having this much bandwidth available is that the EAP787 must use a 10GbE backhaul to connect to the larger network, and potentially the Internet. And that requires a special switch that supports PoE++ 10GbE.

As with most TP-Links Omada hardware, the EAP787 is packed with Enterprise-class technologies that allow it to be remotely configured and controlled, and this AP also has a frequency monitoring technology that detects interference in real-time and enables the hardware to reconfigure automatically.

The only significant missing feature is APC on 6GHz, something that TP-Link has promised is coming soon via a firmware update.

Given its capabilities, the EAP787 seems implausibly cheap, but it's worth noting that buying these might require larger investments in network infrastructure to make the most of what they can do.

If you have a 10GbE PoE++ switch, then this is probably one of the best access points available. And when TP-Link releases the AFC firmware, it will get even better.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)TP-Link Omada EAP787: price and availability

• How much does it cost? $250/£230/€280
• When is it out? Available now
• Where can you get it? Available from Amazon and other online retailers.

As with most TP-Link hardware, the EAP787 is available from major online resellers, including Amazon. In the USA, it costs $249.99 and in the UK it's £ 250.

However, I wouldn’t recommend buying it on Amazon unless you only need a single unit. Many resellers who specialize in network equipment offer excellent deals on bulk purchases and bundles that include a 12V power supply or a PoE injector.

The competition comes primarily from another TP-Link design, the EAP 873, as well as the Ubiquiti Unifi U7 Pro XGS and U7 Pro Max.

The EAP873 is effectively two EAP787s glued together, offering a massive BE22000 spec, but it lacks the dedicated TF scanning, AFC or Bluetooth. It also requires dual 10GbE LAN ports to provide sufficient uplink. The cost of this item is $499.99 on Amazon, which seems appropriate for the bandwidth on offer.

The Ubiquiti U7 Pro XGS costs $299.99 from Amazon, and that’s a BE15000 specification AP (in the USA), and also uses a single 10GbE PoE++ port for power and data.

The Ubiquiti U7-Pro-Max is very similar from a Wi-Fi perspective, having the same BE15000 capability, but bizarrely, the makers have given this model only a single 2.5GbE PoE+ Uplink. It’s only a little cheaper than the Ubiquiti U7 Pro XGS, so I’d avoid that option.

Based on the specifications and cost, the EAP787 seems something of a bargain, but it’s worth considering the extra infrastructure needed to make the best use of this hardware before making an impulse purchase.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

• Value score: 4/5

TP-Link Omada EAP787: Specs

Feature

Specification

Model

EAP787 v1 (BE15000 US / BE12000 EU)

Wi-Fi Standard

IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (Wi-Fi 7)

Wi-Fi Bands

Tri-Band: 688 Mbps (2.4GHz) + 8648 Mbps (5GHz) + 5765 Mbps (6GHz)

Total Throughput

Up to 15,101 Mbps (US) / 12,195 Mbps (EU)

Streams

8 spatial streams (4x4 on 5GHz, 2x2 on 6GHz, 2x2 on 2.4GHz)

Modulation

4096-QAM (Wi-Fi 7), 1024-QAM, 256-QAM

Channel Width

Up to 320MHz (6GHz), 160/240MHz (5GHz)

Uplink Port

1x 10G/2.5G Ethernet (2.5G with PoE+, 10G with PoE++)

PoE Standard

802.3bt (PoE++) (51.7W max; also supports DC power)

Dedicated RF Scanning

2x2 radio; requires Omada controller v6.0+

AFC Support

Yes, via firmware update (planned April 2026)

MLO Support

Multi-Link Operation across 5GHz + 6GHz

Concurrent Clients

510+ (lab tested)

Coverage Area

Up to 2,050 ft² / 190 m²

Bluetooth

BLE 5.2

Management

Omada SDN (controller required for advanced features); standalone web UI

Mesh Support

Yes (Omada Mesh)

Seamless Roaming

Yes

TP-Link Omada EAP787: design

• Large dish design
• Ceiling and wall mounting
• 10GbE PoE++ implications

The EAP787 follows TP-Link's standard Omada ceiling-mount aesthetic of a large circular disc designed for flush ceiling or suspended tile installation. The push-and-rotate mount mechanism makes installation straightforward for IT teams.

Using it with 51.7W PoE++, that’s a significant power draw, and the unit is notably large, which may create challenges in space-constrained or aesthetics-sensitive environments.

It comes with a circular mounting plate with holes for four possible connection options. These include a basic ceiling/wall mount, a 3.5-inch US round junction box, a US gang outlet, and an EU gang outlet.

In a recess on the underside of the EAP787 is the 10GbE PoE++ port, and a 12V input if you wish to power it directly rather than use PoE. A plastic cover is provided for this area, but I’d only use it if you have Ethernet cables terminated with a 90-degree connector, since with it attached, there is no straight path to the port.

Four internal antennas handle the eight Wi-Fi streams, while a separate pair of internal antennas is used for the dedicated RF scanning radio. BLE 5.2 is also built in, enabling future IoT integration and remote out-of-band management possibilities via the Omada app.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

There is a single 10G/2.5G combo Ethernet port, with the operating speed determined solely by the PoE class provided by the upstream switch. As an alternative, there is a 12V power input, but the PSU for this isn’t included in the box. And TP-Link also makes PoE++ injectors if you want to avoid a PoE++ switch but already have 10GbE networking.

Being generous, this is an elegant design that lets buyers enter at PoE+ and upgrade later. But it’s also worth noting that to get the most from this design requires a 10GbE PoE++ switch, and something like the TP-Link TL-SX3206HPP with four ports of 10GbE PoE++ is likely to cost you £500, substantially more than the EAP787.

For a larger deployment, the 24-port TP-Link SX3832MPP is likely to cost you £1,619.95, though this does have eight 10GbE SFP+ ports to handle the network backbone.

The relatively low price of this Access Point is a lure to get on board the Omada train, as to get all the best features and easiest control requires at least an Omada controller and probably an Omada switch.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

Design score: 4/5

TP-Link Omada EAP787: In use

• Omada control
• AFC is not yet ready

For those unfamiliar with the Omada ecosystem, all TP-Link’s Omada-branded equipment follows the same pattern: it can be used in standalone web-interface mode or via an Omada controller. The controller can be either a hardware controller at additional cost, or a software one configured on a system that remains operationally 24/7.

For an IT professional with lots of TP-Link gear managed by Omada controllers, it makes for an easy life, as the system can be managed globally, including over different sites through a single web-based interface.

Luckily for this review, I already have an Omada controller and a number of Omada access points, so adding this one to the gang is merely a matter of plugging it in and then going to the Omada controller app to adopt it. Once joined to the system, the controller will monitor the EAP787, and automatically deploy the pre-defined SSIDs associated with the network.

That saves me some time, but if I were deploying a dozen of these or other Omada hardware across multiple locations, it could save a substantial amount of effort. It’s also incredibly useful for making sweeping changes and collecting data that might justify buying more (or less) equipment to better meet the demands placed on the network.

Some will argue that TP-Link are attempting to lock you into their hardware, and to a degree, that’s an accurate analysis, but most networking hardware makers do much the same thing, and hardware uniformity makes for greater predictability.

Like all the TP-Link Omada equipment I’ve recently tested, the EAP787 was immediately recognised by the Omada controller and began working alongside the others within minutes.

One special feature I’ve not seen previously, but on the EAP787 is dedicated RF scanning. This is an independent monitoring of the usable spectrum for interference without disrupting client traffic. To leverage this continuous adaptation, the Omada controller v6.0 or higher is required, but it is arguably the device's most compelling enterprise capability.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

If there is a blot on this wonderfully cultured Omada landscape, it’s AFC on the EAP787.

AFC, or Automated Frequency Coordination, allows the 6GHz radio to transmit at higher power levels, substantially improving range. That’s important because 5765 Mbps of the available bandwidth is allocated to 6GHz, and if it’s only of use to those standing under the Access Point, then the BE12000 (or BE15000) rating is a little disingenuous.

At the time of writing this review, AFC doesn’t work on the EAP787, although it’s promised in a firmware update coming, allegedly, in April 2026. Until it ships, the 6GHz range will be constrained by standard power limits, as is the case with most current Wi-Fi 7 APs.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

• In Use: 4/5

TP-Link Omada EAP787: performance

• AFC will improve 6GHz, eventually
• EU performance reduction on 5GHz

Performance testing on this hardware is slightly coloured at this point, partly because, depending on what region you are in, there is a different bandwidth topology, and also because AFC isn’t yet ready for public consumption.

The EAP787 uses the same Qualcomm chipset family as its EAP783 brother, though its 5GHz radio is specified at an even higher rate of 8648 Mbps vs the EAP783's 5760 Mbps, suggesting the 5GHz radio has been significantly upgraded.

However, no single client can access that much bandwidth, and in Europe, the 5GHz band is limited to 5760 Mbps anyway.

What’s true wherever the EAP787 is deployed is that the 10GbE port can sustain over 9 Gbps, assuming the wirelessly connected clients are pulling or pushing that much data. As this AP can support more than 500 users simultaneously, that should be possible.

MLO performance, like other 2024-era Wi-Fi 7 APs, will fluctuate until AFC is live. As 6GHz range limitations constrain MLO effectiveness, as noted across the Omada lineup. The EAP787 could be the hardware to fix that issue when TP-Link finally releases the firmware necessary to activate AFC.

It’s worth noting that AFC isn’t yet available on Ubiquiti's alternative devices, so if that feature works as intended when it becomes available, it’s a significant advantage for the EAP787.

While it’s difficult to put hard numbers on its effectiveness, the dedicated RF scanning radio operates independently from the three data radios, meaning real-time interference monitoring does not tax Wi-Fi throughput. This is a notable advantage in high-density or congested RF environments such as convention centres, hospitals, and lecture halls.

In my testing with a suitably Wi-Fi 7 capable laptop, connection speeds of 1.2 Gbps are standard when near the AP, and even at range, 720 Mbps was sustained. The only caveat to that level of performance is that the first ten people will wonder what happened to their amazing connection when more people turn up.

• Performance score: 4/5

(Image credit: TP-Link)TP-Link Omada EAP787: Final verdict

When the wireless network is expanded with devices like the EAP787, then it's likely that other parts will need upgrading to make use of what it delivers. As I mentioned earlier, making the best use of this gear requires infrastructure changes, but new switches and Omada controllers might just be the tip of a considerable iceberg.

Because the majority of Wi-Fi access won’t be for internal systems, but the greater internet, and having a wireless network with access points that can shift up to 15000Mbps, won’t work if you only have 1GbE broadband at the end of that 10GbE infrastructure.

If you choose to embrace the EAP787 or its EAP783 bigger brother, or any of the UniFi U7 Pro equipment, then budget for a wider broadband pipe at the same time.

This hardware is designed for large enterprises and high-density venues, such as convention centres, lecture halls, or hospitals, with 100+ simultaneous clients per AP, where dedicated RF scanning and high client capacity matter.

It fits better with 10GbE infrastructure, since connecting it by 2.5GbE effectively negates the point of this AP, leaving you paying a premium for 2.5G performance available more cheaply elsewhere.

The Omada ecosystems, with their seamless controller integration, no licensing fees, and consistent Omada management, make it a natural upgrade path from earlier EAP models.

I would avoid using the EAP787 in small offices or homes, where a simpler EAP773 or EAP783 suffices. Those environments without 10GbE switching, or where anyone who needs an AP can deploy standalone without a controller and access all features.

This is plenty of AP for a modest price, but making the most of it requires TP-Link to finish its work with AFC, and those who choose this equipment must accept that it could easily lead to significant additional investment.

Should I buy a TP-Link Omada EAP787?TP-Link EAP787 Score Card

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Value

Aggressively priced for the specification of this device

4/5

Design

A simple dish with all the clever stuff inside

4/5

In Use

Works with Omada management, and AFC is promised

4/5

Performance

EU performance is restricted, but US bandwidth is epic

4/5

Overall

Better in the US than the EU, but be mindful of the switch you need with this

4.5/5

Buy it if...

You want Wi-Fi 7
While there is better Wi-Fi 7 hardware available, most of it costs much more than this. However, you may find that those clients who are using Wi-Fi 5 or 6 equipment get less of an uplift than expected.

You want central management
TP-Link has created a highly organised management system for its Omada-branded equipment, and that includes this access point. For a small IT covering a large facility, the ability to monitor and adjust hardware remotely is a huge cost-saving.

Don't buy it if...

You don’t have Wi-Fi 7 clients
Without the right hardware on the client end, there is little point in going with a Wi-Fi 7 access point. And, you might be able to get more bandwidth on 2.4GHz and 5GHz, by spending the same money on a Wi-Fi 6 or 6e access point.

You don’t use 10GbE
To make the best use of this equipment, it requires 10GbE and PoE++. Without those things, there is little point in deploying the EAP787.

For more connectivity solutions, we've reviewed the best business routers

Jabra Evolve3 85: 30-second review

Professional headsets have always had an image problem. The moment you clip a boom arm to your ear, you look like someone who works in a call centre or is directing air traffic. Jabra has clearly decided that aesthetic just isn’t good enough.

With the Evolve3 85, the company has taken all the voice clarity technology it has spent years developing, stripped away the boom mic entirely, and wrapped everything in a design that would not look out of place in a Copenhagen coffee shop.

The headline technology is Jabra ClearVoice, a boomless microphone system powered by a deep neural network trained on over 60 million sentences. It uses multiple concealed microphones to separate speech from background noise without a visible arm, drawing on expertise from GN's hearing division.

Design-wise, the Evolve3 85 is up to 35 per cent slimmer than its Evolve2 predecessor, claims to be the lightest over-ear headset in its class, and folds into a travel case thin enough to mistake for empty. The over-ear fit gives better passive isolation than the on-ear Evolve3 75 sibling, making it ideal for both open offices and noisy commutes.

Looks aren’t everything, but the Evolve 3 85 can also claim battery life figures that are genuinely remarkable. Jabra quotes 25 hours of call time and 120 hours of music playback on a single charge, with a five-minute fast charge providing five hours of use. That effectively means that by the point your line manager has berated your timekeeping, the headphones are ready to get you through at least half the working day from flat.

And, wireless charging is also supported, via the flat exterior surface of the earcups, avoiding excessive wear on the USB-C port

The adaptive ANC deserves particular attention. Unlike most headsets, which pause noise cancellation the moment you start a call, the Evolve3 85 keeps it active throughout. Combined with the Bluetooth 5.4 connection, LC3 codec support, and dual-device pairing, the package's connectivity looks impressively comprehensive.

If all this sounds way too good to be realistic, the Evolve3 85 sits firmly at the premium end of the market at around $500. Compared with the outgoing Evolve2 85 and similar UC-certified alternatives, that’s price continuity.

The Evolve3 85 makes a compelling case on every front except price, but even at this cost, these deserve to be added to our best noise-cancelling headphone collection.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)Jabra Evolve3 85: price and availability

• How much does it cost? From $527/£496/€569
• When is it out? Pre-order for April 2026
• Where can you get it? Direct from Jabra and online retailers

The Jabra Evolve3 85 launched on 1 March 2026 at a recommended price of $649 in the United States, £495 in the UK, €569 in Europe (including VAT), and AU$979 in Australia.

Initially only available in black, a Warm Grey colour variant is due to follow in April 2026 in select markets. The Evolve3 75, the on-ear sibling, is available from the same date at the lower price of £349 / $463.

Checking the larger online retailers, the Evolve3 85 Microsoft Teams model is available for pre-order at only $475 on Amazon.com, for a model with only wired charging, and $527 for one with wireless charging.

Oddly, the wired All Platforms model is the same price as the Microsoft Teams model, but the wireless option is a disturbing $720. I suspect that the final price is a mistake, since in other regions the prices for the two standards are the same.

In the UK, this headset is on Amazon.co.uk, but can be bought directly from the official Jabra website. The Microsoft Teams wired charging model is £429, and the wireless model is £466.80; all prices include VAT, and the same pricing applies to the Unified Communication models.

These are enterprise-grade prices, and Jabra makes no apologies for that. The Evolve2 85, which the Evolve3 replaces, was similarly positioned, and buyers of business equipment will likely have IT budgets rather than personal wallets in mind. That said, Jabra has clearly made a conscious effort to position the Evolve3 as a crossover product, and at this price, it will face meaningful competition from premium consumer headphones that carry genuinely impressive audio credentials.

For organisations deploying at scale, Jabra offers free trials for companies of 500 or more employees who are replacing existing devices, and the Plus Management platform simplifies fleet deployment considerably.

Individual buyers are perhaps less well served by the pricing, particularly when similarly styled competitors undercut it by a meaningful margin. But these are meant to catch the corporate ear, pun fully intended.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

• Value score: 3/5

Jabra Evolve3 85: Specs

Model

Jabra Evolve3 85

Weight

220g

Form factor

Over-ear, closed-back

Microphone

Boomless (Jabra ClearVoice, multi-mic DNN)

ANC

Jabra Advanced ANC, adaptive (active during calls)

Battery life (calls)

Up to 25 hours

Battery life (music)

Up to 120 hours (ANC/Busylight off)

Fast charging

5 hours use from 5-minute charge; 10 hours from 10 minutes

Wireless charging

Yes (flat exterior surface supports Qi pads)

Connectivity

Bluetooth 5.4, LC3 codec, pre-paired USB adapter, Bluetooth Native

Dual connectivity

Yes

UC certification

Microsoft Teams, Zoom, Google Meet

Software

Jabra Plus mobile app (Android / iOS); desktop app later in 2026

Replaceable parts

Battery, ear cushions

Colours

Black (March 2026); Warm Grey (April 2026, select markets)

Sustainability

Recycled/bio-circular materials; TCO Gen 10 certified

Jabra Evolve3 85: design

• No boom arm
• Robust construction
• Excellent ergonomics

The first thing most people will notice about the Evolve3 85 is what it is missing. There is no boom arm, and no retractable mic stalk. Considering that one feature probably accounts for the demise of at least half the headsets I’ve seen, eliminating it is a win.

No visual shorthand that announces to the world you are working on a helpdesk. Instead, what you get is a clean, minimal over-ear headset with a matte finish, breathable cushions, and a profile that would sit comfortably alongside any premium consumer headphone.

Jabra describes the aesthetic as contemporary Danish design, which made me immediately think of Princess Leia’s hairstyle, but these aren’t like that at all.

This is a noticeably slimmer design than the Evolve2 it replaces, measuring up to 35 per cent thinner according to Jabra's own figures. The result is a headset that folds into a compact travel case that can slip into a work bag without occupying a dedicated compartment.

My only other concern about the carry case is that it doesn’t have an obvious place for the wireless charger, and the compressed paper/fabric material it's made of isn’t as robust as the Evolve3 85.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

While some headsets use plastic throughout to keep weight and cost down, the amount of metal in these and the quality of the plastic materials used feel appropriately premium for the price point, and the overall construction suggests a product designed for long daily use rather than occasional handling.

Jabra has also included replaceable ear cushions and a replaceable battery, both of which are welcome additions from a longevity perspective and bring the product into compliance with current repair legislation.

Finding that kind of consideration in a business headset is encouraging; finding it in any headset at this price is much less common than it should be.

Another feature I appreciated is the 360-degree busylight that signals availability status from every angle, removing the need to actively communicate when you are on a call.

Small details such as this speak to a design team that has actually thought about how people use headsets at a desk, rather than simply engineering for the product brochure.

My review hardware was specifically designed for Microsoft Teams use, and has that logo on a button on the right side. In fact, most of the controls are on the right side, with the exception of the ANC control and the power button, which are on the left. In this respect, the Evolve3 85 is primarily designed for right-handed people.

Overall, these are a surprisingly elegant piece of audiowear that mixes personal and business use effortlessly.

Design score: 4.5/5

Jabra Evolve3 85: Hardware

• Bluetooth 5.4
• Microsoft Teams vs the World
• ClearVoice

Bluetooth 5.4 with the LC3 codec forms the backbone of the wireless connection, and the package includes a pre-paired USB adapter for secure, low-latency connectivity with a PC. Bluetooth Native allows direct device connections without the adapter for users who prefer a simpler setup.

Dual connectivity is supported throughout, meaning the headset can maintain simultaneous connections to both a computer and a smartphone without requiring manual switching.

One-touch voice access is integrated for AI assistant interactions, and Jabra claims accuracy of over nine out of ten words in voice prompts. That is a specific and testable claim, and one that experienced business users will scrutinise closely. UC certification covers Microsoft Teams, Zoom, and Google Meet, which cover the main platforms used in the UK and European enterprises.

Controls are handled through physical buttons and a straightforward interface. The Jabra Plus mobile app provides equaliser controls, wind noise reduction settings, and firmware update management from a smartphone.

A desktop version of the app is scheduled for later in 2026, which is a notable gap at launch for users who work primarily at a desk. IT teams managing fleet deployments have access to Jabra Plus Management, which handles remote configuration and firmware pushes from a central dashboard.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

The ClearVoice system is the most significant departure from previous generations, since those relied on a physical boom arm to capture voice close to the mouth. The Evolve3 replaces it entirely with a multi-microphone array driven by a deep neural network.

That network was trained on over 60 million sentences and draws on GN's background in hearing aid technology, which gives Jabra a genuine advantage over competitors building similar systems from scratch.

The practical implication is that callers should not notice the absence of a boom arm. Background noise, whether from an open-plan office, a busy cafe, or a commuter train, is intended to be filtered out by the processing rather than physically excluded by proximity microphone placement. Whether that processing holds up in the worst acoustic environments is the most important unresolved question about this product.

Jabra has also added wind noise reduction as a configurable setting in the app, suggesting the microphone system is intended for outdoor use as well as traditional office environments.

That is a meaningful expansion of the use case compared to most UC-certified headsets, and shows how the Evolve3 85 has a foot firmly in both the enterprise and home audio experience.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

• Hardware: 4/5

Jabra Evolve3 85: Performance

• Effective ANC
• Excellent charging options

Jabra has made a clear effort to ensure the Evolve3 85 performs as a music headphone as well as a call headset, and the specifications support that ambition. The LC3 codec provides high-fidelity wireless audio, the over-ear closed-back design offers meaningful passive isolation, and the 120-hour music battery life suggests Jabra expects people to use this for listening as well as talking.

Enhanced Spatial Sound is included to make long calls feel more natural and less tiring. The objective is to present voices as though they are positioned in front of you rather than directly inside your ears, which reduces the cognitive load of extended video meetings. It is a feature that sounds modest in description but makes a genuine difference across a full working day.

The equaliser available through the Jabra Plus app allows personal tuning of the sound profile, which is a welcome addition for anyone who wants to adjust the factory calibration to suit their taste or their music library. The desktop app, when it arrives, should make that process more convenient for office-based users.

The adaptive ANC on the Evolve3 85 adjusts in real time based on both the external environment and the fit of the headset. The second of those factors is more significant than it might appear. Most ANC systems apply a fixed cancellation profile regardless of how well the ear cushions seal against your head. Jabra's approach calibrates continuously, which means the performance should remain consistent even as the headset shifts slightly during a long session.

As an example of how well this works, in my small office, I have a Bambu Lab H2D 3D printer only a metre to my left, and with this headset on, it can be printing at full speed, and it's almost silent to me. Not to say that’s a noisy printer, but it’s much less distracting with the headphones on.

The distinction between this and most competitors is that the ANC does not pause during calls. Active noise cancellation on most business headsets disengages the moment a call begins as the microphone signal takes priority. Jabra has engineered around that compromise, and the result is a headset that should maintain a consistent listening environment whether you are in a meeting or working between calls. That matters considerably in open-plan environments where ambient noise levels can be unrelenting.

The headline battery figures are among the most impressive in the over-ear headset market. Twenty-five hours of call time is sufficient for multiple full working days, and 120 hours of music playback is a figure most consumer headphones cannot approach. Both are measured with ANC and the busy light disabled, so real-world figures will be somewhat lower, but even with both features active, the Evolve3 85 should comfortably outlast a working week on a single charge.

(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)

Fast charging delivers five hours of use from a five-minute charge, which addresses the specific anxiety of reaching for the headset before an important call and finding the battery low. Wireless charging is supported via the flat exterior of the earcups, which means placing the headset face down on a standard Qi pad while at a desk.

For those looking to reduce the cost of these, Jabra wants another $50 for the model that comes with the official charger, whereas a good quality Qi pad made by Anker is only around $20, and it works just as well.

That the battery is also user-replaceable is a genuinely useful feature for long-term ownership and one that separates the Evolve3 from the majority of similarly priced competitors. Having to bin a generally serviceable headset because the battery won’t hold sufficient charge is something that should never happen.

I’m not going to give you my view of its abilities for the reproduction of music, since I’m not an audiophile, and my ears were never professionally tuned. I’ll just say that with drivers of this scale, there isn’t the level of bass you might expect from larger cans, but the range it does offer is consistent.

Overall, these are great for a working environment and acceptable for more general use.

• Performance: 4/5

Jabra Evolve3 85: Final verdict

The Jabra Evolve3 85 ticks so many boxes, it's hard to know where to begin.

It’s stylish, the ANC works exceptionally well, it will last three working days on calls on a single charge, and it can grab enough power in a few minutes to make it to lunch.

The caveat to these beautifully engineered headphones is the cost, above all else.

Yes, the desktop app for these should have been ready at launch, but the phone app is here, and the desktop app is promised soon.

I just wish they were cheaper, since many budget-controlling managers are likely to exclude them purely based on cost. And doing so might prove to be a strategic mistake.

Should I buy a Jabra Evolve3 85?Jabra Evolve3 85 Score Card

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Value

Expensive for call centre headphones

3/5

Design

A major upgrade from the Evolve2

4.5/5

Hardware

Always on ANC and ClearVoice

4/5

Performance

Effective ANC and plenty of charging options

4/5

Overall

Business headset that feels like much more

4.5/5

Buy it if...

You work in a noisy environment
The need for consistent noise cancellation during calls and between them is paramount in a call centre or similar environment. With these, it's easier to understand the caller and focus on their needs.

Your business likes efficiency
These are the perfect choice if your organisation needs UC-certified headsets that can be centrally managed and remotely updated. And if you value repairability, the replaceable battery and cushions make this a product designed to last.View Deal

Don't buy it if...

You are working with a budget
For those buying personally rather than through a business, the price tag is genuinely prohibitive. However, you can make some cost savings on the charging technology, and being able to replace the battery and cushions might make them last longer in the end.

For more business audio solutions, we've reviewed the best headsets for working from home.

Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5: Two-minute review

Let’s be clear from the start. For everyday listening, the Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 are the best earbuds you can get without spending significantly more. They tick every box, deliver across the board and make a compelling case that there’s life beyond Apple for those who have been reluctant to shop around.

They’re the fifth generation of Huawei’s FreeBuds Pro line, which has been around since 2020 and we’ve always rated them well. In fact, I tested the FreeBuds Pro 2 back in 2022. The FreeBuds Pro 4 landed in November 2024 and scored four stars in our review. They were strong but not quite there. The Pro 5 are different and good enough to go head-to-head with the best at this level, including the Apple AirPods Pro 3.

The FreeBuds Pro 5 look and feel more premium than their price suggests, and so does the charging case. They’re smaller and lighter than the Pro 4 at 5.5g per bud, which is noticeable. Build quality is excellent, the stems have a high-shine finish and the case has a satiny coating that feels upscale.

Most importantly, the design translates into a supremely comfortable wear. As someone with small, particular ears who put these through gym sessions, runs and full working days, I can tell you the fit is impressive.

The feature set is extensive. There’s smooth multipoint connectivity, customisable gesture controls that are responsive and the Huawei Audio Connect app is one of my favourites at this level. Battery life reaches around 8.5 hours with ANC off and nearly 6 with it on, with 38 hours total from the case. That’s not as good as rivals for ANC listening time, but the amount of power the case holds is great.

ANC is one of the headline upgrades here. The FreeBuds Pro 5 use a dual-driver system and they work together as noise-cancelling engines, paired with an AI sensing model. In practice, it’s close to silence but without that airless, pressurized quality that heavy ANC can sometimes produce. Call quality benefits from the same tech, I found it to be clear and natural, even in busy environments.

Then there’s sound, which is very good indeed. The dual-driver acoustic system delivers a wide, rich soundstage with strong low-end response, excellent instrument separation and detail that holds up across genres, from driving rock to expansive orchestral soundtracks. I think you’d have to spend significantly more or go wired to do meaningfully better.

Our audio editor Becky Scarrott called these “hands-down Huawei’s best buds yet” after five days of early testing at launch. After several weeks with them, I wholeheartedly agree. They earn their five stars because they’re excellent value, genuinely well-made and perform at a level that earbuds costing more would be proud of.

Now, are they perfect? Not quite. Lossless audio requires a Huawei device, which many don’t have. The design is fractionally chunkier than some rivals at this price too and you don't get foam tips in the box like you did with the Pro 4. But if those are the only cons (and they are), they’re doing well. I’d bet none of these would register on the radar of most everyday listeners.

That’s precisely who I think these buds are for. Not the audiophile chasing the absolutely best sound or the dedicated athlete who needs purpose built workout buds. But the everyday listener who wants the best all-rounders. They've got wide appeal, strong value and no meaningful ecosystem restrictions.

Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 review: Price and release date

(Image credit: Future)

• Released globally in February 2026
• Sells for £179.99 in the UK
• No price hike from past models

The Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 were released in February 2026 in many markets across the UK, Europe and Asia. Though there are still ongoing trade restrictions between Huawei and the US.

The buds cost £179.99 in the UK. But it's worth noting that, at the time of writing, the official Huawei website is offering a £30 off coupon for the FreeBuds Pro 5. This may not last long, but it makes an already great value pair of buds even easier to recommend.

Whether you find them for £179.99 or get the £149.99 deal, they're a good price for earbuds designed to compete with high-end rivals.

Let's put that into context. The latest AirPods Pro cost $249 / £219 / AU$429. So they're undercutting those while being a very solid alternative, particularly for Android users. Similarly, the Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro, which are going to be seen as the top AirPods Pro alternative for Androids users, sell for $249 / £219 / AU$399.

They're pricier than some of our favorite mid-range picks, like the Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 at $149 / £119 and the Nothing Ear (a) at $99 / £99. But I'd say they're positioned as a step above both of those options, so that would make sense here.

Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 review: Specs

Drivers

11mm dynamic woofer and micro-planar tweeter

Active noise cancellation

Yes

Battery life (ANC off)

9 hours buds, 38 hours case

Weight

5.5g per bud, 43g case

Connectivity

Bluetooth 6

Frequency response

10 Hz to 48 kHz

Waterproofing

IP57 buds, IP54 case

Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 review: Features

(Image credit: Future)

• 9/38-hour battery life, less with ANC or features
• Plenty of useful features in the easy-to-use app
• Fantastic ANC

The FreeBuds Pro 5 are packed with features, and almost all of them live inside the Huawei Audio Connect app, which is one of the cleanest companion apps I’ve tested. Everything is easy to find and nothing is buried in sub-menus.

Huawei claims the FreeBuds Pro 5 are the world’s first dual-driver ANC earbuds, meaning both the dynamic driver and the micro planar diaphragm unit work together to tackle noise. The low-frequency driver targeting rumble and bass-heavy interference, the high-frequency driver handling sharper sounds. This hardware is then paired with a real-time AI sensing model that samples ambient noise 400,000 times per second (yes, you read that right!), which means it’s continuously adapting to whatever environment you’re in.

In practice, it’s incredibly effective. I tried them in all sorts of environments and low rumbles, like traffic, air conditioning, the hum of a commute, are all handled incredibly well. The overall effect is close to silence without tipping into the slightly pressurized, airless quality some ANC can produce. I know some people do prefer that, but what Huawei does here is my preference. There’s also a good passive isolation baseline here thanks to the secure fit.

There are four ANC models to pick. Dual-Engine, which adapts automatically to your surroundings. Cozy, which is for quieter environments. General for everyday noise and Ultra for loud environments. With Ultra you might notice more of a pressure sensation, which is worth knowing if you’re sensitive to that feeling, but it does do a good job at eliminating almost all ambient sound.

There’s a good Awareness mode here, which has a bunch of options within it. Standard, Voice Awareness, which filters in voices while suppressing other noises, and Adaptive Awareness, which adjusts dynamically.

Conversation Awareness is also on board. When you start speaking, the buds automatically switch from ANC to Awareness mode and lower the volume, then gradually fade back after around ten seconds once you stop. I found I could hold a natural conversation without touching the buds at all, and the transition back was gradual and smooth rather than jarring. Sony’s Speak to Chat works similarly.

The FreeBuds Pro 5 move up to Bluetooth 6.0 from the Pro 4’s 5.2, and multipoint pairing of two devices is supported. Switching between my laptop and phone during testing was smooth with no lag. There’s also Find My Earbuds, which emits a round from whichever bud you’ve lost. I used it several times when one slipped under my desk, it’s one of those features you’ll be more grateful for than you’d expect.

A new internal antenna promises a 38% improvement in Bluetooth range alongside better interference rejection. I had no dropouts during testing across gym sessions and on the move.

(Image credit: Future)

On the codec side, iPhone users get AAC, Android users get LDAC and Huawei devices get access to lossless audio via L2HC 4.0 at 2.3Mbps. So that lossless tier is firmly Huawei ecosystem only. For the rest of us though, LDAC and AAC are still solid options and the good news is very few other features here are gated behind a Huawei device.

Control across the stems are tap, pinch and swipe, which is a good range for buds. You can customize these in the app and I really liked that they registered with a satisfying, audible little click. Head gesture controls let you answer or reject calls with a nod or a shake, which worked well most of the time. Wear detection pauses playback when you remove a single bud, and you can listen with ANC active in just one earbud, which I liked. There’s also a low-latency mode here for gamers.

Huawei says the FreeBuds Pro 5 last 9 hours with ANC off and around 6 hours with it on, with 38 hours in total from the charging case. During testing, I got just over 8.5 hours with ANC off at 50% volume. I then got nearly 6 hours with ANC on. So that’s close to the claimed figure, though it is worth bearing in mind that these real-world results with ANC active do tend to vary based on environment and mode – I had the Dual-engine setting on for testing.

For context, the AirPods Pro 3 offer 8 hours with ANC on and 10 hours with it off, with 24 hours in total from the case. The Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro come in at 6 hours with ANC on and 7 hours with it off, and 30 hours from the case.

So the FreeBuds Pro 5 don’t beat those figures, but do hold up fairly well. Though the case’s 38 hour total is an advantage over the AirPods. Worth knowing if you travel a lot and know you may have to rely solely on the case for a few days.

One final point worth making when it comes to the battery is that thanks to the solid fit and passive isolation, you won’t always need ANC. I found that for lower noise environments, running on ANC off really extended my listening time without a sacrifice.

• Features score: 4.5/5

Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 review: Design

(Image credit: Future)

• Design is smaller, lighter and more comfortable than ever
• IP57-rated buds make them genuinely workout-friendly
• Lovely case with strong magnets and a handy ring light

The FreeBuds Pro 5 are a clear evolution of the Pro line, and that’s a good thing. As long as you’re on board with stems. They work particularly well for smaller ears and make gesture controls far more reliable than tap-based alternatives. That said, stem-free designs might suit some ear shapes better, so this is a subjective thing.

Huawei says the FreeBuds Pro 5 are 10% smaller and 6% lighter than previous buds and at 5.5g per bud, you can feel it. I do think they’re a fraction chunkier than say the AirPods Pro 3 and a few rivals at this level, but once they’re in the comfort level is genuinely impressive.

I wore them for around three hours straight one morning and for a further four in the afternoon without any ache or fatigue, and this is coming from someone with smaller ears who can be sensitive to heavier buds.

(Image credit: Future)

Huawei says it used more than 10,000 ear profiles to inform the fit here, and it shows. Four silicone tip sizes are included, and I found the medium worked well for me, despite usually needing to reach for the smallest pair.

The one minor gripe here on comfort is the absence of foam tips, which have come with some previous FreeBuds Pro models and are still mentioned in the app, which suggests they may arrive later. Most people seem to prefer silicone anyway, but foam can add passive isolation and a slightly more immersive ANC effect. Though this omission isn’t a dealbreaker by any means.

The stems themselves have shifted from rectangular to a flat oval profile, with a high-shine front panel and metallic detailing round the edges that reads as genuinely premium. I tested the sand/gold shade, which adds to the premium feel, though white, silver and a blue option with a vegan leather case are also available too.

(Image credit: Future)

The new IP57 rating on the buds is a real highlight. That covers sweat, splashes and brief submersion, making them as workout-friendly as an everyday pair of buds gets. I took them out on several runs and to the gym throughout testing and they stayed secure throughout.

The charging case is nicely designed too. At 43g it’s light and pocket-friendly with a smooth, rounded shape and soft film coating that feels premium when you gold it. Strong magnets snap it shut and a hidden hinge keeps the lines clean.

On the front, the halo ring light glows in different colors to indicate battery and pairing status, which is both practical and a nice-looking design touch. The case is IP54-rated now as well, offering solid splash and rain resistance.

All in all, there’s very little to fault where design is concerned. If you want stems, these are among the best-looking and best-built options at this price.

• Design score: 5/5

Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 review: Sound quality

(Image credit: Future)

• New dual-driver acoustic system.
• Dynamic and energetic sound
• Huawei phone needed for lossless audio

The big hardware news for the FreeBuds Pro 5 is a new dual-driver acoustic system, combining a low-frequency dynamic driver with a high-frequency micro planar diaphragm driver.

The low-end response is strong and present from the get-go, with the buds leaning into bass-forward tuning that feels deliberate and punchy. There’s also a bass boosting mode available if you want to push that even further. Impressively, even with that boost applied, the low-end stays controlled. No muddiness or bloat, just a lot of energy and power.

Crucially, they’re not bass-heavy though, a lot of detail survives alongside it. That dual-driver setup handles separation well across the whole frequency range, which keeps mids and highs really clean even when the low-end is doing a lot of work. So the overall character is dynamic and energetic, nothing feels lost in the mix here.

Listening to Queens of the Stone Age’s No One Knows, that dynamic quality is front and centre. Josh Homme’s vocals have a real presence, they’re bright and cutting, but the guitars still drive hard underneath without crowding them out of the picture. Instrument separation is confident here too, and there’s this pleasing sense that the track is opening up at higher volumes rather than compressing. It’s the kind of rock mix that rewards earbuds with genuine low-end grunt, and the FreeBuds Pro 5 deliver that in spades.

But I also loved listening to anything orchestral with them too. Hans Zimmer’s Dune soundtrack is a demanding test, spanning whispered, layered vocals, sweeping strings, dark percussion and heaps of bass, and the Freebuds Pro 5 handle it without flinching.

The Bene Gesserit chants land with an appropriately unsettling, layered depth, while Ripples in the Sand opens into a wide, rich soundstage where every element holds its place. Strings, percussion, and those haunting high vocals all occupy their place in the mix. The soundstage here is genuinely impressive for earbuds at this price, with no detectable distortion even pushed to higher volumes.

(Image credit: Future)

All of the above was tested on default settings, but there’s plenty of room to customize the sound. Eight EQ presets are available, each developed in partnership with the Beijing Central Conservatory of Music. Balanced is the default, which is the most accurate and natural-sounding. That’s the one I kept returning to despite trying and enjoying many of the rest.

Voice brightens things up for vocals. Classical adds a concert hall quality that worked particularly well with those big movie soundtracks, and Bass does exactly what it promises. There are also some purpose built presets for movies, podcasts and games. If none of these work for you, there’s also a 10-band custom EQ that gives you full control.

Spatial Audio with head-tracking is also on-board here and it doesn’t require Dolby Atmos tracks, it works with whatever you’re playing. It’s not usually my preference for music, but paired with the movie preset it added a genuinely immersive quality to films and TV. Worth knowing too that you don’t need a Huawei device to access it.

Call quality is also worth noting here. In a quiet space it’s clean and natural. In a busy market with chatter, loud sounds and low-level rumbling of vans and traffic nearby, some background noise crept in. But my voice remained clear and isolated, which I still found impressive given the conditions. Wind interference caused some wobble on a really blustery day, though I was still perfectly audible. As a serial voice note leaver, these passed that test too.

Between the new hardware, tuning options and the spatial audio, the FreeBuds Pro 5 make a strong case across almost any genre or use case you throw at them.

• Sound quality: 4.5/5

Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 review: Value

(Image credit: Future)

• Great value for money
• Undercuts rivals
• Already promotions on the official Huawei website

It's a bold claim, but I think the FreeBuds Pro 5 are the strongest all-round option at this price right now for everyday listening.

If you have a very specific priority, such as dedicated workout buds or audiophile-grade lossless sound, you may find better value elsewhere. And if you're one of the few people who think the weaknesses are dealbreakers, like no Huawei phone for lossless audio or a preference for tiny, stemless designs, then it's worth factoring that in.

But everyone else who wants great sound, strong ANC and a comfortable, premium-feeling design with all the essential features, then these deliver a lot.

They're even easier to recommend because they're priced lower than most of their rivals at launch. In fact, Huawei is already offering a discount code on them at the time of writing if you head to their official site, which makes them even harder to argue with on value. Can I give them 5.5 stars out of 5 for this section? No? Fine.

• Value: 5/5

Should I buy the Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5?Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 score card

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Features

An excellent suite of features, upgraded driver system and lovely app. Battery life with ANC playback is good but is bested by high-end rivals.

4.5/5

Design

Smaller and lighter than predecessors. They fit very well, look more premium than they should and gestures work are nice with that stem.

5/5

Sound quality

They sound great, call quality is improved and there's a lot of customisation. You only get lossless with Huawei phones, though.

4.5/5

Value

Everything you need is here at a price that undercuts most rivals.

5/5

Buy them if…

You want an AirPods Pro alternative
Maybe you’re on Android, want a cheaper option or just don’t gel with the sound signature of the AirPods. Whatever the reason for wanting to ditch Apple, these are a solid alternative pick.

You want all-rounders for everyday listening
If you really care about audio, workouts or ANC you can find high-end options that specialize in those things, sure. But for an everyday listening experience that ticks all of the boxes, they’re really hard to beat.View Deal

You want premium sound, looks and build at a good price
They really do look, feel and sound more premium than they should. And while we wouldn’t describe them as affordable, they’re certainly excellent value for the price. View Deal

Don’t buy them if…

You don’t like the stem design
They have long stems, there’s no getting away from it. Some people love how they look, fit and work with gestures. But if you’re not a fan, you might prefer a more compact look, like the Technics EAH-AZ100.

You want lossless
If you have a Huawei phone these are a no-brainer, have at it. If you don’t and you’d really like lossless sound, you won’t find it here. Try the Cambridge Audio Melomania A100 instead.

You already own the FreeBuds Pro 4
There are upgrades here, so if only the best ANC, transparency and calls are a priority for you, it’s worth it. For everyone else, you shouldn’t rush to upgrade.

Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 review: Also consider

Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5

Apple AirPods Pro 3

Technics EAH-AZ100

Drivers

11mm dynamic woofer and micro-planar tweeter

'Custom high-excursion' Apple driver

10mm free-edge dynamic

Active noise cancellation

Yes

Yes

Yes

Battery life (ANC on)

6 hours (buds) 25 hours (case)

8 hours (buds) 24 hours (case)

10 hours (buds) 28 hours (case)

Weight

5.5g (buds) 43g (case)

5.6g (buds) 44g (case)

5.9g (buds) 42g (case)

Connectivity

Bluetooth 6

Bluetooth 5.3

Bluetooth 5.3

Waterproofing

IP57

IP57

IPX4

AirPods Pro 3
The Freebuds Pro 5 give them a run for their money. But Apple's AirPods Pro are still some of the best wireless earbuds for iPhone owners, with great ANC, unique features and slightly better battery life with ANC playback.
Read our full AirPods Pro 3 review

Technics EAH-AZ100
Not many earbuds will beat the FreeBuds Pro 5 for sound, but these Technics are the best. They also don't have a stem-like design, which some of you may prefer. Though they are considerably more expensive.
Read our full Technics EAH-AZ100 review

How I tested the Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5

• Tested for three weeks
• Tested at home, on walks, on public transport in a city, working in a cafe and a co-working space, while running and at the gym

I tested the Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5 for just over three weeks to write this review. I mostly had them paired with an iPhone 16 Pro, but I also used them with a MacBook Pro.

I used a range of different music and film apps to test the buds. They played music from Spotify, Qobuz and tunes from internal storage, as well as videos from YouTube, Prime Video and Mubi.

I’ve tested many headphones and earbuds over the past 13 years as a tech journalist. Including devices from top audio brands, like Bose, Sony, Sennheiser, as well as cheaper buds from the likes of JLab, Nothing, Skullcandy and more. I’m interested in tech that prioritises comfort and ease of use.

• First reviewed in March 2026

• Read TechRadar's reviews guarantee

Asus ROG Cetra Open: Two-minute review

I’ve become very fond of open earbuds recently, and was pretty excited when Asus announced the ROG Cetra Open. If you’re not familiar with the open ear style, they’re basically earbuds that clip onto your ears and have drivers that sit a few millimeters away from your ear canal rather than plug with a silicon tip.

They’re incredibly comfortable to wear and help you maintain awareness of your surroundings, which is great when you're out and about and would rather avoid getting hit by passing bikes and the like. The trade-off is generally that you lose out on noise cancellation, isolation, and the earbuds’ ability to effectively produce bass.

Open earbuds seem like a bit of a strange choice for gaming, given the fact that they are usually towards runners or gymgoers, but I think Asus might be on to a winner with the concept. The level of comfort they offer is second to none, and I always appreciate the ability to hear myself while chatting in a match.

Unfortunately, the Asus ROG Cetra Open really stumble, presumably as a result of being the brand’s first pair of open gaming earbuds. For starters, they’re ridiculously expensive at an eye-watering $229.99 / £174.99 - that’s more than many of the best wireless gaming headsets and triple excellent non-gaming alternatives such as the Huawei FreeArc Buds. While the Asus pair does sound much better overall and has vastly superior microphones, they’re still not worth such a higher cost in my eyes.

The case that they sit in is also absurdly massive. It’s big enough to be uncomfortable in your pocket and, at the point you have to carry around a rucksack just to have space for your earbuds, it’s safe to say something has gone seriously wrong in the design department. To make matters worse, it feels very hollow and plasticky, which is unacceptable in a product at this price.

All of this leaves the Asus ROG Cetra Open difficult to recommend outside of a sale or if you’re really, really desperate for an open gaming pair. Hopefully, the brand’s next attempt is cheaper and more feature-dense, because there is real potential here.

(Image credit: Future)Asus ROG Cetra Open: Price and availability

• Cost $229.99 / £174.99 / around AU$330
• Available via the Asus website, Amazon, and Newegg
• Very expensive for gaming earbuds

The Asus ROG Cetra Open earbuds retail for $229.99 / £174.99 and can be purchased via the Asus website in the US and UK, in addition to Amazon and Newegg in the US.

At this price, they’re substantially more expensive than our current favorite premium gaming buds, the SteelSeries Arctis GameBuds, which go for $159.99 / £159.99 / AU$359, and you’re paying a massive premium for the open design.

For PlayStation owners, the $199.99 / £179.99 / AU$249.95 Sony Inzone Buds are another major competitor, while the PlayStation Pulse Explore earbuds are also in the mix, and offer out-of-the-box PlayStation Portal compatibility too.

They’re also pretty pricey compared to other open earbuds, costing much more than the Huawei FreeArc Buds and Honor Earbuds Open, but less than the super premium Bose Ultra Open Earbuds.

Asus ROG Cetra Open: Specs

Price

$229.99 / £174.99 / around AU$330

Weight

0.3oz / 11g (per earbud bud)

Compatibility

PC, PS5, PS4, Nintendo Switch, Nintendo Switch 2, mobile

Connection type

Wireless (Bluetooth / 2.4GHz dongle)

Battery life

16+ hours (48+ hours with case)

Features

Immersion mode, RGB lighting, EQ settings

Software

Gear Link (web)

Asus ROG Cetra Open: Design and features

• Generic, cheap-looking design
• Browser-based software
• A few gaming features

I’ll be completely honest here: I absolutely hate how the Asus ROG Cetra Open looks. They’re bulky and weirdly angular for a pair of open earbuds, and look nowhere near as sleek and stylish as the alternatives by Huawei and Honor. In fact, they look more like they’re by a weirdly named off-brand that you would find scrolling too far down Amazon rather than a major hardware manufacturer. This certainly isn’t helped by the RGB lighting with its overly garish default rainbow pattern, or the fact that the plastic materials used on each bud don’t feel too premium.

The case is just as hideous and, worse still, comically large: it’s only slightly more compact than the average mid-size phone and about four times as thick. This makes it difficult to fit in a pocket and annoying to bring around with you. Sure, lots of open-ear buds have cases on the bulkier side, but I’ve not used any quite as impractical as this. I don’t quite understand why Asus is advertising these earbuds so heavily as suitable for sports, as a result of this, as surely anyone running or at the gym would favor something with a case that's more compact.

(Image credit: Future)

Part of the reason the case is so big is to make room for the 2.4GHz USB-C wireless dongle. The dongle has a pass-through feature, with its own USB-C port that you can use to charge a controller, for example, but it’s an odd L-shape that tends to block more than one port when it’s plugged in.

Rather than a traditional application, the Asus ROG Cetra Open relies on a browser-based program called Gear Link. I really appreciate this, as it removes the need to install any software bloat and gives you immediate access to settings on practically any PC or phone when you need them. Major features it lets you tweak include equalizer settings (with pre-sets for gaming, movies, music, and so on), RGB lighting effects, and Immersion Mode. Immersion Mode seems to be some form of active noise cancellation (ANC), though I found that it wasn’t particularly effective at blocking even low-level background sound.

There’s also optional multipoint connectivity, letting you pair two devices at once for the times when you want to game while listening to music or taking a phone call.

(Image credit: Future)Asus ROG Cetra Open: Performance

• Sound great with a surprising amount of bass
• Secure and comfortable fit
• Microphones are decent

For a pair of open earbuds, the Asus ROG Cetra Open sounds great with some surprisingly punchy bass. The sound is crisp and clean, with decent tuning out of the box - though I would still recommend selecting the flat EQ in its software. It’s hard to overstate just how comfortable they are to wear, too. I have used them for an entire day of work with absolutely no discomfort or fatigue, making them some of the most comfortable earbuds that I’ve ever used.

They’re very secure on the ears too, and can easily withstand walking or even running. The included neck band can be used for some added peace of mind, too, ensuring that they will stay on your person even if they do come loose.

The ability to hear your surroundings is also surprisingly useful, though it does come with some drawbacks. If you’re using these headphones in an office environment, you can easily chat to others without taking them out of yours and when exercising outdoors, you don’t need to worry about drowning out oncoming traffic. In a gaming context, though, it’s a bit of a double-edged sword. You’re going to hear pretty much everything in your surroundings, even if you’re playing at home, which makes it difficult to get truly immersed. The headphones do have an Immersion Mode feature, which seemingly enables some kind of ANC, but it’s not effective at blocking noise at all.

The microphones of the Asus ROG Cetra Open are decent for a pair of earbuds. They’re not broadcast quality by any means, but they do a decent job picking up your voice and will ensure that you can be heard clearly in most situations. The battery life is also nothing to complain about, with around 16 hours of use for each bud and an additional three charges held in the case.

The included dongle makes it easy to use the headphones with consoles, and cuts down potential latency, though I do find its L shape design a little awkward. If you’re not careful, it can block adjacent USB ports, though it does offer USB-C passthrough that somewhat mitigates this annoyance.

(Image credit: Future)Should I buy the Asus ROG Cetra Open?Buy it if…

You're after open gaming earbuds
If you want a pair of open earbuds designed specifically for gaming, there really aren’t any real alternatives to the Asus ROG Cetra Open, making them your best option by default.

You’re desperate for earbuds suitable for both gaming and sport
If, for some reason, you really, really want to use the same earbuds for gaming and sport, then the Asus ROG Cetra Open is one of the few products geared towards both.

Don’t buy it if…

You’re on any kind of budget
The biggest drawback of the Asus ROG Cetra Open is easily its massive price tag. If you’re after a pair of open earbuds, there are plenty of cheaper options out there, and if you can sacrifice the open design, premium gaming earbud models come in much cheaper.

You love being immersed in your games
The open design inherently can’t block noise as effectively as closed models that create a seal in your ear. If you value immersion and cutting out distractions, choose something else.

Also consider...

After some alternatives to the Asus ROG Cetra Open? Here’s one gaming model and one more general pair of open earbuds to consider.

Asus ROG Cetra Open

SteelSeries Arctis GameBuds

Huawei FreeArc Buds

Price

$229.99 / £174.99 / around AU$330

$159.99 / £159.99 / AU$359

£99.99 (around $130 / AU$200)

Weight

0.3oz / 11g (per earbud bud)

0.19oz / 5.3g (each bud); 1.7oz / 48.7g (case)

0.31oz / 8.9 g (per bud)

Compatibility

PC, PS5, PS4, Nintendo Switch, Nintendo Switch 2, mobile

GameBuds for PlayStation: PS5, PS4, Nintendo Switch, PC, Mac, Meta Quest 2/3, mobile; GameBuds for Xbox: Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PS5, PS4, Nintendo Switch, PC, Mac, Meta Quest 2/3

Mobile

Connection type

Wireless (Bluetooth / 2.4GHz dongle)

2.4Ghz (via USB-C), Bluetooth 5.3 (mobile)

Wireless (Bluetooth)

Battery life

16+ hours (48+ hours with case)

Up to 40 hours (buds 10 hours; case 30 hours)

7 hours (earbuds), 23 hours (total)

Features

Immersion mode, RGB lighting, EQ settings

360° Spatial Audio, Qi Wireless Charging Case, 6mm neodymium drivers, four-mic ANC, transparency mode, in-ear detection/sensor, IP55 rating, fast charge, companion app with more than 100 presets

Companion app

Software

Gear Link (web)

Arctis Companion App (mobile), SteelSeries Sonar (PC)

Huawei AI Life (mobile)

SteelSeries Arctis GameBuds
My go-to gaming earbuds and easily the best premium pair that money can buy right now. They boast excellent sound, great companion software, and some highly effective ANC to keep you immersed in your game.

For more information, check out our full SteelSeries Arctis GameBuds review

Huawei FreeArc Buds
This more affordable, general-use pair is my current open earbuds of choice for when I’m outdoors. They’re just as comfortable as the Asus pair, but much more stylish. They’re not designed for gaming, though, and you lose some sound quality.

For more information, check out our full Huawei FreeArc Buds reviewView Deal

How I tested the Asus ROG Cetra Open

• Tested for more than a month
• Used for gaming and general music listening
• Compared against other open earbuds and gaming earbuds

I tested the Asus ROG Cetra Open earbuds for more than a month, using them as my go-to headphones for practically everything in that time. I spent hours using them for gaming on both PC and PS5 in addition to taking calls with friends over Discord. I took them with me daily to the office too, wearing them outside to listen to music and for taking meetings at work,

Throughout my time with the earbuds, I compared them frequently to many of the best gaming earbud models, particularly the SteelSeries Arctis GameBuds. I also evaluated them against open earbuds that I have tried, like the Honor Earbuds Open and Huawei FreeArc Buds.

Read more about how we test

First reviewed March 2026