The Dreame AirStyle Era is an eight-in-one multi-styler that works as a dryer and creates smooth, curly, bouncy, or straightened styles from a single device.
On paper, it looks like one for TechRadar's best hair styler roundup, and it's the follow-up to the seven-in-one AirStyle Pro, addressing some of that model's most obvious gaps. Namely, adding a diffuser for the first time, and replacing the Pro's flyaway attachment with a U-shaped straightening nozzle.
The auto-wrap curl barrels remain the headline act. The 360-degree airflow draws hair in automatically and produces bouncy, natural-looking curls without the need to manually wind sections around a barrel.
For fine to medium hair, the results are impressive, and at $349.99 / £349 / AU$699 the Era undercuts the Dyson Airwrap by $250 / £130 / AU$150 while producing comparable curl results as an Airwrap alternative. The smoothing brushes perform well too, and the diffuser is a welcome addition for anyone with naturally curly or wavy hair.
The Dreame AirStyle Era styling system includes interchangeable attachments for drying, smoothing, curling and volumizing (Image credit: Future)The issues are harder to ignore, though. The maximum temperature of 176F / 80C — unchanged from the AirStyle Pro — will be a limiting factor for anyone with thicker or longer hair. You could rope in one of the best hair dryers for that first stage, but that rather defeats the point of an all-in-one tool. The straightening nozzle is also more fiddly than expected, not to mention time consuming.
None of these are dealbreakers on their own, but together they add up to a tool that falls slightly short of its potential. The Era is still the most complete multi-styler Dreame has produced, and the most attractive multi-styler I've tested, and at this price it's a worthy Airwrap dupe, but it needs to be better than it is in a few key areas to make a truly compelling case.
That's the two-minute version; read on for my full Dreame AirStyle Era review.
Dreame AirStyle Era review: price & availabilityThe Dreame AirStyle Era costs $349.99 / £349 / AU$699 and is available directly from Dreame and Amazon in the US, Dreame in the UK, and from Dreame Australia as well as from several third-party retailers.
It sits closer in price to the $279.99 Shark FlexStyle in the US (which costs AU$499 in Australia), but is more akin in terms of features and attachments to the $599.99 / AU$849 Dyson Airwrap. It's the follow-up to Dreame's seven-in-one AirStyle Pro, which had a higher list price of $399.99 in the US but was rarely sold at that, while the latter's list price is lower in Australia at AU$599.
(There are also other, cheaper Dyson Airwrap dupes, but few come with the auto-wrap curl barrels of these four stylers.)
In comparison to its predecessor, the AirStyle Era swaps the Flyaway Attachment of the Pro for a U-shaped straightening nozzle and adds a diffuser for the first time, addressing one of the glaring gaps in the original's feature set.
It's also had a meaningful upgrade under the hood — the NTC temperature sensor now checks 1,000 times per second compared to 300 on the AirStyle Pro, which in practice means more consistent heat distribution and less risk of spikes that could cause damage.
Weight (styler only, no cord)
0.64lbs / 0.29kg
Dimensions (styler only)
1.76 x 1.76 x 10.2in / 4.5 x 4.5 x 26cm
Cord
9.2ft / 2.8m
Temperatures (US):
2 (122F / 50C and 176F / 80C) + cool shot (room temperature)
Temperatures (UK)
2 (122F / 50C and 176F / 80C) + cool shot (82F / 28C)
Speeds (US)
3 (50m/s, 55m/s, 60m/s)
Speeds (UK):
3 (50m/s, 57m/s, 65m/s)
Wattage
1,300W
Attachments
Fast dryer, straightening nozzle, diffuser nozzle, 32mm auto-wrap barrels (L+R), hard smoothing brush, soft smoothing brush, round volumizing brush
The UK listing features different specifications than the US page – 28°C/55°C/80°C for temperatures and 50m/s, 57m/s, 65m/s for wind speeds. We tested the US model so use the US figures throughout.
Dreame AirStyle Era review: designThe Dreame AirStyle Era follows the same basic design as its predecessor (and all other multi-stylers for that matter) – a tube-shaped dryer onto which you twist different styling heads.
It comes in a single pink colorway, not too dissimilar to the pink Dyson Airwrap i.d, with bronze accents at either end, and a soft pebbled leather-texture grip running the length of the handle.
It feels and looks solid and luxurious, and at 0.64lbs without the cord, it's light enough that your arm doesn't start aching even when working through a full set of curls.
The controls consist of two buttons with LEDs that let you cycle through the two heat settings. and three wind speeds. The cool shot is built into the top of the on/off slider rather than given its own dedicated button, and you enable and disable it by sliding up once for on, and sliding up again for off.
The AirStyle Era’s textured handle feels solid and luxurious and features dedicated controls for airflow, temperature and power settings (Image credit: Future)These controls sit at a natural thumb position on the handle and toe a delicate line between being easy to control mid-style and difficult to press accidentally. This is much rarer on stylers than it should be.
At the base of the handle is a removable dual intake filter— an inner stainless steel mesh that keeps fine hair and particles out of the motor, and an outer mesh that prevents tangling.
A small cleaning brush is included for maintenance, and the filter is straightforward to remove and reattach. Attached to this filter is the cord that runs to 9.2ft / 2.8m with a 360-degree anti-tangle swivel at the handle end.
Each of the eight attachments twist on using the same mechanism as the AirStyle Pro, but unlike the heads on the older model, the Era's attachments securely lock into place because they're also magnetic. This was a major complaint in our AirStyle Pro review and I'm glad it's been resolved.
In terms of the attachments, the line-up is as follows:
The two additions — the straightening nozzle and diffuser — address the most obvious gaps in the original AirStyle Pro's feature set.
If you wanted smooth, straight hair or defined natural curls from the Pro, you needed separate tools entirely. The Era fixes that, and the result is a kit that not only covers the full range of everyday styling needs, but it makes it the only styler that can truly rival the Dyson Airwrap in terms of scope and scale.
Elsewhere, everything ships in a leather-textured storage box that keeps the attachments organized and easy to find, plus you get a travel bag if you need something more portable.
I started, as Dreame recommends, by removing most of the water in my hair with the fast dryer attachment. Like all multi-stylers of this type, you need to get hair to around 80% dry before switching to any of the styling attachments for best results, and the fast dryer handled that first stage well enough on my fine, shoulder-length hair.
It's not the hottest of stylers though, and anyone with thicker or longer hair may find themselves reaching for a standalone dryer to get there faster. This was a complaint with the original Pro and hasn't been fixed, it seems.
Dreame AirStyle Era soft smoothing brush (left), hard smoothing brush (center) and round volumizing brush (right) attachments (Image credit: Future)The auto-wrap curling barrels are where the Era earns its keep. The 360-degree airflow draws hair in and wraps it around the barrel automatically, producing bouncy, defined curls without the need to manually wind sections. The results hold well, and the curls have a natural quality that can be hard to achieve with traditional tongs. The catch is that if you want the curls to go in different directions, you need to physically swap between the left and right attachment. This isn't just tricky, because the attached barrel is hot, but it interrupts your rhythm. The Dyson Airwrap handles this on a single, multi-directional barrel, and once you've used that system it's hard not to notice the difference here.
The straightening nozzle is the most interesting new addition on paper — a U-shaped head that uses dual airflow channels to smooth and straighten without heating plates. It's more intuitive than the flyaway attachment it replaced, while producing a very similar finish, but I found it more fiddly than I'd hoped. You can only smooth small sections at a time and this takes a while, which feels like a step backwards for anyone who relied on the flyaway attachment for quick touch-ups and frizz control.
The diffuser attachment is a new addition to the AirStyle Era compared to the previous AirStyle Pro and it's great at enhancing natural curls and waves while reducing frizz (Image credit: Future)The diffuser does what it should. For naturally curly or wavy hair, it distributes airflow evenly without disturbing the curl pattern, and the results are noticeably better than using the fast dryer attachment on the same hair type. It's not doing anything the category hasn't seen before, but its absence from the AirStyle Pro was a gap, and it's good to have it here.
The fast dryer attachment quickly removes moisture before styling; it's great for fine-to-medium hair but people with thicker and/or longer hair might get frustrated with the device's temperatures (Image credit: Future)Finally, the brushes. The soft and hard smoothing brushes both perform well. The soft brush is gentle on fine or fragile hair, with the airflow automatically redirecting downward when attached to leave your hair feeling smooth. The hard brush handles coarser or more tangled hair well, and separates knots without pulling.
In testing, my favorite brush is the round volumizing brush. It's great for lifting roots and adding shape at the ends and it can even create loose curls.
In terms of noise levels, Dreame claims it produces 76dB, and in testing I recorded 79dB on the highest speed setting. That's slightly louder than the spec sheet suggests although not unreasonable for a tool of this type and it's quiet enough to hear music or have a conversation.
The straightening nozzle (pictured) has replaced the flyaway attachment from the previous Pro model and helps smooth hair (Image credit: Future)Attribute
Notes
Rating
Value
Competitively priced against the Dyson Airwrap and broader than the Shark FlexStyle in terms of attachments, though the performance doesn't always match the promise.
3.5 / 5
Design
Comfortable, well-balanced, and good-looking with an improved twist-on attachment mechanism.
4.5 / 5
Performance
Strong curling and volumizing results, but the straightening nozzle disappoints and temperature limits will be a factor for thicker hair types.
4 / 5
Buy it if...You want Dyson Airwrap results without the Dyson price
At $349.99, the Era undercuts the Airwrap by $250 with the auto-wrap curl barrels, in particular, producing on par results.
You want one tool that does everything
The Era's eight attachments cover drying, curling, straightening, smoothing, volumizing and diffusing from a single device.
You have fine or medium hair
The Era's temperature range works well for finer hair types, producing good curl and smoothing results without the risk of excessive heat damage.
Don't buy it if...You have thick or long hair
The Era's maximum temperature may not be enough to dry and style thicker or longer hair.
You rely on frizz control and flyaway taming
The straightening nozzle that replaces the Pro's flyaway attachment is more fiddly and less effective for smoothing.
You want effortless directional curls
Switching between left and right curl directions means swapping the barrels over manually. If you want both directions without the interruption, the Dyson Airwrap's multidirectional barrel is a better choice.
Dreame AirStyle Era: also considerDreame AirStyle Era (reviewed)
Dreame Airstyle Pro
Dyson Airwrap i.d.
Shark FlexStyle
Weight (styler only, no cord):
0.64lbs / 0.29kg
0.6lbs / 0.3kg
1.4lbs / 0.6kg XXCHECK
1.5 lbs / 0.7kg
Styler dimensions (L x W):
10.2 x 1.8in / 26 x 4.5cm
10.2 x 1.8in / 26 x 4.5cm
10.7 x 1.9in / 27.2 x 4.8cm
11.3 x 1.7in / 28.7 x 4.4cm
Cord:
9.2ft / 2.8m
9.2ft / 2.8m
8.5 ft / 2.7m
8ft / 2.4m
Temperatures:
2 + cool shot
2 + cool shot
2 + cool shot
3 + cool shot
Speeds:
3
3
3
3
Wattage:
1,300W
1,300W
1,300W
1,400W (US), 1,600W (UK)
List price:
$349.99 / £349
$399.99 / £299 / AU$599
$599.99 / £479.99 / AU$849
$279.99 / £269.99 / AU$499.99
Dyson Airwrap i.d.
The Airwrap i.d. is king in this category, both in terms of price and features. This multistyler comes with a switch that launches an automated wrap > curl > cool shot sequence, for maximum ease. It can also do clockwise and anticlockwise curls on the same barrel.
Read our full Dyson Airwrap i.d. review
Dreame AirStyle Pro
The AirStyle Pro is a stylish, well-designed multi-styler with a strong attachment lineup, but it's let down by temperatures that aren't hot enough for most hair types and attachments that don't clip on securely enough. If you can work around those limitations, it's a capable tool at a fair price.
Read our full Dreame AirStyle Pro review
Shark FlexStyle
The FlexStyle is a very similar proposition to the AirStyle in that it isn't as good as the original AirWrap, but it's a solid alternative if you don't want to spend megabucks. It looks slightly less stylish than the AirStyle but is all-round a more effective tool in my opinion.
Read our full Shark FlexStyle review
How I tested the Dreame Airstyle EraI used the AirStyle Era as my main styling tool for a week. During this time I used it to dry my hair, and tested all the different attachments, paying particular attention to the auto-wrap curlers.
I compared the styling results to what I managed to achieve with other similar stylers I've tested – including the Dyson Airwrap i.d. and Shark FlexStyle. I also assessed how easy the styler was to use and the effectiveness of its design and features.
Read more about how we test
The U.S. men's national team chose to play a pair of highly-ranked, super competitive teams in the final lead-up to the World Cup: Senegal and Germany. The matches showed the U.S. is ready.
(Image credit: Jamie Squire)
In South Africa and Mozambique, health care providers say cancellation or redirection of U.S. PEPFAR funding under the Trump administration have already endangered vulnerable people and cost lives.
(Image credit: Gulshan Khan for NPR)
New research suggests the fuzzy insects may be capable of spontaneously solving problems the way animals with much larger brains do.
(Image credit: Mikko Törmänen/University of Oulu)
American manufacturer Cuisinart is known for its range of high-quality kitchen appliances at affordable prices. The Power Blend Immersion Blender follows suit, offering versatility and convenience for less than $70 / £50 / AU$90.
his powerful four-in-one stick blender comes with several convenient accessories and attachments, including a food processor (with a mixing/chopping blade and reversible shredding/slicing disc), a chef’s whisk, a blending shaft, and a prep-and-store cup that makes prepping and storing foods like whipped cream and omelette mix a breeze. It’s even got an ergonomic handle design to make use and maneuvering more comfortable.
(Image credit: Future)The results are impressive, with the Power Blend’s pressure-controlled speed giving you more control over its use and quickly whisking eggs, blending soups, and grating cheese.
However, it’s not without its flaws. This appliance may leave some food unprocessed or blended, and the blenders' pressure controls may not be suited to those with restricted hand or wrist movement (especially when turning it on). These may or may not be dealbreakers for you, depending on your individual needs, but they’re enough to hold the Cuisinart Power Blend Immersion Blender back from a position among our top blender picks.
The Cuisinart Power Blend Immersion Blender is priced at £49.99 (about $70 / AU$90), making it more affordable than competitors such as the Ninja Power Duo Immersion Blender ($79.99, roughly £60 / AU$110) and the Bosch ErgoMaster Series 6 (£99.99, or about $140 / AU$210), which is one of the best blenders on the market. Unfortunately, this product isn’t available in the US or Australia.
Considering the versatility and power of the Cuisinart Power Blend Immersion Blender, it offers fantastic value for money. What’s more, third-party retailers like Amazon and Costco tend to offer a discount, bringing the price down to £42.99 – offering more bang for your buck.
Review Model
HB500U
Accessories/attachments
Detachable blending shaft, chef's whisk, 700ml prep-and-store cup, 950ml food processor (chopping/mixing blade, reversible slicing/shredding disc), blade storage cover, canvas storage bag
Smart control
No
Rated power
400W
Dishwasher safe
Certain parts (food processor bowl, pusher, chopping/mixing blade, slicing/shredding disc, prep-and-store cup and lid)
Guarantee
Three syear
Cuisinart Power Blend Immersion Blender: designThe Cuisinart Power Blend Immersion Blender has a silver base that houses its motor and an ergonomic handle design that makes it comfortable to use and maneuver – especially if you have restricted mobility in your hand or wrist. Near the top of the handle is a variable, pressure-controlled speed button (with an LED light at the very top indicating the speed) and an unlock/on button.
At the bottom of the base is an attachment release button, with attachments able to be inserted and locked in with ease. This versatile immersion blender comes with three main attachments: a blending shaft, a 950ml food processor, and a chef’s whisk. In addition, the appliance comes with a canvas storage bag to keep all the bits in and a convenient 700ml prep-and-store cup and lid – though the cup lid did come unstuck a few times for us.
FutureFutureFutureThe blending shaft comes with a protective blade guard, allowing it to be used in glass, enamel, and non-stick vessels, while minimising splashing, which we found very effective. It also comes with a blade storage cover to allow the shaft to be safely stored. The full-sized chef’s whisk is attached to the base with a detachable gearbox and works a treat, especially when combined with the prep-and-store cup.
The food processor features a lid with a decent-sized feed chute (that could fit a large carrot vertically) and pusher, with a reversible slicing/shredding disc and mixing/chopping blade included and easily inserted into the work bowl.
FutureFutureFutureTo turn the appliance on, you need to press the unlock button while pressing the speed control button, before releasing the unlock, a bit like the mechanism seen on some lawnmowers. While this is a great child-safe feature, it took us a few tries to start the blender initially. Even when we’d worked out the system, holding both buttons simultaneously was uncomfortable, especially as you need to be mindful of the pressure you’re applying to the speed control.
While testing the chef whisk feature with some eggs in the prep-and-store cup. While trying to apply enough pressure to turn the blender on, we accidentally applied too much, resulting in our raw eggs splattering all over the kitchen.
(Image credit: Future)This brings us nicely on to cleaning. Certain parts of the Power Blend are dishwasher safe: the food processor bowl, pusher, chopping/mixing blade, slicing/shredding disc, and prep-and-store cup and lid. However, the blending shaft and food processor lid need to be hand-washed, and the base should be wiped down. While the blending shaft and base are fairly easy to clean, the food processor lid is less so; it can't be immersed in water, so cleaning inside the feed chute is somewhat challenging.
Another issue we found with this stick blender was the heat the motor emitted when blending soup. We used the appliance for about two minutes, occasionally stopping and starting, and the handle was warm to the touch, suggesting the motor may be overheating. As such, we recommend not using this immersion blender continuously for too long or taking breaks if the handle begins to get quite warm.
The first thing we tested was the Cuisinart Power Blend Immersion Blender’s blending shaft attachment. After boiling a chunky 1L of homemade vegetable soup (with carrots, onions, cauliflower, potatoes, and a leek) until the veg was soft, we let it cool before blending on a medium-to-high pressure.
After around two minutes of blending, the soup was pretty smooth, but a few rebel chunks of cauliflower remained. As mentioned previously, at this point, the handle began to heat up, so we didn’t want to push it any more.
FutureFutureNext, we tested the chef’s whisk attachment. While the whisk seems quite flimsy, it’s pretty impressive. After cleaning up our prior disaster – and becoming more mindful of how sensitive the pressure controls are – we applied minimum pressure to our remaining eggs (mixed with milk and herbs) and had perfectly whisked eggs in a matter of seconds. It was so quick, we didn’t have time to whip out our phone and time it.
The food processor was equally impressive, though it isn’t without its flaws. We tested the mixing/chopping blade first, adding all the ingredients for a saag paste (including garlic, wilted spinach, veggie oil, spices, and coriander). It took around 30 seconds to make the paste, but it was loud: around 88 to 90 decibels. While most of the paste was mixed well, there were some less mixed parts at the bottom, under the blades, though it wasn’t enough to be a dealbreaker.
FutureFutureWe also tested chopping a red onion with this blade, chopped into large chunks. It only took three or four short, one-second pulses of high-speed power to chop the onion. However, this was also loud – between 90 and 94 decibels – the cuts were largely uneven. We were impressed that the results weren’t overly wet, as we’ve seen when chopping onions with other powerful food processors.
FutureFutureFutureNext, we tested the shredding/slicing disc, beginning with shredding (or grating) 50g of mature cheddar cut into rectangular blocks to fit the feed chute. While the cheese was grated in under 10 seconds, there was a lot of unshredded cheese on top of the disc.
We also experienced this using the slicing disc with a large carrot. While it took less than five seconds to slice the carrot, the slices were uneven, and there were some unsliced carrot remnants on top of the disc afterwards.
FutureFutureFutureOverall, the Cuisinart Power Blend Immersion Blender performs well, offering a lot of versatility and largely impressive results – but it does come with a few quirks that may irk some more than others.
Attribute
Notes
Score
Value
At just £49.99 (about $70 / AU$90), this immersion blender is considerably more affordable than its competitors.
5/5
Design
This blender offers a lot of versatility with its attachments, and we particularly like its ergonomic design. But while its pressure controls offer more command over speed, it can be tricky to get right and the handle can get quite hot.
4/5
Performance
This appliance can blend, whisk, slice, shred, mix, and more, and while the results are largely impressive, we did find some food was left unprocessed and cuts were uneven.
4.5/5
Buy it ifYou want to pare down your kitchen appliances
The Cuisinart Power Blend Immersion Blender does a lot more than blending; its versatile attachments whisk, whip, puree, slice, chop, mix, and more. So, you don’t necessarily need a separate food processor or electric whisk – saving you valuable kitchen storage space.
You're on a tight budget
At £49.99 (about $70 / AU$90), this affordable immersion blender offers excellent value for money. What’s more, third-party retailers like Amazon and Costco often drop the price even further.View Deal
Don't buy it ifYou struggle with pressure controls
While this blender has an ergonomic, comfortable handle design, its pressure controls (and particularly maneuvering to turn it on) may prove a struggle to those with restricted hand or wrist movement and strength.
You want a quiet appliance
When operating, this blender’s food processor attachment can get pretty loud (around 94 decibels). While the blender shaft is quieter, it’s still not as quiet as the likes of the Bosch ErgoMaster Series 6.
Cuisinart Power Blend Immersion Blender: also considerIf you're not sure whether this is the right blender for you, here are two other options to add to your shortlist.
Bosch Ergomaster Series 9
This premium stick blender is comfortable in the hand, an a powerhouse in the kitchen. With its food processor attachment, whisk, and serious motor, it can easily replace three food prep appliances in one.
Read our full Bosch Ergomaster Series 9 review
Ninja Power Duo Immersion Blender
Whether you're making pasta sauce, meringue, or hummus, this budget-friendly blender has you covered. It doesn't have the sheer power of the Bosch model above, but will be just fine for most kitchens.
Read our full Ninja Power Duo Immersion Blender review
How I tested the Cuisinart Power Blend Immersion BlenderI tested the Cuisinart Power Blend Immersion Blender by preparing a wide variety of foods, including eggs, curry paste, and vegetable soup. I also used its food processor attachment to shred cheese, and chop various vegetables, and compared the results with those from a dedicated food processor. I cleaned the blender thoroughly after use, following the manufacturer's instructions. For more details, see how we test, review, and rate products at TechRadar.
First reviewed June 2026.
The 8849 Tank Pad Ultra arrives as the company's most ambitious device to date. It builds on the original Tank Pad's projector concept and refines it considerably. Where the first Tank Pad offered a dim 100-lumen DLP unit running at sub-HD resolution, the Ultra steps up to 260 lumens and native 1920x1080 output. That is a 2.6x improvement in brightness in one generation, and it matters enormously in practice.
The hardware underneath is a MediaTek Dimensity 8200 paired with 16GB of LPDDR5 RAM and 512GB of storage. This is not the fastest platform available in 2026, but it is more than sufficient for field work, document management, and media playback. Android 15 ships out of the box, which is a refreshing improvement over the Android 14 found on many rivals.
The camera cluster is genuinely impressive for a rugged device. A Sony IMX766 50MP main sensor sits alongside a 64MP night-vision camera using an OmniVision OV64B sensor backed by four infrared LEDs. The 32MP front camera uses a Sony IMX616. This is a meaningful step beyond the dual-camera arrangements on most competing rugged tablets.
Battery capacity is the headline stat: 23,400mAh. 8849 claims this is 11% larger than its predecessor. Charging speed is 66W, which is serviceable but falls well short of the 120W found on the recently launched Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra. At that battery capacity, 66W takes over two hours to fully recharge.
The body measures 268.3 x 170.3 x 24mm and weighs 1.345kg. It is a heavy device, though it sits below the Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra's 1.6kg. The integrated handle doubles as a kickstand and is the most practical design element here for outdoor projection use.
IP68 and IP69K certification allows for both submersion and high-pressure water jets. That is the expected baseline for a device at this price and positioning. A 4-metre laser rangefinder and an 800-lumen camping light round out the utility toolkit.
In the annals of tablets that came with a projector, this is clearly one of the best rugged tablets so far.
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)8849 TANK Pad Ultra: price and availabilityThe Tank Pad Ultra is available in a range of territories and regions via the official 8849tech website here.
At $689.99, this rugged tablet is priced way below the Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra, which commands closer to $799. It sits significantly above the original Tank Pad's sub-$400 positioning. The price increase reflects genuine hardware improvements rather than marketing inflation, particularly in the projector and camera departments.
UK pricing is £525.84 and in the EU its €604.79. There is a summer sale for US, EU, UK and CA customers with a further $20 reduction until the 12th of June.
Currently, this machine isn't on Amazon.com, but given that everything else 8849-branded is, it's probably only a matter of time before it is. The hardware is also sold by AliExpress, but it was more expensive than buying it directly for whatever reason.
Given the specification, even if the TANK Pad Ultra isn't exactly cheap, it offers the best value for a tablet with a projector.
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)Item
Spec
CPU:
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
GPU:
ARM Mali-G610 MC6
NPU:
MediaTek APU 580
RAM:
16GB LPDDR5
Storage:
512GB UFS 3.1 + dedicated microSD slot (up to 2TB)
Screen:
10.95-inch IPS LCD
Resolution:
1200 x 1920 (FHD+) pixels
SIM:
2x Nano SIM + TF (SD-XC)
Weight:
1345 g
Dimensions:
268.3 × 170.3 × 23.6 mm
Rugged Spec:
IP68 & IP69K rugged (water/dust/shock resistant)
Rear cameras:
50MP Sony IMX766 (primary) + 64MP OmniVision OV64B (night vision, 4x IR LEDs)
Front camera:
32 MP (Sony IMX616, fixed focus)
Networking:
5G NR, dual-band Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.3, NFC, FM radio, USB-C (OTG), 3.5mm headphone jack
Projector:
DLP, 260 lumens, 1920x1080, autofocus, 0.5-4m
Torch/Lamp:
800-lumen camping light, dual warning lights (red/blue) with sound simulation
OS:
Android 15
Biometrics:
Side-mounted fingerprint sensor
Battery:
23400 mAh (66W wired, 10W reverse charge)
Colours:
Black
8849 TANK Pad Ultra: designOn paper, the Tank Pad Ultra follows the established formula for rugged tablets. The body is thick and reinforced, with corner bumpers and rubberised edges. At 24mm deep it is not a device that slips into a jacket pocket unless you’re a friendly giant. The intention is clear: this is business equipment, not a lifestyle accessory.
The integrated handle on the rear is a practical touch. It locks flat against the body for carrying and swings out to serve as a kickstand for projection or media use. For a device this heavy, the handle is not an option, it is a functional necessity.
Which is why I was annoyed when I couldn’t get the one that came with my tablet to fit correctly. The stand is metal and is pinned to the TANK Pad Ultra by a single large bolt that has a straight slot that a ‘8849 coin’ is provided to tighten. On mine, it would never tighten enough to fully engage the stand, making it loose.
Initially, I thought this was because of an excessive amount of blue thread-locker on the bolt, but after I’d scraped that off and realised it didn’t fix the problem, I concluded the thread in the tablet was poorly manufactured.
I didn’t have the thread cutter to fix this handy, so I filed the bolt down a little to make it extend less, and it fitted much better. Not sure why 8849 quality assurance didn’t notice this, but they need to make sure that they do in the future.
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)One oddity about the stand is that it has a square profile that engages, allowing for four possible ways to attach it. Except that only one direction works properly, because the others interfere either with the camera cluster or the camping light. Perhaps a polariser is needed to help users put it on correctly?
The top edge houses the volume keys and two PPT buttons in roughly the middle of that side, with the projector mounted to the left. The power button with an integrated fingerprint scanner is on the left side, where I kept accidentally hitting it while trying to take photos.
I tried to set that button up with fingerprint unlock and failed miserably. When you enter the fingerprint training mode, it tells you to firmly press the button, and when you do, the tablet turns off. Thankfully, the face unlock works much better, so it’s hardly a deal breaker.
The SIM tray is on the lower edge, and the USB-C and audio jack ports are under a rubber plug on the right side.
What’s missing here is any pogo pin pads or extra USB port that could be used to connect the tablet to a vehicle cradle. Which, when you have a tablet that’s 1345 g, you would reasonably expect to exist. There isn’t one, which explains why the designers never considered supporting that functionality.
Overall, the layout of this tablet isn’t the best I’ve seen, but most people could probably adapt to it.
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)Design score: 3.5/5
8849 TANK Pad Ultra: hardwareThe Dimensity 8200 is a solid midrange to upper-midrange platform. Built on a 4nm process, it delivers capable performance for multitasking, Android gaming, and field software use. It is not the Dimensity 9000 series or a Snapdragon 8 Gen equivalent, and buyers with heavy sustained workloads should note the distinction. For the use cases this device targets, it is more than adequate and a step up from the Dimensity 7400X that Ulefone used in its most recent design.
For no logical reason, rugged tablet makers seem to think decent processors or camera sensors aren’t required, when they’re as critical as they are in phones.
Sixteen gigabytes of LPDDR5 RAM is generous. Combined with the expandable storage via microSD, the Tank Pad Ultra avoids the storage cliff that afflicts cheaper rugged tablets.
But it's the DLP projector that is the engineering centrepiece in this design. At 260 lumens, it is 2.6 times brighter than the original Tank Pad's 100-lumen unit. Auto-focus handles throw distances between 0.5 and 4 metres. A micro-ranging laser assists the focus calibration for precise image sharpness. The native output resolution of 1920x1080 is a substantial step up from the 854x480 of the original device, and better than the 960 x 540 projector on the Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra.
My only issue with the projector is that 8849 didn’t implement a low-throw solution where the tablet could be flat on a desk and still project an image on the wall. With this design, you need to use the stand or a pile of books to elevate the tablet to a height where the projection will work.
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)The 23,400mAh battery is enormous, even if some rugged tablets have even more. Runtime estimates in the field will depend heavily on whether the projector, camping light, and 5G radio are active simultaneously. With the projector running, expect significantly reduced endurance versus a typical standby or browsing scenario.
One last special feature of this tablet is the GPS solution. It uses dual frequencies L1+L5 GPS for more precise positioning, in theory. I've not seen this in a rugged tablet before, and it could be genuinely useful for those flying drones or doing surveys. In my testing, it did seem marginally more accurate than the GPS in a typical phone.
The 8849 Tank Pad Ultra has three cameras:
Rear cameras: 50MP Sony IMX766 , 64MP Omnivision OV64B1B Sensor (Night Vision)
Front camera: 32MP Sony IMX616
The camera configuration is one of the Tank Pad Ultra's stronger arguments over rivals. Most rugged tablets treat imaging as an afterthought. 8849 has invested meaningfully here.
The main camera uses a Sony IMX766 sensor at 50MP. This is the same sensor found in numerous premium Android smartphones, so expectations for image quality are reasonably well established. The large 1/1.56-inch format and all-pixel autofocus should deliver solid results in good light.
The night-vision camera is the headline differentiator. The 64MP OmniVision OV64B sensor is backed by four infrared LEDs and a dual-tone LED flash capable of 1.5A output. 8849 claims usable images in near-total darkness. This is genuinely useful for inspection work, security documentation, or field work in unlit environments.
The 32MP Sony IMX616 front camera is well specified for video calls and document scanning. For remote workers filing from a site office, the quality here matters more than it might for a consumer device.
Looking through my examples, the rear camera on this tablet produces some excellent results. The colour is accurate and not oversaturated, the edges of objects are crisp, and even the sky avoids being blown out. Using editing tools, it’s easy to get extra detail out of shadows and crop without making images appear blocky.
And, the 64MP Omnivision OV64B1B is one of the best choices for a night vision sensor, currently.
There are limited special photo modes, but you do get timelapse, super resolution, and QR codes, and there is a PRO mode. Video capture has scene modes and a full spectrum of resolutions from VGA up to 4K.
The only way this could get much better is if the optics had a proper zoom and not a digital one, but relatively few phones or tablets have that feature.
The only blot here is that 8849 wouldn’t pay for Widevine L1 encryption, so the best resolution you can stream from major providers is 480P, even if the screen would handle 1080p easily. Unfortunate, but a predictable limitation.
That point aside, this is one of the best camera solutions on a rugged tablet I’ve encountered, and for those doing surveys or wanting to capture property or vehicle damage, the provided tools are more than most will realistically need.
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)8849 TANK Pad Ultra Camera samplesMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceMark PickavanceTablet
8849 Tank Pad Ultra
UleFone Armor Pad 5 Ultra
SoC
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
MediaTek Dimensity 7400X
GPU
ARM Mali-G610 MC6
ARM Mali-G615 MC2
Mem
16GB/512GB
12GB/512GB
Weight
1345 g
1,600g
Battery Capacity
mAh
23,400
24,200
Geekbench
Single
1254
1047
Multi
3885
2900
OpenCL
4094
3022
Vulkan
4632
3046
PCMark
3.0 Score
15276
12199
Battery
30h 43m
28h 27 min
Charge 30
%
25%
27%
Passmark
Score
16894
13661
CPU
8413
6788
3DMark
Slingshot OGL
7711
6578
Slingshot Ex. OGL
Maxed
5477
Slingshot Ex. Vulkan
Maxed
5156
Wildlife
6280
3555
The Dimensity 8200 platform performs comfortably in daily use. Android 15 runs without the stuttering or lag that can affect less powerful rugged tablets. Multitasking between field apps, maps, and documents is smooth.
Gaming performance is functional rather than flagship. The Mali-G610 MC6 GPU handles lighter titles well. Sustained gaming or graphics-intensive applications will cause throttling, as is typical for this class of chip under prolonged load.
The projector introduces a notable power draw. Thermal management under combined projector and processing load is an area worth monitoring in extended field scenarios. The device body will warm noticeably during sustained projection.
If we compare the 8200 with the 7400X that the Ulefone tablet uses, this SoC is roughly 25% quicker across the board, and better than that in graphics performance.
However, with great performance comes even greater power consumption. And, while the battery life of the machine looks good at 30 hours and 43 minutes, there is a caveat that the Ulefone device still had 27% of its battery unused when the benchmark aborted. Where the 8849 machine only had 5%, therefore the win should go to the Ulefone.
That said, this is more than enough capacity for most uses, and if curated, a running time of more than five days is easily within reach.
For field engineers, survey teams, and outdoor professionals who project content regularly and need the clearest image possible from an integrated device, the Tank Pad Ultra earns a confident recommendation. For everyone else, the 8849 Tank Pad Ultra is the current high-water mark for built-in pico projection in a rugged tablet.
The leap from 100 lumens and 854x480 to 260 lumens and native 1080p is a generational step, not an incremental one. Add a Sony sensor main camera, a 64MP night-vision unit, a laser rangefinder, and a 23,400mAh battery at $690, and the value proposition is difficult to argue against.
The shortcomings are real but predictable. Sixty-six watts of charging is slow for a battery this large, even if it can manage a complete cycle in two hours. The device is heavy and thick by any standard other than the rugged-tablet category it occupies. The Dimensity 8200, while capable, is not a premium 2026 platform, even if it’s the exception to the rule that rugged tablets are typically underpowered.
Against the Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra, its most direct rival, the Tank Pad Ultra wins on projector brightness, projector resolution, SoC power, weight and price. It loses on charging speed and the dual-floodlight provision. Which device wins depends entirely on which compromises suit your workflow, and how tight your budget is.
Should I buy a 8849 TANK Pad Ultra?8849 TANK Pad Ultra Score CardAttributes
Notes
Rating
Value
Reasonable cost for an exceptional feature set
4/5
Design
Heavy and thick, with an awkward stand
3.5/5
Hardware
Modern SoC, lots of RAM and storage, and a bright projector
4.5/5
Camera
Decent sensor delivers good results
4/5
Performance
Powerful, power efficient and excellent battery life
4.5/5
Overall
Not cheap or light, but excellent value
4.5/5
Buy it if...You need a projector on a tablet
At 260 lumens with native 1080p output, nothing else in this class comes close.
You work in low light or complete darkness
If night-vision imaging is part of your workflow, then the 64MP infrared camera is a genuine professional tool for inspections, security, and low-light documentation.
Weight and portability are priorities
At 1.345kg and 24mm thick, this is field equipment rather than a general-purpose tablet.
Charging speed is critical
The 66W limit is slow for a battery this size. The opposition's 120W system is a substantial real-world advantage if you need to charge and go. View Deal
Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra
A 200-lumen DLP projector, 120W charging, heavier at 1.6kg, but with dual 1000-lumen floodlights and auto-keystone correction. The issue here is that this tablet is more expensive, while in other respects having a lower specification than the 8849 TANK Pad Ultra.
Read my full review of the Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra here.
For more ruggedized devices, we've reviewed the best rugged phones, the best rugged laptops and the best rugged hard drives
Size: 102.7 × 64.0 × 7.85 mm (excluding button height)
Weight: 96.0 g
Battery: 2100 mAh
Formats: Up to PCM 768 kHz/32 bit, DSD512 (USB-C)
Max Output @16.5 Ω: 180 mW (balanced)
The Khadas Tea Pro headphone amplifier is a slim and lightweight external DAC/amp that works across most devices — iOS, Android, Mac, Windows and Linux — and is particularly good for smartphones with MagSafe or magnetic cases.
The Tea Pro connects via USB-C and delivers both 4.4mm balanced and 3.5mm stereo outputs, with support for up to 768kHz PCM and DSD512 audio. It also has Bluetooth 5.4 input with aptX HD, aptX Adaptive and LDAC as well as the obligatory SBC and AAC. The integrated battery promises up to 8 hours of CD quality listening over USB-C and 11 hours using AAC on Bluetooth.
Although there's Bluetooth on board at up to 96kHz PCM, for best results you want to use this device as a wired DAC/amp. The Bluetooth performance isn't bad by any means, but the Tea Pro delivers higher resolution audio via USB-C.
FiiO TT13 review: price and release dateThe Khadas Tea Pro was launched in August 2025 with a recommended price tag of $199 / £199 (about AU$375) and is available with a choice of two cables: USB-C to USB-C, or Lightning to USB-C for older iPhones and iPads. Although it's twice the price of the original and well-received Tea it's a very significant upgrade with significantly higher sound quality, better Bluetooth, an integrated display and more headphone options.
Khadas Tea Pro review: featuresThe Tea Pro has both 4.4mm balanced and 3.5mm headphone outputs. (Image credit: Future)Although it's compatible with almost anything with a USB port, the Tea Pro is clearly intended for MagSafe iPhones (iPhone 12 onwards) or phones in magnetic cases. That enables it to clip securely to the back of your phone, and it's a strong connection both directly and through a compatible phone case.
There are two headphone jacks here: a 4.4mm balanced output delivering up to 180mW at 16.5 Ω, and a 3.5mm jack putting out up to 100mW at 16.5 Ω. There's also a built-in microphone for voice calling. If you have headphones with their own mic connected to the 3.5mm jack, the headphone mic will take precedence over the Tea Pro's mic.
The ESS ES9039Q2M DAC supports sample rates of up to 768kHz PCM and DSD512, with a signal to noise ratio of up to 122dB. A Qualcomm QCC5181 takes care of the wireless features, with support for SBC / AAC / aptX / aptX Adaptive / aptX HD / LDAC over Bluetooth 5.4.
There are seven EQ presets for different musical genres, and you can also set your own EQ via the 10-band custom EQ. That delivers adjustable gain from -12dB to +12dB.
The internal battery is 2,100mAh and promises up to 11 hours of listening depending on the audio format you're using: 11 hours with AAC over Bluetooth and 8 hours of CD audio over USB-C. The Tea Pro can also recharge from your phone when its battery is low if you enable Device Charging in its settings menu.
Features score: 5 / 5
Khadas Tea Pro review: sound quality Don't let that huge glass area fool you: the Tea Pro's display is tiny. (Image credit: Future)The Tea Pro delivers a neutral sound, and with high gain on it delivered an impressively propulsive performance on my open-back BeyerDynamics; I'd have liked to drive them a little louder but there's more than enough power for sensible listening levels. Bass is generally clear and well defined and highs are airy without being harsh, and things only started to get uncomfortable when both iPhone and Tea Pro were at their highest volume levels on very bright or bassy tracks.
As fun as the Tea Pro is over Bluetooth, it's better still with a USB-C connection. It's louder, more defined and more spacious, with the likes of Robyn's Dopamine delivering more punch than over wireless. There's a nice wide soundstage, with tracks like U2's remastered Zoo Station sounding suitably widescreen and Talk Talk's New Grass delivering impressive airiness.
The Tea Pro is very good for a portable DAC/amp, although I did notice a difference on tracks such as Little Simz and Obongjayar's Point and Kill that showed up the relative lack of headroom compared to a desktop device: on my desktop DAC/amp the serpentine bass is noticeably clearer and more distinct, the whole track feeling much more airy, whereas on the Tea Pro the low end was less defined and the track a little boxy. I found that the on-board EQ presets made that more apparent, dulling the sound. I much preferred leaving the EQ off altogether on my better headphones, although I did need to cut the highs for IEM listening to reduce the harshness they're prone to.
Sound quality: 4 / 5
Khadas Tea Pro review: designThe Tea Pro looks and feels expensive thanks to a mix of aluminum and black glass. (Image credit: Future)The Tea Pro is a good-looking thing. It looks decidedly Apple-esque, with a very slim 7.85mm machined aluminium casing, curved edges and two large black glass sections: the status display area, which looks big but contains a fairly small 0.95-inch AMOLED screen, and a smaller lozenge displaying the Tea logo. That lower lozenge is functional as well as decorative, as it ensures your phone won't wobble when you put it on a desktop or other flat surface.
Buttons are kept to a minimum. On the left there's a power button and a menu/confirm button, and on the right there are volume up and down controls. The slim size of the Tea Pro makes them a little fiddly to access when the device is attached to your phone, but not impossibly so. That's not an issue if you're connecting with the supplied 10cm USB-C cable.
Inevitably adding a magnetic item to your phone adds weight, but the Tea Pro isn't too bad: at 96g it's lighter than Apple's own similarly sized MagSafe power bank.
Design score: 4 / 5
Khadas Tea Pro review: ease of use and setupPairing over Bluetooth is effortless and the menu system is simple: it gives you access to filters, EQ, high and low gain options, device settings, headphone options and so on. The text is exceptionally small, however, so it's handy that you can also access settings via the companion iOS/Android app.
Usability and setup score: 4 / 5
Khadas Tea Pro review: valueIt's clear that some of the price tag here is for that aluminum body and extensive use of glass: rival headphone DAC/amps cost a lot less but look and feel a lot less special. If you're happy to pay a premium for solid build and stylish looks then this is a good choice with excellent iPhone attachment and good compatibility with other devices too.
Value score: 3 / 5
Should I buy the Khadas Tea Pro?Attributes
Notes
Rating
Features
Superb hi-res support and choice of cabled or wireless phone/device connections.
5/5
Design
Premium look and feel and solid magnetic attachment, but the screen text is microscopic.
4/5
Sound quality
Good on Bluetooth, better still on USB-C. Punchy, neutral and detailed sound.
4.5/5
Value
Good looks and solid build up the price; rivals can be a lot cheaper.
3/5
Buy it if...You're totally wired
The Tea Pro is a great, convenient and stylish way to run wired headphones or IEMs from your phone when you're out and about.
You've got an iPhone 12 or later
It's widely compatible but the Tea Pro was clearly designed with MagSafe iPhones in mind.
You appreciate good looks
Phone-focused DACs don't usually look or feel this premium.
You have high impedance headphones
The Tea Pro is fairly powerful but portability and battery considerations limit the available output power.
You're on a tight budget
Rival mobile DACs are much cheaper and sound pretty great.View Deal
You want a desktop DAC
The Tea Pro sounds pretty great but desktop DACs don't have to compromise to save power.View Deal
The cassette-themed FiiO KA15 is cute, fun, sounds good and comes in at half the price of the Tea Pro, delivering both 3.5mm and balanced 4.4mm outputs with a desktop mode that puts out much higher power than the Tea Pro can deliver. The iFi Go Link 2 is cheaper still and particularly good if all you want to do is add wired headphones to a USB-C device such as a phone or tablet.
How I tested the Khadas Tea ProI spent a week listening to the Tea Pro via my usual headphones: BeyerDynamic DT990 Pro open-back and DT770 closed-back headphones at home and work, and SoundMagic E11C IEMs outdoors and on public transport. I listened to lossy and lossless streaming and uncompressed FLACs on my iPhone 16 Pro.