Feed aggregator

Apple sometimes announces hardware at WWDC, so will we see iPads this year? And what about the new iPadOS?

OpenClaw exposes how autonomous AI agents are reshaping enterprise security risks..

Linux Foundation and WEF data both challenge job displacement concerns, revealing net job growth across Europe.

Siri will get an AI upgrade at Apple’s WWDC show today. Here’s how it could affect the Apple TV and HomePod mini.

Businesses misjudge what customers value, adding AI before fixing basic digital friction.

Beth and Rip have officially made a deal with the Devil that is Beulah Jackson. But when does Dutton Ranch episode 6 land on Paramount+?

Here’s how to watch Brexit: A Very British Civil War for *FREE*

Windows 11 search could soon get a vital change to make it more usable.

In the first papal address to the Spanish legislature, the American pope said a "moral renewal" was necessary in legislatures and public life to ensure respect for the inherent dignity of all people.

(Image credit: Yara Nardi/Reuters Pool via AP)

As the 2026 World Cup approaches, a new BBC One documentary sees former England manager Gareth Southgate take on the issues affecting young men.

Parallels Desktop is often included among the best virtual machine software options for users who need to run Windows on a Mac. Its main appeal is convenience. Rather than presenting virtualization as a technical task, Parallels tries to make Windows feel like part of the Mac environment, which is still its biggest advantage over more manual alternatives.

This matters more on Apple Silicon Macs, where running Windows is no longer as simple as installing the standard x86 version of the operating system. Parallels focuses on Windows 11 Arm, and it handles much of the setup process for the user. That makes it especially useful for people who need Windows-only apps but do not want to manage installation media, drivers, or configuration details manually.

The result is a tool that feels more consumer-friendly than most virtualization platforms. It is not the cheapest option, and it is not free from compatibility limits, but it remains one of the few products in this category that can make running Windows on a Mac feel normal rather than experimental.

Parallels: Plans and pricing

Parallels Desktop is a commercial product, and pricing remains one of its main drawbacks. The Standard edition starts at $99.99 per year, while the Pro edition starts at $119.99 per year and the Business edition at $149.99 per year. Enterprise pricing is handled separately through sales.

The Standard edition is aimed at home and personal users, with resource limits of 8GB of virtual RAM and 4 virtual CPUs. The Pro and Business editions expand this significantly, supporting up to 128GB of virtual RAM and 32 virtual CPUs, while also adding more advanced tools for development, automation, testing, and business deployment.

A one-time purchase option is available for Standard users who prefer not to subscribe. However, the one-time Standard license only covers the version purchased. Future major upgrades require an additional payment, which makes the subscription model more practical for users who want to stay current with annual macOS and Parallels updates.

This pricing structure matters more than it used to. VMware Fusion is now available for free, which puts Parallels under more pressure to justify its cost. The argument for Parallels is no longer simply that it is the most capable option, but that it saves time and provides a more polished experience.

For casual users, Standard may be enough, especially if the goal is to run office software, web apps, or a small number of Windows-only tools. Users who need more CPU cores, more memory, command-line tools, or advanced development features will need to look at Pro. That makes Parallels more flexible, but also more expensive over time.

In practice, Parallels is best seen as a productivity expense rather than a casual utility. If Windows is central to your workflow on a Mac, the price can be easier to justify. If you only need a virtual machine occasionally, free alternatives become much more attractive.

Parallels: Features

(Image credit: Parallels // Future)

Parallels Desktop provides a broad set of virtualization features, but its strongest features are the ones that reduce friction between Windows and macOS. Windows 11 installation is highly guided, and on Apple Silicon Macs the software is built around the Arm version of Windows, which is the most practical route for modern Mac hardware.

Coherence Mode remains one of the defining features. It allows Windows applications to appear alongside Mac apps without keeping the full Windows desktop in view. This makes Parallels feel less like a separate virtual machine and more like a compatibility layer for Windows software.

Integration goes further than display handling. Users can share folders, copy and paste between systems, drag files between Mac and Windows apps, and access Windows applications in ways that feel close to native macOS behavior. There are practical workflow benefits such as Spotlight access to Windows apps and files, and the ability to use Mac-side tools more naturally while working inside Windows.

Parallels also supports macOS and Linux virtual machines, although Windows remains the main reason most users buy it. More advanced editions add features aimed at developers and power users, including expanded CPU and memory allocation, command-line tools, and more control over virtual environments.

There are still limits. On Apple Silicon Macs, Windows runs as Windows 11 Arm. Many x86 Windows applications can work through Microsoft’s translation layer, but this is not the same as running every older Windows app natively. Parallels can also support x86 environments in some scenarios, but this is better treated as a specialist capability than a mainstream workflow.

Parallels: Interface and use

(Image credit: Parallels // Future)

Parallels Desktop is strongest when judged as a user experience rather than just a virtualization engine. The setup process is one of the easiest in the category, especially compared to UTM or VMware Fusion. Instead of requiring users to build a virtual machine manually, Parallels guides the process and handles much of the configuration automatically.

This is the area where Parallels justifies much of its price. The interface is clean, direct, and designed for Mac users who may not have a technical background. Common tasks such as launching Windows, resizing the VM, sharing folders, or switching view modes are easy to find and rarely require deep configuration.

Coherence Mode is also central to the experience. By hiding the Windows desktop and letting Windows apps sit directly on the Mac desktop, Parallels reduces the sense that the user is working between two separate systems. This is not essential for everyone, but for users who spend hours moving between macOS and Windows applications, it can make a major difference.

The experience is not perfect. Some advanced settings still require a basic understanding of virtualization, and accessibility feedback from real users suggests that setup and certain preferences can still be awkward in specific workflows. But compared to most competing tools, Parallels remains the most approachable option for everyday Mac users who need Windows.

Parallels: Performance

(Image credit: Parallels // Future)

In use, Parallels Desktop delivers strong performance for everyday Windows workloads, particularly on Apple Silicon Macs with enough memory. Office apps, browser-based tools, communication apps, and general productivity software are the areas where it feels most convincing.

On an M4 Mac Mini with 16GB of RAM, Windows was allocated four CPU cores and 8GB of memory, yet still handled large Excel files, Outlook, Chrome tabs, 2160p HDR video playback, and large spreadsheet operations smoothly. That is not a formal benchmark, but it supports the broader point that Parallels is well optimized for practical productivity work.

Recent reporting also suggests that Parallels can keep Windows 11 usable even on more limited Apple Silicon hardware for light productivity tasks. That does not mean every Mac is equally suited to virtualization. Running macOS and Windows at the same time places pressure on memory, and 8GB unified memory should be treated as workable for light use rather than ideal for sustained work.

For users who expect to run macOS and Windows side by side for extended periods, 16GB or more is a more realistic baseline. This becomes more important when using larger productivity apps, browser-heavy workflows, or Windows software that depends on translation layers rather than native Arm support.

Heavier workloads remain more complicated. CAD, 3D rendering, graphics-heavy Windows applications, and sustained multi-core workloads are better suited to higher-end Macs with more memory and stronger cooling. x86 translation also adds overhead, especially for older Windows software that has not been optimized for Arm.

Graphics support is useful but should not be overstated. Parallels supports DirectX 11 and OpenGL 4.1, which makes it suitable for some Windows applications and lighter games, but the lack of DirectX 12 support limits its usefulness for newer Windows games and graphics-heavy workloads. For productivity and compatibility, performance is strong. For demanding Windows gaming or professional 3D work, a dedicated Windows system remains the safer option.

Parallels: Support

Parallels benefits from a more structured support model than many free virtualization tools. Paid subscriptions include access to support channels, and the product is updated regularly to keep pace with macOS and Windows changes. This is particularly important on the Mac, where Apple platform updates can affect virtualization behavior quickly.

The company has also kept Parallels closely aligned with recent platform releases, including macOS Tahoe 26 and Windows 11 25H2. That level of update cadence is one of the reasons Parallels remains attractive for users who rely on Windows regularly and cannot afford long compatibility gaps.

Support is not the same for every user, though. Standard users and Pro users may have different expectations, and some real-user feedback still points to occasional issues around audio, accessibility, and settings behavior. For most mainstream users, support and documentation are good enough, but Parallels is not immune to friction.

Parallels: The competition

Parallels Desktop competes most directly with VMware Fusion and UTM. VMware Fusion is now the biggest pressure point because it is free, making Parallels’ subscription model harder to justify for users who only need occasional Windows access.

With VMware Fusion now available at no cost, Parallels has to justify its price through ease of use, integration, and ongoing Mac-focused updates rather than basic virtualization capability alone. That is still a strong argument for regular users, but it is less persuasive for technical users who are comfortable with more manual setup.

That said, Parallels remains easier to recommend for users who value convenience. VMware Fusion can run Windows on Mac, but setup and day-to-day workflow tend to feel less polished. UTM is also capable and free, but it requires more manual configuration and is less approachable for users who simply want Windows apps to work.

VirtualBox is less relevant on modern Apple Silicon Macs, especially for users who want a smooth Windows 11 experience. It remains important in the broader virtualization market, but Parallels operates in a more Mac-specific category where integration matters as much as raw virtualization capability.

In practice, Parallels remains the best option for Mac users who regularly depend on Windows software and want the least amount of friction. VMware Fusion and UTM are better value choices, especially for technical users, but Parallels still offers the most refined overall experience. Its main challenge is no longer capability, but whether that refinement is worth the price.

Parallels: Final Verdict

Parallels Desktop remains the most polished virtualization tool for Mac users who need regular access to Windows. Its biggest advantage is not simply that it can run another operating system, but how smoothly it integrates Windows into the macOS workflow. Setup is straightforward, Windows 11 can be installed with minimal effort, and features such as Coherence Mode, shared files, drag-and-drop, and Mac-style app access make the experience feel more refined than most alternatives.

That refinement comes with a cost. Parallels is no longer competing only against awkward or limited free tools, but also against VMware Fusion, which is now available at no cost. This makes the pricing harder to ignore, especially for users who only need occasional access to Windows.

For Mac users who rely on Windows apps regularly, Parallels still makes a strong case. It is fast, convenient, and highly integrated, but users with lighter needs may find that the price is harder to justify than before.

The World Cup is next week and if you're still deciding on a new TV, these 3 models are the top of my recommended list as TechRadar's TV tester

Stop the 'POC graveyard' by bridging the gap between ambitious A.I software and physical infrastructure.

It's a bumper month for mammoth builds, with giant sets from lands real and imagined.

Keir Starmer praises AI impact across the UK, but urges tech giants to do more to keep people safe.

This budget Bravia OLED is likely to be more affordable and will be available in lots of different sizes.

10GbE NAS that enable network video editing and ultra fast transfer speeds that far surpasses the competition.

The countdown to WWDC 2026 is on — follow along for the latest Siri, iOS 27, Apple Intelligence, and Apple rumor updates ahead of the big keynote.

Microsoft’s approach to virtualization combines two distinct tools under the same ecosystem. Hyper-V serves as the primary platform for running full virtual machines, while Windows Sandbox provides a lightweight, temporary environment for quick testing. Together, they are often considered among the best virtual machine software options, particularly for users who already rely on Windows as their primary platform.

Unlike standalone virtualization tools, Hyper-V is built directly into Windows, which shapes both its strengths and its limitations. It benefits from deep system integration and consistent performance, but it also follows a more technical, system-oriented design that can make it less approachable for new users. Sandbox, by contrast, focuses entirely on simplicity, offering a clean and disposable environment that launches quickly and resets after each session.

Microsoft Hyper-V / Sandbox: Plans and pricing

Hyper-V and Windows Sandbox are not sold as standalone products. Instead, they are included as optional features within Windows Pro, Enterprise, and Education editions.

For users already within the Microsoft ecosystem, this effectively makes them free to use. There are no separate licensing tiers or feature restrictions once the appropriate Windows edition is available. However, this also means that users on Windows Home do not have access to the full functionality without upgrading.

With competing tools such as VMware Workstation Pro now also available at no cost, Hyper-V’s value lies less in pricing and more in its native integration with Windows.

Support is handled through Microsoft’s broader support structure rather than a dedicated product channel. While documentation and community resources are extensive, direct support is typically tied to enterprise agreements rather than individual use.

Microsoft Hyper-V / Sandbox: Features

(Image credit: Microsoft // Future)

Hyper-V provides a comprehensive set of virtualization features suited for both development and enterprise scenarios. It supports a wide range of guest operating systems and allows detailed allocation of CPU, memory, and storage resources across multiple virtual machines.

Core functionality includes checkpoints, virtual networking, and the ability to run multiple environments simultaneously. These features make it suitable for testing, development, and structured lab environments where repeatability and isolation are important.

The platform also benefits from its integration with the wider Windows ecosystem. Tools such as PowerShell and Windows Admin Center extend its capabilities, allowing more advanced configuration and automation for users who need greater control.

More recent developments have expanded its flexibility further, including GPU Partitioning (GPU-P), which allows virtual machines to share the host’s graphics resources more efficiently. While this is primarily aimed at professional workloads, it reflects a broader shift toward more demanding use cases.

Windows Sandbox takes a different approach. It provides a minimal, disposable environment that launches quickly and runs a clean instance of Windows. Any changes made within the Sandbox are discarded once it is closed, making it particularly useful for testing unknown applications or files without affecting the host system.

Microsoft Hyper-V / Sandbox: Interface and use

(Image credit: Microsoft // Future)

Hyper-V Manager presents a structured but dated interface, with a layout that prioritizes functionality over usability. Virtual machines are managed through a central console, with configuration options exposed through menus that reflect the platform’s administrative origins.

Creating a virtual machine involves a guided process, but it still requires familiarity with concepts such as virtual switches and resource allocation. Compared to more modern tools, the workflow can feel less intuitive, especially for first-time users.

Networking is one of the more demanding aspects. Basic connectivity is handled automatically through the Default Switch, while more advanced configurations still require manual setup and a clearer understanding of how virtual networking works.

Windows Sandbox, on the other hand, is intentionally simple. It launches as a clean desktop environment within seconds and requires little to no configuration. Files can be tested quickly and safely, then discarded when the session ends.

This contrast defines the overall experience. Hyper-V focuses on control and flexibility, while Sandbox is built for speed and convenience.

Microsoft Hyper-V / Sandbox: Performance

(Image credit: Microsoft // Future)

In use, Hyper-V delivers stable and efficient performance across a range of typical workloads. Virtual machines start quickly and remain responsive, particularly when running standard operating systems such as Windows or common Linux distributions. Everyday tasks such as software testing, browsing, and light development work run smoothly on adequately provisioned systems.

Because it is integrated into Windows, resource handling tends to be consistent. Multiple virtual machines can run in parallel without major instability, provided that system resources are properly allocated. Performance scaling is predictable, with slowdowns appearing gradually under load rather than as sudden drops.

This becomes more apparent in multi-VM scenarios. Running several environments at once remains manageable, making Hyper-V a practical choice for development workflows that rely on parallel systems. While it may not always feel as responsive as more polished alternatives in short bursts, it maintains stability over longer sessions.

Disk and memory behavior are generally reliable, although not optimized for peak speed. In I/O-intensive scenarios, such as working with large virtual disks, it can feel slightly heavier than some competing tools. However, it avoids the inconsistent performance fluctuations sometimes seen in lighter virtualization platforms.

Long-term stability is one of its stronger points. Virtual machines remain usable over extended sessions, and overall system behavior stays consistent. This makes Hyper-V well suited to users who rely on persistent environments rather than short, isolated tasks.

Windows Sandbox follows a different performance profile. It launches quickly and runs smoothly for short testing sessions, benefiting from its lightweight and disposable design. Because it relies on a shared system image, startup times are significantly shorter than those of a full virtual machine. However, it is not intended for sustained workloads or complex configurations.

On Windows 11, storing virtual disks on a Dev Drive (ReFS) can improve I/O performance in development-heavy workflows.

Microsoft Hyper-V / Sandbox: Support

Hyper-V benefits from extensive documentation and a large user base, particularly in enterprise environments. Guidance is widely available through official documentation, community forums, and third-party resources.

However, support is not structured as a standalone product offering. Direct assistance is typically tied to broader Microsoft support agreements, which may limit accessibility for individual users compared to commercial virtualization platforms with dedicated support channels.

Microsoft Hyper-V / Sandbox: The competition

Hyper-V operates in a competitive space that includes both free and commercial virtualization tools.

Oracle VM VirtualBox remains the most accessible free alternative, offering cross-platform support and a simpler setup process, though with less consistency in performance.

VMware Workstation Pro provides a more polished experience, with a clearer interface and smoother day-to-day usability. It is generally easier to manage, even if Hyper-V offers tighter integration within Windows.

On macOS, Parallels Desktop stands out for its seamless integration and ease of use, targeting a different audience but highlighting the importance of user experience in this category.

Hyper-V’s strength lies in its stability and tight Windows integration rather than its interface. It is best suited to users who prioritize control and long-term reliability within a Windows environment.

Microsoft Hyper-V / Sandbox: Final Verdict

Microsoft Hyper-V is a capable and deeply integrated virtualization platform that delivers consistent performance and a wide range of features, particularly for users already working within the Windows ecosystem. Its enterprise background is evident in both its capabilities and its interface, which prioritizes control over ease of use.

Windows Sandbox complements this approach by providing a fast, disposable environment for safely testing files and applications without long-term setup. It is one of the simplest ways to isolate potentially risky software, even if its functionality is intentionally limited.

Taken together, Hyper-V and Sandbox offer a practical and reliable solution. They excel in stability and integration, but fall short of the polish and accessibility found in more user-focused virtualization tools.

For remote workers and IT professionals juggling multiple devices, this VPN deal is worth a serious look.

The post ExpressVPN Is on Sale for $40: A Great Deal for Remote Teams appeared first on TechRepublic.