Feed aggregator

Final D7000: Two-minute review

It goes without saying that $3499 / £2999 / AU$5899 is an awful lot of money to consider spending on a pair of wired over-ear headphones – and yet you’re almost spoiled for choice here, as our best wired headphones guide proves. What sets the D7000 apart, though, is that Final Audio has gone to town where the technology of planar magnetic headphones is concerned, and consequently has a pretty compelling story to tell.

It’s developed something it calls an ‘air film damping system’ to overcome the low-frequency limitations of the planar magnetic driver technology. It’s created a ‘pinna-aligned diffuser’ to overcome the variations in the shape of the human ear. It’s gone so far as to build its own manufacturing and assembly jigs in order to keep the entire construction process in-house and under its control. It's not a stretch to say that Final's need to get the science of bringing sound to your ears just right borders on obsessive.

The D7000 is far from the most cooperative headphone this sort of money can buy, so you’ll need to spend more – on a headphone amplifier with a fair bit of grunt. But if you’re able to drive the D7000 effectively, there’s a lot to enjoy about the sound. 

Yes, the case is huge (Image credit: Future) Final D7000 review: Price & release date

• Released February 27, 2024 
• Priced $3499 / £2999 / AU$5899

The Final Audio D7000 are available to buy now, and have been since the end of February 2024. A price of $3499 / £2999 / AU$5899 lets you know the company is not messing around with this model, and it also lets you know that alternatives from the likes of Focal (see the May-launch Azurys), Grado (see our Grado Hemp review) and Meze Audio (that would be the Meze Audio Liric) are firmly in Final Audio’s sights.

(Image credit: Future) Final D7000 review: Specs

(Image credit: Future) Final D7000 review: Features

• ‘Pinna-Aligned Diffuser’ 
• ‘Air Film Damping System’ 
• Not the easiest headphones to drive

Wired headphones seldom bristle with features – and the Final Audio D7000 are no different in that they have what they need to get the job done and nothing else. But it’s fair to say that Final Audio has applied itself to these features rigorously.

For instance, the company has addressed the inherent problems planar magnetic drivers have in producing properly low frequencies by developing something it calls an ‘Air Film Damping System’. If you play at significant volume, the movement of the diaphragm when it’s delivering bass information can be exaggerated to the point that it contacts the magnets that are driving it – which obviously is undesirable. Final Audio suggests that a) every other planar magnetic design consequently doesn’t dig as deep into the frequency range as is ideal, and b) it has solved the issue. 

A necessarily complicated system involving perforated metal shields suspended on either side of the diaphragm creates a layer of air between the diaphragm and its magnets - it acts as a braking system and allows the diaphragm to generate the desired low frequencies without the danger of contact with the magnets around it. The diaphragm itself is thin and light even by prevailing standards, and has a super-thin spiral-pattern aluminum coil etched onto it.

The other major feature here is the ‘Pinna-Aligned Diffuser’. The concept of acoustic adjustment via diffusion has been gaining traction for some time – but Final Audio feels it has identified, and subsequently solved, an important issue: the shape of the wearer’s pinna. The pinna (the shape of the outer ear) obviously varies widely from person to person, and it can significantly affect a headphone listening experience. Final Audio’s listening tests, using both real live ears and simulations, have resulted in a diffuser shape that is, according to the company, optimal for every listener regardless of the shape of their pinna. 

The driver arrangement has resulted in a headphone with an impedance of 50Ω and sensitivity of 89dB/mW – this translates to ‘quite difficult to drive’. It seems likely that anyone spending the thick end of three grand on a pair of headphones is not going to connect them directly to a laptop headphone socket or something like that – but equally, these numbers suggest a sturdy headphone amp will be a necessity.

The amount of oomph that’s likely to be required to drive the D7000 makes the supplied cable seem slightly odd. It’s three meters long, for starters, which is far from the most practical length, and is terminated in an unbalanced 6.3mm jack – which is not the most helpful (or premium) option. At this sort of money it’s not unreasonable to expect a variety of cables, in a variety of lengths, with a variety of terminations – a 4.4mm balanced jack, for instance, would help the headphone amp into which it’s plugged deal with the rather tricky load the D7000 present.

• Features score: 4.5/5

(Image credit: Future) Final D7000 review: Sound quality

• Tremendous powers of insight and analysis 
• Open, organized and utterly believable sound 
• Could quite easily be more dynamic

In many ways, the sound the Final Audio D7000 make is approaching ideal – or, at least, it is for someone with similar sonic priorities to mine. If you admire high detail levels, nicely neutral tonality, a beautifully balanced frequency response and a big, well-organized soundstage, then we have something in common. And you’ll no doubt enjoy the D7000 as much as I do.

A big 24bit/96kHz FLAC file of Weyes Blood’s Grapevine is exactly the sort of thing the Final Audio excel at dealing with. Their carefully judged tonality gives a touch of warmth to the acoustic instruments and the staggeringly direct and informative midrange, and their response from the bottom of the frequency range to the top is impressively even. The hard work Final Audio has done in an effort to liberate dynamic driver-type levels of bass extension and substance from the planar magnetic arrangement has without doubt paid off; the D7000 dig respectably deep and hit with determination. They may not be the punchiest headphones this sort of money can buy, but they’re certainly no slouches.

The top of the frequency range is open and airy, but more than enough substance to avoid sounding in any way thin  or hard. And with the impeccable vocal, they demonstrate real midrange fidelity and positivity – there’s an enormous amount of detail, both broad and fine, extracted and contextualized. The D7000 communicate through the midrange in the most eloquent and expressive manner, and singers sound direct and characterful as a result.

(Image credit: Future)

The soundstage these headphones can generate is extremely wide and respectively deep, so even a recording as relatively complex as Stevie Wonder’s He’s Misstra Know-It-All (as a DSD64 file) sounds organized and coherent – even the layout of the drum kit is absolutely explicit. And this recording demonstrates that what the D7000 lack in outright low-frequency impact, they make up for in control – rhythmic expression is always convincing.

Up to this point, the Final Audio combine analysis with entertainment in a most agreeable manner. They’re fun to listen to, musical in their approach, and have so many pertinent observations to make about the minutiae of recordings that each listen is a little voyage of discovery.

The only significant drawback is a relative lack of dynamism. While they’re very attentive to the low-key dynamics of harmonic variation, the D7000 aren’t all that inclined to really lean in when the going gets intense or big shifts in volume occur. That’s not much of an issue with the recordings I’ve mentioned so far, because they both offer very polite increases in attack – but when you ask the Final Audio to deliver something along the lines of My Bloody Valentine’s Feed Me With Your Kiss as a 24bit/96kHz FLAC file, they can sound slightly undemonstrative. The D7000 are either unwilling or unable to properly track the variations in intensity with proper determination, and they are slightly short of the sort of headroom that allow significant distance between the quietest and loudest moments in the recording.

• Sound quality score: 4/5

(Image credit: Future) Final D7000 review: Design

• 437g 
• Washi’ fabric for headband and earpads 
• Aluminum/magnesium alloy housing

‘Big’ seems as good a word as any to start with. The Final Audio D7000 aren’t outrageously heavy at 437g, they stay comfortable through long listening sessions thanks to the materials used in their construction and their careful hanger arrangement… but they nevertheless feel big because, well, they are. Or, at least, their earcups and earpads are. If you’re blessed with a smaller-than-average head, there’s a good chance the D7000 will prove to be rather more headphone than you’re comfortable with.

Final Audio has designed the D7000 to be as repairable and serviceable as possible and that is to be commended. Those tiny exposed screw-heads tell their own story – almost every part of these headphones can be removed if required. So hardware upgrades are possible, as is replacement or repair. In other words, the D7000 should last you a very long time. This is just one advantage derived from Final Audio’s insistence on conducting the entire manufacturing process in-house – even to the point that it’s designed and built its own assembly jigs and measurement jigs in order to ensure the quality of build and finish is exactly how it wants it to be.

The earcup housings are made from machined aluminum/magnesium alloy, which helps keep weight down, and they feel just as good as they look (as long as you’re fine with black – it’s the only option where finish is concerned). They adjust on the headband using a fairly rudimentary ‘friction pole’ arrangement, but that does at least mean the arms don’t flare out from the side of the weather’s head all that far. 

Final Audio has used a light, breathable fabric for the covering of the headband and earpads. It’s derived from ‘washi’, a traditional Japanese paper – and as well as offering good moisture control, lightness of build and excellent durability, we will all be pleased to learn it also has excellent anti-bacterial and odor eliminating properties.

• Design score: 4/5

(Image credit: Future) Final D7000 review: Value

• Well built; exceptional attention to materials used
• Requires good amplification – and expensive regardless

If you’ve read this far then you know the D7000 are very well built and finished, using high-quality materials. You’ll know they use some quite innovative technologies in order to do their thing, and you’ll know their modular construction should mean they last for years. You’ll know that in pretty much every respect except dynamic response, they’re a profoundly enjoyable listen – as long as you have amplification capable of driving them efficiently. And you’ll also know they’re by no means your only choice if you want to spend big on some new headphones…

• Value score: 4/5

(Image credit: Future) Should I buy the Final D7000? Buy them if... Don't buy them if...

(Image credit: Future) Final D7000 review: Also consider

Focal Stellia
Focal's stunning – and we mean that visually as well as aurally – over-ears have been sitting pretty among the audiophile-grade elite for a few years now. Think high-quality craftsmanship with a stunning open presentation that leads to mind-blowingly good sound. Yes, that $3,000 price tag could be a tad excessive, but if you've got Final Audio money, you've got Focal money…
See our Focal Stellia review for the full story

How I tested the Final D7000

• Connected to an iFi iDSD Diablo 2 headphone amplifier 
• With a variety of digital audio file types and sizes
• For well over a working week

My reference amplifier (a Naim Uniti Star) has a 3.5mm headphone socket – and so all my testing was done using a (hugely capable) iFi iDSD Diablo 2 headphone amplifier connected via UBS-C to an Apple MacBook Pro loaded with Colibri software in order to play proper high-resolution content. I listened to less information-rich stuff too, of course, and to music of every style and genre. And I did this for well over a working week, because frankly it was no kind of hardship at all…  

• First reviewed: August 2024
• Read more about how we test

A call for a general strike in Israel to protest the failure to return hostages held in Gaza led to closures and other disruptions, but it was ignored in some areas, reflecting political divisions.

(Image credit: Ohad Zwigenberg)

It's getting harder to spot by the day, but here are some ways you can use ChatGPT to spot student papers using ChatGPT.

In the summer of 1944, as American and Allied soldiers celebrated the liberation of France from the Nazis, one French family experienced a trauma that would be felt for generations. A murder and sexual assault so traumatic they are only now coming to terms with it, 80 years later. And this wasn't an isolated incident. We hear their story.

Wherever you look in the digital world, you can’t escape from the appeal of PDF, and a good thing too in our opinion: it’s a format that preserves the layout of a document no matter which device it’s being read on. 

Having reviewed all the best PDF editors and even tried the best free PDF editors to see how they measure up, we decided to give Xodo a go. How does this desktop, mobile, and online PDF editor compare? We put it to the test.  

Xodo: Pricing & plans

• 4 different subscription services, with 2 simple prices. Xodo’s aim is clearly to make it as easy as possible to welcome you into the fold - and the free option doesn’t hurt

Xodo comes in multiple flavours, depending on where you’ll be using the service the most. There’s Xodo Mobile, designed for Android and iOS devices. It allows you to convert files, redact and optimise them, and includes annotation tools and OCR capabilities.

Xodo Web is an online service, designed to be accessed via your web browser. It possesses additional tools (over 30 according to the pamphlet), including an AI-based summariser.

Xodo PDF Solution is software for your Mac, PC or Linux system. The number of tools increases to 60.

Each of these cost the same on their own: under $10 a month on a yearly contract, or $13 when you pay on a month by month basis. If all of them appeal, you can get the Xodo Document Suite instead, for $15 a month for a year, or $20 monthly.

If you’re still undecided, you can also explore Xodo for free. For the purposes of this review, we’ll be looking at the online solution, which you can check out by clicking here. 

• Pricing & plans: 4/5

Xodo: Tools

You’ll find Xodo’s tools are well-organized, making it easy to select the one you need (Image credit: Apryse)

• All the tools at the heart of Xodo are easy to access, and well-organized.

Unlike many PDF software we’ve tested, Xodo is very welcoming to new potential customers, letting you explore numerous tools and features for free, without you even having to create a free account with them. Point your web browser towards xodo.com, click on the big dark blue ‘Explore All Tools’ button, and off we go.

This leads you to a page showcasing every tool the online service offers (these can also be accessed via Xodo.com’s menubar, under the ‘Tools’ menu).

You’ll find most are designed for specific jobs. The first ones on the list for instance, focus on editing your files, be it to add text boxes, images, or annotating work, redacting sections of it, cropping and compressing, and more. Essentially if you’re used to this type of service, these tools won’t surprise you. Also included is the ability to edit Microsoft Word .docx documents.

Next comes conversion tools, either from PDF to another format, and vice versa (Mac users don’t need the latter as that capability has been baked into the operating system since Mac OS X). There are also tools to reorder pages, as well as merge and split PDFs. It’s all very well setup and organized, making it easy for you to choose the exact feature you need at any time.

• Tools: 4/5

Xodo: User experience

One tool for one function… easy to use, but more versatility would be preferable (Image credit: Apryse)

• Xodo offers you many tools, but we feel it would be more workflow-efficient if more tools were combined so you could perform many different actions in one go.

The tools available range from the simple, such as reordering pages in a document, to the complex, such as altering the very content of a document. Now some tools focus exclusively on what they’re supposed to do. For instance, select the Delete Pages tool, upload your document, and all you’ll be able to do is choose which pages to delete. Makes sense, right? It’s a simple concept but it does exactly what it says.

Except, wouldn’t it be great if not only could you delete a page, but also rotate another, and rearrange a couple more for instance? You may say, “this isn’t how this service works”, but you’d only be partially correct. The ‘Rearrange PDF’ tool, allows you to Rotate some pages as well. 

Some tools, like Extract, do allow versatility, letting you reorder and rotate pages (Image credit: Apryse)

In fact, the ‘Split PDF’ tool also allows you to rotate and rearrange pages, which really feels like this is how it should be: you’ve uploaded a document, so you should be able to perform as many actions as you’d like with it. The tools that allow this feel much more expansive, and you feel pretty restricted by the ones who don’t.

Should you need to do multiple actions to a document that can’t be done with a single tool, you’ll have to perform the first action, download the new changed file, and re-upload it, this time in the next tool, to carry on your work. It feels needlessly time consuming.

• User experience: 3.5/5

Xodo: Advanced tools

Redacting text is as easy as selecting it (Image credit: Apryse)

• Xodo has a string of powerful tools on offer which work well and are surprisingly easy to use - but most are paywalled or have limited-time trials.

By far the most powerful tools in Xodo’s arsenal are those in the Edit category. The ‘Redact’ tool for instance is incredibly simple to use: just select the parts you wish to remove, and Xodo will create a new file with those sections blacked out and un-selectable.

Even better is the 'PDF Editor' which allows you to add text boxes, highlights, annotations, the works - you’re offered numerous ways to write on a PDF, and you can go one further with the ‘Edit PDF Text’, which gives you the ability to alter the very fabric of the PDF, altering the words, changing the chosen font, resizing images, deleting sections, you name it, you can do it.

It's very simple to alter the content of a PDF file (Image credit: Apryse)

This is where you may well reach some limitations to the free trial: surprisingly, you can do a lot for free, from basic organisational work, to intense annotations. You’ll even be allowed to download the finished work for free. Until you can’t. You have a set number of actions you can perform. Exceed that allotment, and you’ll have to wait 7.5 hours before you can explore further… or start a subscription and carry on working faster.

More advanced tools, such as ‘Edit PDF Text’ let you perform changes but won’t allow you to download the finished product, while ‘Ask PDF’ (an AI-centric tool which lets you interact with the content of a file), needs a subscription to get started. Those limitations are perfectly understandable, as the aim is to get you as a customer after all. You are offered a 7-day free trial, but you’ll need to subscribe to take advantage of it (just don’t forget to cancel it before the end date, should you decide this service is not for you).

• Advanced tools: 4/5

Should I buy Xodo?

You can annotate documents in loads of different ways here (Image credit: Apryse)

Buy it if...

You need to work with PDF files, and perform numerous actions, all from one service, and all from any device you can log onto.

Don't buy it if...

Your needs can be covered by free software (such as Apple Preview), you don’t like working online, and you don’t like timed restrictions when trying to use the service for free.

For more productivity tools, we tested the best free PDF readers, the best PDF reader for Mac, and the best PDF readers on Android.

Russia launched a barrage of drones, cruise and ballistic missiles at Kyiv, Ukraine's air force said early Monday, sending residents into bomb shelters.

(Image credit: Vasilisa Stepanenko)

Russia launched a barrage of drones, cruise and ballistic missiles at Kyiv, Ukraine's air force said early Monday, sending residents into bomb shelters.

(Image credit: Yevhen Titov)

Dyson OnTrac: Two-minute review

Well, the Dyson Zone wasn’t an April Fool’s joke and the company best known for its vacuums was indeed dead serious about entering the audio market – because, lo and behold, we now have Dyson’s second pair of headphones. This time around, they go without the Bane-like air purification mask and, instead, focus solely on what’s important to a pair of headphones: sound quality. It also introduces a more accessible aesthetic in the process. 

Called the OnTrac, Dyson is now unequivocally aiming for a share of a crowded market currently occupied by some of the best headphones and best noise-cancelling headphones from more well-established brands.

The OnTrac’s spec sheet certainly implies Dyson is in with a fair shout. Music is delivered via custom 40mm neodymium drivers that are tilted 13˚ towards the ear, which allows your ear canal to suck up the waves as confidently as the maker’s iconic vacuums. ANC is onboard, which utlizes a custom algorithm to cancel up to 40dB worth of unwanted ambient noise and, in practice, it works very well indeed, with office chatter all but silenced and screaming babies on trains dulled to a whisper. It doesn’t quite reach the lofty heights of the best-in-class sets (Bose, I’m looking at you), but you can also do an awful lot worse.

Comfort is subjective. I have to agree that, despite the size and 451g weight of the OnTrac, it doesn’t feel like it when worn, thanks in no small part to Dyson’s rather clever move of attaching two small battery units to the headband (rather than the ear cups) for more even weight distribution. But the weight does become a little uncomfortable over prolonged periods (something I don’t experience with my daily pair of Sonos Ace cans). I do appreciate the fact that the OnTrac can be customized to a great degree thanks to interchangeable ear cushions and ear cups, plus the headband is available in four color finishes. It makes an already unique-looking set of headphones even more so.

On the sound quality front, the Dyson OnTrac delivers an overall presentation that is cleaner than I was initially expecting. Vocals, in particular are handled with poise and there is a discernible soundstage within which instruments are placed. While detail is also good, the OnTrac lacks dynamic punch and music can sound a little flat. It’s not an offensive or ‘bad’ listen by any means, but when competitors do sound better and for less money, it becomes tricky to recommend.

How much is the Dyson OnTrac I hear you ask? At $499 / £449.99 / AU$799, the OnTrac enters right near the top of the premium headphone market, and immediately gains the Apple AirPods Max and Bose QuietComfort Ultra as natural competitors. Sony’s WH-1000XM5 also gets a deserving mention here. These three pairs all represent some of the best wireless headphones currently available and all come from established brands. In the OnTrac, Dyson has to be rather optimistic, expecting potential customers to part with a big chunk of cash despite not having a lot of audio experience.

If you value having the option to customize your headphones, though, and you want something that is genuinely unique, the OnTrac should be at the top of your wishlist. And if Dyson can release a future firmware update that allows for greater customization of the EQ, it could be onto a genuine winner.

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge) Dyson OnTrac review: Price and release date

• Announced July 18, 2024
• List price of $499 / £449.99 / AU$799
• Additional cost for customizing ear cushions and ear cups

The Dyson OnTrac headphones were announced on July 18, 2024 and are now available to purchase outright directly from Dyson and select authorized retailers for $499 / £449.99 / AU$799. At this price, they sit at the upper end of the premium headphones market. The Apple AirPods Max are officially priced higher at $549 / £499/ AU$899 but can be picked up at a discounted price during big sale events, while the Bose QuietComfort Ultra – comfortably the best noise-cancelling headphones available right now – retail for $429 / £449 / AU$649 and, again, are often discounted.

If you want to customize your OnTrac headphones, ear cushions and outer caps are available for $49.99 / £49.99 / AU$79.99 a pair, although, at the time of writing, these are only available directly from Dyson.

For anyone else wanting to personalize their headphones, adding one pair of each soon adds up, so you’ll need deep pockets if you want to unleash the full potential of Dyson’s latest headphone effort.

Pricing the OnTrac so high definitely doesn’t work in its favor. It’s fair to say Dyson isn’t a ‘market leader’ when it comes to audio products, so to price its second pair of headphones much higher than five-star pairs from established audio brands is a bit delusional. Even if the OnTrac were brandished with a Sony or Bose logo, it would still be a tough sell. If the headphones were brought down to around the $400 / £400 / AU$600 mark, I think it would be a bit easier to be a little more positive about them.

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge) Dyson OnTrac review: Specs Dyson OnTrac review: Features

• Up to 55 hours battery life
• Good, not ‘best-in-class’, noise cancellation
• No wired listening or hi-res audio

One of the headline features of the Dyson OnTrac is its 55-hour battery life. It’s quite exceptional and eclipses much of its closest competition. The Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless (60 hours) and Cambridge Audio Melomania P100 (60 hours ANC on / 100 hours off) are similarly-priced pairs that do better, but nothing from Sony or Bose comes even close. Dyson includes a 1.2m braided USB-C cable in the box for the moment you do eventually run out of juice.

Alongside the exceptional battery life, Dyson is also keen to emphasise the capabilities of its noise-cancellation system. Eight mics are deployed in total across both ear cups to constantly listen to the world around you – 384,000 times a second, Dyson stresses – and cancel out external sound up to 40dB. This isn’t an adaptive noise-cancellation system, meaning it’s either ‘on’ or ‘off’, although there is a Transparency mode that lets in ambient sounds. This can be activated with a strong double tap on either ear cup. If you want to turn it off entirely, you’ll need to use the MyDyson app.

In real-world testing, the noise cancellation works incredibly well. Office chatter was canceled out entirely and screaming babies on public transport were reduced to near-silence. It’s certainly one of the better iterations of noise cancellation I’ve personally come across, although I would say the Bose QC Ultras do still claim the title of truly best in class.

Alongside being able to adjust noise cancellation, the MyDyson app is where you can (sort of) tailor the sound. There are three EQ presets to choose from: Enhanced (on by default), Bass Boost and Neutral. It would have been nice to be given the opportunity to fully personalize the EQ settings in a similar vein to what Bowers & Wilkins or Bang & Olufsen offer through their respective apps.

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)

The MyDyson app also displays a live sound exposure graph that constantly monitors noise levels both inside and outside the ear cups, clearly showing you whenever the levels become potentially harmful. It turns out I prefer to listen at a volume level that borders on ‘not recommended’. It doesn’t send you notifications when the audio you’re listening to encroaches into harmful territory, but you can toggle a setting that will ensure the volume doesn’t go above 80dB.

The Dyson OnTrac also features wear detection, meaning they’ll automatically play and pause when you put them on or off respectively, and it works with pinpoint accuracy. The headphones will also turn themselves off after 30 minutes of inactivity.

Elsewhere in regard to the feature set, the OnTrac falls a little short in comparison to the best at this level. Firstly, the Bluetooth 5.0 standard is used which is pushing seven years old and now lags behind Bluetooth 5.3. We’re also starting to see Bluetooth 5.4 show up in equally premium models. While it still serves up a reliable connection to source devices – I did experience the very occasional issue where the app didn’t immediately recognize the headphones were connected – it means some important features are missing, including multipoint connectivity for simultaneously connecting to two devices.

As far as audio codec support goes, the list is pretty short with just the basic SBC and AAC codecs alongside the rather niche LHDC. It’s a bit disappointing that a pair of headphones that cost as much as the Dyson OnTrac doesn’t support aptX in one form or another, or true high-resolution audio. There’s also no support for spatial audio or wired listening.

• Features score: 3.5/5

Dyson OnTrac review: Sound quality

• Clean and detailed
• Bass Boost increases the low end but delivers a pleasant soundstage
• Not the most dynamically adept

Despite their rather ‘in ya face’ looks, the Dyson OnTrac is a lot more delicate in its audio presentation. To earn its pay, Dyson places emphasis on the OnTrac’s ability to cater to a broad frequency range of 6Hz to 21kHz. That’s much lower – and a bit higher – than the human ear can hear, but Dyson says it made the decision to ensure the OnTrac could comfortably handle all sounds within the ear’s range of detection and to minimize distortion at higher volumes.

With the Neutral EQ preset selected, Dua Lipa’s Training Season bops along nicely in its opening verse with a decent helping of bass, and her vocal comes through crisp and cleanly. There is a good sense of space, with instruments and various other aspects of a track being clearly placed. But when compared to other pairs such as the Sonos Ace or the Bose QuietComfort Ultra, the sound delivered by the OnTrac feels more constrained with less room to breathe. It’s feels more like how on-ear headphones sound rather than over-ears, which the OnTrac technically is in the way they fit (I discuss this in the design section below).

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)

It certainly pays to play around with the EQ presets as I found what worked for one song didn’t necessarily work for the other. Training Season sounded fine on the Neutral preset, but Miley Cyrus’ Flowers was given an extra pop of energy when selecting Enhanced. On several occasions, Neutral flattens things to the point where it wasn’t all that engaging or fun.

And while the OnTrac could certainly keep up with the boogie rhythm of AC/DC’s Whole Lotta Rosie (I am reviewing these in Australia, after all), their lack of dynamic clout is exposed. It’s not to say there isn’t a change between the quieter intro vocal and louder burst of up tempo guitar, it just lacks a little bit of punch compared to some competitors. The Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless, for example, are just way more keen to rock out playing the same track. It’s as if they’re saying “alright, let’s do this!” compared to OnTrac's more reserved, “are you sure? You might damage your hearing” mentality.

It’s a similar story with Rammstein’s Los. Comparing the performance of the OnTrac against the Bose QuietComfort Ultra and there’s a noticeable difference in clarity. Till Lindeman’s vocal is far more pronounced when played through the Bose and, when the full band comes in at around 30 seconds, there’s greater depth. The OnTrac sounds more two dimensional in comparison. It’s good in the sense there’s decent drive behind the sound, but there are more competent performers that cost less money.

Bass heads will enjoy the Bass Boost EQ preset as it does certainly ramp up the low end, but it does muffle the overall sound somewhat. The pulsing bass rhythm throughout Planetary Assault System’s Desert Races benefitted far greater from the Enhanced preset instead.

Overall it’s not exactly a bad sound produced by the Dyson OnTrac. It’s clean and can unearth some detail, but their more neutral sound profile won’t be to everyone’s taste. An adjustable EQ could potentially help to some degree, and I hope this can be made available with a future firmware update, but with such a high-end price tag, it would be fair to expect a high-end sound straight out of the box.

• Sound quality score: 3.5/5

Dyson OnTrac review: Design

• Up to 2,000 color combinations
• Large ear cushions for noise isolation
• Can run hot

Dyson’s first foray into headphones was shockingly different to say the least, and while the OnTrac are far more headphone-y, they still deviate from the headphone norms of black, white and the occasional green or blue if a manufacturer is feeling adventurous.

The headband, which employs a modular-like design, is available in four different colors, and each comes with a default set of ear cushions and outer ear cups. Copper features navy-blue headband panels and copper ear cups; Black/Nickel has a black headband and shiny grey ear cups; Aluminum has a black headband, silver ear cups and yellow ear cushions; finally, Ceramic Cinnabar (the color of my review unit) features a coral-like orange headband and matching ear cups.

The headband colorway you choose is what you’ll live with, but the ear cushions and outer ear cups can be swapped out to any of seven choices for each, with a claimed total of 2,000 variations possible, paving the way for complete headphone personalization unlike anything I’ve seen before.

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)

Changing the cushions and cups isn’t difficult, as both come off with a slight twist. When you take the removable ear cups off, Dyson has added a nice little touch on the main ear cup by showing where each component can be found by way of a blueprint-style design.

The ear cups, despite being physically large, are actually incredibly slim and don't protrude much from the head. I previously thought the Sonos Ace were among the more aesthetically pleasing pairs of headphones in this sense, and so I have to give Dyson credit here.

The ear cushions are made from a microfiber material as opposed to the often used memory foam with a PU leather coating. It’s soft to touch and, indeed, soft when they’re on your head. But they’re not exactly what you would call breathable. Dyson has opted for the large cups and cushions to aid with passive noise isolation if you switch noise cancellation off, but also to increase the effectiveness when it’s turned on. But the size of the cushions and the material, combined with the fact they clamp onto your head tightly (which I do ultimately like as it instills confidence they won’t slip off) means things can get real hot real quick. I carried out most of my testing with the season coming into Australian spring and, after wearing them for a couple of hours, my ears were sweating despite the milder temperatures.

I also found I needed to wiggle the OnTrac around more than normal to get a comfortable fit so that the cutouts fully enveloped my ears. By comparison, the Sonos Ace, which I wear on a daily basis, slides right into place with no adjustments needed, making me think I was wearing headphones that felt more like on-ears than over-ears.

The ear cups themselves rotate so that they can be slid into the case and, in theory, you can wear them around your neck. But because they’re so large, it’s incredibly uncomfortable to do the latter.

Image 1 of 3

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)Image 2 of 3

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)Image 3 of 3

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)

There are two physical buttons on the OnTrac – one button for power and initiating Bluetooth pairing mode on the left ear cup and a small joystick on the right ear cup is used to adjust volume, skip tracks and play/pause. During my testing I found the joystick was responsive for the most part, although I occasionally had issues with adjusting the volume – it didn’t register me thumbing it up or down and I found you may have to give it a really good push. As mentioned earlier, a solid double tap on either ear cup will switch between noise cancellation and transparency modes and you'll get an audible feedback letting you know your command has been received.

The Dyson OnTrac comes supplied with a case (expectedly so, given the price) that has seemingly been inspired by the minimalist slip-case aesthetic employed for the AirPods Max, but offers a little bit more protection than Apple does. Think of a conventional headphone travel case, but remove the zipper sides so you’re left with just the front and back pieces. That’s what Dyson has done here, and attached them with a piece of elastic so when the OnTrac is out of its case it compresses down flat. 

The headphones slip back in without any trouble, but they’re exposed at both the top and the bottom, meaning they’re susceptible to dust ingress at the very least and the headband is left exposed for keys to scratch up against it when the case is in your bag. I love the intention of the fold-flat case, but the execution doesn’t quite nail it, and when you’re spending this much on a set of cans, you’re going to want to protect them as much as you can.

Image 1 of 3

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)Image 2 of 3

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)Image 3 of 3

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)

• Design score: 3/5

Dyson OnTrac review: Value

• Cheaper competitors offer better sound and more features
• Customization can get expensive

As I’ve already mentioned, the Dyson OnTrac costs an eye-watering $499 / £449.99 / AU$799. While that seems on brand for Dyson (everything the company makes is expensive), it would be easier to recommend the headphones if they cost a little less. After all, competing pairs of premium headphones have to be considered and, ultimately, the OnTrac falls short of what is now expected in this space. Battery life is fantastic and is a big gold star for Dyson, and the sound is certainly passable, but the fact is you can find greater sonic insight from others.

Hi-res audio support, or at the very least support for wired listening would have been nice to see, too. And, while I do think the ability to customize the headphones is an interesting and unique one, the added cost makes it much less of an impulse decision and I feel Dyson should throw in a bonus set of cushions and/or ear cups with the purchase of a pair of OnTrac headphones to justify the high price tag.

• Value score: 2/5

Should I buy the Dyson OnTrac? Buy it if...

You want a unique-looking pair of headphones

The ability to personalize the OnTrac headphones is a unique proposition and there’s no denying that they’re solidly built.

You need long battery life

While it’s not quite the class leader, the OnTrac’s 55 hours of battery life trumps much of the competition.

Don't buy it if...

You want best-in-class ANC

Noise cancellation is really very good, but if you want to block out everything from the world around you, Bose is still the option to go for.

You want an in-depth app

There’s no ability to fully adjust the EQ settings, and you’re instead given just three fixed presets. Some people may also miss the option to tailor the level of noise cancellation.

You listen in spatial audio

It might not be a dealbreaker for everyone, but given many other pairs in this space support some form of spatial audio, its omittance here is more noticeable.

Dyson OnTrac review: Also consider

Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones

It's going to take a lot to topple Bose from the top of the noise-cancellation headphone pack, although the Dyson OnTrac does come agonisingly close. These also add spatial audio and a more engaging sound, although the 24-hour battery life falls well short of Dyson's effort.

Read our full Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones review

Cambridge Audio Melomania P100

Class-leading 100 hours of battery life make Cambridge Audio's first pair of headphones the ones to get for frequent flyers. They deliver a glorious sound, too.

Read our in-depth Cambridge Audio Melomania P100 review

Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless

A more lively and detailed sound is what you'll get from these Sennheisers, along with slightly better battery life, improved connectivity and a more impressive feature set.

Read our full Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless review

How I tested the Dyson OnTrac

• Using iOS and Mac devices
• Using a variety of music genres
• In a variety of real-world scenarios

I used the Dyson OnTrac for a couple of weeks, listening to them at home, in the office and when commuting to work on loud, busy trains. I connected them to an iPhone 15 Pro and a MacBook Pro, and listened to a variety of music genres to determine if and how the EQ presets would affect them. During my two-week listening period, I never had to reach for the charging cable, owing to the OnTrac's incredible battery life.

Read more about how we test

[First reviewed September 2024]

Coco Gauff's loss in the U.S. Open's fourth round follows a third-round loss by defending men's champion Novak Djokovic, and was the latest in a series of early exits for Gauff in recent weeks.

(Image credit: Pamela Smith)

Here are some hints, and the answers, for the Sept. 2 Strands puzzle, No. 183.

Here are some hints — and the answers — for Connections No. 449 for Sept. 2.

Here are some hints and the answer for Wordle No. 1171 for Sept. 2.

Apple’s Mac mini might finally be getting a new design, but it could come at the cost of some compromises, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman in his Power On newsletter. According to him, the upcoming M4 Mac mini will likely be ditching USB-A ports in favor of a radically reduced chassis size. 

If the latest Mac mini M4 rumors are true, a few different versions of the little desktop PC are incoming, headlined by the M4 Pro variant which, by all accounts, could be the most premium Mac mini yet. Gurman says this model could ship as soon as October, and while you'll have to do without USB-A ports, it's still packing a whopping five USB-C ports as well as an ethernet port, HDMI port and headphone jack.

That's great for a device that's rumored to be very similarly-sized to an Apple TV, and you won't even have to carry around a separate power brick because, according to Gurman, it’s going to have its own internal power supply.

With the iPhone 16's unveiling coming soon, Gurman states that neither the M4 or M4 Pro Mac mini will be announced at the September 9 ‘It’s Glowtime’ Apple event, instead being unveiled at least a month later – so we won't know anything for sure until October at the earliest.

A worthy sacrifice?

It has been far too long since the Mac Mini's design has seen changes – the devices in our 2012 Apple Mac mini and Apple Mac mini (2023) reviews look nearly identical – as stated by Gurman, the last time we saw a proper Mac mini design refresh was almost 15 years ago.

While some users might think it's a shame to go without USB-A ports, we think it's more than worth it. If it's true that the M4 Mac mini will be the size of an Apple TV, that will make it half as small as the 2023 model – for context, an Apple TV's dimensions are 93 x 93 x 31 mm (3.66 x 3.66 x 1.2 inches) compared to the M2 Mac mini's 197 x 197 x 35.8 mm (7.75 x 7.75 x 1.41 inches).

Moreover, USB-C is now quite standard across devices, but docks and hubs are readily available, so you should still be fine if you're not ready to ditch your USB-A keyboard or mouse just yet. With the world now moving away from the old-school USB port, we wouldn't be surprised to see 2025's Mac Pro and Mac Studio go without, too.

You might also like...

• iPhone 16 Pro rumored features: the key upgrades we’re expecting
• Best business Mac and MacBook of 2024
• MacBook vs Windows: Which is the best laptop for students?

Amazon is offering up to 45% off smart lighting options from Enbrighten.

The birthplace of Dr. Pepper doesn't have the widest variety of broadband operators. Affordable, great speeds, or excellent availability, CNET's list of the best internet service providers in Waco helps you pick the best one for your needs.

If you've been looking for a video doorbell, you can nab this Belkin WeMo HomeKit doorbell for just $40 at Woot for a limited time.

Strands is the NYT's latest word game after the likes of Wordle, Spelling Bee and Connections – and it's great fun. It can be difficult, though, so read on for my Strands hints.

Want more word-based fun? Then check out my Wordle today, NYT Connections today and Quordle today pages for hints and answers for those games.

SPOILER WARNING: Information about NYT Strands today is below, so don't read on if you don't want to know the answers.

NYT Strands today (game #183) - hint #1 - today's theme What is the theme of today's NYT Strands?

• Today's NYT Strands theme is… Order in the court!

NYT Strands today (game #183) - hint #2 - clue words

Play any of these words to unlock the in-game hints system.

• COUNT
• STEAL
• SQUIB
• CHIN
• SHIN
• LANE

NYT Strands today (game #183) - hint #3 - spangram What is a hint for today's spangram?

• Lords and ladies

NYT Strands today (game #183) - hint #4 - spangram position What are two sides of the board that today's spangram touches?

First: right, 4th row

Last: left, 5th row

Right, the answers are below, so DO NOT SCROLL ANY FURTHER IF YOU DON'T WANT TO SEE THEM.

NYT Strands today (game #183) - the answers

(Image credit: New York Times)

The answers to today's Strands, game #183, are…

• ESQUIRE
• VISCOUNT
• KNIGHT
• QUEEN
• DUCHESS
• EARL
• BARON
• SPANGRAM: TITLES

• My rating: Easy
• My score: Perfect

I'm always pleased when I see a Q in a Strands puzzle. The letter is always followed by a U, obviously, which drastically reduces the words that can be made from it. Throw in the fact that very few letters can go before a Q either – it's basically vowels or S, occasionally an R – and these words are not usually hard to uncover.

There were two of them in today's Strands, ESQUIRE and QUEEN, and I found both with no problems early on. That confirmed the central theme of the puzzle, which the clue of 'Order in the court!' had not necessarily helped much with, and set me on the way to solving what was another fairly simple game.

How did you do today? Send me an email and let me know.

Yesterday's NYT Strands answers (Sunday 1 September, game #182)

• RICE
• AVOCADO
• SEAWEED
• MAYO
• CUCUMBER
• CRAB
• SPANGRAM: CALIFORNIAROLL

What is NYT Strands?

Strands is the NYT's new word game, following Wordle and Connections. It's now out of beta so is a fully fledged member of the NYT's games stable and can be played on the NYT Games site on desktop or mobile.

I've got a full guide to how to play NYT Strands, complete with tips for solving it, so check that out if you're struggling to beat it each day.

Quordle was one of the original Wordle alternatives and is still going strong now nearly 1,000 games later. It offers a genuine challenge, though, so read on if you need some Quordle hints today – or scroll down further for the answers.

Enjoy playing word games? You can also check out my Wordle today, NYT Connections today and NYT Strands today pages for hints and answers for those puzzles.

SPOILER WARNING: Information about Quordle today is below, so don't read on if you don't want to know the answers.

Quordle today (game #952) - hint #1 - Vowels How many different vowels are in Quordle today?

• The number of different vowels in Quordle today is 4*.

* Note that by vowel we mean the five standard vowels (A, E, I, O, U), not Y (which is sometimes counted as a vowel too).

Quordle today (game #952) - hint #2 - repeated letters Do any of today's Quordle answers contain repeated letters?

• The number of Quordle answers containing a repeated letter today is 0.

Quordle today (game #952) - hint #3 - uncommon letters Do the letters Q, Z, X or J appear in Quordle today?

• No. None of Q, Z, X or J appear among today's Quordle answers.

Quordle today (game #952) - hint #4 - starting letters (1) Do any of today's Quordle puzzles start with the same letter?

• The number of today's Quordle answers starting with the same letter is 0.

If you just want to know the answers at this stage, simply scroll down. If you're not ready yet then here's one more clue to make things a lot easier:

Quordle today (game #952) - hint #5 - starting letters (2) What letters do today's Quordle answers start with?

• H

• L

• P

• D

Right, the answers are below, so DO NOT SCROLL ANY FURTHER IF YOU DON'T WANT TO SEE THEM.

Quordle today (game #952) - the answers

(Image credit: Merriam-Webster)

The answers to today's Quordle, game #952, are…

• HABIT
• LODGE
• PLAIN
• DRIFT

This is about as straightforward as Quordle ever gets: four relatively common words, no unusual letters, no repeated letters, nothing really to worry about. You'll still want a strategy of some kind, of course – because no Quordle is ever easy as such – but if you do have one, you should have been fine today.

How did you do today? Send me an email and let me know.

Daily Sequence today (game #952) - the answers

(Image credit: Merriam-Webster)

The answers to today's Quordle Daily Sequence, game #952, are…

• PANIC
• LUNAR
• GOOSE
• SHEET

Quordle answers: The past 20

• Quordle #951, Sunday 1 September: RABBI, CRAWL, GUPPY, BRAND
• Quordle #950, Saturday 31 August: AWOKE, TIBIA, ITCHY, SNACK
• Quordle #949, Friday 30 August: ARISE, OLDER, ISSUE, ERUPT
• Quordle #948, Thursday 29 August: DECAY, DRUID, AVOID, KNEED
• Quordle #947, Wednesday 28 August: VIOLA, GONER, CAVIL, SHARE
• Quordle #946, Tuesday 27 August: ABYSS, DAILY, AGONY, MUSKY
• Quordle #945, Monday 26 August: NEVER, CHUNK, AUNTY, CROUP
• Quordle #944, Sunday 25 August: APTLY, LEVER, STORK, WIDOW
• Quordle #943, Saturday 24 August: EVENT, APNEA, SWATH, IRONY
• Quordle #942, Friday 23 August: LAUGH, SATYR, CACHE, CLONE
• Quordle #941, Thursday 22 August: BEARD, PAYER, BROWN, TRUCK
• Quordle #940, Wednesday 21 August: ALOFT, SNUCK, LAPSE, COMIC
• Quordle #939, Tuesday 20 August: CHIEF, SNORT, OUNCE, MILKY
• Quordle #938, Monday 19 August: GIVEN, STIFF, STOOL, ANTIC
• Quordle #937, Sunday 18 August: DEPTH, JUICY, GAWKY, INLAY
• Quordle #936, Saturday 17 August: HUMUS, FRONT, FUNNY, DRYLY
• Quordle #935, Friday 16 August: BRICK, CABLE, INBOX, FLOSS
• Quordle #934, Thursday 15 August: STINT, TRAIL, DECAL, BRAIN
• Quordle #933, Wednesday 14 August: TENOR, CLEFT, USHER, CREEP
• Quordle #932, Tuesday 13 August: LIMIT, AMBLE, ALBUM, BULLY

Good morning! Let's play Connections, the NYT's clever word game that challenges you to group answers in various categories. It can be tough, so read on if you need clues.

What should you do once you've finished? Why, play some more word games of course. I've also got daily Wordle hints and answers, Strands hints and answers and Quordle hints and answers articles if you need help for those too.

SPOILER WARNING: Information about NYT Connections today is below, so don't read on if you don't want to know the answers.

NYT Connections today (game #449) - today's words

(Image credit: New York Times)

Today's NYT Connections words are…

• RECORD
• STORE
• WEIRD
• REACTION
• STAMP
• STATION
• LETTER
• COMIC
• FUNNY
• MAIL
• COIN
• POST
• OFF
• POSITION
• CURIOUS
• JOB

NYT Connections today (game #449) - hint #1 - group hints

What are some clues for today's NYT Connections groups?

• Yellow: Strange
• Green: Role
• Blue: You might want lots of these
• Purple: [a thing that links] blank

Need more clues?

We're firmly in spoiler territory now, but read on if you want to know what the four theme answers are for today's NYT Connections puzzles…

NYT Connections today (game #449) - hint #2 - group answers

What are the answers for today's NYT Connections groups?

• YELLOW: PECULIAR
• GREEN: ASSIGNMENT
• BLUE: CLASSIC COLLECTION ITEMS
• PURPLE: CHAIN ___

Right, the answers are below, so DO NOT SCROLL ANY FURTHER IF YOU DON'T WANT TO SEE THEM.

NYT Connections today (game #449) - the answers

(Image credit: New York Times)

The answers to today's Connections, game #449, are…

• YELLOW: PECULIAR CURIOUS, FUNNY, OFF, WEIRD
• GREEN: ASSIGNMENT JOB, POSITION, POST, STATION
• BLUE: CLASSIC COLLECTION ITEMS COIN, COMIC, RECORD, STAMP
• PURPLE: CHAIN ___ LETTER, MAIL, REACTION, STORE

• My rating: Easy
• My score: 1 mistake

Hurrah! You can not believe the relief I felt on solving today's Connections. I'm sure not everyone reading this column does so every day, so you won't necessarily be aware (or care), but before today I'd failed four Connections in a row, and eight out of the previous 15 games. It was becoming a disaster. But this one is not so bad, and I'm back on track.

As is often the case, the key was in solving purple early on. This is usually the most difficult of the four groups, and often involves a 'blank' answer as it did here. There was a fair bit of misdirection in place, with POST and STAMP among the answers with LETTER and MAIL, but ruling out POST as part of the 'assignment' group (green) pulled me away from that angle, and pointed me towards the CHAIN __ connection. With purple solved, and with green and yellow not too tricky, I didn't need to worry about blue at all.

How did you do today? Send me an email and let me know.

Yesterday's NYT Connections answers (Sunday, 1 September, game #448)

• YELLOW: COOK IN A PAN BROWN, CHAR, GRILL, SEAR
• GREEN: PARTS OF THE EAR ANVIL, CANAL, DRUM, HAMMER
• BLUE: SHADES OF BLACK CHARCOAL, JET, RAVEN, SABLE
• PURPLE: WHERE YOU MIGHT FIND “A DRIVER” GOLF BAG, LIMOUSINE, MOVIE SET, TOOLBOX

What is NYT Connections?

NYT Connections is one of several increasingly popular word games made by the New York Times. It challenges you to find groups of four items that share something in common, and each group has a different difficulty level: green is easy, yellow a little harder, blue often quite tough and purple usually very difficult.

On the plus side, you don't technically need to solve the final one, as you'll be able to answer that one by a process of elimination. What's more, you can make up to four mistakes, which gives you a little bit of breathing room.

It's a little more involved than something like Wordle, however, and there are plenty of opportunities for the game to trip you up with tricks. For instance, watch out for homophones and other word games that could disguise the answers.

It's playable for free via the NYT Games site on desktop or mobile.