Feed aggregator

It's easier now to stay tuned in to video content, even if you can only listen, not watch.

s soft as she is..., 2023.'/>

Amy Sherald, Jeff Koons, Shepard Fairey and Rashid Johnson are among the visual artists who have donated works for an auction that will raise money for the Harris Victory Fund.

We asked an Italian chef about the eight biggest myths and misnomers linked to making pasta at home.

Enjoy quality audio while on those head-bobbing running workouts with the best CNET hand-tested earbuds.

The new Dyson WashG1 brings the British brand's expertise in cleaning carpets to washing your hard floors.

Hurricane Helene left widespread damage in Western North Carolina where officials are still looking for at least 600 people unaccounted for. Law enforcement in Tennessee say an estimated 100 people have been reported missing.

(Image credit: Melissa Sue Gerrits)

The home DNA testing boom is over, and 23andMe is running out of options.

You won't find a more satisfying low-carb snack anywhere. Trust me.

Could Vice President Harris have used these Bluetooth audio earrings to gain any debate advantage? Not on your life.

A US jury has ruled Amazon Web Services (AWS) willingly infringed on two patents, and must now pay $30.5 million for violating the patent owner's rights in computer networking and broadcasting technology.

The offending technologies were AWS’s Cloudfront content delivery network and Virtual Private Cloud virtual network - which infringed on the patents originally owned by Boeing, but obtained by Acceleration Bay.

The two patents in this case are said to involve methods of streamlining data delivery across a network. Without getting too technical, the technologies allow data to be sent from peer to peer and flow around slow or broken connections by forming a network.

Assertion entity

Acceleration Bay describes itself as an ‘Incubator & Investor’, and recently won a separate patent trial against Activision, in which the video game developer was ordered to pay $23.4 million.

The final court’s judgement in the AWS case will come soon, but the payout could yet triple, due to the fact that Amazon 'willfully' breached the patents. AWS cloud services reportedly brings in around $9 billion operating profit per quarter - which is around 62% of Amazon’s total, so it probably won’t be hit too hard by the charges.

This isn’t the first time AWS has faced opposition with patented technology, having had to pay $525 million in damages earlier in 2024 after losing a cloud storage patent case.

The tech giant has also had a long-running spat with Nokia, with both firms bringing forward patent lawsuits against each other in recent years - most recently, in August 2024, AWS accused Nokia of over a dozen infringements for cloud computing technologies.

Since AWS is a dominant player in the cloud storage game, naturally it controls a lot of the technologies involved, which it claimed Nokia was using without permission.

Via The Register

More from TechRadar Pro

• Check out our pick of the best cloud computing services
• Google Cloud unveils major infrastructure investment across Southeast Asia
• Take a look at our best external hard drive choices

New sources claim that AMD’s RDNA 4-based graphics cards, originally rumored to be launching at the end of 2024, are behind schedule and now expected to launch in 2025.

The news doesn’t come completely out of nowhere. We previously reported on hardware leaker Kepler’s claim that AMD would not release their RDNA 4-based GPUs until CES 2025. But conflicting rumors suggested a late 2024 release.

More interesting than the news itself are the alleged reasons for the delay. Moore’s Law is Dead revealed in a recent YouTube video exclusively from a reliable source that the RDNA 4 line of GPUs is delayed because AMD is struggling to shift its top-end RDNA 3-based GPUs, in particular those built around the Navi 31, like the RX 7900 and RX 7900 XTX.

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX, built on Navi 31 architecture (Image credit: Future)

Reports suggest AMD’s RDNA 4 focuses on delivering value for money, strong performance, and energy efficiency, keeping its sights firmly on the mid-range market. Nvidia, on the other hand, remains focused on its next-gen RTX 5000 series, opting to prioritize high-performance instead.

The RDNA 4 GPUs consist of the Navi 44 and 48 and will also focus on improved raytracing; they’ll have better clock speeds, GDDR6 memory, and AMD’s infinity cache. It’s said that they will offer a 10-30% performance improvement over the RDNA 3-based cards.

It’s not surprising, then, that the top-range RDNA 3-based models aren’t selling so well. Some customers may be waiting for the next-gen cards that will improve on performance at a lower price point. Others may even overlook the RDNA 4 models in anticipation for AMD’s already-in-development RDNA 5 GPUs, which are set to potentially feature more high-end models, and according to wccftech, “will be built on a completely different architecture”.

Given these reports, it seems wise for AMD to delay the launch – if there were ever plans for a late 2024 launch – to shift the remaining RDNA 3 stocks. Moore’s Law is Dead’s source also mentioned that AMD’s mid-range RDNA 3s were selling fine. The issue of low sales is only affecting its top tier range.

So it appears to remain true that AMD will first debut its flagship Navi 48 at CES 2025, with the Navi 44 still having its launch somewhere in Q2 of 2025.

As it stands, 2025 now looks like the year AMD’s RDNA 4 GPUs will finally hit the market.

You may also like

• Nvidia RTX 5080 and 5090 again rumored for CES 2025 launch – possibly alongside next-gen laptop GPUs
• We could be witnessing the death of the graphics card in real time right now, and I couldn’t be happier about it
• The best cheap graphics card prices and deals for October 2024

Keep things cozy while RVing with one of the best mattresses available. CNET's experts have tested and picked the top options for van life.

It’s just like a savings account, with one awesome difference: You'll earn a lot more interest.

Whether you're in an office, device-filled home or dorm, these Anker outlet extenders are sure to save the day and keep your gadgets charged.

With Monday's closure of Ratcliffe-on-Soar, coal is no longer being used to provide electricity in the UK.

There isn't a new installment of the drama series this week.

It's a miracle that the free Internet lasted as long as it did. It's been nearly 30 years of mostly unfettered, free content access to everything from magazine articles and newspapers to videos and recipes. The steady devolution of the online advertising business made free online content an economic equation that no one could solve.

If you need further evidence that your free internet is evaporating like snow on an early spring day, look at CNN.com. The popular online news platform, an arm of the still popular cable news network, is putting up a paywall.

It won't block you from seeing all CNN.com posts but will limit the number you can see for free. It's unclear if that will be a few a day or a dozen per month. However, once you hit the limit, CNN.com will prompt you to subscribe for $3.99 a month or $29.99 a year. That's not a lot, and for all-you-can-eat access, some might consider it a bargain. Even so, it'll be an adjustment, especially for those who've been accessing the site since it launched "on the World Wide Web" in August of 1995.

CNN.com is not alone in this. TechRadar competitor The Verge is reportedly considering a paywall and I can guarantee similar discussions are underway at every "free website". Good content, everything from short news posts and long product reviews to essays and videos, is costly to make. If display ads (the ads that surround this post) aren't paying the bills, possibly because too many of you use an ad blocker or fewer people are viewing your content and the ads because Google is delivering AI-generated content synopsis on search results, you have to find a new way to fund that content.

Other sources

Even without those forces, traditional media like CNN.com is struggling because a large segment of the online audience is getting their news elsewhere: usually YouTube or TikTok. It's unlikely a two-minute TikTok has all the depth of a CNN.com or Washington Post piece, but that doesn't matter. Gen Z trusts those sources and will usually turn there first.

Obviously, many of us still rely on these traditional OG websites for news and information and are not used to paying for the content. And, to be honest, we don't usually willingly enter Paywall land.

There are strategies honed on platforms like The New York Times, The Atlantic, Business Insider, and others, where we find ways to see more than our share of free content. Usually, this involves opening another browser window in Private Browsing or Incognito Mode, which means you don't carry the cookies that tell the website how many posts you've already viewed. This method usually only works for a single post, but there is satisfaction in reading that one extra story.

I know I'm the last person who should be doing this, and sometimes I wonder how I can be so cheap. The truth is, I already pay for a lot of content. I have subscriptions to The New York Times and The New Yorker. We also subscribe to our local newspaper.

Also, wasn't the Internet supposed to be free?

Modeling subscriptions

Maybe not. The World Wide Web was launched for free almost by accident. When the Internet arrived, it had no interface. Then, some enterprising programmers built early web browsers that could translate Internet data via HTML into browsable and interlinked pages. (Yes, a massive oversimplification of what really happened.)

The Web grew so fast and spread so wide that no one even had time to figure out a decent economic model. We did understand the web offered content consumption and audience measurability in ways virtually impossible with traditional media. That was a bonanza for traditional advertisers who desperately wanted access to all those eyeballs.

And they got them in droves. However, the efficacy of these ads started sliding almost as soon as they started appearing. There were a lot of bad actors back then who thought it was OK not only to run online ads but also to make them pop-ups. Visiting some sites was like playing a game of whack-a-mole. Naturally, if you visited an adult site, you probably got what you deserved.

It's been almost two decades of us knowing that a full-time free internet was unsustainable, but the reality is just now catching up with our consumption. Free was a dream we all had and it was a wonderful one while it lasted. Now we're waking up on if not the wrong side of the bed, the costly side of the paywall.

You might also like

• Fed up with Disney Plus? Here's how to cancel your subscription
• I was sick of forgetting files, but this app lets me access my devices from anywhere in the world
• I was tired of scrolling – this app woke me up and made me smarter

A lucrative bank account bonus can add free cash to your bottom line.

Save a staggering $200 off this state-of-the-art grill just before Prime Day.

Amos starred as the family patriarch on the hit 1970s sitcom “Good Times" and earned an Emmy nomination for his role in the seminal 1977 miniseries “Roots."

(Image credit: Amy Sussman)