TechRadar Reviews

If you’re looking to try a sit-stand desk without investing in a full electric tabletop, look no further; the Yo-Yo Desk 90 is a fantastic split-level desk converter that will get you started on your quest to increase your time spent standing.

With this clever, 15-height standing desk converter, any desk can be transformed into a standing desk, provided it’s sturdy and large enough to house it. Luckily, it comes in three sizes; the Yo-Yo desk converter 80, 90 and 120, with the numbers correlating to the width of the surface. For this review, I tested the Yo-Yo Desk 90.

So, how does the Yo-Yo desk stand up against some of the best standing desk converters and even the best standing desks? We put it to the test. 

Yo-Yo Desk 90 desk converter: Specs

Made from engineered wood with aluminium, the Yo-Yo Desk 90 desk converter is a robust unit of a standing desk converter, available in both black and white colorways.

In itself, it weighs 20kg, but it can support up to 15kg, meaning your laptop, monitor and a few other peripherals can safely stand upon its 89cm x 59cm top surface and 89cm x 32cm keyboard tray. The main worktop lifts from 15cm to 35cm high, and the keyboard from 0 - 35cm, offering a good range of height for most people - though if you’re on the taller side (and if you also want to use a standing mat) it will be a little on the low side.

For what it is and for its build quality, I’m pretty happy with the price of the Yo-Yo desk 90 desk converter. At £329.95 (£199.95 / £379.95 in its smaller and larger configurations, respectively), it’s a darn sight cheaper than a full standing desk, but of course you lose some of the height potential and electronic features. There are regular discounts, too, so watch out for those to save a little extra. 

With its smooth-action gas spring, the Yo-Yo Desk 90 offers 15 adjustable heights, and allows you to swiftly and safely switch from sitting to standing in seconds using easy-press levers on each side.

Yo-Yo Desk 90 desk converter: Shipping & unboxing

Arriving in just one box, the Yo-Yo Desk 90 is impressively easy to set up - though you’ll need two people to lift its 20kg frame out of its packaging and onto a desk. Inside, you’ll find the main frame and the unattached keyboard tray, two keyboard tray brackets, eight screws and a Philips Screwdriver.

Yo-Yo Desk 90 desk converter: Assembly

Once unboxed, it’s as simple as attaching the side cap to the connecting arm, using the provided screwdriver to affix the keyboard tray brackets to the tray and then hang the tray brackets on the rotating bracket holders before tightening everything up.

Yo-Yo advertises that this takes only five minutes, and I’m sure that’s true if you know exactly what you’re doing, perhaps having installed a Yo-Yo Desk before - but for me, it took about 10 minutes.

Yo-Yo Desk 90 desk converter: First impressions

(Image credit: Yo-Yo )

 When I first saw the fully built Yo-Yo Desk 90 on my workstation, I was pretty happy with the results. Sure, it’s not exactly a looker, but it does offer plenty of real estate and impressively smooth motion. It takes a little while to get used to the controls, for some reason - it feels almost as though you really want to crank the levers, but the gas canisters do their job well of smoothly and effortlessly switching between the tabletop and standing configuration.  

Yo-Yo Desk 90 desk converter: Design

The Yo-Yo Desk 90 is a split-level sit-to-stand desk, meaning it offers a keyboard and mouse tray as well as a higher surface for your monitor and any other peripherals - it supports clamp-mounted monitor arms, too - meaning you’ll have no trouble filling its 89cm x 59cm top surface and 89cm x 32cm keyboard tray.

While its overall look is very functional, it’s well thought-through; the extra depth squeezed into the keyboard tray where the frame cuts into the way the unit compresses in such a way that the keyboard doesn’t need to be repositioned every time. 

There are a few drawbacks to note. A big one for me is that, especially with these mechanical controls, I’d have liked to see a cable port in the rear of the worktop to keep cables tidy and clear of the mechanisms. I also found the keyboard tray regularly falls off, becoming unhinged from its hooks as the day goes on. It’s not the end of the world if you’re only placing your keyboard and mouse on there, but I wouldn’t load it up with anything that can be spilled or broken too easily just in case.

Yo-Yo Desk 90 desk converter: Performance

(Image credit: Yo-Yo )

The Yo-Yo Desk 90 desk converter is wonderfully easy to adjust, smoothly transitioning between its 15 height settings with minimal effort - though you’ll need to keep an eye out for loose cables that might get caught during use. It’s whisper-quiet, too, meaning it won’t disturb your colleagues.

It does wobble ever so slightly, but I could say that for many a desk I’ve worked on over the years, and of course that also comes down to the surface it’s standing upon. 

Yo-Yo Desk 90 desk converter: Accessories

While Yo-Yo doesn’t offer any accessories that can be integrated into the desk, there are a number of add-ons available, from office chairs to monitor arms and other peripherals. 

For more office furniture accessories, we reviewed the best standing desk mats. 

Yo-Yo Desk 90 desk converter: Final verdict

If you already have a tabletop you like, or don’t want to invest in a full standing desk setup, the Yo-Yo Desk 90 desk converter is a fantastic option that will meet most people’s needs. 

Granted, it’s a bulky alternative, and if you really value the feng shui of your deskspace you might find it a little too makeshift for your needs, but its range of heights, sturdy frame and smooth adjustment system work effectively. It’s a shame about the keyboard tray, and that this issue seems to be problematic for a fair few customers, but if you don’t mind the mild inconvenience of re-hooking it once or twice a day, it’s not the end of the world.

Overall, it’s a great product, and it’s a mainstay for many offices for a reason. 

For more workspace essentials, we reviewed the best office chairs.

Backblaze is one of the best cloud backup services that we've tested, providing unlimited storage with no file size limits for a very reasonable price. The company started in 2007 as a way for a developer to backup a friend’s computer online. Fast forward to the present, and it is used by over 500,000 customers.

Get Backblaze for free with every ExpressVPN purchase
ExpressVPN, TechRadar's #1 best VPN provider, is offering free unlimited cloud backup courtesy of Backblaze for a whole year with its annual subscription. Secure, business-grade online backup for everyone, no strings attached.View Deal

If you're just looking for an ultra-simple high capacity backup service, then Backblaze is a must-see, especially as with only a single payment tier and unlimited storage, you're always paying just the same amount, not matter how much you upload.

Backblaze is entirely focused on backups, which means there's no file syncing, no clever collaboration tools, and only the simplest of file sharing options. This can be a positive or negative, depending on your requirements. 

Alternatively, if you need a VPN to protect yourself online, you can get Backblaze completely free for a year when you sign up to our #1 favorite, ExpressVPN (and you get three extra months of ExpressVPN protection, too).

Backblaze: Plans and pricing

You can try Backblaze for free for 15 days without providing any payment card information. As expected, there's no free tier since you get unlimited cloud backup. Personal plans cost $9 monthly, $99 a year, or $189 every two years. There is also a $2 monthly charge to upgrade file version history from 30 days to one year, which, in our opinion, is a must.

Business customers get similar pricing. However, you should contact Backblaze directly for quotes for backing up multiple computers and servers and storing more data in the cloud for long-term storage. This is especially useful if you're replacing tape backups. It's refreshing to see this sort of flexible pricing, but it does make it more challenging to compare Backblaze against competing services.

(Image credit: Backblaze)

(Image credit: Backblaze) Backblaze: Features

Backblaze doesn’t bother you with the details of your backup plan, just that it is occurring: when you initially install the desktop client, it doesn’t require you to select files and folders, but rather just grabs all the files and folders it considers important and starts transferring them to your Backblaze cloud backup.

By default, Backblaze copies all data except ISOs, DMGs (Mac disk image), virtual drives, system files or executables. Backblaze also won't backup files created by other backup utilities like Time Machine.

You have the option to exclude other file types if you wish, but unless exclusively told to ignore them, it will include everything except the file types listed. During our testing, we found it very simple and straightforward, and you can rest easy that your entire computer can be recovered if needed.

(Image credit: Backblaze)

The tool is a "set-it-and-forget-it" solution. It's there to help you recover data such as if your hard drive catastrophically fails or your laptop fails to boot.

However, Backblaze is not designed for syncing files between computers, or getting at your music and video files in the cloud. You can include external hard drives and portable SSDs and, on a business plan, servers in your backups, although networked drives can't be included. While file sharing is possible, the feature can only be accessed through the web interface.

Backups can be continuous and this is a default option. They can also be configured to occur once a day, or just when you initiate them manually. Some extra variety with those timescales would be nice, but we expect the majority of users will leave it set to continuous backup mode. Although you can backup an unlimited amount of data, you are restricted to one computer for each Backblaze account, and mobile devices aren't included.

The fact that you can't select files or folders to backup individually can be an inconvenience if you only want to back up certain files. For instance, your Documents folder may contain irreplaceable data but your Pictures might not. You also can't fine-tune which folders within these directories are backed up. On the plus side, there's little chance of anything valuable being missed during backup.

(Image credit: Backblaze)

As standard, unlimited versions of files are kept, though only for a period of 30 days. This can be somewhat restrictive, especially as weeks can pass before you realize that you are missing an important document. Given the reasonable price for the standard plan, combined with the fact that an unlimited amount of storage could hold thousands of folders filled with documents, images and videos, we think the extra $2 a month (or $14 a year) for extended file history is a no-brainer. This extends it to one year. For an extra $2 per month and $0.005/GB per file, Backblaze can also store file versions forever.

While only one computer is supported per license, totally unlimited data storage with no file size limits means that Backblaze should never be the restricting element to your backing-up needs. This makes it a hugely valuable tool that is also affordable compared to rivals such as Polarbackup, LiveDrive, and Carbonite, all of which offer unlimited storage plans that are currently more expensive.

Because there are no subscription tiers, every account benefits from otherwise premium features. Uploading and downloading when using the desktop client is unthrottled, which means superquick backups up to the maximum speed of your ISP and router.

Backblaze has built-in safeguards to limit the amount of bandwidth consumed. The Control Panel settings list the latest upload speed and the amount of data backed up per day on average. In order to give users more control, manual throttling can limit the amount of bandwidth used by the app in order to prioritize other tasks. This can be useful for workers who often find themselves on video calls, as it allows backups to continue automatically in the background while providing optimal speeds for your workload.

Backblaze: Interface and use

The Backblaze desktop client targets simplicity over power. The options of the Backblaze package are limited, so the software doesn't have to do much except focus on the job at hand - to make sure that your files are getting continuously backed up in the background.

There is an option to exclude certain files and folders from a Backblaze backup, but we found it could be more straightforward. Considering you get an unlimited amount of space in the cloud, it's easier to just let Backblaze backup everything, just in case. 

Transferring data from an entire computer to the web is potentially a lengthy process, but the speeds Backblaze managed were impressive. You can also choose to pause or throttle the upload process if you think Backblaze is taking up too much bandwidth to override the automatic throttling.

(Image credit: Backblaze)

We like its integration within the operating system that helps to simplify the backup process - or at least, for those rare events that users need to modify controls. In this case, Backblaze sits neatly in System Preferences within macOS for instance. The Backblaze control panel can also be launched via a handy system tray icon in Windows.

Like the desktop client, the web interface is also cut down and minimal, letting you review backed up files and restore them if needed. There's also a mechanism for sharing stored files to others that is exclusive to the web interface. Unfortunately, in terms of web functionality, Backblaze falls short of Dropbox, Google Drive, or Apple iCloud when it comes to sharing files. However, it is ultimately a different proposition so this comparison is, perhaps, slightly unfair.

In the event of a system failure or loss, files can be downloaded for free, or Backblaze will put them on a USB hard drive for $189 and ship your data to your door. While it may not do much beyond suck up all the files on a computer and let you restore them, Backblaze does these core jobs very well. The almost $200 spent on backing up your files should be seen more as a holding fee for the value of the large hard drive (up to 8TB), as when the restore is complete you can return it by mail and receive a full refund.

Backups are limited to PCs and Macs, however alongside the web interface there are iOS and Android apps that allow you to access your data from anywhere. Backblaze Mobile 6.0, released in December 2022, has a new feel to it with authentication improvements for both platforms plus many tweaks and updates.

Backblaze: Security

Backblaze gets high marks from a security perspective: as you can enable two-step authentication on your account. 

The company behind the tool also claims that backed up files on your machine are protected with AES 128-bit encryption, the key for which is generated randomly for each backup session. Also worth noting is that users can pick between EU and US data centers.

The data is sent securely via an SSL connection to avoid your data being intercepted as it travels through the internet. Backblaze also says it uses OpenSSL for generating the necessary encryption keys to do this. While it's not full end-to-end encryption, it's certainly safe enough for most users. But if you do want end-to-end encryption, you can also set up a private encryption key, known only to you, which adds an extra layer of protection to your data. 

The downside of this is that Backblaze can’t help you if you forget the key, and you need to share it with Backblaze if you ever need to restore your data.

Backblaze: How we tested

We performed three primary tests for Backblaze, focusing on sync speed, file recovery, and versioning.

These tests were carried out on a Windows 11 virtual machine using the Backblaze desktop client. The virtual machine was connected to the internet via a fiber broadband connection with a VPN server. Throughout our speed tests, we consistently recorded an average upload speed of 70 Mbps.

Test 1 - Sync speed 

Our typical approach for evaluating cloud storage providers involves copying a 589MB folder containing various file types, such as PDFs, JPGs, Microsoft Word documents, and more, and then assessing the desktop client's synchronization speed. However, Backblaze primarily functions as an all-or-nothing backup solution. Therefore, for this particular test, we were compelled to allow the utility to back up everything in the home folder, including the test files.

Although Backblaze is designed for backups rather than traditional cloud storage, it is possible to use backed-up files for cloud storage purposes indirectly. Nevertheless, there is no straightforward method to selectively back up only a specific folder as we usually do for our standard cloud storage service tests. Consequently, we allowed Backblaze to back up all the folders in the test machine's home directory, including our test files.

This resulted in a data volume slightly exceeding 6GB, and the upload to Backblaze's servers was completed in less than 10 minutes. Therefore, our test files took just over a minute to upload. This performance is commendable, especially when considering that our average upload speed was 70Mbps, significantly faster than what many other cloud storage providers offer.

(Image credit: Future)

Test 1 - File Recovery

During our second test, we purposefully placed the test folder containing our files in the Recycle Bin and then manually triggered another backup. Once the backup was complete, we accessed the online Backblaze Control Panel through the desktop client and selected the Restore Options. Locating the test folder was straightforward, and upon choosing to Restore, we received a message stating that further instructions would be sent to us via email. 

Upon checking our inbox, we found an email containing a link to download a ZIP file of the folder. We were also given the option to install the Backblaze Downloader app. Upon extraction, we discovered that the folder was organized within a directory structure mirroring our device. For example, the main folder was 'C,' and we found another folder named 'Users,' and so forth. Despite this multi-step process, we successfully recovered all the files.

Test 3 - Versioning

Versioning is an important feature when working on documents as it allows you to revert back to previous versions of the file. When Backblaze backed up all the files in the home directory, it included the original version of our test document. We opened this in Wordpad, deleted all the text except the intro, saved and closed the file, and then ran another backup. 

After selecting "Restore Options" from the desktop client, we were able to recover the file from the first backup in the same way as we did for the deleted test folder. We chose to download the document as a ZIP file. Once extracted, the document opened without any issues.

Backblaze: Final verdict

Backblaze should be near the top of your shortlist if you want a comprehensive, unlimited, secure backup of all of the data from your home or business computers.

Backblaze isn't a simple cloud storage solution so much as a comprehensive cloud backup solution-rather than allow for some files and folders to be backed up it will simply grab everything. This means if you only want to sync individual files and folders this could prove tricky. 

Additionally, when it comes to restoring deleted/modified data, we can't see any logic in offering a separate downloader app when this code could be integrated into Backblaze itself.  

Still, Backblaze has a large user base, and it’s easy to see why – if you want to back up everything from one computer and its external drives, simply and securely and without spending too much, then the service is hard to beat. We appreciate, too, that there are no limits on file sizes and no limits on the amount of data you can send to the cloud.

Just be certain you know exactly what Backblaze is before you sign up. It's not for syncing files between computers or getting easy access to your files through a web browser. It's a comprehensive, set-and-forget cloud backup solution for protecting your data should the worst happen, and at that task it provides a great solution. With stellar performance in that regard, Backblaze is one of the best backup software solutions thanks to its unlimited storage at a reasonable cost, aided by its array of restoration methods and ease of use. 

We've featured the best free cloud storage.

Review info

Platform reviewed: Nintendo Switch
Available on: Nintendo Switch
Release date: November 7, 2024

Mario & Luigi: Brothership is an excellent return to Nintendo’s otherwise languishing role-playing game (RPG) spin-off series, packed chock-full of charm, wit, and whimsy, plus pleasingly detailed combat mechanics that will deliver hours of fun.

In their latest gander, the mustachio'd brothers are whisked away to the land of Concordia and on a quest to reunite its fragmented lands following the destruction of the Unitree that once connected them. It’s a tale with a strong narrative theme; that the bonds between friends, family, and even foes have innate power. In classic Nintendo style, every possible aspect of the game centers itself around its morals to charming effect.

To go with its delightful tone is a robust combat system, largely following suit of its series predecessors but with the added flair of Luigi Logic, new Bros Attacks, and a power-up system called Plugs. It’s silly and fun, offering a moderate challenge as you time your attacks and counters between the two brothers. However, later in the game, the sheer number of enemies can become a bit repetitive, and you’ll likely end up skipping your fair share of battles. Overall, though, it’s very rewarding, and there’s a great variety of enemies and interesting bosses to tackle, making it a standout Nintendo Switch game of 2024.

However, like other recent releases such as The Legend of Zelda: Echoes of Wisdom, Brothership also suffers from occasional performance issues. These are particularly prevalent when there are several enemies on screen or heavy particle effects, affecting even the island navigation map later in the game when more areas are unlocked.

It’s an unfortunate issue, as the game is so beautifully visualized that you want to lavish on every detail. The new 3D sprites for its cast of characters are a welcome visual upgrade, adding new depth of emotion and gesture both in and out of combat. Its lush and well-detailed overworld offers a reasonable amount of exploration, though some of the earlier levels feel underdeveloped when you revisit them towards the end of the game.

While it’s not exactly a contender for game of the year, I thoroughly enjoyed my time with Brothership. The game is great fun, but it’s also warm and inviting, blending some of the franchise's most beloved Mushroom Kingdom friends and foes with charming new Concordian companions to create a rich world filled with love and connection. There’s a real resonance in how Mario & Luigi: Brothership delivers its moral lesson, but entwined with bonny Nintendo flair and slapstick nonsense that makes the game feel truly special.

(Image credit: Nintendo) You can make me whole again

Once transported to Concordia, Mario and Luigi and their new guides Connie and Snoutlet sail the open seas in search of fragmented islands from the former continent of Concordia with a mission to reconnect them to the new Unitree. Each island bears a distinctive theme; from the dance and rhythm-crazed populace of Twistee Island to the rival fire and ice villages of Heatfreeze Island and the desert dwellers of Allsand Island.

The game’s main hub, Shipshape Island, also teems with life, populated by side characters like three gossipy hens that’ll give you clues for side quests as well as equipment and resource shops for stocking up between islands. Along the way, the crew of adventurers grows to welcome a plethora of new characters, with my personal favorite being a band of kids going by the moniker of the IDLE group. As with all of the new companions, Brothership relishes in exploring the bonds they share and create, and there’s a wealth of relations explored through the lens of Concordia. From parental to sibling, found family and friendship to rivalry, and even bonds of love, Nintendo deftly toes the line of cheesiness, keeping the game firmly in the realm of fuzzy feelings.

(Image credit: Nintendo)

It’s not just Concordians that decorate the storyline; throughout the game, you’ll encounter familiar faces from the Mushroom Kingdom, from predictable appearances like Princess Peach, Starlow, and Bowser to welcome surprises like Birdo and even a first-time Mario & Luigi appearance for Dorrie.

This does, however, mean the game can be pretty wordy, often splicing the action with extended character development and conversation that can make the game drag a little at times. In saying that, I did find it hard to breeze through some of the dialogue where I truly enjoyed watching the story play out, especially thanks to its quirky comedy and hyperanimated style. The volume of characters also means there’s a little pressure on some of the characters to condense their personality. Starlow, for example, is a little subdued compared to previous entries in the series, especially when it comes to her love-hate relationship with Luigi.

(Image credit: Nintendo) Land, Ho!

The main quest line is pretty extensive, totaling around 40 hours if you skip every side quest, based on my total game time which was 50 hours after completing a vast majority of optional quests. Occasionally, there are split decisions thrown into the narrative that slightly alter the means or order of storyline progression, but overall it’s pretty linear.

Using Shipshape Island, Mario and Luigi navigate through channels across the oceans of Concordia to scope out the dispersed islands and connect them to the Unitree. The duo then unceremoniously launch themselves upon these islands’ shores, punctuated by an excellent running gag of Luigi never quite sticking the landing, before venturing to solve an ongoing issue for the island’s population or rescue missing Concordians.

Exploring each island is fun, and the game’s new Bros Moves add new dimensions to exploration, especially when boosted later in the game. The first move unlocked, UF-Bro, is easily my favorite; it’s ridiculous but comes in pretty handy and allows for creative level design. There are some pacing issues in level development, however, and it's especially noticeable later in the game when you hop between more complex levels and the fairly basic initial islands. Plus, a lot of time is spent running around thanks to the sparsity of teleportation pipes and very simple maps.

Image 1 of 5

(Image credit: Nintendo)Image 2 of 5

(Image credit: Nintendo)Image 3 of 5

(Image credit: Nintendo)Image 4 of 5

(Image credit: Nintendo)Image 5 of 5

(Image credit: Nintendo)

With the main quest completed and balance restored, the pair must activate each island's lighthouse, thus tethering the entire land mass to Shipshape Island. Especially towards the end of the game, it’s delightfully silly to see Shipshape lug around an entire continents-worth of islands.

There’s also a wealth of side quests to enjoy, an abundance of puzzles, a respectable level of collect-a-thon objectives, and bundles of items and equipment to hoard. Many quests see the mustachio’d bros reconnect or resolve issues between loved ones, with progressively more memorable and interesting missions as the game develops. Some quests need to be completed before the main story progresses, unlocking fun easter egg interactions and unique items that make them feel worthwhile.

Best bit

(Image credit: Nintendo)

Birdo isn’t in the game an awful lot, but there are some great moments in there for the flirtatious pink dinosaur. In particular, one side quest sees an admirer smitten by Birdo’s beauty seeking Mario and Luigi’s help to unite with her. It’s a fun and ever-so-random jaunt that’ll give franchise fans a chuckle.

Occasionally, you even get the opportunity to remote-control Luigi, either by stationing him strategically while using Mario to move around the level or even fully controlling him - though there are only a handful of moments where you get full Luigi action. The main mechanic for giving Luigi some autonomy is Luigi Logic, which triggers when there’s an interactive object or puzzle mechanic he can help with. Broadly, it’s great fun, and can also save time when it comes to farming coins and items, but there are quite a few times when Luigi will get left behind off-screen, which causes Mario to stop in his tracks, turn about-face, and find his stranded sibling. It’s not frequent, but the separation anxiety can be a bit irritating at times.

Otherwise, the main areas to explore are in the game’s dungeons; the Great Lighthouses, and later in the game, various enemy strongholds. The level design for dungeons is pretty consistently well-balanced throughout the game, offering a decent level of challenge and platforming fun while still incorporating a healthy dosage of combat opportunities; though perhaps a little too healthy in places.

(Image credit: Nintendo) Timing is everything

Combat in Mario & Luigi: Brothership is fun and engaging, leveraging the same timed attack and counter mechanic as previous games in the series with the added twist of power-up Plugs and Luigi’s Logic as well as inventive new Bros Attacks to mix things up.

Plugs offer a solid level of variety and dynamic gameplay to battles and become pretty much essential as the baddies scale. Certain combos create enhanced attack, defense, and support abilities during combat, which you can bolster further with clever choices in equipment and leveling bonuses - though you can easily make most compositions work if your timing is solid and your stats are balanced.

Some of the Bros Attacks are more satisfying than others. For example, in Flash Clock, Mario & Luigi dash across a monochrome battlefield where time stands still, taking turns to wallop the enemy if you hit their corresponding attack buttons in good time. That’s eminently more engaging than Mix Tornado, in which you frantically lob orbs of Mario’s fireballs and Luigi’s ice into a spinning tornado in the hopes you complete it enough to whip the enemy into a frenzy.

Image 1 of 8

(Image credit: Nintendo)Image 2 of 8

(Image credit: Nintendo)Image 3 of 8

(Image credit: Nintendo)Image 4 of 8

(Image credit: Nintendo)Image 5 of 8

(Image credit: Nintendo)Image 6 of 8

(Image credit: Nintendo)Image 7 of 8

(Image credit: Nintendo)Image 8 of 8

(Image credit: Nintendo)

Every story must have a villain, but Mario & Luigi: Brothership has several; the most prominent of which being Bowser and the mysterious Zokket. We all know and love Bowser and his modus operandi, and Brothership conveys it with wonderful whimsy. Zokket’s forces, however, are slightly more sinister.

Co-captained by Ecks, Ten, and Shun (AKA the Extension Corps), Zokket’s army is on a quest to harvest and spread ‘Glohm’ throughout Concordia and sever the connections between its denizens. Both monsters and the Mario brothers alike can be inflicted by this gloom, which is designed much like Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild’s malice. In battle, it serves as a new gameplay element that prevents the infected brothers from working together on high-damage attacks and Bros Attacks.

There’s a wide range of enemies in the game, with each offering a fairly distinct move set, and the bosses are pretty fun across the board. The slapstick style and expressive animations keep combat light and fun, but later in the game, the grind becomes a little excessive. Especially as I’d leveled well, I ended up skipping a fair few encounters, even with newer enemies I hadn’t yet tired of, but I still enjoyed pretty much all of the key boss fights.

Bursting with life - literally

While the character design maintains the stylistic simplicity of the wider Mario universe, its aesthetic value is high, which really brings the Mario & Luigi franchise into the modern era of gaming following the ten years of its absence.

Brothership brings the world of Concordia to life with exuberant color and sound. It’s bright, well-stylized, and lush, and the 3D sprites massively expand the depth of emotion and motion possible for the various characters. Combat animations are punchy and energizing, and the music perfectly accents the on-screen action to keep you locked in.

(Image credit: Nintendo)

That does mean, however, that it’s even more of a disappointment to see frame rate drops, which get progressively worse as the game progresses. Towards the end of the game, even the island navigation screen drops frames significantly due to the volume of cubic sparkle effects on screen, and some of the wonderfully animated cutscenes heavily feature the same particle effects and thus suffer the same fate.

When there are many enemies on screen or a series of consecutive graphically intense attacks, combat can also suffer - which is less than ideal when there are timed attacks to tackle. I didn’t experience an unforgivable level of performance issues, and hopefully, at least some of these can be fixed in a later patch. Still, it’s always disappointing to see, especially when the game is so lovely to look at.

Otherwise, animations are broadly smooth. I gladly sacrificed a few turns and counters during combat to enjoy every detail of enemy attack animations, and the cutscenes are just delightful. I even nearly shed a tear during a few, though I’m especially soppy when it comes to a good tear-jerker.

(Image credit: Nintendo) Should I play Mario & Luigi: Brothership? Play it if…

You want a modernized Mario & Luigi RPG
While Brothership does well to capture what made earlier games popular among fans, it's added in a good amount of depth and aesthetic appeal to make the game feel contemporary.

You want a moderate challenge, but a lot of heart
It's no Baldur's Gate 3, but Brothership takes an earnest swing at combat. It's pretty approachable, and will give you the option to dial down the difficulty of combat, but only after you've given it a good go.

Don’t play it if…

Performance issues grate on you
It's far from a poor performance, but the occasional frame rate drops are disappointing, and especially when you're trying to enjoy the beautifully animated world of Concordia.

Accessibility

There are no dedicated accessibility settings on Mario & Luigi: Brothership. There’s one difficulty setting, but if you lose a combat or time-based mini-game a few times, you’re offered an easy mode to help you overcome the challenge. This is particularly disappointing when combat is so heavily based on timed and held button inputs, and where there are multiple times that visual cues are delivered by color. Players with congenital red-green color blindness, in particular, would have great difficulty in performing many Bros Attacks and puzzles.

(Image credit: Nintendo) How I reviewed Mario & Luigi: Brothership

I played over 40 hours of Mario & Luigi: Brothership on Nintendo Switch OLED. During that time I completed the main story and played in a combination of both handheld and docked mode. While docked, I played on a 1080p monitor and used a Nintendo Switch Pro Controller. In handheld mode, I played using the standard Joy-Con controls.

To draw comparisons, I've reflected on my experience with other series entries such as Mario & Luigi: Dream Team and Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story as well as other turn-based RPGs like Octopath Traveller, alongside different games from the wider Mario franchise such as Super Mario: Odyssey.

First reviewed November 2024.

Review info

Platform reviewed: PlayStation 5
Available on: PS5, PS4, Xbox Series X|S, PC
Release date: November 8, 2024

Slitterhead is a weird horror game. The combat is a bit stiff, it reuses environments (and sometimes missions), and lacks voice acting outside of the occasional fully-voiced scene. Yet it’s probably the most refreshing game I’ve played in a while, and is far more than the sum of its parts. Behind that veneer of rust and dirt is a compelling storyline that uses its horror elements to craft a brilliant mystery that had me rethinking the entire story constantly.

You play as Hyoki: a lost spirit in the fictitious town of Kowlong with the ability to possess human beings (as well as the occasional dog). However, Kowlong is plagued with Slitterheads: monsters who assume the form of human beings in order to feed on them. Among these humans are Rarities, beings who have a unique connection with the spirit and are able to retain their consciousness while possessed, while having their own combat abilities to boot.

Visions of an impending apocalypse lead Hyoki to team up with a young woman named Julee and a mysterious man named Alex to destroy the Slitterhead populace to change their fate. However, the spirit discovers it is able to go back in time while retaining memories; however, this reveals another layer, as each time they go back, things aren’t as they once were. One aspect I loved about this tale is that it tackles the hypocrisy of a spirit that takes over the consciousness of people, battling evil beings that take over the consciousness of people. This led to me getting invested in the lives of those on both sides of the story.

Head like a haunted house

(Image credit: Bokeh Game Studios)

Despite being directed by horror royalty Keiichiro Toyama (creator of Silent Hill and Siren), horror is more of a backdrop in Slitterhead, as the game plays out like a detective story. You’ll be trying to figure out just what is happening in Kowlong while simultaneously figuring out who in the crowded city is secretly a monster. The main gameplay loop is heading into a mission, investigating, before running into a Slitterhead who you’ll need to take out.

As the adventure progresses, you’ll run into more and more Rarities who join your cause. Between missions, you’ll be able to chat with them a la Persona’s social links and learn more about each of them. These range from people of all walks of life, doctors, a high school student, the homeless, and even an elderly woman. Despite some having more screen time than others (the story is mainly focused on Julee and Alex), I loved learning about the characters I was taking into battle.

The regular humans have a club and two unique skills (as well as two slots for your rarities bonus skills), while you can bring two Rarities out on a mission with you, who have their own unique skill sets based on their personalities. Edo – who lived as a boxer before being forced to live on the streets – is a fast-paced, hard-hitting character with a moveset designed around getting in the opponent's face and wearing them down. Meanwhile, Julee – who is compassionate and has reservations over human lives being used by Hyoki in service of Slitterhead destruction, has abilities to avoid damaging non-player characters (NPCs) and reviving a number at once.

Combat isn’t the most in-depth in terms of combos. You have a standard combo and a heavy attack alongside four unique skills depending on which Rarity combo you take into the field. But where the combat really shines is in the possession mechanic; switching about from host to host is near-mandatory and adds an extra layer of strategy to what could’ve been a barebones beat 'em up. This is complemented by a For Honor-esque parry system, which can send you into a slow-mo state to really while on your enemies.

Who can it be now?

(Image credit: Bokeh Game Studios)

The biggest issue the game faces is also in part due to the time loop mechanic. The missions mostly take place in the same few city blocks, which can lead to a bit of repetition, and while the mandatory mission replays will have new tricks, you are still replaying parts. This becomes an issue later in the game as you’ll play the same two missions multiple times in a row to progress the story.

The other problem is that sometimes the objective of the game is unclear. It’s easy to get lost in the city, and without a map system, it’s a bit of a pain to navigate when there are no waypoint markers. This gets especially rough at a point in the middle where you need to find two hidden Rarities to progress, where I combed through the same missions a few times before cracking it.

Best bit

(Image credit: Bokeh Game Studios)

One of Slitterhead’s most investing moments is investigating the Echoes of Love Society. While these missions are slower-paced, this storyline opens up some interesting questions about the nature of Slitterheads and the ethical issues surrounding your mission.

Visually, the game is a bit of a mixed bag; the neon-soaked streets of Kowlong are gorgeous, and the character models for the main characters look great, but the human fodder characters is a bit less polished, which really stands out if you take them into a cutscene. Meanwhile, the creature design from Siren designer Miki Takahashi is nothing short of phenomenal. The different breeds of Slitterhead are disgusting and impressive bits of body horror to boot. While the game isn’t too scary, these monsters are unsettling, especially when you see them transform.

Slitterhead also reunites Toyama with Silent Hill composer Akira Yamaoka – which is all I should need to tell you to let you know the music and sound design are fantastic. The soundtrack ranges from the oppressive industrial sounds Yamaoka is famed for to some nice lo-fi beats that make the menus a joy to navigate. And the titular monsters sound just as gross as they look.

Still, Slitterhead is not without its problems, but these are mostly relegated to the gameplay. While the combat is fun and engaging, it could do with a bit more combo variety. Meanwhile, the reused missions and environments don’t necessarily feel like padding, but they can be grating at certain points. However, it’s more than worth moving past those flaws to find one of the most unique and interesting horror experiences in a long time.

(Image credit: Bokeh Game Studios) Should you play Slitterhead? Play it if...

You’re after a unique experience from a horror legend
Slitterhead does take inspiration from Toyama’s previous games, like Siren’s Sightjacking mechanic. But Slitterhead is a unique beast that’s more about detective work and intense combat than straight-up horror. Plus, the time loop mechanic adds an extra layer to an already interesting story.

You like strategically focused combat encounters
Slitterhead’s possession mechanic is a cool thing in many ways, from traversal to just seeing who and what you can take control of. However, it adds an extra layer to combat as you’ll be constantly switching between hosts to flank enemies, while careful consideration of what rarities is a must.

Don't play it if...

You’re after a highly polished AAA game
I rarely encountered glitches in Slitterhead, but it’s not as polished as your usual AAA affair. While the Rarities, cutscenes, and environments look lush, NPC character models are a bit lackluster, and the awkward use of voice acting is an unfortunate flaw.

You can’t stomach body horror
Slitterhead’s grotesque horror is tough to stomach; you’ll constantly see human heads explode into viscera as their Slitterhead forms burst out. This is even worse for the bosses, as you see the transformation even slower and in more detail as their necks extend and contort.

Accessibility

The accessibility features in Slitterhead need some work. While the option to fully rebind your controls is a welcome addition, outside of multiple language options, subtitles (without closed captioning), and difficulty options, there’s not much else to talk about here unfortunately.

(Image credit: Bokeh Game Studios) How I reviewed Slitterhead

I played Slitterhead for around 18 hours completing the game’s main storyline (including the true ending) and unlocking all of the rarities and a majority of the costumes. In my playthrough, I played on Hard difficulty for the majority before switching to Medium when the level replays were introduced.

I played the game on my PlayStation 5 Slim on a DualSense wireless controller (although it felt wrong to play with the Astro Bot Controller). For my screen, I used a Samsung Q65T 50-inch QLED 4K TV, and for my audio, I switched between the PlayStation Pulse 3D Wireless headset and a Samsung HW-T450 Soundbar.

First review November 2024

JBL Authentics 200: Two-minute review

We pride ourselves on having tested all of the most notable and best wireless speakers on the market at TechRadar, so it’s always a welcome moment when one comes along that does things a bit differently. That’s very much the case with the Authentics 200: one look at this vintage-inspired beauty is all you need to see that JBL has gone its own way here.

From the curved foam grille to the aluminium frame, the Authentics 200 is a stunning homage to amps of old. That retro aesthetic is matched by a solid build which, apart from the plastic dials on top, feels wonderfully premium. It’s distinctive enough to get people talking, without ever feeling like a fad.

Its beauty is more than skin deep. JBL has been generous with the feature set: you get Wi-Fi streaming from a range of services, multi-room audio, as well as connectivity with the slick JBL One app. That’s where you can integrate it with different streaming platforms and customize the EQ – although it’s more fun to do that physically by rotating the treble and bass knobs on the unit itself.

The app is also where you can connect the Authentics 200 to both Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant (yes, JBL has aimed to make it of the best smart speakers too). Crossover between the two isn’t seamless, mind, but support for both at the same time means you can have full access to their respective services from a single speaker.

Then there’s the listening experience, which is superlative. In our tests, the Authentics 200 impressed us at every turn – from the powerful bass to the clear treble, balanced with rich mids that give wonderful definition. Separation is impressive, and there’s a depth to its soundstage that delivers remarkable immersion for a single speaker.

It’s not the cheapest smart speaker you can buy, nor does it have the Atmos compatibility of the less expensive Amazon Echo Studio, for example. But if you value its heritage design – as well as its premium feature set and sound quality – there’s really nothing else like the Authentics 200.

JBL Authentics 200 review: Price and release date

• Released August 2023
• Officially priced at $349.99 / £299.99 / AU$299

The JBL Authentics 200 was released in August 2023, priced at $349.99 / £299.99 / AU$299. It was launched alongside the larger, Atmos-compatible JBL Authentics 500, which is significantly more costly, at $699.99 / £579.99 / AU$999.

Pitched as a high-quality smart speaker with a retro look, its price tag is at the upper end for the category. Arguably its closest competitor is the Amazon Echo Studio, which costs $199.99 / £219.99 / $349. Also in that price bracket is the Sonos Era 100, priced at $249 / £229.99 / $399. 

That gives the JBL Authentics 200 some stiff competition, setting the bar high for it to justify the extra outlay. As you’ll read below, though, we think its design, features and sound quality do a very good job of that.

(Image credit: Future) JBL Authentics 200 review: Specs

(Image credit: Future) JBL Authentics 200 review: Features

• Wi-Fi streaming from a wide range of services
• Simultaneous support for Google Assistant and Amazon Alexa
• Support for multi-room playback

Despite its heritage looks, the JBL Authentics 200 is every bit the modern smart speaker. Wi-Fi streaming includes support for AirPlay, Chromecast and Spotify Connect, with multi-room playback available through AirPlay, Google Home and Alexa Multi-Room Music. Strangely for a speaker that doesn’t pick sides, you won’t find Spotify or Apple Music in the app’s list of supported music streaming services though – which means neither works with the shortcut button.

Still, this is a speaker that’s happy to receive audio from pretty much any source. That includes a USB-C input on the back, as well as the option to keep things old-school with Ethernet and 3.5mm inputs. While we’re all for wireless streaming, these wired options are always welcome, especially if you’re not blessed with consistent signal throughout your home. For our part, we didn’t experience any dropouts during our time with the Authentics 200.

Initial setup was simple using the JBL One app. It’s a pretty foolproof piece of software that makes it easy to control the Authentics 200 and adjust settings. We were online in less than a minute, with an update over Wi-Fi quickly out of the way. Connecting Alexa and Google Assistant proved similarly seamless, with no hiccups hooking up to either. Network and voice assistant status is signalled by a single LED in the grille, with a handy table in the guide to help you decipher its various colors and states of solid, pulsing and flashing.

With both voice assistants activated, we had no trouble getting each to respond. In theory, where there’s overlap between supported services, either assistant should be able to start or stop a command. In our experience, this crossover wasn’t always seamless. We found it simpler to stick with one assistant for a specific task. So when we asked Alexa to play a song on Spotify, we asked her to stop it as well.

In reality, there’s rarely a need to jump between the two assistants, and you’ll soon learn which you prefer for different commands. The real benefit here is that you get access to both systems in a single speaker, including their full range of supported smart home devices. So if you find it easier to use Google Assistant with your Nest Thermostat, but Alexa for two-way talk on your Ring doorbell, you can do exactly that. You get the best of both worlds.

• Features score: 4.5/5

(Image credit: Future) JBL Authentics 200 review: Design

• Heritage design featuring a Quadrex grill and aluminium frame
• Physical controls include volume, treble and bass dials
• Made from mostly recycled materials

In a market of muted designs, the JBL Authentics 200 stands out for all the right reasons. It’s rare to see smart home tech designed with flair these days (although the Edifier D32 wireless speaker is one other example), so the JBL's mid-century style is certainly refreshing. Taking more than a few cues from vintage amps, the Authentics 200 is a gorgeous bit of kit. Its curved foam frontage, aluminium frame and leather-like skin all leans into the heritage aesthetic, without looking out of place in a contemporary kitchen.

Measuring 266.3 x 171.7 x 167.4mm, it strikes an ideal balance between physical presence and ease of placement. Its bigger sibling, the Atmos-compatible Authentics 500, is an altogether more substantial thing. With its mid-size footprint, the Authentics 200 will easily find a home in most rooms.

Build quality feels deserving of the price tag too: this is a robust unit and a relatively weighty one at 3.12kg. It’s all suitably solid and well put-together, standing firm on rubber feet which reduce vibrations from the downward-firing radiator. In a perfect world, we wish JBL had used metal instead of plastic for the control panel and dials which live on top of the unit. But that’s the only part which feels anything less than premium.

Among those controls you’ll find illuminating treble and bass knobs, as well as a volume dial with a play/pause button at its centre. These give you the kind of hands-on audio control that isn’t offered by many smart speakers. While you can make the same adjustments in the app, we found something refreshingly tactile about being able to physically tweak the EQ.

Beneath the Bluetooth button is another with a heart on it. This works as a shortcut to a playlist on a supported music streaming service, configured in the JBL One app. There’s also a microphone mute switch hidden on the back of the unit, for privacy when you need it.

• Design score: 4.5/5

(Image credit: Future) JBL Authentics 200 review: Sound quality

• 2x 25mm tweeters, 5-inch woofer, 6-inch passive radiator
• Automatic audio calibration on power-up
• Customizable EQ settings in the JBL One app

Little about the stature of the Authentics 200 hints at how well it fills a room. With two tweeters, a full-range woofer and downward-firing passive radiator at its disposal, this is a speaker with real punch. Bass is particularly noteworthy, with a huge amount of energy available at the low end. Even with the bass knob at halfway, the Authentics 200 has rumble to spare.

But it’s not just the power that surprises, so much as the depth and separation that the Authentics 200 is capable of. We were blown away by the breadth of the soundstage, with instrumentation given real space to breathe. Throughout our time with the Authentics 200, we found ourselves noticing details in songs that would be lost on lesser speakers. You’d need to pair up a second unit for a real sense of stereo, but in every other respect, the depth here is impressive.

Top-end clarity is underpinned by a lovely weight to the mids. There’s a real richness in the midrange, which feels deftly balanced for definition. Altogether, the impression is one of fullness. From The XX and alt-J to Norah Jones to the Arctic Monkeys, there wasn’t a genre that stumped the Authentics 200. Whether gritty electronic beats, twangy lead guitar or stripped-back vocals, there’s a real richness to the sound, without sacrificing any detail.

All of the comments above are based on the default EQ setting. According to JBL, the Authentics 200 self-calibrates every time it powers up, and it certainly suited every room we used it in. Besides the physical treble and bass controls on the unit itself, you can customise EQ settings via the JBL One app. This is a nice option to have, although in our experience, the Authentics 200 did best when left to its own devices.

You don’t get the vertical component of an Atmos speaker such as the Amazon Echo Studio, while the cheaper Sonos Era 100 is equally engaging, albeit with less oomph. But for its size and price, we think the Authentics 200 is bang on the money.

• Sound quality: 5/5

(Image credit: Future) JBL Authentics 200 review: Value

Seen as a smart speaker, there’s no escaping that the JBL Authentics 200 is pricier than most. If you’re mainly in the market for a voice assistant in your home, there are much cheaper ways to get that. The Amazon Echo Dot (5th Gen), for example, costs just $49.99 / £54.99 / AU$79. Similarly, the Google Nest Mini will set you back only $49.99 / £49 / AU$79.

There are also wireless speakers with high-quality audio available for less. The $199.99 / £179.99 (so about AU$300) Edifier D32 is a fine example that also has a retro aesthetic – although the build-quality isn't quite as premium-feel as the JBL model. 

What those value comparisons don’t account for is the individuality of the Authentics 200. With its solid build and vintage design, it stands apart among home speakers, smart or otherwise. The quality of its sound output blew us away in testing, while the flexibility to connect with both Alexa and Google Assistant is a real boon. Plus you get a generous set of streaming features and useful app connectivity. So while it might not be a bargain, if you buy into its vintage aesthetic, we think you’re getting a good deal.

• Value score: 4/5

(Image credit: Future) Should I buy the JBL Authentics 200? Buy it if… Don’t buy it if… JBL Authentics 200 review: also consider How I tested the JBL Authentics 200

• Tested for a month in a number of rooms
• Played a variety of genres at different volumes
• Listened via Spotify app on iPhone and Mac

I used the JBL Authentics 200 as my primary home speaker for more than a month. It split its time between the kitchen and living room, giving me a good impression of how well it adapts to different spaces.

I challenged the Authentics 200 with a whole spectrum of musical genres, from electronic to acoustic, soul to rock and roll. I also tested it with different treble and bass settings, and at different volume levels – from Sunday-morning mellow to loud enough to get a text from the upstairs neighbours.

The Authentics 200 also served as my default smart speaker during testing, connected to both Google Assistant and Alexa. That meant asking it to cue up playlists, hit me with my morning routine and generally field any queries which came to mind (usually recipe related).

Read more about how we test

• First reviewed: October 2024

Iniu B61 10000mAh power bank

The Iniu B61 is a compact power bank with multiple USB ports and 22W of power, allowing you to charge three devices at once. Thanks to its lean design, it’s also easy to carry, fitting in your pocket comfortably without weighing you down.

For a 10,000mAh power bank, the Iniu B61 is very small and light. It’s only a few grams heavier than the Anker PowerCore 10000 Redux, and that bank only has two USB ports.

Overall, the Iniu B61 cuts a smart and inconspicuous figure. The harshness of the black colorway is softened somewhat by its rounded contours. It may be a little on the thick side, but it’s justified given its capacity, as not even the best power banks can beat it in this regard.

The matte rubberized finish is smooth to the touch. It also seems quite resistant to scratches, which is an auspicious indicator for its long-term prospects. However, the joins aren’t the most solid, as I did notice some play between the front and back parts of the chassis, but this is a minor gripe rather than a serious concern.

The plastic display appears hard-wearing, although it’s unnecessarily large, given it only ever displays the battery percentage. The Anker MagGo 10K for instance, has a much smaller screen, but displays additional information, including estimated charging times.

The Iniu B61 comes with a phone stand that slides out from underneath, allowing you to easily view your device while charging. However, I didn’t find the mechanism is a little on the flimsy side, and I’m not sure it would withstand the rigours of constant travel.

The USB-C port supports the PD 3.0 standard, so fast charging is possible. It managed to charge my Google Pixel 7a from 50-100% in just over two hours. The USB-A ports, on the other hand, support QC 4+. Charging this way is also fast, but inevitably not as quick, topping up the Pixel 7a from half to full in about an hour and a half.

In both cases, the battery of the Iniu B61 drained by about 30%, which means you should be able to get at least a couple of charges out of it. Charging the bank itself takes about two hours from half to full.

This puts it roughly on a par with other 10,000mAh power banks. It pretty much equals the USB-C charging performance of the Anker MagGo 10k, which is considerably more expensive than the Iniu B61.

As the world moves closer to wholesale USB-C adoption, I would’ve preferred to have seen two USB-C ports instead of two USB-A ports, and the lack of wireless charging is also a shame given the Iniu B61 is the ideal size to slot behind your phone.

However, it’s hard to complain at this price point, since power banks from Anker are usually more expensive, and while they tend to provide more features, they don’t offer greater charging speeds. Ultimately, the Iniu B61 is good value for those in the market for a versatile and travel-friendly power bank.

(Image credit: Future) Iniu B61 10000mAh power bank review: price & specs

(Image credit: Future) Should I buy the Iniu B61 10000mAh power bank? Buy it if…

You want to charge multiple devices at once
Three ports means three-way simultaneous charging, although as expected, charging speeds will suffer.

You want something portable
Given its capacity, the Iniu B61 is surprisingly light and slender, making it a great travel companion.

Don't buy it if…

You want wireless charging
There’s no wireless charging capability on the Iniu B61, which is a shame given its form factor.

You mainly have USB-C devices
You might be put off if most of your devices are USB-C, which is the way the world is going.

Iniu B61 10000mAh power bank review: Also consider

Anker PowerCore 10000 Redux
Adopting a pill-shape as opposed to the typical flat rectangle design of most power banks, the PowerCore 10000 Redux has a keen focus on portability. It also comes with a carrying handle and a USB-C-to-A adapter attached to the included charging cable. It’s marginally lighter than the Iniu B61, yet offers the same 10,000mAh capacity. However, it has two USB ports rather than three, despite being about the same price as the Iniu B61. View Deal

Huawei MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition: two-minute review

The Huawei MatePad Pro PaperMatte edition is a tablet aimed at creatives, with an emphasis on illustration, thanks in no small part to the Tandem OLED PaperMatte display.

The display is indeed impressive: it’s vibrant while at the same time being easy on the eye. Video, photos, drawing and text are all equally displayed vividly and clearly. There’s a slight graininess and soft-focus effect to the picture, but I didn’t find either detracted from the experience.

The gold finish on the PaperMatte Edition is subtle with a scratchy pattern that might not be to everyone’s taste. However, I found it suited the overall design well. I was also impressed by the build quality, which is up there with some of the best tablets, with every panel and join being close to perfect. The power and volume buttons are also of a similarly high standard.

The Glide Keyboard case, however, is more of a mixed bag. While it fits well onto the MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition, opening and closing it is difficult, thanks to the extra hinge mechanism that’s necessary to house the M-Pencil 3 charging compartment. It was always awkward to open and close. And while the keys and trackpad feel premium, the material around them appears to show signs of peeling, which spells trouble for its longevity. The case also fails to protect the camera.

One of the major issues with the MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition, though, is related to software. Google’s lack of support for Huawei devices means its apps aren’t natively supported, requiring workarounds that are hit and miss in their success. While I was able to get Google apps installed via GBox, they didn’t always perform as expected, and games failed to work outright. Huawei’s official storefront is frankly no substitute for the Google Play Store, as it’s severely limited in scope.

Huawei’s own apps included here can be quite useful and perform well. GoPaint and Petal Clip are very well designed creative apps, with the former letting the M-Pencil 3 shine. However, others have their issues (outrightly failing to work in the case of the Music app).

Gestures both on the touchscreen and on the trackpad are responsive and allow for useful functionality. Typing with the Glide Keyboard is fine, although some software issues hamper the experience. Air Gestures, however, failed to work consistently enough to be useful at all. The M-Pencil 3 stylus offers the most enjoyable way to interact with the tablet: it provides smooth, seamless strokes and although there’s a slight dragging sensation, it isn’t enough to detract from its natural feel.

Battery life on the MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition is impressive, lasting several days from general and varied use. Super charging is also available, getting you back up and running relatively quickly: it took me about two hours to get from 5% to full capacity.

Huawei devices are always tricky to recommend. Due to the unique restrictions placed upon the Chinese brand, the MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition doesn’t function like your typical Android tablet, with various app restrictions being enforced. However, if you can get past that, or you only want to spill your creative expressions onto a glorious display, then this might be for you. However, at this price, it’s hard to recommend it wholeheartedly given its various foibles.

(Image credit: Future) Huawei MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition review: price and availability

• £799 (about $1,069 / AU$1,553)
• PaperMatte edition is gold only
• Same price as the latest iPad Air

The MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition costs £799 (about $1,069 / AU$1,553) and only comes in gold. There’s also a non-PaperMatte edition in black, with a lower capacity (256GB rather than 512GB), for £699. Both versions include the Glide Keyboard. Huawei is currently offering UK customers a promotion of £100 off, as well as a free inclusion of the M-Pencil 3, on its own storefront.

Compared to the best tablets around, the MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition sits somewhere in the middle in terms of price. iPad Pro models can certainly be more expensive, but they do pack in far greater power. And the latest iPad Air 13-inch starts at the same price as the MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition, although that model will only get you 128GB of storage, and all only have 8GB of RAM.

In the wider realm of Android tablets, again the MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition occupies the center ground. Samsung Galaxy tabs can exceed the MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition in price, but there are also budget offerings, such as the OnePlus Pad Go, although this model isn’t compatible with a stylus, nor is there an official keyboard case for it.

Huawei MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition review: specs

(Image credit: Future) Huawei MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition review: display

• Vivid and clear
• No glare
• Slightly grainy texture

The 12.2-inch OLED PaperMatte display is very clear, making it easy to read text and view colorful imagery. However, there is a slight graininess to the finish, which becomes more apparent the closer you are. There’s also a slightly softer focus compared to other tablet displays, meaning it isn’t as pinpoint sharp.

Personally, though, I found it to be vibrant enough to view HD and 2K content without issue, thanks in part to its 2800 x 1840 resolution. Reading text is very easy on the eye, thanks to the PaperMatte technology and its high contrast, lack of harsh backlighting (despite the 2,000 nits maximum brightness) and slight softness to the rendering. The matte finish also means glare isn’t a problem for the MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition; no matter where I tried it, it would always present a visible image.

The bezels are also very thin, with the display making full use of its allotted real estate. There’s also a distinct lack of smudging, as fingerprints leave next to no trace, as they can on other tablet displays.

The screen is silky smooth to the touch, with finger swipes being effortless to perform. The same is true when using Huawei’s M-Pencil 3: scribbling and drawing with it is a joy, although there is the slightest hint of scratchiness at times but not enough to ruin the experience. Overall, strokes are fluid and precise – thanks in part to the 144Hz refresh rate – and register exactly where you want them to.

• Display score: 4 / 5

(Image credit: Future) Huawei MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition review: design

• Unique gold finish
• Thin but relatively heavy
• Awkward Glide Keyboard folding mechanism

The MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition sports a minimal design, fairly typical of most tablets. Its gold finish has a scratch-mark pattern that may divide opinion, but I don’t think it’s too garish. Overall, the fit and finish is excellent, and I spotted no flaws in the construction, while the buttons feel premium and operate with precision and ease.

In the hand, you do feel the weight of the MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition, but it’s still just about within reasonable bounds; you shouldn’t have a problem carrying it for long stretches. However, the edges are quite sharp, making it uncomfortable to hold, so this is a tablet better used on a desktop.

The profile of the MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition is very thin, which adds to its portability credentials. The same is true even with the Glide Keyboard attached, which is equally as slender. That slenderness, however, comes at the detriment to the camera, as the lenses protrude slightly beyond the bounds of the Glide’s case, offering them no protection against slams or drops.

Perhaps the biggest weakness of the Glide Keyboard, though, is its folding mechanism. There’s a slot to accommodate and charge the M-Pencil 3 that features a double-hinge array, so when folded flat, the stylus is stowed away safely. However, that hinge is very stiff and needs to be opened up for the tablet to sit upright when in use. This makes for awkward opening and closing and, even after a week with it, I still couldn’t operate it smoothly.

The Glide Keyboard magnet that holds the MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition upright offers two viewing angles. While it’s strong, a word to the wise: when laying down, make sure your knees aren’t too high if you plan on resting the tablet on them, otherwise the weight of the tablet will force it shut.

Although the Glide Keyboard is well made for the most part, the material around the keyboard itself didn’t feel premium, and even appeared to be losing adhesion, as air pockets were visible beneath it in places, which doesn’t bode well for its durability. The trackpad, though, is smooth and durable, and just the right size to be practical without eating into the keyboard real estate.

The M-Pencil 3 is also well designed, taking cues from the Apple Pencil with its all-white finish and indentation on one side. As well as being stored in its aforementioned slot in the Glide Keyboard, it also clips magnetically to the top of the MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition, although it won’t charge in this position. This is far from convenient, as retrieving the M-Pencil 3 from the charging slot is awkward: you can either fish around the back of the tablet while it’s standing upright, or prise up the bottom from its magnetic hold to retrieve it. These are both less than elegant solutions.

• Design score: 3 / 5

Huawei MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition review: software

• Creative native apps
• Some glitches
• Support for popular apps problematic

The selection of pre-installed software on the MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition verges on excessive, but the hit to performance and storage capacity is thankfully negligible, and isn’t as bad as the bloatware present on other Android tablets.

Huawei’s own suite of apps on the MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition is, unsurprisingly, catered to the artistically minded, geared towards getting the most out of the M-Pencil 3. GoPaint is one of the standouts, despite being hidden away in a folder on the second page of the home screen. Anyone who’s dabbled with Procreate will be in familiar territory here, as it offers a near-identical interface and feature-set.

There are also two notes-based apps: Notes and Notepad. These allow for more drawing and scribbling, and come with some useful templates, including even music staves. However, if you’re looking to type your notes, then neither of these apps are fit for purpose, with a measly text box tool being your option. Considering the abundance of third-party note taking apps out there, though, this isn’t much of a problem.

There’s also Petal Clip, a surprisingly in-depth photo and video editing app. This allows you to create animations from images and from videos, with various adjustments, filters and animations to play around with. There are also templates for creating short clips, mainly themed around romance for some reason, but are effective nonetheless for effortlessly livening up content.

Disappointingly the browser app is pretty basic, even lacking common keyboard shortcuts many will be accustomed to. Still, sites do load promptly and general speed isn’t far behind more popular variants. Huawei’s other first-party apps fared less well during my time with the tablet, with glitches occurring frequently. The Music app, for instance, refused to play any music and kept crashing every time I tried to do so.

The real drawback of Huawei devices, though, is the lack of native compatibility with Google and many other apps, due to western sanctions on the Chinese brand. Huawei does have its own AppGallery storefront, but the lineup is sparse, and the Google apps it offers are not the true apps; instead, they run on a platform that essentially loads their mobile site counterparts.

There are various repositories available from which you can install Google and other apps absent from Huawei’s ecosystem, but I had limited success with these, as many refused to install or run, or instead ran but stopped working shortly afterwards.

GBox proved to be the best solution to circumvent these restrictions. This is an environment that claims to get Google apps working on Huawei devices. Once I downloaded the app from the GBox website, I was able to install and use the Google Play Store, along with all the Android apps you know and love.

However, even here, apps downloaded via this method aren’t flawless. In Google Docs, for instance, I was unable to scroll pages, with the typical two-fingered drags resulting in highlighting text instead. Spellcheck as you type also appeared to be missing, and there were times when single taps of the space bar failed to actually create a space. These drawbacks really hamper productivity.

More generally, some apps refused to appear on the home screen once downloaded from the Google Play Store. Also, various games I installed from the Play Store failed to work, either instructing me to download them from the device’s official app store (where they weren’t available), or that a store key was missing.

Also, Google Chrome isn’t available from GBox either. You can download it via the Google Play Store, but after installing, it again requests installing from the AppGallery – and, again, Chrome isn’t on there.

Another issue is that split-screen functionality isn’t available between two apps downloaded from GBox (or the Google Play Store via GBox). You can split a screen between a GBox app and a non-Gbox app, but it's a serious setback to those who want to focus on productivity that two GBox apps can’t be stacked side-by-side.

What does work better, though, is floating windows. I found that any app could be turned into a floating window, allowing you to put it in the corner and keep it on top while other apps are open, or minimize it to a small tab at the side of the screen, ready to be expanded again. Floating windows also offer a workaround for apps that only support portrait mode, as it allows you to view them the right way up in landscape – you won’t be able to make them fullscreen, but you can still resize them to a large degree.

• Software score: 2.5 / 5

(Image credit: Future) Huawei MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition review: performance

• Great for creativity
• So-so productivity credentials
• Gestures are a mixed bag

In terms of speed, the Huawei MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition is plenty powerful enough to handle light productivity, entertainment and creativity tasks. The Kirin T91 Octa-core chip and 12GB of RAM make for seamless performance for the most part, with only the occasional slowdown. Google Docs and Sheets were swift when creating and editing in these apps, while streaming video on Twitch, Youtube and Netflix was also a close to flawless experience.

The sound quality was also a pleasant surprise. As with most tablets, it won’t blow you away, but audio on the MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition was more impactful than I was expecting, creating an admirable sense of space. It also rendered all frequencies clearly while keeping distortion at bay.

When I did manage to install games that actually worked, they performed well too. PUBG Mobile ran smoothly, albeit at a low frame rate and with compromised graphics, but it was still perfectly playable. There was no discernible lag or stuttering, and the MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition didn’t heat up in the process either.

Typing is mostly a pleasant experience on the Glide Keyboard, thanks to the wide keys and damped feel. On screen, however, there are few issues. The cursor doesn't move forward when you press space, although a space is registered once you continue typing, which can be a little disconcerting. There were also occasions where the predictive dialog box obscured the screen. And despite what I did to change the keyboard layout, the @ symbol was nearly always mapped to the quote marks key, rather than the 2 key.

The usual trackpad gestures are present. You can swipe with two and three fingers to perform various actions, from navigating menus and pages to switching apps and returning to the home screen. You can also zoom by performing a pinching movement. However, I was disappointed at being unable to drag items around by merely tapping the trackpad; instead, you have to press down the trackpad first before you can drag, which is far less practical when moving items large distances across the screen.

Some mouse gestures also fail to emulate their touchscreen counterparts with the same effectiveness. For instance, opening the multitask view by swiping inwards from the right on the trackpad did several times result in me going back on the web page I had open at the same time, which is more than inconvenient.

As for those touchscreen gestures, they work more seamlessly. They are responsive and smooth, and there are some unique gestures available too. Along with the usual two and three finger actions, there are also knuckle taps, a handy addition that allow you to take screenshots or perform other actions which are configurable in the settings. Again, these work accurately and seamlessly.

The same can’t be said about Air Gestures, however, which are meant to recognize the opening and closing of your hand in front of the camera to perform certain actions. Most of the time, though, I failed to get these to work, no matter where I positioned my hand.

• Performance score: 3.5 / 5

(Image credit: Future) Huawei MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition review: battery

• Several days of use
• Quick charging
• ePaper tablets have it beat, though

The Huawei MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition features a 5,000 mAh battery, which is impressively long lasting. During my tests, it went for several days while performing typical user tasks. In comparison, the latest iPad Air lasted eleven and a half hours according to our tests, although that figure halved when dealing with more intense tasks. Charging the MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition is a quick process too, thanks to its super charging feature. Charging from 5% to 100% took about two hours.

If you really want something that will last, the reMarkable Paper Pro can go for two whole weeks between charges. That is an ePaper tablet, though, explicitly designed for reading and note-taking, and not much else.

• Battery score: 4 / 5

Should you buy the Huawei MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition? Buy it if…

You want to draw
The optional M-Pencil 3 is very responsive and smooth, making it a joy to get creative with the MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition.

You want a clear display
The PaperMatte display is vivid and clear, making it easy to read text and watch video content.

Don’t buy it if…

You want good app availability
Google and many other apps don’t work natively on the Huawei devices, and the workarounds are far from perfect.

You want powerhouse performance
Although it's perfectly capable of servicing your everyday needs, those after more productivity pedigree may want to look elsewhere.

Huawei MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition: Also consider

Apple iPad Air 13-inch (2024)
For the same price as the MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition, you could get the entry-level model of the latest 13-inch iPad Air. You’ll only get 8GB of RAM and 128GB of storage, but in our Apple iPad Air 13-inch (2024) review, we noted its incredible performance across all areas, including creative and artistic workloads. Plus, you also get access to Apple’s excellent app selection and ecosystem. If you already have an iPhone, an iPad certainly makes more sense for cross-platform functionality.

OnePlus Pad Go
If you’re after a budget-friendly tablet and don’t intend on using a stylus, the OnePlus Pad Go is a worthy choice. Performance is very good at this price, and it doesn't suffer from the same Google app compatibility issue as Huawei products. The display is super sharp for viewing content with ease, but, as we noted in our OnePlus Pad Go review, it can be quite reflective, making darker images hard to see. There’s no official keyboard case available for it either.

How I tested the Huawei MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition

• Tested for one week
• Tried preinstalled and third-party apps
• Performed various tasks

I tested the MatePad Pro PaperMatte Edition for one week. During that time, I performed various tasks, including general browsing, light productivity, and gaming. I used it with and without the Glide Keyboard.

I made sure to try out as many of its features as I could, from the preinstalled apps to its overall functionality. I tried where I could use third-party apps, although this proved difficult at times due to the restrictions in place over Google apps on Huawei devices.

One aspect I was unable to test was its screen mirroring and projection capabilities, since these are only compatible with certain Huawei and Honor devices running HarmonyOS, EMUI 10 or Magic UI 3 or later.

Read more about how we test.

First reviewed October 2024

Ugreen 10,000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank review

Anyone on the hunt for a power bank will have likely come across Ugreen, a relatively new Chinese brand looking to wrest Anker’s grip on the sector, with its plentiful offerings at budget-friendly prices.

Just like Anker’s wireless power banks, the Ugreen 10,000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank is simple and to the point. Two colorways are available: black and white. Every side of the unit is smooth and flat, free from any protrusions or indentations. And the only interface comes in the form of a series of LED lights, indicating battery levels and charging status.

For a wireless power bank with a large capacity, the Ugreen 10,000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank is pleasingly light and lean like the best power banks, making it relatively easy to carry around. However, with an iPhone attached, I found it was still too bulky to pocket with ease – although I’ve yet to encounter a 10,000mAh wireless power bank that isn’t.

The Ugreen 10,000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank can wirelessly charge the best iPhones thanks to its MagSafe compatibility, offering 15W of power. During my tests, it was able to charge an iPhone 13 Pro from 50% to 100% in under two hours, draining the bank’s battery by somewhere between 25-50%, as indicated by the loss of one of the four LED dots.

Wired charging via the single USB-C port is more powerful at 20W. I managed to charge a Google Pixel 7a from 50% to 100% in just over an hour, with the Ugreen 10,000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank again losing one dot in the process. Charging the bank itself from empty to full took about two and a half hours, which is reasonable, roughly equal to the charging time of the Anker MagGo (10K).

The durability of the charging pad material is questionable. During my tests of the 5,000mAh variant, the pad began to show signs of wear. Since this is the same material, I have my concerns about this model's durability as well. It’s also fond of picking up fluff and other debris, which I haven't found with the materials on other MagSafe power banks, such as those offered by Anker.

The Ugreen 10,000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank costs $49 / £49 (about AU$72), which undercuts the Anker MagGo Power Bank (10K) by a considerable margin. However, that bank does appear to have greater durability, owing to its hard charging pad material. Some variants also get a useful digital display, with precise battery levels and charging time estimations, making them an all-round better pick than the Ugreen 10,000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank.

(Image credit: Future) Ugreen 10,000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank review: Price & specs

(Image credit: Future) Should I buy the Ugreen 10,000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank? Buy it if…

You need a large yet practical power bank
For a 10,000mAh power bank, the Ugreen is surprisingly light and slender. But like all wireless banks this size, you’ll still struggle to fit it in your pocket with an iPhone attached.

You’re on a budget
Ugreen seems to be on a mission to undercut Anker at every turn, so if you’re on a tight budget, the Ugreen 10,000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank could be tempting.

Don't buy it if…

You want something durable
The silicone pad doesn’t seem to be the most durable, so you may want a harder-wearing alternative.

You have an Android
While there are MagSafe-compatible cases for Android phones, they still don’t officially support Apple’s standard, so don’t be surprised if the Ugreen 10,000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank won’t charge your device.

Ugreen 10,000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank review: Also consider

Anker MagGo Power Bank (10k)
A more feature-rich alternative, the Anker MagGo has 15W wireless and 27W wired charging power, as well as a digital display showing the bank’s battery percentage and estimated charging times. It also comes with a folding stand, allowing you to view your iPhone in landscape or portrait easily while charging. It is slightly heavier than the Ugreen 10,000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank, though, and it’s considerably more expensive.View Deal

Reolink Doorbell (Battery): one-minute review

The Reolink Doorbell (Battery) is a wireless video doorbell that's solidly built and works without a subscription, but has a few drawbacks when it comes to video latency and smart home compatibility.

The built quality of the Reolink Doorbell (Battery) impresses as soon as you take it out of the box. Reolink has years of experience making external security cameras (including the recently launched Reolink Altas PT), and has brought that experience to bear on this product.

It feels substantial and purposeful when compared to something like the Aqara video doorbell G4 or the Ring Battery video doorbell Plus with its wafer-thin metal front cover. Superior weather protection is most welcome here in the UK, especially if you have a front entrance exposed to the elements.

It boasts a feature set that we've come to expect from the best video doorbells, including package detection, head-to-toe field of view, night vision, and 2K resolution. Plus, unlike some competing products, it works subscription-free; there is no need to store your video in the cloud as you can keep it on a microSD card within the unit (purchased separately).

With its rechargeable battery and Wi-Fi capabilities, installation can be as simple as downloading the app to your phone, drilling two holes, and attaching the doorbell to the door or wall. Reolink produces a range of devices including security cameras, hubs and network video recorders, and the lineage of this battery-powered doorbell is easy to trace.

However, The Reolink Doorbell (Battery) misses the mark in a few key areas; it has limited home automation connectivity and a slow and unreliable connection between the app and the doorbell, plus it’s easily removed from the wall.

(Image credit: Les Watson) Reolink Doorbell (Battery): price and availability

• List price: $145.99 / £159.99 / AU$186.99
• Chimes and smart hub sold separately

The Reolink Doorbell (Battery) launched in September 2024 for $145.99 / £159.99 / AU$186.99, and at the time of writing the company is holding a sale that knocks around 10% off its list price. It can be bought direct from Reolink's online store (which ships worldwide) or from Amazon.

There are also Reolink chimes that let you hear the doorbell easily from anywhere in your home. These cost $19.99 / £23.99 / AU$49.99 each.

Reolink offers a compatible hub for $99.99 / £99.99 / AU$199.99, but I was disappointed that the brand’s solar panels do not appear compatible with the doorbell. It's also not clear how to hardwire the doorbell if you do not have an existing doorbell circuit.

Reolink Doorbell (Battery): specs Reolink Doorbell (Battery): design

• Sleek and attractive design
• Battery is not removable

The Reolink Doorbell (Battery) is a pill-shaped device topped by the camera and sensor housing with a sizeable round button on the lower half. It’s simple and unobtrusive, opting for a less boxy form factor than the market-leading Ring doorbells have to offer. It’s robustly built with long-term outdoor use in mind but has a few quirks that make it a less-than-optimal choice for some households.

It's possible to tell quite a lot about a product and the company that produces it from the box that it comes in. I like a good box, and appreciate the time and effort required to design it; Reolink 'gives good box'.

The manual with readable text larger than that found on microfilm impressed me, but the paper template for drilling the holes in your door/wall is a curious inclusion. If you can't figure out where the holes need to go using the provided plates and screws I would suggest that you put the tools down, hold your hands aloft, and step away from the power drill.

The USB-C charge port is sensibly placed about halfway up the back of the doorbell under a protective rubber flap. Lifting the flap also revealed the MicroSD port into which I inserted a spare card and the supplied USB-C cable.

(Image credit: Les Watson)

I admired the nicely illuminated doorbell button and then…

“Welcome to Reolink, please install the Reolink app and scan the QR code on the camera,” said the nice lady on the doorbell.

“No thank you, I am going to bed now,” said I, but the doorbell had other ideas. “Willkommen bei Reolink, bitte installieren Sie die Reolink-App und scannen Sie den QR-Code auf der Kamera“, sagte die nette Dame an der Türklingel.

I replied to the now very annoying lady using all of the four-letter Anglo Saxon words I could think of, hoping that it would shut up after a while, but no - it repeated the same message in six languages again and again and again. Further frustration ensued when I searched for a QR code to scan since the message did not specify “scan the QR code from within the app”.

Eventually, I found the rather hidden power button and consulted the manual to find that it needed holding down for a few seconds to power down. All the while the doorbell is bellowing like a Eurovision score round. Who thought all of that was a good idea?

Installing the doorbell in battery mode after charging it was simple enough, but I did notice that the mounting plate does not allow for powered installation where a power cable does not present itself directly behind the doorbell. It’s unlikely that existing doorbell wiring will be at the correct height, let alone the right location, meaning the power wire will most likely need to enter the unit from one side or the other and there are no slots in the mounting plate to allow for this.

The two major design flaws are the non-removable rechargeable battery and the ease with which the doorbell can be removed from the wall. I appreciate that using widely available removable rechargeable batteries restricts design choices, but everything else about the doorbell is built to last except for the battery.

Far worse is the ease with which the doorbell can be removed from the mounting plate. Yes, Reolink provides a sturdy removal tool, but you can remove it with a paperclip and, more worryingly, you can also remove the MicroSD card.

Reolink Doorbell (Battery): performance

• Mobile app is easy to navigate, but a little clunky
• Connecting to doorbell via app is slow
• Battery life is shorter than many other doorbells

As much as I like the build quality and Reolink’s attention to detail, it has to be said that connecting to the doorbell through the application is very slow. While the app is uncluttered and easy to navigate, some of the settings could be labeled more clearly. For instance, why are the video quality settings called 'Clear', 'Balanced' and 'Fluent', especially when the onscreen icon uses the unpretentious 'High', 'Mid' and 'Low' descriptors?

Drawing the privacy mask for your location is a pain, as you can’t see exactly what you’re doing when your comparatively large finger is blocking the screen. Reviewing video is also a bit clunky as it only displays the current day’s captures. If you want to see what happened the previous day you need to change the date and then wait for it to load.

The doorbell has been designed to conserve the battery wherever possible by only capturing video when the unit detects movement. This is a laudable design principle but as is often the case, it affects the performance; its standby mode leads to a longer connection time as it boots up. Two or three seconds is the usual connection period on other video doorbells and cameras that I have experienced, but the Reolink takes 5-10 seconds. Occasionally, it does not connect at all, which is very frustrating.

The seeds of doubt germinate as the battery also doesn't seem to last as long as the other doorbells that I have tested. The Reolink website states “the 7,000mAh built-in battery provides up to five months of protection,” although they do caveat that this conclusion is based on testing “under lab conditions with 20 triggers per day, each recording lasting eight seconds.” I'm willing to accept that the battery won’t last quite so long once I have finished my testing, but five months is, at best, optimistic.

(Image credit: Les Watson)

Reolink provides software for both Windows and OSX which is commendable; I spend most of my day at the computer and interacting with the doorbell through the phone app is less than ideal. It’s much easier to see the video output on a larger screen and the aliasing is not such an issue when the camera quality is set to high (or 'Fluent'). It goes some way toward redemption for having such limited home automation capabilities. The night vision is darker than on other doorbells which is a bit of a double-edged sword. It is sometimes difficult to see what has been captured, but on the other hand, it does not trigger unnecessarily when the security light on the house opposite lights up like other doorbells I’ve tested.

I have mixed feelings, ultimately, about the Reolink doorbell (battery). I want to believe in this product but at its price and with its software being so middling, it’s likely to be a somewhat disappointing purchase.

Should you buy the Reolink Doorbell (Battery)? Buy it if

You want a quick and easy way to add a video doorbell

If like me, you do not have an existing chime in your house, battery-powered video doorbells are a quick and easy solution.

You have other Reolink devices but their hard-wired doorbell is not suitable

The Reolink doorbell battery will work with the Reolink hub, Reolink Network Video Recorder and other Reolink security cameras.

You want a subscription-free device

Most other video doorbells either have limited storage capacities or constantly capture the video stream which fills the storage up (or both). The Reolink supports MicroSD cards up to 256GB and only captures video when movement is detected. In theory, this should mean that you will have video that goes back a long way.

Don't buy it if

You use Apple HomeKit

There are options available (like Homebridge) that can usually allow you to easily include non-Homekit devices in your Apple home via a plugin or other ecosystems like Samsung SmartThings. Reolink’s limited home automation options make that difficult.

You need to investigate every notification

The slow response will annoy and the battery will drain quickly.

You are concerned about porch security

If you live in an area where you think someone might have the bright idea to remove, steal and reset your video doorbell, avoid this easily swiped device.

Reolink Doorbell (Battery): also consider

Ring Video Doorbell Pro 2

The Ring Video Doorbell Pro 2 is a premium video doorbell that not only looks the part, but offers a wider field of view and sharp video quality. It is, unfortunately, wired only and is pricey as well, though it often goes on sale since it’s a bit older.

Read our full Ring Video Doorbell Pro 2 review

Eufy Video Doorbell 2K (Wireless)

While the Eufy Video Doorbell 2K (Wireless) doesn’t have HDR, it still has that sharp 2K resolution, not to mention it’s a little less expensive than the Philips. It also can be used without a subscription, though one is on offer. This model is wireless only.

Read our full Eufy Video Doorbell 2K (Wireless) review

How I tested the Reolink Doorbell (Battery)

• I tested the phone application and OSX application
• I tested package recognition
• I compared response times and video output to other smart video doorbells
• I attempted to add it to Google Home
• I attempted to add it to Apple HomeKit using Homebridge
• I accessed the doorbell remotely via 4G and Wi-Fi

The test environment consisted of three smart doorbells (including the Reolink) all connected to the same Wi-Fi network. All doorbells were accessed via their accompanying applications during the testing for this review. The contents of the MicroSD cards were compared for file size and capture frequency (how often the doorbell captures video). The attempts to connect to Google Home and Apple HomeKit via Homebridge were time-limited to an hour each.

The drawback of the 'only capture when detecting movement' paradigm is that it is not possible to review the whole day's video to investigate detection misfires or failures. The privacy mask seemed to work really well, for example, but conversely, maybe it was not picking up everything that it should. Still, I checked to my best ability when I knew there was outside activity and by acting out my own doorbell-ringing scenarios.

I’ve been using smart home devices for several years now, and have a whopping 30+ years of tech enthusiasm and experience under my belt. Read more about how we test.

First reviewed November 2024

Anker 3-in-1 Cube with MagSafe review

The Anker 3-in-1 Cube with MagSafe may leave some reeling at its expensive $129.99 / £129.95 / AU$299.95 price tag. However, this brand is a reliable name that’s known for its quality products, so even a penny pincher like myself has come around to this chonky charging companion.

First of all, I loved how secure my phone felt when attached to this stand. The adjustable viewing angle came in very handy, the hinge felt strong and just stiff enough to hold my phone at the angle I wanted. It was really easy to change my phone from portrait to landscape too, making it a delightful desk companion whether I was scrolling through emails or watching YouTube.

This MagSafe charger offers 15W charging power. When tested with an iPhone 13 Pro, the Anker 3-in-1 Cube took two hours and fifteen minutes to charge it from 0%-100%, which is a fairly average charging time compared to the multitude of wireless charging stands I’ve tested.

There’s a satisfying little press-and-pull pop-out platform on the right-hand side of the cube that holds the Apple Watch charger. When in the popped-out position, the platform felt easily movable so I was concerned that the internal attachment may be a little flimsy, although it didn’t pose any problems during testing.

It took the Anker 3-in-1 Cube just an hour and fifteen minutes to charge my Apple Watch Series 9, which was only eleven minutes slower than the fastest Apple Watch charger I’ve tested to date, achieved by the impressive – albeit much larger-sized – Anker MagGo Wireless Charging Station 3-in-1 Stand. I was really pleased to discover that the rear wireless AirPod charging pad also worked great for juicing up a pair of wireless earbuds that supported the tech.

As fond as I am of this charger, I must disagree with Anker that it’s in any way “travel-ready”. Far from pocket-sized at about 2.4 x 2.4 x 2.5 inches / 60 x 60 x 63mm and weighing in at 14oz / 405g, its weight and sturdy design teamed with the non-slip base make it perfect for leaving on your desk or nightstand. But I wouldn’t say that it’s convenient for travel at all.

Overall, if you’re looking for a sturdy 3-in-1 MagSafe charger and you're happy to part with the cash, the Anker 3-in-1 Cube with MagSafe wouldn't be a bad choice. However, there are plenty of options out there if you'd rather have a more travel-friendly alternative that will charge your devices a little faster, then the ESR Qi2 3-in-1 Travel Wireless Charging Set is worth a look. Or, if these Anker or ESR chargers cost more than you'd like to spend, then the Mous MagSafe Compatible 3 In 1 Portable Charger would make a truly transportable alternative.

If you haven't yet made a decision on which charger would suit you best I recommend taking a look at our helpful guides of the best iPhone chargers and best wireless chargers for more ideas.

(Image credit: Future) Anker 3-in-1 Cube with MagSafe review: price & specs

(Image credit: Future) Should I buy the Anker 3-in-1 Cube with MagSafe? Buy it if…

You want something secure
I had no concerns when leaving my phone attached to the Anker 3-in-1 Cube. While other wireless chargers may have just as strong magnets, their general design often leaves them open to catastrophe should they get knocked. Thanks to the 3-in-1 Cube's heft and low center of gravity, I didn’t experience any problems.

You don’t want to be limited to one viewing angle
Many MagSafe wireless chargers enable you to switch between portrait and landscape configurations, but the Anker 3-in-1 Cube gives additional flexibility thanks to its hinged charging plate. It has just the right amount of resistance to hold a phone at basically any angle between the base up to 60 degrees, making it ideal for scrolling or viewing.

Don't buy it if…

You want something travel-ready
Anker may claim that the 3-in-1 Cube is travel-ready, but I simply don’t agree. While the AirPods charger hides beneath the phone charging plate, and the Apple Watch charger can be hidden away inside the cube, its chonky build and heavy weight were very noticeable whenever I tried to transport it between my home and the office.

You’re on a budget
There’s no denying it: this is one pricey phone charger and it’s perfectly understandable if the cost puts you off. But other than my niggles over the stability of the Apple Watch charging platform, it feels very robust and well-made as a whole. I’ve never used a phone charger this sturdy, and I’ve found the variable viewing angle to be a gift that keeps on giving, so it’s worth it if you’ve got the pennies for it. Otherwise, we’ve got other options that are more cost-friendly.

Anker 3-in-1 Cube with MagSafe review: also consider

ESR Qi2 3-in-1 Travel Wireless Charging Set
I'm a big fan of this ESR charging set. It delivers satisfying charging speeds and is sturdy enough to be used as an everyday charger. Granted, it isn't the most compact portable charger out there and has separate components, but it can be purchased with a travel case to make life easier.

JBL Quantum Stream Wireless: One-minute review

If you’re a content creator who needs a portable microphone for a convention, or even just some on-the-go video making, you really can’t go wrong with the JBL Quantum Stream Wireless. This pocket-friendly lapel mic comes with a convenient charging case, much like a pair of wireless earbuds, and works readily with your phone right out of the box. You simply insert the included Lightning or USB-C dongle and you’re ready to go.

I’ve been impressed with the performance during my testing and found that the JBL Quantum Stream Wireless delivers clear sound even in quite loud environments, especially when paired with the noise-canceling capabilities of the compatible JBL Headphones mobile app. The manufacturer touts a 24-hour battery life, with six hours from the microphone and another 18 from its charging case, and this figure was broadly accurate - giving you more than enough juice for an entire day.

Factor in a few more handy features, such as the onboard microphone mute button, and you have a very robust overall package. My one complaint would be that the included windshield, useful for outdoor recording, is a touch fiddly and can be quite hard to securely install. 

Potential buyers should also weigh up whether they actually need a lapel mic. The performance is good for a small, portable device, but you will still get superior sound quality from many of the best microphones for streaming - which would be a better choice if you want to record at home. 

(Image credit: Future) JBL Quantum Stream Wireless: Price and availability

• $99.95 / £89.99 
• USB-C and Lightning variants
• Launched in March 2024 

The JBL Quantum Stream Wireless is readily available for $99.95 / £89.99 directly from JBL and at retailers like Amazon. This might seem like a fair chunk to spend on any microphone, but means that this model sits neatly between super-budget offerings and more premium portable microphones from companies like Rode and DJI. The DJI Mic, for example, features two transmitters and a similar storage space but comes in at roughly double the price of the JBL Quantum Stream Wireless. 

JBL Quantum Stream Wireless: Specs JBL Quantum Stream Wireless: Design and features

• Portable size
• LED power indicators
• Good app

The design of the JBL Quantum Stream Wireless shares quite a lot in common with your average pair of wireless gaming earbuds. Its black carrying case is compact, with a subtle embossed JBL logo and a small row of four white LED indicators used to denote its current charge level. On the back of the case, you can find a type-C charging port, compatible with the included charging cable.

The top of the case opens up like a lid on a hinge, revealing slots for the clip-on microphone and dongle. Both are secured by magnets, though just the microphone also has two metal contacts that allow it to charge while it’s in the case. Removing the microphone gives you a good look at its design, which is mainly constructed from plastic. The front has a smooth grooved pattern, with a little JBL logo, while the back has a generously sized clip for attaching it to your clothes.

On the side of the microphone is a small button, which can be used to quickly mute it. There’s also a bright indicator LED, which is red when the microphone is disabled. Otherwise, it flashes white before turning a solid color when paired with your phone.

There’s very little to report about the dongle itself, which is rectangular and quite light and thin. It attaches to your phone via a type-C or Lightning connector depending on your model of choice, but also has its own USB port for pass-through charging. This is a great little feature and means that you don’t have to worry about not being able to charge your phone while the microphone is in use.

Most of the microphone’s core features are accessed through the JBL Headphones mobile app or JBL Quantum Engine PC software, both of which are compatible with this product. Given the clear focus on portability, I mainly relied on the app which offers the option to check battery levels, alter mic gain, enable AI noise canceling, flick between a few preset effects, and tweak power settings like LED brightness and the automatic power off.

The software isn’t anything revolutionary, but it’s got a decent selection of options and is, importantly, very responsive and well-presented.

(Image credit: Future) JBL Quantum Stream Wireless: Performance

• Effective noise cancellation
• Works well at events
• Great battery life

It’s hard to fault the performance of the JBL Quantum Stream Wireless. I mainly tested the product at events, including the busy halls of Gamescom, and found that it did a great job of cutting through the background noise to deliver perfectly understandable recordings despite its small size. 

You do notice a dip in quality when things get quite loud, with my voice often taking on a slightly robotic edge in particularly large crowds, but that was still preferable to the frankly incomprehensible recordings produced by my phone’s microphone in the same areas. This is also true of its performance outdoors, particularly with loud wind or vehicles. Expect a more natural sound when you’re out on a calm day.

It is a tad unfortunate that the included windshield is so fiddly, though. It clips on the top of the microphone via two little holes but is quite hard to align. I struggled to do it in poor lighting and was often unsure whether it was actually attached. This is not a dealbreaker, but it is worth bearing in mind if you intend to use the windshield a lot.

In terms of battery life, the JBL Quantum Stream Wireless is more than capable. I only have to charge up the case every couple of days with semi-frequent use and never had the microphone die during a recording session. Unless you want to wear it, turned on, for hours and hours at a time, you’re not going to run into any problems here.

(Image credit: Future) Should I buy the JBL Quantum Stream Wireless? Buy it if...

You want a plug-and-play solution
The JBL Quantum Stream Wireless is incredibly easy to use. You simply clip the microphone to your clothes, plug the included dongle into your phone, and you’re ready to go.

You want to create content on the go
The JBL Quantum Stream Wireless is a good option if you’re looking to take your content creation out and about, improving the quality of your audio recordings compared to your phone.

Don't buy it if...

You want a desktop microphone instead
Unless you intend to capitalize on its portability, the JBL Quantum Stream Wireless is not for you. For more general gaming or streaming, consider a standard desktop microphone instead.

You need even more features
More expensive models offer even more expansive feature sets and could be a better pick if you want a more professional recording setup.

Also consider...

If you’re not keen on the JBL Quantum Stream Wireless, you can consider these two top gaming and content-creation microphones instead.

DJI Mic 2  
If you have more to spend and want a similar set of microphones but with two receivers and compatibility with more specialist video equipment, consider the DJI Mic 2. 

For more information, check out our full DJI Mic 2 review

JBL Quantum Stream Studio
JBL also offers a robust option for content creators in the JBL Quantum Stream Studio. It’s not as portable, but it is still simple to use and offers great performance for the price. 

For more information, check out our full JBL Quantum Stream Studio review

(Image credit: Future) How I tested the JBL Quantum Stream Wireless

• Tested over a few months
• Used at various events
• Tried indoors and outdoors

I tested the JBL Quantum Stream Wireless over a period of roughly five months with an iPhone 15 Plus. During that time I took the microphone to a variety of gaming events and tested it in a wide range of conditions both indoors and outdoors. I was careful to evaluate its performance and test all of the available features in its mobile app.

I compared it to a number of desktop mics such as the Asus ROG Carynx, SteelSeries Alias, SteelSeries Alias Pro, and more.

Read more about how we test

First reviewed October 2024.

Marshall Emberton III: Two-minute review

Without a doubt, the Emberton III is one of Marshall's best Bluetooth speakers with long battery life and impressive sound considering its relatively small size. This third generation Emberton delivers even better battery life and slightly louder sound, and while it's not going to rattle the rafters it's an impressive performer.

The Emberton III is particularly good at lower volumes where Marshall's Dynamic Loudness delivers a bass boost that prevents your music from sounding too weedy; for podcasts, where voices tend to be lower frequencies, there's an EQ preset to cut the lows and boost the mid-range instead.

The main selling point here is a feature we weren't able to test: Auracast via Bluetooth LE. Auracast will enable you to create a multi-speaker setup with your Marshall as the sound source, broadcasting over Bluetooth to other Auracast-capable Marshalls, but the feature hasn't yet been implemented. It's coming as an over-the-air update via Marshall's smartphone app and Marshall tells us it's coming very soon. Basically, it's built to be LE Audio ready, so if future-proofing your Bluetooth system is something you're into, it's a great buy.

With speakers this small there is of course a limit to how much bass they can put out and how loud they can go before things start getting harsh. But the Marshall is a powerful performer for its size, and if you don't push it too hard you'll be able to get the most out of its large battery too.

The Emberton III comes in two colours, a light stone and the none more black option shown here. (Image credit: Future / Carrie Marshall) Marshall Emberton III review: Price & release date

• Released August 2024
• Costs $159 / £159 / AU$289

The Marshall Emberton III was launched in August 2024. The recommended retail price is $159 / £159 / AU$289.

This is the third version of this Marshall portable speaker; we reviewed the original Marshall Emberton back in 2020 and the Emberton II in 2022. It's one of two new releases from the firm alongside the Willen II, a smaller and more affordable speaker ($119 / £99 / AU$199) with one driver rather than two.

Marshall Emberton III review: Specs

This is a speaker to listen to, not to look at: controls are simple and straightforward. (Image credit: Future / Carrie Marshall) Marshall Emberton III review: Features

• Bluetooth LE and Auracast ready
• 32+ hours of battery life
• "True Stereophonic" audio

You can set up the Emberton III in two ways: directly through your device's Bluetooth, or via the Marshall iOS or Android app. That gives you access to three EQ presets: the default "Marshall sound"; a low and high end boost; and a mid-range boost. That latter one is for speech such as audiobooks and podcasts. As with the previous model there are no EQ customization options.

Using the device is very simple, because it's a very simple device. There's an on-off button, a rocker switch for volume and track skipping, and a red LED strip to show battery life.

The big news here is the upgrade to Bluetooth LE audio and Auracast multi-device broadcast support. With Auracast you'll be able to share your music to multiple speakers simultaneously, but the Bluetooth LE it requires won't be available on launch day: Marshall promises an update imminently via the Marshall Bluetooth app but of course that means we weren't able to try that specific feature. There's also built in microphone so you can use this Marshall for calls, but not for voice assistants.

As with the previous Emberton, the Emberton III has what Marshall calls True Stereophonic, a 360-degree audio feature that promises to fill your room with surprisingly big sound. Oh, and there's a strap for your backpack so you can annoy people on hikes.

One of the issues with many speakers is that they can become too bass-light at low levels because audio characteristics change with volume. Marshall has a solution that it calls Dynamic Loudness, which automatically adjusts the tonal characteristics based on the volume you're listening at.

Battery life is a claimed 32-plus hours, two more than before, and we didn't have any problems achieving thirty hours with playback volumes around 50%. Full recharge via the USB-C port takes two hours compared to three for the Emberton II.

In a nice touch, the Emberton III plays a cute little ascending guitar riff when you power it on and a descending one when you power it off.

• Features score: 4.5/5

The companion app gives you a choice of three audio presets but there's no custom EQ. (Image credit: Future / Carrie Marshall) Marshall Emberton III review: Sound quality

• Dynamic Loudness impressive at lower volumes
• EQ boost for podcast and audiobooks
• Punchy given its small size

It'd be rude not to start testing with some classic rock, so the first song to try was naturally AC/DC's Back in Black. The Emberton delivered an impressively punchy performance with excellent mid- and high-range clarity, and the promise of room-filling sound was definitely delivered: this little speaker rocks much harder than you'd expect it to and doesn't need you to position it carefully to get the best results.

That said, it's important to manage your expectations with a speaker of this size. There's only so much air that two-inch drivers can push, so while Marshall has done a good job delivering low frequencies at lower volumes – so much so that you might want to swap to the mid-range EQ boost for podcast listening so the presenters don't make everything around you vibrate – when you crank up the Emberton to higher volumes the low end distorts and the higher frequencies become harsh.

With Marshall amplifiers, it's traditional to turn them up. But this Marshall speaker is best turned down. At lower volumes the Dynamic Loudness delivers very impressive bass for a system this small. REM's Out of Time album was a particular highlight, Mike Mills' bass as clear as his harmonies.

The relative lack of bass at higher volumes is particularly noticeable on dance music such as Pet Shop Boys' Loneliness, Troye Sivan's slinky One of Your Girls or Charli XCX's 360, all of which lose a lot of their floor-filling thump, and with expensively produced tracks such as Taylor Swift's No Body No Crime, which has a very distinctive bass drum sound that loses its punch here. All of these tracks sound better quieter on this system.

That's also an issue for guitar-based rock music, especially relatively busy tracks such as The Killers' When You Were Young. It's fun at lower volumes but turn it up and it quickly becomes tiring.

To my ears this is a speaker best suited to bedroom, kitchen or study listening and for taking outside on nice days. If you're looking for a party monster or intend to listen loud you might be better with something built around larger speaker drivers.

• Sound quality score: 4/5

You're not going to mistake this speaker for any other brand. (Image credit: Future / Carrie Marshall) Marshall Emberton III review: Design

• Looks like a Marshall amp
• IP67 for dust and water resistance
• Rugged and stackable

The Emberton III unsurprisingly looks a lot like the Emberton II. As with other Marshalls the design echoes that of the famous Marshall cabinets and stacks we've seen on rock stars' stages, and that means they're pretty rugged-looking and no-nonsense as well as stackable, just like stage speakers. I think they look great; having Marshall's design DNA in speakers makes more sense to me than crowbarring it into headphones such as the Marshall Major III, which I think just look overly boxy. You can choose between a classic black or cream.

The new Emberton is rated IP67 for dust and waterproofing, so it's capable of surviving a dunk as deep as 1m of water for up to 30 minutes. That makes it largely immune to a spilled drink or festival rain.

Inside the Marshall there are two class D amplifiers pushing twin 10W 2-inch full range drivers and two passive radiators. Frequency response is 65Hz to 20kHz and it's slightly louder than before, pushing out a sound pressure level of 90dB at 1m compared to the 87dB of the Emberton II.

The Marshall, thankfully, is a lot lighter than the Marshall amps I've had to lug up and down stairs and fire escapes: it's 0.67kg/1.5lbs.

• Design score: 4.5/5

Marshall Emberton III review: value

• Lots of impressive competitors in this price bracket
• Marshall's battery life leaves many rivals behind

At $159 / £159 / AU$289 this speaker is competing against some very impressive rivals: spend £20 more and you could get our current favorite among the best Bluetooth speakers, the Sonos Roam 2. But where the Marshall has the Sonos speaker beaten is in battery life.

The Sonos promises up to 10 hours whereas the Marshall can deliver more than three times that. So if you're going to a weekend festival or anywhere else where home comforts will be absent for a few days, the Marshall is the speaker you'll want to take with you. It's small enough to be truly portable but loud enough to soundtrack your adventures without having to push it too hard.

• Value score: 4.5/5

Should you buy the Marshall Emberton III? Buy it if…

You like the Marshall sound
You can't customize the EQ presets so you're going to be listening the way Marshall intends.

You like 'em tough
Just like Marshall's amps this looks and feels bomb-proof.

You listen long
With 32 hours of battery life this speaker has serious stamina.

Don't buy it if…

You're a bass monster
There's only so much air two-inch drivers can push.

You listen loud
Like most speakers of this size, the Marshall isn't at its best when it's really loud.

You want to connect a cable
The Emberton III doesn't have an Aux socket.

Marshall Emberton III review: Also consider

Sonos Roam 2
We called the original "the best Bluetooth speaker on the planet", although the controversy over Sonos's bungled app update has tarnished the brand a little this year. But the Roam 2 is a superb portable speaker with exceptional sound. Find out if it's the better option for you by reading our in-depth Sonos Roam 2 review

JBL Charge 5
The Charge 5 is a hooligan, and we mean that as a compliment: it's ridiculously loud for its size and while it doesn't offer 360-degree audio it does deliver 100% audio entertainment. Its drivers are larger than those in the Marshall and you can hear the difference. For more info, see our full JBL Charge 5 review

Marshall Willen II
The Emberton has a baby sibling, the Willen. It's effectively half an Emberton with a single 10-inch full range driver, and while it’s not as loud as the Emberton it's still impressive for its size. Battery life is 17 hours and it weighs just 0.36kg/0.79lbs. We haven't reviewed it actually, but if you like its looks, it's worth a look… 

How I tested the Marshall Emberton III

• Tested for two weeks as an alternative to Apple HomePods and UE's Wonderboom
• Used indoors at sensible levels – and loud outside
• Listened to Apple Music, my own library, Overcast podcasts and some of my own tunes too

I used the Marshall Emberton III for two weeks with Apple Music and some of my own recordings, using the same tracks I use to test all audio kit – a big mix of genres including live performances, dance and pop music, various flavors of metal and more. I also listened to podcasts via the Overcast app.

I've been a musician and audio obsessive for over 35 years now, and I've been reviewing audio kit – headphones, speakers and audio devices of all kinds – since the late 1990s.

Read more about how we test

• First reviewed: October 2024

Peak Design Outdoor Backpack 25L: two-minute review

Peak Design's Outdoor Backpack range is the latest series of bags from the US-based camera accessory maker. It's available in three colors and in 25L and 45L versions, and is due to hit the market in November 2024 after a successful crowdfunding campaign, with retailers already taking preorders.

I was among the first group of reviewers to receive a review sample, and I've been using the Peak Design Outdoor Backpack 25L, in white, as my primary bag for the last three months ahead of its launch. I've found it to be a highly versatile bag that has rewarded the time I've invested to customize it for my needs.

I'm a photographer, commuter and serial outdoors adventurer, and Peak Design's Outdoor Backpack and has proven itself to be apt companion for all these scenarios, becoming my first-choice bag these last couple of months. It's not a dedicated camera bag per se, but it'll do the trick for a little bit of camera gear, with the right Peak Design accessories.

Image 1 of 3

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)Image 2 of 3

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)Image 3 of 3

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman) Peak Design Outdoor Backpack 25L: price and availability

• Two sizes: 25L and 45L
• Three colors: white, black or dark red
• Preorders now, global launch due late November

The Peak Design Outdoor Backpack is available in two sizes: 25L and 4L, and in three colors; Cloud (white) Eclipse (dark red) or Black – the white 25L version is pictured throughout this review. The 25L version costs $249.99 / £249.99 and the 45L version is $329.99 / £329.99. The bag is due to go on sale globally in late November.

Peak Design Outdoor Backpack 25L: specs Peak Design Outdoor Backpack 25L: design

• Daisy-chain loops to fasten cords to
• Weather-resistant exterior but not waterproof
• Accessories include raincover, hip belt and more

For commuting, I usually pack a 17-inch MacBook Pro laptop, mirrorless camera with lens, a spare change of clothes, as I often run to work, plus a few accessories (in a Peak Design Camera Cube), all of which fit snugly into the 25L version of the Peak Design Outdoor Backpack. I slip a water bottle and a travel tripod into the elasticated side pockets and I'm good to go.

There's no dedicated place to store camera gear – the Outdoor Backpack's main compartment is single open space, without the padded dividers you typically get in a dedicated camera bag. If you want to pack you camera and accessories you can pick up one of Peak Design's Camera Cubes, which will slot in nicely to securely hold that pricey gear. You just need to ensure that it's the right-size cube for the size of bag – there's guidance on Peak Design's website, plus new soft-shell Packing Cubes. A decent alternative to a Peak Design Cube is a gear wrap like 3 Legged Thing's Wrapz.

For daily use over months, the Outdoor BackPack 25L has proven itself durable, comfortable, and versatile. Its shoulder straps are well padded, and are fastened to the bag through a loop rather than being stitched on. This excellent design touch removes the stitching stress point (lesser-quality straps can become un-stitched) and should ensure that the straps last for many years of heavy use.

Both of the straps also feature an elasticated pocket that will comfortably fit a large phone – my Pixel handset slotted in comfortably and securely.

Elsewhere on the outside are the aforementioned elasticated side pockets, and what I've seen Peak Design call a 'daisy chain' of loops along most of the bag's seams that you can feed cords through, several of which there are included, to secure larger items such as a travel tripod. The ways to customize the Outdoor Backpack based on what you're carrying feel endless, even if some are a little fiddly.

I have regularly used the bag for short runs (around 6km) from a train station to my workplace, and even with a full load it sits comfortably on my shoulders, especially with the optional hip belt in place for additional lumbar support. However, on my runs, and on hikes in hot weather, I found that got more sweaty than I'd like to; it would be great to have better breathability on the back.

I also found the two zips to the main compartment, when closed together at the top of the bag, came loose during running and on a couple of occasions I had to rescue the contents as they spilled out. Closing the zips towards the bottom of the bag on once side instead avoided this issue.

Image 1 of 4

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)Image 2 of 4

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)Image 3 of 4

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)Image 4 of 4

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

There are two ways to access the main compartment: the zips, which open the entire back, or the soft roll-top magnetic-clasped opening. For the former, you lie the bag down on its front to open it up and access the entire contents, while using the latter you can keep everything inside and rummage through the contents via the top opening.

The roll-top pocket is fitted securely inside the bag's weatherproof exterior with a cord, which is released for access via a neat pull-tab. To pack the top away, you pull at the cord to close down the opening (see gallery below). It's a very clever bit of design, and reassuringly robust, locking the cord securely with whatever tension you like. I regularly crammed a sweater or light rain jacket outside the main compartment but inside that adjustable weatherproof exterior, securing it in place with the cord. It's just a shame that there's no obvious place to put that cord when the top is closed off, as it simply dangles and is at risk of snagging.

There are no interior pockets in the main compartment, just a laptop sleeve. Peak Design says the 25L bag can hold a 16-inch laptop, but I found the stretchy sleeve snuggly held my 17-inch MacBook Pro.

There are no dedicated padded dividers, which I understand helps to keep the bag light and customizable. However, even with one of Peak Design's (add-on) Camera Cubes in place to secure gear in its padded dividers, access to gear is slower than I'd like.

Image 1 of 4

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)Image 2 of 4

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)Image 3 of 4

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)Image 4 of 4

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

Speaking as a photographer, I would love quicker access to gear, say through a side-access zipped opening. A few design tweaks like these could realize the Outdoor Backpack as the perfect versatile camera bag.

With a fully loaded bag and a Camera Cube positioned inside at the top, it doesn't take too long to access your gear, but you will have to take the bag off your shoulders.

I wouldn't describe this as a dedicated camera bag, nor would I specifically call it an outdoors bag; but it does a decent job of both, even if there are better alternatives out there that are focused on one or the other. As an all-in-one option, the Peak Design Outdoor Backpack has served my daily needs, photography and otherwise, better than any bag I've used for quite some time.

Should I buy the Peak Design Outdoor Backpack 25L?

(Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman) Buy it if...

You carry just a small amount of camera gear alongside daily items
The 25L Outdoor Backpack can hold a little bit of camera gear, but not a lot.

You demand excellent quality
There's no doubt this is a high-quality backpack, from its premium materials to cleaver design touches.

Don't buy it if...

You're looking for a dedicated camera gear bag
With no padded dividers or quick side access, photographers will find a dedicated bag an easier companion.

You're on a tight budget
The bag is pricey, and so too are the additional accessories needed to optimize your experience.

How I tested the Peak Design Outdoor Backpack 25L

• Two months of daily use
• Commuting, outdoor hikes and photography walks
• Paired with Peak Design Camera Cubes

I used the Peak Design Outdoor Backpack 25L as my primary bag for a few months ahead of its official launch and writing this review. It has been on my shoulders for commuting, running and hiking. I've paired it with Peak Design's Camera Cubes to improve the overall handling of the bag for securely storing camera gear.

First reviewed November 2024

Baseus Bowie 30 Max: two-minute review

The Baseus Bowie 30 Max headphones are a perfect example of some cans that bite off more than they can chew. At a glance, you’d think these are an incredibly competent pair of Bluetooth headphones. They offer LDAC higher-resolution audio, proprietary head-tracking technology, active noise cancellation, customizable button controls and incredible battery life. But something may throw up a red flag fairly quickly – the low price.

That’s right, although the Baseus Bowie 30 Max have a list price of $149.99 / £109.99, you’ll realistically never have to pay quite so much. They’re already discounted on Amazon and the Baseus website has them available for less than that too. We’ve already spotted them going for as little as $69.99 in the US – that’s really cheap for some headphones with all of the above features. So is it too good to be true?

Frankly, yes it is. In fairness, getting up to 65 hours of listening is excellent, better than even some of the best headphones around, but things go pretty downhill from here. Head tracking, though functional, will worsen overall audio quality – though admittedly not as badly as the ‘fixed’ spatial audio option, which leaves you with almost sub-nautical sound littered with tinniness.

General audio quality isn’t amazing either. Out of the box, bass is thin and treble sounds are pretty grating at higher volumes. And sure, there’s a Bass Boost option in the Baseus app, or even custom EQ options, but these are only able to improve – not cure – the Bowie 30 Max of their sonic shortcomings. This means that the added detail you’d expect to uncover with the inclusion of LDAC never truly comes to fruition and fundamental flaws in sound means these headphones are held back from competing strongly against budget rivals.

It isn’t all doom and gloom. These are some decent looking cans with a relatively attractive rectangle-like design. Mic and call quality is decent too and ANC, though far from silence-inducing, is able to dull external noise competently. You can also customize the function of the headphones’ ANC button, which is a neat inclusion.

However, these are ultimately small wins in the context of disappointing audio quality. Unfortunately, if you’re in the market for some cheap ANC headphones, there are better options available to you. I have some personal recommendations in the ‘Also Consider’ section of this review, but if you’d like, you can consult our guide to the best cheap headphones, where we run you through some incredible alternatives that offer plenty of bang for your buck.

Baseus Bowie 30 Max review: price & release date

• $149.99 / £109.99 (around AU$230) list price, but already discounted
• Launched in the US and UK September 2024
• Australia release date and pricing TBC

To be honest, reader, I’m a little confused on pricing for the Baseus Bowie 30 Max. They have a list price of $149.99 / £109.99 (around AU$230) on Amazon US/UK, but just head over to the Baseus website and these are only $79.99 (or $69.99 with an in-site coupon). On top of that, despite only releasing in September, these have been hit with discounts and coupons on Amazon. So really, I’d aim to pay around that $70/$80 mark if you really want to grab these.

The Baseus Bowie 30 Max are available now in the US and the UK, although the company isn’t planning to sell them to the Australian market. They’re available in one color option – Black, although this is pretty clean in fairness (more on this later).

(Image credit: Future) Baseus Bowie 30 Max review: Specs Baseus Bowie 30 Max review: features

• Decent head-tracked spatial audio
• Companion app compatibility
• Adequate ANC

When it comes to features, the Baseus Bowie 30 Max appear to pack in some seriously impressive options for often sub-$100/£100 cans.

I’m mainly talking about head tracking – a great inclusion for some budget headphones, but one that produces mixed results. Audio does dynamically shift with head movement quite well, which is ideal for following sound across a screen when viewing video content.

The catch? You take a hit to audio quality. When listening to Wasurechau Hitotoki by Fishmans, vocals and percussion became very tinny with head tracking active, which frankly, made it unpleasant to listen to. But as I say, this feature is predominantly for video, so I tried watching some Final Fantasy VII: Rebirth gameplay on YouTube. And again, although audio did shift as I turned my head, the actual quality was noticeably worse than when head tracking was turned off, making for a disappointing user experience.

Even worse was the Fixed spatial audio option. But when listening to Rock With You by Michael Jackson I didn’t get expansive, spacious sound at all; instead it sounded as if I’d journeyed around 10ft below sea level. Vocals sounded warped and inauthentic while percussion lacked sharpness, so I switched this off again pretty quickly. The out-of-the box audio didn’t exactly make this song sound amazing either, so I found myself playing around with EQ options a fair bit – but I’ll get onto that in the ‘Sound quality’ section.

OK, maybe spatial audio might not quite hit the spot, but how do the other features fare? Well, ANC wasn’t too bad. At around 60% volume a lot of outside sounds were fairly dulled, although a lot of sounds – whether lower or higher-frequency – still crept through with relative ease. For instance, even at around 75% volume, I could make out the sound of my colleague typing next to me. So don’t expect the near-silent listening experience you’d get from some more premium cans, like the Bose QuietComfort Ultra, for example.

The story so far is certainly one of disappointment, although Baseus didn’t let me down on battery life. I kept the LDAC ‘hi-res’ codec activated throughout almost all of the testing process and predominantly listened at quite high volumes, but found my playtime to be in-line with the 50 hours ANC claimed. You even get up to 65 hours with ANC off, which is an excellent serving of battery life. So, if you’re someone that often forgets to charge their devices, this shouldn’t matter too much with the Baseus Bowie 30 Max – they can keep going (and going) for quite some time.

• Features score: 3/5

(Image credit: Future) Baseus Bowie 30 Max review: sound quality

• Thin bass out of the box
• LDAC audio support
• Highs can get quite tinny

I’ll be upfront – the Baseus Bowie 30 Max didn’t offer the best listening experience out of the box. When listening to I Want You by Moloko, I felt that percussion and higher-pitched vocals were pretty grating at higher volumes and even sounded a bit tinny. I should mention too, that was with LDAC audio turned on – the benefits of which never felt truly realized.

Something that puzzled me was Baseus’ claim that the Bowie 30 Max have “super bass”. I definitely didn’t feel that initially. When listening to Love Foolosophy by Jamiroquai, the groovy bassline was relegated to a small-part background actor and the choppy guitar riff and vocals sounded too forward. Admittedly, the thin low-end was improved significantly when I toggled on Bass Boost in the Baseus app, but of course, the grating highs didn’t stop.

I knew what I had to do… I took to the EQ settings to make amends to the Bowie 30 Max’s sonic shortcomings. Unfortunately, I found the different presets – including Baseus Classic, Clear Vocals, Hi-Fi Live, Pop and Rock Classic – lacked enough definition. There were noticeable differences between them, sure, but it was pretty minimal for the most part. Instead, I found the best solution was to create my own custom tuning, with a bit more low-end weight. A lot of users may be OK with tailoring their own sound, but if you’re someone that wants straightforward, hassle free listening that could be a bit of a turn off.

So, after customizing my own sound were my woes overcome? Well, not entirely. Despite having a bit more bite, bass and electric guitars in Walk Up by Geordie Greep sounded fairly muddy and instrumental separation was lacking. Vocals in White Mustang by Lana Del Ray also sounded boxy and constricted, resulting in an unnatural-sounding delivery. I would say, though, that lower-frequency sounds were no longer hidden away to a frustrating degree and the overall listening experience became at least adequate. So if you do decide to snap these up on a discount sale, it’s 100% worth shifting away from the top-heavy Baseus Classic EQ calibration.

One aspect sound-wise that was somewhat redeeming was mic quality. When recording the opening of Charles Dickens' A Tale of Two Cities, my voice was pretty clear-cut, with only a bit of ambience in the background. Call quality, meanwhile, was a bit more middling in terms of quality, but still totally passable. I was still, however, underwhelmed with the audio on offer from the Baseus Bowie 30 Max – especially given the manufacturer's claim that they offer “superior audio quality”. I’m sorry to say that this is not the case.

• Sound quality score: 2.5/5

(Image credit: Future) Baseus Bowie 30 Max review: design

• Tidy design for the price
• Although the headband is a little plasticky
• Customizable button controls

I’ve been quite critical of the Baseus Bowie 30 Max so far, but one area I think they succeed more in is design. When at a discounted price, these headphones look great for the price you pay. They have a more rectangular, classic look than a lot of cheap options and small ring lights on each can add a nice splash of style too.

The headband isn’t the most padded thing in the world, but I was able to happily listen for multiple hours on end. Looks-wise it is a tad plasticky – and the glossy finish means you can see fingerprints fairly easily, but it’s not particularly ugly or anything.

Speaking of a plasticky look, the button controls suffer from a similar issue, feeling a little cheap. They are, however, nicely laid out and, despite volume down, up, and play/pause being quite close together, they’re easy to use. There’s also an ANC button that can handily be customized using the Baseus app to switch between noise cancelling modes, EQ settings, or spatial audio options.

The Bowie 30 Max are also decently portable. They’re not as compact as a model like the Anker Soundcore Space One Pro or anything, but they can be folded up for carrying in a backpack or tote bag. These are fairly lightweight headphones too weighing in at 11.3 oz / 320g and have decently soft earpads, so they’ll not be too uncomfortable for longer listening sessions, even if the headband isn’t top quality. My main complaint here though is that these cans don’t come with a carry case or similar for keeping them safe during longer journeys.

Finally, don’t expect anything super-fancy or hi-tech from these design-wise. There’s no waterproofing or touch controls – although this isn’t too bad if you’re getting them on discount for around $70/£70. What you do get though is an AUX port for wired listening and USB-C charging, the latter of which can give you as much as 14 hours of playtime from a 10-minute recharge – not bad.

• Design score: 3.5/5

(Image credit: Future) Baseus Bowie 30 Max review: value

• Even when discounted, rivals perform better
• Head tracking nice at this cost, but mixed quality
• Ultimately, sound quality not good enough against competitors

If we’re going by their $149.99 / £109.99 list price, I’d argue that the Baseus Bowie 30 Max are totally outclassed by a wide array of competitors, competing against competitors in the same ballpark, like the Sony WH-CH720N, for instance (more on those later).

However, from early discounts, I suspect these will be available for far less for a lot of the time. Early sales and coupon offers on Amazon US/UK even put these as low as $69.99 / £68.79, so don’t look to pay much more than that. And sure, at this price, getting features like spatial audio is undoubtedly impressive. But, what matters above all is good sound quality and I would argue that’s adequate at best with these headphones. Some of the best cheap headphones – like the Earfun Wave Pro – will likely prove to be a much better value pick.

• Value score: 3/5

(Image credit: Future) Should I buy the Baseus Bowie 30 Max? Buy them if…

You want head tracking at a low-price
Although sound quality isn’t top-rate, head tracking is still functional here. It’s not going to give you truly exceptional 3D sound, but if you simply want audio that will dynamically shift as you peer across a screen this is a budget option.

You’re looking for a splash of style
For all of my criticism, I do like the look of the Baseus Bowie 30 Max, they have a fairly unique appearance. There are no color options and the headband is a little plasticky, but overall they have a clean, attractive design.

Don’t buy them if…

You’re an audiophile
If you checked out the ‘Sound quality’ section, this will come as little surprise. Out of the box, bass is too thin, highs often sound tinny and the ‘hi-res’ details don’t really get the chance to breathe. Even with EQ adjustments, these aren’t going to cut it for the most keen listeners.

You want the ultimate value pick
The world of wireless headphones is truly vast. There are so many amazing options out there for you, regardless of your budget. There’s no need to spend an arm and a leg to get top features like ANC – I’ve picked out some stronger budget options below that, in my view, offer cleaner audio and a better user experience overall.

(Image credit: Future) Baseus Bowie 30 Max review: also consider

1More Sonoflow
The 1More Sonoflow still sit proudly in our guide to the best noise-canceling headphones – and for good reason. You get 50 hours of battery life with ANC on (and 70 hours with ANC off), solid overall sound, what is (in my opinion) quite a stylish build and solid ANC. Now that’s value. Read our full 1More Sonoflow review.

Sony WH-CH720N
I’ve owned the Sony WH-CH720N for over a year now and highly recommend them if you’re looking for a strong budget option. Yes, at first these may look a fair bit more than the discounted Baseus Bowie Max – but these cans are regularly available for closer to $90/£70. You get commendable ANC, quality customizable audio, DSEE upscaling and so much more. You can even choose from some neat color options, ensuring these are an excellent alternative. Read our full Sony WH-CH720N review.

Baseus Bowie 30 Max review: How I tested

• Tested across the course of a week
• Used in the office, while on walks and on public transport
• Predominantly tested using Tidal on the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

I spent a week testing the Baseus Bowie 30 Max headphones in a number of settings, including: my apartment; a train; bus; and while on walks. This let me get a real taste for ANC quality, regardless of environment.

When listening to music, I played the entirety of the TechRadar testing playlist and listened to hours and hours of tunes from my own personal library. I predominantly tested using Tidal to make use of LDAC, but I also tested the headphones using Spotify, YouTube and Messenger (for calling). I mainly connected the headphones up to the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE when conducting tests.

Where appropriate, I compared these headphones to the Sony WH-CH720N, judging them side-by-side with the Baseus Bowie 30 Max to gauge audio quality, features and design choices.

First reviewed: October 2024

Read more about how we test

Beyerdynamic MMX 330 Pro: two-minute review

The Beyerdynamic MMX 330 Pro brings the German brand’s noted pro audio pedigree to the gaming world, in the form of an open-back gaming headset that’s light on features, but promises big things in the realm of sound.

At first glance, you’d be forgiven for not realizing this is a piece of gaming hardware, given the lack of flair. The monotone palette is only slightly alleviated by specks of orange, but if you’re willing you can customize your own design via Beyerdynamic’s website.

Compared to some of the best wired gaming headsets, the MMX 330 Pro is pleasingly slim. It’s also light, which makes it comfortable. The plush ear pads and thoughtfully designed headband also help in this regard, although I did find the MMX 300 Pro to be slightly more comfortable, as the inside of its drivers didn’t push into my ears as much as those on the MMX 330 Pro.

The detachable analog cable is thick yet doesn’t weigh down the headset. The strain reliefs aren’t the strongest, so I don’t have complete confidence they’ll resist splitting over time, but they offer more protection than on some other gaming headsets. The inline controller has a volume wheel and a mute button, although there are no mic volume controls as there are on the MMX 300 Pro, which is an odd omission, but not one I missed greatly.

Unlike the MMX 300 Pro, the MMX 330 Pro sports an open-back design, intended to impart a more natural sound and create a greater sense of space. I didn’t find this added to the immersion or increased my perception of the in-game ambiance, but I personally prefer closed-back designs. There is also a loss of low-end compared to the MMX 300 Pro, which was already lacking in that department.

All this isn’t to say that the sound of the MMX 330 Pro is poor, though. True to many of Beyerdynamic’s headphones and headsets, the audio balance is superb, with most frequencies coming across clearly and precisely. In this regard, it certainly ranks among the best gaming headsets.

The microphone quality is similarly great, rendering voices with clarity and doing a good job of preventing unwanted sound from being picked up. It’s also very well made, with the gooseneck design making it easy to manipulate yet secure enough to remain in position. It can also be rotated out of the way easily.

There’s no denying that the MMX 330 Pro is incredibly expensive, even eclipsing some of the best wireless gaming headsets. Oddly, it’s also more expensive in North America, which Beyerdynamic claims is due to certain market conditions and launch timeframe concerns.

Whatever the reasons, the fact is there are gaming headsets available that pack in more features for less money, yet still provide terrific audio quality. If you don’t mind sticking to cables, then the Epos H3 wired gaming headset is a brilliant alternative, and for those who want less clutter, the Razer BlackShark V2 Pro is one of the best wireless gaming headsets around.

(Image credit: Future) Beyerdynamic MMX 330 Pro review: price and availability

• $329 / £259 / AU$499
• Black only (unless customized)
• More expensive in the US

The MMX 330 Pro costs $329 / £259 / AU$499 and is available in black only. However, you can customize it with your own designs via Beyerdynamic’s website, letting you add engravings and your own photos to have emblazoned on the drivers.

The MMX 330 Pro costs the same as the MMX 300 Pro in the UK, EU, and Australia; in the US, however, it’s more expensive: $329 as opposed to $299 for the MMX 300 Pro. Having contacted Beyerdynamic, a representative explained the increase comes down to regional costs and distribution logistics, as well as the headset's launch timeline. Regardless, it’s still a bad deal for those in North America.

The only major difference between the 300 and the 330 is the open and closed-back designs. I did, however, notice a softer earpad material on the MMX 330 Pro, and the lack of mic volume controls on the inline controller.

For a wired gaming headset, the MMX 330 Pro sits towards the higher end of the market. The Epos H3, one of the best wired gaming headsets, is much cheaper. In our Epos H3 review, we were very impressed with its detailed audio quality, which made it great for both gaming and listening to music. There is also a wireless version available in the form of the Epos H3 Hybrid, although this is close to the same price as the MMX 330 Pro.

The MMX 330 Pro is also considerably more expensive than the best wireless gaming headset, the Razer BlackShark V2 Pro. Not only does this headset ditch the cables, but it also has more features, including software that allows you to alter various sound settings and modes.

Beyerdynamic MMX 330 Pro review: specs

(Image credit: Future) Beyerdynamic MMX 330 Pro review: design and features

• Surprisingly slim
• Not quite as comfortable as the MMX 330 Pro
• No extra features

In line with Beyerdynamic’s other headsets, the MMX 330 Pro adopts a muted aesthetic, with only a few dashes of orange contrasting with the monochromatic color scheme. It certainly isn’t as brash as some other gaming headsets, which may or may not please players depending on their preferences.

For a gaming headset, the MMX 330 Pro is refreshingly slender, with minimal protrusion from the drivers. Beyerdynamic’s other headsets can verge on the unwieldy, including the MMX 200 Wireless, which is also less comfortable. The MMX 330 Pro still isn’t what you’d call portable, though, and the lack of driver swivel means they aren’t the easiest to hang around your neck.

Compared to the MMX 300 Pro, the earpad material here is more plush and feels slightly baggier but also softer. The thickness of the cushioning is about the same, but it didn’t feel quite as comfortable, with the inside of the drivers pressing into my ears with more force than those on the MMX 300 Pro. This isn’t to say the MMX 330 Pro is uncomfortable, but fatigue did set in sooner than it did with the MMX 300 Pro.

The headband, though, is just as excellent as it is on the MMX 300 Pro. The fontanelle that helps to relieve pressure at the top of the head really does work, and I experienced hardly any aching on the top of my head after extended sessions with the MMX 330 Pro, which I am liable to feel with many other headsets. It also seems durable, although it is easily replaceable (as are the earpads).

The detachable 3.5mm analog cable feels premium, although the strain reliefs don’t appear to be the most resilient, so I wouldn’t be surprised if they began to split over time. They also attract dust too easily, which is hard to remove. It’s also hard to tell when the plug is fully inserted into the headset socket – again similar to the MMX 300 Pro – as there’s no audible click or physical feedback, but this is a minor gripe.

(Image credit: Future)

Despite its length, the cable has no noticeable effect on the weight of the MMX 330 Pro when wearing it. And as with the best PS5 headsets, it’s unobtrusive when plugged into a DualSense controller, making it easy to use with the console.

The in-line controller feels well-made too. It features a volume wheel that operates smoothly and a mic mute button. However, there are no mic volume controls as there were on the MMX 300 Pro, which may bother some people, but I rarely used them when they were present.

One issue that’s plagued every Beyerdynamic headset I’ve tried is the poor driver height adjustment, and the MMX 330 Pro is no exception. The mechanism feels clunky and stiff, making it hard to maneuver, and while it does offer a secure hold once set in position, the engineering isn’t on par with the rest of the headset – and isn’t what you’d expect from a gaming headset at this price point.

The microphone is, however, up to the standards you would expect. The gooseneck is easy to adjust yet secure, and the cloth tip feels thicker and more durable than on other gaming headsets. Although it doesn’t detach or retract, it can be rotated 360 degrees, allowing you to move it out of the way completely.

As with the MMX 300 Pro, there are no extra features on the MMX 330 Pro. The simplicity is refreshing, letting you plug and play without having to worry about connectivity and setups. However, for a gaming headset at this price, more adjustments and settings would’ve been welcome, so you could dial in the perfect sound according to your individual preferences.

(Image credit: Future) Beyerdynamic MMX 330 Pro review: performance

• Great gaming sound
• Open-back design lends more space
• Weaker low-end than the MMX 300 Pro

Beyerdynamic’s famed audio quality is present and correct on the MMX 330 Pro, with frequencies appearing crisp and clear. Beyerdynamic claims the open-back design adds a greater sense of space, allowing you to perceive sounds more naturally.

While gaming, I did notice a more airy sound, but I wouldn’t exactly call this an improvement. The claim that it makes it easier to tell where sound is coming from wasn’t something I experienced during my time with the MMX 330 Pro.

Personally, I prefer the isolation and depth of sound you get from closed-back headsets. Beyerdynamic points out that it has less bass than the MMX 300 Pro because of the open-back design, and this is noticeable. The low-end of the MMX 300 Pro was already a touch on the weaker side, but here it is even more so. It’s not completely devoid of impact, but if you’re going to be using a headset for listening to music as well as gaming, then the 300 Pro is the slightly better choice.

As with the MMX 300 Pro, the microphone on the MMX 330 Pro renders voices with clarity and precision, and blocks unwanted noises from registering with aplomb, including coughs and other plosive sounds.

(Image credit: Future) Should I buy the Beyerdynamic MMX 330 Pro? Buy it if...

You want an open-back design
The open-back design of the MMX 330 Pro means a greater sense of space, so if that’s what you prefer, this fits the bill.

You want a simple headset
No setup, no buttons, no software: the MMX 330 Pro is plug-and-play all the way.

Don't buy it if...

You want to tinker with settings
Unfortunately, the aforementioned simplicity means there are no sonic adjustments to make or different modes to select, so you’re stuck with what you get.

You’re on a budget
The MMX 330 Pro is one of the most expensive wired gaming headsets on the market, and US customers will be especially aggrieved that it’s more expensive for them.

Also consider...

Beyerdynamic MMX 300 Pro
The closed-back counterpart to the MMX 330 Pro, the MMX 300 Pro offers a deeper bass response as a result of its tight isolation. I found the comfort levels to be slightly improved too, and it’s also cheaper in the US than the MMX 330 Pro. However, it still suffers from the same lack of features and connectivity options, being a wired-only headset also.

Read our Beyerdynamic MMX 300 Pro review.

Razer BlackShark V2 Pro
If you have your heart set on a gaming headset with no cables, then you can’t do much better than the Razer BlackShark V2 Pro, as it’s our pick as the best wireless headset around. Not only is it cheaper than the MMX 330 Pro, it also has more features thanks to its integration with Razer’s Synapse software – and we still found its audio quality to be class-leading.

Read our Razer BlackShark V2 Pro review.

How I tested the Beyerdynamic MMX 330 Pro

• Tested for several days
• Used for gaming, music and video playback
• 20+ years gaming experience

I tested the MMX 330 Pro for several days. During that time, I used it to play numerous games, listen to music and watch video content.

I tested the headset on PC, PS5 and Nintendo Switch. I played various titles, including Counter-Strike 2, Sea of Thieves, Silent Hill 2 Remake and The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom. I also tested the microphone by playing online multiplayer and recording its input to playback and assess the quality.

I have over 20 years of gaming experience, and I have tested numerous headphones and headsets during that time. These include Beyerdrynamic’s other gaming headsets, such as the MMX 200 Wireless and the MMX 300 Pro.

SiriusXM app: Two-minute review

Mention SiriusXM and most people think of the service that uses satellites to beam hundreds of music, talk, comedy, news, and sports radio stations to automobiles. That service has become popular for several reasons. First, traditional (i.e., terrestrial AM/FM) radio isn’t what it used to be. Second, for many in rural areas, the ability to receive terrestrial station signals can be limited.

However, there is a SiriusXM internet-based mobile app that delivers virtually all of the content found on the satellite service. While that typically requires a line of site between the automobile and the satellite to work, like the best music streaming services, the SiriusXM app only requires a cellular or Wi-Fi connection. It will work on your iOS or Android-based phone or tablet and is also supported by many of the best TVs, the best streaming devices, and the best wireless speakers from brands such as Sonos and Bose. The app’s content can also be accessed on a computer web browser. SiriusXM’s app has you covered whether you are home, outside exercising, in your car, or anywhere else where you can access the internet.

The SiriusXM app’s All Access” $9.99 per month subscription plan includes an astonishing amount of content that is sure to provide something for everyone. It features over 425 streaming stations and thousands of podcasts courtesy of Pandora, which is owned by SiriusXM. As discussed below, there’s also exclusive content, the crowning jewel of which is The Howard Stern Show and its related programming.

Unlike streaming services such as Spotify, Apple Music, Qobuz, and Tidal, the SiriusXM app does not support the playback of specific music tracks or the creation of track-specific music playlists. (Users can train the app through thumbs up and down icons to play the type of music that they like, however.) Also, some of the music channels can get a bit repetitive and the sound quality won’t satisfy those using expensive, audiophile playback gear. Still, with the enormous amount of content available on the app, all of which is served up via a slick interface, we think the only problem will be deciding what to listen to and watch.

SiriusXM app review: Pricing and subscription

The SiriusXM app's Library, Live Sports, and Podcasts screens (Image credit: SiriusXM)

• $9.99 per month
• Three-month free trial 
• No free ad-based tier

A SiriusXM app All Access subscription plan costs $9.99 per month and can be canceled at any time. It provides access to over 425 channels of ad-free music, news, talk, comedy, and sports. Also included are the Howard Stern channels, video, sports talk, live sports coverage, artist stations, Pandora podcasts, and exclusive in-studio content.

If you want also to receive SiriusXM satellite radio for your car, numerous plans start at $16.98 per month. Details about those plans are available on SiriusXM’s website.

As with competitors like Apple Music, there's no free ad-based tier for any SiriusXM subscription plan. Nor is there a comprehensive family plan, although there is a discount for each additional subscription within the family. Students can get the All Access plan for $4 per month. Also, a three-month free trial for All Access will let you determine if it is right for you.

SiriusXM app review: Specs SiriusXM app review: Content

SiriusXM app screens (Image credit: SiriusXM)

• Over 425 diverse audio channels, plus video
• Includes ad-free music and live-action sports
• Pandora podcasts

The content library available with the SiriusXM app’s All Access subscription plan is, to say the least, extremely vast. For example, if you’ve come to the SiriusXM app for music, there are plenty of ad-free music stations ranging from SiriusXM Hits 1 (pop hits from Taylor Swift, Harry Styles, Miley Cyrus, etc.) to Oldies Party (The Supremes, Elvis Presley, etc.) and Miles Davis Radio (24/7 Miles Davis music).

Though the tracks on some of the app’s music stations can sometimes be repetitive, there’s always another interesting station or special event to tune in to. For example, SiriusXM’s Billy Joel Channel is currently broadcasting that artist’s final show from his ten-year Madison Square Garden residency.

Speaking of concerts, one fun thing about the SiriusXM app is the weekly giveaways. Some of the giveaways are tickets to see an artist at a venue near the entrant’s home. Others throw in an all-expenses paid trip to see an artist at a venue far away, such as Taylor Swift performing in Miami, Florida during her Eras tour.

For talk and entertainment fans, the elephant in the room is SiriusXM’s exclusive arrangement with talk host Howard Stern, who has two channels on the platform. Howard 100 broadcasts his show live and then repeats them until the next live show airs, while Howard 101 broadcasts a supplemental “wrap-up show,” archived Stern content, special features, and video clips recorded in Stern’s SiriusXM studio. Other interesting talk and entertainment channels include Business Radio (business, money, and life) and Crime Junkie Radio (24/7 true crime).

If you like sports, there is not only talk and analysis, but extensive play-by-play game coverage. ESPN Radio (sports talk and big games), SiriusXM College Sports Radio, and SiriusXM PGA Tour Radio (live tour coverage and talk) are just a few available stations. And there are also sports giveaway contests, such as VIP tickets to see the New York Jets play at their training camp.

Those seeking comedy on the SiriusXM app will want to check out Comedy Central Radio, Kevin Hart’s Laugh Out Loud Radio, Raw Comedy (uncensored), Pure Comedy (comedy for the entire family), and Comedy Classics. Yet another recent SiriusXM giveaway contest: an all-expense-paid trip to see Kevin Hart in Los Angeles. News junkies, meanwhile, will appreciate stations from the BBC, CNN, NPR, Fox News, and C-Span, among many others.

There are also several off-the-beaten-path channels on the app. These include Mental Health Radio (by NYU’s Langone Health), Road Dog Trucking (all things relating to the trucking industry), and Rural Radio (agricultural and other issues affecting rural America and Canada).

There’s also plenty of exclusive content to check out beyond Howard Stern such as music stations DJ’d by artists and celebrities and audio and video clips of interviews and musical performances recorded in SiriusXM’s studios. Recent videos that the app suggested for me included interviews of actor Matt Damon, comedian Will Arnet, musician Nelly Furtado, and actress Jamie Lee Curtis. Also recommended were musical performances by Upsahl and Common and Pete Rock, as well as several comedy clips by Jeff Lewis.

If all of the above were already not enough, the All Access plan also includes the full library of Pandora’s podcast stations.

SiriusXM app review: Apps and compatibility

The Sirius XM app is compatible with wireless streaming speakers from Sonos, Google, and Amazon (Image credit: Future)

• Slick and attractive design
• Smart channel surfing and playback features
• No specific track playback, but app learns what you like

I very much enjoyed using the SiriusXM app, which is continually updated and improved and is available for iOS and Android devices, smart TVs, and streaming devices from Apple, Roku, Amazon, and Google. It looks great, is user-friendly, and works well.

The app has three main tabs. Discover is broken down by content type and is where user-specific recommended content, including daily “morning picks” are displayed. The Discover tab is also where frequently and recently listened to channels are located.

Search allows for app-wide content searches and also displays trending and popular searches. Library is where you will find your designated favorite channels (including artist channels) and downloaded content. (You can locally download content that does not contain music.) Another Library tab feature is the ability for sports fans to add favorite teams so they can quickly access team-related information, programming, and contests.

The app does not allow users to search for and play a specific music track or create track-specific playlists as you can with Spotify, Apple Music, Tidal, Qobuz, and other services, though there is the ability to create what SiriusXM calls “artist-based” stations. To find such a station, just search for an artist in the app and a relevant station will typically appear in the search results. You can then train the app to better play more of what you like by selecting a thumbs-up or thumbs-down icon for each track played on that station.

A channel may play live and/or recorded content. Under one of the app’s default settings, “TuneStart,” music starts at the beginning of a track. This feature, which can also be disabled, facilitates channel surfing since you won’t call up a channel only to hear the end of the track.

The SiriusXM app generally lets users “skip” up to six times per hour for preprogrammed music and comedy channels. Outside of these channel types, skipping is not permitted on some channels and is unlimited on others.

SiriusXM app review: Sound and Video Quality

(Image credit: SiriusXM)

• Sound quality gets the job done
• No high-resolution or spatial audio
• Video looks great

The SiriusXM app offers Normal, High, and Maximum streaming quality settings for both audio and video. No technical specifications for compression format, bit rate, etc. are given for these classifications. Indeed, sample streams on Tidal and Qobuz, and Apple Music’s ALAC (lossless) files typically sounded better than streams over SiriusXM when I made listening comparisons. There are also no options for high-resolution audio or Atmos/spatial audio.

For video, moving from the app’s Normal to Maximum settings on my iPhone 14 Pro Max didn’t appreciably improve picture quality, even in full-screen mode – sharpness and color accuracy were great at all settings. It’s possible, however, that the Normal setting will be the best option for a stable stream if your cellular reception is poor.

Bottom line: For most people, the quality of the SiriusXM app’s audio and video streams will be more than adequate.

Should you subscribe to the SiriusXM app? Subscribe if...

You want an enormous content catalog: Most users will never come close to taking advantage of all of the content available under the All Access plan. If you seek lots of varied content, the app is for you.

You love The Howard Stern Show: SiriusXM is the only place where you will find Howard Stern’s shows and supplemental content. The app is a must for diehard Stern fans.

Don't subscribe if...

You want to be able to play specific tracks: The app does not allow you to play specific music tracks or make track-specific playlists. Look elsewhere if that’s important to you.

You want top audio quality: We prefer other streaming services in terms of audio performance. Look elsewhere if you seek the one with the highest level of sound quality.

• Which is the best music streaming service for you?

Pitaka MagEZ Car Mount Pro 2 Qi2 review

The Pitaka MagEZ Car Mount Pro 2 Qi2 is an understated but efficient in-car MagSafe wireless charger. It made a pleasant change from the dashboard-mounted phone cradle I was using, and I soon found myself wondering how I ever managed without a wireless charger in the car.

It costs $59.99 / £59.99 to buy the Pitaka MagEZ Car Mount Pro 2 Qi2 on the official Pikaka website and Amazon. It’s currently available to buy in the US and the UK but not in Australia. I road-tested it against another MagSafe car charger, to see if either had what it took to win the crown, so the stakes were high.

The MagEZ Car Mount Pro 2 Qi2 doesn't stand out when in situ. It's not overly large or shiny like some other car-mounted best iPhone chargers are because it has a slim, ovular-shaped profile. The charger, including the aramid fiber charging plate, measures 3.7 x 1.4 x 1.8 inches / 94 x 36.5 x 45mm. It comes with a USB-C cable, which I don't have a port for in my car, but this was easily resolved by purchasing a multi-port cigarette lighter adapter from Amazon.

The metal hook attachment was something I hadn't encountered before, and I was a little dubious about whether it would fit on my car vents; however, this feeling was fleeting in the end, as the hooks extended out a long way. Once I had used the screw collars at the back to pull the hooks back in and to fix the ball joint in place when I was happy with the position, I placed my phone on, which attached easily. I liked that the mount felt secure, but I was still able to reposition the charging pad easily if required.

My only niggle would be the cable position, as it comes out of the bottom of the charging plate, so I recommend purchasing some little stick-on cable tidy clips to stop it from interfering with access to the controls or shift stick.

I encounter plenty of pot-hole-infested British roads plus some gnarly speed bumps on my commute, so it was somewhat trial by fire for the MagSafe attachment. It did a superb job holding onto my phone, and I recall only one occasion of needing to retighten the collars, which isn't bad going considering the amount of jostling it had put up with.

The charging speed proved to be adequate, charging an iPhone 13 Pro from 0% to 30% in half an hour. This does put it slightly behind the ESR Qi2 Magnetic Wireless Car Charger in terms of charging time, as the ESR charged the same phone from 0% to 40% in thirty minutes. That's not to say that the Pitaka did badly, however.

I really enjoyed testing the Pitaka MagEZ Car Mount Pro 2 Qi2 and would gladly purchase one for myself. If you happen to be on the hunt for other iterations of MagSafe chargers, then I recommend checking out our selection of the best wireless chargers for some inspiration.

(Image credit: Future) Pitaka MagEZ Car Mount Pro 2 Qi2 review: Price & specs

(Image credit: Future) Should I buy the Pitaka MagEZ Car Mount Pro 2 Qi2? Buy it if…

You want peace of mind on bumpy roads
After a couple of months of testing on my daily commute, I didn't encounter any issues with the phone dismounting or the charger becoming unstable, which has been particularly impressive considering the road conditions here. So, if you're looking for a secure MagSafe charger, you won't be disappointed.

You want something inconspicuous
With an oval-shaped charging pad, a soft sheen finish, and no distracting lights, this car charger doesn't draw attention or cause distractions from reflections or bright lights whether your phone is in situ or not.

Don't buy it if…

You think your car vents won't be compatible
There's no true one-size-fits-all guarantee, so if you're concerned that the hooked attachment style might not suit your car, it may be safer to opt for a clip-on or stick-on MagSafe car charger instead.

You get irritated by untidy cables
It could be that it's more of an obstruction in my car, but the position of the cable makes it tricky to get to the dashboard controls and proves to be an occasional irritation when I switch gears. Some cable-tidy clips would likely resolve most of these issues, however.

Pitaka MagEZ Car Mount Pro 2 Qi2 review: Also consider

ESR Qi2 Magnetic Wireless Car Charger
If you have concerns about whether your car vents will accept the Pro2 Qi2's hooked attachment design, then this charger from ESR would make a good alternative. It has a clip-on design with a stabilizer attached and helpfully comes with a stick-on dashboard mount too, so there's plenty of flexibility with placement.View Deal

Beelink SER9 HX-370: 30-second review

The Beelink SER9 HX-370 mini PC is one of a new generation of mini PCs that pack larger desktop performance into a small form factor. This model has been designed around AI applications, with an AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX-370 processor at its heart with the processor boasting an impressive 12 cores and 24 threads. On paper, this all looks impressive, but it's only when you power up Adobe's Premiere Pro that you start to see just how well-equipped this new technology is for handling heavy computing tasks. The onboard Radeon RX Vega 8 graphics provides plenty of graphics processing for creative work, but even with the heft of the processor, the latest games, while smooth, lack some of the punch and smoothness of visuals that you expect from a larger system.

While small, the SER9 HX-370 still offers plenty of options when it comes to connectivity, including Wi-Fi 6E and a good selection of USB 3.2 ports, although some are a little dated. For both creative and office workers, the fact that it also supports three 4K displays via HDMI 2.1, DP and USB4 makes it a great choice if screen real estate is important.

The CPU and GPU are well specified for a mini PC and the power that the supply is boosted by the inclusion of a new generation AMD XDNA 2 NPU that introduces AI acceleration. This NPU chip can be used by applications designed for use with AI as well as enabling  machine learning and deep learning tasks. So if you want to delve into the world of TensorFlow or a similar platform, this could be a great starting point.

The SER9 HX-370 has many appealing features considering its small size; however, the features and performance come at a premium. The price is at the higher end for the best mini PCs we've reviewed, and the form factor will, of course, limit future upgrade options. 

Beelink SER9 HX-370: Price and availability

• How much does it cost?  $1249
• When is it out? Now
• Where can you get it? Widely available

The Beelink SER9 HX-370 is priced at $999 and $1,249, depending on the choice of internal SSD (500GB or 1TB SSD). It’s available directly from Beelink’s website by clicking here and through online retailers.

• Value: 4 / 5

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings) Beelink SER9 HX-370: Specs Beelink SER9 HX-370: Design

The Beelink SER9 HX-370 measures just 136mm x 136mm x 50mm, and despite its premium build, high-end processor, and features, its sleek, high-quality design is somewhat understated. A close inspection of the exterior reveals that the main all-metal case is elegantly designed, providing an instant premium feel. The weight, at 819g, while not heavy by any standards, is a bit more substantial than your average mini PC.

The casing — front, sides, and top — is made from a single piece of metal, with the base and back constructed from grey plastic, all of which is well finished and gives the impression that the device is robust enough to handle transport without issue. The exterior not only protects the internal components but also integrates with the internal cooling system. With large vents across the back and an aerated base, it's obvious the casing has been engineered to manage the high-performance internal processor and components.

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

Like many high-performance mini PCs, there are plenty of connectivity options. Across the front of the machine, there's the small power button, CLR CMOS, 3.5mm audio jack, USB Type-C 10Gbps, and a surprising addition: a row of four small holes, which are part of a dedicated microphone array. Around the back, there’s the DC input, USB4 40Gbps, HDMI 2.1 4K 120Hz, 3.5mm audio, USB 2.0 480Mbps, DP 1.4 4K 120Hz, LAN 2.5G, another USB 2.0 480Mbps, and a USB 3.2 10Gbps.

It’s actually a bit surprising for a model that packs in premium features to hold back on some connectivity options, especially with only a single USB4 port, which limits you to a single ultra-fast storage option and as it stands even with this single USB4 port the machine itsefl isn't optimsed for use with an eGPU.

• Design: 4 / 5

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings) Beelink SER9 HX-370: Features

While mini PCs are, by their very nature, compact, the number of features they can pack into their small forms is often impressive. Leading the features for the SER9 is the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX370 Processor, which uses AMD’s latest Zen 5 architecture, with a 12-core, 24-thread setup. What distinguishes this CPU is that it has been optimized for AI-driven tasks and applications. It also features a max boost clock of 5.1 GHz, making it an ideal choice for creative work where intense processing of graphics, images, and video is crucial.

The AI acceleration for the CPU comes via the NPU, a dedicated Neural Processing Unit AMD XDNA 2 NPU, which delivers 80 AI TOPS. For applications able to leverage AI-enhanced workloads, there’s a noticeable boost in performance over more traditional processing, as we've seen with Adobe apps and the advancements in video editing, 3D design, and processing.

As standard, the machine comes with 32GB of LPDDR5X RAM, clocked at 7500MHz, which should suffice for most tasks. Unlike most mini PCs, however, this RAM is integrated and cannot be upgraded.

Regarding graphics, the Ryzen CPU is paired with an AMD Radeon 890M, featuring 16 Compute Units and a clock speed of 2900MHz. This GPU is more than sufficient for most creative and high-intensity applications, but gamers may find it a little limiting. While the SER9 does have a USB4 port, it is not optimized for use with an eGPU, so the internal graphics will likely be the best option available.

In terms of storage, this is an area where the SER9 really stands out compared to other mini PCs. While you can attach ultra-fast external SSDs, there are two PCIe 4.0 x4 slots for SSD storage, supporting up to 8TB of internal storage. Our review version included a 1TB Crucial PCIe SSD, which proved to be extremely fast.

As with most high-performance mini PCs, internal cooling is a significant consideration. Beelink has designed the MSC2.0 cooling system, which uses a vapor chamber, a silent fan, and an SSD heatsink to manage the temperatures that can rise under heavy workloads.

When it comes to display options, the SER9 is capable of using one or all three different display port options to support up to three 4K displays. These options are HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4, and the USB4 ports. For connectivity, aside from the 2.5Gb wired LAN connection, the system features Wi-Fi 6 (Intel AX200) and Bluetooth 5.2.

On the audio side, there are two 3.5mm audio ports, one on the front and another on the back for headphone or a mic. Interestingly there are also built-in dual speakers which is again an unusual option for this type of mini PC. Another interesting, and quite unique audio feature are the front-facing microphones.  These enable AI-powered voice interaction, providing smart audio pickup for voice command recognition for different tasks.

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

• Features: 4.5 / 5

Beelink SER9 HX-370: Performance

The SER9 HX-370 is a high-performance mini PC, and that's evident from the outset, with Microsoft Office apps and using Google Docs through the browser, all running at speed with no slowdown or issues. This machine definitely has processing power, and as you switch between applications, that speed really becomes apparent.

Benchmark results show that the Beelink SER9 HX-370 offers solid all-round performance for office tasks, creative work, and some gaming, thanks to the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX370 processor, 32GB of LPDDR5X RAM, and integrated AMD Radeon 890M graphics.

In everyday tasks, the machine's performance was reflected in the benchmarks, with a Geekbench CPU Single score of 14,728 and a PCMark score of 7,205. These scores reflect well with the real world use of applications such as Microsoft Word, Excel, and Google Docs (Through Chrome).

For creative applications like Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom, the machine easily handled multiple RAW files from the Sony A7 IV and Canon EOS R5 C, with this performance again reflected in the Geekbench Compute score of 42,770. Switching to Adobe Premiere Pro and DaVinci Resolve for some 4K video editing, the machine again impressed with speed, although the 1TB SSD was a little small and a Samsung EVO T5 was used to expand on the capacity through the USB4 port. However, there was also the option to upgrade the internal storage to an impressive 8 TB, which again is quite a unique feature for a machine of this size. The easy handling of video editing was reflected in the Cinebench CPU Multi score of 21,718 and Cinebench CPU Single score of 2,045.

To truly test the performance, a few games were tried, including Hogwarts Legacy, Tekken 8, and Red Dead Redemption 2. Again, the small machine impressed, although it's unfortunate that the system hasn't been optimised for use with an external GPU. Still, with the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, performance was impressive, with all games running smoothly, though some slight reductions in quality settings to around medium were necessary. The 3DMark scores (Fire Strike Graphics: 10,256, Time Spy Graphics: 3,666, Fire Strike Overall: 9,384, and Wild Life: 23,206) all reflect the system’s solid gaming performance.

Another point to note on the performance is the speed of the internal SSD. In the benchmark test using CrystalDiskMark, the score showed read/write speeds of 5175.50 MB/s and 4751.30 MB/s. This is extremely fast and ideal for any application that requires high speed disk access.

Overall, the performance of the Beelink SER9 HX-370 is impressive, easily handling office applications and taking on processor-intensive creative tasks. While the machine was able to handle gaming smoothly, the best gameplay was achieved with medium graphic settings, but for a mini PC, this is extremely impressive.

• Performance: 5 / 5

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings) Beelink SER9 HX-370: Final verdict

(Image credit: Alastair Jennings)

The Beelink SER9 HX-370 is a powerful mini PC that combines compact size with desktop-level performance. Ideal for gaming, creative applications, and heavy multitasking, it offers exceptional value for its price. While its gamer-centric design might not appeal to everyone, its performance and versatility make it a standout choice.

Should I buy a Beelink SER9 HX-370? Buy it if... Don't buy it if...

Gtech Orca cordless hard floor cleaner: two-minute review

UK-founded Gtech produces a range of excellent cordless products, from power tools and garden gear to vacuum cleaners and, in this instance, the company’s first ever cordless wet-and-dry hard floor cleaner.

The Gtech Orca Hard Floor Cleaner is only available in white and it’s the perfect partner to the superb Gtech AirRAM 3 cordless upright vacuum cleaner I have already reviewed. With its neat styling and very discrete charging base/self-cleaning plinth, the Orca looks smart enough to be stored somewhere practical rather than having to be hidden away behind closed doors.

Like many of today's best wet-dry vacuum cleaners, the Orca offers a balance of wet mopping and light vacuuming, making it a very decent choice for households with extensive hard flooring. While it might not be as thorough as a standard mop and bucket or have as many bells-and-whistles as some premium models on the market, I can guarantee that it will save you loads of time and hassle when it comes to disappearing large liquid spills of almost any variety, including the kind of stuff you would absolutely not want to tackle with a roll of paper towels.

Granted, there are one or two design anomalies that I would like to see improved on subsequent models but when it comes to performance, this one is well up there with the best of the competition. If you’re looking for an efficient hard floor cleaner that saves a ton of time and effort, the Gtech Orca is well worth a punt.

Gtech Orca review: price & availability

• Price: £349.99
• Launched: June 2024
• Available: UK only

The Gtech Orca’s £350 price tag comfortably reflects its slew of features like cordless operation, dual water tanks and motorised roller for scrubbing. That said, it is quite expensive when compared to products like the lower-priced Vax ONEPWR Glide 2 (£250) or new Bissell HF3 (£300).

In fact, its pricing is almost in line with a premium model like the Tineco Floor One S5 (£399.99) which has far more smarts on board, including automatic adjustment of cleaning based on how dirty the floor is. Although it's nowhere near as pricey as the Dyson WashG1, nor the Tineco Floor One S7 Pro.

Sadly I’ve found no evidence of the Gtech Orca on sale in the US but it’s available at plenty of online stores in the UK. If you fancy joining the Gtech bandwagon, consider buying yourself an Orca direct from Gtech, Amazon, B&Q, AO or Wilko.

• Value for money score: 3.5 out of 5

Gtech Orca hard floor cleaner specs Gtech Orca review: design

• Decent water tank sizes
• Efficient self cleaning
• Poorly positioned on/off trigger

Manually mopping floors is a very messy and extremely energy- and time-intensive household chore, not to mention ineffective at tackling large liquid spillages. The Gtech Orca is here to solve both of those problems.

Like other similarly-styled cordless hard floor cleaners on the market, the Orca serves as both a wet mop and light-duty vacuum cleaner that uses the combination of a revolving towel brush and a mix of fresh sanitised water with floor-cleaning solution to perform a range of hard floor cleaning duties, from general spruce-ups and stain removal to collecting large liquid spills of almost any variety.

And because it includes a vacuum feature, any excess water on the floor is sucked into a dirty water tank, which you then empty down the toilet or sink. When it comes to 21st Century mopping, there’s nothing like having one of these revolutionary machines to hand.

The Orca is remarkably smart looking compared to the competition (Image credit: Future)

So what’s so special about the Orca? Truth is it’s no better or worse than much of the competition when it comes to cleaning performance, though I have to say it’s a much better looker than most others on the market (bar, perhaps, Tineco, which is arguably the most popular of hard floor cleaner brands).

In fact, I’m rather liking the Orca’s sleek, modern and compact aesthetic. It blends well with most household interiors without sticking out like a sore thumb. Put another way, I have no problem sitting this machine within easy reach rather than tucking it away under the stairs.

However, there are a few design anomalies I’m not that keen on. I’ll start at the very top – the handle and interface. Most hard floor cleaners have a finger trigger under the push handle, which is designed to boost water levels to the brush head for deeper cleaning of ingrained stains. By contrast, the Orca’s trigger is used solely for turning it on and off, and this poses an issue when in use because the trigger is positioned in such a way that one’s finger accidentally rests on it while pushing and pulling.

The result? It turns the machine off on a regular basis. The solution? Make sure to grip the handle further back or remember to keep your finger away from the trigger.

There's a small LCD screen to provide information (Image credit: Future)

Actually, I’m surprised that this model has only one level of water dispensation because there may be times when you want more aqua to hand. As it stands, the small LCD screen on top of the handle provides just three options – ‘Sterilising Water’, ‘Eco Vacuum’ and ‘Max Vacuum’. Confusingly, the first option is actually the main cleaning mode, where water is dispensed and collected via the vacuum function.

According to the blurb, the Gtech Orca ‘generates sanitised water eliminating bacteria, viruses and spores, as well as odours for a hygienic clean’. I’ll take that, whatever it means.

The other two options are simply different levels of vacuum where no water is dispensed. I should add at this juncture that this machine isn’t a bona fide dry-work vacuum cleaner, although it will devour most things in its path. It'll need to be supplemented with a dedicated vacuum (head to TechRadar's best cordless vacuum guide for some recommendations there).

The water tanks are generously sized (Image credit: Future)

Heading downwards, you’ll find the 700ml dirty water tank and, just behind it on the other side of the unit, the 800ml clean water tank. This latter tank is actually quite a bit bigger than the competition and that means fewer trips to the tap for refills.

This brings me to another design fault. Since the filler cap for the water tank is positioned on the back of the tank, with the filler marks on the front, it’s very difficult to fill this thing to the right level without causing splashback all over the sink.

While Gtech provides 300ml of its own hard floor solution with the package (about £5 for a replacement), the Orca doesn’t come with a separate solution reservoir like some models, so you need to add a few capfuls to the main tank. Both tanks are easy to fit, though you do need to give them a really firm press until you hear a reassuring click. If you don’t, chances are one of the tanks will pop off while in use.

The towelling roller runs almost to the edge of the floorhead (Image credit: Future)

Like the vast majority of hard floor cleaners, the Orca is equipped with a single 24.5cm towelling roller that spins at a decent rate of knots, sucking up all manner of detritus in the process. And because the roller is almost flush to one side of the unit, this model is very good at edge cleaning, too.

One of the very best things about this new generation of hard floor cleaners is the way they’re able to self clean their brush rollers and internal piping. Simply drop the Orca on its small 30cm x 28cm cleaning plinth and tap the ‘self clean’ button located at the very top of the handle.

You have two levels of self cleaning at your disposal: 85 seconds for Standard and 125 seconds for Deep Clean. And by clean I mean really clean – as if the brush roller had never seen a dirty floor. Top marks here.

Naturally there will be some matted hair deposits and other gunk under the roller’s magnetic protective cover, but this can be easily removed for a quick rinse under a tap. Likewise, the roller itself can also be removed for easy access to the main suction tube. To be honest you will only need to engage in this type of maintenance once every week or so and it’s not too messy a business.

The Orca feels light in the hand and is easy to manoeuvre (Image credit: Future)

At 4.1 kilos, the Orca feels pretty light to carry and its motorised head articulates at a very wide angle to make manoeuvrability a cinch when cleaning along edges and around furniture. At 115cm in height, 28.5cm in width and 23cm in depth, it’s a great size for all users and its overall construction feels sturdy and durable, too.

In terms of running time, the battery provided about 20 minutes of wet mopping before needing a recharge, and between 20 and 40 minutes of vacuuming depending on whether it was set to 'Max Vacuum’ or 'Eco Vacuum' mode. However, it should be noted that the brush roller will always be damp so, as alluded to above, the vacuum modes are essentially for collecting large liquid spills and not for general vacuuming duties.

A row of green charging LEDs kept me in the loop and when finished I simply plonked the Orca on its charging plinth, tapped the self-clean button and left it to recharge for just under five hours.

• Design score: 3.5 out of 5

Gtech Orca review: performance

• Excellent mopping performance
• Great suction on bigger spills
• Easy to manoeuvre

Before I get into the Gtech Orca’s performance ratings, I should first mention the types of flooring this model and others like it are suitable for. Clearly, well-sealed materials like linoleum and tile are perfect for a model like the Orca, but bear in mind that the stiff roller will unlikely reach any recessed grouting.

When it comes to wooden floors, you can happily use the Orca on thicker engineered flooring, but I would be careful with standard laminate since the water dispensed will inevitably find its way into the cracks and possibly cause noticeable expansion in the joints. The secret for all hard floors is to not spend too much time in one spot and switch to the vacuum mode to suck up as much remaining moisture as possible. (Here's more on how to clean a hardwood floor.)

Also be mindful if using this machine on polished concrete flooring and do not use anything other than plain water in the tank. This is because concrete is a calcium-based product, so it can be easily damaged by acidic or alkaline cleaning solutions.

Before I get to my official tests, a quick shout out to the developers for making this model so easy to push, pull and steer. It really is a very pleasant thing to use and, at just 73 decibels, it’s remarkably quiet, too.

My sticky spillage test before (left) and after one pass with the Orca (Image credit: Future)

My first test involved the removal of dried soy sauce and honey on my utility room’s tiled flooring. It removed all visible traces in one forward sweep but I still had to perform another three sweeps to remove any invisible sticky residue.

I should also add that most cordless hard floor cleaners struggle with cleaning up heavily ingrained stains. In this instance the best course of action is a bowl of hot water, a scrubbing brush and a pair of knees.

Image 1 of 2

My food spillage test before... (Image credit: Future)Image 2 of 2

... and after one pass with the Orca (Image credit: Future)

Test two required a mashed-up cocktail of various food ingredients that no-one in their right mind would wish to encounter on any given day – a broken egg, a squirt of brown sauce and a sprinkling of raw oats and Crunchy Nut cereal. I didn’t hold out much hope for this test, but strike me down with a feather if it didn’t remove 80 per cent of the offending matter – including most of the eggshell – in one forward push, and the rest of it after a couple more forward and backward motions.

Test three wasn’t an official test, in fact it was a pet accident. Nevertheless, I feel the urge to include it because this type of real-world scenario is exactly what a machine like this was designed for. Before reading the following I would refrain from eating anything because it might not stay down.

In a nutshell, one of my lovely Labradors had been eating grass on the way back from a run and then drank copious amounts of water on our return. You can guess what’s coming but thankfully it was completely clear apart from a few blades of grass. There was a huge amount of it on my wooden floor and, worst of all, it was extraordinarily slimy. Normally I would reach for 10 sheets of Blitz – the only paper towel to have in the home if you’re a pet owner – or, disgustingly, a squeegee and dustpan. But not this time.

Thankfully the Orca arrived partly charged so I steered it over to the offending mess, turned it on and – mind blown – the whole lot disappeared with a strangely satisfying but slightly wretch-inducing whoomph. And that was that. All I had to do was head over to the loo and pour the offending matter down the bowl before putting the whole unit on its cleaning base and selecting its most intensive clean. As revolting as this sounds, I can tell you that, from my own experience, every other alternative cleaning method in a worst-case scenario like this would be, well, infinitely worse.

A self-clean mode helps keep the floorhead fresh (Image credit: Future)

Right, you can get back to your lunch now because that’s all I have to report. Should you buy the Gtech Orca despite some of its irritating design traits? I’d say a resounding yes. It’s simple to manoeuvre, light in the hand, super easy to store and, above all, it performs exceedingly well in pretty much all hard floor cleaning disciplines.

• Performance score: 4.5 out of 5

Should I buy the Gtech Orca? Buy it if...

You have lots of hard flooring

This is a perfect machine for keeping hard floors clean and looking swish. It's low-effort, can tackle daily cleans and larger messes, and the self-clean feature is excellent too.

You have pets or clumsy housemates

The Orca can handle all kinds of solid and liquid spillages, with its combination of wet mopping and light vacuuming.

You need to tackle awkward spaces

The Orca is impressively easy to manoeuvre for a wet-dry vacuum, and the floorhead design will clean right up to the edges of rooms, too.

Don't buy it if...

Most of your home is carpeted

It won't replace a vacuum cleaner for dry cleaning, so there's no real point in a machine like this unless you have a decent amount of hard flooring.

You want smart features

The self-cleaning function is about as clever as this model gets – there aren't even different hydration levels to pick from. Something like the Tineco Floor One S5 offers more in terms of automation.

How I tested the Gtech Orca

I’m personally a big fan of cordless hard floor cleaners, mostly because I’ve endured quite a few spillage and pet-induced scenarios and all of them have been dealt with swiftly and efficiently.

I’ve been using the Orca for general cleaning of my kitchen, dining room and utility room and it’s been a pretty effortless experience. I know it’s working well simply by the brown colour of the water in its container. It also leaves far less moisture behind than a mop and bucket.

However, I was most surprised by how amazingly well the Orca dealt with collecting the large pieces of broken eggshell in my main spillage test. I was also gobsmacked – and rather relieved – by the efficiency with which it collected my dog’s regurgitated watery mix. This event alone was more than enough of a success to give it 4.5 stars out of five for overall performance.

• First reviewed: October 2024

Ugreen 5000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank review

Ugreen is a relative newcomer in the charging scene, offering similar products and designs to those of Anker. Anyone who’s familiar with that brand’s magnetic power banks will notice the similarities here, with the Ugreen 5000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank being one example.

It sports a minimal and sleek design, with smooth edges and a smart-looking off-white color (it’s also available in black). As for the interface, there’s a single button and no display – the only readout you get comes in the form of five LEDs that indicate battery level and charging status.

Similar to many of the best power banks for portability, the Ugreen 5000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank has a slim profile, which it’s able to achieve thanks to its 5,000mAh capacity. This also means it’s light, tipping the scales at just 5.11oz (145g) – although its chief rival, the Anker 621, is slightly leaner at 4.56oz (129g).

The MagSafe charging area is designed to wirelessly charge the best iPhones. It uses the Qi standard and has an output of 7.5W. During my tests, it managed to charge an iPhone 13 Pro from 50% to 100% in about an hour and forty-five minutes, losing about half of its own battery charge in the process. This puts it on a par with the aforementioned Anker 621.

However, what fails to impress is the silicone pad, as it already began showing signs of wear during my time with it. This occurred in just over a week, so this rate of deterioration doesn’t bode well. It could be argued that any rubberized pad will be susceptible to damage like this, but all I can say is that I didn’t experience the same with the PU leather material on the Anker 621. It also picks up dust and debris very easily – again, not something I witnessed with the 621.

There’s only one USB-C port on the Ugreen 5000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank, which delivers 15W of power. This managed to charge a half-full Google Pixel 7a in just over an hour, depleting about half of its battery once more. Charging the bank itself from empty to full took just over two hours, which is reasonable.

The Ugreen 5000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank costs $29 / £29 / $AU49, making it cheaper than the Anker 621, which costs $39 / £44 (about $AU57). However, the 621 comes in multiple colorways, whereas the Ugreen only comes in black or white, and the overall build quality does seem to be better, which is why we prefer the Anker model over Ugreen’s.

(Image credit: Future) Ugreen 5000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank review: price & specs

(Image credit: Future) Should I buy the Ugreen 5000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank? Buy it if…

You want something simple
Simply place your MagSafe iPhone on the pad, or plug in any other device via the USB-C port, and you’re away.

You want something cheap
Ugreen undercuts its nearest rival, Anker, by a decent amount, making it a more tempting purchase.

Don't buy it if…

You want something durable
Even during my limited time with the Ugreen 5000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank, it began to show signs of wear, which isn’t promising for its long-term prospects.

You have an Android
While MagSafe-compatible Android cases may allow you to use the wireless charging function, it’s not guaranteed to work.

Ugreen 5000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank review: Also consider

Anker 621 Magnetic Battery (MagGo)
The Anker 621 is very similar to the Ugreen 5000mAh Magnetic Wireless Power Bank, with a near-identical design and feature set. Even though it’s slightly more expensive, we do think the extra cost is worth it, as it proved more durable during our tests, with the PU leather pad maintaining its pristine condition throughout. View Deal