The promise of AI-integrated homes has long included convenience, automation, and efficiency, however, a new study from researchers at Tel Aviv University has exposed a more unsettling reality.
In what may be the first known real-world example of a successful AI prompt-injection attack, the team manipulated a Gemini-powered smart home using nothing more than a compromised Google Calendar entry.
The attack exploited Gemini’s integration with the entire Google ecosystem, particularly its ability to access calendar events, interpret natural language prompts, and control connected smart devices.
From scheduling to sabotage: exploiting everyday AI accessGemini, though limited in autonomy, has enough “agentic capabilities” to execute commands on smart home systems.
That connectivity became a liability when the researchers inserted malicious instructions into a calendar appointment, masked as a regular event.
When the user later asked Gemini to summarize their schedule, it inadvertently triggered the hidden instructions.
The embedded command included instructions for Gemini to act as a Google Home agent, lying dormant until a common phrase like “thanks” or “sure” was typed by the user.
At that point, Gemini activated smart devices such as lights, shutters, and even a boiler, none of which the user had authorized at that moment.
These delayed triggers were particularly effective in bypassing existing defenses and confusing the source of the actions.
This method, dubbed “promptware,” raises serious concerns about how AI interfaces interpret user input and external data.
The researchers argue that such prompt-injection attacks represent a growing class of threats that blend social engineering with automation.
They demonstrated that this technique could go far beyond controlling devices.
It could also be used to delete appointments, send spam, or open malicious websites, steps that could lead directly to identity theft or malware infection.
The research team coordinated with Google to disclose the vulnerability, and in response, the company accelerated the rollout of new protections against prompt-injection attacks, including added scrutiny for calendar events and extra confirmations for sensitive actions.
Still, questions remain about how scalable these fixes are, especially as Gemini and other AI systems gain more control over personal data and devices.
Unfortunately, traditional security suites and firewall protection are not designed for this kind of attack vector.
To stay safe, users should limit what AI tools and assistants like Gemini can access, especially calendars and smart home controls.
Also, avoid storing sensitive or complex instructions in calendar events, and don’t allow AI to act on them without oversight.
Be alert to unusual behavior from smart devices and disconnect access if anything seems off.
Via Wired
You might also likeIn East Tennessee, a 3D printer arm has been used to build concrete shielding columns for a nuclear reactor.
The work is part of the Hermes Low-Power Demonstration Reactor project, supported by the US Department of Energy, and marks a new direction in how nuclear infrastructure is built, with both 3D printing and AI tools playing major roles.
And according to Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), large parts of the construction were completed in just 14 days, which could have taken several weeks using conventional methods.
Efficiency gains clash with engineering cautionThe new method uses 3D printers to create detailed molds for casting concrete, even in complex shapes, with the goal of making construction faster, cheaper, and more flexible while relying more on US-based materials and labor.
AI tools also played a role in the project, as ORNL used the technology to guide parts of the design and building process.
These tools may help reduce human error and speed up work, especially when creating difficult or unique parts, but depending heavily on AI also raises questions. How can builders be sure these systems won’t make unnoticed mistakes? Who checks the decisions that are automated?
The project is also a response to rising energy demands - as AI systems and data centers use more power, nuclear energy is seen as a stable source to support them.
Some experts say that future AI tools may end up running on power from reactors they helped design, a feedback loop that could be both efficient and risky.
The use of 3D printing in this project makes it possible to build precise structures faster.
Still, it’s not yet clear how well these 3D-printed parts will hold up over time.
Nuclear reactors need to last for decades, and failure in any part of the structure could be dangerous. Testing and quality checks must keep up with the speed of new building methods.
For now, 3D printing and AI seem to offer powerful tools for the nuclear industry.
But while faster construction is a major benefit, safety must remain the top concern - this “new era” may bring improvements, but it will need close attention and caution at every step.
Via Toms Hardware
You might also likeThe Pixel Watch 4 is almost certainly going to be unveiled alongside the Pixel 10 series and the Pixel Buds 2a on Wednesday, August 20 – though Google has only confirmed the date, not what's being launched – and a new leak gives us more information on the wearable.
Images posted to Reddit (via 9to5Google) show what look to be official marketing slides for the Pixel Watch 4, detailing features such as improved durability, battery life, and activity tracking accuracy – courtesy of a "Gen 3 sensor hub".
That would be an upgrade on the sensors we saw with the Google Pixel Watch 3, and should mean better precision in readings such as heart rate – though we won't know for sure until we've actually had an opportunity to try it out.
We also get another look at the rather unusual side charging system that showed up in an earlier leak, with charge contacts positioned on the side of the watch casing: it would appear this is how you'll be able to charge up the Pixel Watch 4.
'Technological advancements'The Pixel Watch 3 was launched in August 2024 (Image credit: Google)There's plenty of positive phrasing in these marketing materials, as you would expect. The watch apparently brings "significant technological advancements" over its predecessor, together with a "premium crafted design".
The battery life is listed as reaching 30 hours between charges, which is said to be a 25% boost over the current model. Better battery life had already been mentioned in previous leaks, so we're hopeful in that particular department.
There's also mention of the two expected watch sizes, 41 mm and 42 mm, while Gemini integration is mentioned, as well as "dual frequency" GPS – which suggests the wearable will be more accurate and faster in reporting its location.
Together with the rest of the leaked information that's also emerged in recent days, it looks as though the Pixel Watch 4 could be an appealing prospect, when it's finally confirmed – and perhaps worth a spot on our best smartwatches list.
You might also like