Error message

  • Warning: date_timezone_set() expects parameter 1 to be DateTime, bool given in format_date() (line 2062 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Warning: date_format() expects parameter 1 to be DateTimeInterface, bool given in format_date() (line 2072 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Warning: date_timezone_set() expects parameter 1 to be DateTime, bool given in format_date() (line 2062 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Warning: date_format() expects parameter 1 to be DateTimeInterface, bool given in format_date() (line 2072 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Warning: date_timezone_set() expects parameter 1 to be DateTime, bool given in format_date() (line 2062 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Warning: date_format() expects parameter 1 to be DateTimeInterface, bool given in format_date() (line 2072 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Warning: date_timezone_set() expects parameter 1 to be DateTime, bool given in format_date() (line 2062 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Warning: date_format() expects parameter 1 to be DateTimeInterface, bool given in format_date() (line 2072 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Warning: date_timezone_set() expects parameter 1 to be DateTime, bool given in format_date() (line 2062 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Warning: date_format() expects parameter 1 to be DateTimeInterface, bool given in format_date() (line 2072 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Warning: date_timezone_set() expects parameter 1 to be DateTime, bool given in format_date() (line 2062 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Warning: date_format() expects parameter 1 to be DateTimeInterface, bool given in format_date() (line 2072 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Warning: date_timezone_set() expects parameter 1 to be DateTime, bool given in format_date() (line 2062 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Warning: date_format() expects parameter 1 to be DateTimeInterface, bool given in format_date() (line 2072 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Deprecated function: implode(): Passing glue string after array is deprecated. Swap the parameters in drupal_get_feeds() (line 394 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Deprecated function: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in menu_set_active_trail() (line 2405 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/menu.inc).

Technology

New forum topics

These impressive new smart glasses with a screen put Meta on notice

TechRadar News - Tue, 08/26/2025 - 13:00
  • Rokid Glasses are launching internationally
  • They’re set to cost $599 (around £355 / AU$920) and launch in November
  • These are cheaper, but arriving later than Meta's rumored smart glasses with a display

We’re just a couple of weeks out from Meta Connect, where we’ll likely see the company’s first Ray-Ban smart glasses with a display, but a rival has beaten them to the punch with a pair of specs that look to go toe-to-toe with what Meta’s offering.

That’s because we just had the international launch event for the Rokid Glasses, which are up now on Kickstarter if you want to score a pair with a limited-time discount (ranging from 20 to 15% depending on which early bird deal you can snag).

At a glance, they share a lot of similarities with Meta’s existing smart specs – we’re talking a 12MP camera, open-ear speakers, and a Qualcomm Snapdragon AR1 chipset. You’ll also get an onboard AI assistant, which is “ChatGPT 5 empowered,” if you have an internet connection.

These Rokid glasses take things up a notch, however, as they also boast a pair of Micro LED waveguide displays that serve as a heads-up display for directions, real-time translation, and as a prompter.

(Image credit: Rokid)

Another feature teased by promotional imagery is that the glasses can – just like Meta’s smart specs – identify things you can see when requested. Still, with the display, they’ll also highlight what they’ve identified. This would be very handy for making sure there’s no confusion between what you wanted to know more about and what the glasses are informing you on.

These screens look to appear conveniently in your vision – but a little out of the way to not be too distracting – though they’re not full-color. You can only see green text and shapes.

Regardless, it certainly seems like Rokid’s specs could be a real winner if they can live up to the hype. Especially because – even before any early-bird discounts – they’re set to cost $599 (around £355 / AU$920).

That’s considerably less than the $800 (£590 / AU$1,230) Meta’s specs are rumored to cost.

Image 1 of 2

(Image credit: Rokid)Image 2 of 2

(Image credit: Rokid)

I wouldn’t count Meta out yet, however, as in the smart glasses race, they have a proven track record with some very stylish (yet functional) specs with both its Ray-Ban and more recently its Oakley collaborations.

What’s more, rumors suggest Meta’s glasses will boast a full-color display – though it’ll only be visible to a single eye. This, however, would make it a more versatile screen.

As for the price difference, when you factor in that Meta’s specs always come with a charging case (so presumably its new model would too) then it’s only set to be about $100 pricier, as Rokid’s glasses with a charging case will set you back $698 (around £395 / AU$1,075).

It’s also likely Meta’s specs will actually arrive sooner, as Connect is in September and the tech typically launches within a month after. The Rokid Glasses aren’t being shipped from Kickstarter until November.

(Image credit: Oakley / Meta)

While this launch doesn’t expose a clear winner or loser between Rokid and Meta, it does highlight that the smart glasses game isn’t set to be a one-horse race – certainly not to the degree that VR has felt the past few years.

We’ll have to wait and see what Meta debuts at Meta Connect, and as always, we’ll have to test both glasses out before issuing our final verdict – but Rokid’s specs look impressive, and if it can stick the landing, Meta (and anyone looking to buy a pair of smart specs) will want to pay attention.

You might also like
Categories: Technology

Verizon's Bringing Back That Landline Feeling With Its New Family Plan Feature

CNET News - Tue, 08/26/2025 - 12:55
Instead of ringing your house, a shared phone number can ring up to five phones.
Categories: Technology

Apple TV Plus Offers 54% Discount After Uptick in Cancellations

CNET News - Tue, 08/26/2025 - 12:52
That's $6 for two months.
Categories: Technology

LG just released a 49-inch 5K monitor but fails to include any Thunderbolt ports - and I just can't understand why

TechRadar News - Tue, 08/26/2025 - 12:36
  • 49-inch UltraWide monitor appears on LG’s Singapore English website
  • Connectivity includes USB-C charging but Thunderbolt support is surprisingly absent
  • 32:9 curved Nano IPS panel offers 5120x1440 resolution single screen alternative

LG has quietly listed a new 49-inch UltraWide monitor on its Singapore English website ahead of a potential worldwide release.

The new 49U950A-W monitor combines a 32:9 curved Nano IPS panel with a 5120x1440 resolution, and is designed as a single screen alternative to dual setups.

The display supports a maximum refresh rate of 144Hz, making it ideal creative work, and comes with two HDMI 2.0 ports, DisplayPort 1.4, a USB hub, and a USB-C input with support for 90W power delivery. The USB-C connection allows display output, charging, and data transfer

No Thunderbolt ports

There’s no Thunderbolt port on this monitor though, limiting bandwidth and daisy chaining options, which is particularly disappointing, given LG’s 40-inch UltraFine monitor, released in June 2025, came with Thunderbolt 5 support.

The new screen includes adaptive sync support with AMD FreeSync Premium Pro and Nvidia G-SYNC compatibility. Response times are rated at 5ms gray-to-gray, with an additional motion blur reduction option.

Color reproduction reaches 98 percent of the DCI-P3 spectrum. Factory calibration is provided, brightness is listed at 400 nits, and VESA DisplayHDR 400 compliance offers modest high dynamic range capability.

While it is not aimed at the top end of HDR performance, it does provide improved contrast and highlights compared with standard panels.

The monitor incorporates tilt, height, and swivel adjustments, and supports a 100x100mm VESA mount.

A light sensor enables automatic brightness control, while TÜV Rheinland certification for low blue light should help ease eye strain during extended use.

The display includes picture-in-picture and picture-by-picture layouts, a software-based dual controller feature, and app-driven screen splitting.

There are built-in 10W stereo speakers with extended bass too.

The new 49U950A-W is priced at S$2,299 (Singapore dollars) approximately US$1,790, but there’s no word on when it will go on sale globally.

(Image credit: LG)You might also like
Categories: Technology

YouTube TV Subscribers Could Lose NFL and College Football Without a Deal by Tomorrow Night

CNET News - Tue, 08/26/2025 - 11:55
Fox channels will be pulled from YouTube TV tomorrow unless Google and Fox can end their dispute.
Categories: Technology

Why won't AirPods Max 2 be at the newly announced September Apple Event yet again? A report says they're 'too popular' to kill and 'not popular enough' to prioritize

TechRadar News - Tue, 08/26/2025 - 11:49
  • AirPods Max 2 not expected until at least 2027
  • AirPods Pro 3 predicted again for late 2025
  • AirPods Max reportedly don't sell enough to justify investment

If you're hoping for an AirPods Max 2 announcement at the big Apple event on September 9th 2025, prepare to be disappointed: the next generation of Apple's over-ears isn't expected to arrive until at least 2027.

That's an eternity in tech terms: the original AirPods Max launched in 2020. But it seems that Apple is stuck between a rock and a hard place.

According to Bloomberg, the problem is simple: AirPods Max are "too popular for Apple to stop selling them, and not popular enough for the company to invest a ton of time and money into creating a new version" – after all, there's the AirPods Pro 3 to work on instead.

What are Apple's AirPods Max 2 and AirPods Pro 3 plans?

As ever with unannounced Apple products we're dealing with leaks, rumors and predictions here. But it looks like AirPods Pro 3 are coming soon and AirPods Max 2 are coming later than hoped.

Bloomberg says that the AirPods Pro 3 are due to launch before the end of 2025 – let's hope we hear about them at the iPhone 17 event – with similar heart rate monitoring to the Powerbeats Pro 2.

As for the current AirPods Max, their most recent update was a damp squib: they got USB-C to comply with EU legislation, and that was as far as new hardware features went – though this did enable lossless wired audio support, and we think it works pretty great, actually.

The hoped-for H2 chip upgrade, which would have put them on a par with AirPods Pro 2, didn't feature. AirPods Max, unlike many premium headphones, still don't do wireless lossless audio, and having an older chip means they're missing many of the features of AirPods Pro 2.

After five years of daily wear, my OG AirPods Max are prime candidates for replacement: the headband's getting baggy, the tight fit – I have a huge head – is mildly annoying now, having to find a Lightning cable or adapter when everything else in my life is USB-C is a pain.

But I'm not interested in paying a premium price for tech that's half a decade old now, especially when the best headphones from other firms are improving significantly with each new release. I wonder how many other AirPods Max owners are likely to switch to rival brands before the second generation arrives…

You might also like
Categories: Technology

Horrifying AI Crowds Apparently Used in Will Smith Concert Video

CNET News - Tue, 08/26/2025 - 11:44
You can't unsee the mass of AI-generated human carnage cheering on the performer.
Categories: Technology

Leica M11-V leak suggests controversial camera could be the cheapest M series yet

TechRadar News - Tue, 08/26/2025 - 11:35
  • Leica M11-V could be the most affordable M series model yet
  • New leak claims it will have 64GB of internal storage and 60MP full-frame sensor
  • Electronic viewfinder set to replace iconic rangefinder

A new leak may have revealed the interesting features we can expect from the upcoming Leica M11-V – and has also seemingly confirmed that it will be the legendary manufacturer’s first M series model to come without the iconic rangefinder component.

Leica Rumors has posted what appears to be a marketing information page about the rumored camera which, if genuine, supports previous claims that the M11-V would be replacing a rangefinder with an electronic viewfinder.

This is likely to be a controversial decision among Leica aficionados – potentially the camera world’s most vocal, dedicated and opinionated fanbase. After all, the “Messsucher” (the German word for a combined rangefinder and viewfinder) is what gives the M series its name.

I’ve already written an op-ed pre-emptively opining the rangefinder’s loss, but looking at this recent leak has left me much happier about the M11-V launch – because it looks set to be Leica’s most affordable M series model yet.

A view to a cheaper M series?

The current Leica M11, part of a legendary series of digital cameras that utilizes a rangefinder for composing shots and manual focusing. (Image credit: Leica)

The rangefinder mechanism is the most expensive component on a Leica M camera, so replacing it with an electronic viewfinder will greatly reduce production costs.

Add in the fact that the leak says the camera will offer just 64GB of built-in memory (the existing Leica M11-P, by comparison, has 256GB storage), and it seems that we’re looking at an 'entry-level' Leica M. I put the term in quotation marks because I believe it’ll still be a premium camera, just like any camera with the red dot logo – but I still think it’ll be affordable by Leica M standards.

The leak says the Leica M11-V’s EVF will be 5.7MP in resolution and 0.5-inches in size, with a 0.76x magnification and diopter compensation.

It also mentions a new FN button for viewfinder control (probably to select different frame sizes via digital zoom), a “puristic” design (clean lines, due to the lack of a rangefinder window), the Maestro III image processor and a 60MP full-frame BSI sensor – the same core imaging setup as the one found on the standard Leica M11, then.

The leak also states that the M11-V will be manufactured in Germany, lest fans worry about Leica outsourcing production to the Far East to save money.

The decision to drop the rangefinder on the Leica M11-V won’t be universally popular, but if it puts the M series within the range of more consumers it may ultimately prove to be a wise one.

Of course, many will claim that it isn’t a real M series camera without that rangefinder, but I’m looking forward to finding out for myself how this camera feels to use.

You might also like
Categories: Technology

Nevada forced to close state government offices following wide-ranging 'network security incident' - here's what we know

TechRadar News - Tue, 08/26/2025 - 11:35
  • The State of Nevada says it suffered "network security incident"
  • While not officially described as a cyberattack, it certainly resembles a ransomware attack
  • There is no evidence of stolen files yet

Offices, websites, and phone lines of the state government of Nevada were all made unavailable and taken offline following an apparent cyberattack.

The official X account of the Governor Lombardo Press Office posted an announcement saying the State of Nevada “identified a network security incident”.

At the moment this article was written, the website was still offline, displaying a single message, saying “The requested URL was rejected. Please consult with your administrator.”

Was this a ransomware attack?

“As the State continues its recovery efforts, the network security incident continues to impact the availability of certain state technology systems on the state network,” the announcement adds. “Some state websites or phone lines may be slow or briefly unavailable during recovery.”

The way the announcement is worded does not suggest this was a cyberattack, however with multiple services offline, an ongoing investigation, and the state looking to restore the services one by one, it all bears the markings of a ransomware attack.

Ransomware attacks also usually include data theft, with criminals exfiltrating sensitive files to be used as leverage in case the victim can restore their services via backups.

In this case, however, Nevada says there is currently no evidence that any personally identifiable information (PII) was compromised.

At press time, no threat actors assumed responsibility for the attack, but ransomware against US state and local governments has historically been carried out by financially motivated criminal groups rather than state-sponsored actors.

Some of the better-known ransomware gangs that have targeted US government entities include LockBit, BlackCat/ALPHV, Cl0p, Royal, and Vice Society.

According to a Reuters report, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency also issued a statement, claiming it was "actively tracking this network security incident and together with our partners, we are collaborating with the State of Nevada to offer our assistance."

You might also like
Categories: Technology

Pages

Subscribe to The Vortex aggregator - Technology