Error message

  • Warning: date_timezone_set() expects parameter 1 to be DateTime, bool given in format_date() (line 2062 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Warning: date_format() expects parameter 1 to be DateTimeInterface, bool given in format_date() (line 2072 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Warning: date_timezone_set() expects parameter 1 to be DateTime, bool given in format_date() (line 2062 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Warning: date_format() expects parameter 1 to be DateTimeInterface, bool given in format_date() (line 2072 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Warning: date_timezone_set() expects parameter 1 to be DateTime, bool given in format_date() (line 2062 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Warning: date_format() expects parameter 1 to be DateTimeInterface, bool given in format_date() (line 2072 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Warning: date_timezone_set() expects parameter 1 to be DateTime, bool given in format_date() (line 2062 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Warning: date_format() expects parameter 1 to be DateTimeInterface, bool given in format_date() (line 2072 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Warning: date_timezone_set() expects parameter 1 to be DateTime, bool given in format_date() (line 2062 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Warning: date_format() expects parameter 1 to be DateTimeInterface, bool given in format_date() (line 2072 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Warning: date_timezone_set() expects parameter 1 to be DateTime, bool given in format_date() (line 2062 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Warning: date_format() expects parameter 1 to be DateTimeInterface, bool given in format_date() (line 2072 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Warning: date_timezone_set() expects parameter 1 to be DateTime, bool given in format_date() (line 2062 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Warning: date_format() expects parameter 1 to be DateTimeInterface, bool given in format_date() (line 2072 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Deprecated function: implode(): Passing glue string after array is deprecated. Swap the parameters in drupal_get_feeds() (line 394 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/common.inc).
  • Deprecated function: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in menu_set_active_trail() (line 2405 of /home/cay45lq1/public_html/includes/menu.inc).

Technology

New forum topics

I'm a serial iPhone buyer, but the Google Pixel 10 Pro in Moonstone will test my loyalty to Apple

TechRadar News - Mon, 08/11/2025 - 08:56

In November last year, I wrote that the Google Pixel 9 Pro was the best-looking phone of 2024 and the only Android device that could tempt me away from my beloved iPhone. Ultimately, I still sided with the iPhone 16 Pro (the call of convenience was too hard to resist), but Google seems determined to win me over in 2025 with the Pixel 10 Pro.

Google’s next flagship is set to debut at this year’s Made by Google showcase on August 20, but it’s already been semi-unveiled in an official teaser video. The footage in question shows the back and one side of what’s purported to be the Pixel 10 Pro in a brand new ‘Moonstone’ color, and it’s heightened my excitement for the phone’s full-blown reveal.

Now, I’m not usually one to lose my head over colors, but this silverish-blue shade seemingly complements Google’s new (or rather, unchanged) flagship Pixel design perfectly. In fact, I’d go as far as to say that the Google Pixel 10 Pro in Moonstone is already the best-looking phone of 2025 – and yes, I’ve seen the rumored iPhone 17 Pro design.

To be clear: the Pixel 10 Pro looks almost identical to the Pixel 9 Pro. Leaked renders suggest that the phone’s metal frame will more closely resemble its rear panel glass (rather than being polished, as on the Pixel 9 Pro). But beyond that, it’s safe to expect a like-for-like handset; I don’t think this is a bad thing.

An official image of a phone believed to be the Pixel 10 Pro in Moonstone (Image credit: Google)

Google hit a home run with the design of the Pixel 9 Pro, which, in my opinion, is the Android phone that’s come closest to replicating the iPhone’s unique synergy of simplicity and style. It remixed the Pixel formula with flat aluminum sides, a frosted glass rear panel, and a perfectly sized pill-shaped module, all of which made the Pixel line feel more grown-up.

Google is right to stick by this cleaner, more industrial aesthetic with the Pixel 10 Pro, and the addition of a new ‘Moonstone’ color (as opposed to something more outlandish) suggests Google wants its next flagship phone to be perceived as just that: a grown-up flagship.

Of course, design is subjective. I’m sure many people continue to prefer the uniquely Pixel aesthetic of the Pixel 8 Pro, Pixel 7 Pro, and so on. I can understand why.

But I genuinely believe that Google is one of the few – perhaps the only – smartphone manufacturers to have successfully designed a better-looking phone with each new generation. And if the below X post is anything to go by, Google thinks so too:

10 generations in the making. Look for #Pixel10 in 10 days at #MadeByGoogle: https://t.co/VxzWRaYodH pic.twitter.com/ER8qtFcDv5August 10, 2025

Will I finally switch sides and buy the Pixel 10 Pro is year? Probably not. But that’s only because a decade of investing in Apple hardware has made ditching the iPhone more trouble than it's worth. The Pixel 9 Pro was the best-looking phone of last year, and, for me, the Pixel 10 Pro has already repeated the feat in 2025.

For more on Google's next flagship, check out our roundup of the five upgrades to expect from the Google Pixel 10 Pro.

You might also like
Categories: Technology

Intel CEO set to meet President Trump following tirade of attacks and 'immediate resignation' demands

TechRadar News - Mon, 08/11/2025 - 08:32
  • President Trump set to meet with Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan
  • The President recently called for the CEO's immediate resignation
  • Trump accused Tan of major "conflicts of interest" because of his investments in Chinese companies

Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan is set to meet with President Trump to discuss the former's professional and personal history, and explore ways in which the US government and Intel can work together, sources have told the Wall Street Journal.

Tan has recently faced a series of attacks from President Trump, who has demanded his resignation over alleged investments and dealing with Chinese businesses.

Trump has accused Tan of being “highly conflicted” and demanded his “immediate resignation,” stating that there is “no other solution to this problem.”

Rocky history

Intel has been steadily trimming its global workforce in recent months, leading to a 20% reduction in headcount that has seen thousands of employees lose their jobs in US factories

Tan has also recently butted heads with Intel board members over the direction of Intel’s investments in the US.

For example, the new CEO has reduced the pace of construction of a new factory in Ohio in order to meet perceived customer demands, causing issues with Republican Ohio senator Bernie Moreno.

Both the job cuts and slowed construction directly contradict President Trump’s desire to increase domestic investment from companies that have typically manufactured goods outside of the US.

What’s more, Tan’s previous position as CEO of Cadence Design Systems appears to have ruffled a few feathers in the Trump administration due to the company recently handing over $140 million in penalties after pleading guilty to unlawfully exporting chip design tools to restricted Chinese military organizations.

Tan himself also holds numerous investments in Chinese businesses, including buying $200 million worth of stakes in Chinese manufacturing and chip companies between 2012 and 2024 according to a Reuters report.

However, Tan has not only been on the board of numerous enterprises involved in chip manufacturing, but founded a venture capital firm named Walden International that focused heavily on tech startups in the Asian market.

Tan’s holdings in Chinese companies could therefore simply be a smart investment based on decades of experience, rather than the shady under-the-table dealings Trump has alleged in his Red Scare tirades on Truth Social.

Trump appears to be deaf to his own accusations of Tan’s “conflicts of interest,” with the President frequently using his position to market his own goods from the Trump Store, as well as launching the $TRUMP cryptocurrency of which the President controls 80% of the coin's supply.

(Image credit: Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

In a recent letter to employees, Tan said the US had been his home for more than 40 years, and the company was communicating with the White House to make sure the President has “the facts.”

Trump has recently levied significant tariffs on countries that he perceives to have an unfair trade balance, causing the price of some goods to increase as the cost of imports are passed on to the consumer - a fact that many within the Trump administration and his MAGA base are struggling to come to terms with.

Trump’s pursuit of an America First policy has drawn significant investment from many major companies, including Nvidia, Intel, and Apple, to build factories in the US to produce goods domestically. However there is a reason that these companies have historically manufactured their goods outside of the US. It’s cheaper.

Recent studies into the costs of a US manufactured iPhone for example have theorized that the price tag could rise by between 25-100%.

In an added contradiction, Trump’s own branded handsets from Trump Mobile likely won’t be manufactured in the US, with Eric Trump claiming that “Eventually, all the phones can be built in the United States of America.”

You might also like
Categories: Technology

Pages

Subscribe to The Vortex aggregator - Technology