Meta has announced Petal, a subsea cable system built to carry a petabit of data every second across the Atlantic Ocean.
The company says this new system will stretch roughly 7,000 kilometers, or about 4,300 miles, linking the United States and France.
Meta expects Petal to enter service in 2029, working alongside NEC Corporation and Sumitomo Electric Industries on its construction and eventual deployment.
How Petal reaches such enormous speedUndersea cables already carry about 99% of the world's intercontinental internet traffic, according to Meta, making new capacity increases commercially significant.
Traditional transatlantic cables move data in terabits each second, but Petal aims for petabit scale, roughly a million gigabits every second.
"Achieving petabit-per-second capacity across a transoceanic submarine system represents a major technological milestone in the history of global telecommunications," said Eduardo Mateo, Chief Strategy Officer, Submarine Network Division at NEC Corporation.
According to Meta's estimate, that much capacity could let 75% of Earth's population stream music simultaneously.
Reaching that scale required multi-core fiber technology, doubling the 24 fiber pairs used on Meta's earlier Anjana cable system into 48 spatial channels.
Petal also uses a lower power repeater design that allows the entire system to run from a single feeding point for added resilience.
That capacity would make Petal roughly 3.3 million times faster than a typical American home internet connection, based on average broadband speeds.
At that speed, Petal could theoretically move every song ever commercially released to another continent in under one second.
Meta says Petal will double existing transoceanic capacity without adding more power equipment or new physical structures, a claim still untested outside controlled trials.
Undersea cables remain critical infrastructure despite the costCommunication traffic keeps rising as AI tools and everyday digital services demand more resilient, reliable connections between continents.
This is why Meta keeps expanding its subsea capacity across multiple regions and long-distance routes worldwide.
The company has backed more than 20 subsea cable projects already, including its wider Project Waterworth initiative, giving it a long record in undersea infrastructure.
"Meta continues to invest in digital infrastructure, such as subsea cables, because they are foundational to delivering the high quality services our end users expect," said Alex-Handrah Aime, Vice President, Network Investments at Meta.
Sumitomo Electric echoed that reasoning, framing its new two-core fiber as essential to supporting long-term global network expansion.
"We are committed to supporting the global network expansion essential to realizing a highly digital future," said Takehiko Okada, General Manager, Optical Fiber and Cable Division at Sumitomo Electric Industries.
Whether Petal meets its 2029 deadline will depend on regulatory approval, ocean permitting, and manufacturing timelines that often slip for projects this size.
Attackers are exploiting CVE-2026-48842 against unpatched Roundcube servers months after a fix was released, raising urgency for organizations to update.
The post Attackers Target Unpatched Roundcube Servers With CVE-2026-48842 appeared first on TechRepublic.
The Netgear Orbi 770 mesh router system is one of the best we've ever tested, scoring 4.5 stars in our review. Now, it's just hit its lowest ever price at Amazon.
• Best for: Home users and small businesses that need strong Wi-Fi coverage in every room without dead zones.
• The deal: The Netgear Orbi 770 Wi-Fi 7 mesh system three pack is now £579 (was £759) at Amazon.
• Why it matters: Under testing, we found this mesh system delivered "impressive Wi-Fi 7 speeds at a competitive price." It's tri-band model that takes full advantage of Wi-Fi 7 speeds, reaching up to 11Gbp. Coverage is up to 6,750 sq ft from the router and two satellites, which is ideal of large premises. There's support for MLO, up to 100 connected devices, and a 2.5 Gig internet port for full-speed fibre connections.
Orbi 770 Wi-Fi 7 mesh router (3-pack): was £759 now £579
This is the 3-pack configuration: one Orbi 770 router plus two satellite units, built to blanket a larger home in strong signal without the dead zones a single router leaves behind.View Deal
When we put the Orbi 770 to the test, we found it offered "excellent performance for home users and small businesses," scoring it 4.5 stars.
It might be cheaper than the flagship Orbi 970 series, but it "doesn’t cut any corners when it comes to performance." It did aa great job of extending wireless connectivity to hard-to-reach areas of the house during review.
Bonus points for the easy-to-use app, which lets you set up guest Wi-Fi accounts and IoT networks. It's simple to get started, although some features are locked behind an optional subscription.
Overall, we rated it the top pick for homes in our guide to the best mesh Wi-Fi systems.
Price Context & Historical ValueAt £579, this is an all-time low for the Orbi 770 series. It proved to be a strong all-round performer at an affordable price (well, compared to the Orbi 970). At this deal price, it's about on par with the Amazon eero 7 Pro.
Should you buy it?✅ Buy the Netgear Orbi 770 if...
You want whole-home Wi-Fi 7 coverage to eliminate internet dead zones, especially if you have a lot of devices or run a multi-gig fibre connection.
❌ Skip the Netgear Orbi 770 if...
You live in a flat or smaller house where a single router or two-pack model will suit you better, or you don't have devices for Wi-Fi 7 speeds with no plans to future-proof or upgrade.
What happened to Jensen Huang? The Nvidia co-founder and CEO seems about as disconnected as a person can be from other humans' life experiences. That wouldn't be so concerning if it weren't for the fact that he runs the most valuable company in the world and is responsible for the hardware behind the most life-altering innovation in our lifetime: AI.
Huang, who founded Nvidia 33 years ago, has been a CEO for decades and a billionaire since 1999; he's also now firmly on the side of rapid AI development and deployment with little-to-no regulation, putting Huang firmly at odds with a growing legion of, admittedly, some other billionaires and CEOs — among others — who are calling for a foundational model development pause or at least slow down.
It's in this moment that Huang has been talking — a lot. He's sat down with multiple journalists for chats, but none now more notable than the extensive New York Times podcast with columnist Ezra Klein.
Unlike some of the other interviews, Klein used Huang's own description of the AI as a Five-Layer Cake: Applications, Models, Infrastructure, Chips. Energy to frame the conversation, which invited Huang to opine on all these critical AI bits, and I have to say, many of his comments were eye-opening.
Here are the most startling things Huang said and maybe why he's saying them:
'There are a lot of skills that don’t matter'"There are a lot of skills that don’t matter."
The topic here was studies in China showing that while AI in education may initially help students work more efficiently, it, on average, lowers their test scores by almost 20%.
Huang agrees with Ezra that the use of AI is, while helping them work faster, possibly degrading student performance, at least in certain skills.
"The multiplication table is starting to be forgotten. Doing square roots, my goodness. Basic math is being forgotten. Does it matter?...Yeah. I don’t think it does. I don’t think it does."
Huang believes that even as we lose some skills, or as students become adults entering the workforce, they will gain other new skills. Of course, that's sort of a zero-sum game where you can easily replace one thing with another.
I don't know about you, but I do consider the multiplication tables to be a core skill and useful even if you don't work in a math-related field. Naturally, Huang and most AI providers would like to believe that, like the calculator before it, AI will handle this skill and do all the math for you. Perhaps. But at what point do we lose the ability as a culture to double-check AI's work?
'I actually don’t know my address'This next one is actually connected to the prior quote but is worth calling out:
"My first confession, I actually don’t know my address."
Not his email address, not his phone number or his partner's phone number, but where he lives. The street number and zip code (I'll assume he knows the town and state).
Huang used this as an example of a skill he no longer needs, but admits that realizing it while pumping gas and needing his zip code (I'm guessing for credit card verification) panicked him.
Listening to this while driving my own car, I almost pulled over. "What?!" I yelled at my AI-filled iPhone 18 Pro Max, which was playing the podcast. First of all, how? Second, Huang could not have crafted a better comment to undermine this and many of his other comments.
The only way you don't know your home address is if you've been shielded from the act of entering it on documents and driving yourself home because you always have someone else doing it for you. Huang's lived experience is thoroughly disconnected from the average person, and yet the choices he's making impact most regular people.
'[China] manufacture[s] everything in volume. They manufacture smart kids in volume'Throughout the long conversation, Huang comes off as an industry Pollyanna and wildly self-serving.
He's asked repeatedly about China's approach to AI and if and how the US should be competing with them and ensuring that the US doesn't fall behind in this critical race. To put his comments in context, you have to remember that Huang personally asked the White House to allow it to continue selling AI chips to China. Huang did note, by the way, that he at least sells new technology to US companies first.
Overall, Huang essentially never criticizes China and, in fact, seems almost in awe of its approach on most fronts, especially in its use of open-model community (calling it "super-vibrant), and how it's raising an army of people to build its AI future.
"They have so many scientists and mathematicians. The number of engineers they have, they manufacture that in volume. They manufacture everything in volume. They manufacture smart kids in volume."
I don't know if that last bit was a backhanded criticism of the US education system, but it's not like he added, "Of course, we are creating just as many smart kids in the US."
'all of the rhetoric and all the alarmism, all the doomerism, all of the predictions — they’re scaring people'If Huang has any criticism, it's reserved for his US counterparts, whom he calls "alarmists" and "doomers".
"I want to see us not ruin the opportunity for the United States to benefit at the highest level. And notice all of the rhetoric and all the alarmism, all the doomerism, all of the predictions — they're scaring people."
Huang insists that these AI models are still just programs running on operating systems, and wishes people would stop infusing them with human attributes.
'Just because it comes from a scientist doesn’t make it scientific'While Klein mentions most of Huang's partners and occasional alarm-sounders, like Altman, Modei, and Musk, Huang doesn't actually mention any of them by name. The 'Godfather of AI' and chief alarmist Geoffrey Hinton, though, does receive special mention.
In response to a question about Hinton's assertion that there's a 10% chance AI will end society as we know it, Huang calls the statement "irresponsible" and adds, "Just because it comes from a scientist doesn’t make it scientific."
In a way, Huang is right. After all, Hinton is still just a person who can bring personal opinions to the debate. Huang argues that the "10% chance is not grounded on science."
But isn't it? If Hinton is the Nobel Prize-winning person who introduced the world to deep learning, which helped trigger the generative AI revolution, isn't everything he says, in some way, based on science?
Instead of saying he understands the concern but here's why he's wrong, Huang just claims the foundation of Hinton's argument is faulty, and therefore his statements are not really worth addressing. Huang would simply like everyone, all the doomers, to stop scaring everyone.
'The A.I. supercomputers are super energy efficient, but they’re still going to use a lot of power'Huang says he wants AI to benefit every company and person, and he tries to offer a reasoned approach to the growing outcry over data centers.
He agrees that if people don't want them in their town, "then so be it," and encourages companies to be transparent about the impact, though he argues that their "use of water is really efficient." In the same breath, Huang tries to have it both ways: "The A.I. supercomputers are super energy efficient, but they’re still going to use a lot of power."
If, in Huang's perfect world, AI companies do generate their own power (building power sources takes time, probably more than it takes to build data centers) and they somehow lower property taxes, maybe data centers could someday be a net positive. Most, I think, would argue we're not there yet, even as the number of data centers being built across the US explodes.
'I think we just have to acknowledge that we got ourselves really gummed up in climate change and sustainable energy'More concerning is Huang's shocking perspective on climate change and fossil fuels.
"I think we just have to acknowledge that we got ourselves really gummed up in climate change and sustainable energy, and as a result, we just didn’t plan enough energy production."
Klein, naturally, asked what Jensen meant by "gummed up," and, yes, it got worse.
"Well, in the near term, energy production requires fossil fuel. And because there’s just so much angst about fossil fuel energy production, if you look at our country, we’ve produced very little net new energy for a long time."
There's a lot to unpack there. It sounds like Huang is downplaying real climate change concerns, something that might align with the beliefs of his pal and "drill-baby-drill" and climate-change denier US President Donald Trump.
In fact, Huang never addresses whether climate change is real or not and instead seems fixated on how the loss of more fossil-fuel-burning energy plants puts us behind China in the energy race, and, more problematically for him, at a time when AI needs a lot more energy.
'They’ve got to inflict an enormous amount of pain and suffering on you so that they can save you'It's not all bad. Huang believes, "If you want a future that is sustainable, lean into AI”
And then he says this:
"Yeah. It’s kind of like, in order to save you, they’ve got to hurt you first — that’s the nature of surgery. They’ve got to cut you open to save you. They’ve got to inflict an enormous amount of pain and suffering on you so that they can save you. And so I think A.I.’s kind of like that."
As for what level of "pain and suffering" Huang believes we should endure, he didn't elaborate.
If you were watching or listening to the interview hoping for some encouragement or a more rational, middle-of-the-road approach to regulating and governing AI in ways that truly benefit all, you might've been disappointed. Huang does say that when the builders see AI going awry, they should stop it, and when an AI acts out of alignment, "they shouldn’t release the product. That’s the simple answer." But he never addresses the concerns over what appears to be happening before Anthropic, OpenAI, and potentially others release their models. These systems are jumping fences in testing.
Huang may not understand the needs of the common person, but that pales in comparison to the dispassionate AI, which neither knows nor cares about us. We need leaders like Huang to start caring, but first they have to understand us and our very reasonable concerns.
Samsung is behind some of our favorite portable SSDs, with the T7 being an excellent example. This incredibly versatile 1TB drive combines USB 3.2 Gen 2 connectivity with a durable aluminum enclosure.
• Best for: Professionals, students, photographers, and creators who need fast, compact external storage that can easily switch between modern devices.
• The deal: The Samsung T7 1TB SSD is now $230 (was $275) at Amazon.
• Why it matters: Samsung has consistently delivered an excellent range of portable SSDs. The T7 is a real classic of the range - compact, durable, and speedy enough for most users. It delivers read speeds up to 1,050MB/s and writes speeds up to 1,000MB/s, making large file transfers considerably quicker than with portable hard drives.
Today's best Samsung portable SSD deal1TB T7 Portable SSD: was $274.99 now $229.99
This portable SSD provides 1TB storage, up to 1,050MB/s reads and 1,000MB/s writes, USB 3.2 Gen 2 connectivity, AES-256 hardware encryption, aluminum construction and six-foot drop resistance.View Deal
The T7 uses NVMe storage and USB 3.2 Gen 2 to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 1,050MB/s and writes of up to 1,000MB/s. Samsung supports recording compatible high-resolution video directly to the T7, including ProRes 4K at 60fps from supported iPhones. The aluminum drive measures just 3.3 x 2.2 x 0.3 inches, weighs around 2.1oz and is designed to withstand drops of up to six feet.
Price context & historical valueThe reduction from $274.99 to $229.99 will save you 16%. That's a welcome price cut in 2026, but it's still expensive for a 1TB external SSD by historical standards. In 2023, before component prices began sky-rocketing, it was available to buy for just $64.99. I don't expect to see it that low again for a very long time, if ever.
For more shopping options, take a look at our roundup of the best portable SSDs, and the fastest external SSDs.
Should you buy it?✅ Buy the Samsung T7 Portable SSD if...
You frequently move large files between devices and need something faster than a hard drive. The T7 supports 256-bit AES hardware encryption, which is useful if you'll be carrying important work or personal files about with you.
❌ Skip the Samsung T7 Portable SSD if...
Your priority is getting as much storage as possible for the money. You're paying a premium for the T7's combination of SSD performance, compact dimensions and portability, and a slower external drive will give you much more space for the same money, or probably even less.
Also consider1TB Portable SSD: $159.99
This cheaper Sandisk alternative provides 1TB of portable storage, read speeds up to 1,000MB/s, two-meter drop protection and a pocket-sized design compatible with laptops and tablets.View Deal
1TB Pocket External SSD: $139.99
This even cheaper Verbatim alternative provides 1TB of portable storage, read speeds up to 1,000MB/s, USB 3.2 Gen 2 connectivity, a keyring and a cable holder.View Deal
A data center slated to provide "AI infrastructure" to Microsoft later this year has been hit with a $1.07 million fine by the US state of New Jersey after allegedly installing no fewer than 62 natural gas generators on-site without obtaining the correct environmental permits.
The state found out about the generators after a local farmer photographing a neighboring golf course noticed equipment appearing on the campus. This led to an investigation by the nonprofit newsroom Floodlight, in partnership with the Guardian, and the deployment of a thermal drone — which reportedly observed 45 of the 62 generators in operation.
The fine was based on New Jersey's Air Pollution Control Act, which requires both preconstruction permits to install the generators and operating certificates to run them. Neither had been obtained across all 62 units, the department said in an announcement.
DataOne campus due to supply Microsoft in coming monthsThe DataOne facility has been built for the Dutch cloud AI company Nebius, which announced earlier this month that it would be using it to "deliver AI infrastructure to Microsoft," starting later this year.
DEP Commissioner Ed Potosnak described the fine as "by far the largest ever taken against a data center in New Jersey and possibly one of the largest such actions in the nation."
He continued: "The Sherrill administration demands accountability and corporate responsibility in the construction and operation of data centers and is committed to putting in place legal and regulatory guardrails that protect ratepayers, communities and the environment.”
With each generator rated at 1,982 kilowatts, they collectively have a 123-megawatt capacity. For reference, the state asserted that any individual generators with a 37kW or higher capacity requires approval.
The generators effectively provide the data center with a considerable amount of off-grid electricity supply, but while this may be good news to alleviate strains on local infrastructure and household energy prices, there are concerns over CO2, NO2 and CO emissions.
"While we disagree with the temporary generator determination, we will apply for the air permits for the temporary generators and are in communication with the Department of Environmental Protection regarding its findings and the fuel cell transition timeline," DataOne, said in a statement.
DataOne has been given 45 days to obtain the relevant permits, but in the interim, it can continue using the gas generators.
We're only a few days from Lanterns' second-to-last episode. Indeed, with the hit sci-fi crime drama's next chapter due out shortly, we don't have much longer to see John Stewart team up with the Hal-O-Gram — aka the digital back-up of Hal Jordan's consciousness — to continue investigating the real Hal's apparent murder.
So, will John get on better with this version of Hal than the real thing? What lies in store for them in the DC Universe (DCU) show's seventh entry? And, most importantly, when will it premiere?
I'm not at liberty to answer the first two, but I can tell you more about episode 7's release date and launch time. So, read on to learn more.
When does episode 7 of Lanterns come out?HBO's Green Lantern TV show will return for its next installment, titled 'The Jordan Boys Legacy', in the US and Canada on Sunday, September 27 at 6pm PT / 9pm ET.
Just like every episode before it, this week's chapter will come out a day later outside of North and South America. Viewers in other territories, then, will need to wait until Monday, September 28, to see the DCU Chapter One TV series' penultimate entry. Check out the list below to see what time it'll drop where you live:
All episodes of Lanterns — including this week's entry — air on HBO Max, aka one of the world's best streaming services, in nations that the platform is available.
For some reason, HBO Max hasn't launched in every world region, so some of you will need to go elsewhere to stream the DC comic book TV series. Alternatively, you could just make things easier for yourself and read the below list:
Unfortunately, only two more episodes of the Aaron Pierre and Kyle Chandler-led show remain.
Read my Lanterns coverage- Lanterns episode 1 ending explained
- Sinestro in Lanterns explained
- Lanterns' Manhunters explained
- Lanterns' Guardians of the Universe explained
- Lanterns episode 4 ending explained
- Lanterns episode 5 ending explained
- Lanterns episode 6 introduces a major character from Hal Jordan's past
As long as HBO doesn't suddenly change the launch date for the final two chapters, they'll continue to air on Sundays in the Americas and Mondays on other continents. There's no reason to suspect that an unexpected release schedule alteration will happen for the forthcoming finale, either, so I'm confident it'll be released at the same time that its forebears were.
Anyway, here's a quick breakdown of when the remaining entries will come out:
For more on the hit series ahead of its next episode, check out what Lanterns' midseason trailer tells us about its final two chapters. Then, read up on why I'm fearing the worst for Lanterns season 2.
AGIBOT and Chimelong are deploying more than 300 robots across a Chinese theme park and hotel, testing embodied AI in real commercial operations.
The post AGIBOT Deploys 300-Plus Robots Across Chinese Theme Park appeared first on TechRepublic.
Beats 360 undercuts Sony’s WH-1000XM6 by $110, but the trade-offs span sound, ANC, wired audio, workout use, and platform features.
The post Beats 360 vs. Sony WH-1000XM6: Which Makes More Sense at These Prices? appeared first on TechRepublic.
PC gaming accessory maker Logitech G has just released the Pro X3 Superstrike, an upgraded version of the Pro X2 Superstrike that came out earlier this year.
We called the original model a 'revolutionary' innovation in our 5-star review, praising its unique Haptic Inductive Trigger System (HITS) switches. Relying on electromagnetic current, HITS allows you to customize everything from the exact actuation point of each click to just how much resistance there is when you press down.
This is a boon in an esports setting, where a short click speed can cut down click latency and, potentially, provide an edge over your opponents.
(Image credit: Logitech G)The upgrades found with the Pro X3 Superstrike are subtle, as you might expect given the short time between the two releases, but serve to make an already best-in-class product that little bit better.
It weighs the same 61g as the X2 model, but has been reworked internally for more even weight distribution. This, the team behind the mouse tells me, is the direct result of feedback given by esports pros who complained the original was too front-heavy.
Under the hood, it's also powered by a new chipset, dubbed the NxLOGI. Power efficiency was a major focus, with Logitech claiming that the X3 Superstrike can last more than 135 hours on each charge for a massive 45-hour boost compared to the X2.
There's an upgraded sensor too, which supports up to 48,000 DPI (compared to the 44,000 DPI of the previous model). Other flagship specs, like an up to 8,000Hz wireless report rate, remain unchanged — though there's now the option to achieve that when using the mouse in a wired capacity too.
Interestingly, there are some new features on the software side: you can now choose a range of Pro Presets in the compatible Logitech G Hub app, all inspired by the settings used by esports players like m0NESY or ShowMaker.
(Image credit: Logitech)The result is a mouse that's clearly the better pick if you're weighing up the two, but all of this does with a price hike in the US and UK. The X3 Superstrike retails for $199.99 / £169.99 / AU$299.95. That's $20 / £10 more than the X2 (though, weirdly, the Australian price remains the same).
A Logitech representative did tell me that the X2 Superstrike will remain on sale alongside the X3 Superstrike for a time as an alternative for those who want something a little cheaper.
Google is testing a Gemini feature on Pixel 11 phones that can call businesses, navigate menus, wait on hold and speak with employees for users.
The post Google Tests Gemini Calling Feature That Talks to Businesses for You appeared first on TechRepublic.
See what you missed in Daily Tech Insider from Sept. 21–25.
The post AI’s Compute Race Reaches Orbit as Security Risks Multiply in This Week in Tech appeared first on TechRepublic.
I probably shouldn't have told Dominic West that he plays punchable characters incredibly well when I interviewed him a few weeks ago, but it's painfully true. From The Affair to his Nationwide adverts (sorry, but that guy needs a slap), West has the sub-genre ingeniously sewn up.
As of October 2, we can add War to the list. Streaming on Sky TV (UK) and HBO Max (internationally), we follow the high-profile divorce of British celebrities Morgan (West) and Carla (Sienna Miller) after Carla sets up a honeytrap to expose Morgan's infidelity throughout their marriage.
They're not the only two who have beef, though. Morgan's law firm, Cathcarts, is a stalwart of the legal world, with Carla's firm, Taylor & Byrne, co-founded by an old Cathcarts employee who was refused partnership. Think old money meets nouveau riche, if this was a reality TV show.
What we're left with is the kind of delicious legal drama that only the unique complexities of British culture could pull off this well. The legal system, our consumption of popular celebrity culture and our continued fascination with people's private lives are eviscerated at every turn, and I frankly love being reminded that collectively, we're getting so much wrong.
But nobody is real here, so we can happily get stuck into berating them — and by God, do they give us a lot of ammunition. From Carla and Morgan's sneaky manoeuvres behind closed doors to new legal assistant Johnny (Archie Renaux), who thinks he's outwitting everyone around him when he's really ten steps behind, there's something for every armchair gossip.
War is the ultimate game of celebrity tennis — with no winnersNot only is the above trailer possibly one of the strongest of the year, but it aptly sets the scene for our modern Shakespeare tragedy without giving too much away. Unsurprisingly, Miller and West are our focal points, and as punchable as West makes Morgan, I'm actually floored by how much the pair is able to give these roles.
When you take a step back, the level of public scrutiny both Carla and Morgan receive is incredibly true to life. Both are mercilessly hounded by the press through relentless front-page tabloid articles, uncomfortable questions at events, and even lawyer-up red carpet premieres. It's a situation that I can vividly remember both actors being in before, and I applaud their remarkable level of personal and professional separation.
If it were me, I'd have had a major chip on my shoulder having to fictionally revisit the things that made me the most miserable over the last few decades of my life. But that's the beauty of good actors — being willing to put themselves on the line to allow viewers to engage as critically as possible. Trust me... I think you'll learn a lot from its premise.
The structure, overall, has one fatal flaw. From War's opening seconds, we're booted into the trenches of doomed marriage with such severity that we could collectively get a headache. But fast-forward seven episodes and the stakes are exactly the same. Think of the eight-episode season as a flatlining heart monitor... It's not a good result for a patient on The Pitt, and not entirely successful for us, either.
Celia Imrie and Nina Sosanya, take a bow (Image credit: HBO Max/Sky TV)But when things are good, they're golden (with the exception of the very underwhelming theme song). Biting, cutting, and scheming at every turn, War is a British legal drama at its best. None of this is possible without a cracking ensemble cast, of course, and there are two standouts in particular.
The first, which shouldn't be surprising, is Celia Imrie. From the trailer, you'd have guessed that she plays the High Court Judge overseeing the trial, but she's actually "freelance lawyer" Budgie working under Taylor & Byrne. I'm wording that generously, seeing as the minute she enters the room, all decisions pay deference to her presence. That's exactly how it should be, and if anyone was going to represent me in court, I'd want it to be Imrie.
After her epically infamous fart on The Celebrity Traitors season 1, I'm glad that Imrie's back on the international stage, proving that she's always been a world-class esteemed performer, don't you know. Seth Rogen's reference to her at the 2026 TV BAFTAs annoyed me endlessly... Calendar Girls was my favorite film at eight years old for good reason, man.
Then there's Nina Sosanya, a woman I have been parasocially in love with for decades. I can guarantee that you'll recognise her immediately thanks to her quiet commitment to making TV shows and movies infinitely better just by turning up in them. As head Cathcart's lawyer Bea, she's the Miranda Priestly of the British legal world, and her razor-sharp tongue provides lashings of delectable dialogue. Let's get her on Celebrity Traitors season 3, BBC.
With shortcomings so small, you'd be a fool to miss out on War next month. Even better: it's an anthology series, so expect a gripping defamation case to hit our screens in the future.
Fall — or spring, if you live in the southern hemisphere — has arrived. And, while that means the nights are about to get longer or shorter for you, some things will stay the same — including the release of new movies and TV shows on the world's best streaming services.
After last week's top-heavy TV series round-up, its follow-up has done a complete 180 and delivered a bonanza of new films to enjoy, including two of the biggest hits of 2026 on Disney+ and HBO Max. So, what are you waiting for? Scroll on to find out more. — Tom Power, senior entertainment reporter
Toy Story 5 (Disney+)I'm going to be frank: Toy Story 5 doesn't have a friend in mine. Indeed, as I said in my Toy Story 5 review, it's not terrible, but it's certainly a "a few Lightyears away from the Disney film series' best entries".
Still, if you're a sucker for a new Toy Story project, or any Pixar film for the matter, you can check out the multi-billion dollar-spinning movie franchise's latest outing on Disney's primary streamer. This time around, Woody, Buzz, Jessie, and company have to contend with the prospect of being replaced by high-tech toys and devices, so it's a timely albeit predictable fifth outing for the fan-favorite toys. — TP
Backrooms (HBO Max)Did you know Backrooms filmmaker Kane Parsons was only 20 years old when he made his feature film directorial debut? It's all that most outlets could talk about before his much-anticipated adaptation of the viral internet phenomenon hit theaters.
Well, nobody's talking about his age now, because Backrooms, which has arrived on HBO Max, was a major hit for A24 earlier this year. I enjoyed it up to its final act (I don't think it stuck the landing), but my colleague Lucy Buglass ended her Backrooms review by giving it five out of five stars, so it comes highly recommended from one of us!
I could tell you about its plot, but the less you know about this one, the better, believe me. — TP
Unabomber (Netflix)What happened to that tiny little boy from Room? Well, he grew up to play domestic terrorist Ted Kaczynski for a Netflix movie, that's what.
Jacob Tremblay stars as the self-titled Unabomber, who was behind a series of mail bombs that killed its recipients in 1994. However, instead of following the man as each fatal moment unfolds, Unabomber takes us back to his Harvard days in 1958 and examines what led him to becoming the infamous domestic terrorist.
It's really answering the question that we're endlessly dying to know: what makes someone kill another? In this case, it's a mix of bullying and becoming the subject of severe psychological experiments. Oof. — Jasmine Valentine, entertainment reporter
Brothers (Apple TV)What would you do if you took a long-standing rumor and decided to run with it? If you're Apple, you fully lean into the fact that Matthew McConaughey and Woody Harrelson are related, and create a TV show titled Brothers.
The famously close friends, who some observers believe are half-brothers, play fictionalized versions of themselves in this new Apple TV comedy series that — yep, you guessed it — plays along with the fact that they may be blood relatives.
Obviously, the whole thing is played for laughs, but I suspect Brothers will do little to dispel the gossip that the A-listers might be closer than everyone, including themselves, initially thought. Will we ever find out for sure? If an incredibly reluctant McConaughey ever takes a DNA test, sure, but don't gets your hopes up... — TP
The Love Hypothesis (Prime Video)Prime Video isn't loosening its grip on young adult romantic drama just yet. The Love Hypothesis , which is based on Ali Hazelwood's book namesake, is the latest in line of its banging 2026 genre content.
In a nutshell, Olive (Lili Reinhart) is a third-year biology PhD candidate at Stanford researching early pancreatic cancer detection. In order to convince her best friend Anh (Rachel Marsh) that she has completely moved on from a crush, Olive impulsively grabs and kisses Adam (Tom Bateman) in the lab hallway.
The two make a mutually beneficial agreement to fake date each other... though that fakeness doesn't last for long. Personally, I think the strongest love story here is between the two besties, but the new movie ticks all of the rom-com boxes that it needs to. — JV
Jackass: Best and Last (Paramount+)How many times can you put explosives in your butt, dangle on a wire over a pool of alligators, or get slapped to the ground by a giant mechanical hand? 11, if you count all the movies, which sign off with Jackass: Best and Last.
Expect more of the same idiotic vibes with a touch more sentimentality. Johnny Knoxville, Steve-O, and the rest of the gang return for more outrageous and hilarious stunts, and my jaw is still on the floor after all of these years.
What you really won't expect is how strangely moving the whole thing is. Do I really believe this is the end? No. Surely these guys will be the Cher of final farewell tours, but what do I know? Well, apart from the fact it's out on Paramount+... — JV
A Different World (Netflix)This 10-episode series feels worth watching purely because one of its main characters is called Dwayne Wayne. Hilarious names aside, A Different World is Netflix's revival of the hits 1990s sitcom of the same name, and follows a freshman and her ride-or-die crew juggling school, romantic drama, and family legacy at a historically Black college.
Can the 2026 version live up to the huge shoes it has to fill? Time will tell. But, with multiple original cast members returning to the new show, I'm more than willing to give it a shot. — JV
Ace Combat 8, the latest installment in Project Aces' long-running arcade flight sim series, is here. Packed inside this game's cargo hold is a medley of melodrama, mission types, and a beautiful new look, but it's somewhat over capacity when it comes to cutscenes.
Review infoPlatform reviewed: PC
Available on: PS5, Xbox Series X|S, PC
Release date: October 2, 2026
You'll discover this right from the off: Ace Combat 8 is the first game in the series where its cutscenes are entirely from a first-person perspective.
You step into the shoes of Rex, a pilot in service with the navy of the Federation of Central Usea (FCU). Sotoa, a nation of former nomads, has decided to emulate the Mongols of our reality and has conquest in mind, with the FCU already almost completely subjugated at the start of the game. Said shoes are likely very damp, with events kicking off on a life raft after the helicopter you were in went down.
Soon, you're back in the sky as a navigator for Jan "Rex" Cope, the original Rex, who is the mythical Wings of Theve of the game's subtitle. This strongly evokes the Ghost of Kyiv, a mythical pilot heavily propagandized early in the ongoing Russo-Ukrainian War, but Cope soon comes a cropper and gets killed, forcing you to take over his role.
A huge part of the game's narrative is about propaganda and the role that social media plays in modern warfare. Wings, as a pilot, can't be allowed to die, so you need to fill in and lead his Joker Flight unit. The former Rex, however, doesn't disappear; his spirit serves as a near-omniscient narrator for the rest of the game's escapades.
Flying without wings(Image credit: Bandai Namco Entertainment)What escapades they are, too. Over the course of the game, which is significantly longer than Ace Combat 7 (with my playthrough clocking in at around 18 hours to complete all 30 missions), you'll do almost everything you could reasonably expect a pilot to do. Dogfights, close air support, attacks on enemy ships, and more.
Best bit(Image credit: Bandai Namco Entertainment)Engaging the afterburners, breaking through the clouds, and shaking off an enemy missile never loses its charm.
Joker Flight will accompany you through most of it, and happily, every member has a well-fleshed-out personality. There's Ellington "Professor" Baxter, an easy-going and ever-professional former university lecturer; Tasha Severskaya, an ex-stunt pilot; and William "Noise" Coster, a taciturn musician who provides soundtracks to some of your battles.
While this lineup gets chopped and changed as you progress through the story, it's these three at your side for the vast majority of the game. They're great, and they make the entire squadron feel cohesive, and the stakes feel real when one of them gets in trouble.
The same can't be said for the wider crew of the Carrier Endurance, your home away from home. Your commander and D.D., a propaganda officer of the shadowy Enso Order corporation, are broadly cliched, and spending time with them feels tedious.
Unfortunately, you'll be watching a series of lengthy cutscenes before you're actually flying a plane, and the prologue mission is effectively another cutscene as you escape the vexatious aim of The Shadows, Sotoa's elite pilots.
(Image credit: Bandai Namco Entertainment)There's occasionally mild participation encouraged of you, such as standing up at attention or shaking someone's hand by pressing a button. I'm genuinely somewhat surprised that the series is bold enough to give us QTEs again, after the infamous tragicomedy of the "press triangle to fist pump" moment in Ace Combat: Assault Horizon.
You're not out of the woods when you're done with the first mission, though. Scattered throughout the game like little narrative landmines are cutscenes that go on for far too long and rarely give you a payoff worth your time. It feels like an Ace Combat game that was co-developed by Hideo Kojima at several points. But for all of this opera, the ending feels remarkably flat.
Without spoiling anything, the game spends hours building up a foe who then crumbles within a few minutes of dogfighting. Then it does it again! It makes the stakes feel wasted.
Cloudy with a chance of missiles(Image credit: Bandai Namco Entertainment)None of that matters, though, when you throttle up, break the sound barrier, and punch through the clouds in pursuit of an enemy, or dive, shrieking, towards a tank that you're about to remind about the superiority of being able to move in three dimensions. What clouds, too.
If I may digress for a moment, Ace Combat 8 has by far the best-looking clouds in any game I've played. They rely on proprietary software called Cloudly, and it leads to them feeling far more lifelike than ever before. Beautiful and light on the outside, dense in the middle, like an inverse cookie, they look and feel absolutely stupendous.
Ace Combat has always had a knack for making you feel like an ace, and this new entry is no exception. Wheeling around the sky like Maverick, pulling off impossible maneuvers in a plane like an A-10 Thunderbolt, and pulling up from a collision course at the last possible moment all fulfil the fantasy that the title promises.
Here, you are the greatest pilot to ever live. Difficulty is very well-balanced, too, with the Shadows feeling noticeably tougher, harking back to the days of facing off against enemy aces in F-22 Interceptor on the Mega Drive, if you're as old as I am.
(Image credit: Bandai Namco Entertainment)The problem is, spectacular clouds aside, there doesn't seem to be all that much that separates this game from Ace Combat 7. It harkens back to Ace Combat 5 in a lot of ways: for instance, you can give wingmen commands again and pick their aircraft, but it doesn't seem to make a ton of difference in-game.
Missions are broadly successful or unsuccessful regardless of how you command your wingmen, while loadouts only really matter to the extent of picking roughly the right aircraft for the mission. This leads to the issue of wondering why you'd choose to play this game rather than Ace Combat 7, other than the clouds looking nicer, especially as you can buy it with all DLC for a fraction of the price.
I'm realising how negative a lot of this sounds, and that really does just come down to how cumbersomely crowbarred in a lot of the story is. Once you've been through it and are willing to skip cutscenes, you're left with a brisk, exciting, fun game. It is perhaps emblematic of both the best and worst aspects of the Ace Combat series, with a narrative that feels it has earned plaudits that it doesn't deserve, while the meat of the game is absolutely fantastic.
One key measure of this is that I've been going back to it since I beat it, unlocking new aircraft from the large Aircraft Tree and replaying missions with different loadouts. I'll likely lose a lot of hours to the multiplayer, too, because, once again, it lacks a lot of what there is to dislike.
It's a game that is infuriating in its bloviation, but when you soar above the clouds and take down enemy jets, hearing their cries of confusion over the radio, you won't care anymore. A great, gorgeous game, but one that likes the sound of its own voice just a little too much.
Should you play Ace Combat 8: Wings of Theve?Play it if…You're jonesing for a new arcade flight sim
There’s really nothing else quite like a new Ace Combat game, and it’s well worth getting if you want an exciting, more arcade-like flying experience.
You want to live out all your Top Gun fantasies
There’s no official Top Gun crossover like the Ace Combat 7 DLC, but that doesn’t mean the game doesn’t deliver the same high-octane excitement as the film series.
You want to see the prettiest clouds in gaming
The Cloudly tech behind Ace Combat 8’s fluffy clouds is the real deal. They’re beautiful, realistic, and honestly the best I’ve ever seen in a game.
You're not a fan of melodrama worthy of a Telenovela
The storytelling here is easily the weakest part of the package. It sets up a lot that doesn’t land and is told through overly long, melodramatic cutscenes.
Accessibility settings are limited, but are present. The game features a colorblind mode that changes the green HUD to violet. There are also text-to-speech settings present.
In addition to these, you can also choose between two flight models: one that gives you more granular control over your aircraft and one that makes the game handle much more simply, making it more like After Burner.
How I reviewed Ace Combat 8: Wings of TheveTo review Ace Combat 8, I finished the entire main storyline and then went back to play several missions in Free Mission mode.
I ran the game at high graphics settings on my Nvidia RTX 4070-powered gaming PC and had a generally solid 60 fps that only dipped during particularly hectic moments. I’m yet to go online, but I'm looking forward to trying it out once the servers are populated.
I played the game using a standard Xbox Wireless Controller, which worked perfectly throughout.
Missed a previous puzzle? You can browse the archive and play all TechRadar Crosswords right here.
I'm technically on holiday today, but the crossword cannot stop for anything, so here's another entry in our weekly puzzler.
Don't worry, it's all been prepped ahead of time, so I'm not spending my break coming up with clues. Expect another mix of recent news and general tech trivia in this week's puzzle, which I hope will add a brief bit of fun to your Friday as you challenge for the top of the leaderboard.
Right, I'm off to the coast to enjoy this last bit of sun we're likely to get here in the UK before autumn/fall truly sets in. I'll probably end up doing a crossword or two!
There’s been a lot of recent discussion around artificial intelligence (AI) agents going off the rails and hacking other companies’ websites in a potentially dangerous orgy of subterfuge and destruction. But what if the damage was much closer to home and involved an agent going rogue on your own files? Sadly, that’s exactly what Claude Code just did to one hapless developer.
In a now-deleted post on Reddit, a shocked developer said that Claude Code had just deleted 48,218 files that they had been working on in a live project tree. And all it took was 103 seconds for the AI to wreak its agentic havoc. “This can’t be real” was the coder’s stunned refrain.
The user had tasked Claude Code with rebuilding a mirror of their ongoing project. Unfortunately, the agent discovered that the build_mirror.py script could not refresh the mirror in place, leading to it deciding the best course of action was to create its own cleanup script based on an older copy of the project. This previous project contained 7,332 files.
Although the script used certain safeguards to prevent it deleting linked directories, an oversight meant that only junction-level folders were protected — any nested directories below these folders were apparently seen as fair game by the script. It promptly removed 55,550 files that, when accounting for the 7,332 files successfully copied from the old project mirror, meant that a huge 48,218 files were obliterated in just over a minute and a half.
And because the damage extended to the .git project’s ‘objects,’ ‘refs’ and ‘logs’ folders, there was no way to recover the files and undo the catastrophe. The files were just gone in a puff of smoke.
Somewhat amusingly, the agent posted a message reading “Craig — stop and read this. I broke something,” before detailing its path of destruction. But it probably didn’t seem very funny for the unlucky developer who lost all their work at the push of a button.
Poor code hygiene(Image credit: Generated with Gemini )Although it can be tempting to set an AI agent to work on tedious and laborious tasks, doing so is not without its risks, as this case demonstrates. All it takes is one mistake and a huge amount of work can be undone in seconds.
Part of the blame lies with the original poster, who said in an archived copy of the post that “I was not properly using GitHub or another method for immediate corrections, even though it should have been branching.” Had they been uploading their commits to GitHub or a similar site, their work might have been backed up and salvageable after Claude Code’s reign of terror ended. As one Redditor put it, “Been using GitHub as a save button since before you youngins knew what an AI even was.”
Other commenters pointed out that the developer ran an AI agent — which is known for its tendency to go off-piste — on a live database containing precious data that they couldn’t afford to lose. Good code hygiene, that is not.
And while one person argued that the simplest advice is “Do not let programs run commands on your machine,” even avoiding AI agents altogether would not remedy the poor practices that led to major changes being made on a live production environment without a proper backup.
This incident is a neat reminder of the inherent risks of assigning sensitive or risky work to an AI agent. As we’ve seen in the numerous hacks perpetuated by AI agents, these bots are often laser-focused on their tasks and are willing to take any measures necessary to accomplish them. If that means deleting 48,000 or your files or exfiltrating data from another firm’s website, so be it.