Reviews

Dreo TurboCool Misting Fan 765S review

The Dreo TurboCool Misting Fan 765S has an advantage over traditional fans. While traditional fans provide what feels like a cooling breeze in the sweltering heat, they don’t in fact actually cool the air around you. That’s where the Dreo's clever misting technology comes in, reducing the temperature inside your home.

The brand claims the 765S can drop the temperature in a room by up to 6 degrees Celsius (roughly 11F), which makes all the difference when the mercury is rising.

It’s not the only misting fan on the market — for example the Shark FlexBreeze sits proudly atop our best fans list as I write this — but with super-quiet operation and bold room-cooling claims, can Dreo topple it from its top spot? I’ve put the 765S through its paces to find out.

Setup is pretty simple, but do take a moment before you remove the fan from its packaging. You need to remove the weighted base plate first, then prop the fan tower up on the edge of the box so you can fix the base to the bottom. It clips onto the bottom of the tower and is secured with a screw, included in the box.

There's a variety of protective packaging around the fan that needs to be removed before operation, including cardboard and plastic in the water tank. It’s worth taking your time to check you’ve removed all the various stickers, plastic film and cardboard protection — I did miss a couple of things initially.

(Image credit: Future)

Stand it up, plug it in and then setup is ready to be completed via the free Dreo app. App setup is as easy as the physical. Create an account, pair the app with the fan, enter your Wi-Fi password, and you’re good to go.

And the app is pretty good: it's clearly laid out, although it only offers basic controls (on/off and timer) on the main screen. For any deeper controls, you have to tap the picture of the fan. It’s not difficult, but I’d like to see a few more options without having to tap into another menu.

Fortunately, you're not solely reliant on the app, as there are touch controls on the top of the fan, plus you get a remote (and the two AAA batteries required to power it) included in the box.

With the remote, you can control the power, fan speed, fan mode, oscillation, misting and timer. It feels a little cheap in the hard with a basic plastic shell — Dyson’s remotes are far more premium, plus they magnetically cling to the top of the firm’s fans — but it’s functional and feels sturdy.

It’s annoying that there’s just one fan speed button on the remote though, forcing you to cycle through all speeds levels to get your desired one. I’d rather have up and down buttons for faster control.

(Image credit: Future)

When filling the water tank, it slides out from the front of the fan, and comes with a fold up carry handle to make transportation easier. You might think you don’t need it as you carry it empty to the sink, but once filled to the max level line you’ll find it surprisingly heavy. If you have a shallow sink, you might find filling a little cumbersome due to the size and shape of the tank.

The 765S's design is sleek and modern, with a pillar shape that tapers towards the top. The circular display on the front is bright and easy to read, even from across a room.

And at the bottom of the tower the water tank itself hides a fun feature. Power the fan on and you’ll notice a funky ambient light. It’s not just decorative, as the color can indicate the current humidity in the room. Blue signals humidity of 70%, while orange means the air is dry, at 30% or less. Green signals a comfortable humidity between 30% and 70%.

However, you can just have it illuminated in a color of your choice instead, with no link to the fan's performance or the room’s humidity.

There are three other lighting modes to choose from: constant, breath, and cycle. Constant allows you to pick a color of your choice for the light to be, while breath will see your color selection slowly pulsate. Cycle, as the name suggests, will cycle through a range of different colors, fading from one to the next. I found this to be a handy party mode when I had guests over and we were listening to music.

(Image credit: Future)

But what’s it like as a fan, I hear you scream? The good news is: pretty darn good.

At fan speed two, you can comfortably feel a breeze from four meters away, and it’s very quiet at this level, making it perfect for chatting with others, working, or watching TV. Even at its highest speed (12), I got a peak reading of 65dB directly in front of the machine, which is equivalent to normal conversation. It’s quieter than that when you’re sitting away, allowing you to speak to others without the fan being a distraction.

When it’s warm and you are looking for a breeze to take the edge off, this is all you really need. Higher fan speeds are useful when the fan is placed in larger, open-plan spaces, while the misting function is only really required when the mercury starts to soar.

But when the temperature does rise, the misting function is excellent. There are four misting vents — two on each side of the main airflow vent that runs down the middle — and they’re angled slightly up so moisture is directed into the air, rather than at the floor / furniture.

And it surprised me in two ways. Firstly, there’s hardly any increase in noise when the misting function is on, which means you could leave it on overnight in your bedroom and not be disturbed. Second, I was impressed with how fine the mist produced was. The ultrasonic atomizers used in the 765S produce a 17um ultra-fine mist — this means it evaporates quicker, preventing damp building up on objects nearby.

I could sit comfortably just a meter away from the fan, enjoying the cooling breeze without a sensation that it’s lightly raining. What’s even better is the misting function actually delivers on the claim that it reduces the temperature in your room.

During my tests, I saw a degree knocked off the room temperature after just 10 minutes of misting. It instantly makes a difference, and I was able to set a target humidity so the fan wouldn’t just keep pumping out water unnecessarily.

(Image credit: Future)

Keeping the fan running continuously for several hours, room temperature dipped by another degree, but I never saw more than a 2C drop during my weeks of testing. That’s some way off Dreo’s “up to 6 degrees” temperature reduction claim, and I’m not sure what sort of ideal scenario is needed to achieve this in the real world.

Still, a reduction in temperature is always a win, and the misting adds an additional layer of cooling, keeping me comfortable in what otherwise would have been a stuffy home office.

Dreo says the 6L water tank will last for 24 hours (or more) of run time when the misting mode is enabled, and I’m inclined to agree. I ran the 765S with misting turned on for a variety of different durations, and even during longer four to five hour sessions the water level reduced only marginally.

One slight frustration though was the limited oscillation angle. The 765S can only rotate 90 degrees. For many that’ll likely be enough, but having recently tested the Dyson Find+Follow Purifier Cool that has 350 degrees of movement, the Dreo feels a touch restrictive.

If you live somewhere hot and dry, the TurboCool Misting Fan 765S will provide all-day misting without breaking a sweat. Dreo claims the TurboCool Misting Fan 765S can reduce temperatures by up to 6C and although I didn’t get this level of cooling, it did make a significant difference in the rooms I tested it in, making them far more comfortable to work, relax, and sleep in.

It’s not going to deliver the same cooling as air conditioning, but the 765S offers an excellent middle ground between AC and traditional fans. It can genuinely reduce the heat in the room, keep humidity at a comfortable level, and does it all so quietly you might even forget it’s there.

(Image credit: Future)Dreo TurboCool Misting Fan 765S review: Price and release date

• The TurboCool Misting Fan 765S costs £199.99 / $199.99
• It’s available now via Amazon in the US and UK
• A cheaper, table-top version is also available

The Dreo TurboCool Misting Fan 765S is available for a list price of £199.99 / $199.99, having gone on sale in April 2026. That’s the same price as its core rival, the Shark FlexBreeze, giving it a fighting chance in the market.

If you’re after a more compact offering, Dreo also has the table-top TurboCool Misting Fan 516S for £99.99 / $99.99. Meanwhile the TurboCool Outdoor Misting Fan 711AS — also £199.99 / $199.99 at Amazon — is, as the name suggests, designed for use both indoors and out. So if you’re looking to keep things cooler whether you’re in the garden or in bed, this is the one to go for.

(Image credit: Future)Dreo TurboCool Misting Fan 765S review: Specs

Speeds

12

Modes

4

Control

Remote, app, voice, touch

Max distance

18m

Max speed

10m/s

Max air volume

3007m3/h

Sound level (Max)

65dBA (tested)

Sound level (Quiet Mode)

20dBA

Oscillation

90 degrees

Cord length

1.8m

Product diameter

280mm

Height

1,105mm

Weight

8kg

Water tank

6L

(Image credit: Future)Should I buy the Dreo TurboCool Misting Fan 765S?

Attribute

Notes

Score

Features

There’s a good range of features here, and they work well, from the quiet sleep mode and handy scheduler, to the cooling misting mode and clever illumination.

4/5

Performance

I was impressed with the quiet operation and the misting function that genuinely reduces room temperature (although not by as much as Dreo claims).

4.5/5

Design

Decent design with attractive illumination tricks that are functional and decorative. But it’s not exactly going to wow people, it’s heavy to move around (especially with a full water tank) and the remote feels a touch cheap.

4/5

Value

Competitively priced considering the feature set. If you spot it on discount, I wouldn’t hesitate to purchase it.

4.5/5

Buy it if…

You want a fan that can actually cool down your room
The misting function on the Dreo TurboCool Misting Fan 765S actually brings the temperature of your room down by a degree or two, helping you beat the heat during the day and night.

You want to sleep and keep your fan on
The TurboCool Misting Fan 765S is exceptionally quiet, and you might even forget it’s even on. You’ll easily be able to sleep with the fan set at its lower speeds, and you can even have the misting function on too.

You want hassle-free operation
The 6L water tank can offer misting abilities for over 24 hours, which means you don’t need to be constantly checking the level. Coupled with an intuitive app and smart features, the Dreo 765S is a breeze to use.

Don’t buy it if…

You’re after AC-levels of cooling
The Dreo TurboCool Misting Fan 765S does reduce the temperature of the room it's in with its clever misting feature — something a traditional fan cannot do — but it’s not going to deliver AC levels of cooling.

You struggle to move heavy objects
The 6L water tank alone is heavy enough to lift out of a sink and carry back to the fan, so the two together are pretty weighty. There is a useful carry handle on the back, but it’s a lot of weight to shift by yourself.

You want to use it in a small room
Dreo has a smaller, more affordable table-top version of the 765S that will be great for small offices or box rooms. The TurboCool Misting Fan 516S will set you back £99.99 / $99.99 — that’s half the price of the 765S.

Dreo TurboCool Misting Fan 765S review: Also consider

Shark FlexBreeze
The main competitor to the Dreo, Shark’s FlexBreeze is powerful, near-silent, and incredibly versatile. It can be used virtually anywhere — it transforms from desktop to pedestal, works corded or cordless, and is suitable for indoor and outdoor use. Its misting function is only designed to be used outdoors though, giving the Dreo the edge when it comes to indoor cooling.

Read our full Shark FlexBreeze review

Dreo TurboCool Misting Fan 516S
If you’re sold on the cooling mist of the 765S, but think it’ll be a little too large for your home, Dreo handily has a smaller version made to sit on a table, nightstand, or desk. The TurboCool Misting Fan 516S has many of the same features as its larger sibling, just in a more compact design that won’t cool as large an area.

(Image credit: Future)How I tested the Dreo TurboCool Misting Fan 765S

• Used the TurboCool Misting Fan 765S for several weeks
• Tested in rooms of varying size and temperature
• Tried out the various modes, including misting

I used the Dreo TurboCool Misting Fan 765S for several weeks in my home, testing it in rooms of varying size and temperature. I used it in my lounge to see how effectively it could cool a modest room, had it running overnight in the bedroom to experience how loud it is when sleeping, and in my open-plan kitchen/diner for large space use.

I used the included remote, the free smartphone app, and the on-device buttons to find out how easy it was to control. I also used the misting function in the day and at night to test its cooling credentials.

• Read TechRadar’s reviews guarantee
• First reviewed: July 2026

Xiaomi Robot Vacuum X20 Max review: one-minute review

The Xiaomi Robot Vacuum X20 Max seems like a slam dunk in the robot vacuum space. Positioned right in between the budget and upper mid range sections of the market, it delivers strong vacuum and mopping performance that make it capable of tackling a wide variety of messes in your home.

With LiDAR technology, its mapping is excellent and the robot vacuum does a great job of navigating unexpected obstacles that it might encounter during a clean. The design isn't the most exciting, though it still has a good range of features like an extendable mop arm and automatic carpet detection.

The dock is large, which might make it tricky to fit into smaller homes, but it's pretty capable as well, with hot water washing and air drying capabilities to keep the mop pads clean between uses.

It's all underpinned by a competent app that's easy to use and offers key functions such as being able to schedule cleans, restricting the robot vacuum to certain rooms, and allowing you to customize the vacuuming power and amount of water used by the mop.

The elephant in the room is that my unit developed a fault after a year of testing, occasionally spilling water during a mop pad clean. It's unfortunate and, even though it doesn't seem widespread, makes this model difficult to recommend unreservedly.

Xiaomi Robot Vacuum X20 Max review: price, range & availability

• List price $999.99 / £499.99 / AU$1,199
• Launched late 2024
• No longer available in Australia
• Limited stock in the US

The Xiaomi Robot Vacuum X20 Max has a list price of $999.99 / £499.99 / AU$1,199, and is readily available via the brand’s website in the UK. It often receives discounts too, taking the price down by £100 or so around major sales events. At this price it sits neatly between the budget and upper mid range price brackets, coming in much more expensive than under $300 / £300 / AU$500 favorites like the Roborock Q7 M5 but cheaper than the likes of the Eufy X10 Pro Omni, which goes for $799.99 / £799 / AU$1,699.95.

That latter model is a good point of comparison here, as it also features mop and similar LiDAR sensor setup. With this in mind, the Xiaomi Robot Vacuum X20 Max is very solid value - especially if you get it at that reduced price point. Accessories like replacement brushes, dust bags, and mop pads are all available via the Xiaomi website at pretty reasonable prices too.

Unfortunately, this model seems a lot harder to come by in the US. You can find it on Amazon, but it goes for an eye-watering $999.99 and stock appears limited. At this price it’s significantly worse value and you would be better off spending less on an alternative. Its list price is AU$1,199 in Australia, but it appears to no longer be available either through Xiaomi's own store, or Amazon.

• Value for money score: 3/5

Xiaomi Robot Vacuum X20 Max specs

Suction

8,000Pa

Mopping

Yes

Mop type

Dual rotating discs

Robot size (W x D)

13.78 x 3.82 inches / 350 x 97mm

Robot height

~3.82 inches / ~97mm

Dock dimensions (W x D x H)

13.39 x 16.54 x 22.17 inches / 340 x 420 x 563mm

Dust bin volume (onboard)

15.22oz / 450ml

Water tank volume (onboard)

Not stated

Dust bin volume (base)

84.5oz / 2.5l

Water tank volume (base)

135.3oz / 4l

Self-empty dust

Yes

Self-empty / refill water

Yes

Mop pad cleaning:

Yes

Wi-Fi control

Yes

Xiaomi Robot Vacuum X20 Max: design

• Raised LiDAR puck
• Extendable mop arm

The Xiaomi Robot Vacuum X20 Max isn’t pushing any boundaries when it comes to its overall design, but honestly that’s not such a bad thing.

It looks like your average robot vacuum, which is to say a big plastic disc with a chunky bumper at the front and a whole host of sensors. The most prominent of these is a big LiDAR sensor that sits in a little raised puck on the top, though there are others designed to spot obstacles or prevent the vacuum from falling off ledges.

Despite the basic look, the Xiaomi Robot Vacuum X20 Max has a bunch of useful features including two mop pads, one of which can be extended on a little arm for edge cleaning. The Xiaomi Robot Vacuum X20 Max is also capable of detecting which kind of surface it’s on, raising the mop pads when it goes over carpet to prevent any accidental stains.

Coming in at13.39 x 16.54 x 22.17 inches / 340 x 420 x 563mm, the docking station that it comes with is absolutely ginormous which could make it awkward to fit in smaller homes, but there are some good reasons for this size. Firstly, you’re getting a large 135.3oz / 4l clean water tank (removed for filling by simply popping up the lid on top of the dock) and a slightly smaller but still sizable 128.5oz / 3.8l tank for dirty water storage.

Xiaomi says that this is more than enough water to clean 2,152.8 square feet / 200 square meters on a single fill, and while my testing area was considerably smaller, I can say that it didn’t need refilling across multiple cleans.

(Image credit: Future)

The dock also has a hot water system to help wash both mop pads at 131F / 55C - a temperature that Xiaomi claims reduces odours more effectively. It dries the mop pads using hot air, a process that takes a few hours and produces a small level of sound akin to a desk fan.

There’s also a generous 84.5oz / 2.5l dust bag, which Xiaomi says only needs emptying once every 75 days in a three-person household with one pet. This seems like a very generous estimate to me, and your mileage will vary depending on your specific level of household mess. This bag size is on par with much of the competition, such as the aforementioned Eufy X10 Pro Omni, so you can expect similar performance to those models.

One feature that I particularly appreciate is the ability to remove parts of the dock for cleaning, including the little tray where the vacuum sits while charging. This isn't something that you will need to do regularly, but my previous robot vacuum tracked a decent layer of grime in its dock over the years and was comparatively pretty tricky to clean.

My only real complaint from a design standpoint is the vacuum’s incessant need to narrate what it's doing. By default it frequently declares 'start to dry the mop pad' and similar phrases in a loud, annoying voice. It's disruptive, though mercifully can be turned off in the app.

• Design score: 4/5

Xiaomi Robot Vacuum X20 Max review: performance

• Good navigation
• Deals with multiple surfaces well
• Base station pump developed issues

I've been using the Xiaomi Robot Vacuum X20 Max for a year now, and can say that it handles most daily cleaning tasks well. Its navigation capabilities are excellent and map that it generated of my cleaning area was spot on. I have the base station in the corner of an L-shape hallway and the robot never struggles to find it, even when it's been cleaning the handful of adjoining rooms.

Setting room boundaries works excellently too — if you want to restrict cleaning to a specific defined area, the vacuum won't stray beyond it. It also deals with unexpected obstacles like closed doors or moved furniture well, bumping into them once or twice and then adapting its path smartly. You don't need to worry about multiple surfaces, either. Every time I spot the vacuum going over the rug in the middle of a mop cycle, the pads are automatically raised as it detects the soft surface to prevent damage.

The vacuum picks up small debris and cleans up small spills with no sweat, and for a more intensive task I doused my kitchen floor with oats, cereal crumbs, flour, ketchup, and pretty much anything else that I could find in the cupboard.

How did the Xiaomi Robot Vacuum X20 Max fare? I sent it out on the most intensive possible cleaning mode and it made a commendable dent in the mess. The oats, crumbs, and flour were masterfully hoovered up with the exception of a few survivors in the hardest to reach corners of the room.

The ketchup was more of a challenge, and at first I was pretty worried that it wouldn't be able to overcome it: the mop pads smeared it in a thin layer over the middle of the floor at first but, sure enough, after multiple visits to the base station in order to clean itself and to refill its water tanks, it was all gone after a few runs. I did spot some red residue in the grouting between tiles, but this took just a few seconds for me to wipe up.

It's the kind of performance you would want from a mid-range robot vacuum. It's not a total replacement for doing the cleaning, but it does decrease the need for big cleans.

(Image credit: Future)

That said, my unit has developed a major issue over long-term testing. Sometimes when the vacuum cleans its own mop pads (either at the start or during a cleaning task) the motor that's meant to suck away all the dirty water doesn't kick in. This means that dirty water starts to accumulate in the base station, eventually overflowing and spilling out onto the floor.

It's frustrating (and pretty gross), and I'm struggling to resolve the issue by cleaning the water sensors, fiddling with the base station, and so on. Anecdotally, a family member bought Xiaomi Robot Vacuum X20 Max a few weeks after seeing my one, and it developed a similar fault within just a couple of months. It was, after some back and forth, repaired by Xiaomi.

Looking online, it doesn't seem to be a widespread problem, though I've still been able to find at least a few others who report the same thing. Users on Facebook and Reddit also seem to have had luck getting their vacuums replaced via Xiaomi's support service, though I suspect I can't go through this route with a review sample.

For this reason, I would recommend buying from Xiaomi directly rather than through reseller if you do chose to pick one up, as you otherwise will likely have more trouble getting support if issues do arise.

• Performance score: 2.5/5

Xiaomi Robot Vacuum X20 Max review: app

• Easy to use
• Scheduling features
• Different suction levels

The Xiaomi Robot Vacuum X20 is compatible with the Xiaomi Home app. It's easy to use and has plenty of features, including the ability to view the map generated by the robot, and its location real time. This is on top of the option to start cleans in specific rooms, schedule cleans, or clean the mop pads.

You can view the battery level, and change cleaning modes. These include basic vacuuming, mopping, vacuuming and mopping, or vacuuming before mopping. You can increase the water output too, with three levels to choose between, but bear in mind that this will increase how quickly you will need to refill everything.

I didn't encounter any bugs within the app, and it remained quick and responsive during my year of testing. The fact that you have to set up a Mi account is a bit annoying, but otherwise it offers everything you could from robot vacuum companion software.

• App score: 4.5/5

(Image credit: Future)Should you buy the Xiaomi Robot Vacuum X20 Max?

Attribute

Notes

Score

Performance

Good at vacuuming up debris and cleaning up small spills... when it works as intended.

2.5/5

Design

The Xiaomi Robot Vacuum X20 Max doesn't defy any design conventions, but it's perfectly functional and packed with features.

4/5

App

An easy to use app that offers every feature you could reasonably expect.

4.5/5

Value

Decently positioned in the UK and regularly on sale, but far too expensive if you're in the US and no longer sold in Australia..

3/5

Buy it if… 

You want a robot vacuum capable of cleaning serious mess
The Xiaomi Robot Vacuum X20 Max did a good job dealing with some serious kitchen debris and spills. It requires multiple passes for some wet stains, but it is able to get through large amounts of grime.

You have a mix of hard flooring and carpet
The Xiaomi Robot Vacuum X20 Max does a great job differentiating between different flooring types.

You need a good app
The Xiaomi Robot Vacuum X20 Max's companion app has all the features you could reasonably expect. It's a great bit of software.

Don’t buy it if… 

You need long term reliability
Although likely not widespread, it's hard to ignore the fact that my unit developed a fault after a year of use.

You can't fit a large base station
The base station here is pretty large, is an includes two water tanks in addition to the standard waste bag. Only pick this model if you know you have the space for it.

Xiaomi Robot Vacuum X20 Max review: alternatives to consider

Xiaomi Robot Vacuum X20 Max

Eufy X10 Pro Omni

Eufy Omni S1 Pro

Suction:

8,000Pa

8,000Pa

8,000Pa

Mopping:

Yes

Yes

Yes

Mop type:

Dual rotating discs

Dual rotating discs

Spinning roller

Robot size (W x D):

350×97mm

12.9 x 13.9" / 32.7 x 35.3cm

12.8 x 13.7" / 32.5 x 34.8cm

Robot height:

~97mm

4.5" / 11.4cm

3.8" / 9.7cm

Dock dimensions (W x D x H):

340×420×563mm

14.4 x 18.9 x 18.1" / 36.6 x 48 x 46cm

15.8 x 18.4 x 26.4" / 40.1 x 46.7 x 67.1cm

Dust bin volume (onboard):

450ml

Not stated

0.25L

Water tank volume (onboard):

Not stated

Not stated

0.24L

Dust bin volume (base):

2.5L

2.5L

2.5L

Water tank volume (base):

4L

Not stated

Not stated

Self-empty dust:

Yes

Yes

Yes

Self-empty / refill water:

Yes

Yes

Yes

Mop pad cleaning:

Yes

Yes

Yes

Wi-Fi control:

Yes

Yes

Yes

Eufy X10 Pro Omni
This powerful alternative from Eufy costs about the same as the Xiaomi Robot Vacuum X20 Max and offers excellent cleaning performance and a good app.

Read our full Eufy X10 Pro Omni review

Eufy Omni S1 Pro
The Omni S1 Pro, also from Eufy, is a good higher-end alternative. It's much more expensive, but comes with a raft of extra features to justify the higher price tag.

Read our full Eufy Omni S1 Pro review

How I tested the Xiaomi Robot Vacuum X20 Max

I tested the Xiaomi Robot Vacuum X20 Max in my home for over a year, using it to clean a hallway and two large rooms on a weekly basis. It cleaned a wide variety of messes in that time on a number of different surfaces, namely carpet and tiled flooring. I fully utilized the companion app in order to evaluate its performance and compared the overall experience to other robot vacuums that I own.

Read more about how we test

First reviewed August 2026

My phone hit one bar outside Shinjuku Station, and the "unlimited" SIM card I'd bought at the airport two hours earlier had already burned through its entire 2GB. Just a dead connection and me standing on a street corner trying to remember which exit led to my hotel.

That trip is why I stopped trusting airport SIM counters.

Once I actually started researching eSIMs instead of grabbing whatever the kiosk pushed, one name kept coming up. Business travelers doing three countries a week swore by it. So did car nerds who care more about their infotainment system's connectivity than its horsepower.

That name was Ubigi.

Ubigi has been around since 2017. It's built by Transatel, part of the NTT Group, so you're on Transatel's own core network rather than a reseller riding someone else's coverage.

Ubigi: Plans and pricing

(Image credit: Ubigi)

Ubigi offers three plan types, including one-off, monthly, and annual. Every region also comes in two versions: a standard plan and a "Best" version that covers a different, usually narrower, set of destinations at a different data-to-price ratio.

• One-off: Prices vary by region and by standard vs. "Best" version. Standard Asia runs $9 for 1GB over 30 days, while Best Asia's 25GB for 30 days costs $44.
• Monthly: $17/month for 5GB up to $44/month for 20GB, or $180/month unlimited. All cover the full 201-destination World plan.
• Annual: one payment covers 12 months; allowance refreshes monthly at no extra cost. $210 for 5GB/month (60GB total) or $440 for 20GB/month (240GB total).

Listed prices may change due to currency fluctuations or ongoing promotions, so it's worth double-checking the live plan page before you buy.

Plan Type

Starting Price

Data Range

Validity

Cancellation

One-off

$2

500MB-200GB

1-360 days

N/A, single purchase

Monthly

$17/month

5GB-20GB/month

Renews monthly

Cancel after 3 months

Annual

$210/year

60GB-240GB total

12 months

Non-refundable

Ubigi: Features

• Smart Start: Your plan doesn't start counting down the moment you buy it. The validity period only kicks in once you land at your destination, so you can buy a plan weeks in advance without wasting a single day of data.
• Select Your IP: Switch between your home country's IP and a local one, useful for banking apps or region-locked content that behaves differently depending on where it thinks you're connecting from. It launched in beta for France and US residents, and Ubigi's own site now lists availability extending to Belgium, Japan, Australia, Canada, Germany, Switzerland, Singapore, and the UK too. Worth confirming it's live in your country before counting on it.
• No separate hotspot cap: Tethered data simply counts against your plan's normal allowance; there's no extra fee or reduced limit for sharing your connection with a laptop or tablet.
• Broad device support: Ubigi works with roughly 30 phone, tablet, and laptop brands, not just the usual iPhone-and-flagship-Android list. Older devices, Windows laptops, and less common brands like Fairphone and Panasonic Toughbook are all covered, provided the specific model supports eSIM.

How Ubigi's Lifetime eSIM and Zero Rating Work

The lifetime eSIM specifically covers the profile itself. Once it's installed on your device, Ubigi says it "stays active for future use." That means no new QR code on your next trip. You just buy a new data plan, and it activates on the same profile already sitting on your phone.

To test this, I set up my Ubigi eSIM before a trip to Bangkok, used it for two weeks, and forgot about it entirely once I got home. Three months later, heading to Lisbon, I opened the app, bought a Europe plan, and was online the second I landed. The only catch is switching devices. Ubigi doesn't automatically carry over the profile, so switching to a new phone means reinstalling. You get 5 reinstalls before you need to contact support for a fresh eSIM.

Zero Rating solves a different problem. Normally, running out of data mid-trip means you need Wi-Fi just to load a payment page and buy more. Ubigi keeps the app reachable "even if your data balance is empty," so you can top up without hunting down a hotspot first.

Put those two together, and the setup only happens once. Everything after that is to buy a plan, land, and connect.

Ubigi: Installation and Activation

(Image credit: Ubigi)

Setup takes a few minutes, and you can do it entirely before you leave home. Ubigi supports iPhone, iPad, Android, Windows 10, and 11. Installation is via QR code or the app on any of them.

Here's the process:

• Check compatibility by dialing *#06# on your phone. If an EID number shows up next to your IMEI, your device supports eSIM. Also confirm it's carrier-unlocked, since a locked phone won't accept a third-party eSIM.
• Buy a plan: Choose your destination and data size from Ubigi's catalog and check out.
• Install the eSIM: You'll get a QR code by email. Press and hold it, or scan it, to install the Ubigi eSIM profile on your device.
• Create your account: Sign up through the Ubigi app or at Ubigi.me to track data usage in real time, get alerts, and top up later.

On arrival, make sure Ubigi is set as your preferred mobile data line. You should normally connect without entering anything else, but if you don't, both Android and iOS let you manually add an APN (Access Point Name) of "mbb" in mobile network settings. When you're home, turn the Ubigi line back off.

Ubigi: Compatible Devices

Ubigi updates this list monthly. Support can vary even within the same device family, so check your exact model on Ubigi's compatibility checker or dial *#06# before buying a plan. Either way, your device needs to be eSIM-enabled and carrier-unlocked.

Here's the compatibility picture by brand:

Brand

Compatible Models

Key Exclusions / Notes

Apple iPhone

iPhone XS and XR onward, through the iPhone 17 lineup, plus iPhone SE (2020, 2022)

iPhones sold in mainland China don't ship with eSIM and aren't compatible.

Apple iPad

iPad 7th gen and later, iPad mini 5th gen and later, iPad Air 3rd gen and later, iPad Pro 11" and 12.9"

The same mainland China exclusion applies.

Samsung Galaxy

Galaxy S20 series through S25, Galaxy Z Fold/Flip from the original Fold/Flip through Z Fold7/Flip 7, select Galaxy A, Tab S9/S10, and Galaxy Book models

Coverage varies by exact model; check the list for A-series and Tab entries.

Google Pixel

Pixel 4 and every generation since, including Pixel Fold

No Pixel 3 or earlier.

Motorola

Most Razr and Edge models, plus select Moto G 5G models

Older or budget Moto G models are excluded.

Xiaomi

Xiaomi 12T Pro and newer flagship and T-series models

Redmi Note (except Note 13/14 Pro+) and POCO lines aren't listed.

Other Android

OnePlus (11 and newer, including Open foldables), Oppo Find/Reno series, Honor Magic series, Vivo X-series, TCL, Sony Xperia (10/5/1 series), Sharp Aquos, Nokia (G60/X30/XR21), Fairphone 4+, Crosscall, Rakuten, Revvl, Nuu, myPhone

Support varies significantly by model and region.

Windows laptops

Dell Latitude, HP Spectre/Elite/Probook/Zbook, Lenovo ThinkPad and Yoga, Acer Swift/TravelMate, Asus, Microsoft Surface (Pro, Go, Duo), Panasonic Toughbook

Needs a cellular-capable chipset and Windows 10/11.

Ubigi: Support

(Image credit: Ubigi)

Support starts with a live chat widget on Ubigi's website, staffed by an AI assistant called "Ubi." Ubi handles the easy stuff fine. But anything more complex gets kicked into a support ticket instead of a real back-and-forth, so it acts more like an async help desk than actual live chat. There's no phone line, and you can't reach support inside the app either, only through the website.

Response times depend entirely on when you show up. Reviewers report replies in 10-15 minutes during support hours, but that can stretch to an hour outside them. Worth remembering if your eSIM refuses to activate at 2 am in a country you've never visited.

The help center is where Ubigi actually pulls its weight. Dozens of troubleshooting articles cover iOS, Android, and Windows, from APN settings to moving a profile after you restore a new phone. Between that and the compatibility checker, most setup problems already have a documented fix. You'll rarely need to talk to anyone at all.

Ubigi: Final verdict

For most travelers who fly the same routes repeatedly, Ubigi lands in a strong position. Plans are priced fairly relative to the competition, and the two features covered earlier solve real, specific problems rather than serving as marketing checkboxes.

Where Ubigi asks for a trade-off is in response speed. Support is available via chat and a help center, but it's built around eventual resolution rather than instant back-and-forth; replies can take anywhere from 10 minutes to over an hour, depending on when you reach out.

That's fine if something goes wrong with time to spare, and less fine if you're standing at an airport gate needing an answer in the next five minutes. If real-time support matters more to you than price, easySim or Airalo are worth comparing. For everyone else, Ubigi's own network and the two features above make it one of the more dependable picks in the category.

Ubigi: FAQsWhat is Ubigi?

Ubigi is a Transatel brand, part of Japan's NTT Group. Beyond the travel product most people encounter, Ubigi also runs a separate business-focused version for company-issued devices, allowing IT teams to manage eSIM plans across a fleet of employee phones from a single account rather than juggling individual SIMs.

Is Ubigi cheaper than carrier roaming?

Yes, Ubigi is cheaper than carrier roaming, usually by a wide margin. Ubigi's Europe plan makes a strong case. A full 30 days of 3GB costs $7 total. Most carriers charge more than that for a single week of roaming, and that plan doesn't expire the moment your trip ends either.

Does Ubigi support hotspot and tethering?

Yes. Every plan includes tethering at no extra fee, and tethered data is pulled from your existing allowance. The one catch is on unlimited plans. Speed drops once you cross a destination-specific data threshold, so heavy tethering there hits that ceiling faster than regular browsing would.

Does Ubigi work with an iPhone?

Yes, from the iPhone XS and XR through the current 17 lineup and the iPhone Air, plus both the SE (2020) and the SE (2022). Your phone just needs to be carrier-unlocked. The one hard exclusion is iPhones sold in mainland China. Those ship with eSIM hardware disabled, so no Ubigi plan will work regardless of model or iOS version.

Does Ubigi have a mobile app?

Yes, on both iOS and Android, and most of the same functionality is mirrored on the website or at Ubigi.me. Buy a plan on your phone, check usage from a browser later, and your account stays in sync without logging in twice.

The SteelSeries Stratus+ is a wireless Bluetooth controller built primarily for Android mobile gaming, with wired USB-C support for Windows PCs.

It launched back in 2022 at $59.99 / £64.99, but has since tumbled to sale prices around $25 / £25. It’s a welcome price drop because it’s about the only thing that keeps it in with a shot of being worth picking up, and on the periphery of the best mobile controller conversation — but only just.

SteelSeries positions the Stratus+ as delivering a console-quality mobile experience, and in theory, it has most of the ingredients to do that. A traditional shape that blends Xbox and PlayStation design elements with a removable phone mount, Hall Effect triggers, and a claimed 90-hour battery life via Bluetooth LE. In practice, however, the phone mount that should be the controller's defining feature ends up being its biggest weakness. It’s tricky to install, and once it’s in, it wobbles, spoils the balance, and worst of all, it has a habit of turning your phone off altogether.

Once you have found the sweet spot to mount your phone, game compatibility is then a mixed bag. Fortnite on mobile is often kind on controller compatibility and worked well here, but more finicky titles like Call of Duty Mobile and Need for Speed didn't work at all. Xbox Cloud Gaming fared better, performing well enough with Forza Horizon 6, though compounding Bluetooth latency with remote gaming meant noticeable enough input lag that it forced me into pre-empting inputs rather than driving naturally.

For a mobile controller, the Stratus+ actually performs best as a wired PC controller. Plug it in via USB-C, and it's instantly recognized as an XInput device, fully mapped in Steam, and perfectly functional as a basic controller. The problem is that it's a particularly competitive market, and it does very little to stand out. You could pick up an actual Xbox Wireless Controller for not much more and get a better, more comfortable pad that still pairs to your Android phone.

(Image credit: Future/Alex Berry)SteelSeries Stratus+ review: Price and availability

• List price: $59.99 / £64.99 / AU$159.99
• Now often found as low as $25 / £25 from third parties
• Available from SteelSeries and retailers

The SteelSeries Stratus+ has been around a little while now, first launching in May 2022 at $59.99, though fast-forward to 2026 and that list price isn’t holding up. It’s now often available much cheaper from retailers, and I saw it selling for less than half its list price while pulling together this review.

At full price, the Stratus+ is stuck trying to compete with options like the first-party Xbox Wireless Controller and sits uncomfortably close to the excellent GameSir G8 Galileo mobile grip or the GameSir G8+ Bluetooth controller, all of which offer better experiences in their own way.

At its current discounted price, however, it’s cheap enough to be worth a look as a budget PC gamepad.

SteelSeries Stratus+ review: Specs

SteelSeries Stratus+

Price

$59.99 / £64.99 / AU$159.99

Dimensions

5.9 x 4.3 x 2.5in / 150 x 110 x 63.2 mm

Weight

8.6oz / 244g

Connection

Bluetooth LE, USB-C (Windows only)

Compatibility

Android, Chromebook, PC

Software

None

SteelSeries Stratus+ review: Design and features

• Blends elements from Xbox and PlayStation controllers into a familiar shape
• Included phone mount isn’t really fit for purpose
• Solid D-pad and Hall Effect triggers are the highlight

Before you start messing around with the phone mount, the SteelSeries Stratus+ looks like a perfectly generic controller. The sort of thing you’d see in a film to avoid giving brand recognition to either side of the console war. It borrows PlayStation’s symmetrical thumbstick layout and pairs it with Xbox-style ABXY buttons and a black shell. It's inoffensive, generic, and unexciting.

Holding it, though, something feels off. Despite being almost identical in width to an Xbox Series X controller and actually a touch taller, the Stratus+ somehow feels cramped. Part of that is down to the symmetrical stick placement, I’m sure, as it naturally sits lower on the body and makes the whole controller feel shorter than it physically is. I have reasonably large hands and am very used to an offset stick layout, so it never quite settled. Some of this is obviously personal preference, and if you’re coming from a DualSense Wireless Controller, I’m sure you’ll adapt quicker, though I doubt you’ll escape that sense of being on top of yourself.

The phone mount is where things stray from the norm and, unfortunately, not particularly successfully. SteelSeries includes a detachable clip that slots into the top of the Stratus+ via two metal bars to turn this from a controller into a mobile controller. It doesn’t work well, though, and almost feels like a third-party modkit for a controller, rather than a first-party USP. It’s fiddly to install, and even with the bars fully inserted, there's noticeable wobble before you've even added a phone.

(Image credit: Future/Alex Berry)

Once you do seat a device, the controller becomes top-heavy and unbalanced, constantly wanting to tip backward when placed on a surface and feeling like it’s trying to spill forward out of your hands. The mount clamps your phone from the sides rather than end-to-end, which helps with universality, but means it's also constantly trying to press your phone's power and volume buttons. During testing with a POCO X5 Pro, I had to significantly offset the phone to the right of the cradle to avoid it turning my phone off.

The D-pad is probably the highlight of the entire controller, not something I’ve often said, so it’s nice to see it get its moment to shine. It's firm with a satisfyingly soft press and rock solid with zero wiggle. The ABXY face buttons are generic but functional, and the bumpers are quiet, soft, and responsive.

There are Hall Effect sensors in the triggers with a mid-length travel and linear mapping, though there’s no hair trigger mode and no companion app to set dead zones. The ALPS thumbsticks offer fairly high resistance and felt fine during testing with no drift out of the box, though it's worth noting that these sticks don't carry the same drift-resistance guarantees as Hall Effect alternatives.

(Image credit: Future/Alex Berry)SteelSeries Stratus+ review: Performance

• Bluetooth latency is noticeable at times
• Mobile game compatibility is inconsistent
• Wired PC performance is where it’s at its best

The SteelSeries Stratus+ is trying to be two controllers in one, and in testing, the experience was certainly a tale of two halves.

Connected to my Windows gaming PC via USB-C, the Stratus+ was instantly recognized as an XInput controller and fully mapped as a generic gamepad in Steam. You’d think that’d be the bare minimum experience, but it’s actually refreshing to see it just work, as that isn’t always the case, I’ve found.

I jumped across a few titles in both Steam and Xbox Cloud Gaming, and there's nothing here that would give you reason to reach for a different controller. It’s perfectly fine but equally, there’s nothing worth shouting about, or that would make you recommend this one specifically. It looks like a generic game controller, and it plays like one, but most importantly these days it’s priced like one too, so that’s not a bad thing.

Sticking that weird phone mount into the top and heading to mobile, the experience is considerably less convincing. The SteelSeries Stratus+ connected to my POCO X5 Pro without issue, but game support is a guessing game. Fortnite recognized the controller and played well overall, but displayed PlayStation button prompts on screen despite the Stratus+ using an ABXY layout.

The firm resistance of the sticks offered me plenty of fine control, and any input lag was small enough to be below my skill cap. Call of Duty Mobile and NFS No Limits simply didn't work at all, with no controller recognition and no hardware mapping workaround available.

Again, this isn’t a SteelSeries-specific issue, but competitors like GameSir have built compatibility solutions via their companion apps, so while those games don’t have great native controller support, it’s possible with a little effort by brands.

(Image credit: Future/Alex Berry)

Xbox Cloud Gaming fared better, recognizing the controller natively and without any button mapping issues. Forza Horizon 6 played OK, but this is where the Bluetooth latency became most apparent when stacked on top of the small amount of remote gaming input lag. Racing games demand reactive inputs and a feeling of being connected to your car, and with the Stratus+, there was enough delay to force me into adapting my play style.

Rather than reacting naturally to what was happening on screen as I would normally, I found myself having to preempt my next movement while still executing the last one, building in a mental delay to compensate. It's not catastrophic, and it's less noticeable in games that don't demand constant precision, like the charming Sledding Game or Stardew Valley, which both played fine.

SteelSeries claims 90+ hours of battery life, and while I unfortunately couldn’t devote nearly four straight days to gaming, I can see those numbers being true enough. Despite regular use over a week of testing, the battery percentage reported by Android barely seemed to drop, and any time I was gaming on PC was passively juicing it up again anyway. Curiously, when charging, I noticed there was often quite a discrepancy between what the controller's own LED indicators showed versus what my phone reported.

At one point, I had three solid lights and one flashing during charging, suggesting it should be 75%, yet my phone's Bluetooth settings reported just 47% battery. There’s fast charging available here, so ultimately it isn’t a dealbreaker, as I doubt you’ll be plugged in often, but I’d be inclined to trust the more pessimistic software number over the lights.

(Image credit: Future/Alex Berry)Should I buy the SteelSeries Stratus+ review?Buy it if...

You're looking for a budget wired PC controller and nothing more
At its current street price, the Stratus+ is a functional, no-frills wired gamepad that works out of the box with Steam on Windows. If you need a cheap controller for casual gaming on a PC, it'll do the job.

You want a casual Bluetooth pad for Fortnite or cloud gaming
For supported mobile titles like Fortnite, the Stratus+ is perfectly fine. The same is true for Xbox cloud gaming, though be mindful that compound input lag can be tricky to work with for titles requiring reactive controls.

Don't buy it if...

You want a genuine mobile-first gaming controller
The phone mount is poorly designed, the Bluetooth latency is noticeable at times, and without a companion app, there are real limits to game compatibility. A telescopic controller or even a standard Xbox Wireless Controller paired via Bluetooth will give you a substantially better mobile experience.

You're paying full retail price
The Stratus+ isn’t worth its MSRP and is still not particularly compelling until you get close to the half-off mark it can often now be found at. There are simply far too many better options in the same price bracket if you’re stuck paying full price.

Also consider...

If you're looking for something else in either the dedicated mobile or PC controller space then consider these fine options.

SteelSeries Stratus+

GameSir G8+ Bluetooth

Xbox Wireless Controller

Price

$59.99 / £64.99 / AU$159.99

$79.99 / £79.99 / AU$129.99

$59.99 / £54.99

Dimensions

5.9 x 4.3 x 2.5in / 150 x 110 x 63.2mm

9.06 x 4.21 x 2.17in / 230 x 107 x 55mm

6.0 x 4.0 x 2.5in / 153 x 102 x 63mm

Weight

8.6oz / 244g

10.72oz / 314g

10.1oz / 287g

Connection

Bluetooth LE, USB-C (Windows only)

Bluetooth 5.3, Wired (USB-C), Dongle (sold separately)

Xbox Wireless, Bluetooth, Wired (USB-C)

Compatibility

Android, Chromebook, PC

Android, iOS, Nintendo Switch, PC, macOS

Xbox, Windows PC, Android, iOS

Software

None

GameSir App (Android only)

Xbox Accessories app

GameSir G8+ Bluetooth
If mobile gaming is your priority, something from the GameSir G8+ family is likely a better bet. The telescopic cradle design eliminates all the phone mount problems entirely; Hall Effect sticks and triggers offer drift resistance, and the GameSir companion app provides hardware mapping for unsupported games. It costs more, but the experience is in a different league.

For more information, check out our full GameSir G8+ Bluetooth review

Xbox Wireless Controller
You’ll need to find somewhere to prop up your phone or grab a third-party case/clip, but you can always just pair a first-party Xbox Wireless Controller to an Android phone over Bluetooth. It’ll be a more comfortable solution with more robust native game support, and it plays great on PC too.

For more information, check out our full Xbox Wireless Controller (2020) review

How I tested the SteelSeries Stratus+

• I spent a week gaming with the Stratus+ across a POCO X5 Pro (Android) and a Windows PC
• I tested native Android games like Fortnite and Call of Duty Mobile, Forza Horizon 6 and Sledding Game via Xbox Cloud Gaming, and Steam titles via wired USB-C
• I paid particular attention to things like Bluetooth latency, game compatibility, and phone mount stability

I approached testing the Stratus+ independently as both a mobile controller and a PC gamepad over the course of a week, along with considering whether it successfully comes together as one hybrid unit. On Android, I tested both local titles and cloud gaming, while on PC, I tested through Steam's controller interface and games, along with Xbox Cloud Gaming, to evaluate its viability as a wired desktop pad.

I used a POCO X5 Pro in the included phone mount, paying particular attention to stability, balance, and how comfortable the overall experience was in this arrangement. I played both at home on the couch and at a desk, as well as taking the controller out and about to see how it fared on the move.

First reviewed May-July 2026

Read more about how we test

Ninja Luxe Café Mini Espresso Machine: two-minute review

The Ninja Luxe Café Mini Espresso Machine is a compact version of the Ninja Luxe Café. It doesn't require an enormous amount of counter space, especially considering that this single machine grinds your whole beans directly into your filter, weighs your grinds, brews your espresso or drip coffee, and froths your milk. You won't need any other coffee accoutrements on your counter.

While I did brew some absolutely delicious coffee with the Ninja Luxe Café Mini, there is definitely a learning curve. In fact, I wouldn't say I have mastered the espresso settings yet, even after brewing many cups. Even with the identical espresso settings, sometimes I get just an ounce or so and sometimes I get a lot more. Drip coffee comes out consistently well; no issues there. I also had some trouble frothing the milk; with just a minimum amount of milk in the jug it overflowed onto the counter.

Note that even though this is a semi-auto machine, you do need to have some manual strength and dexterity to get the portafilter properly into place. Be ready for some trial and error. If you're prepared to take on a project, I think you'll be well-rewarded for your efforts.

(Image credit: Karen Freeman / Future)Ninja Luxe Café Mini Espresso Machine: price and availability

• Widely available both in store and online
• Retails for $449.99 USD (£338.50 GBP, $643.73 AUD)
• Only sold in the black and chrome colorway

You can find the Ninja Luxe Café Mini Espresso Machine at many brick and mortar stores and websites, including Amazon, Best Buy, Kohl's, Target, and Ninja's own site. It retails for $449.99 USD (£338.50 GBP, $643.73 AUD) and comes in just the one color, black and chrome.

(Image credit: Karen Freeman / Future)Ninja Luxe Café Mini Espresso Machine: specs

Name

Ninja Luxe Café Mini Espresso Machine

Type

Semi-automatic

Dimensions (L x W x H)

10.24 in L x 12.17 in W x 13.43 in H / 26.01 cm L x 30.91 cm W x 34.11 cm H

Weight

18.96 lbs / 8.6 kg

Brew styles

Espresso (double), Triple (espresso), Classic (coffee), Rich (coffee), and Over Ice (coffee)

Milk frother

Yes

Connected device

No

Ninja Luxe Café Mini Espresso Machine: design

• Efficient design gives it a smaller footprint
• Aesthetically pleasing, goes with any decor
• Five brew styles

The Ninja Luxe Café Mini is efficiently designed to house everything you need to make just about any sort of coffee drink in a relatively small package. When you first unpack it, you will need to determine your water hardness with the enclosed test strip and set your machine accordingly. Run a flush cycle and then you're ready to start brewing.

The machine has a conical burr grinder, a brewing system that makes both espresso and coffee, and a steam wand. It comes with two filter baskets:, a smaller 'double' and a larger 'luxe' basket (unlike most espresso machines, there's no basket for pouring a single shot).

Place the basket into the portafilter, the funnel on top of that, and then slide it into the grinding cradle. Choose your brew style. The machine evaluates your beans and determines a recommended grind size. Turn the grind dial to meet the recommended number and hit the grind button.

(Image credit: Karen Freeman / Future)

Once your ground coffee is the basket, remove the portafilter and tamp down the grinds with the assisted tamper. It has a spring inside so you'll apply just the right amount of pressure.

(Image credit: Karen Freeman / Future)

Then you can remove the funnel, place the portafilter under the Ninja Luxe Café Mini's group head and turn it until it locks into place. This takes some manual strength and dexterity, and the machine's relatively light weight means you have to brace it in place so it doesn't slide around, though it does get easier with repeated use.

You can manually select your level of strength (represented by one, two, or three beans) and temperature or just use the default. When you're done brewing, dispose of the puck of used coffee grounds, and clean the dirty components.

(Image credit: Karen Freeman / Future)

There is also a milk jug and steam wand. To use it, turn the manual valve on the side from brewing mode to frothing mode. The owner's manual includes detailed instructions of how to get the most froth from your milk of choice.

(Image credit: Karen Freeman / Future)

You'll need to clean the tamper, funnel, basket, portafilter, steam wand and jug after each use. You'll also need to empty and clean out the drip tray every few brews, and every time you froth milk. Additionally, you'll need to descale the machine periodically. However, there is no obvious way to get in and clean the grinder. That part never gets wet, but coffee oils will build up there over time.

• Design score: 4.5/5

Ninja Luxe Café Mini Espresso Machine: performance

• There is definitely a learning curve
• You need manual strength and dexterity
• Brew amounts are not consistent

Did you know TechRadar now has membership?

(Image credit: Future)

Become a TechRadar Insider by simply clicking 'Join Now' at the top of this page. Have a question? Please email membership@techradar.com

Overall, I think you'll find that the Ninja Luxe Café Mini will make you some great coffee and espresso drinks. There's definitely a learning curve, but if you have the patience you'll figure it out. Of bigger concern was that sometimes the brewing seemed to just stop short of a full yield, and I'm not sure why. The same beans brewed at the same setting just didn't always yield the same size espresso. This only happened to me while brewing espresso; all three of the drip coffee settings yielded perfect results every time.

There are five different brew settings: Espresso (which is actually a double espresso), Triple (espresso), Classic (drip coffee), Rich (a richer drip coffee), and Over Ice (drip coffee brewed at a lower temperature). I tested all five of them multiple times.

Espresso

The smallest drink you can make is a double espresso, there is no single espresso setting on this machine. The owner's manual says to throw away the first espresso you brew each time you put new beans into the hopper because it takes a couple of brews for the machine to dial in correctly. I tasted it anyway and yes, you should toss it. After that first one, the espresso tasted good though sometimes it would randomly give me a shorter brew. I did notice that I consistently got a beautiful crema.

Karen Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / FutureTriple espresso

The experience of brewing the triple espresso is just like brewing the regular (double) one, only you use the Luxe basket instead of the smaller one. Again, the machine would sometimes give me a tiny brew. Pictured below is one of the smaller triples; other times it was much larger. Otherwise, the espresso was good and always had a lovely crema.

Karen Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / FutureClassic

The Classic drip coffee setting yielded consistently good results. In addition to adjusting the grind size, brew temperature, and strength if you like, you can also choose to brew 6, 8, 10, or 12 ounces of coffee. The user experience of brewing the drip coffee is the same as brewing espresso, except that you skip the tamping step. The machine does something totally different on the inside. You get no crema. And when you go to throw the puck away, it's very wet, as opposed to the drier, crumbly puck you get with espresso.

Karen Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / FutureRich

The rich drip coffee setting works just like the classic, only it yields a richer brew. I find I prefer the classic, as I found it a bit smoother and less bitter, but your tastes may differ.

Karen Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / FutureOver ice

The drip coffee over ice setting might have been my favorite. I found it very smooth and it didn't taste too diluted from the ice.

Karen Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / FutureSteam wand

I found that it took some practice to get the milk frothing just right. I tried just leaving the jug in place and frothing it from there, and it works ok but doesn't produce much foam. I tried following the instructions about angle and movement in the owner's manual, and got too much foam.

The wand will purge itself right after frothing, and you'll want to wipe off the milk from the outside of the wand right away. Otherwise it sticks on there pretty good, requiring a bit of scrubbing to get it off.

Karen Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / FutureKaren Freeman / Future

• Performance score: 3.5/5

Should you buy the Ninja Luxe Café Mini Espresso Machine?Ninja Luxe Café Mini Espresso Machine score card

Attribute

Notes

Score

Value

While not cheap, it does replace five machines: conical burr grinder, coffee scale, espresso machine, coffee machine, and milk frother.

4/5

Design

It looks great on the counter and has a relatively small footprint for all it does.

4.5/5

Performance

There's definitely a learning curve and my results were not consistent, but the coffee drinks especially were quite tasty and the espresso crema was perfect every time.

3.5/5

Buy it if

You want to be the barista

You'll need to put the effort in, but you can be the barista at home with this machine. You control the settings and the results, with help from the machine's sensors.

You want all the coffee accoutrements in one smallish machine

Forget having a separate grinder, scale, brewer, and frother spread out over your countertop. Just one little machine does it all.

You can't decide between espresso and drip coffee

Now you don't even need two different machines for espresso and drip coffee. The Ninja Luxe Café Mini Espresso Machine does both, plus iced coffee and milk drinks too.

Don't buy it if

It's not in your budget

While you'll likely make fewer trips to the coffee shop, and you don't have to buy five separate machines, it's still not cheap.

You don't have great manual dexterity and/or strength

It takes some coordination and muscle to get the portafilter correctly installed in the group head for brewing.

You expect perfectly consistent results with the touch of a button

This machine isn't a fully automatic touch-of-a-button machine. It's not always consistent and there is a learning curve.View Deal

Ninja Luxe Café Mini Espresso Machine: also consider

De'Longhi La Specialista Touch

This one is a little bit more automated and beginner-friendly than the Ninja Luxe Café Mini Espresso Machine while still being pretty small and lightweight. It's also a bit more expensive.

Read our De'Longhi La Specialista Touch review

Ninja AutoBarista Pro Fully Automatic Espresso Machine

While almost double the price of the Ninja Luxe Café Mini, it's worthwhile if you want a one-touch, super easy-to-use machine. It makes about a dozen different beverages including coffee, espresso, iced drinks, and milk drinks.

Read my Ninja AutoBarista Pro Fully Automatic Espresso Machine reviewView Deal

Terra Kaffe TK-02

This fully automatic coffee and espresso machine does it all with a touch of a button or even a voice command to Alexa. Custom design your own beverages. It's the priciest of the bunch, but an amazing machine.

Check out my Terra Kaffe TK-02 review.View Deal

How I tested the Ninja Luxe Café Mini Espresso Machine

I brewed and drank every drink on the menu: (double) Espresso, Triple (espresso), Classic (coffee), Rich (coffee), and (coffee) Over Ice more than once. I used two different kinds of beans for each beverage, first going all the way through the menu with a dark french roast and then again with a medium-dark roast. I frothed two different kinds of milk (almond and skim dairy) several times and added the milk to espresso shots. I cleaned all of the parts that touch the coffee after each use.

First reviewed July 2026

Two-minute review

It’s been almost seven years since Apple Arcade launched, and we’ve seen the service grow from one that focuses predominantly on experimental indie games to something more diverse and broadly appealing. Big exclusive releases like Hello Kitty Island Adventure and Fantasian successfully put it on the map and helped justify the subscription cost, but where exactly does Apple Arcade sit now that many of its best titles have come to traditional console and PC platforms?

Ultimate Guide to Apple Arcade

(Image credit: Apple / Future)

This article is part of our Ultimate Guide to Apple Arcade: the definitive guide to everything that you need to know about the gaming service. Be sure to browse the full series here.

Although I’ve dabbled with it on and off over the years (mainly through the various free trials available to Apple users), I put my head down and spent the last week truly immersing myself in the service with a shiny new iPhone 17 Pro Max to find out. I’ve now played all 279 games (yes, every single one — even those designed for literal toddlers like Thomas & Friends: Let’s Roll+ or My Little Pony: Mane Merge. The latter is surprisingly good, to be fair).

First and foremost, the thing I’ve enjoyed the most about my time with the service has been just how seamless it all is. Finding something to play is as easy as opening up the dedicated Arcade tab in the App Store or the dedicated Arcade app and having a quick scroll. Everything included with the service is neatly categorized into key genres like strategy, sports, card, puzzle, and so on, with new and popular games prominently displayed in case anything catches your eye.

(Image credit: Future)

Once you’ve chosen a game and got it installed, you simply boot it up, and you can get right to playing with no annoying sign-in screens, additional downloads, or intrusive pop-up ads. It all just works, which is the kind of premium experience you would expect from the Apple brand. You can even access everything offline and, as someone who has loaded my phone up with games before a 14-hour flight only to discover with horror that they all require internet account linking or substantial content downloads, it’s hard to overstate how valuable that can be.

The actual game library is pretty compelling too. The fact that many once-flagship games have come to consoles and PC does definitely diminish the appeal slightly if you have access to other platforms, but it’s still a good offering on the whole. It ranges all the way from full-on console to mobile conversions such as Sid Meier’s Civilization 7 Arcade Edition, MySims Kingdom, and Cult of the Lamb Arcade Edition to high-quality originals like Sonic Dream Team.

Loads of nostalgic mobile titles are also present in enhanced, ad-free form, and I’ve really enjoyed going back to the moreish endless running action of Subway Surfers in Subway Surfers+ and Jetpack Joyride in Jetpack Joyride+ and its exclusive follow-up Jetpack Joyride 2. That’s not to say that everything here is a winner, though. Some of the games, like racer Gear.Club Stradale seem fun at first but offer little depth, while a small chunk of the library are just samey card games (Gin Rummy+, Crazy Eights+, Spades+, Hearts+, etc.) with reused animations, assets, and sound effects that just feel like filler.

Still, there’s plenty to sink your teeth into for the relatively modest monthly price, and it’s well worth checking out if you have a compatible device. If you’re a subscriber to any Apple One plan, you already have access to Apple Arcade, so giving the service a go is a no-brainer.

Price and availability

• Costs $6.99 / £6.99 / AU$9.99 a month
• 12 month $49.99 / £49.99 / AU$79.99 plan available
• Also part of Apple One

When it originally launched in 2019, Apple Arcade cost just $4.99 / £4.99 / AU$7.99 a month. This has since gone up to $6.99 / £6.99 / AU$9.99, representing a slight $2 / £2 / AU$2 increase. Even with this factored in, the service is still decent value: it currently offers more than 270 games, and if you play just a few of those every few weeks you’ll definitely be getting your money’s worth.

You can save some cash and make it even better value by purchasing a 12-month plan, which is priced at $49.99 / £49.99 / AU$79.99. Various free trials are also available, with most new Apple devices including a complimentary three-month subscription. If you subscribe to any Apple One plan, access to Apple Arcade is already included.

Features and interface

• Built-in to the App Store
• Also part of the dedicated Games app
• Offers family sharing

For a mobile gaming service, Apple Arcade has a decent set of features. You can access the service through a prominent tab in the App Store, or via the dedicated Games app. You can add friends from your contact list in order to see what they are playing and compare your high scores.

If you want to play together, the likes of Crossy Road Castle offer full online multiplayer while titles such as Mini Motorways or Pac-Man 256+ let you set up competitive score-based challenges with a shared leaderboard in the Games app. These challenges last a set number of days and don’t require everyone to be playing at once, smartly helping you stay connected without the pressure of working out a dedicated play time that works with everyone’s busy schedules.

Unless you’re accessing the service through the Apple One Individual plan, you can share your Apple Arcade subscription with up to six family members at no extra cost, which means you shouldn’t struggle to find people to play with.

(Image credit: Future)

As with most Apple services, the entire Apple Arcade interface is simple but effective. The Arcade tab on the App Store is simply laid out with a good number of categories to browse. New or popular additions alongside games with ongoing events are highlighted so you can jump right in. It all looks and feels carefully curated, which is a big plus.

Although I tested the service using an iPhone, Apple Arcade is also available on a wide range of other Apple devices. It’s also compatible with iPad (and I’ve used it in the past on an iPad Mini), Apple TV, Mac, and even Apple Vision Pro.

Of course, game availability, compatibility, and performance can vary between devices, but it’s still good that you can access your games in a wide variety of formats.

The vast majority of titles can be played without a controller, though many still allow you to hook up a compatible gamepad such as the DualSense Wireless Controller, Xbox Wireless Controller, or many of the best mobile controllers if you prefer.

This is definitely the way to go on Apple TV, where the small included remote could otherwise be quite limiting.

AppleAppleAppleGame library

• Solely focuses on games
• Some good exclusive titles
• A little bit of filler

The Apple Arcade library is entirely devoted to games, and it includes a good range of them. The absolute highlights for me are the exclusive entries in popular console franchises, like Cooking Mama: Cuisine!, Taiko no Tatsujin Pop Tap Beat, or Puyo Puyo Puzzle Pop. They take key series mechanics and smartly rework them for a touch screen format while sprinkling in a few interesting twists.

Sonic Dream Team is a particularly good example of this, borrowing heavily from other Sonic the Hedgehog titles but introducing a unique dream-world setting and the ability to swap between multiple characters on the fly with their own distinct abilities.

They’re all graphically impressive and run smoothly, at least on recent iPhones. Many of them would hold up right alongside the full console entries, which really helps Apple Arcade feel like its own platform rather than a collection of mobile ports.

That’s not to say that there aren’t many ports available on the service. You can play versions of big hitters like Sid Meier’s Civilization 7, Cult of the Lamb, Disney Dreamlight Valley, Stardew Valley, PowerWash Simulator, Vampire Survivors, Dredge, both MySims and MySims Kingdom, and much more. The selection definitely skews towards older games, however, which is somewhat of a shame.

SegaSegaRovioGameloft

There are also plenty of enhanced mobile classics like Subway Surfers+, Smash Hit+, and Jetpack Joyride+, which all have microtransactions and ads removed. There are also some cool exclusive sequels such as Jetpack Joyride 2 and even an excellent exclusive Angry Birds remake in Angry Birds Reloaded, which is crammed with new content.

More casual gamers have plenty of great experiences to choose from, and the family demographic is similarly well catered to with a number of titles specifically designed for younger children.

My only real complaint with the library is that there is definitely a bit of filler. Do you really need multiple apps for different card games, for example, or two competing Sudoku apps?

The number of great Apple Arcade exclusives that have been ported to console and PC is also unfortunate, namely games such as Fantasian and Hello Kitty Island Adventure.

On one hand, I’m glad that more players will be able to experience them, but on the other, losing exclusives does hurt the value proposition of the service. If you own other platforms and only want to play one or two games, it’s worth checking if they’re now available to buy outright elsewhere.

Should I use Apple Arcade? Use it if…

You pay for Apple One
If you pay for Apple One, then you already have access to Apple Arcade. Checking out some of the games on offer is a no-brainer. You might find a new favorite.

Apple is your primary platform
If you own multiple Apple devices and are interested in gaming, then Apple Arcade is perfect for you. One subscription allows you to play across iPhone, iPad, Mac, and Apple TV.

You want a subscription for the whole family
The game library is brilliantly varied, with picks for the entire family no matter what genres or types of games everyone prefers. With the ability to share your subscription with up to six family members, it’s a cost-effective choice.

 Don’t use it if…

The games you want to play are available elsewhere
Loads of great Apple Arcade titles have been ported to other platforms. If you own an Xbox, PlayStation, or Switch and are thinking about subscribing, it’s worth checking that the games you want to play are not already available there.

How I tested Apple Arcade

• Tested for over a week
• Have previously used the service
• Tested using an iPhone 17 Pro Max

I have used Apple Arcade on multiple occasions over the years, mainly through free trials and an Apple One family plan on my old iPhone 15 Plus and iPad Mini. I made the jump to Android back in 2025, so I lapsed until this week, which I spent rigorously testing all of the available games using an iPhone 17 Pro Max and a 12-month membership provided by Apple for coverage purposes.

I mainly played games using touch controls, but still evaluated the functionality of multiple compatible controllers, including the Xbox Wireless controller and DualSense Wireless Controller in addition to some of the best mobile controllers like the Razer Kishi V3 Pro, Backbone One and Backbone Pro.

Read more about how we test

First reviewed December 2019

Dear Gillian,

When I close my eyes, my version of heaven is you sprinkling rose petals across the bedroom of a deserted log cabin while any song from Sade's Love Deluxe album hums softly in the background. Now, when I open them, I can see exactly that in Teenage Sex and Death in Camp Miasma.

It's an understatement to say that Jane Schoenbrun's third movie was my most anticipated movie of 2026, and that was before I knew anything other than the cast list.

The world's worst-kept secret is that amongst queer women, you're considered to be "lesbian God," thanks to The X-Files, The Fall, Sex Education, and the time you said that the Guess remix featuring Charli XCX and Billie Eilish was your most listened-to song on Spotify in 2024. I'd argue that you've even overtaken Cate Blanchett in that respect.

Add Hannah Einbinder, the woman we've vicariously lived through since season 1 of Hacks, into the mix, and I knew audiences would have something special in their hands. But I really didn't foresee just how profoundly, life-changingly moving the end product would be.

There's a lot of spectacular dynamics at play to make this possible, but I think that the beating heart at the center of it is you. As Billy Presley, the reclusive former 'final girl' of the Camp Miasma horror franchise that director Kris (Einbinder) wants to reboot, we get yet another piece of the never-ending puzzle that is your multi-faceted craft.

Teenage Sex and Death at Camp Miasma is more than just a LGBTQIA+ horror movie — it's an epiphany

On the surface, Teenage Sex and Death at Camp Miasma should be a straightforward, almost stereotypical horror movie premise. When Kris is asked to direct a reboot of the disgraced Camp Miasma franchise, she visits original movie final girl Billy, who still lives at the summer camp where it was set. Cue an inversion of reality where the pair are literally running for their lives away from the "big bad," Little Death.

But actually, there are no villains here. This is all just a facade to get you hooked on the true meaty substance of the movie: the subconscious fear in pleasure. For Kris, this manifests in her sexuality, struggling to fully let herself go in the presence of another person. Billy's confident command in leading Kris towards the light (that is, sexual freedom) is... well, satisfying in more ways than one.

Everything is sexy and sensually charged, but nothing is ever gratuitous. It's almost as if Einbinder was inside my own brain before instinctively making her character choices, with every decision Kris makes being the one I'd have chosen myself. She makes no secret of her immediate fascination and hunger for Billy... and isn't that how we react to you as it is?

By now, the internet has worked out that "Little Death" is also how the French describe an orgasm, but I think the significance of the trio's relationship runs so much deeper than just sex. Our spear-wielding villain signifies loneliness, a lack of self-understanding, and a self-imposed inability to give and receive love. Schoenbrun's previous two films, We're All Going to the World's Fair and I Saw the TV Glow, explore these phenomena beautifully, but by God, has she achieved an all-timer here.

Across the board, everything is elevated, from the movie's scale and production design to its soundtrack and grasp on moving through time. Aesthetically, we land directly between fantasy and reality, with hand-drawn backgrounds often representing Billy's romanticized version of her Camp Miasma truth. Kris is the conduit between the two, but when she finally gives herself over to Little Death, she exists in a blissful, ever-moving fantasy that I would now do anything to claim for myself.

The act of pleasure in itself can look like just about anything, and you all innately understand that. As Little Death sits in his video palace with a completely different understanding of what the Camp Miasma movies can mean, I find myself wanting to be brave for them all. I want to scream, cry, and grasp hold of joy for them. I want to meet myself at my most basic, primal level.

But back to you, Gillian

(Image credit: MUBI)

But enough of this... let's get back to you. Armed with a Dolly Parton-esque accent, a bucket of fried chicken and a lifetime's resistance against assimilating back into the real world, Billy Presley is the new-age horror hero I didn't know I needed.

Kris might be the bridge between the world of Camp Miasma and real life, but Billy is our guide between harbored shame and unrelenting freedom. She understands life in a way that most of us never do, perhaps because we've long left our sense of whimsy and suspension of belief behind. To her, Little Death is as real as you and I, and I'm starting to believe the same thing.

You've simultaneously made Billy into the most mysteriously sexy woman alive and an adult posing as the frightened, unsure teenage girl who never grew up after the release of the franchise's first movie. She's a beacon of never-ending wisdom, yet has absolutely no understanding of how the outside world works. She's the embodiment of how people can be everything and nothing all at once, and that is a pleasure to behold in itself.

If she could trap me under that picturesque starlit sky while little on the porch of the cabin she now calls home, I'd never move. If she reached for my hand to stay close through a woodland storm of bloodied clothes and peach skies, I'd walk forever. Kris felt the same way, and now she gets the blissful, blood-soaked happy ever after with her lover that the LGBT+-friendly side of cinema has only let us have a handful of times. The one so many of us long for.

Kris gets it. Einbinder and Schoenbrun get it. And now, I get it too. Teenage Sex and Death at Camp Miasma isn't just a movie, but a life-altering experience, and you made sure of that. In a twisted sort of way, sex, death, and the life we live in between the two have never been more appealing.

Thank you for keeping us grounded in our own pleasure, whatever it looks like.

Yours,

Jasmine Valentine

As far as Taylor Sheridan shows are concerned, nothing is topping Landman. We all know that the Yellowstone creator is most at home in the Western genre, and we seem to want that from him just as much as he yearns to give it.

But Lioness season 3 is an outlier, and with new episodes dropping from August 2, I can't help but feel it remains that way. Closer in tone to the likes of Tulsa King and Mayor of Kingstown, viewers are thrown into the governmental deep end, following an off-the-books special operative group of the titular name, which is led by hot-headed Joe (Zoe Saldaña).

In season 3, Joe's working life has gone from bad to worse. By the end of season 2, she looked to jack her perilous and secretive lifestyle in for the sake of her husband Neal (Dave Annable) and their two daughters, but a leopard can't change its spots.

Credit where credit is due: without giving anything away, the stakes have been raised fatally high as season 3 takes off. The emotion feels a lot more genuine, and now that there are finally no new team members to contend with, we've got the space and breadth to fully invest in everyone present.

But as always, the bombardment of military jargon and circumstances that a civilian will never understand — and will hopefully never have to — feels incredibly alienating.

I'm also often taken out of the moment when Cody, a character played by Sheridan, is featured in episodes. Does this entire IP exist purely to indulge his fantasies of playing soldier? The answer frequently feels like yes.

Lioness season 3 raises the dramatic stakes — and takes aim at AI along the way

But let's get back to the action. Unlike seasons 1-2, which involved different Middle Eastern conflicts at their centre, Lioness season 3 pushes the focus to the brooding tension between Russian operatives and domestic US forces.

Interestingly, Sheridan wastes no time at all addressing real-life crises, including Gaza-Israel and Ukraine-Russia. It's the latter that gets the most expansion, with war on Ukrainian land forming the backbone of the storyline that will send Joe to the brink... and beyond.

It also allows for us to fully consider how AI and technology are shaping how fights are fought on the ground. Within minutes, Errol (Martin Donovan) is seen telling Kaitlyn (Nicole Kidman) that AI is an undoubtedly bigger threat to us all than the potential end of democracy — and that's just the start of Sheridan's blatant takedown.

Much like we've seen across endless social media clips and news reports, the introduction of drones into a warzone also becomes a point of contention. None of this is an angle to modern warfare that I'd even considered, and I'm both impressed and pleased that Sheridan has created the space for that conversation. The Lionesses are raging, and so should we be.

Even amidst the backdrop of change, our team is as strong as ever, and I continue to be bowled over that the busiest working woman on Earth, Nicole Kidman, has made time for such a heavy screen presence. Personally, I think that speaks volumes about the level of craft Sheridan is operating at, and what Kidman thinks of him in turn.

The action itself is fast-paced and unflinching in who or what it takes prisoner. Deaths happen from the get-go, and Joe quickly finds herself reckoning with two different realities. Things feel elevated from what we've seen in the past, which could often become monotonous and inconsequential.

Sheridan really is his own hero, and I applaud that

(Image credit: Paramount+)

You know how watching enough episodes of Grey's Anatomy starts to make you feel like you could be a doctor just through absorbing so many medical terms? Lioness season 3 somehow has the opposite effect.

I don't think there's been one season of the show yet where I've been able to confidently and succinctly explain the overarching narrative of the show. I've never once watched one of the many CIA boardroom scenes and properly been able to follow along with the plan, strategy, or off-the-books mission.

Partly, I wonder if this is down to my levels of practical intelligence, in the same way you sometimes panic during test conditions. But mostly, I think this is a script issue. The dialogue is (rightly) peppered with so much military terminology, but there's rarely a let-up in it. How is the average person supposed to relate to this, unless they've played a lot of Call of Duty?

But my favorite part of Lioness — which is either a positive or negative, depending on how you look at it — is how the show seems to exist simply to fulfil Sheridan's own desires. Once again, episode 1 contains a hefty dose of Delta Force operator Cody, but this time, he's the indisputable hero.

Again, no spoilers here, but Cody essentially leads a mission that is successful almost solely thanks to his own conspiring, and I think of the little boy who must have played with Action Man figures and wanted a slice of combat for himself.

Sheridan has won just as much as we all have with season 3 (except for the many onscreen casualties), in spite of its flaws. The man is allergic to making outright terrible TV, and for that, we should always be thankful.

Australian office furniture company Desky offers some competitively priced chairs to pair with its standing desk range, and the CoilFlex Ergonomic Office Chair is no different. It sits below Desky’s Pro and Pro Plus chairs, but it also features a spring-reinforced cushioned seat aiming to provide responsive, floating support.

Rounding out the seat technology is a mesh backrest for breathability, easy-to-adjust lumbar support, adjustable armrests and an optional headrest. The CoilFlex includes features you’d expect from many of the best office chairs in Australia, but at a mid-range price that’s lower than some of its competition.

I tested the Desky CoilFlex Ergonomic Office Chair at TechRadar’s Sydney office for over two months to find out if it truly offers good bang for buck, as well as all-day comfort and support.

(Image credit: Future | Nico Arboleda)Desky CoilFlex Ergonomic Office Chair review: Price and availability

Aside from its Australian store, Desky also has local stock in the US. While Desky sells through Amazon UK, the CoilFlex isn’t currently listed at the time of writing.

The CoilFlex is available for $499 / AU$599, and the optional headrest costs an extra $50 / AU$50. Easy-glide caster wheels are also available as another add-on for $39.90 / AU$49.90. US and Canadian customers get free shipping, while Aussies pay an extra AU$39.95 for delivery.

Desky rarely offers discounts on its products, save for maybe major sale events like Black Friday, but the discounts aren’t typically too much, which is something worth considering when compared to brands that are more generous with their offers.

Desky CoilFlex Ergonomic Office Chair review: Unboxing and first impressionsDesky CoilFlex specs

Material: Mesh (backrest) and fabric (seat)

Colors: 7 (black, wheat, dark green, blue, peach, yellow and yellow/grey)

Max load: 136 kg / 200lbs

Seat height: 445mm - 530mm / 17.5” - 20.8”

Seat depth: 420mm - 470 mm / 16.5” - 18.5”

User height range: up to 200cm / 6’7”

Adjustability: 6 (8 with headrest)

This isn’t our first Desky rodeo and getting one of the company’s products delivered has always been a seamless experience. Like other Desky chairs we’ve reviewed previously, the CoilFlex came unassembled, but where other brands have neatly packaged parts, everything inside the Desky box looked like they were just thrown in. Thankfully, bubble wrapping and plastic sheets kept scratches and tears at bay, as movement during transport would definitely have left some damage to the parts.

The assembly instructions are also bare minimal and, if this would be your first DIY project, or you’ve never assembled an office chair before, you’ll likely be left scratching your head. There are Desky videos online you can watch to get the chair assembled, but I think a proper manual would have been very helpful indeed.

However, the CoilFlex can be put together without instructions, but it will take some brain power to do so without help from the online video, which also offers insights into adjusting the chair to suit your body — another thing the tiny instruction pamphlet doesn’t provide.

Future | Nico ArboledaFuture | Nico Arboleda

Assembling the CoilFlex can be handled alone, although having someone to help with the seatpan would be ideal, as it’s the heaviest part. Full assembly can take about 15-20 minutes, even if you’re working solo.

We were sent the Wheat color variant for this review and, at first glance, it looked rather lovely. However, the grey wheels and arm pads stand out like sore thumbs, taking away from the overall aesthetic.

If the mismatched color scheme doesn’t bother you — and this does seem to be the case with the other variants of the CoilFlex as well — then you’ll end up with a solidly built chair that looks inviting enough to plonk onto immediately.

Desky CoilFlex Ergonomic Office Chair review: Design and build quality

As I’ve already mentioned, the Desky CoilFlex ain’t bad at all to look at… until you notice mismatched parts which is most evident in the Wheat colorway. While the mesh backrest and optional headrest look stylish enough to stand out from more affordable office chairs, grey wheels and armrests ultimately detract from what is an otherwise solid mid-range office chair.

It’s a strange design choice, and it’s not unique to the one color — all the variants have either black armrests and wheels or grey ones. This doesn’t look too bad on the darker CoilFlex options, like the Black or Blue, but it sure stands out on the others. I would have preferred to have most of the frame in a consistent colour throughout, or at least better contrasting or complementary colours. It makes the chair look like it was made out of spare parts left over from other seats, even though it’s well put together.

(Image credit: Future | Sharmishta Sarkar)

There are some considered design choices, though, and I particularly like that the seat-depth release panel being part of the frame, though it may be a little too subtle and users may not know it exists. It doesn’t help that there’s no mention of it anywhere in the instructions leaflet and I only found out about it from Desky’s promo video. It’s a nice touch to have one less lever to fiddle with underneath the seat.

Overall, I think the CoilFlex looks nicer than the more expensive Desky Pro Plus Ergonomic office chair, but nowhere near as aesthetically pleasing as offerings from some other, more premium brands.

Another aspect the CoilFlex does better than the Desky Pro Plus is in its overall build quality, which I think is superior. The latter’s plastic frame looks cheaper in comparison (we still have the chair in TechRadar’s Sydney office), and the headrest and arms sound and feel rattly when adjusting them, which is not the case at all with the CoilFlex, despite the lower price point. The plastic appears to be of excellent quality and the adjustments are smooth, which makes the chair feel more premium than it looks.

(Image credit: Future | Sharmishta Sarkar)

This chair takes its name from what Desky calls the Dynamic CoilFlex seat cushion technology, a multi-layered design that uses wave springs to provide extra support under a high-density shaping foam. Desky claims the system eliminates pressure points, absorbs movement and maintains alignment, so users can stay energized and focused throughout an 8-hour workday.

Personally, I’d say the claims check out — the seat feels comfortable and responsive as I shift my weight, and I never felt any pressure points developing in my lower back over the two-month testing period. That said, I have no pre-existing back issues, so your mileage may vary. For example, my colleague Sharmishta Sarkar, who has previously reviewed a fair few office chairs, found that the CoilFlex seat didn’t provide the kind of ergonomic support she needed, but she suffers from back issues.

It’s been only a few months, though, so the verdict’s still out on whether the seat’s foam will hold its shape or if the cushion will eventually compress and harden in the process. For reference, the Desky Pro Plus we’ve previously tested now has a flattened cushion seat after two years of use.

Desky CoilFlex Ergonomic Office Chair review: In use

Having tested more expensive office chairs in the TechRadar Sydney office from the likes of ErgoTune and Steelcase, I had low expectations from the Desky CoilFlex with its cheaper price tag and mostly plastic frame.

I was, however, pleasantly surprised at how comfortable it was when I began to use it. The cushion immediately felt comfortable and it felt far better than a lot of other chairs I’ve used previously. That said, it does fall short in terms of comfort and ergonomics compared to the ErgoTune Joobie and the Herman Miller Aeron, both of which I’ve used previously, but credit where credit is due — both the aforementioned chairs cost more, a heck of a lot more when it comes to the latter.

(Image credit: Future | Sharmishta Sarkar)

Even though one of my colleagues wasn’t keen on the minimal lumbar support, I found it to be just right, and a few adjustments to suit my height and body made the CoilFlex feel very good indeed. After two months, my back is still well supported, but potential users with pre-existing musculoskeletal issues might want to look elsewhere.

The adjustments are easy to do with levers under the seat within reach, and pulling or pushing the lumbar support and headrest into position doesn’t require you to get off the chair — just reach and fiddle with either of them until you find the setting that works best for you. The release panel I mentioned earlier for adjusting the seat depth was effective, but I do wish there were better instructions on where to find them as hidden under the cushion and not in an obvious or intuitive spot. The only way you can tell something is under the seat is because of the thin slits on one side of the seat’s plastic frame.

In total, there are 8 points of adjustment, or 6 without the headrest, which is fewer than on the ErgoTune Joobie with its 15 points, allowing for a more finely tuned setup. These 8 adjustment points are more than enough for the average user, though.

(Image credit: Future | Nico Arboleda)

The CoilFlex’s mesh backrest and adjustable lumbar support did an OK job of keeping my posture in check, although I wouldn’t say it fixed my slouching habit. If, like me, you too tend to not mind your posture, again, I would recommend you look elsewhere.

The optional headrest is wide, especially when compared to the much narrower one on the Desky Pro Plus, supporting my neck whenever I shifted, turned or tilted my head throughout the workday.

The mesh backrest is breathable and is of good quality that’s more fabric than plastic (which also makes it more absorbent), but the cushioned seat means your derriere might still be too warm when the mercury’s up.

(Image credit: Future | Sharmishta Sarkar)Desky CoilFlex Ergonomic Office Chair review: Final verdict

If you want a comfortable office chair but don’t want to spend four figures on a Steelcase or Herman Miller, and you also don’t want something cheap and flimsy, Desky’s CoilFlex is a strong mid-tier option that punches above its $499 / AU$599 price tag.

While the seat width is more conventionally sized and may not fit broader body types, the armrests and optional headrest can accommodate taller users (up to 200cm or 6’7”) well. The relatively low 6-8 points of adjustment mean your fit may not be as fine-tuned as more premium chairs that have at least 11 or more, but that’s to be expected at this price point.

The CoilFlex also outperforms its more expensive sibling, the Desky Pro Plus Ergonomic chair, thanks to the new spring-supported seat and a more premium-feeling plastic frame that doesn’t feel as rattly when making adjustments. It still isn’t as good as some of our best office chairs, especially the likes of the ErgoTune Joobie and Vesby that cost a little bit more when discounted, but the CoilFlex is still a solid choice for the price.

First reviewed: July 2026

Q Acoustics 3040c review: Two-minute review

The 3040c is the smaller of two floorstanding speakers in Q Acoustics' celebrated 3000c range — it’s the fifth and final 3000c model, and it’s arguably the best of the lot.

For £599 or equivalent, depending on where you reside, you'll receive two reasonably compact, elegant and nicely finished cabinets (available in four different finishes) with optimised point-to-bracing inside and a three-strong driver array on the outside.

Two 120mm mid/bass drivers sandwich a 22mm soft-dome tweeter that’s decoupled from the rest of the cabinet — and with some input from a rear-firing bass reflex port, a claimed frequency response of 43Hz - 30khz is the result.

Sensitivity of 88dB means you don’t need all that burly of an amplifier to drive these Q Acoustics speakers effectively.

And when they’re being driven effectively, there’s plenty to like in ultimate terms and even more when you keep the price of these speakers uppermost in your mind. They’re a balanced, poised and expressive listen, good at soundstaging, better at maintaining a convincing tonal balance, and best of all when it comes to detail retrieval.

Some of the best stereo speakers on the market? Yes. OK, they could do with a touch more dynamic headroom and a slightly more assured method of expressing rhythms, but really I’m tempted to ask what more you might realistically hope for when listening to a pair of compact, well-made floorstanders for this money…

(Image credit: Future / Simon Lucas)Q Acoustics 3040c review: Price & release date

• $1,099 / £599 (around AU$1,140, based on UK pricing)
• Released July 30, 2026

The Q Acoustics 3040c passive floorstanding loudspeakers are on sale now, and in the United Kingdom a pair will cost you £599. This translates to €899 in the Eurozone and £1099 in the United States (yes, a little pricier in the States) while prices for other territories, including Australia, are yet to be confirmed.

Competition? You'd really be looking at bookshelf speakers for anything as affordable as this from a trusted name — and let me be clear, Q Acoustics is one such name. So, it's a lot of speaker (and speaker tech) for the price.

(Image credit: Future / Simon Lucas)Q Acoustics 3040c review: Features

• 22mm soft dome tweeter
• 2 x 120mm Continuous Curved Cone mid/bass driver
• 43Hz - 30kHz frequency response
• 88dB sensitivity

No one’s expecting a whole lot of features when it comes to reasonably affordable passive loudspeakers, which is just as well given the Q Acoustics 3040c have just the essentials.

As is the company’s standard operating proactive, though, these few features are completely fit for purpose.

On the inside, Q Acoustics has used its targeted ‘point-to-point’ bracing technology — having identified those areas of the cabinet that are prone to low frequency vibrations, ‘P2P’ reinforcement seems to minimise those vibrations and produce a cleaner, better focused soundstage as a result. It’s also deployed ‘Helmholtz Pressure Equalisers’, a series of tubes that minimise internal pressure; this reduces the build-up of standing waves inside the cabinet and keeps sonic colouration to a minimum as a result.

At the rear of the cabinet there are a couple of very low-profile speaker binding posts, positioned just below a fairly large bass reflex port. Q Acoustics provides foam bungs for the ports — so feel free to experiment with the position of the speakers and the effect of the bungs too.

Up front there are three drivers that are familiar from some of the more expensive model ranges in the Q Acoustics line-up. Here, a decoupled 22mm soft-dome tweeter is positioned between two 120mm mid/bass drivers — these are of the ‘continuous curved cone’ design that made its debut much further up the Q Acoustics loudspeaker range.

‘‘C³’ is designed to combine the low-frequency response of a straight conic cone with the control and clarity more commonly associated with a flared cone design. It’s a straightforwardly impressive design with, at this point in time, nothing to prove.

• Features score: 5 / 5

(Image credit: Future / Simon Lucas)Q Acoustics 3040c review: Sound quality

• Full-scale sound with drive and poise in equal measure
• Great facility with detail retrieval
• Could use greater dynamic impetus

Every audio product reviewed at TechRadar (and there are myriad options) has be put into proper context, of course — and so while I’m going to open this section with a couple of mild-ish criticisms, it’s important to remember that these are relatively affordable floorstanding loudspeakers that are likely to form part of a relatively affordable stereo system. Agreed? Good.

So when playing a copy of Phoebe Bridger’s Lost Boys the 3040c don’t have quite the dynamic potency to track the changes in volume or attack quite as fully as they might. They can do more than allude to changes in intensity, of course, but they don’t put quite as much distance between ‘minimum’ and ‘maximum’ as is absolutely ideal.

And while I’m finding fault, there’s no denying the Q Acoustics don’t quite have the instinctive flow that’s required to fully express a rhythm or manage a tempo. Control of low-frequency activity is never in any doubt, and there’s no suggestion the speakers can drag at the rhythm of a recording — but there’s no denying the 3040c could sound more fluent, especially when asked to play overtly rhythm-based material.

But with this griping out of the way, I can concentrate on all the ways the 3040c is straightforwardly impressive.

It’s a very nicely balanced listen where tonality and frequency response are concerned, for starters. Previous Q Acoustics loudspeakers have tended to err on the warm-ish side of neutral when it comes to tonality, but the 3040c is not at all inclined to stick its oar in — any heat (or lack thereof) in the sound you’re experiencing is there before it reaches the speakers, either in the recording or in the source equipment that’s delivering it.

The speakers are poised and even from the bottom of the frequency range to the top; there’s no overstating of any part and no underplaying, just a smooth and balanced representation. The integration of the drivers is first class, and the point at which handover from the bigger drivers to the tweeter takes place is imperceptible.

As well as the low-frequency punch and substance I mentioned, the Q Acoustics deal with the attack and decay of bass information fairly confidently — and they’re just as adept when it comes to midrange resolution. The 3040c are a detailed listen in every respect, and this manifests itself particularly where voices are concerned. There’s plenty of information about timbre and texture made apparent. At the top end there’s similar alacrity, and more than a hint of bite and shine — but with the substance to ensure treble sounds are never hard or edgy.

Despite the lack of ultimate dynamic headroom, the Q Acoustics do good work with the more minor, but no less significant, dynamics of tonal and harmonic variation. They can identify and reveal even very fleeting and/or subtle occurrences in a recording, and coherently lay them out as part of the overall presentation. If there are details embedded in a recording, the 3040c do their utmost to get them to you.

• Sound quality score: 4.5 / 5

(Image credit: Future / Simon Lucas)Q Acoustics 3040c review: Design

• 942 x 285 x 281mm (HxWxD)
• Magnetically attached grilles
• Choice of four finishes

You have to hand it to Q Acoustics: the 3040c look, and even to an extent feel, like much more expensive loudspeakers than they actually are.

The standard of build and finish is excellent, and even the vinyl wrap that covers the MDF cabinets of my ‘Claro’ walnut review sample is a cut or two above the norm — and I am confident that is also the case if you prefer the ‘pin’ oak, satin white or satin black alternatives.

The 942 x 285 x 281mm (HxWxD) dimensions mean the proportions of the cabinet are harmonious. That ‘width’ measurement includes the small aluminium stabilisers that fit to the back of each cabinet and make it less susceptible to rocking or, heaven help us, toppling. The look of the cabinet is further enhanced by the crisply rendered curves along each horizontal edge.

Q Acoustics supplies magnetic grilles, but for my money you’re better off leaving them in the packaging and enjoying the sight of the driver array instead. The satin nickel brightwork that surrounds them is a confident touch, and another little flourish that suggests the 3040c might cost a fair bit more than they actually do.

• Design score: 5 / 5

(Image credit: Future / Simon Lucas)Q Acoustics 3040c review: Usability & setup

• Attach the stabilisers and spikes
• Connect to an amplifier using appropriate speaker cable
• Toe in just a little towards your listening position

Well, they’re passive loudspeakers and so setting them up and using them is hardly rocket science.

You’ll need to attach the little outrigger stabilisers to the bottom of each cabinet, and then attach the floor spikes. These can be adjusted from the top, so getting the cabinets level is no hardship.

Then, connect the speakers to the amplifier that’s driving them with speaker cable — ideally two identical lengths. And then try to make sure the speakers are toed in, just a fraction, towards the spot from where you do your listening.

• Usability & setup score: 5 / 5

(Image credit: Future / Simon Lucas)Q Acoustics 3040c review: Value

• You'll struggle to find decent floorstanding speakers for this money
• Q Acoustics is a trusted name — and the 3040c are worthy of that heritage

This money won’t even get you on the ladder at some loudspeaker companies, but Q Acoustics first made a name for itself by redefining what ‘entry level’ ought to mean where booth sonic performance and build quality are concerned.

It almost goes without saying that the 3040c does nothing to spoil this reputation — and as a result, it represents prodigious value for money for anyone who wants a fairly big sound from a fairly compact and unarguably affordable floorstander.

• Value score: 5 / 5

(Image credit: Future / Simon Lucas)Should I buy Q Acoustics 3040c?Q Acoustics 3040c scorecard

Attribute

Notes

Score

Features

One cannot expect a plethora of features with passive speakers, but Q Acoustics' proprietary audio architecture is beautifully made and finished

5 / 5

Sound quality

I have minor gripes with dynamic impetus — borderline churlish for this money, but it's my job to notice

4.5 / 5

Design

They look and feel far more expensive than they are

5 / 5

Setup & usability

Simple and easy, and not just because they're passive speakers (although that helps)

5 / 5

Value

This money won't get you on the ladder with most trusted speaker brands. Here, it gets you floorstanders…

5 / 5

Buy them if…

Your room is on the smaller side
These are compact towers, and while they need a bit of space in which to operate they don’t need loads

You want a speaker capable of surviving an upgrade or two
The 3040c will work happily with entry-level amplification, but are able to punch above their weight if you try something a little more capable

You appreciate a bit of stealth design
There’s nothing showy or try-hard about the industrial design language Q Acoustics is dealing in here

(Image credit: Future / Simon Lucas)Don’t buy them if…

You listen to lots of rhythm-centric music
They don’t have two left feet or anything, but the 3040c aren’t the most fluid when it comes to rhythmic expression

You have boisterous pets (or boisterous friends)
Those stabilisers are a good idea, but it doesn’t mean the Q Acoustics are topple-proof…

You like a bit of shock and awe in your music
The 3040c are just fractionally inhibited when it comes to large-scale dynamics

Q Acoustics 3040c review: Also consider

Part of the appeal of the 3040c, in addition to the way they look and sound, is the money Q Acoustics wants in exchange for a pair. It’s genuinely hard to find a pair of floorstanding loudspeakers from a brand anything like as credible as this one for anything like the money — even brands such as DALI, Fyne Audio or Monitor Audio (to name just three) start their floorstanding ranges with models costing several hundred of your chosen currency more than this.

If you're happy to consider bookshelf models however, look to the Dali Sonik 1 or even Cambridge Audio L/R S. But again, they're not floorstanding speakers.

How I tested the Q Acoustics 3040c

I connected the 3040c to a WiiM Amp Pro using a couple of lengths of QED loudspeaker cable, and then connected a preamplified Technics turntable to the WiiM’s single analog input.

I used a Rega CD player, connected to the amplifier’s digital optical input, and also streamed via Bluetooth and Tidal Connect using an Apple iPhone 15 Pro. Which meant I was able to listen to music in lots of different formats, and at lots of different resolutions, more-or-less non-stop for a week or so.

• Read TechRadar's Reviews Guarantee
• First reviewed: July 2026

DJI Osmo Pocket 4P: One-minute review

The Pocket 4P marks a big moment in DJI’s hugely popular series of compact vlogging cameras, being the first model with two lenses, even if Insta360 stole its thunder with the Luna Ultra, which it released in June.

I’ve already reviewed the single-lens Pocket 4, and it’s a brilliant handheld 4K camera. The ‘P’ version is largely identical but for its dual-lens array and a ‘refined’ 1-inch sensor that's equipped with LOFIC tech, plus a new D-Log 2 color profile.

@techradar

♬ original sound - TechRadar

For the most part, you can discover all you need to know about the Pocket 4P's design and performance in my Pocket 4 review. In this write-up, I'll focus on the new features of the bulkier model, and the real difference they make.

And I can say this right now: now that I’ve tried the Pocket 4P, it’ll be hard for me to return to single-lens models like the Pocket 4. That additional 3x telephoto lens unleashes a wide variety of shooting options to complement the highly capable ultra-wide main camera. On-the-go sequences with DJI's superb subject tracking in play, for example, can be particularly dynamic. It really is like having two cameras in one tiny device.

Two lenses means twice the camera (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

That being said, there is an inevitable design compromise: twin lenses make for a bulkier camera unit, with inexplicably no protective housing currently available, and a top-heavy design. If you already own a Pocket, and are wondering if the new Pocket 4P is worth it, or if it’s worth jumping ship from DJI to the Insta360 Luna Ultra, check out my Pocket 4 vs Luna Ultra article.

For me, the first-generation Luna Ultra is a compelling alternative with its 8K video and detachable module, but I can also tell that the Pocket 4P is a fourth-generation product — it feels more polished overall. It has neat accessories of its own, too, such as the magnetic fill light and remote module. As such, DJI's dual-lens Pocket 4P is now my top compact vlogging-camera pick.

DJI Osmo Pocket 4P: price and release date

• Announced on May 14 2026 at Cannes Film Festival, available from July 30
• Available in black or white versions, priced from £529 / AU$959. No US availability at launch
• Variety of bundles available, including a Vlog Combo kit for £605 / AU$1,099

With twin sensors / lenses, the Pocket 4P's mark-up over the single-lens Pocket 4 is justified. The 'P' version is excellent value. (Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Despite essentially having no competition in markets such as drones and, previously, gimbal vlogging cameras, DJI has always priced its products competitively. It usually undercuts rivals where actual alternatives exist, too, such as GoPro and Insta360 action cameras.

Insta360 outright said it wasn’t going to compete on price, but rather on features when speaking about its Luna Ultra, and that has turned out to be the case. Where the Luna Ultra starts at $770 / £650 / AU$1,230, the Pocket 4P comes in at £529 / AU$959 — though it's not available in the US at launch. Meanwhile, the single-lens Pocket 4 costs from £429 / AU$749.

Considering that the Pocket 4P has the extra camera with its own sensor, that price increase over the Pocket 4 feels completely justified, and in my book the Pocket 4P is excellent value, especially when you consider the quality of the 4K video footage it's able to produce.

The Pocket 4P is available in Black or White versions, and there are bundles available. The Vlog Combo, for example, includes the DJI Mic 2 Mini wireless mic, remote controller, fill light, tripod stand and tripod grip, and costs £605 / AU$1,099 — that's the bundle I'd go for.

• Price score: 5/5

DJI Osmo Pocket 4P: specsDJI Osmo Pocket 4P specs

Lens(es):

20mm f/2.0 (1-inch sensor), 60mm f/1.8 (1/1.28-inch sensor)

Video:

4K and 1080p up to 60fps, plus slow motion up to 240fps

Photo:

Up to 9.4MP in RAW & JPEG, up to 37MP in SuperPhoto mode

Storage:

107GB internal, microSD card slot

Battery:

1,545mAh, up to 3.5 hours Full HD record time

Charger type:

USB-C / optional fast PD charger

Weight:

8.1oz / 230g

Dimensions:

159.5 x 63.3 x 33.5mm (L x W x H)

DJI Osmo Pocket 4P: Design

• Dual 20mm f/2.0 and 60mm f/1.8 lenses
• Otherwise the same design as the Pocket 4, with rotating screen and gimbal-mounted camera
• USB-C charging and 107GB of internal storage in addition to micro SD

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)

Save for the bulkier dual-camera system and a total weight of 8.1oz / 230g, the Pocket 4P’s design is identical to the Pocket 4; it’s extremely compact, features a 2-inch touchscreen which rotates 90 degrees between vertical and horizontal formats, and a customizable five-button array, with a joystick that controls gimbal movement or zoom.

The extra two buttons, revealed when the screen is rotated to horizontal, help speed up access to various settings. For example, the C button can be assigned for direct access to two custom profiles — handy if you regularly switch between, say, color settings such as D-Log and shooting modes such as slow motion.

It certainly pays dividends to spend time customizing the camera to suit how you use it, so that you’re not fussing with settings when you're out and about.

For me, the single-lens Pocket 4 feels perfectly balanced, and it’s notably smaller than Insta360’s Luna cameras. The 4P, however, somewhat sacrifices that advantage on the alter of dual-camera versatility — it’s a little top-heavy, and I found it more comfortable to use with a tripod grip and mini tripod attached. The Luna Ultra feels more balanced because its handle is bulkier (see the Pocket 4 / 4P / Luna Ultra comparison photos, below).

Gimbal movement still feels smooth, and the shots steady and smooth, despite the extra weight of the cameras.

DJI Pocket 4 (left), DJI Pocket 4P (right)Tim ColemanDJI Pocket 4 (left), DJI Pocket 4P (right)Tim ColemanDJI Pocket 4P (left), Insta360 Luna Ultra (right)Tim ColemanDJI Pocket 4P (left), Insta360 Luna Ultra (right)Tim ColemanDJI Pocket 4P (left), Insta360 Luna Ultra (right)Tim Coleman

At launch there's no hard-shell protective case for the Pocket 4P, as there is for the Pocket 3, nor a slimline gimbal protector, like you get with the Pocket 4. This means the bulkier camera module remains somewhat unprotected, which is something DJI needs to be rectify ASAP.

There are also no dedicated ND filter kits from DJI at launch, though I fully expect that situation to change very soon through third parties (it might even have done so by the time you read this).

As with the Pocket 4, there’s the fill-light accessory, which attaches magnetically to the gimbal’s arm and is powered by the camera, and which lets you choose between three brightness levels and three color temperatures.

The light won’t make much of a difference to your images in bright daylight, but in low light and for indoors, it’s game changing for vlogging. I found the warm setting at the medium brightness level was a sweet spot for the times I wanted to use the light.

The Pocket 4P turned off, where its lenses sit out horizontallyTim ColemanAnd turned on, the lenses sit verticallyTim ColemanThe main 1-inch ultra-wide 20mm f/2.0 camera (bottom), and the new 3x telephoto f/1.8 camera (top)Tim ColemanThe screen rotates 90-degrees between vertical and horizontal formats. When shooting vertically, two control buttons are hidden by the screenTim ColemanBut they are revealed in horiztonal formatTim ColemanNote the top gimbal arm is magnetic and accepts a fill light accessory, which is powered by the camera and has three brightness settings, and three color temperature settingsTim Coleman

Then there’s the tiny remote control, borrowed from the Osmo Mobile 8P. This easily connects to the Pocket 4P over Bluetooth, and can be used to remotely view and control the camera. It’s a neat answer to Insta360’s modular controller in its Luna cameras, though the DJI module doesn’t feature a built-in mic, as Insta360’s does.

For occasions when you're taking hands-free shots with the Pocket 4P rested on a surface or support, the remote controller is super-handy. The controls are slightly stripped back versus the camera’s control layout, but the key controls, such as touch subject-tracking, record, and gimbal movement / zoom are there.

• Design score: 4.5/5

DJI Osmo Pocket 4: Performance

• Improved subject tracking
• 107GB of built-in memory added
• Higher-capacity battery extends record times

A major feature in Pocket cameras is subject-tracking autofocus. You really don’t want to be messing around moving the gimbal manually with the joystick, which can be fiddly and jerky. Thankfully, subject tracking, the latest version of which DJI calls ‘ActiveTrack 7.0’, is super-reliable — you double-tap on the subject, and the camera does the rest. For me, it performs slightly better than Insta360 Luna’s tracking, even if it does at times feel like its ‘keeping up’ with fast-moving subjects rather than keeping them central.

Battery life is solid, though you will notice it drop quicker with certain modes, such as 4K 60fps video recording, hyperlapse, and slow-motion 240fps. The camera also gets pretty warm pretty quickly when using these modes, though I’ve not had it overheat and shut down during my testing.

Future / Tim ColemanTim Coleman

With compact vlogging cameras such as the Pocket series, the battery is non-removable, so you are relying on that USB-C rechargeable internal unit. I found myself conscious of having to charge the camera on heavy use days — that’s life with a Pocket. There is, however, an optional battery grip available to extend shot life.

In addition to a microSD card slot, DJI includes a generous 107GB of built-in storage. That’s enough for a lot of 4K clips, even when utilizing the maximum 200Mbps bit rate.

Recording internally, you'll need to transfer files either over Wi-Fi or wired USB-C. Thankfully, there’s next-gen Wi-Fi 6 and USB 3.1 support on board, delivering fast transfer speeds and making for an efficient workflow on the move.

As with other Pockets, the 4P can get a little warm when you're using its more power-hungry features, such as 4K 60fps and hyperlapse. I've not had any overheating issues to the point where the camera shuts down, but I was aware of the camera warming up while holding it.

• Performance score: 5/5

DJI Osmo Pocket 4: Image and video quality

• 1-inch sensor ultra-wide camera, and a new 3x telephoto, up to 12x zoom
• D-Log2 profile with up 17EV dynamic range
• Low-light further boosts the improved 14 stops dynamic range

There is one minor difference between the Pocket 4P and Pocket 4’s ultra-wide 20mm f/2.0 camera: the ‘refined’ 1-inch sensor, which unleashes a new log color profile, D-Log 2.

DJI says the refined sensor features LOFIC tech — which in simple terms is like super HDR, only it works in real time, which differs to HDR. I first came across the term LOFIC when reviewing the Oppo Find X9 Ultra phone.

The fruit of LOFIC and D-Log 2 is an expanded 17 stops of dynamic range, while the regular Log profile has around 14 stops. D-Log 2 is only available with the ultra-wide camera because it’s linked to the sensor tech, whereas the new 3x telephoto camera uses a separate 1/1.28-inch sensor.

D-Log 2 also isn’t available in every shooting mode, such as Slow Motion 240fps, although like the Pocket 4, that 10x slo-mo is available in 4K, or up to 200fps when using the 3x telephoto camera.

I’ve shot the same clips in D-Log 2, D-Log and ‘Normal’ color profiles (all 10-bit) to make quality comparisons, especially regarding dynamic range, and to see how easy it is to grade the footage for a consistent look. I’ve also shot using some of the built-in color profiles, such as ‘NC film’ and ‘Movie’.

The level of detail that the Pocket 4P is able to hold, especially in D-Log 2, is majorly impressive, especially for such a small and affordable camera. For me, outright 4K image quality is where DJI has the edge over Insta360, and most leading smartphones.

Is D-Log2 enough reason to upgrade from the Pocket 4? Not for me, but there is a more compelling reason: the second camera. The 60mm f/1.8 telephoto optic is essentially a 3x portrait lens, with a pleasant shallow depth of field for upper-body vlogging and shooting closeup details. It’s limited to D-Log or Normal color profiles, but the overall quality is really, really nice, and the footage gives a totally different perspective to the ultra-wide camera's.

Where that 3x lens really shines is when it’s coupled with some of the Pocket 4P’s major features, such as active tracking. With the tighter perspective, creative camera movements tracking a subject on the move can look particularly dynamic, especially where there are other objects in the foreground.

The zoom capabilities are further extended — where the Pocket 4 was limited to a 2x lossless zoom and 4x digital zoom, the Pocket 4P again has the 2x lossless zoom with the ultra-wide lens, plus 6x lossless with the telephoto lens and up to a 12x digital zoom.

The quality of that 12x zoom is okay at a pinch, but if quality is your main concern, I wouldn’t go beyond the 6x setting.

I don’t like the way the heavier dual-camera setup impacts how the camera feels in the hand, but it’s a game-changing feature for this type of camera, and for me it now feels impossible to return to the single-lens format.

The Luna Ultra goes one step further for resolution, with 8K video recording. Personally, I’m happy with a camera that is limited to 4K recording, but whose quality at this resolution, especially regarding dynamic range and color, is more pleasing on the eye. That's the Pocket 4P.

• Image and video quality score: 5/5

DJI Osmo Pocket 4P: testing scorecardDJI Osmo Pocket 4P

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Price

Pricier than the Pocket 4 but cheaper than the Luna Ultra. You're getting a lot of camera for your money

5/5

Design

The dual lenses are a success, but in otherwise keeping the same body design, the Pocket 4P feels top-heavy

4.5/5

Performance

Industry-leading image stabilization and subject tracking, decent battery life and generous internal storage

5/5

Image and video quality

Yes it's 'only' 4K, but the Pocket 4P can shoot gorgeous footage up to that resolution, especially with the second lens

5/5

Should I buy the DJI Osmo Pocket 4P?Buy it if...

You want more from your Pocket
The dual lenses are a revelation, broadening the kind of shots you can make versus the single-lens models that are restricted to an ultra-wide field of view.

You want the most polished and feature-rich compact vlogging camera
Sure, the Luna Ultra comes with innovative features, but the Pocket 4P has its own unique tricks, and overall it feels like the more polished camera.

Don't buy it if...

You don't need the second lens
Many people have happily been vlogging with a single-lens Pocket camera for years. If you only need that ultra-wide angle, it's wiser to stick with the Pocket 3 or opt for the Pocket 4 instead — they're physically smaller, and cost less.

You want the smallest possible Pocket
The dual-camera setup wins for versatility, but it does result in a bulkier, top-heavy design when compared to the regular Pocket 4.

DJI Osmo Pocket 4P: also consider

DJI Osmo Pocket 4

Don't need the second lens? You'll save a packet by opting for the Pocket 4 instead, which otherwise has essentially the same features, and get a more streamlined camera, with a neat gimbal protector to boot.

Read our in-depth DJI Osmo Pocket 4 review

Insta360 Luna Ultra

Love the sound of dual lenses in a compact vlogging camera? The Luna Ultra is a compelling and strikingly similar alternative, but with 8K video recording and a neat detachable module which comprises the screen, key control and built-in mic. The Luna Ultra arguably wins on innovation, but the Pocket 4P wins by being more polished. The Luna Ultra is pricier than the 4P, too.

Read our in-depth Insta360 Luna Ultra review

How I tested the DJI Osmo Pocket 4P

(Image credit: Tim Coleman)

• DJI loaned me the Pocket 4P Vlog Combo kit for a couple of months ahead of the July 30 release
• I shot plenty of 4K footage with the various color profiles, and used the various accessories
• I compared it to the single-lens Pocket 4 and dual-lens Insta360 Luna Ultra

I used the DJI Pocket 4P for almost two months ahead of my review embargo, during which time I regularly shot 4K video using the 20mm and 60mm lenses, the various frame rates up to 240fps, and the range of color profiles, including the new D-Log2. I tried the various shooting modes too, such as hyperlapse, and took photos in the regular and SuperPhoto modes.

In the Vlog Combo kit was a DJI Mini 2 Mini, remote module and fill light, and I tested both those accessories. I generally recorded onto the camera's internal memory, transferred files through USB-C and checked transfer times, ran the camera battery down, and checked recharge times using the supplied USB-C cable.

During my review period I also had the Pocket 4, enabling me to assess the key differences between the single- and dual-lens models. I also had the rival Insta360 Luna Ultra, again allowing me to make direct comparisons.

• First reviewed: July 2026
• Read more about how we test

KitchenAid KF3: Two-minute review

The KitchenAid KF3 Fully Automatic Espresso Machine is the middle child of the company’s 2026 release of a trio of compact bean-to-cup coffee machines, sitting below the KitchenAid KF4 and above the KF2. Because of its slim build, it’s a great option for smaller kitchens, but it can easily service a larger household thanks to four customizable user profiles and a solid selection of over 15 coffee-based drink recipes.

It benefits from KitchenAid’s IntelliGrind system — also featuring on the company’s larger machines like the KF8 and KF6 — that automatically determines the best grind size depending on the beans you pour into the top-mounted hopper. During my testing, I found it consistently delivered a well-extracted and tasty espresso.

The KF3’s automatic milk system uses a hose that you need to place into your own container (the KF4 uses a similar system but includes a container), letting you make a variety of drinks including lattes and cappuccinos. Despite not claiming to work with non-dairy milks, I found it delivered a good level of foam when using a barista-style oat milk.

KitchenAid has given the KF3 a couple of iced coffee recipes too. As with the KF4, and other machines I’ve tested such as the Philips LatteGo 4400 Series, you need to put some ice cubes in your glass or cup first, and KitchenAid claims that the machine will brew espresso at a lower temperature. However, when checking the temperature of a regular shot at 'medium' temperature and an iced-espresso shot with a food-grade thermometer, both registered at around 40ºC / 104ºF, meaning the iced espresso was still hot enough to melt the ice, resulting in a lukewarm and diluted drink.

The other slight niggle I have with the KF3 is that it goes through water quite quickly as it performs a rinse cycle on startup and shutdown. I can understand the latter process to clean out the internals, and the rinsing of the milk hose to keep everything hygienic, but the start-up rinse cycle seemed unnecessary. Fortunately the rear-mounted water tank is quite large at 1.8L, but if you have a larger household or you drink a lot of coffee each day, you'll be refilling it regularly.

Overall, however, the KitchenAid KF3 is a fantastic mid-range automatic espresso machine that’s well made, brews delicious drinks and is ultimately easy to maintain. In fact, I'd say that it does more than enough to compete with the best coffee makers.

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)KitchenAid KF3: Specifications

Name

KitchenAid KF3 Fully Automatic Espresso Machine

Type

Bean-to-cup

Dimensions (H x W x D)

14.2 x 7.7 x 18.5 inches / 361 x 196 x 470mm

Weight

19.8lbs / 9kg

Water reservoir capacity

1.9 quarts / 1.8 liters

Milk frother

Yes (automatic)

Bars of pressure

15

Noise level

72dB grinding, 60dB brewing

User profiles

4

KitchenAid KF3: Price and availability

• Launched in UK and US April 2026, Australia in July 2026
• List price $999.99 / £749 / AU$1,349

The KitchenAid KF3 Fully Automatic Espresso Machine launched first in the UK and US in April 2026, and eventually made its way to Australia in July 2026. It has a list price of $999.99 / £749 / AU$1,349, meaning it’s one of the company’s more affordable machines, while being classified a mid-range option in the grand scheme of things.

Only the lower-spec KF2 is cheaper at $799.99 / £699 / AU$1,099 if you want an automatic machine, while the Semi Automatic Espresso Machine is cheaper still, although that naturally requires a bit more hands-on involvement.

The top-tier model in this latest series, the KF4 ($1,299.99 / £899 / AU$1,599) offers much of the same functionality as the KF3, albeit with a wider selection of recipes, a bigger touch display and ships with a milk carafe.

The similarly specced Philips LatteGo 4400 Series is also worth considering in this price range, with its list price of $799.99 / £599.99 / AU$1,199.

• Value score: 4 / 5

KitchenAid KF3: Design

• Compact size makes it great for smaller spaces
• Milk system is simple to use and clean
• No dishwasher-safe components

At first glance, the KitchenAid KF3 looks very similar to other models in the company’s lineup, from the KF4 and up to the KF8 (there’s currently no KF5). It’s more compact than the KF6-8, but the same size as the KF4 and KF2, at 14.2 x 7.7 x 18.5 inches / 361 x 196 x 470mm (H x W x D), making it easy to slide onto a kitchen counter. And slide it you can, as there are two small wheels on the bottom at the rear, so you can lift from the front and move it forwards and backwards with ease.

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)

Looks-wise, it adopts a similar aesthetic as the rest of its siblings. It’s boxy, with rounded corners, and is available in either Porcelain White or Matte Black. To cut manufacturing costs, KitchenAid has ditched the predominantly metal build of the larger models, replacing it with plastic. It still looks and feels very much a premium product though.

The clearest indicator that lets you know this is the KF3 is the small 2.4-inch / 6cm color display. The KF2 doesn’t have one at all, while the KF4’s color screen is larger and touch enabled. It’s a relatively low-resolution screen compared to the likes of the Philips Café Aromis, but is still bright and clear, and the use of color helps to identify the drink you want to make.

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)

The KF3's display is flanked by 10 touch buttons: four that provide quick access to user profiles, drinks menu, rinsing cycles and machine settings; two to initiate and cancel brewing; and four to cycle forward and back through menu options, return and select.

The top-mounted hopper is large enough to accommodate 250g of coffee beans and, as with the other compact machines in the series, it features a removable opaque lid with a silicone seal. This means you can’t easily see the amount of leftover beans (there’s a clear audible indication if it doesn’t have any to grind) but, then again, the beans aren’t exposed to light and air, keeping them fresher for longer.

Future / Max LangridgeFuture / Max LangridgeFuture / Max Langridge

Furthering its benefits for smaller kitchens, the lid is removable rather than hinged means it’s easy to fill the hopper if you have the KF3 positioned under a wall cabinet. There’s also a small chute for pre-ground coffee, and a scoop is included in the box.

The 1.8L water tank slides in and out the rear of the machine and has an integrated handle to make the process simple, although I personally prefer the side-mounted tank on the Philips LatteGo 4400 as it makes refilling a little bit easier. However, the KitchenAid’s tank features a hinged lid, so more often than not I would leave it in place and pour water in from a jug.

KitchenAid supplies a water filter with the KF3 that it says is good for around two months of use. It was initially a little fiddly to install, but the included coffee scoop doubles up as a tool that clips onto the filter, giving you the extra length needed to screw it into place.

The drip tray is deep and extends virtually the full depth of the KF3, and has a large spout at the back for easy emptying. Used coffee grounds are deposited into a removable bin in the center that can be tipped out when full — you'll see a notification on the display when it's time to do so.

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)

The KF3’s milk system uses a silicone hose that connects to the side of the dispenser located on the front of the machine. You need to insert one end of the hose into a small socket, while the other end drops into a tall glass or bottle. KitchenAid offers a sealed container with a double-ended hose as an optional extra for $59.99 / £39 / AU$59, which is included with the KF4 by default.

The KF3 features a thorough rinsing cycle for the hose to ensure it’s kept clean, but note that none of the removable parts are dishwasher safe.

Lastly, the height of the coffee dispenser can be adjusted to suit a variety of cup sizes, including large mugs and tumbler glasses. I found I needed to use a little bit of force to move it, but this is a minor niggle.

• Design score 4.5 / 5

KitchenAid KF3: Performance

• Well-extracted espresso time after time
• Good, but not great, milk foaming
• ‘Iced’ drinks still hot
• Four customizable user profiles

The best thing about the KitchenAid KF3 Fully Automatic Espresso Machine is that you can confidently rely on it to deliver an excellent espresso with every use. The IntelliGrind system automatically determines the best grind size depending on your chosen beans to ensure it brews a tasty shot with good crema. I used medium-roast and dark-roast beans during my testing period and I was more than satisfied with the results in each case.

The fact that you don’t have to worry about grind size makes this a fantastic option for coffee novices who aren’t sure how to get the best results. If you're not entirely satisfied, then you'll find a lever hidden behind the side compartment (which provides access to the brewing unit) that you can use to adjust grind size to a finer or coarser level. I ultimately left it at the default setting in the middle.

That being said, the KF3 does give you the option to adjust the strength and body of the espresso. Strength is denoted on a scale of one to three, with the difference being the dose of coffee that’s ground into the brewing head — 7g being the lightest strength and 14g being the strongest.

Future / Max LangridgeFuture / Max LangridgeFuture / Max LangridgeFuture / Max LangridgeFuture / Max Langridge

You can also select light, medium or strong body, which relates to the rate at which water flows during extraction. A strong-bodied coffee, for example, takes the longest, as the water flows through slowly to extract the most amount of flavor.

You’re also able to adjust the volume of coffee delivered for each drink and the water temperature.

Auto Milk is KitchenAid's milk-foaming system and it works well, although I’m of the opinion that a steam wand will always produce superior results. I was, however, pleased to find that it worked well with plant-based milks, despite not having a dedicated option. Coffee machines that cater specifically to plant-based options, such as the KitchenAid KF8, will heat it to a lower temperature compared to dairy for optimal results.

When I made a cafe latte using a barista-style oat milk, I found the KF3 produced a good level of foam with a silky texture, and at a drinkable temperature. I achieved similarly good results with full-fat dairy.

(Image credit: Future / Max Langridge)

There are four user profiles on the KF3 for you and your household to store their own drink preferences. While the KF4 lets you name them, they’re fixed at User Profile 1, 2, 3 and 4 here.

KitchenAid understands that iced drinks are popular, even at home, and has given the KF3 dedicated presets for cold coffees. In theory, the shot the machine dispenses is brewed at a lower temperature, although you do still need to put ice in your cup or glass, but that didn't seem to be the case in reality.

I used a thermometer to measure the temperature of both a regular espresso shot and an iced espresso shot and found them to be similar. The regular shot was around 50ºC when brewed at a medium temperature, while the iced shot was around 45ºC. I conducted this test twice, with the same results both times.

As such, the iced espresso shot was still too hot and melted the cubes in my cup relatively quickly, resulting in a diluted drink. If you like your cold coffees, you'd be better off considering other machines like the De’Longhi Dedica Duo and the Jura J10 that offer proper cold-extracted espresso.

The KF3, like other KitchenAid espresso machines, is QuietMark-certified, indicating it should be whisper-quiet in use. That’s something I can certainly attest to, as I recorded around 70dB while grinding and 60dB when brewing, using the decibelX app on my iPhone and standing next to the machine in a relatively quiet space. That puts it on par with the KF4, although we found the flagship KF8 to be quieter still with an average of 44dB during the entire coffee-making process.

Future / Max LangridgeFuture / Max Langridge

Keeping the KitchenAid KF3 clean is incredibly simple. Not only does it automatically complete a rinse cycle on startup and shutdown (which, as I mentioned does mean the water tank can empty relatively quickly), but it will also prompt you when it’s time to empty the ground container and drip tray. It will also ask you to rinse the milk system after every use. You can skip this process at first, but when you turn the machine off — or it automatically shuts down after a predetermined amount of time — it won’t do so until the hose has been flushed.

There are further and more thorough cleaning procedures within the settings menu for washing the brewing unit with special cleaners, and a couple of tablets are included in the box. You will need to buy descaler and a milk system cleaner separately.

There’s also an option to evaporate all the water from the system entirely, which my colleague Cat Ellis has previously expressed as being a feature she wishes all automatic espresso machines had. This is particularly useful if you know you’re not going to be using the machine for an extended period of time and keep it hygienically dry for the duration.

Future / Max LangridgeFuture / Max LangridgeFuture / Max Langridge

• Performance score: 4 / 5

Should you buy the KitchenAid KF3?KitchenAid KF3 score card

Attribute

Notes

Score

Value

Well-priced considering the features and functionality.

4/5

Design

An attractive design that’s compact enough to suit all kitchens.

4.5/5

Performance

Excellent performance for hot coffee-based drinks, and milk foaming is good. Iced options aren’t quite up to scratch, however.

4/5

Buy it if...

You have a smaller kitchen

The KitchenAid KF3 is compact enough that it should fit into most homes, especially those that are short on space.

You want fuss-free coffee

The KF3 does virtually all of the work for you. All you need to do is select your preferred drink and it will be delivered perfectly each time.

You want value for money

The KitchenAid KF3 is well priced considering its features and the fact it’s from a premium, well-known brand.

Don't buy it if...

You want to really fine tune your coffee

The KF3 has options for adjusting various aspects of a coffee, but if you want to get really hands on, then you’ll need to look elsewhere.

You want authentic cold brew

The KitchenAid KF3’s iced coffee options aren’t as cold as they should be, with brewed espresso being hot enough to quickly melt ice.

KitchenAid KF3: Also consider

If you're not sure whether the KitchenAid KF3 is the right espresso machine for you, here are three other options to keep in mind.

Philips Cafe Aromis

This machine is more expensive than the KF3, but the investment is worth it. It brews delicious espresso, has a more legible screen, can brew proper cold-extracted coffee and foam cold milk, and has a genuinely useful app. It’s not available in Australia, however.

Read our full Philips Cafe Aromis review

Philips LatteGo 4400 Series

I’ve mentioned this Philips machine several times in this review for good reason. It performs similarly to the KF4 and is equally compact. It too falls short where iced coffee is concerned, and there are only two user profiles, but it can often be found at a cheaper price.

Read my full Philips LatteGo 4400 Series review

Ninja Luxe Café

This bean-to-cup espresso machine can not only make hot coffee drinks, but it can even do drip filter coffee and cold brew. It’s super easy to master and is regularly discounted.

Read our full Ninja Luxe Cafe review

KitchenAid KF3: How I tested

I used the KitchenAid KF3 for two weeks, and having already spent time with the KF4, I was well versed with what to expect from the slightly lesser-specced machine. I prepared a wide range of drinks with and without milk, and used two different styles of coffee beans to test the IntelliGrind feature on the KF3.

I used a barista-style oat milk and full-fat dairy milk to test the automatic milk-foaming system, and ran the machine’s recommended cleaning cycles.

Read more about how we test

First reviewed July 2026

Light spoilers follow for Spider-Man: Brand New Day.

Spider-Man: Brand New Day was meant to signal a fresh era for Tom Holland’s Peter Parker. With 2021’s Spider-Man: No Way Home effectively clearing the narrative slate and stripping away his safety net, this latest chapter had a golden opportunity to chart a bold, unburdened new course for a character whose cinematic journey now enters its 24th year.

And yet, tripped up by familiar Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) shortcomings and weighed down by my own sky-high expectations, Brand New Day yields a final product that is undeniably fun, but ultimately falls short of greatness.

Web of lies

"What's going on with you, Spider-Man?" (Image credit: Sony Pictures/Marvel Entertainment)

Four years have passed in-universe since No Way Home, whose ending saw Doctor Strange cast a multiverse-saving spell to make everyone, including Parker's girlfriend M.J. (Zendaya) and best friend Ned (Jacob Batalon), forget that he was Spider-Man.

Since then, our friendly neighborhood hero has fully committed to cleaning up the streets of New York City. While that mission has been incredibly successful, it's come at a cost — that being said, the webslinger is practically shedding his civilian identity and becoming a social recluse.

Brand New Day yields a final product that is undeniable fun, but ultimately falls short of greatness

That long-term, self-imposed isolation has seemingly dire consequences for Spider-Man, whose world is not only upended after he sees M.J. with a new man, but also by a sudden metamorphosis — one that super-charges his arachnid-like abilities — that he struggles to control.

Throw in the emergence of a powerful and invisible new threat that only Spidey can apparently stop, and the Marvel icon must turn detective, determine if this new superpowered being is as bad as he's been led to believe, and once again realize that with great power comes great responsibility.

Brand New Day's action is well worth the entry fee (Image credit: Sony Pictures/Marvel Entertainment)

That infamous slogan is one that Holland and director Destin Daniel Cretton hung their proverbial hats on throughout development.

The pair have spoken at length about making a Spider-Man movie unlike anything we've seen before, and that's especially true from an action spectacle standpoint. Whether it's the fights that Spidey's involved in — the Hulk and The Hand battles deserve special mention for being intense and imaginative — or simply giving us a first-person view of him swinging through his hometown, Spider-Man 4 is the webslinger at his acrobatic, wily, and inventive best. Full credit to Cretton, stunt co-ordinator and second unit director Peng Zhang, and his team for delivering some of the best action in a Spider-Man film to date.

I was disappointed that Spider-Man 4 didn't examine Parker's hermit lifestyle more thoroughly

Brand New Day isn't as adept at depicting loneliness and other mental health issues, mind you. Indeed, for all of the talk that Brand New Day puts Peter Parker in a mental and emotional echo chamber, that's not entirely accurate.

Sure, Parker spends much of the first two acts lying to himself about why he has to maintain his lone wolf status, a storytelling quirk that allows Holland to further tap into Parker's guilt complex and the volitional burden of responsibility he carries. Even so, he still interacts — and characteristically quips — with everyone who appears in the Marvel Phase 6 flick, and, while it would be a puzzlingly dialog-light film for a usually extroverted character if he didn't, I was disappointed that Spider-Man 4 didn't examine Parker's hermit lifestyle more thoroughly throughout its 142-minute runtime.

M.J. and Ned have slightly smaller rolls in Spider-Man 4 compared to their previous MCU film outings (Image credit: Sony Pictures/Marvel Entertainment)

In fact, the movie's broader emotional impact didn't hit me as hard as I'd hoped.

Yes, there are myriad moving moments — particularly in the third act — where Holland, Zendaya, and MCU newcomer Sadie Sink deliver emotional gravitas aplenty. Sink, whose much-discussed mystery character in Spider-Man 4 I’ll come back to shortly, gives a performance that easily leaves a lump in the throat

Nevertheless, Thunderbolts* tackles its weightier themes — particularly around mental health — with a sensitivity that Spider-Man 4 lacks. Heck, I'd even say No Way Home and another of Holland's previous MCU outings in Spider-Man: Far From Home hit me much harder emotionally than this fourth entry; a take I certainly didn't expect to have prior to my Brand New Day screening.

Lost souls

Spider-Man and The Punisher's crowd-pleasing odd-couple dynamic is a sight to behold (Image credit: Sony Pictures/Marvel Entertainment)

Its action notwithstanding, Spider-Man: Brand New Day does a much better job at making New York feel like a city populated by more than one hero and villain at any given time.

It's no coincidence that sequences involving Bernthal and Holland are some of the funniest and most memorable

That might sound silly for a shared universe like the MCU and for a film franchise that's seen the wallcrawler mingle with other Marvel characters. Still, the fact that he shares the screen with individuals who haven't operated in his orbit before is a positive, especially when, the Avengers movies aside, Marvel appears determined to keep its heroes apart despite their situational proximity.

It's an ingredient characterized best by Spider-Man's quarrelsome, sibling-like dynamic with Jon Bernthal's Frank Castle, aka The Punisher.

Ordinarily, Bernthal's foul-mouthed, unhinged anti-hero would have no place in a family-friendly MCU flick. However, his inclusion in Brand New Day allows Bernthal and Holland's incredibly natural chemistry to shine, and it's no coincidence that sequences involving the pair are some of the funniest and most memorable that Spider-Man 4 has to offer.

Test yourself with our Tom Holland Spider-Man movie quiz!

Think of yourself as a Tom Holland Spidey super-fan? See if you have what it takes to be crowned by the best of the best by tackling our extremely tough Tom Holland Spider-Man movie quiz!

The film’s self-contained, 'pick-up-and-read' comic book vibe further extends to Spider-Man: Brand New Day's full cast of characters.

Returning favorites like Mark Ruffalo's Bruce Banner/The Hulk alongside newcomers in Tramell Tillman's Bill Metzger and Liza Colón-Zayas' Jean DeWolff add to its narrative flavor. However, its overstuffed roster leaves a slight aftertaste as few of them get the necessary development or screentime they require.

Who are you under the hood, Ms. Sink? (Image credit: Sony Pictures/Marvel Entertainment)

Among the supporting cast, Sink gets the most substantial character arc. Brand New Day waits until the 70-minute mark to finally confirm who she's playing, but it compensates for the inevitable reveal by soon putting the Stranger Things alumnus at the heart of its tale, albeit with mixed results.

On the upside, Spider-Man 4 thoughtfully draws parallels between Holland and Sink's characters. Driven by opposing worldviews rooted in personal tragedy, their dichotomous dynamic fuels the second act, and I'll readily admit I was completely engrossed by their superhuman tango.

I was completely engrossed by Holland and Sink's superhuman tango

The problem that Brand New Day runs into is that, by placing Sink at its narrative center, it quickly succumbs to the classic MCU pitfall: setting up future storylines instead of concentrating on its actual protagonist.

Indeed, by act three, Spidey becomes something of a passenger in his own film, and it isn't until its admittedly poignant climax that the focus shifts back to the wallcrawler. That's no slight on the talented Sink's performance, but, not for the first time, it's hard to watch another Spider-Man solo movie and not think that the titular hero has, at times, been overshadowed in his own story.

My verdict

From a recency bias viewpoint, it would be easy — and arguably lazy — to label Brand New Day as the best Spider-Man movie of all-time.

In some ways, you can argue that's true. This is the most relatable Peter Parker has ever felt in a live-action capacity; it ditches the weary multiversal shenanigans in favor of returning to the character's classic street-level roots, and is Holland's most mature outing yet as the legendary webslinger.

That said, while its ending strikes an optimistic note for an all-but-confirmed fifth solo film, Brand New Day is an ironic title for a movie that — much like its protagonist for large parts of this flick — refuses to move on from the past. Its sentimental attachment to legacy characters like Ned and M.J., paired with obstructive MCU world-building, reveals a franchise that hesitates to be as progressive as it could and should be. It’s an endlessly entertaining, ground-level Spider-Man story — it just can’t quite bring itself to let that brand new day truly dawn.

Spider-Man: Brand New Day is out now in the UK, and hits theaters in the US and other regions on Friday, July 31.

HP Omen 16 Slim: Two-minute review

In these strange times where PC memory prices seemingly double by the day, an affordable gaming laptop is a tantalising prospect. But is it actually realistic? Enter the HP Omen 16 Slim, HP's latest mainstream gaming portable.

There are two core variants of the Omen 16, a standard-sized model and this so-called "Slim". Long story short, this Slim model is a little skinnier but still isn't exactly super compact for a 16-inch laptop, thanks to not only a fairly hefty lower screen bezel, but also a chassis that sticks out beyond the base of the display. At least the slightly tanky proportions translate into a tanky chassis with a solid feeling keyboard bed.

Anyway, it's the value proposition that matters and that means getting into the specs. CPU-wise, we're talking Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, which is a pretty modern 16-core chip from Intel's Arrow Lake generation. Here it's configured with 24GB of DDR5 in dual 12GB SoDIMMs. But various configs are available, including 16GB and 24GB.

There's also 1TB Gen 4 SSD, but with any gaming laptop surely the most important single component is the GPU and it's no surprise to find an Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 8GB doing the pixel pumping duties.

(Image credit: Future)

It's one up from the bottom of Nvidia's RTX 50 Series laptop GPUs, but it gets the full feature set, including all the latest DLSS upscaling bells and whistles. It outputs to a 165Hz 16-inch LCD display with a native resolution of 1,920 by 1,200 pixels, making it a 16:10 aspect panel rather than the usual 16:9 ratio.

The battery is a pretty generous 70Wh item, meanwhile, and networking includes WiFi 6E, Bluetooth 5.4 and Ethernet. Slightly less impressive is the physical connectivity. Not only are you limited to just one USB-C port (plus three USB-A), it can only do a measly 10Gbps. So, the only video out is the single HDMI 2.1 port.

Of course, gaming performance is the key metric here, and the results are pretty good, albeit with one major caveat. This skinnier Omen 16 Slim makes do with 110W of Total Platform Power (TPP) and 80W maximum for the GPU, where the full-sized Omen 16 cranks that up significantly to 170W TPP. Given premium gaming laptops can supply as much as 175W and more just for the GPU, you can see how 110W for everything, including CPU, RAM and storage, can be a limiting factor.

That said, the RTX 5060 GPU is pretty efficient and well matched with the 1200p (near-enough 1080p) 165Hz display. You'll need to use DLSS upscaling to get slick frame rates in the most demanding games. But, broadly, you'll get fairly smooth results at very high detail settings. What's more, the chassis doesn't get too hot and the fan noise is moderate.

All of which means HP has done a nice job with the HP Omen 16 Slim. It's well built, mostly well specified and delivers a pretty sweet gaming experience. Whether it makes sense as a buy comes down to pricing. As configured here with 24GB of RAM, it's a little spendy. But there's an otherwise identical 16GB model that we just spotted for a whisker under $1,200. Right here in 2026, that's a very decent deal.

HP Omen 16 Slim review: Price & availability

(Image credit: Future)

• Available for £1,499 in the UK with 24GB of DDR5
• The closest US config rocks 16GB of DDR5 for $1,599
• Looks out for deals on sites like Newegg

In this precise configuration with 24GB of DDR5 RAM, the HP Omen 16 Slim weighs in at £1,399 in the UK. That's actually very good given current memory prices, right now. Indeed, you could argue it would make sense to knock that back to 16GB, keep everything else the same, and save some money.

Indeed, in the US, just that configuration is available, while the 24GB option is not. With 16GB, you're currently looking at $1,599, which is a fair bit less appealing. Currently, an otherwise identical version but with an RTX 5050 instead of the RTX 5060 can be had for $1,198 on Newegg, which implies you might be able to bag one with the 5060 and 16GB for around $1,400 at some point if you hang around and wait for a deal. At that price point, the HP Omen 16 Slim would start making a lot of sense.

HP Omen 16 Slim review: Specs

Base spec

Review config

Price

$1,189 / £1,100 (estimated UK price)

£1,399 / $1,799 (estimated US price)

CPU

Intel Core Ultra 7 255H

Intel Core Ultra 7 255H

Graphics

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop GPU

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop GPU

RAM

16GB DDR5

24GB DDR5

Display

16-inch 1200p (1,920 x 1,200), 144Hz, IPS, 300 nits

16-inch 1200p (1,920 x 1,200), 165Hz, IPS, 400 nits

Storage

1TB NVMe SSD PCIe Gen4

1TB NVMe SSD PCIe Gen4

Ports and Connectivity

1x USB Type-C 10Gbps (USB Power Delivery, DisplayPort 1.4), 3x USB Type-A 5Gbps, 1x ethernet, 1x headphone/mic combo jack, 1x HDMI 2.1, Wi-Fi 76E Bluetooth 5.4

1x USB Type-C 10Gbps (USB Power Delivery, DisplayPort 1.4), 2x USB Type-A 5Gbps, 1x ethernet, 1x headphone/mic combo jack, 1x HDMI 2.1, Wi-Fi 76E Bluetooth 5.4

Battery

70Whr

70Whr

Weight

5.35lbs / 2.425kg)

5.35lbs / 2.425kg

Dimensions

14.1 x 10.6 x 0.9 inches / 35.75 x 26.9 x 2.27 cm

14.1 x 10.6 x 0.9 inches / 35.75 x 26.9 x 2.27 cm

HP Omen 16 Slim review: Design

(Image credit: Future)

• Not actually that "Slim"
• Solid, well-built chassis
• Connectivity is only OK
• Cooling is well executed

The HP Omen 16 Slim is mostly plastic, just the bottom cover is metal. But it still feels very solid and durable. The Keyboard is nice and stable, with only a touch of flex when pushed hard. The keyboard, while we're on the subject, has four configurable RGB lighting zones, but at this price point, you're not going to get per-key lighting.

HP has done a nice job with the cooling, too. The twin fans draw air from the bottom cover and push it out the back and do so without making too much noise. However, despite the "Slim" branding, this is not a super compact laptop.

(Image credit: Future)

Coming in at 1.99cm to 2.27cm thick, where the standard Omen 16 measures between 2.39cm and 2.54cm, the 16 Slim is thinner than its sibling. But it's still not that compact.

Thanks to a rather large chine bezel and the way the rear of the chassis sticks out beyond the screen hinge, the Omen 16 Slim actually has a larger footprint than many laptops that trade on pure performance rather than portability and also tips the scales at 2.42kg. So, it's no featherweight.

In that context, the somewhat limited connectivity is a touch disappointing. You get three USB-A ports, but just one USB-C and even the latter is limited to 10Gbps, though it does at least support video out and charging the laptop itself.

HP Omen 16 Slim review: Performance

(Image credit: Future)

• Decent frame rates at 1200p with DLSS
• Seriously quick SSD
• Fan noise is reasonable

HP Omen 16 Slim benchmarks

3DMark: Night Raid: 57,311; Fire Strike: 25,198; Time Spy: 10,454; Port Royal: 6,372
Geekbench 6: Multicore: 14,468; Single-core: 3,114
Cinebench R24: Single Core: 134; Multi Core: 2,713
Crossmark: Overall: 1,992; Productivity: 1,888; Creativity: 2,182; Responsiveness: 1,783
Passmark Overall: 10,817; CPU: 38,631; 2D Graphics: 819; 3D Graphics: 17,174; Memory: 3,094; Disk: 36,232
CrystalDiskMark: Read: 7,025MB/s; Write: 5,895MB/s
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: (1200p, High): 132fps; (1200p, High, DLSS Quality): 139fps
Total War: Warhammer III: (1200p, Ultra): 83fps; (1200p, Low): 205fps
Cyberpunk 2077: (1200p, Ultra, no RT): 70fps; (1200p, RT Ultra, DLSS Balanced): 51fps
Doom: Dark Ages: (1200p, Ultra): 57fps; (1200p, Ultra, DLSS Quality): 83fps
Battery Life (TechRadar movie test): 12 hours and 32 minutes

Intel's Core Ultra 7 255H is very much a known quantity, what with its eight Performance and eight Efficient CPU cores. It's all you need for gaming in CPU terms, so the HP Omen 16 Slim's critical gaming component compared with the competition among the best gaming laptops is that Nvidia RTX 5060 GPU and how well it's been implemented.

This thinner HP Omen 16 Slim model does suffer slightly in the wattage department, with the Total Platform Power shared across the GPU, CPU, memory and more capped at 110W. But that doesn't absolutely hobble gaming performance.

For instance, running at the 16-inch display's native 1,920 by 1,200 resolution, you can crank Cyberpunk 2077 right up, with Ultra RT settings and Quality DLSS scaling and still get 44fps average frame rate.

(Image credit: Future)

OK, that's not spectacular. But it is acceptable for a single-player title. Switch off the ray tracing and you'll be looking at frame rates nearer 100. Moreover, in less demanding games, let's say something a little older like Shadow of the Tomb Raider, you can hit over 130fps even without DLSS upscaling and really make the most of the 165Hz refresh rate of the 16-inch display.

Speaking of the screen, the 16:10 aspect is a little odd and adds a little GPU load versus a vanilla 1080p panel. But it's reasonably vibrant, with nice-ish colours and contrast and decent 3ms response times. It's nothing special, but probably what you'd expect at this price point.

Just note the panel reviewed here is the upgrade 400 nit option. The base display is only 300 nits, runs at 144Hz and has much less colour fidelity. Avoid that if at all possible.

(Image credit: Future)

The 16 Slim's thermal performance is pretty impressive, too. It doesn't get too hot under load and the fan noise is reasonable. Well, it is unless you enable "Unleashed Mode" in the Omen Gaming Hub app. That cranks up the fans, but doesn't do much for frame rates.

Elsewhere, the SSD is particularly nippy, clocking over 7GB/s for reads and nearly 6GB/s for writes. For what is pitched as a value-orientated system, that's impressive. As for other elements, the sound quality from the speakers is tolerable at this price point, but the volume could be a little higher, and the webcam quality is OK.

In terms of physical performance, the chassis feels robust, even though only the bottom cover is made of metal, and the keyboard base is nice and solid with minimal flex. As for the trackpad, it's mechanical and doesn't have niceties like a glass cover. But it's large and works well enough. It's also worth noting that the memory, storage and Wi-Fi cards are all upgradeable, which is welcome in an age where too many laptops have everything soldered on.

HP Omen 16 Slim review: Battery life

(Image credit: Future)

• Surprisingly good for a budget gaming laptop
• USB-C charging is supported
• Not actually all that portable

Undoubtedly one of the HP Omen 16 Slim's more impressive aspects is battery life. OK, you're not going to get more than a couple of hours of light gaming off the mains, but for watching video, this laptop has some real legs.

Our local video playback test netted over 12 and a half hours with the screen at half brightness. That's a realistic setting for use on, say, a plane, albeit you might want to wind the screen up a little in bright daylight.

Whatever, that's a very impressive result for a gaming laptop and makes this portable much more plausible as an all-round computing device to take with you on trips and outings. The caveat to that is that the fairly large proportions and relatively hefty 2.4kg kerb weight mean this isn't a laptop you're going to sling into a small shoulder bag and forget about.

Should I buy the HP Omen 16 Slim?HP Omen 16 Slim: Scorecard

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Value

Prices are pretty variable depending on spec and location. But certain Omen 16 Slim configurations do look appealing. You may need to keep your scanners peeled for a good deal, however.

4 / 5

Design

The "Slim" branding suggests something very compact, but this is actually a fairly beefy 16-inch laptop. That said, it is solidly built with a decent keyboard. It's just a pity the connectivity isn't a touch more comprehensive.

4 / 5

Performance

This is a value-orientated gaming laptop, so expectations should be kept in check. But the RTX 5060 GPU matches well with the 16-inch display and you can run pretty much any title at high detail settings with the aid of DLSS upscaling.

3.5 / 5

Battery life

If there's one metric where the HP Omen 16 Slim delivers beyond expectations, it's battery life. You can expect over 12 hours of video playback, which is well beyond what most affordable gaming laptops can manage.

5 / 5

Total Score

Much depends on the price you can bag on the HP Omen 16 Slim. But if you can find a good deal, you'll get good performance, solid build and a nice all-round package.

4 / 5

Buy the HP Omen 16 Slim if…

You want decent value in today's weird market
Nothing's cheap when it comes to gaming PCs, these days. But the HP Omen 16 Slim is definitely decent value in the current context of spiralling memory prices.

You want good battery life
Most gaming laptops struggle away from the mains. But the HP Omen 16 Slim will do 12 hours-plus of video playback on the battery.

Don't buy it if…

You're looking for great portability
Despite the "Slim" branding, this is not a particularly compact or light 16-inch laptop. But it is solid and feels built to last.

You need cutting-edge performance
The HP Omen 16 Slim puts out decent frame rates for a mainstream laptop. But its RTX 5060 GPU is limited to 80W and this is not a high-end machine.View Deal

HP Omen 16 Slim review: Also consider

Asus V16
If you're looking for something even cheaper, try the Asus V16. It uses older Nvidia RTX 30 and 40 Series GPUs to achieve a few savings. But it's surprisingly well built and very portable for a gaming laptop. Read our full Asus V16 review.

Medion Erazer Major 16 X1
If you want more performance without breaking the bank, try the Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 and its RTX 5070 Ti GPU. It's heavy, feels and bit cheap and the battery life is poor. But it'll kick out some very impressive frame rates. Read our full Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 review.

How I tested the HP Omen 16 Slim HX

(Image credit: Future)

• Used as my daily rig for two weeks
• Threw my Steam library at
• Got forensic with the screen and build quality

I've been round the block when it comes to gaming laptops. My first portable ran a GeForce 2 Go, if you can remember back that far. My current lappie runs an RTX 4080, and there have been plenty more in between. ANd those are just my personal machines. I've long since lost count of how many gaming laptops I've reviewed. There are always a few knocking around.

Over the years, I've learned a lot about what makes a good gaming laptop and I applied that to the HP Omen 16 Slim over a couple of weeks. That means throwing everything in my Steam Library at it, from classic strategy titles like Total War to graphics fests including Cyberpunk 2077. All round performance, including the SSD, is also important, as is battery life for what is, ultimately, meant to be a portable machine.

I'm also very picky when it comes to screen quality and keyboard feel and have something of a forensic obsession with laptop build quality. You have to be realistic at this price point, but build quality is particularly important to gaming laptop longevity. Bendy chassis usually end up in flakey performance, eventually.

• First reviewed: July 2026
• Read more about how we test

A relative newcomer in the industry, DataImpulse has grabbed a slice of the proxy pie thanks to its wallet-friendly, high-performing service. From more than 90 million ethically-sourced residential IPs across 195 locations to mobile and datacenter proxies, users gain access to a speedy and reliable global network.

The company specializes in creating custom proxy services for businesses, though individual users who aim to access data from anywhere and collect the information they need will have no problem finding something for themselves.

Arguably, the biggest selling point is a highly competitive, pay-as-you-go pricing model with traffic that never expires. DataImpulse throws in free country-level targeting for every plan (more granular targeting options are also available), and full support for HTTP, HTTPS, and SOCKS5 proxy protocols across all of its proxy networks.

Plans and Pricing

DataImpulse operates on a transparent pay-as-you-go model where traffic never expires. In case you’re unfamiliar with the concept, the bandwidth you buy here is yours until your scrapers actually consume the bytes, whether that takes days or months.

The price structure is based on the type of proxy and the amount of traffic.

For instance, residential proxies start at a flat $1 per GB for a 5GB starter block, and go up to 50GB at the same dollar-to-gigabyte ratio. If you ramp up your scraping to the Advanced tier, the cost drops down to $0.80 per GB for an 800GB package, with custom enterprise pricing scaling down even further for terabyte-scale deployments - though you’ll have to pony up at least $4000 for the option.

Datacenter proxies start at a mere $0.50 per GB for new users, slipping down to $0.45 per GB when upgrading to a larger $450 volume pool. Once again, you can get a custom price per gigabyte.

Gaining access to mobile proxies kicks off at $2 per GB for the entry-level 5GB option. The price goes down to $1.6 per GB for bulk operations, with custom pricing available for truly massive projects.

Finally, premium residential proxies will set you back $5 per GB via 1GB and 10GB plans. And yes, there is a custom option too with a $20k starting point.

It’s worth mentioning that DataImpulse doesn’t play favorites with its plans. Each includes free country-level geo-targeting, rotating and sticky sessions, HTTP(S) and SOCKS5 support, full programmatic API access, 24/7 support, and unrestricted concurrent threads. There are no overage penalties or hidden connection fees, which means your infrastructure bill will match your actual code execution down to a T.

Features

If you decide to give DataImpulse a go, your first step will be to register, either the old-fashioned way or through your Google, GitHub, or LinkedIn profile. A classic dashboard layout will greet you, where all the important stuff is located in the left sidebar.

(Image credit: DataImpulse )

The usage chart and details will be your starting point. Once you settle on a plan, you can begin with the proxy configuration by setting the targeting options down to the ASN (Autonomous System Number) and IP rotation interval, which you can save altogether as a dedicated configuration.

You have to choose between a sticky or rotating proxy, as well as the protocol in charge. Sticky proxies are port-based (IP addresses are bound to a specific port for a specific timeframe), and the rotation interval can range from 1 to 120 minutes. Rotating proxies change the IP address automatically with each new request.

From here, it’s also possible to top up your balance by choosing the number of GBs you want to add in the event you need more traffic.

Here’s a more detailed look at DataImpulse’s offering:

Residential proxies

Arguably the workhorse of the platform, the standard residential proxy pool provides on-demand access to a sizable footprint of over 90 million active IP addresses across 195 countries. DataImpulse proudly markets its pool as entirely ethically sourced, which means all nodes join the network legally and transparently.

As a result, the IPs maintain a pristine reputation score and are drastically less likely to be blacklisted by major CDN platforms. In other words, when your script routes data through these nodes, target web servers view the connection as an ordinary home user browsing a site, rather than an automated bot. In our tests, residential proxies delivered a consistently high scraping success rate.

Premium residential proxies

DataImpulse labels these as ultra-responsive IP addresses with minimal latency that deliver better reliability and security compared to regular residential proxies. So, you should see faster connection speeds and more precise geo-targeting, especially considering you get full customization options to tweak your scripts.

Moreover, upgrading to the premium residential line significantly reduces the risk of encountering unexpected access blocks or sudden CAPTCHAs. Since this is a premium offering, it includes additional operational perks, such as a dedicated account manager to help optimize your efforts and resolve any doubts or issues.

Datacenter proxies

When targeting open public directories or basic landing pages (basically, anything that isn’t buffed up with sophisticated anti-bot frameworks), residential IPs can be an expensive overkill. To that extent, DataImpulse offers 20 million datacenter IPs in 195+ countries to tide you over in a cost-efficient manner.

With a response time of less than 100 milliseconds and the fact that these IPs connect directly to high-speed enterprise data systems, this tier is built for pure speed and instances where you need to process thousands of requests per second. You can also configure your IP address to be active for up to 30 minutes.

Mobile proxies

For the most challenging anti-bot systems, like social networks or review platforms, DataImpulse provides rotating and sticky mobile proxies. Pulling from a pool of over 16 million real 3G, 4G, 5G, and LTE cellular towers across 195 locations, these carry a distinct security advantage due to the same public-facing IP to thousands of mobile devices simultaneously.

Hence, web firewalls seldom block a mobile IP address outright since doing so would mean blocking hundreds of legitimate human users on that cell tower network. The largest pool of DataImpulse’s mobile IPs is in India (1.57 million), Saudi Arabia (444k), Italy (257k), Morocco (239k), while the United States is covered with 129k IPs. You can have a single address remain active for up to two hours.

Traffic that never expires

Perhaps the defining USP separating DataImpulse from a chunk of its competitors is the fact that your purchased pay-as-you-go traffic never expires.

In most cases, you’ll wind up with monthly billing subscriptions or restrictions on how long your traffic is valid for. If you have unused bandwidth, it’s gone for good. With DataImpulse, it remains completely active until your crawlers actively consume the bytes. Having peace of mind that you can use data as long as you need without worrying about losing access makes the model a great fit for small businesses and dev teams with limited budgetary and operational width.

Scraping

Unlike some of its peers, DataImpulse leans heavily into a developer-first, DIY network architecture. This means there is no web scraping API, as the vendor’s focus is solely on providing raw proxy connections, rather than managed scraping tools. You must write your own code to manage requests, parse the HTML, handle retries, and bypass CAPTCHAs.

On the plus side, such a model brings financial and structural flexibility for teams writing custom data collectors. By routing scripts through DataImpulse’s proxy layer, they can plug the proxies directly into any automation framework or headless browser engine using basic credentials or token structures.

(Image credit: DataImpulse)

In that regard, DataImpulse provides a Gateway API to programmatically manage, authenticate, and automate the provisioning of their global proxy pools. From there, you can dynamically generate proxy lists, rotate IP addresses, track bandwidth consumption and request volumes, programmatically set advanced targeting filters, and more.

There are also comprehensive integration blueprints for popular developer frameworks and third-party apps. Some of these include Scrapy, Puppeteer, Selenium, Shadowrocket, Multilogin, AdsPower, Playwright, and Zapier, to name a few. The platform also provides short code snippets for Python, Node.js, PHP, C#, Go, Ruby, and cURL to set up proxies. All of the above is neatly documented with built-in support and code examples.

Advanced geo-targeting and session controls

Country-level geo-targeting across all 195 covered regions is built natively into the base $1/GB price floor with zero add-on activation fees. For more accurate data parsing, there are State, City, ZIP code, and ASN filter toggles.

When it comes to rotating sessions, the DataImpulse gateway dynamically inserts a randomized IP address on every network request your scraper submits. For standard HTTP/HTTPS traffic, you simply point your scripts to gw.dataimpulse.com on port 823. In case your stack relies on the more robust SOCKS5 protocol to handle raw TCP tunnels or high-performance scraping, you use port 824.

For situations where your code requires session continuity (like managing a social profile or handling account-tied logins), you can bind your traffic to a dedicated port range anywhere from port 10000 through 20000. Doing so locks a single IP address to your active thread for up to 120 minutes, though the system gracefully defaults to a 30-minute window if no interval is set.

Ease of Use

There’s not much to say here. Most importantly, the dashboard allows you to move effortlessly around via a single-page command center tailored for fast deployment. That said, the arrangement of certain sections could be better.

For starters, the section ‘Resources’ that features the onboarding guide is tucked away in the upper right corner of your respective plan, instead of being the first thing you see. The same place holds the links for documentation and tutorials.

Then, the ‘Proxy Locations’ section provides a table overview of supported countries for each of the four types of proxies available on DataImpulse. There’s no additional functionality or details to it, which feels like a missed opportunity.

(Image credit: DataImpulse)

Acting as a de facto homepage, there is a filterable real-time line chart that plots your request volume across custom date ranges and breaks down traffic metrics by total requests, charged traffic, and total spend.

The dashboard also logs individual session activity in an audit table showing the timestamp, targeted host, consumed traffic, and error/success states, with the option to export this data directly to a CSV report.

In terms of generating your target connection parameters, the dashboard provides a straightforward copy-paste system where you can grab your master username and password strings.

You can also manage whitelisted IPs via a simple menu. Just save your scraping server's public IP address within your dashboard profile, and the gateway will automatically recognize your incoming traffic tunnels, thus shaving valuable milliseconds off your script's execution times.

Customer Support

One of the things DataImpulse singles out is its 24/7 personalized, human support. The company proudly mentions that you’ll get an answer in under 3 minutes, courtesy of an ever-present chat icon in the lower right corner. Our experience was no different - we got a tidy reply in less than a minute.

If you prefer self-service support, the company provides a thorough Documentation page. Here, you’ll find various technical reference materials, API endpoints, authentication methods, and basic proxy setup instructions.

(Image credit: DataImpulse)

Covering the more practical elements is the Tutorials page. It acts as an extensive step-by-step engineering handbook, packed with detailed screenshots, videos, configuration blueprints, and copy-pasteable code snippets for integrating proxies across dozens of operating systems, scraping frameworks, and headless browsers.

For customers deploying huge data operations at the custom enterprise level, DataImpulse boosts its support to include dedicated account managers and custom feature engineering tailored specifically to the customer’s unique data requirements.

The Competition

Truth be told, proxy services are tough competition. DataImpulse has robust providers like Bright Data, Oxylabs, and Decodo playing in the same field, though its unexpiring pay-as-you-go traffic and a highly disruptive $1 per GB residential proxy baseline certainly make it stand out. Nonetheless, the main problem is a lack of out-of-the-box software tools or any sort of target templates, leaving all the coding execution to your team.

Final Verdict

If anything, DataImpulse proves you don’t have to pay a premium to get access to a reliable and ethically sourced proxy network. In no small part thanks to its price tag and data that never expires, the company has created an accessible, developer-first platform that is finely tuned to the needs of individual developers, startups, dev squads, and growing small businesses.

So, if you have the know-how and are looking to drastically slash data collection costs, DataImpulse will more than suffice. But, if you’re not much of a technical user and require a fully managed, hands-off scraping solution, it will likely be too bare-bones for your liking.

• Take a look at our guide to the best proxy services

When I first caught a glimpse of The Adventures of Elliot: The Millennium Tales, it sparked a great sense of anticipation within me. After all, Square Enix and Claytechworks were collaborating to bring a brand new HD-2D RPG to the table, which appeared to combine sprinklings of classic Zelda titles with the visual, sonic, and environmental grandeur from series such as Mana and Dragon Quest.

Review info

Platform reviewed: PS5
Available on: PS5, Nintendo Switch 2, Xbox Series X and Series S, PC
Release date: June 18, 2026

I’m a huge fan of the HD-2D graphical style, and massively enjoyed recent releases such as Final Fantasy: The Ivalice Chronicles and Dragon Quest 1 & 2 HD-2D Remake, but I still wasn’t quite sure if I’d love The Adventures of Elliot. Was the action combat going to be polished and engaging enough? Was the world going to deliver the spectacle and appeal conjured up with other series? Would the narrative have me hooked?

Well, after playing the game for more than 25 hours now, I have an answer to all of those questions. Here’s what I made of The Adventures of Elliot: The Millennium Tales.

The good: combat that exceeds expectations

(Image credit: Square Enix)

Let’s start by addressing my curiosity surrounding combat in The Adventures of Elliot — just how good is it? Well, I’m pleased to report that I had a lot of fun with the action in this game. It clearly pulls on 2D Zelda, with real-time combat that challenges you to use a variety of weapons to overcome your foes.

You can equip two weapons at once, and while I typically used my sword for close range attacks and bow for projectiles, I found genuine utility in a lot of equipment, be that bombs, a hammer, spear, and more. Combat feels fluid, responsive, and well balanced. You can also defend or parry with a shield, and using this to avoid big damage can be crucial.

There’s a pretty fast, high-octane feel to battles, big or small, and by defeating multiple foes in a row, you can build up a streak to obtain better drops. This adds a layer of fun to combat, and gives you a genuine reason to seek out and destroy random creatures in your vicinity — I had a lot of fun pushing myself to get that streak as high as possible.

Combat is absolutely at its best during boss fights, though. These can offer genuine challenges, and often require you to switch up attacks, defend with care, and employ a variety of weapons to get the win. The satisfaction I got when evading a robotic titan’s assault and slashing it to smithereens with my blade was nothing short of exhilarating.

Best bit

(Image credit: Square Enix)

The highlight of this game is without question its majestic boss battles. Whether I was taking on Minister Kaifried or a bunch of deadly robotic guardians, I enjoyed making use of my full arsenal of weapons in order to emerge victorious.

What’s more, you can customize weapons with something called Magicite, which imparts specific abilities to help you wipe out the opposition with greater ease. This is executed very well, and helps you to raise attack power, unlock elemental attacks, and extend the reach of your attacks, for instance.

By spending more Tul (the in-universe currency), you can use more Magicite, and this helps you scale in terms of power as the game unfolds, making progression feel natural and well-paced.

Other gameplay elements are solid too. Platforming isn’t a massive part of the game, but feels precise and smooth. Your companion for most of the journey, Faie, also has abilities such as dashing and warping, which make traversing environments and taking down enemies even more varied and seamless, and you can unlock more of — and improve on — said abilities as the game progresses.

The not-so good: a narrative missing its spark

(Image credit: Square Enix)

So, the gameplay in The Adventures of Elliot is a hit, in my book. The brilliant bosses and close contests against frogs, robots, slugs, and more kept me coming back for more. But unfortunately, some things made me feel reluctant to indulge in long, uninterrupted play sessions — namely, the game’s narrative and dialogue.

Simply put, the story in The Adventures of Elliot lacks the spark that I was looking for. It often feels flat, lacking moments of surprise and suspense, and its largely predictable plot points paired with sluggish and dull dialogue meant that I was tempted, at times, to skip through a few scenes — something I never do with story-driven RPGs.

On top of this, the cast of characters is surprisingly weak for a Square Enix game. The protagonist, Elliot, feels somewhat hollow, and spends much of the game telling people to follow their heart, chase their dreams, and to believe in themselves. To be blunt, it feels a bit sappy, and despite his striking appearance, he’s actually quite an uninteresting lead.

(Image credit: Square Enix)

A lot of the other characters are written in a slightly wooden way, too. Elliot will meet them, they’ll reveal something that troubles them — be that isolation, missing a loved one, or seeking connection with others — the hero will do something to assist them, and then you move on. As a result, characters often lack nuance or depth, and it feels hard to care about the various individuals involved.

Like a lot of other players have pointed out online, your companion, Faie, is also rather irritating. She speaks up…a lot…and her hand-holdy, pointless interjections can feel grating. You can mute your companion, thankfully, which is a good thing given that the fairy’s high-pitched tone is still haunting me.

Much of the game is centered around time travel, another element that could’ve been handled more effectively in my view. A lot of the environments look identical across different eras, and enemy variety can be pretty limited across time as well.

I did like the discoveries you could make across different ages, though, and hunting for new weapons in the various dungeons, and general exploration, was pretty enjoyable. My critique here, however, is that the puzzles within various areas are very easy, and require little effort to overcome. Therefore, anyone seeking out the ingenious design of classic Zelda dungeons may be left wanting more.

Final thoughts: a new IP with growing pains

(Image credit: Square Enix)

The Adventures of Elliot still nails a lot of the fundamentals, with a beautiful soundtrack, gorgeous HD-2D visuals, and a neat UI. But when I look at the full package, I’m left feeling conflicted.

While the combat is slick and enticing, the underwhelming story and lack of variation in environments and enemies slightly disappointed me.

Although I still had a decent time with The Adventures of Elliot, and I enjoyed its delicious HD-2D graphics and high-octane battles, it’s clear that the new IP has gone through a few growing pains. And unfortunately, its forgettable characters and lacking dialogue bring the overall experience down a touch, meaning it doesn’t quite hit the highest of heights.

Should you play The Adventures of Elliot: The Millennium Tales?

(Image credit: Square Enix)Play it if...

You love classic Zelda combat
If you’re a sucker for combat in 2D Zelda games, then this title will surely hit the spot for you. The pace of battle and numerous weapon types keep combat feeling varied and exciting throughout the game’s runtime.

You’re a fan of the HD-2D visual style
If, like me, you’ve enjoyed the HD-2D visual style before, you'll almost certainly love it again here. The game is full of beautiful backdrops and environments, and the expressive 16-bit style sprites really pop.

Don't play it if...

You’re expecting a gripping story
The biggest weakness of this title is its underwhelming story, with dull dialogue and an uninspired cast of characters holding the overall experience back from greatness.

You want tough puzzles
Although in-game dungeons hold some highly entertaining boss fights, reaching them can often feel like a formality. That’s largely because puzzles are very straightforward, with little challenge involved.

Accessibility features

There are a number of ways to customize the experience in The Adventures of Elliot: The Millennium Tales. There are a handful of text languages, and you can swap between English or Japanese voices. You can alter text display speed, and set dialogue to auto if you want to watch scenes unfurl naturally.

There are a range of difficulty modes too, and you can remap controls to your liking for a more custom experience. Unfortunately, there’s no colorblind mode, or similar.

(Image credit: Square Enix)How I reviewed Dragon Quest I & II HD-2D Remake

(Image credit: Square Enix)

I spent more than 25 hours playing through the main story and side quests in The Adventures of Elliot: The Millennium Tales. I played on Normal difficulty in this instance.

For the most part, I played the game on my PS5, which is connected up to my Sky Glass Gen 2 TV and Marshall Heston 120 soundbar. However, I occasionally dipped into the title on my PS Portal, and used the Sennheiser CX 80U to enjoy in-game audio while on the go.

More generally, I’ve reviewed a wide range of games here at TechRadar, though my main focus has been on RPGs, including Square Enix titles like Final Fantasy: The Ivalice Chronicles and Dragon Quest 1 & 2 HD-2D Remake.

First reviewed: July 2026

Honor Magic V6 review: Two-minute review

Chinese phone giant Honor has been on a bit of a roll recently. In 2026, it’s already given us the exceptional Honor MagicPad 4 and the compelling Honor Magic 8 Pro flagship, not to mention the impressive (albeit slightly pricey) Honor 600 Pro. Its latest foldable, the Honor Magic V6, keeps up this formidable streak and is easily worthy of being considered one of the best foldable phones today.

The big draw here is the Magic V6's market-leading durability. I’ve taken plenty of foldables for a spin, from the clamshell Motorola Razr Plus to the tablet-style Oppo Find N5, but I’ve always maintained that I would never actually buy one. Why? Because these devices are often simply too fragile. I’m pretty clumsy with my phones and regularly use (and I must admit, sometimes drop) them in the shower or bath, and there’s no way that I’m going to splash out on a premium foldable only to see it turned into a damp paperweight.

The Honor Magic V6 is the first foldable I’ve tested that truly bucks that trend.

(Image credit: Future)

In its review documentation, Honor recommended not to baby the phone — I was encouraged to take it out and about without a case, use it in the rain, and so on. I’ve been doing exactly that and, after multiple months of use, it still looks brand new. With its IP68 and IP69 ratings, it offers the highest level of water protection that I can find on the market right now, comparable to most regular high-end flagships.

Its fold is smooth, quiet, and, after being unfolded multiple times a day for weeks, is still as good as new. Honor says that the inner screen is layered with tough UTG flexible glass and has an SGS Imperceptible Crease Certification, and it really shows. The fold is near-invisible head-on, and only really shows if you hold the phone at very specific angles. This is the first foldable I’ve used where you can truly forget that it’s even there.

All of this is underpinned by a premium design that’s impressively slim. The folded phone is about as thick as an iPhone 17 Pro Max, so it feels great in the hands. Unfolded, it becomes just 4.00mm — the same incredible slimness that we loved with the previous Honor Magic V5. On that note, it’s a shame that Honor hasn’t really changed the design that much for this new iteration, though.

The look is practically identical and, on a more serious note, the V5 often ran hot, and that’s still an issue this time around. It’s especially apparent when you’re putting the top-end Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 SoC through its paces, so be prepared for some thermal throttling if you’re spending hours in the most demanding games.

Despite these minor shortcomings, the Magic V6 is a winner and another impressive showing for Honor. I’m eager to see what the company has planned next.

Honor Magic V6 review: Price and availability

• Priced at £1,999.99 / AU$2,999 (around $2,700)
• Already discounted by £500 thanks to a voucher
• Available in the UK and Australia, but not the US

The Honor Magic V6 is priced at £1,999.99 (AU$2,999), which is a pretty hefty sum, but roughly in line with competing devices like the $2,099.99 / £1,899 / AU$2,999 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra.

Honor gains a major edge when you consider that the V6 offers 512GB of storage as standard (the Z Fold 8 Ultra starts at just 256GB) and factor in the brand’s frequent promotions and freebies.

At the time of writing, for example, the phone is already £500 off on the official Honor website thanks to a voucher, and comes bundled with your choice of an Honor Pad 10 tablet, projector, or AI voice recorder in addition to some earbuds — you can’t really argue with the value there.

• Value score: 4 / 5

Honor Magic V6 review: Specs

Here's a look at the Honor Magic V6's spec sheet:

Dimensions

156.7mm x 74.5 mm x 8.75mm (folded) / 156.7mm x 145.6mm x 4.1mm (unfolded)

Weight

219g

Screen

Inner: 7.95-inch 2352 x 2172 foldable OLED

Outer: 6.52-inch 2420 x 1080 OLED

Chipset

Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

RAM

16GB

Storage

512GB

OS

Honor MagicOS 10 (Android 16)

Rear cameras

50MP ultra-wide, 50MP wide, 64MP telephoto lens (3x zoom)

Front camera

20MP wide, 20MP wide

Audio

Stereo speakers with Honor Sound

Battery

6,660mAh lithium polymer

Charging

80W Honor SuperCharge, 66W Wireless Honor SuperCharge

Colors

Red, Gold, White, Black

Honor Magic V6 review: Design

(Image credit: Future)

• Very similar to the V5
• Smoother, more premium hinge
• Still a large camera bump

The design of the Honor Magic V6 is practically identical to that of the V5. It is incredibly thin when unfolded, coming in at just 4.1mm, with a durable aluminium chassis. The back material depends on your choice of colorway, with the Red version using vegan leather and the Gold, Black, and White featuring a smooth fibre composite.

Whether you’re using it folded or unfolded, this is a very good-looking phone that feels great in the hands. I took it with me to Los Angeles on two business trips during my testing, and multiple people complimented the device completely unprompted and were eager to learn more about it — something that I can’t say has happened with any other mobile I’ve used.

Like most Chinese flagships, the rear of the phone features a large octagonal camera bump which isn't going to be to everyone’s taste. I do quite like how it looks, though, and appreciate the subtle tactile texture on the ring around it. The bump is also a bit smaller than that of the Honor Magic 8 Pro, which means that it’s less likely to rest under your fingers and get covered in smudges.

Although the aesthetic hasn’t changed, there have been some big improvements compared to the Honor Magic V5 when it comes to the hinge. It’s much quieter and smoother this time around, helping the phone feel more premium and sturdy. When opened, the phone’s inner display looks totally flat, and the crease is totally invisible in most situations. It only shows up at specific angles and when the screen is displaying lighter colors like grey or white.

Honor keeps things refreshingly simple when it comes to buttons with the Magic V6. There’s a small volume rocker and a power button on the right-hand side, and that’s your lot. They’re well placed for one-handed operation and feel pleasantly clicky. My only real gripe is the fingerprint reader built into the power button, which sometimes feels unresponsive and requires a few attempts to successfully unlock.

• Design score: 4.5 / 5

Honor Magic V6 review: Display

(Image credit: Future)

• Both screens are bright and attractive
• Crease is barely visible
• Comes with pre-applied screen protectors

Both of the displays found on the Honor Magic V6 are excellent. The 6.52-inch OLED outer screen has a 2420 x 1080 resolution, with a fantastic 2,000 nits peak brightness (or up to an absurd 6,000 nits with HDR) that ensures that it stays visible in even the harshest lighting conditions. It uses Honor’s Anti-scratch NanoCrystal Shield coating, which is decently scratch-resistant and has managed to keep the screen pristine throughout my testing.

It certainly helps that the outer screen also comes fitted with a screen protector out of the box, though I opted to remove it early on as it picked up a lot of marks very quickly. (The inner display also comes with a screen protector, though be warned that this is an integral part of the display that should not be removed by the user. It thankfully seems much more durable than the outer one). Despite the rectangular candy-bar shape of the folded phone, the outer screen uses rounded corners, presumably to give it symmetry with the inner one.

That inner display is a 7.5-inch foldable OLED panel, surrounded by impressively thin plastic bezels. It’s almost as bright as the external one, with a 1,300-nit peak brightness (or up to 5,000 nits with HDR). It’s decently high resolution at 2352 x 2172 and doesn’t look noticeably less sharp than the external one in use, so you can transition between them seamlessly. Honor also deserves some credit for just how closely calibrated both of the displays are: they’re practically identical in terms of color and together just feel like a natural extension of the same panel.

Both the inner and outer screens feature an adaptive 120Hz refresh rate, too (avoiding a jarring transition between different refresh rates when switching between the two), which is fantastic for smoothly scrolling apps and social media websites.

Lastly, you absolutely don’t need to worry about an ugly crease spoiling your view with the Honor Magic V6. There is still a fold that you can feel if you really examine it with your fingers, but it’s practically invisible in regular use unless you hold your phone at specific side-on angles or look very closely on a totally blank screen.

I’ve been folding and unfolding the phone constantly throughout my testing, and it hasn’t become more visible either, which is a great sign for long-term durability.

• Display score: 4 / 5

Honor Magic V6 review: Cameras

(Image credit: Future)

• Good camera setup
• Not quite as strong as the Magic 8 Pro
• Plenty of software features

The cameras of the Honor Magic V6 aren’t quite as strong as those of the Honor Magic 8 Pro, but they’re still very capable compared to the rest of the wider foldable category. The rear camera offers a three-lens setup, with a 50MP ultra-wide, 50MP wide, and 64MP telephoto lens.

Photos are bright and poppy by default, which is great for capturing the mood of summer days, and they offer a good level of detail — even when dealing with busy scenes and foliage. The main sensor offers 3x optical zoom, which works fantastically, alongside a much less consistent 100x digital zoom. This setup performs well in low-light conditions and those with challenging lighting setups, like concerts with bright strobe effects.

There are plenty of software features to try out on the Magic V6, including AI-powered color filters and different photo watermarks. The ability to display the photo that you’re taking on the front screen is also brilliant for group settings.

Both the front and inner display have the same 20MP wide sensor, which does a good job with selfies, even if the results are a little overprocessed. The Honor Magic V6 also has strong video shooting capabilities and can capture 4K video at 60fps.

As good as it all is, though, I do think the results are overall less impressive than the images I’ve taken with the Honor Magic 8 Pro and its 200MP main lens.

• Cameras score: 4 / 5

Honor Magic V6 review: Camera samplesDashiell WoodDashiell WoodDashiell WoodDashiell WoodDashiell WoodDashiell WoodDashiell WoodHonor Magic V6 review: Performance

(Image credit: Future)

• Flagship chip
• Can run hot
• Good RAM and storage

The Honor Magic V6 is powered by the flagship Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, the same chip found in the Honor Magic 8 Pro, Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, Xiaomi 17 Ultra, and other high–end smartphones. With this SoC, it should come as no surprise that the performance of the Honor Magic V6 is incredibly strong across the board.

In daily use, you’re not going to notice any hitches or slowdown when navigating system menus, browsers like Google Chrome or Firefox, and social media apps. It’s paired with 16GB of RAM, which is more than enough for serious multitasking. I normally rely on my phone for productivity tasks like note-taking, transcribing, and document editing while I’m out on business trips, and my flow was never broken by sudden reloads when flicking between multiple apps — even ones that I hadn’t opened for some time.

Gaming performance is also excellent. It almost goes without saying that casual titles like Plants vs Zombies 3 or Warhammer Combat Cards - 40K (two games I must admit I’ve been spending an embarrassing amount of time playing recently) are totally flawless. More demanding titles, like my go-to Zenless Zone Zero, will run beautifully at the maximum settings preset as well.

The Honor Magic V6 does have a problem with temperatures, though. Extended gaming sessions will cause the phone to heat up quite a bit, leading to eventual slowdown. I also found that it struggled massively during the recent UK heatwave, feeling red hot in my pocket and struggling to run even Google Maps smoothly in direct sunlight. Given the phone’s thinness, I think it’s reasonable that it runs hot at times — but if you want a dedicated gaming device, you would be better off looking outside the foldable market.

Only one configuration of the Honor Magic V6 is available, offering 512GB of storage out of the box. It’s a bit of a shame that there’s no 1TB model for proper power users, but this 512GB capacity will be more than sufficient for the vast majority of buyers. I still have almost 300GB of free space after multiple months of use.

The stereo speakers of the Honor Magic V6 are decent, but hardly going to blow your socks off. There’s more bass than you might expect given the phone’s slight profile, and they can get fairly loud. Just make sure that you run to the ‘Sound quality and effects’ menu in the settings app and disable the various effects that are, for some reason, enabled by default. They just make everything sound washed out.

• Performance score: 4 / 5

Honor Magic V6 review: Software

(Image credit: Future)

• Transitions between screens seamlessly
• MagicOS 10 is still a winner
• Sleek, iOS-inspired design language

I’m a big fan of MagicOS 10, Honor’s Android 16-based operating system. The design is certainly Apple-inspired, but as an ex-iPhone user, I find it both visually appealing and easy to use. It has a liquid-glass-like aesthetic, with sleek, semi-transparent menus and rounded buttons.

You get all the visual flair of using an iPhone, but with all the additional customization options that you would expect from the Android ecosystem. New icon packs, themes, and a range of pre-set options can be selected from the in-built themes app. You can even disable the transparency effects throughout the OS if you want something that looks a bit more like traditional Android.

Smart features, like an AI tool to recommend images that would be well-suited for your lock screen and AI-powered widgets that use context to suggest the app that you’re most likely to want to use, make daily operation smooth.

Other AI software elements include the ability to generate or rephrase text and a surprisingly good translation feature. They’re not all winners though. The AI Settings Agent (which allows you to type or speak sentences like ‘Turn off Bluetooth’ in order to change key settings) is laughably useless, while the so-called AI Memories App is literally just a screenshot tool with the word AI slapped on it.

But compared to other foldables that I have used, the Honor Magic V6 is by far the smoothest when transitioning between the two displays on the software front. You will get the odd moment where things freeze up, or apps fail to resize properly, but the vast majority of the time it works exactly as you would expect. I soon found that being able to seamlessly access the larger screen made it much easier to compose apps in Gmail, or edit documents in Google Drive.

• Software score: 4 / 5

Honor Magic V6 review: Battery

(Image credit: Future)

• 6,660mAh lithium polymer cell
• Best in class battery life
• Easily lasts for more than a day

The battery life of the Honor Magic V6 is superb. The 6,660mAh lithium polymer cell offers more than enough juice for a full day of use, even if you play graphically demanding games or stream video content. I use my phone constantly throughout the day and regularly go to bed with about 25% of juice left. With light use, you could easily stretch multiple days out of a single charge, particularly if you enable one of the power-saving modes.

6,660mAh is the largest battery capacity you will find across the entire foldable category, and it shows in real-world use. The Honor Magic V6 can comfortably outlast both the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (we’re yet to test it against the new Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra), as well as traditional flagships like the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra.

Honor devices are already known for their serious battery chops, but cramming this much battery life into a device so thin and light is extremely impressive.

• Battery score: 5 / 5

Should you buy the Honor Magic V6?Honor Magic V6 scorecard

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Value

The Honor Magic V6 isn’t cheap, but it does offer significantly better value than key competitors.

4/5

Design

A sleek, stylish, and durable design with a smooth hinge. It’s great, but draws heavily on the winning formula of the Honor Magic V5.

4.5/5

Display

The Honor Magic V6 offers two great screens which feel like a natural extension of each other.

4/5

Software

Honor MagicOS 10 is a capable and attractive operating system that’s well optimized for foldables.

4/5

Camera

A compelling camera setup, only lagging slightly behind regular flagships.

4/5

Performance

Extremely fast and ready for gaming, but prone to overheating during extended play sessions.

4/5

Battery

The Honor Magic V6 excels with leading battery life in the foldable category

5/5

Buy it if...

You want a foldable with serious battery chops
The Honor Magic V6 offers the best battery life in the entire foldable category. It’s the one to choose if you need serious battery performance.

You want a great-looking phone
The Honor Magic V6 doesn’t stray too far from the design of the Honor Magic V5, but that’s not necessarily a bad thing. It’s still a fantastic-looking phone.

You need a durable foldable
The Honor Magic V6 is incredibly durable for a foldable phone. It has some of the best water resistance on the market, and feels sturdy enough to last for years.

Don't buy it if...

You are a hardcore gamer
The Honor Magic V6 has the technical specs for high-level gaming, but it often runs hot under heavy load, which does hamper performance. Consider a conventional flagship or a dedicated gaming phone if you want to play the latest and greatest titles for hours at a time.

Honor Magic V6 review: Also consider

Not so keen on the Honor Magic V6? Here are two alternatives to weigh up, one folding and one not.

Honor Magic 8 Pro
The Honor Magic 8 Pro is a fantastic alternative if you want a conventional flagship with similar specs in a non-folding format. It’s cheaper, but features a larger battery, better cameras, better cameras and faster charging among other upgrades.

Read our full Honor Magic 8 Pro review

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
The Google Pixel 10 Fold also offers a strong level of water resistance and durability. It’s the alternative to go for if you would prefer something running a more vanilla version of Android.

Read our full Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold review

Honor Magic V6

Honor Magic 8 Pro

Google Pixel 10 Fold

Starting price

£1,999.99 / AU$2,999 (around $2,700)

£1099.99

$1,799 / £1,749 / AU $2,699

Dimensions

156.7mm x 74.5 mm x 8.75mm (folded) / 156.7mm x 145.6mm x 4.1mm (unfolded)

161.15 x 8.4 x 75mm

155.2 x 150.4 x 5.2 mm

Weight

219g

219g

258g

Screen

Inner: 7.95-inch 2352 x 2172 foldable OLED

Outer: 6.52-inch 2420 x 1080 OLED

6.7-inch 1256 x 2808 OLED, 120Hz

Inner: 6.4-inch OLED

Outer: 8-inch OLED

Chipset

Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

Google Tensor G5

RAM

16GB

12GB

16GB

Storage

512GB

512GB

256GB / 512GB / 1TB

OS

Honor MagicOS 10 (Android 16)

MagicOS 10, based on Android 16

Android 16

Rear cameras

50MP ultra-wide, 50MP wide, 64MP telephoto lens (3x zoom)

50MP main + 50MP ultra-wide + 200MP telephoto (3.7x zom)

48MP, f/1.7, 0.5-inch sensor

Front camera

20MP wide, 20MP wide

50MP

10MP

Audio

Stereo speakers with Honor Sound

Stereo speakers with Honor Surround Subwoofer

Stereo with spatial audio

Battery

6,660mAh lithium polymer

7,100mAh (tested), 6270mAh (EU)

Up to 30 hours

Charging

80W Honor SuperCharge, 66W Wireless Honor SuperCharge

120W wired, 80W wireless

39W wired charging, 15W wireless

Colors

Red, Gold, White, Black

Sunrise Gold, Sky Cyan, Black

Moonstone, Jade

How I tested the Honor Magic V6

• Tested for multiple months
• Used as a daily driver
• Compared to flagship devices

I tested the Honor Magic V6 over a period of multiple months, using it as my daily driver. I relied on it for a wide range of tasks, from listening to music and browsing social media on my commute to watching my favorite series on a plane and trying out the latest game releases.

Throughout my time with the phone, I frequently compared its performance to other flagship devices, including those from Honor and its major competitors.

Read more about how we test

First reviewed July 2026

TP-Link Tapo C660 Kit: One-minute review

The TP-Link Tapo C660 Kit is a feature-packed 4K outdoor security camera that delivers many of the perks usually reserved for pricier models, including solar charging, pan-and-tilt coverage, color night vision and local microSD storage.

That last feature means you won’t need to pay for a subscription for video playback and download, but there are still some great (but non-essential) features in the paid Tapocare subscription, especially if you plan to expand your home's security with more than a single camera.

The Tapo app is also easy to use, and the C660 Kit will slot in alongside other Tapo smart home gear like lights, plugs and more to form its own smart home ecosystem. On the other hand, if you have other smart devices in the mix and would prefer a hub to control them all, Alexa has the strongest support, while Google Home only works with voice commands and video streaming to smart displays and TVs. There’s no native support for Apple HomeKit.

While it doesn't necessarily stand out in a crowded market with its design, the white casing looks sleek and stylish, and the IP65 waterproof rating means the C660 Kit is dust-tight and can withstand low-pressure water jets from any direction (aka rain, splashes or hose spray).

(Image credit: Future | Nico Arboleda)TP-Link Tapo C660 Kit review: Price and availability

• Starts at $169.99 / £179.99 / AU$299 for a single camera unit
• Available in multipacks of 2, 3 and 4-camera bundles
• Optional Tapocare subscription plans start at $3.49 / £2.99 / AU$3.99 per month

The Tapo C660 Kit costs $169.99 / £179.99 / AU$299 for a single camera unit, although multipacks of 2-, 3- and 4-camera kits are available either as set bundles or as part of a build-your-own package option directly from Tapo as well as through third-party retailers like Amazon.

While you may not need a subscription package, especially if you use a single camera unit, Tapocare might well be worthwhile for some users. It offers cloud storage, extended video clip history for up to 30 days and enhanced notifications, with plans starting at $3.49 / £2.99 / AU$3.99 per month for one camera on the Basic Tapocare tier. Prices increase as you add more cameras.

You can also buy the camera on its own without the solar panel under the TP-Link Tapo C560WS name for $99.99 / £109.99 / AU$199.

• Value: 5/5

TP-Link Tapo C660 Kit review: Specs

Price

$169.99 / £179.99 / AU$299

Megapixels

8MP

Resolution

4K / 3840 x 2160 pixels

Field of view

105º

Pan/tilt

360º horizontal rotation, 90º vertical

Storage

microSD up to 512GB (not included)

Smart home

Alexa, Google Home, Siri Shortcuts; no HomeKit

Battery

10,000mAh

Connectivity

2.4GHz / 5GHz Wi-Fi 4

IP Rating

IP65

TP-Link Tapo C660 Kit review: Design and installation

• Sleek black and white color scheme
• Straightforward installation with easy-to-follow instructions
• Recommended mounting height is between 2.5m and 3m (8-10 feet)

The Tapo C660 Kit has a sleek white plastic body with black accents around the lens, with IP65 rating for dust ingress protection and resistance to low-pressure water jets from any direction. This means water from rain, splashes or hose spray will be fine, but it won’t withstand immersion and pressure washing.

The solar panel is just the right size relative to the camera — it isn’t small and subtle by any means and it’s definitely noticeable once installed, but it isn’t too imposing either. As mentioned above, there is a rubber flap underneath the camera lens concealing the power button, a reset button and a microSD card slot.

Installing the Tapo C660 Kit is straightforward thanks to the easy-to-follow instructions included in the box. You start by drilling holes where you want to mount the base plate, then slot the camera in. The solar panel is screwed on top, then plugged into the camera’s USB-C port located on the bottom.

(Image credit: Future | Nico Arboleda)

It’s worth taking some time to think about where you want the camera placed before you install it, though. While the Tapo C660 Kit can pan and tilt the camera, getting the full view of an entire space isn’t guaranteed if it’s mounted too low since it doesn’t tilt upward. TP-Link recommends mounting it between 2.5m and 3m (8-10 feet) and in a location where the solar panel gets the most sunlight throughout the year.

TP-Link also recommends that the camera shouldn’t point at swaying trees and other moving objects like vehicles and pedestrians to prevent an avalanche of notifications, but if it’s unavoidable, the C660 lets you set motion detection zones via the app to reduce or minimize notifications of movement within those zones.

(Image credit: Future | Nico Arboleda)

One thing to note about the installation is that the camera has a manual power button tucked away beneath a flap under the lens. Unlike other security cameras that power up automatically when plugged into a power source (like the solar panel or a USB-C cable), this button needs to be switched on before mounting (especially when it's in a hard-to-reach height) and pairing with the Tapo app.

Pairing the camera to the app is quick and straightforward, with only a few setup options at the beginning, like Wi-Fi connection type (2.4GHz for longer range or 5GHz for better video streaming quality, both using the Wi-Fi 4 standard), assigning the camera’s location and even the icon you want displayed in the Tapo app home screen.

• Design: 5/5

TP-Link Tapo C660 Kit review: Software and smart home support

• Tapo app is intuitive and easy to use
• Alexa has full support, while Google Home is limited
• Motion detection zones move with the camera instead of a fixed area

TP-Link’s Tapo C660 Kit natively integrates with the Tapo smart home app, allowing the camera to slot into any existing Tapo smart home ecosystem that might include lights, plugs, switches, robot vacuums, door locks and more.

If you have devices from other brands and use a smart assistant to consolidate them into one interface, the camera supports Amazon Alexa and Google Home. Alexa supports both live footage playback and voice commands, while Google Home only supports voice controls and video streaming on select devices. Apple HomeKit isn’t supported, but alerts and automations can still be done through Siri via iOS shortcuts enabled through the Tapo app.

(Image credit: Future | Nico Arboleda)

The app works well, with an intuitive interface using tiles to show all your Tapo devices, with dedicated tabs for the different gadget categories (like cameras, vacuums and 'Smart' for automations). You can play the live feed and adjust settings by tapping on the tile for the camera (or cameras if you have more).

Camera settings include two-way audio, a toggle for the built-in spotlight and adjustments for panning and tilting the camera. There’s also an option to 'save' a set camera position via 'Viewpoints' and easily access those positions without manually adjusting each time. Those views can be used for automations, too.

To try out the feature, I set the camera to monitor the rear of the house instead of the driveway and front stairs for just a few hours during the day, and it would activate as scheduled each time. Patrol Mode also lets you move the camera between those set positions, but the Tapo app warns that this mode may impact the camera motor’s longevity.

(Image credit: Future | Nico Arboleda)

One annoyance I found with the Viewpoints feature was that the motion detection zone that I set also moved with the camera and there’s no option to lock it to a specific spot. Thankfully, I didn’t have to move my camera too often for that to personally impact me, but I can see it being inconvenient for some users.

Adding to the motion tracking is a setting subject detection like person, pet or vehicle, and it can also be set for different motion detection zones as well.

• Software: 4/5

TP-Link Tapo C660 Kit review: Performance

• Crisp 4K image quality from 8MP lens
• Built-in spotlight provides color at night
• Solar panel keeps the unit running 24/7

The Tapo C660 Kit captures videos through its 8MP lens with 4K (3840 x 2160 pixels) resolution, with a frame rate of 15 or 20 frames per second. The recorded video clips were crisp and detailed when viewing live or when playing back previously recorded footage. It was clear enough for me to see details like faces, vehicle license plates and larger text from further away, while the 18x digital zoom provided more detail than lower-resolution cameras.

It managed to retain detail in brighter areas and the video wasn’t washed out, like when direct sunlight was hitting the driveway. There’s built-in wide dynamic range to prevent overexposure in bright sunlight or underexposure in dark shadows.

Motion tracking was responsive, and the C660 Kit could track me moving when I was walking quickly, running or cycling (although I wouldn’t necessarily call myself a fast runner or cyclist to try and avoid the tracking). I also liked that the camera automatically reverts to the original position after detecting movement, so I didn’t have to adjust it manually as some security cameras require you to do.

At night, the f/1.6 aperture takes in enough light to provide a clear image, and the built-in spotlight adds more low-light visibility. There’s also an infrared sensor as an alternative to color night vision. While I found both modes were able to detect movement almost instantly, the image quality isn’t as crisp as daytime mode, but it was still decent enough to be clear and fully visible.

The built-in microphone produced clear audio and was loud enough for a conversation even when I wasn't at home.

(Image credit: Future | Nico Arboleda)

The solar panel kept the battery topped up, with the camera almost always running at 100% apart from some overcast days. It was only when I switched on 24/7 Capture (which frankly most people won’t need) that the solar panel struggled to keep the camera charged, and I eventually had to bring it indoors (it can be removed from its base plate easily) for a top-up via a USB-C cable.

In a different test, I tried running the camera without the solar panel plugged in, and the camera ran uninterrupted for just over 2 weeks before it needed charging.

(Image credit: Future | Nico Arboleda)

The Tapo C660 Kit isn't necessarily the cheapest 4K security camera, but having local storage via a microSD card makes it a great value option compared to others that require a subscription to access cloud storage for recorded footage. It supports up to 512GB, though you'll need to purchase the microSD card separately as it doesn't come with one in the box.

TP-Link says that’s enough for around 16 complete days of recording, which is plenty for most people. Local storage means you can also back up those recordings to your home computer or another drive for redundancy. The Tapo app also lets you password-protect the microSD card for an extra layer of security.

Accessing footage from the card is easy through the app, and notifications reliably link to recordings with almost no delay after the camera detects motion. Video playback is also very smooth in the app. If you prefer cloud storage, you can opt for the aforementioned Tapocare subscription and choose a plan based on the number of connected cameras you plan to have.

Other features in Tapocare include 30 days of encrypted video storage for events, rich notifications and video summaries.

• Performance: 4/5

Should I buy the TP-Link Tapo C660 Kit?TP-Link Tapo C660 Kit report card

Attribute

Notes

Score

Value

You get some premium features like 4K resolution and 360º views for an affordable price, while on-device storage means you don’t have to pay for a subscription.

5/5

Design

It features a clean, sleek white design that’s relatively sturdy, and the solar panel that helps to extend its battery life is a proportionate fit.

5/5

Software

The Tapo app is clean and intuitive, with plenty of adjustments to fine-tune the settings. Alexa has the strongest support for smart home integrations, with Google Home at a distant second.

4/5

Performance

It captures crisp 4K footage well, and also performs reasonably well in low-light situations thanks to a built-in spotlight.

4/5

Buy it if

You need to cover a large area

With a field of view up to 105º and 360º horizontal rotation, a single camera can cover a building’s full side, although you'll need multiple units if you want even better coverage.

You don’t want to recharge a security camera frequently

When placed in a sunny spot, the solar panel will keep the camera running long enough for infrequent charging, but it can even be further optimized with the right settings.

You don’t want to pay for a subscription

On-device storage via a microSD card means most of the essential functions aren’t locked behind a paywall.

Don't buy it if

You live somewhere that doesn’t get much sun

A wired security camera may be more suitable if you don’t get enough sunlight to benefit from the included solar panel.

You want better smart home integration

Alexa has the strongest support, but the camera doesn’t support live footage with Google Home, while Apple HomeKit is not supported at all.

How I tested the TP-Link Tapo C660 Kit

I installed the Tapo C660 Kit to a porch post on my property for a few months to get a sense of both its recording capabilities and whether its solar panel would keep the camera’s battery charged.

I tested all the settings, but had the alarm and spotlight mostly turned off to avoid disturbing neighbors, only doing one-off tests to see if they perform as advertized. I would also check captured footage whenever I got a push notification.

The smart home integrations were tested with smart displays (a 2nd-gen Google Nest Hub and an Amazon Echo Show 5) in addition to the Alexa and Google Home mobile apps.

First reviewed July 2026

GameSir G8+ Bluetooth: One-minute review

The GameSir G8+ Bluetooth is the wireless mobile controller in the G8 family and bolsters compatibility from being simply mobile, to the Nintendo Switch, tablets, and PC. The same full-size grips, Hall effect joysticks and triggers, and programmable back buttons that made the wired versions of the G8 so impressive remain, and at $79.99 / £79.99 / AU$129, so does the price.

On paper, you’d think it’s a no-brainer to go wireless, particularly with the addition of a six-axis gyroscope adding to that strong core experience, but the wireless freedom you gain comes with meaningful trade-offs. Noticeably, the lack of passthrough charging and the lack of a headphone jack, both obvious casualties of the move to Bluetooth.

More importantly for iPhone gamers, the GameSir iOS app doesn't recognize the controller, which means the stick calibration, dead zone tuning, hair-trigger configuration, and back button mapping that make the G8 Plus so compelling as an option on other platforms go completely to waste. The Bluetooth connection itself also feels less locked-in than the wired experience on iPhone, with small stick movements occasionally getting lost along the way.

On Android and PC, the experience is significantly better. The app works, the back buttons are configurable, and there’s haptic feedback on offer as well (albeit with patchy support, particularly on mobile). For the first time, you can even use the G8 Plus with your Nintendo Switch. But if an iPhone is your primary device, the wired GameSir G8+ MFi delivers a more complete, more reliable experience for the same money.

(Image credit: Future)GameSir G8+ Bluetooth: Price and availability

• List price: $79.99 / £79.99 / AU$129
• Available from GameSir and major retailers
• Same price as the rest of the G8 range

The middle sibling, the GameSir G8+ Bluetooth launched in mid-2024 at $79.99 / £79.99 / AU$129, matching the rest of the G8 family.

Each variant has pros and cons, so the consistent price puts the onus firmly on the buyer to decide which set of trade-offs works best for their setup. GameSir has also released a couple of special edition color variants in some regions, including a Hulk and a Thanos Edition, which will set you back slightly more.

At this price, it remains highly competitive against the Backbone One 2nd Gen and is significantly cheaper than the Razer Kishi Ultra, though the Bluetooth limitations on iPhone mean it's not the straightforward recommendation the wired models are.

GameSir G8+ Bluetooth: Specs

GameSir G8+ Bluetooth

Price

$79.99 / £79.99 / AU$129

Dimensions

9.06 x 4.21 x 2.17 in / 230 x 107 x 55mm

Weight

0.69 lbs / 314g

Connection

Bluetooth 5.3, Wired USB-C (PC), Wireless Dongle (sold separately)

Compatibility

iOS, Android, Nintendo Switch, PC, macOS

Software

GameSir App (Android only)

GameSir G8+ Bluetooth: Design and features

• Comfortable, console controller-like ergonomics shared with the rest of the G8 range
• Bluetooth versatility across five platforms, but mode switching is a hassle
• Special edition designs are only available in certain markets

The G8+ Bluetooth is the first and only member of the G8 family that cuts the cord entirely. Wireless freedom and the versatility it brings are the entire pitch, and it helps broaden the G8’s platform compatibility too.

Unlike the original G8 Galileo and the G8+ MFi, which are limited to mobile only, this controller works with iOS, Android, the Nintendo Switch, PC (via wired USB-C or Bluetooth, with a wireless dongle sold separately), and macOS. Console gaming aside, in theory, that means the G8+ is ready to follow you anywhere on your gaming journey.

The reality, unfortunately, is a little more complicated. Each platform requires its own Bluetooth pairing mode, triggered by holding different button combinations on the controller. If you're a one-device person, this is a simple pair-once-and-forget situation, and you can skip to the next paragraph.

If you're hopping between platforms, as I was during testing, it gets tedious fast. Switching modes caused regular reconnection failures with devices the controller had previously been paired with, and keeping track of which mode goes with which platform isn't intuitive. It's workable, and we’re in first-world problem territory here for sure, but it's not the seamless experience it should be.

FutureFuture

On the plus side, turning it on couldn’t be simpler because stretching the controller open automatically powers it on and letting it close fully again powers it down. This isn’t a life-changing feature but certainly a nice convenience that worked reliably throughout testing.

A 1000mAh battery sits split across both grips, charging via USB-C. The GameSir app tracks each side independently, which is how I discovered the left and right grips drain at slightly different rates despite charging as a single unit. I saw a couple of percent drop over half an hour of active use, and the rated eight-hour battery life seems about right based on that.

The black colorway is a clean, classic look that feels more like a traditional controller than the grey and grey-and-white of its wired siblings. GameSir has also released rather jazzy Hulk- and Thanos-themed special editions in some regions, making this the only G8 variant with cosmetic variety, though they’ll set you back a little more for the paint job.

The build quality and overall shape match the rest of the family; it’s well designed and well built with the same full-size, Xbox-like grips, textured backs and a solid chassis. It’s comfortable to hold for extended sessions, and while at 11oz/314g it's the heaviest of the three on paper, the balance is good, and the weight didn't register during testing.

Case compatibility is a mixed bag, as is often the case with mobile controller grips. Without a USB-C connector going into the phone, there's no port angle to stress about, thankfully, but the physical cradle can still be tight.

My iPhone 17 Pro fit with a slim case on but sat at a noticeable angle towards the left side, which saw it protrude more than I’d like. There is a rubber pad on the phone deck that appears to serve the same purpose as the G8+ MFi's removable magnetic panel for camera bump clearance, but this one is glued down rather than magnetically attached.

GameSir’s marketing suggests this is still meant to be removed to accommodate camera bumps, but it really didn't feel like it wanted to come off, and I wasn't willing to force it. If you do take it off, don’t expect it to go back on neatly and expect to trap plenty of dust in the residue.

The D-pad shares the same feel as the rest of the G8 family: slightly mushy initial movement but with a clicky, short-travel feel once you commit to an input. Swappable ABXY caps and thumbstick caps carry over, too, as do the three alternate stick options, and they’re easily adjusted by popping off the magnetic faceplates.

Once again, however, GameSir only includes one of each of these replaceable sticks, so you can’t run the same option on both sides. One annoyance that cropped up here for the first time on any G8 I’ve tested: on iOS, the controller connects as a DualShock controller, so all on-screen UI elements in compatible games display PlayStation button labels.

GameSir doesn't include any PlayStation-legended alternative keycaps in the box, so you’ll need to remember that triangle is Y, for example.

(Image credit: Future)GameSir G8+ Bluetooth: Performance

• Hall effect inputs are excellent and responsive, but Bluetooth feels a step behind wired
• iPhone users lose app support, back buttons, and customization entirely
• Vibration motors remain largely a spec-sheet feature with no real-world use

As you’d expect, the core gameplay experience with the G8+ Bluetooth mirrors the other options in the G8 range. The Hall effect thumbsticks and triggers are smooth and precise with a high level of sensitivity.

Resistance in these is just right for my taste; I found I was able to confidently hold the sticks at a midpoint for fine adjustments without the sense that the stick was itching to return to its starting point. The triggers offer full analog travel with a responsive hair-trigger mode (assuming you can enable it, more on that shortly). In analog mode, I felt like I had a nice level of control and was able to modulate the throttle in Forza Horizon 6 with plenty of detail.

That said, the Bluetooth connection introduced a subtle but noticeable difference in feel I hadn’t experienced before with a GameSir G8. I couldn’t quite quantify it, but I didn't feel as locked-in using the G8+ Wireless as I did with the wired equivalents.

It's not consistent, obvious latency, or any kind of genuine stutter or interference; it's more that small thumbstick movements occasionally felt like they were getting lost along the way. Everything was perfectly playable, and my skill as a gamer is certainly not high enough for this to be a make-or-break thing, but if you're serious about your gaming, the wired experience is definitely tighter.

(Image credit: Future)

The biggest issue I came across, and the one that separates this controller from the rest of the G8 family, is the iPhone experience. It’s somewhat lacking. Because iOS sees the controller as a DualShock 4, the GameSir app doesn’t recognize the G8+ Bluetooth. That means no stick calibration, no deadzone adjustment, no hair-trigger toggling, and no back button mapping.

The two rear programmable buttons, labeled M1 and M2, ship unbound by default, and there's no way to configure them on iOS. They don't appear in the iPhone's native controller settings either because iOS thinks this is a DualShock 4, which doesn't have back buttons. On macOS, I was able to rebind other buttons through native system options, but back button mapping wasn't available there either for the same reason.

On Android, the picture is much better. The app recognized the controller (though admittedly it took a couple of attempts at first), and once connected, all the usual calibration, deadzone, hair-trigger, and back button configuration options were available. Gaming on the POCO X5 Pro was a smooth experience, with Fortnite and Call of Duty Mobile both running well after the usual game-side controller recognition quirks.

PC gaming was the most pleasant surprise. Connected via either USB-C or Bluetooth, the controller was recognized immediately as a PlayStation 4 controller and was fully mapped out of the box for both local and cloud gaming. Gyro tracking worked here too, which is a nice bonus for games that support it. On macOS, things were less smooth.

The controller initially tried to connect as a "GameSir G8" which required manual Steam configuration and then wasn't recognized in-game. Reverting to DualShock mode fixed the issue, and games worked with automated mapping after that.

Shoudl you buy the GameSir G8+ Bluetooth?Buy it if...

You're an Android user who wants one controller for phone, Switch, and PC
The Bluetooth versatility and full GameSir app support on Android make the G8+ Bluetooth a seriously flexible, wireless option. If you play across multiple platforms and want a single controller to handle them all, this could well be it.

You value wireless convenience over raw precision
No connections mean a simpler experience and fewer points of failure. It also brings a wider variety of devices into play.

Don't buy it if...

You're primarily an iPhone user
While it does work natively for games that play nicely with a physical controller, the lack of GameSir app support, non-functional back buttons, and DualShock workaround make the iPhone experience feel like an afterthought. The wired G8+ MFi is the better choice for the same money and with little drawback.

You want the tightest possible input response
Don’t get me wrong, the Bluetooth connection is perfectly playable, but it doesn't feel as precise and instantly responsive as the wired G8 controllers. If competitive precision matters to you, go wired.

Also consider...

Trying to work out if the GameSir G8+ Bluetooth is the one to get? Here's how it compares to other, similar controller grips.

GameSir G8+ Bluetooth

GameSir G8+ MFi Galileo MFi

Scuf Nomad

Price

$79.99 / £79.99 / AU$129.99

$79.99 / £79.99 / AU$129.99

$99.99 / £89.99 / around AU$179.99

Dimensions

9.06 x 4.21 x 2.17in / 230 x 107 x 55mm

9.02 x 4.20 x 2.13in / 229 x 106.8 x 54.2mm

6.93 x 3.70 x 1.34in / 176 x 93.98 x 34.03mm

Weight

10.72oz / 314g

10.72oz / 304g

0.5 lbs / 228 g

Connection

Bluetooth 5.3, Wired (USB-C), Dongle (sold separately)

Wired (USB-C)

Wireless (Bluetooth)

Compatibility

Android, iOS, Nintendo Switch, PC, macOS

Android, iOS

iOS

Software

GameSir App (Android only)

GameSir App

Scuf Nomad Companion App (iOS)

GameSir G8+ MFi
The G8+ MFi is the wired, Apple-friendly equivalent from the same family. It offers MFi certification, full GameSir app support on both iOS and Android, passthrough charging, a headphone jack, and functional back buttons on every platform. If you don't need wireless or Switch/PC compatibility, it's the more complete package.

For more information, check out our full GameSir G8+ MFi review

Scuf Nomad
The Scuf Nomad is an iPhone-only Bluetooth alternative with a lighter build, 16 hours of battery life, and an app that actually works on iOS. It's more compact, handles phone cases better, and has configurable rear paddles. The trade-off is no Android, Switch, or PC support and a higher price tag.

For more information, check out our full Scuf Nomad review

How I tested the GameSir G8+ Bluetooth

• Tested with multiple devices
• A wide variety of games tried
• Compared to other mobile controllers

I spent several days testing across iOS, Android, PC, and macOS, with a focus on comparing the experience to the wired G8 and G8+ MFi I'd previously reviewed.

I tested on an iPhone 17 Pro and POCO X5 Pro 5G, playing Fortnite, Call of Duty Mobile, and Forza Horizon 6 via Xbox Cloud Gaming on mobile, and Stardew Valley via Steam on PC. I evaluated Bluetooth connectivity, app compatibility, back button functionality, latency feel, vibration motors, and cross-platform mode switching.

Read more about how we test

First reviewed June-July 2026

Cherry XTRFY K63W Pro Compact Ultra-Wideband: One-minute review

The Cherry XTRFY K63W Pro Compact Ultra-Wideband is a small gaming keyboard with a few surprises in store.

True to its name, it certainly doesn’t take up much room on your desk. It’s also pleasingly light, which means it’s easy to move around. Despite this and the plastic construction, the build quality seems high.

There are some unique features to the design of the K63W Pro. One is the prominent springiness of the gasket-mounted layout, which is a little strange at first, but ultimately it’s not an issue and the keys still feel just as solid as those in the best gaming keyboards.

Another is the arrow keys. Not only are they much larger than most, but each of the four directions has a second binding to include right control, right shift, menu, and Fn inputs. There’s a shortcut for toggling between the two sets of bindings, as well as activating both at the same time, with the input triggered determined by whether a key is pressed or held.

(Image credit: Future)

There’s also an option to select these modes in Cherry’s companion software. This software has other customizations, but not many. The remapping options are especially disappointing, thanks to their very awkward setup and limited options. There’s barely any performance tweaks here, either.

Thankfully, the K63W Pro is a capable performer as it is. The keys travel further than you might expect given their low profile, but they’re still just about snappy enough for fast gaming and typing. The ergonomic slant of the keycaps, as well as the generous spacing between them, make them easy to use, while the aforementioned thinness of the chassis makes for a comfortable experience, even without a wrist rest.

Cherry makes much of the K63W Pro’s Ultra-Wideband (UWB) wireless technology, which is designed to prevent potential interference. However, I can’t say I noticed an improvement over other wireless keyboards, and the tech isn’t worth the impracticality that comes with the incongruously large wireless puck. It’s also a shame there’s no Bluetooth support.

The K63W Pro is reasonably expensive for a compact keyboard, although the quality and interesting layout help its case in this regard. The performance is good and it's comfortable to use, but I’m not sure every gamer is going to get along with its unique features.

Cherry XTRFY K63W Pro Compact Ultra-Wideband review: Price and availability

(Image credit: Future)

• $169.99 (about £150 / AU$240)
• Available now
• Expensive for a small board

The Cherry XTRFY K63W Pro Compact Ultra-Wideband costs $169.99 (about £150 / AU$240) and is available now. It comes with a USB cable and the UWB USB receiver.

This is a reasonably high price for a 70% keyboard, especially one that lacks Bluetooth support and input customizations. However, there are certainly more expensive mechanical boards out there, such as the Razer BlackWidow V4 Pro 75. I loved the performance of that board when I reviewed it, and it has a much better selection of input customizations than the K63W Pro.

If you want something more budget-friendly, consider the Monsgeek FUN60 Ultra. This keyboard has analog switches with a heap of performance-related features and tweaks at their disposal. They also feel just as good as mechanical switches in my view.

• Value score: 3.5

Cherry XTRFY K63W Pro Compact Ultra-Wideband review: Specs

Layout

70%

Switch

Mechanical (Cherry MX Low Profile 2.0)

Programmable keys

Yes

Dimensions

12.1 x 5.3 x 1.2 inches (307 x 135 x 30 mm)

RGB or backlighting

Yes (customizable)

Cherry XTRFY K63W Pro Compact Ultra-Wideband review: Design and features

(Image credit: Future)

• Thin and light
• Springboard-like
• Limited input customizations

There's nothing particularly exciting about the way the K63W Pro looks. It keeps things basic, although the rounded edges are a nice touch, helping to relieve its austerity a little.

True to its name, the K63W Pro is indeed compact. In addition to its truncated width, it’s also quite thin, making it comfortable to use even without a wrist rest — which is just as well, since it doesn’t come with one.

Despite its plastic construction, the K63W Pro feels sturdy and built to a high standard. Rather unique is the prominent flex of the keyboard plate. This can be pushed down quite a way when pressing a key, which is a little disconcerting at first, but it still feels perfectly stable and it rebounds fully. I wasn’t concerned about its durability, either.

(Image credit: Future)

The keycaps feel premium, too. They’re pleasingly textured and solid with little play. On top of this, the bright RGB backlighting shines through them very well, and the main legends are large and clear, although those for the Fn shortcuts on the function keys are a little too small.

You get more keys on the K63W Pro than you might think, including some navigation ones such as delete and insert. However, it’s odd there’s a blank key in the top-right corner; a missed opportunity to squeeze in another, perhaps, such as a Home key.

There are quite a few useful Fn shortcuts on the function row, including those for adjusting volume and one for opening your default browser, which are all welcome. However, a few remained a mystery to me. Two look like they adjust some sort of performance-related parameter, but I didn’t notice any action when I pressed them. There’s also one on F9 with Cherry’s logo on it that opens the Windows Run box and enters some kind of address, but again nothing happened when I pressed it. The text was too long and disappeared too quickly for me to read it, but my only guess is that it’s supposed to open some kind of Cherry software.

(Image credit: Future)

The most interesting aspect of the K63W Pro’s layout is the Mod Tap arrow keys. These are larger than your typical set since they have secondary bindings, with control, shift, menu, and Fn inputs mapped to each direction. Pressing Fn+M (there’s another Fn key mapped to the insert key) will cycle between three different modes: one enables the usual arrow key inputs, one enables the secondary bindings, and one enables both sets at the same time, with taps triggering arrow directions and holds triggering the secondary functions. The M key lights up a different color depending on which mode is active.

You can also switch between these modes using the Cherry Utility. This desktop app also features other customizations, although their dearth is disappointing. It has perhaps the worst rebinding mode I've ever seen in peripheral software, requiring you to click a ‘create’ button for every key you want to rebind, in order to bring up the option to rebind it. The layout graph doesn’t display your remapped bindings, which is another baffling oversight, and you can’t alter the Fn layer of shortcuts. There aren’t many performance-related settings here, either; you can adjust the polling rate for both wired and wireless modes, and there’s a SOCD mode with three basic settings, but that’s all you get.

Rather than your typical USB dongle, the K63W Pro comes with a block-shaped puck that requires a USB cable (also included) to connect to your device. This is what facilitates the UWB connectivity, which Cherry claims reduces interference compared to standard wireless connections. It looks sleek, but it’s quite large and takes up more space than I’m happy with, especially when you factor in the trailing cable.

• Design & features score: 3.5 / 5

Cherry XTRFY K63W Pro Compact Ultra-Wideband review: Performance

(Image credit: Future)

• Relatively heavy keys
• Great space bar
• Unnecessary Ultra-Wideband connectivity

I mostly enjoyed my time using the K63W Pro. The keys feel well lubed and reasonably damped, although it still verges on the side of clicky than thocky, which, depending on your preferences, is either a good thing or a bad thing. Personally, I liked the feedback they provided.

I was also fond of the low-profile keycaps, which seem to slant slightly towards the user. This helped me hit keys flush, making up for the somewhat limiting tilt angle of the board, even with the two-stage feet out. This was especially noticeable with the space bar, a key I often hit on its edge but not here. It also feels slightly more damped than the other keys, while still being easy to press, a combination that makes it very satisfying to hammer away at.

The switches themselves are also low profile (specifically, they’re Cherry’s MX Low Profile 2.0). However, they have surprisingly deep travel, which makes them more satisfying than they otherwise would be. Despite this, their actuation point is relatively shallow, which meant I could still type with a reasonably light touch. They strike just the right balance between being snappy and forgiving of minor mispresses.

(Image credit: Future)

Tying accuracy is also aided by the large size of the keycaps, as well as their wide spacing. While this made reaching certain keys a little difficult when touch typing, it made gaming in the WASD position quite comfortable and secure. I could also reach the peripheral keys easily from here, including the space bar, thanks to its aforementioned slant and low profile.

In my experience, the Mod Tap feature works reasonably well, achieving Cherry’s aim of reducing side bulk without sacrificing inputs. However, you have to hold an arrow key for a long time to activate its secondary binding. I found this particularly frustrating when typing, as I required quick and regular access to the right shift key, but I often didn’t hold the Up arrow key long enough to access it. It’s also disappointing that you can’t alter the hold time.

Although Cherry makes bold claims about the UWB wireless connectivity, I can't say I noticed any performance gains over other wireless keyboards I’ve tested. Such models have greatly improved in recent years, to the point where regular-sized USB dongles perform pretty much flawlessly. And if you are an elite player concerned about lags and dropouts, you’ll probably opt for a wired connection anyway. All this is to say that the UWB tech and the outsized puck are ultimately overkill for many. What’s more, the K63W Pro doesn’t have Bluetooth support, as lots of other premium wireless keyboards feature.

• Performance score: 4 / 5

Should I buy the Cherry XTRFY K63W Pro Compact Ultra-Wideband?Scorecard

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Value

Expensive for a compact board, but the quality and spec is there at least.

3.5 / 5

Design and features

Thin and light, with a solid build and a unique layout. The software is disappointing, though.

3.5 / 5

Performance

The K63W Pro is comfortable for gaming and typing for the most part, but the Mod Tap feature will take some getting used to.

4 / 5

Overall

The K63W Pro is a solid mechanical keyboard that does a few things differently, but not entirely successfully. Still, it’s a reliable and comfortable unit for most gamers.

3.5 / 5

Buy it if…

You want a compact board
The K63W Pro cleverly includes keys usually omitted from such a small layout, although it does take some getting used to.

You want a comfortable board
The thin chassis and ergonomic keycaps makes the K63W Pro a board you can use all day long, although touch typing will test your dexterity at times.

Don't buy it if…

You want the snappiest experience
Despite the low profile keycaps, they have a greater travel than you might expect, which might deter those after lighting-quick taps.

You want the best input customizations
The companion software’s rebinding functionality is quite woeful; there are barely any performance-related tweaks.

Cherry XTRFY K63W Pro Compact Ultra-Wideband review: Also consider

Razer BlackWidow V4 Pro 75
If it’s superb mechanical performance you’re after, you can’t do much better than the Razer BlackWidow. I love how tactile and satisfying key presses are, and the number of customizations on offer via Razer’s Synapse software is impressive for a mechanical keyboard, greatly eclipsing the K63W Pro on this front. However, the BlackWidow is an incredibly expensive board, so those wanting to save money should look elsewhere. Read our full Razer BlackWidow V4 Pro 75 review.

Monsgeek FUN60 Ultra
For something decidedly more budget-friendly, the FUN60 Ultra offers all the thrills of a great gaming keyboard without the expense. Its analog switches almost feel as good as mechanical ones, and there are plenty of adjustments you can make to alter their performance. Its construction is surprisingly solid for the price, too. Read our full Monsgeek FUN60 Ultra review.

How I tested the Cherry XTRFY K63W Pro Compact Ultra-Wideband

(Image credit: Future)

• Tested for a few days
• Used for a variety of tasks
• Plentiful gaming keyboard experience

I used the K63W Pro for a few days, during which time I used it for working, general browsing, and of course, gaming. I used it in both wired and wireless modes.

I played games such as 007 First Light and Counter-Strike 2, which are good tests for the speed and accuracy of key inputs.

I’ve been PC gaming for over a decade, and have used numerous keyboards in that time. I’ve also reviewed a large number of them, ranging widely in their form factors, switches types, feature sets, and price points.

• First reviewed: July 2026
• Read more about how we test